The Global Climate Action Agenda (GCAA) presents opportunities to advance and accelerate implementation at scale. It is in that spirit that Climate Weeks in Yeosu, Republic of Korea (CW3, held in April) and Baku, Azerbaijan (CW4, September), brought together a broad range of stakeholders – including national delegations, subnational governments and non‑Party stakeholders (NPS) – with a strong focus on showcasing practical climate solutions, including those linked to building resilience for cities, infrastructure and water.
Countries across the globe shared how they are moving from planning to execution. They exchanged ideas on real-economy transitions in urban development, among other themes. They explored ways to get more finance flowing to where it’s needed, like adaptation for vulnerable communities and in responding to losses faced by those in the frontline of climate change.
Adaptation action was shown to be entering a more operational and implementation-focused phase, with growing emphasis on strengthening resilience outcomes, improving decision-relevant data systems, and supporting evidence-informed implementation. A recurring message was that advancing the implementation of adaptation requires working through a full logical chain: moving from the UAE Framework’s Global Goal on Adaptation (GGA) Targets and Indicators, through risk pathways that ground the rationale for action, essential solutions that package change, deployment architecture that finances implementation, and adaptation orchestration that ensures delivery reaches the last mile, with monitoring, evaluation and learning closing the loop. Discussions relating to implementation of the UAE Framework for Global Climate Resilience highlighted the importance of improving the usability of adaptation-related information and strengthening links between data, planning and decision-making processes.
Several sessions highlighted practical tools and approaches already being applied at country level, including risk mapping, climate impact pathways, vulnerability assessments, and locally led adaptation approaches. Participants also stressed that effective adaptation systems must remain flexible and iterative, enabling countries and communities to adjust actions over time as climate risks evolve and lessons emerge from implementation.
Finally, participants emphasized that monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) systems are increasingly being used not only to track activities, but also to inform policy, strengthen accountability, and improve the effectiveness of adaptation support.
The Implementation Forums organized during CW3 and CW4 were focused on supporting efforts to accelerate climate action by creating a dedicated space where Parties and NPS could meet on equal footing to exchange practical solutions, align priorities, and collectively discuss how to move from ambition to implementation at scale. Under Axis 4, one of the lead high-impact, scalable solutions emerging from the Implementation Labs and Impact Dialogues is described below: