Distr.

GENERAL



FCCC/SB/1999/8

28 September 1999



Original: ENGLISH


SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE

Eleventh session

Bonn, 25 October - 5 November 1999

Item 6 of the provisional agenda



SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Eleventh session

Bonn, 25 October - 5 November 1999

Item 6 of the provisional agenda



 

MECHANISMS PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 6, 12 AND 17

 

OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL



 

Synthesis of proposals by Parties on principles, modalities, rules and guidelines



 

Note by the Chairmen

 

 

CONTENTS



Paragraphs Page

Introduction 1 - 18 5



A. Mandate 1 - 3 5

B. Scope of the note 4 - 6 5

C. Approach 7 - 16 6

D. Possible action by the SBSTA and the SBI 17 - 18 7



GE.99-



Paragraphs Page



PART ONE: DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS 19 - 23 8



PART TWO: ARTICLE 6 PROJECTS 24 - 60 11

 

I. NATURE AND SCOPE 24 - 33 11



A. Purpose 24 - 25 11

B. Principles 26 11

C. Supplementarity 27 - 28 12

D. Participation 29 - 32 13

E. Share of proceeds 33 14



II. METHODOLOGICAL AND OPERATIONAL ISSUES 34 - 55 14



A. Project approval/validation 34 - 37 14

B. Project monitoring 38 16

C. Project verification 39 - 40 16

D. Certification/issuance of ERUs 41 - 43 16

E. Issues related to compliance 44 - 45 17

F. Registries 46 - 51 18

G. Reporting by Parties 52 - 55 18



III. INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES 56 - 60 19



Appendices to Part Two 21



A. Baselines 21

B. Monitoring, reporting,

verification and certification/issuance of ERUs 21

C. Registries 21



Paragraphs Page



PART THREE: CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM 61 - 146 22



I. NATURE AND SCOPE 61 - 78 22



A. Purpose 61 - 62 22

B. Principles 63 22

C. "Part of"/supplementarity 64 23

D. Participation 65 - 73 24

E. Share of proceeds 74 - 78 26



II. METHODOLOGICAL AND OPERATIONAL ISSUES 79 - 125 27



A. Project validation/registration 79 - 94 27

B. Project financing 95 - 100 31

C. Project monitoring 101 - 103 32

D. Project verification 104 - 106 32

E. Certification/issuance of CERs 107 - 113 33

F. Issues related to compliance 114 - 116 35

G. Adaptation assistance 117 - 122 35

H. Registries 123 36

I. Reporting by Parties 124 - 125 36



III. INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES 126 - 146 37



A. Role of the COP/MOP 126 - 129 37

B. Executive board 130 - 137 38

C. Operational entities 138 - 140 41

D. Parties 141 - 142 42

E. Administrative support 143 - 145 43

F. Review 146 43



Appendices to Part Three 45

verification and certification/issuance of CERs 45

Paragraphs Page



PART FOUR: EMISSIONS TRADING 147 - 185 46



I. NATURE AND SCOPE 147 - 157 46



A. Purpose 147 - 148 46

B. Principles 149 46

C. Supplementarity 150 - 151 47

D. Participation 152 - 156 48

E. Share of proceeds 157 50



II. METHODOLOGICAL AND OPERATIONAL ISSUES 158 - 177 50



A. Modalities of operation 158 - 161 50

B. Verification 162 - 164 51

C. Issues related to compliance 165 - 169 52

D. Registries 170 - 175 53

E. Reporting by Parties 176 - 177 54



III. INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES 178 - 185 55



A. Role of the COP and/or the COP/MOP 178 - 180 55

B. Parties 181 55

C. Administrative support 182 - 183 56

D. Review 184 - 185 56



Appendices to Part Four 57





Annexes



I. Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol 58



II. Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol 59



III. Article 17 of the Kyoto Protocol 61



IV. Code of sources 62



Introduction



 

A. Mandate



1. The Conference of the Parties (COP), at its fourth session, by its decision 7/CP.4, adopted a work programme on the mechanisms under Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Kyoto Protocol with a view to taking decisions at its sixth session, including, where appropriate, recommendations to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Protocol (COP/MOP), at its first session, on principles, modalities, rules and guidelines (FCCC/CP/1998/16/Add.1).



