Distr.
RESTRICTED
FCCC/IDR.1/ICE
30 January 1997
ENGLISH ONLY
ICELAND
Report on the in-depth review of the national
communication of Iceland
Review team:
Naigzy Gebremedhin, Eritrea
Jaan-Mati Punning, Estonia
Clare Breidenich, United States of America
Peer Stiansen, UNFCCC secretariat,
Coordinator
Also available on the World Wide Web
(http://www.unfccc.de)
GE.97-
Under Articles 4 and 12 of the Convention. Parties are requested
to prepare national communications on their implementation of the
Convention. Guidelines for the preparation of national communications
and the process for the review were agreed on by the
Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on
Climate Change, by its decisions 9/2 and 10/1, and 3/CP.1 (see
FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1) In accordance with these decisions, a
compilation and synthesis of the 33 national communications from
Annex I Parties was prepared (FCCC/CP/12 and Add.1 and 2).
When reviewing the implementation of the Convention of the
Parties, the subsidiary bodies and the Conference of the Parties will
have this report available to them in English as well as the summary
of the report in the six official languages of the United Nations.
(These bodies will also have before them the executive summary of the
first national communication of Iceland and country-specific
information drawn from a compilation and synthesis report covering
all countries that have submitted national communications.)
Summary(1)
1. The in-depth review was carried out during the period
September to December 1996, and included a country visit by the team
from 9 to 12 September 1996. The team included experts from Eritrea,
Estonia and the United States of America. Iceland ratified the
Convention on 16 June 1993, and the national communication was due on
21 September 1994. It was only received by the secretariat on 4 March
1996. Additional background material was made available to the
team.
2. Iceland's economy is heavily dependent on fishing but
some energy-intensive industries based on the relatively abundant
supply of hydropower are also important. Energy consumption is high,
two thirds of it based on hydro and geothermal sources, including
practically all electricity. Carbon dioxide (CO2 )
emissions amounted to about 8.5 tonnes per capita in 1990, lower than
the average of about 12 tonnes for countries of the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Two thirds of these
emissions are almost equally divided between traditional transport
and fishing vessels. Iceland has only about 270,000 inhabitants and a
small administration which has to prioritize domestic and
international tasks. Climate change is given high priority, and
responses have been organized as an interministerial effort since
1991, with various working groups. Iceland has a target of
stabilizing its emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in 2000 at the
1990 level. Further developments of the export-oriented
energy-intensive industry will be exempted from this target.
Continued degradation of vegetation and soil erosion at present
constitute the most serious environmental problem in
Iceland.
3. The relative importance of greenhouse gas emissions in
1990 based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
1994 global warming potentials (GWPs) was as follows: CO2
67 per cent, CH4 18 per cent, N2O 6 per cent
and other gases (perfluorocarbons (PFCs) from industrial processes)
about 9 per cent. The share of process emissions from industry
(CO2 and PFCs) is particularly high. The team was given
revised 1990 figures as well as data for 1990-1995. These are based
on the IPCC guidelines and presented in a transparent manner with
emphasis on areas where improvement is needed. The situation in the
land-use change and forestry sector was not sufficiently clear to
determine whether this is a net sink or a source, or to give figures.
Only about one per cent of the land is presently covered with forest.
Emissions of non-CO2 gases are relatively uncertain, and
the team concluded that the estimate of nitrous oxide is still likely
to be revised significantly downwards. The estimates of methane
emissions for more recent years than 1990 have less uncertainty
thanks to the better knowledge of landfill conditions. The team also
noted that Iceland has made efforts to develop a methodology for
calculating CO2 emissions related to the utilization of
geothermal sources.
4. The Government approved an action plan on climate
change in October 1995. The national communication often described
planned rather than implemented actions, and the team noted that
progress had been made both in terms of the institutional framework
and implementation of some concrete measures. This builds on
activities carried out over many years, and the team in particular
noted the efforts to utilize renewables. The team noted that, because
of the relatively high proportion of renewables in the energy supply,
many measures applied in other countries to reduce energy use would
not have much impact on CO2 emissions in Iceland. There is
still some technical scope for reducing CO2 emissions from
stationary energy use, where special measures are taken to make
substitution with electricity possible for industry and fishing
vessels in harbours. In transport, there are some initiatives on
land-use planning and public transport at the local government level.
General carbon taxes are under consideration, and a shift towards
taxing the use rather than the purchase of cars is foreseen. A
working group on emissions from the fisheries sector was established
in September 1996.
5. The Government is preparing a master plan for land use
with the primary aim of bringing soil erosion under control. There is
a programme to sequester 100,000 tons of carbon annually through
revegetation and reforestation, although additional efforts will be
needed to fulfil the goal in 2000. Also voluntary activities are
important in this sector. The Government intends to reduce the waste
stream by 50 per cent, and the waste management practices in the
Reykjavik area have already been improved during the present decade.
Since late 1996 biogas from the biggest landfill has been collected,
a measure which alone is expected to reduce national methane
emissions by 10-15 per cent. The team in particular noted the efforts
made by the aluminium industry, which has reduced emissions of PFCs
by 80 per cent since 1990, and the partial use of waste wood instead
of coal in the ferrosilicon industry. An estimate of the overall
effects of measures could not be provided.
6. The communication contains projections for all direct
and indirect GHGs, except for the land-use change and forestry
sector, and the team found the methodologies and assumptions
reasonable. The projections had been revised before the team's visit.
