Information highlighting different experience in applying gender‐sensitive approaches and tools in the adaptation process, including the understanding and assessing impacts, vulnerability and adaptation, provided by participants by answering the following questions:
- What was the natural hazard and impact on communities?
- Who were the adaptation practitioners?
- How were gender‐sensitive tools and approaches applied?
- Were the gender‐sensitive tools and approaches used for?
- Why was the gender‐sensitive tool / approach so valuable?
- Why did you choose this story?
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Responses to questions related to current experiences
|
Ammar Musmmar
|
Jordan
|
Response (106 kB)
|
Jaime Webbe
|
Convention on Biological Diversity
|
Response (111 kB)
|
Joeli Veitayaki
|
University of the South Pacific
|
Response (110 kB)
|
Minh Nhat Le
|
Vietnam
|
Response (124 kB)
|
Ravadee Prasertcharoensuk
|
Sustainable Development Foundation
|
Response (129 kB)
|
Winston Simpson
|
Rural Agricultural Development Authority
|
Response (108 kB)
|
Information highlighting good practices and tools relating to different aspects of applying gender‐sensitive approaches and tools in the adaptation process, provided by participants by answering the following questions:
- What good practice or tool would you most like to draw attention to and why?
- What are the benefits of the good practice/tool for adaptation?
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Responses to questions related to good practices and tools
|
Fareeha Iqbal
|
The GEF
|
Response (105 kB)
|
Jaime Webbe
|
Convention on Biological Diversity
|
Response (104 kB)
|
Joeli Veitayaki
|
University of the South Pacific
|
Response (103 kB)
|
Minh Nhat Le
|
Vietnam
|
Response (107 kB)
|
Ravadee Prasertcharoensuk
|
Sustainable Development Foundation
|
Response (109 kB)
|
Winston Simpson
|
Rural Agricultural Development Authority
|
Response (103 kB)
|
Tools for applying gender‐sensitive approaches for adaptation contributed by participants during the meeting:
back to main workshop website