2. The Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) and the Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI), at their tenth sessions, having considered the first synthesis of proposals on the mechanisms, invited Parties to submit further proposals, by 31 July 1999, on issues raised in decision 7/CP.4, paragraph 1 (FCCC/SBSTA/1999/6). They also requested the Chairmen to prepare, with the assistance of the secretariat, a revised and consolidated synthesis of proposals, identified by sources, for consideration at their eleventh sessions. This synthesis of proposals was to take into account decision 7/CP.4, views by Parties on the first synthesis of proposals at the tenth session of the subsidiary bodies, and further proposals by Parties.



3. Submissions received prior to and during the tenth sessions of the subsidiary bodies are contained in document FCCC/SB/1999/MISC.3 and its addenda. Further proposals are contained in document FCCC/SB/1999/MISC.10. Later proposals, which could not be taken into account in this document, are contained in document FCCC/SB/1999/MISC.10/Add.1.



B. Scope of the note



4. This note by the Chairmen responds to the above request. There are four parts and four annexes to this document. The first part presents a synthesis of definitions and abbreviations which are used throughout this document. The subsequent three parts contain syntheses of proposals by Parties on the principles, modalities, rules and guidelines, as appropriate, for each of the mechanisms under Article 6 (referred to by some Parties as "joint implementation" (JI)), Article 12 (the clean development mechanism (CDM)) and Article 17 (emissions trading) of the Kyoto Protocol.



5. Throughout the document, references are made to issues being addressed in other areas of work. Parties may wish, in particular, to consider this document in the light of SBSTA and SBI provisional agenda item 4 (Procedures and mechanisms relating to compliance under the Kyoto Protocol), item 5 (Activities implemented jointly under the pilot phase) and item 7 (Capacity-building) and SBSTA provisional agenda item 8 (b) (National systems, adjustments and guidelines under Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Kyoto Protocol) and item 9 (a) (Land-use, land-use change and forestry).



6. The subsidiary bodies, also at their tenth sessions, requested the secretariat to prepare a revised plan for facilitating capacity-building related to the mechanisms. The proposed revised plan is contained in document FCCC/SB/1999/6, to be considered under item 7 (capacity-building) of the SBSTA and SBI provisional agendas. Views by Parties on capacity-building are reflected in that document and not in this note. Proposals by Parties in relation to capacity-building are contained in documents FCCC/SB/1999/MISC.9 and FCCC/SB/1999/MISC.11.



C. Approach



7. As requested by the subsidiary bodies at their tenth sessions, a revised and consolidated synthesis of proposals has been elaborated. In light of suggestions made by the Parties during those sessions on structure, parts two to four of this document address three major areas for each mechanism:



- nature and scope;

- methodological and operational issues; and

- institutional issues.



8. "Nature and scope" addresses, inter alia, the purpose, principles and scope of each mechanism. Elements contained in the general part of the annex to decision 7/CP.4 are reflected mostly in this section, without prejudging the commonality or otherwise of these issues.



9. "Methodological and operational issues" addresses issues such as the validation, monitoring, verification and certification of project activities, as well as registries and reporting.



10. "Institutional issues" refers, inter alia, to the role of the COP and the COP/MOP, the CDM executive board, operational and other entities, and review procedures, as appropriate.



11. This document does not contain substantive inputs to the appendices foreseen for each of the mechanisms. Such appendices may be useful for addressing technical issues, such as the design of baselines and the determination of additionality under Articles 6 and 12, and registries.



12. The proposals by Parties are allocated to elements within the structure for each mechanism. The text has been synthesized where convergence between Parties' views seems apparent. Diverging positions are represented with bracketed text or, when necessary, with alternative paragraph options. While every effort was made to reflect the substance of Parties' proposals, editorial changes were made where they appeared warranted.



13. The sources of proposals are identified by a code using superscript numbers, in accordance with the list contained in annex 4 to this document. Where a Party proposed the general substance of the full sentence, numbers were put at the end of those sentences. Where a Party proposed the substance of a part of a sentence, numbers follow the relevant clauses or brackets. This also applies to text from the Kyoto Protocol and to proposals by the Chairmen.



14. In parts two and four, on Article 6 projects and emissions trading respectively, proposals to address supplementarity have been divided into proposals to limit acquisitions and proposals to limit transfers. This was done to facilitate the comparison of proposals. In part three on the CDM, only proposals to limit acquisitions are presented.