CO2 emissions actually grew by 6 per cent between 1990 and
1995, and could grow by 14 per cent by 2000, based on decisions taken
and measures implemented, the main factor being transport, including
fisheries. Additional industrial developments could further increase
this substantially, but such developments would not be counted
against the national target as the origin of such emissions is not
considered to be "domestic consumption". Methane emissions decreased
by 9 per cent and could decrease further mainly as a result of
developments in the waste sector. Nitrous oxide will remain a small
component of Icelandic emissions. Even if aluminium production
increases, PFC emissions are expected to remain significantly lower
than in 1990. Hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) emissions could, however,
represent 3-4 per cent or more of total GHG emissions in 2000,
depending on the speed at which the use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)
is phased out in the fishing fleet. With the current measures,
emissions of all GHGs could increase by 6 per cent by 2000 without
further growth in the energy-intensive industry. Thus, achievement of
stabilization would most likely require a rapid and effective
implementation of additional measures.
7. The impacts of climate change on Iceland are very
uncertain, as the nature of such change is itself uncertain. Even a
cooling is not an unlikely possibility. Iceland's economy is very
vulnerable to changes in the conditions for the fisheries, which
could be brought about by marginal climatic changes. Agriculture is
also seen as vulnerable. There are no specific adaptation measures,
but the country is adapted to a considerable natural variability.
Given its limited resources, Iceland relies heavily on and
participates actively in international research and development.
Spending for this purpose as a percentage of gross national product
(GNP) has been relatively low. The country has a well developed
meteorological service and network of monitoring
stations.
8. Iceland has not participated in the Global Environment
Facility (GEF). Official development assistance in 1994 was about 0.1
per cent of GNP, and there are some bilateral projects relevant to
the Convention, in particular on the utilization of geothermal
energy. The team also noted the host role and funding of the United
Nations programme on geothermal energy. Some efforts have been made
on education, training and public awareness, through the media and by
making information available for schools. Cooperation with non
governmental organisations is also seen as contributing to raising
public awareness.
I. INTRODUCTION AND NATIONAL
CIRCUMSTANCES
9. Iceland ratified the Convention on 16 June 1993. Its
national communication was due on 21 September 1994, but it was only
received by the secretariat on 4 March 1996, more than 17 months
late. The in-depth review was carried out during the period September
to December 1996 and included a country visit by the team from 9 to
12 September 1996. The members of the review team were Mr. Naigzy
Gebremedhin (Eritrea), Mr. Jaan-Mati Punning (Estonia), Ms. Clare
Breidenich (United States of America) and Mr Peer Stiansen (UNFCCC
secretariat, Coordinator). The team met with governmental officials
and representatives from the academic community as well as business
and environmental non-governmental organizations, and additional
background material was also made available.
10. Iceland is located in the North Atlantic Ocean and has
only about 270,000 inhabitants, two thirds living in the capital area
and the rest spread around the island. It has a relatively cold
climate with heating requirements almost all year round. The
geographical location generates considerable needs for imports and
transport of goods over long distances. It has no railways or inland
waterways. Because of the location and the sparse population, many
environmental problems are less noticeable than in continental Europe
or North America. However, since settlement in the ninth century, the
percentage of the county that is vegetated has been reduced from an
estimated 65 to about 25, and forests now covers only 1 per cent of
the area compared to 25 per cent. This largely manmade situation,
where livestock grazing is a key element, has led to serious soil
erosion. Continued degradation of vegetation and soil erosion at
present constitute the most serious environmental problem in Iceland,
and is also an important factor in the overall carbon balance and
thus climate change.
11. Iceland is among the richest countries in the world
measured on a gross domestic product (GDP) per capita basis. The most
important economic sector is the fishing, which accounts for 50 per
cent of Iceland's foreign exchange earnings and approximately 75 per
cent of Iceland's merchandise exports. Iceland also has some heavy
industry that is the source of a considerable proportion of emissions
of greenhouse gases (GHG). The economy tends to follow fluctuations
in the fishing sector, rather than short-term international economic
fluctuations. Longer-term economic trends, however, are relatively
stable. Unemployment, inflation and public debt are low. The
population is currently growing at a rate of just over 1 per cent
annually, faster than the average of about 0.7 per cent, in countries
of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD).
12. Iceland has a relatively high energy consumption per
capita, about 8 tonnes of oil equivalent (toe) compared to around 4
toe on average for OECD countries in 1990. Carbon dioxide
(CO2) emissions per capita were 8.5 tonnes in 1990, which
is close to the Western European average but lower than the OECD
average of about 12 tonnes. Two thirds of the energy supply is
renewable. The electricity supply is around 4-5 Twh. Iceland enjoys a
relatively abundant and low-cost supply of hydropower, from which
about 94 per cent of the electricity is generated, and which
represents 17 per cent of the energy balance. About 6 per cent of the
electricity is generated from geothermal sources, which could be
expanded. Particularly over the last two decades, geothermal heating
has been developed to supply most of the population. Geothermal
heating constitutes 48 per cent of the energy balance. Fossil fuels
are mainly used for transport, with the fishing fleet using more than
60 per cent of the diesel oil, although some is used in industry and
only 2 per cent still for heating, particularly in areas where
geothermal sources are not available. Iceland has no
railways.
13. Iceland has relatively high taxes and prices in the
case of transport fuels, while the prices of oils for heating and
industry are lower than the OECD average. Because of the geographical
location, there is a very high use of international bunker fuels
compared with domestic use, which makes up around 25 per cent of oil
use. Like other countries, Iceland is considering some reforms in the
energy sector, where the production and distribution entities are
largely publicly-owned monopolies. However, given the country's size
and location, the developments towards deregulation observed in
particular elsewhere in Europe may not necessarily be feasible in
Iceland. Further, given the domestic sources of supply, such
developments may not necessarily affect emissions of greenhouse gases
to any great extent.
