Information provided by participants on the state of M&E of adaptation in their areas of work

Information provided by participants in response to the three questions:

Given the diverse set of indicators that currently exist to measure and evaluate adaptation, how can communities, countries and development and adaptation agencies build on a common understanding of success in achieving climate resilience?
How can a framework be created that links individual assessments with national level assessments to broaden the focus from the means of achieving outcomes (individual interventions) to the desired end result (countries’ becoming less vulnerable and having more adaptive capacity)?
How can results from M&E be reported and disseminated so as to ensure that they are fed back into the respective adaptation process but also to allow for lessons learned and good practices identified to be shared with the wider community of adaptation planners and practitioners?

Name	Affiliation	Responses to questions and additional information
Mr. Junnius Arifa	Federal Court of Accounts, Brazil	Response
Mr. Edward Boydell	CARE Australia	Response
Ms. Doreen Chipika Bwalya	Ministry of Transport, Works, Supply and Communication, Zambia	Response
Mr. Mark Bynoe	CCCCC	Response
Mr. Piet de Wildt	Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment, the Netherlands	Response
Ms. Marianne Karlsen	Ministry of Environment, Norway	Response
Mr. Alvin Chandra and Ms. Shirley Laban	Oxfam Australia and Vanuatu	Response Australia PCVA toolkit Response Vanuatu
Ms. Nicolina Lamhauge	OECD	Response
Mr. Rodney Lui	SPREP	Response
Mr. Maman Ibrahim Mahaman	Projet d’Actions Communautaires pour la Résilience Climatique (PACRC) - Niger	Response (fr, en)
Ms. Soojeong Myeong	Korea Adaptation Center for Climate Change	Response
Ms. Rebecca Nicodemus	USAID, USA	Response and USAID's Global Climate Change Adaptation Pillar Results Framework
Ms. Julia Olivier	GIZ, Germany	Response Factsheet National M&E of adaptation, German M&E system: federal and state level Developing an adaptation M&E system for the Philippines Summary of webinars on adaptation M&E
Ms. Winifereti Nainoca Mr. Kevin Petrini	UNDP and UNDP Fiji	Response UNDP Fiji Response UNDP Climate Public Expenditure and Institutional Reviews (CPEIRs): methodology, CPEIRs in the Asia-Pacific Region: what have we learnt?, Samoa CPEIR, Nauru Case Study and a participatory video from Samoa
Mr. Patrick Pringle	UKCIP, UK	Response and UKCIP's AdaptME toolkit
Mr. Bertrand Reysset	National Observatory on the Effects of Climate Change, France	Response
Ms. Christine Roehrer	CIF	CIF Measuring Results "Sharing experiences" CIF Measuring Results Pilot Program for Climate Resilience (PPCR) Monitoring and Reporting Pilot Program for Climate Resilience - PPCR Monitoring and Reporting Toolkit PPCR countries have recently used the Toolkit to establish baselines and expected results for 4 of the 5 PPCR core indicators.
Mr. Albert Salamanca	SEI-Asia	Response
Mr. Sachidananda Satapathy	Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India	Response
Mr. Chakra Pani Sharma	Ministry of Federal Affair and Local Development, Nepal	Response
Mr. Chan Kresna Tauch	Ministry of Economy and Finance, Cambodia	Response and Towards an effective M&E framework for adaptation
Mr. Trevor Thompson	Ministry of Agriculture, Grenada	Response
Ms. María Saralux Valbuena López	Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies of Colombia	Response
Ms. Petra van Rüth	Federal Environment Agency (UBA), Germany	German Adaptation Policy, short state of play

back to main workshop website