15. In a number of areas no substantive proposals were received. This applies, inter alia, to issues related to compliance, including any implications of a Party being a member of an agreement under Article 4 and any need to avoid inconsistency between rules on the mechanisms and those of the World Trade Organization.



16. Proposals by Parties relating to timing and procedural issues in regard to the work programme on mechanisms are not addressed in this document. Parties are instead referred to documents FCCC/SB/1999/MISC.3 and FCCC/SB/1999/MISC.10 and their addenda.



D. Possible action by the SBSTA and the SBI



17. The subsidiary bodies may wish to recommend to the Conference of the Parties that it take note of this document and



(a) Request the Chairmen of the subsidiary bodies to prepare, on its basis and taking into account the views expressed by Parties at the eleventh session of the subsidiary bodies and the fifth session of the Conference of the Parties, as well as further views submitted by Parties by 31 January 2000, a draft negotiating text on the principles, modalities, rules and guidelines for the mechanisms for consideration at the twelfth sessions of the subsidiary bodies;



(b) Invite Parties to make further proposals, in particular on issues related to the appendices for each mechanism, to be issued as a miscellaneous document; and



(c) Request the secretariat to support the Chairmen of the subsidiary bodies in preparing the draft negotiating text and to organize, in this context, a workshop on mechanisms to be held in March/April 2000, provided sufficient funding for this purpose is available in a timely manner.



18. The subsidiary bodies may further wish to recommend to the Conference of the Parties, at its fifth session, that it provide further guidance to the Chairmen on how to proceed with the work programme on mechanisms under decision 7/CP.4, to be undertaken with priority given to the clean development mechanism, including the development of appendices, with a view to decisions being taken on all the mechanisms under Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Kyoto Protocol at the sixth session of the COP, including, where appropriate, recommendations to the COP/MOP at its first session.

PART ONE



DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS



19. For the purposes of this [rule] [annex], the definitions contained in Article 1 of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Convention) and Article 1 of the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention on Climate Change (Protocol) shall apply2.



20. In addition, in relation to the Convention and the Protocol2:



(a) 'Article' means an Article of the Protocol, unless otherwise indicated4.



(b) 'Assigned amount' for each Party included in Annex I is that amount defined in Article 3, paragraph 7, and Annex B to the Protocol2.



(c) A 'clean development mechanism' (CDM) is defined in Article 121,4.



(d) 'COP' refers to the Conference of the Parties to the Convention2.



(e) 'COP/MOP' refers to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Protocol4.



(f) 'Mechanism' refers to instruments established under Articles 6, 12 and 172.



21. In addition, in relation to actors2:



(a) 'Executive board' refers to the entity supervising the CDM2.



(b) [An 'independent entity' ...10]2



(c) 'Legal entities' are those entities referred to in Article 6, paragraph 32.



(d) An 'operational entity' is a public or private entity [designated by the COP/MOP1] [accredited by the executive board4] to [validate10] [register4] [present12] CDM project activities, certify reductions in emissions by sources [and/or enhancements of removals by sinks4], and undertake other responsibilities as specified4.



(e) ['Participant'4] ['Proponent'2] means a Party, a private or public entity resident in a Party, or both, that has entered into a contractual agreement [on4] [to implement2] a CDM project activity4.



(f) 'Private and/or public entities' are those entities referred to in Article 12, paragraph 92.

22. In addition, in relation to units2:



(a) An 'emission reduction unit' (ERU) shall be equal to one metric ton of CO2 equivalent emissions [reduced or sequestered24] arising from an Article 6 project, calculated using the global warming potentials (GWPs) defined by decision 2/CP.3 or as subsequently revised in accordance with Article 54,10,24. Each ERU shall have a unique serial number from which it will be possible to determine the Party of origin, the project, the year of [issuance4] [certification10], [and the certifying entity10], [and shall be trackable through the registry system4]4,10,18.



(b) A 'certified emission reduction' (CER) unit shall be equal to one metric ton of CO2 equivalent emissions [reduced or sequestered24] arising from a CDM project, calculated using the GWPs defined by decision 2/CP.3 or as subsequently revised in accordance with Article 54,10,24. Each CER shall have a unique serial number from which it will be possible to determine the Party of origin, the project, the year of [issuance4] [certification10], [and the certifying entity10,4], [and shall be trackable through the registry system4]4,10,18.