14. Iceland has had a separate ministry for the
environment since 1990. This ministry coordinates policy on climate
change, which has been formulated by an interministerial group since
1991 also involving various agencies. An action programme on
combating climate change (CC-programme) was adopted by the Government
in October 1995. Within the CC programme there are several subgroups
working on different aspects of climate change. Implementation of the
programme is now the responsibility of the relevant ministries.
Background work is carried out in particular by the environment and
energy agencies. There is also a group comprising personal advisers
to the ministers, which was established to oversee the implementation
of the programme. Iceland drew up a national environmental strategy
in 1993, and a Programme of Action for Sustainable Development was
approved by a special Environmental Assembly in November 1996. This
programme is expected to be adopted by the Government in early 1997.
The policies and measures in the CC programme are an integral part of
the Programme of Action for Sustainable Development. The ministries
have regular contacts with business and some environmental
non-governmental organizations. Most measures are decided and
implemented by the Government, and so far the parliament has had
relatively little direct involvement in climate change policies,
except through the annual budget process.
15. Iceland is a member of the European Economic Area,
which implies that some responses to climate change, including
policies and measures, are decided upon in concert with other members
of that grouping. Some responsibilities for policies and measures, in
particular those related to land-use and waste, are left to the local
communities. Given the limited number of people working in central
government, Iceland has to establish priorities regarding which
activities it wants to carry out domestically, and in which detail,
and to what extent it can participate in the international processes.
Given the importance of potential impacts for Iceland, the Government
has given priority to the climate change process and negotiations
related to marine pollution.
16. During the UNFCCC process, Iceland has emphasized the
importance of different national circumstances and starting points
among the Annex I countries, drawing attention to its own
predominantly renewables-based stationary energy consumption. In
particular, Iceland views the commitments in Article 4.2 as a
collective commitment of Annex I Parties, and that differences in
starting points and approaches, economic structure and resource base
should be taken into account for commitments by individual states.
The communication states that obligations to limit emissions of GHGs
should not prevent new development of heavy industries in the
country, since these industries would normally be much more carbon-
intensive if located elsewhere. Iceland's national goal is
consequently to stabilize emissions of greenhouse gases from
traditional industries and economic activities, such as transport and
the fishing fleet, and emissions caused by enlargements of the energy
intensive industry, powered by clean energy sources, should thus not
be counted against this goal since the location of these activities
in Iceland is considered to minimize the global effect.
II. INVENTORIES OF ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS AND
REMOVALS
17. Iceland's communication includes summary tables for
emissions of CO2, methane (CH4), nitrous oxide
(N2O), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide
(CO), non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC),
perfluorocarbons (PFC) and hydrofluorocarbons (HFC) for the years
1990, 1991, 1992, 1993. The team was given revised and new data for
1990-1993 and 1994-1995, respectively, as well as the background
information necessary to be able to reproduce the figures. The team
concluded that the Icelandic greenhouse gas inventory data given in
the communication were reported in the accordance with the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines. During
the in-depth review, new improved data were presented, which slightly
differ from those given in the communication. It became clear also
that for some gases and sources further revisions could be
expected.
18. CO2 emissions account for about 67 per cent
of total emissions of GHGs, based on IPCC 1994 global warming
potential (GWP) values. The actual figure for CO2 has been
revised slightly from 2,172 to 2,147 Gg. Transport accounts for 64
per cent of these emissions, and the share of process emissions from
industry, 18 per cent, is high compared to other countries owing to
the use of renewables in other sectors. Nearly half of the transport
emissions were attributed to fishing vessels. Iceland collects data
on fuels for the fishing fleet bought abroad: However, in accordance
with IPCC guidelines, emissions from this are not included in the
estimate. Iceland has worked out methods, based on measurements, for
estimating emissions of CO2 from the geothermal waters
used in energy production. This source represented 4 per cent of
total CO2 emissions in 1990. The emission data in the
energy and industry sectors have a high level of reliability.
Emissions from international bunker fuels were estimated separately
and not included in the total figure. They equalled 15 per cent of
CO2 emissions, this high figure being explained by
Iceland's location and its, travel and trade patterns. CO2
emissions grew by about 6 per cent between 1990 and
1995.
19. CH4 emissions were estimated at 23 Gg,
which represents about 18 per cent of total GHG emissions, based on
IPCC 1994 GWP values. The total figure for 1990 was not revised, and
the two principal sources were the agriculture and waste sectors,
each of which were responsible for around half of these emissions.
These estimates are relatively uncertain. For the waste sector, the
statistics for activity data in 1990 were rough. Further, knowledge
of the conditions in a number of the landfills and dump sites was not
sufficient to determine whether these actually generate methane or
not. Since 1990, there has been a change in waste practices, in
particular in Reykjavik, and in parallel an improvement in the
statistics, which reduces the uncertainties. In the agricultural
sector, it is not known to what extent the high emission factor taken
from the IPCC accurately reflects Icelandic conditions for enteric
fermentation. Overall methane emissions fell by about 9 per cent
between 1990 and 1995, most of the reduction stemming from the waste
sector.
20. N2O emissions were estimated at 0.5 Gg,
representing 6 per cent of total GHG emissions, based on IPCC 1994
GWP values, whereas a figure of 0.6 was given in the communication.
The main source was agriculture. The figure from agriculture appears
to be a considerable overestimate, as it implies that all nitrogen
contained in the fertilizers was emitted and none fixed in plants. A
significant downward revision may thus be expected. However,
emissions from fertilizer production was not included, but efforts
are under way to estimate these.
21. Other gases account for a relatively high share of
Iceland's GHG emissions, about 9 per cent, based on IPCC 1994 GWP
values, owing to emissions of PFCs from aluminium production. These
emissions were reduced by more than 80 per cent between 1990 and
1995. Using an alternative method of estimation, the PFC emission
level was twice as high, which illustrates the uncertainty still
connected with this source. Since 1990, Iceland has started to use
HFCs as replacements for substances controlled by the Montreal
Protocol. The use of these was estimated at 0.10 Gg in 1995, based on
sales quantities. Iceland also monitors the indirect GHGs, recording
a slight growth in NOx emissions together with a slight
decline in CO and NMVOC emissions between 1990 and 1995.
22. The situation in the land-use change and forestry
sector was not sufficiently clear to give estimates of emissions and
removals. These could be considerable, but it was not even possible
to assess the direction of the net contribution from the sector
arising from the sum of soil erosion, peatland deterioration,
afforestation, etc. The team noted that it is conceptually difficult
to define what is natural and what is anthropogenic in this sector,
as the present situation is the consequence of settlement more than
1100 years ago. Still, for example, regeneration of vegetation/forest
and wetlands is also highly dependent on current
practices.
III. POLICIES AND MEASURES
23. The team concluded that Iceland has introduced a
number of policies and measures that mitigate climate change both
prior to and after the coming into force of the Convention. A more
specific action was the establishment of a carbon dioxide committee
and various working groups. The visit confirmed that a number of
working groups are active or have been formed to assess mitigation
options in various sectors. The communication refers broadly to a
wide range of measures covering the industrial, transport, forestry,
land management and agricultural sectors, as well as fisheries and
waste disposal, but it gives limited details on each of them.
Further, it does not always describe the status: whether the policies
and measures are proposed, planned or implemented. Often the
communication merely outlines the areas where measures should be
assessed and signals the will to do so. Consequently, the team found
that the country visit greatly improved the quality of information on
policies and measures across all sectors.
24. The team noted that the national environmental
strategy from 1993 provides an overall framework for climate change
response in Iceland, with emphasis on sustainable development,
pollution prevention, renewable energy and land reclamation. An
action plan on climate change was adopted by the Government in
October 1995. Iceland possesses environmental legislation, including
an act on environmental impacts assessment, which could in principle
be applied to emissions of GHGs from certain sources, although this
has not been done so far.
25. The team noted in particular the utilization of
renewable energy sources, which have been developed significantly
over the last two decades. These sources now cover two thirds of all
energy use and 95 per cent of stationary energy use. Emissions from
mobile sources, which constitutes 65 per cent of CO2
emissions, represent the biggest challenge for Iceland. Given that
stationary energy use is largely based on renewables, the team
recognized that the options for further reducing carbon dioxide
emissions are more limited than in countries with systems more
dependent on fossil fuels. Generally, the team found that in areas
where Iceland has significant options to control greenhouse gas
emissions, a wide range of measures are being considered. Several
measures are already having effects and the team noted in particular
the considerable reductions achieved in reducing PFC
emissions.
26. The team noted some policies that could be assessed in
the light of Article 4.2.(e)(ii) of the Convention, which states that
each of these Parties shall "identify and periodically review its own
policies and practices which encourage activities that lead to
greater levels of anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases not
controlled by the Montreal Protocol than would otherwise occur". The
fuel tax has one component which is earmarked for road building, and
the team felt that it could be worth assessing whether this way of
financing leads to more roads being built, and the impacts that would
have on traffic and the corresponding emissions. The team noted that
such an assessment has been carried out for the policies related to
further developing energy-intensive industry, which is likely to
increase Icelandic emissions.
A. Carbon dioxide
27. Several economic policies and measures are under
consideration or being implemented. Some parts of the tax system are
under evaluation, in particular those related to vehicles and fuels.
Unlike the other Nordic countries, Iceland has not introduced any
CO2 taxes, but this is being considered. If such taxes had
the same structure as in other countries, with exemptions for process
emissions, the fishing fleet and possibly some other industrial
sources, the team note that the pattern of emissions in Iceland is
such that most of the emissions would be exempted. The effects on
emissions of higher prices for fossil fuels may not be very great,
especially in the short run, as there may be limited possibilities
for substitution. Changes in the tax structure on fossil fuels were
seen as unlikely to be implemented before 1998 at the
earliest.
28. The team noted that Iceland still has large technical
potential to develop hydro and geothermal energy, although the
options are likely to have increasing costs and, particularly in the
case of hydro, also increasing degrees of conflict with nature
conservation interests. Still, increased demands for heat and
electricity are expected to be met by renewables. There are, however,
limits to how much of the little remaining stationary use of fossil
fuels can be substituted. The team noted that some utilities apply
demand-side management to incite consumers to use less heat and
electricity. The effects of such efforts depend on the possibilities
for substitution in the market; the more fossil fuel users are able
to switch between, in particular, electricity and of oil, the more
effective these efforts will be in reducing CO2
emissions.
29. The team noted that the Icelandic Government is
endeavouring to increase the flexibility of switching to electricity
for those that still depend on fossil fuels for stationary
combustion. Together with the electricity utilities and producers, it
has devised an option for fish meal plants (of which there were 28 at
the time of the team's visit) and other users to buy so-called
"occasional power" for partly replacing their use of oil for steam
production. The price is low because, for example, the supply may be
interrupted should the supply of power for this market be reduced.