(c) An 'assigned amount unit' (AAU) shall be equal to one metric ton of carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalent emissions calculated using the GWPs defined by decision 2/CP.3 or as subsequently revised in accordance with Article 54,10,19,24. Each AAU shall have a unique serial number from which it will be possible to determine the Party of origin and the commitment period for which the unit was issued [and shall be trackable through the registry system4]4,10.



(d) Excess AAUs are those AAUs that have been certified and can be transferred or acquired under Article 1724.



23. In addition, in relation to functions2:



(a) 'Certification' is the binding assessment by an independent or operational entity upon request of a project participant of how many additional, real, measurable and long-term emission reductions have resulted from a validated project activity10.



(b) ['Issuance' of CERs is the function assumed by the executive board on the basis of verification reports24.]



(c) Option 1: 'Validation' is the binding assessment by an independent or operational entity, upon request of a project participant, that a specific project activity under Articles 6 or 12 meets the requirements laid down in the rules in the Protocol and in the Convention10.



Option 2: '[Validation10] [registration4] [presentation12]' is the process by which a project is approved according to the purposes and eligibility criteria of the CDM2.



(d) Option 1: 'Verification' is the periodic assessment of emission reductions from a project2.



Option 2: 'Verification' refers to the review of [inventories,] [registries,] [reporting,] [systems] [and projects] to ensure integrity in the use of the mechanisms2.



PART TWO



ARTICLE 6 PROJECTS

 

 

I. NATURE AND SCOPE



 

A. Purpose



24. "For the purpose of meeting its commitments under Article 3, any Party included in Annex I may transfer to, or acquire from, any other such Party emission reduction units resulting from projects aimed at reducing anthropogenic emissions by sources or enhancing anthropogenic removals by sinks of greenhouse gases in any sector of the economy, provided that:



(a) Any such project has the approval of the Parties involved;



(b) Any such project provides a reduction in emissions by sources, or an enhancement of removals by sinks, that is additional to any that would otherwise occur;



(c) It does not acquire any emission reduction units if it is not in compliance with its obligations under Articles 5 and 7;



(d) The acquisition of emission reduction units shall be supplemental to domestic actions for the purposes of meeting commitments under Article 3."1



25. Any emission reduction units [from a verified joint implementation project10] which a Party acquires from another Party in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 shall be added to the assigned amount for the acquiring Party10,11. Any emission reduction units [from a verified joint implementation project10] which a Party transfers to another Party in accordance with the provisions of Article 6 shall be subtracted from the assigned amount for the transferring Party10,11.



 

B. Principles



26. In their actions to achieve the purpose of Article 6, the Parties shall be guided, inter alia, by:



(a) Article 3 of the Convention11;



(b) Equity3,13 between developed and developing country Parties13, including equity with respect to per capita greenhouse gas emissions13, so as to not perpetuate existing inequities between Parties included in Annex I and developing country Parties13;



(c) Climate change effectiveness (i.e. real, measurable and long-term benefits related to mitigation of climate change are to be achieved)10,11,13;



(d) Transparency11;



(e) Cost-effectiveness (i.e. global benefits are to be achieved at the lowest cost)4,10;



(f) Additionality in accordance with Article 6, paragraph 1 (b)2;



(g) Option 1: The concept of 'fungibility' among the three mechanisms of the Protocol is totally unacceptable6.



Option 2: Acquired AAUs, ERUs and CERs can be used to fulfil a Party's own obligations or be the object of further trade18.



C. Supplementarity



Limits on acquisitions



27. Option 1: Acquisitions of ERUs resulting from projects initiated under Article 6 shall be supplemental to domestic actions for the purpose of meeting a Party's quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under Article 314,21,22.



Option 2: Net acquisitions by a Party included in Annex I for all three mechanisms together must not exceed the higher of the following alternatives:



(a) 5 per cent of: its base year emissions multiplied by 5 plus its assigned amount

2



(where 'base year emissions' may be replaced by 'average annual emissions in the base period, as provided for in Article 3, paragraph 5')10;



(b) 50 per cent of: the difference between its annual actual emissions in any year of the period from 1994 to 2002, multiplied by 5, and its assigned amount10.