The National Power Company has signed contracts with 10 users which
have made the necessary and often significant investments to be able
to use electricity. These investments can often be paid back in a few
years. The transmission grid is sometimes an obstacle. The
communication refers to a potential for CO2 reductions
from this measure of 70,000 tonnes.
30. A similar effort to replace fossil fuels with
electricity, that is aimed at the fishing fleet was considered by the
team, to be innovative. Fishing vessels are the biggest contributor
to CO2 emissions, and the Government encourages them to
use electricity instead of fuel when they are in harbour. A total of
30 MWh/year could be used if all vessels used electricity in harbour.
At present, a special tariff for electricity supplied to vessels in
harbour has led to the use of about 14 MWh, or about 50 per cent of
the potential.
31. A working group that will assess options for reducing
emissions from the fisheries and that is mentioned in the
communication, was to be convened for the first time days after the
team's visit. The team noted that one feature of the general fishing
policy of Iceland is the use of individually transferable quotas
(ITQs). This leads to fewer boats being used to obtain the same
catch, and correspondingly less use of energy. However, it may also
lead to more boats being available for deep-sea fishing, which could
be more energy-consuming.
32. With regard to onshore transportation, which generates
35 per cent of carbon dioxide emissions, the team noted that the
central and local governments are making several efforts. As already
mentioned, the taxation of vehicles and fuels is under review. At
present, vehicle tax rates are 30 to 65 per cent of the value,
depending on engine capacity, plus a 25 per cent value added tax and
an annual tax based on weight. Assuming that revenues should not be
dramatically changed, it is expected that fuel taxes will rise and
vehicle taxes fall. It will take some time to develop and implement
the changes; for example, changes in diesel taxation have been
postponed until 1 January 1998. The possibility of having a sizeable
share of the vehicle fleet based on alternative fuels or electricity
is not considered feasible in the near or medium term, although the
team notes that there could technical scope for electrical
trolleybuses in the capital area.
33. The Government intends to launch a comprehensive
master plan for land use, the main aim of which will be to bring soil
erosion under control. It will also include several aspects of
climate change, however, including public transport, the main
transport system and future patterns of industrial development, land
reclamation, soil conservation, afforestation and even the location
and scope of future power projects. The plan is to be drafted under
the auspices of the Ministry of the Environment and other ministries.
The Ministry of Transport will establish a special working group, in
consultation with the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of
Trade, to lay the groundwork for the overall organization of
transport in Iceland with regard to environment and energy questions.
Local governments have a responsibility for public transport and for
implementing physical planning measures, and the team was shown
examples of town planning which take into account the needs of
cyclists and pedestrians in Reykjavik. Especially outside the
Reykjavik area there is limited scope for economic public
transport.
B. Methane
34. The national Government has taken several measures in
the waste sector which are expected to reduce methane emissions
significantly. It aims at achieving a 50 per cent reduction in waste
disposal by 2000 by reducing the amount of packaging, and increasing
recycling and composting. Here the major challenge is likely to be in
promoting public awareness and participation, and both central and
local governments are active in this connection. The recycling
programme emphasizes source separation, and recovered materials will
be recycled or composted. In Reykjavik, where over half of Iceland's
population lives, these measures are expected to bring about a sharp
fall in methane emissions. As discussed in the inventory section,
there are considerable uncertainties regarding the monitoring of this
activity, given the incomplete information on the generation,
collection, transport and disposal of waste around 1990 and earlier.
Both the quantitative target (of a 50 per cent reduction in waste
disposal) and the qualitative targets of improved collection and
recycling should, of course, be kept under review. There has also
been progress on two other measures mentioned in the communication;
as of 1996, open incineration of wastes is banned (only one small
site being left), and equipment to capture methane was installed at
Reykjavik's Alfsnes landfill in late 96. The latter measure is
expected to reduce the emissions by 3000 tonnes. The team also noted
that the ferrosilicon plant utilizes waste wood in partial
replacement of coal, which reduces both methane and CO2
emissions.
35. For the most part Iceland's livestock - largely sheep,
cattle and horses - are
free-ranging. Opportunities to directly control methane
emissions, both from livestock waste and from enteric fermentation,
are thus limited. However, under the land reclamation programme,
Iceland is beginning to change its livestock management patterns. The
Ministry of Agriculture is implementing a policy to reduce
subsidization of livestock farming. This policy, combined with
outreach efforts to alert farmers to the dangers of overgrazing, has
the potential to both reduce the number of livestock on the Island
and alter grazing patterns. The potential to reduce emissions from
livestock may be greater in the future because of increased pressure
on grazing activities as a result of national concerns about soil
erosion.
C. Nitrous oxide
36. The primary sources of N2O emissions are
fertilizers and automobiles. Measures aimed at reducing
CO2 emissions from the transportation sector will also
control N2O emissions. These include fuel and vehicle
taxes and efforts to increase the use of public
transport.
D. Other greenhouse gases
37. The team took note of the reductions that have been
achieved in PFC emissions as a result of measures taken at the
aluminium plant since 1990. The Ministry of the Environment continues
to work closely with the aluminum plant to ensure that the production
of fluorocarbons during the smelting process is reduced to the
technical minimum. It noted that, consideration is being given to
including conditions concerning emissions of such gases when permits
for new plants are being granted, primarily to ensure that new plants
would have similar performance. This would not be necessary, however,
if this level of performance is reached on a voluntary basis. The
ministry has also introduced a new regulation to control and limit
the projected growth in HFCs, PFCs and sulphur hexafluoride
SF6 as replacements for substances controlled by the
Montreal Protocol. If passed, the regulation would limit the
importation of HFCs to coolants, while fluorocarbon use (and import,
for example, for fire extinguishers) would be prohibited.