However, the ceiling on net acquisitions can be increased to the extent that a Party included in Annex I achieves emission reductions larger than the relevant ceiling in the commitment period through domestic action undertaken after 1993, if demonstrated by the Party in a verifiable manner and subject to the expert review process to be developed under Article 810.



Option 3: The overall 'cap' on the use of the three mechanisms should not exceed 25-30 per cent as a maximum20.



Option 4: No determination of the term "supplemental"4.



Limits on transfers



28. Option 1: Net transfers by a Party included in Annex I for all three mechanisms together must not exceed:



5 per cent of: its base year emissions multiplied by 5 plus its assigned amount

2



(where 'base year emissions' may be replaced by 'average annual emissions in the base period, as provided for in Article 3, paragraph 5')10.



However, the ceiling on net transfers can be increased to the extent that a Party included in Annex I achieves emission reductions larger than the relevant ceiling in the commitment period through domestic action undertaken after 1993, if demonstrated by the Party in a verifiable manner and subject to the expert review process to be developed under Article 810.



Option 2: The overall 'cap' on the use of the three mechanisms should not exceed 25-30 per cent as a maximum20.



Option 3: No determination of the term "supplemental"4.



 

D. Participation



29. Option 1: A Party included in Annex I that does not:



(a) Comply with its obligations under Articles 5 and 7 may not acquire any ERUs resulting from projects under Article 64;



(b) Maintain a national registry in accordance with the provisions of these guidelines may not transfer or acquire ERUs resulting from projects under Article 64.



Option 2: Parties included in Annex I shall only transfer or acquire ERUs from a project under Article 6, if they:



(a) Have ratified the Protocol10;



(b) Are bound by a compliance regime adopted by the COP/MOP10;



(c) Have not been excluded from participation in Article 6 according to the procedures and mechanisms under the compliance regime10;



(d) Are in compliance with their commitments under Article 12 of the Convention10;



(e) Comply with Articles 2, 3, 5, 7 and 1018;



(f) Have in place a national policy for emission reduction and sink enhancement and have developed scenarios for emission reduction on both national and project scales18.



30. Legal entities [resident in a Party included in Annex I4] can participate in Article 6 with the approval of the Parties involved in such projects10. Participation of legal entities in Article 6 projects does not affect the responsibility of Parties included in Annex I for the fulfilment of their commitments under the Protocol4,10,18.



31. A Party included in Annex I may develop rules or guidance for the participation of that Party, and of legal entities resident in that Party, in projects under Article 64,18, [resulting from specific economic and social conditions of the country in question18].



32. If a Party's consistency with the requirements in the above paragraph is called into question [by the review process under Article 84] [by other means4], the issue will be expeditiously resolved [through a general procedure applicable to the Protocol4] [through a specialized procedure4]4.



(Note: The brackets in the above paragraph were submitted by Parties as options.)



 

E. Share of proceeds



33. A share of proceeds shall be used to cover administrative expenses as well as to assist developing country Parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change to meet the costs of adaptation3,5,7,8,17,21,25,26. The share of proceeds to assist in meeting adaptation costs shall be the same as for the provisions in Article 12, paragraph 87.



 

II. METHODOLOGICAL AND OPERATIONAL ISSUES



 

A. Project approval/validation



34. A project under Article 6 shall:



(a) Provide a reduction in emissions of one or more gases listed in Annex A of the Protocol by sources listed in Annex A of the Protocol, or an enhancement of removals by sinks, that is additional to any that would otherwise occur4,18. Enhancement of removals by sinks covers activities included in Article 3, paragraph 3, and any additional activities under Article 3, paragraph 44;



(b) Cover, as a priority, the sectors of combustion, industry, energy raw material processing and transportation, transport and municipal management18.



35. Option 1: A project under Article 6 shall be approved by the Parties involved4. A Party may develop its own internal mechanisms and criteria for project approval based on its domestic circumstances4.



Option 2: Independent entities shall validate the project upon request of a project participant10. A project needs to be validated before emission reductions resulting from that project may be certified10. A project shall be validated only if it meets the following requirements:



(a) The project has the approval of the Parties involved10,18,24, as indicated in statements of project approval submitted to the secretariat24;



(b) All legal entities authorized under Article 6, paragraph 3, which are involved in the project shall demonstrate that they are entitled to participate in Article 6 projects10 ;



(c) An [agreed24] baseline for the project shall be determined10,24 and submitted to the independent entity by the project participants10, in accordance with Appendix A10,24. The environmental additionality of the project shall be calculated on the basis of this baseline10. It must be demonstrated that the emission reductions from the project are real, measurable and long-term and that the emissions occurring with the project are lower than the emissions that would have occurred in the absence of the project10.



(d) A monitoring protocol shall be approved by the Parties involved24 containing information on procedures for accurate, systematic and periodic monitoring of the project in accordance with Appendix B10. This shall be provided to the independent entity10.



Independent entities shall publish their decisions on the validation of projects in a suitable manner10. Such entities shall be institutionally and economically independent from, and not entitled to participate in, the identification, development or financing of Article 6 projects10.



36. A project under the activities implemented jointly (AIJ) pilot phase will be eligible to be pursued as a project under Article 6 if the project meets the criteria established in these guidelines, and if the Parties involved in the project agree that it should be considered as an Article 6 project4.



37. Implementation of projects provided for in Article 6 should be commenced at the same time as CDM projects, on completion of the AIJ pilot phase but no later than after the first session of the COP/MOP18.



B. Project monitoring



38. The reporting process under Article 6 should be based on guidelines developed by the Convention bodies and as adopted by the COP18. This system should be based on existing guidelines for AIJ under the pilot phase18. Monitoring should cover not only emissions but also the cost-effectiveness of the project18. The provision and installation of measuring equipment should be envisaged during the project preparatory phase18. Monitoring must include also technical aspects (compliance between implemented and designed technology, etc.)18.



C. Project verification



39. Periodic reviews of project implementation should be carried out by expert teams appointed by the COP18.



40. Verification should be carried out on two levels by18:



(a) The donor and recipient country18;



(b) The COP/MOP, or by a body established by the COP/MOP, in order to verify all of the mechanisms18.



D. Certification/issuance of ERUs



41. Option 1: The Party in which the project site is located shall issue ERUs and transfer them to Parties and/or entities participating in the project4. ERUs shall be distributed among the project participants according to their agreement4.



Option 2: Certification and verification should be carried out at the international level by the same independent authority which is to perform this within the CDM mechanism, whereas at the national level this should be done by a non-governmental organization18.



Option 3: Independent entities shall certify the emission reductions resulting from a validated project upon request of a project participant10. Additional emission reductions resulting from a project shall be calculated on the basis of the baseline submitted to the independent entity in the course of the validation of the project10. They shall be certified after they have occurred, only if:



(a) A participant in the project applies for the certification of the emission reductions resulting from the project during a specific period of time10;



(b) The project has been validated and continues to meet the requirements for project validation10;



(c) All Parties involved are entitled to participate in Article 6 projects10;



(d) The applicant submits the necessary monitored data proving that:



(i) The project has resulted in additional emission reductions by sources, or an additional enhancement of removals by sinks10;



(ii) These emission reductions or enhancements of removals by sinks are real, measurable and long-term10.



Independent entities shall inform the applicant of their decision in writing immediately after the completion of the certification process10. Independent entities shall publish their decisions on the certification of emission reductions in a suitable manner10. Such entities shall be institutionally and economically independent from, and not entitled to participate in, the identification, development or financing of Article 6 projects10.



42. Issued certificates shall contain the following information and data:



(a) The project and the project participants, including the Parties involved10;



(b) The number of ERUs that have resulted from the project and their serial numbers10.



43. Monitoring data reported to the secretariat must demonstrate the environmental additionality of the project, which is indicated when actual emissions associated with the project are less than the emissions determined for its baseline24.



E. Issues related to compliance



44. Option 1: If a question of implementation by a Party included in Annex I of the requirements referred to in Article 6 is identified in accordance with the relevant provisions of Article 8, transfers and acquisitions of emission reduction units may continue to be made after the question has been identified, provided that any such units may not be used by a Party to meet its commitments under Article 3 until any issue of compliance is resolved1. Such a question shall be expeditiously resolved [through a general procedure applicable to the Protocol4] [through a specialized procedure4]4.