SF6 use would be limited to electrical equipment for which
no alternative gases are available. The Ministry plans to use direct
regulations to implement and enforce these regulations.
E. Precursors
38. Iceland is a Party to the United Nations Economic
Commission for Europe Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air
Pollution, but it is not a Party to the NOx and sulphur
protocols. Because of its location and low population, Iceland does
not have problems with regional transboundary air pollution and
contributes only marginally to it; local pollution is also limited.
The primary sources of NOx, CO and NMVOC emissions are
fossil fuel combustion in the transport and, in particular, the
fishing sectors. Iceland has implemented several mitigating measures
in the transport sector. Since 1992, all new vehicles sold in the
country must be equipped with catalytic converters. In conjunction
with this new law, an annual vehicle emissions testing programme was
implemented. Efforts made by the City of Reykjavik to encourage
people to use public transport will also reduce emissions. Reduction
measures for NOx emissions will be considered by the
working group established to investigate options in the fishing
sector. The Ministry of Transport has initiated the use of
alternatives to turpentine as a solvent on roadways and is seeking
ways to reduce the volume of solvent applied annually. Plastic spray
paint instead of paint with large amounts of solvents is also used.
Measures that reduce the use of fossil fuels in the fishing fleet
will also reduce the precursor emissions.
F. Land-use change and forestry
39. Land reclamation is a high priority for Iceland and
the measures taken have significant potential to enhance carbon
sequestration over time. The Government has introduced measures that
will increase the sequestration of carbon dioxide in biomass. The
plan envisages sequestering 100,000 tonnes tons of carbon dioxide per
year by the year 2000. The measures include planting lupins, planting
grass and spreading fertilizer, as well as reforestation aimed at
commercial forestry. The total area affected by these measures
between 1991 and 1996 was 16,300 ha, which were estimated to
sequester 46,700 tonnes of carbon dioxide per annum at present,
including accumulation in low organic matter soils. If the current
rate of reclamation and reforestation is continued, it is estimated
that 77,000 tonnes would be sequestered in the year 2000. Further
action is therefore planned for the period 1997-2000, as
sequestration of an additional 22,200 tonnes would be needed to
fulfil the target. The Government has recently approved to fund
additional measures for fulfilling this target.
40. The team noted that a new soil conservation strategy
and special reclamation and afforestation plan is under preparation
and will be issued early in 1997. The plan is being prepared by the
Ministry of Agriculture in close collaboration with the Ministry of
the Environment. Important features are seen as being education and
public outreach to educate farmers and the public about the nature,
extent and control of land degradation. This emphasizes both land
reclamation techniques and grazing management. The team saw fencing
as an effective measure in this respect. The team noted that a
reduction of livestock subsidies is expected to result in a change in
land-use towards more commercial forestry. The team also noted the
important voluntary actions, by farmers and non-governmental
organizations, for example, to fight soil erosion and enhance
reforestation.
IV. PROJECTIONS AND EFFECTS OF POLICIES AND
MEASURES
41. Iceland's communication included projections of the
greenhouse gases CO2, CH4,
N2O, PFCs and HFCs as well as the precursors CO,
NOx and NMVOCs. Owing to the lack of quantitative
information, projections for the land-use change and forestry sector
were not made. The projections are given according to the IPCC
categories and are consistent with the inventories, and the scenarios
for the various gases are also internally consistent, even if
different methodologies had to be used to carry them out. They are
also consistent with expected economic development in the near term.
During the visit, revised data were given for most gases, taking into
account recent developments.
42. The projections of GHG emissions are based on
materials produced by the Energy Forecast Committee. This is an
expert group made up of various interested parties
(including stakeholders) which uses a comprehensive
technical approach to project the development of energy demand and
supply. The team found the approach reasonable, especially given the
size and characteristics of the Icelandic energy system. The
projections given in the communication, as well as the updated ones,
do not include the effects of those parts of the action plan that had
not been implemented at the time the projections were
made.
43. The projections in the communication show an increase
in CO2 emissions of about 5 per cent in 2000 compared to
1990. The revised data increased this estimate to about 14.4 per
cent. The main source of this growth is the transport sector,
including fisheries. The team noted that implementation of some
additional measures could reduce this growth. A 60,000 tonne increase
in the production capacity of the existing aluminium smelter (which
was 87, 000 tonnes in 1990) is under way and is included in the
projections. However, these do not include additional emissions from
other industrial developments that were under consideration at the
time of the team's visit. It is expected that investors will decide
in 1997 whether or not to construct another aluminium plant. The
plant in question would initially have a capacity of 60,000 tonnes
and could be built before the turn of the century. The production
capacity of ferrosilicon could also be increased by 100,000 tonnes
(from an actual production level of 62,000 tonnes in 1990). All of
this could more than double the smelting capacity and thus the amount
of emissions generated by industrial processes alone. It could
increase national emissions by 10-20 per cent. The team noted that
the Government would not count such developments as emissions of
greenhouse gases from traditional industries and economic activities
and thus not relate them to the achievement of the aim of ensuring
that total emissions greenhouse gases in the year 2000 will not
exceed the 1990 total.
44. Such industrial developments would need to be supplied
by electric power. Until new generating capacity is added, this could
mean that less interruptable (or occasional) power will be available,
including interruptable power for fishmeal factories. This could
increase the use of oil by those consumers who have the choice, and
hence further increase emissions. The projection of traffic emissions
assumes the same vehicle fleet structure as today. A further
uncertainty is the development of the deep-sea fisheries, which
currently employ part of the fishing fleet. If this fleet is employed
in local waters, emissions could be reduced. In the longer term,
emissions will also depend on the use of factory trawlers, which
freeze fish using energy from oil, rather than delivering the catch
to onshore factories that may use electricity generated from
renewable sources.
45. Methane emissions are projected to decrease by 8 per
cent between 1990 and 2000, to a level already achieved in 1995. The
most significant factor in this reduction is recent changes in waste
management practices, primarily in the Reykjavik area, given that
this is where the majority of waste is generated. There is still some
uncertainty relating to the extent of these effects, because of the
limited knowledge of the composition of the waste stream and
conditions in the landfills, in addition to the uncertainties created
by the voluntary nature of the Government's waste programme, which
aims to reduce the waste stream by 50 per cent by 2000. In addition,
there could be a further reduction in emissions as a consequence of
the capture and utilization of landfill gas. Equipment was installed
at the biggest landfill near Reykjavik shortly after the team's visit
and this alone could reduce total methane emissions by 10-20 per
cent. Emissions from agriculture, where a small decrease is
projected, will largely follow the number of livestock. Cattle and
sheep populations have already decreased; the number of cattle is now
expected to remain stable while the number of sheep could drop
further. It is unclear how the relatively big horse population will
develop. The team noted that ongoing efforts to reclaim wetlands will
likely increase methane emissions, but also increase CO2
sequestration, although no estimates were provided.
46. Based on revised figures, emissions of nitrous oxide
are projected to remain virtually stable to 2000 but they may be
boosted by the fact that since 1992 new automobiles have had required
to be equipped with catalytic converters. The emissions from
agriculture are expected to remain relatively stable, although an
increase in fertilizer application is also expected in conjunction
with Iceland's comprehensive land reclamation plan. As explained in
the inventory section of this report, both historical and projected
emissions from the agricultural sector are probably overestimated.
Thus emissions from transport, which represent 10 per cent of total
N20 emissions in the current 1990 inventory, would become
relatively more important. Overall, nitrous oxide emissions will
remain a small proportion of Iceland's GHG emissions.
47. Emissions of PFCs, which represented around 9 per cent
of GHG emissions (0.045 Gg) in 1990, were reduced to 0.008 Gg by
1995, which is the figure given for 2000 in the communication. This
is seen as been close to the technical minimum. Revised projections
estimate the emissions for 2000 at 0.013 Gg, reflecting the increased
capacity being added to the existing aluminium smelter. Possible
further increases in aluminium production are not included, but even
with such developments these emissions are expected to remain well
below 1990 levels. Implementing the Montreal Protocol, Iceland is
phasing out the use of CFCs and replacing them with HFCs. Revised
projections for 2000 show HFC use at 0.040 Gg, twice the figure
quoted in the communication and representing 3.5 per cent of national
emissions. However, as fishing vessels can continue to use CFCs for
some years, there is still considerable room for reduction, possibly
up to 0.12 Gg, as these vessels will start to use replacement
substances around 2000. More shipboard freezing could lead to even
higher growth in HFC emissions in future years.
48. While the figures reported in the communication imply
an aggregate reduction of
4 per cent of all emissions outside the land-use change
and forestry sector, the revised projections indicate a 6 per cent
growth. The team realizes that the uncertainties go in both
directions, but feels that some developments that would increase
emissions further could be dominant. Consequently, stabilization
could depend the effective implementation of additional measures. The
team also notes that a better understanding of emissions of
CH4, N2O and PFCs may lead to revisions that
could significantly change the overall emission picture.
A. Carbon dioxide sequestration in biomass
49. No projections were given for carbon sequestration in
biomass. The team notes that a main determinant in carbon
sequestration is the grazing practices. However, existing programmes
administered by the Ministry of Agriculture aim to increase carbon
sequestration by biomass to 100,000 tonnes by the year 2000. It is
estimated that current efforts and current rates of afforestation and
land reclamation will yield a net increase in carbon sequestration of
77,800 tonnes by 2000. The Government has decided to devote
additional resources to the land reclamation project over the next
four years to meet the projected gap of 22,200 tonnes. Achievement of
this aim would imply that stabilization could be closer on a net
basis, adding sources and sinks.
B. Precursors
50. According to the communication, both NOx
and CO emissions are projected to fall, while NMVOCs are projected to
remain stable. In the revised projections, NOx emissions
are now projected to grow by 13 per cent between 1990 and 2000,
primarily because of a projected increase in the number and activity
of fishing vessels. Catalytic converters and other measures
significantly reduce emissions from the onshore transport sector,
although this is partly offset by increased transportation. CO
emissions are projected to decrease by over 26 per cent. Most of this
reduction is expected to come from improved vehicle emission control
measures. However, it could be offset by increased CO emissions from
fishing vessels. NMVOCS are projected to approximately stabilize.
However, expansion and improvement of roadways may increase the
application of solvents and lead to a corresponding increase in NMVOC
emissions, depending on the technical solutions chosen.
C. Effects of measures
51. The communication does not contain a specific estimate
of the effects of measures, but only a general assessment of some
measures or packages of measures. During the visit, information on
this issue was given in qualitative rather than quantitative terms.
The projections provided incorporated the projected effects of
policies and measures which the Government has taken since 1990,
while a pure "without measures" scenarios had not been carried
out.
V. EXPECTED IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE
AND ADAPTATION MEASURES
52. Iceland has a high degree of climate variability,
which the society is adapted to. Still the economy is very dependent
on natural resources, first and foremost fish stocks, so conditions
in the sea are crucial to development. Sea currents and temperature
determine breeding and the availability of nutrients, and even small
changes in the longer-term patterns could have significant impacts on
the size, composition and availability of the fish stocks.