(Note: The brackets in the above paragraph were submitted by the Parties as options.)



Option 2: Any Party that is not in compliance with Article 6 may only transfer ERUs from a given project if the design of the project, including the definition of the baseline, has been validated and the ERUs generated have been certified by an independent third party in accordance with any guidelines issued by the COP/MOP24.



45. A Party operating under Article 4 [may4] [may not4] acquire any ERUs resulting from projects under Article 6 if another Party operating under the same Article 4 agreement, or if a regional economic integration organization to which the Party belongs and which is itself a Party to the Protocol, is found not to be in compliance with its obligations under Articles 5 and 74.



(Note: The matter in the above paragraph was raised by the Parties as an issue to be addressed, but not as a proposal.)



 

F. Registries



46. Option 1: Any Party participating in Article 6 project activities shall establish and maintain a national registry which accurately records all holdings, transfers, acquisitions and retirements of ERUs by the Party and its authorized legal entities4.



Option 2: A central registry shall be established with the aim of tracking the generation, transfer and retirement of AAUs, CERs and ERUs transferred under the Protocol mechanisms3.



47. Transfers and acquisitions of ERUs shall be made by removing units (identified by serial number) from the registry of the transferring Party and adding them to the registry of the acquiring Party4.



48. ERUs transferred or acquired during the period from the year 2000 up to the beginning of the first commitment period shall be accounted for according to Article 3, paragraphs 10 and 11 respectively24.



49. ERUs used by a Party toward meeting its commitment under Article 3, paragraph 1, shall be retired by that Party, in which case such units may not be further used or transferred. A record of all retired ERUs (identified by serial number) shall be kept by the Party in its registry4.



50. Information maintained in a national registry shall be publicly accessible4.



51. Any two or more Parties may voluntarily maintain their registries in a consolidated system, within which each registry would remain legally distinct4.



G. Reporting by Parties



52. Parties included in Annex I shall report annually on their projects under Article 6 within the framework of their reporting commitments under [Article 7, paragraphs 1 and 24,10,24] [Article 64].



53. Reporting under [Article 7, paragraph 14,24] [Article 64] will include information, in a standard format, on transfers and acquisitions of ERUs during that year, including, for each unit, its unique serial number and the name of the Party to whose registry it was transferred or from which it was acquired4,24. Transfers involving legal entities must also provide information on entities involved in the transaction24.



54. Reporting on these projects under Article 7, paragraph 2, shall be in accordance with the uniform reporting format, which shall be an integral part of the guidelines developed under Article 7, paragraph 424.



55. Information related to projects undertaken under Article 6 and reported under Article 7 [will be subject to the expert review process under Article 824] [reviewed in accordance with Article 6/8 and its guidelines and made public by the secretariat4]. Should a question of implementation by a Party included in Annex I and engaged in a project under Article 6 arise in the context of the expert review process, Article 6, paragraph 4, will apply24.



 

III. INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES



56. The COP/MOP shall:



(a) Serve as the supreme body of the global framework established under the Protocol3;



(b) Define the roles of verification and auditing entities, including private sector entities22;



(c) Issue guidelines for reporting by Parties on projects under Article 624;



(d) Issue guidelines for the certification of ERUs by an independent third party for cases where a Party is not in compliance with Article 6 but wishes to transfer ERUs from a validated project24;



(e) Issue guidelines for comparable methodologies for baseline determination24;



(f) Acknowledge the compliance of a Party with the Protocol, in particular the obligations provided by Articles 3, 5, 7 and 1018;



(g) Approve the results of an Article 6 project before credits can be transferred18.



57. The COP/MOP shall review the guidelines governing the joint implementation, with the first review to be carried out no later than the year 201210. Further reviews shall be carried out periodically thereafter10. Any revision of guidelines shall take effect in the commitment periods subsequent to that of their adoption.10



58. [Independent entities10] [operating authorities18] shall:



(a) Be institutionally and economically independent from, and not entitled to participate in, the identification, development or financing of Article 6 projects10;



(b) [Validate10] [approve18] a project under Article 6 upon request of a project participant and verify that it complies with relevant guidelines and principles18;



(c) Certify the emission reductions resulting from a validated project upon request of a project participant10;



(d) Have its decisions on Article 6 projects approved by the executive board of the CDM18.