Agriculture, where some crops are farmed under marginal conditions,
could also be considerably affected by limited changes. Some types of
possible developments would also affect the conditions for transport,
in particular by air. The need for a wider understanding of possible
impacts was acknowledged.
53. The effects of an enhanced greenhouse effect in the
North Atlantic area are highly uncertain, and in a general scenario
of global warming both warming and cooling could be possible, as well
as other effects. Given the general uncertainty, the impact of global
warming on the fish population is still poorly understood, what makes
an assessment of adaptation measures difficult. As an example, in
cold years, the continental shelf north of Iceland is less
productive, and there is a strong correlation between the influence
of Atlantic water and the weight of capelin. Together with the other
Nordic countries, Iceland has made an assessment of the possible
effects on hydrology and thus the availability of economically
important hydropower. Still, in particular given that the
uncertainties go in different directions, no specific adaptation
measures have been undertaken.
54. If Iceland wants to arrive at a more detailed
assessment of possible impacts, the team felt it could be useful to
develop scenarios to assess the possible changes in crop production,
bioproduction and weather conditions, based on paleoclimatic
reconstructions using existing models as well as using historical and
paleogeographical data.
VI. RESEARCH AND SYSTEMATIC
OBSERVATION
55. The communication focuses on monitoring and
contributions from the natural sciences. The team noted that there
has been more monitoring of physical, chemical and biological
processes in the Northern Atlantic Sea as well as the Arctic Area.
Monitoring and understanding ocean currents, food chains etc. is
vital for understanding the basis of the Icelandic economy and of
possible impacts of climate change. International efforts are
financed and carried out by countries on both sides of the Atlantic,
with active participation by Iceland. The Ministry of Agriculture has
embarked on collecting the necessary information to combat land
degradation, inter alia, through the compilation of a map of
soil erosion using satellite imagery (scale 1:100,000). Given
Iceland's limited size and financial resources, international
cooperation is crucial and Iceland is taking an increasingly active
part in the relevant forums. In this respect, participation in the
research programmes of the
European Union, which are open also to countries of the
European Free Trade Area, is seen as increasingly important. Iceland
is also involved in Nordic research cooperation, for example on the
air-sea flux of CO2 in the Nordic seas.
56. Due to its geographical characteristics, Iceland has a
large meteorology service relative to the population size, with about
130 observation posts some of which have provided long time series.
Over the last decades, atmospheric chemistry has also been monitored,
as well as changes in Iceland's terrestrial ecosystems, including
vegetation and soil erosion.
57. Compared to other countries, Iceland has historically
spent relatively little on research and development as a percentage
of GDP. Over the last decade, expenditure has rapidly increased,
however, as has the involvement of industry. The research system has
also been reorganized, and there is now one research council funding
both basic and applied research. Funding of applied projects is
allocated according to economic sectors whereas basic research
funding is allocated according to discipline; in both cases, projects
relating to climate change must compete on these conditions. Energy
research focuses almost exclusively on hydro and geothermal sources;
there is a long tradition of such research, which has enjoyed an
increase in funding in recent years.
VII. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AND TECHNOLOGY
TRANSFER
58. Iceland has not contributed to the Global Environment
Facility (GEF), either in the pilot phase or in the first
replenishment. The team was not made aware of any concrete action to
change this situation. Official development assistance (ODA) was
about 0.1 per cent of GDP in 1994. The Government has stated that it
intends to increase ODA to between 0.3 and 0.4 per cent of GDP.
However, in the light of recent across-the-board budget cuts, such an
increase was not seen as likely to materialize in the near
future.
59. There are some projects in the energy sector that are
of relevance to UNFCCC. In particular, Iceland is the host and
finances 80 per cent of the United Nations University Geothermal
Training Programme. Further, Iceland's unique expertise in using
geothermal energy is applied in bilateral projects in Eastern Europe
(e.g. Slovakia, Baltic countries) and Asia (e.g. China).
60. Iceland is developing concepts for activities
implemented jointly (AIJ) through the Nordic Council of Ministers,
but it does not participate in any pilot projects.
IX. EDUCATION, TRAINING AND PUBLIC
AWARENESS
61. The communication is brief on the issue of education,
training and public awareness, and stresses on the need to do more. A
government poll on awareness of climate change conducted in 1993,
revealed that a majority of the respondents had some knowledge of the
subject. In 1994, the Ministry of the Environment produced a pamphlet
for use in schools. It is up to the school authorities and teachers
to integrate any information relevant to climate change in basic
education, but an increasing demand is recognized and a textbook on
environmental issues for the secondary level was made available in
Iceland this year. In 1996, a pamphlet aimed at informing households
was issued. The Ministry also uses the press to spread
information.
62. The team noted that an advantage of having a small
government administration appears to be that knowledge of climate
change issues is not the reserve of specialists. Rather, all levels
of the relevant parts of the administration need to have a good
understanding of climate change, its impacts and the mitigation
options related to the sector.
63. The Ministry has also supported development of
information by environmental non-governmental organizations. In
particular regarding the regeneration of vegetation, there are
considerable activities, although these are not primarily aimed at
carbon sequestration, which is more of a byproduct. The team also
notes that the close interaction with business associations in
developing policy, through for example hearings, also contributes to
spreading awareness in these circles. There is also interaction
between some environmental organizations and relevant
ministries.
- - - - -
1. 1 In accordance with
decision 2/CP.1 of the Conference of the Parties, the full draft of
this report was communicated to the Government of Iceland, which had
no further comments.