59. A Party participating in Article 6 projects shall:



(a) Approve Article 6 projects4,10,18,24;



(b) Approve the participation of legal entities in an Article 6 project4,10,18;



(c) Maintain a national registry containing records of holdings, transfers and acquisitions of ERUs by the Party itself and legal entities resident in the Party4;



(d) Report annually on its projects under Article 6 within the framework of its reporting commitments4,10,24 under [Article 74,10,24] [Article 64].



60. A Party participating in Article 6 projects may:



(a) Develop rules or guidance for the participation in projects under Article 6 of that Party and of legal entities resident in that Party4,18;



(b) Develop its own internal mechanisms and criteria for project approval based on its domestic circumstances4,18.



Appendices to Part Two



APPENDIX A:



Baselines10



APPENDIX B:



Monitoring10, reporting4, verification4

and certification/issuance of ERUs 2,10



APPENDIX C:

 

Registries2



PART THREE



CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM



 

I. NATURE AND SCOPE



 

A. Purpose



61. The purpose of the CDM is:



(a) To assist Parties not included in Annex I in achieving sustainable development and in contributing to the ultimate objective of the Convention11,12,13,19;



(b) To assist Parties included in Annex I in achieving compliance with their quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under Article 311,12,13,19; and



(c) To assist developing country Parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change to meet the costs of adaptation by ensuring that a share of the proceeds of each project is assessed for this purpose3.



62. "Any certified emission reductions which a Party acquires from another Party in accordance with the provisions of Article 12 shall be added to the assigned amount for the acquiring Party"1,10,11.



 

B. Principles



63. In their actions to achieve the purpose of the CDM, the Parties shall be guided, inter alia, by:



(a) Article 3 of the Convention11;

 

(b) Equity3,11,13 between developed and developing country Parties13, including equity with respect to per capita greenhouse gas emissions13, based on equitable developmental rights and balanced regional activity11, so as to not perpetuate existing inequities between Parties included in Annex I and developing country Parties13;



(c) Climate change effectiveness (ie. real, measurable and long-term benefits related to the mitigation of climate change are to be achieved at the project level)7,11,13,18;



(d) Sustainable development7,11,12,13,19;



(e) Additionality in net environmental benefits7;



(f) Austerity and efficiency to minimize bureaucratic aspects12;



(g) Transparency11;



(h) Non-discrimination11;



(i) Prevention of distortion of competition11;



(j) Special needs of least developed countries11;



(k) Transfer of technology and financial resources to Parties not included in

Annex I12.



(l) Option 1: [The concept of 'fungibility' among the three mechanisms of the Protocol is totally unacceptable6.] [There is no link between Article 12, Article 6 and Article 17. The three Articles are mutually exclusive13.] [CERs may be acquired only by a Party included in Annex I to the Protocol and they are not tradable or transferable to another Party20.]



Option 2: [Acquired AAUs, ERUs and CERs can be used to fulfil a Party's own obligations or be the object of further trade18.] [CERs, in principle, can be fungible with ERUs and AAUs. However, the use of CERs in emissions trading needs to be further discussed through the rule-making process for the CDM19.]

 

C. "Part of"/ supplementarity



64. Option 1: "Parties included in Annex I may use certified emission reductions accruing from such project activities to contribute to compliance with part of their quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under Article 3, as determined by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol."1



Option 2: CDM project activities shall be supplemental to domestic actions by developed country Parties to meet part of their quantified emission limitation or reduction commitments11.



Option 3: Net acquisitions by a Party included in Annex I for all three mechanisms together must not exceed the higher of the following alternatives:



(a) 5 per cent of: its base year emissions multiplied by 5 plus its assigned amount

2



(where 'base year emissions' may be replaced by 'average annual emissions in the base period, as provided for in Article 3, paragraph5')10;



(b) 50 per cent of: the difference between its annual actual emissions in any year of the period from 1994 to 2002, multiplied by 5, and its assigned amount10.



However, the ceiling on net acquisitions can be increased to the extent that a Party included in Annex I achieves emission reductions larger than the relevant ceiling in the commitment period through domestic action undertaken after 1993, if demonstrated by the Party in a verifiable manner and subject to the expert review process to be developed under Article 810.



Option 4: The overall 'cap' on the use of the three mechanisms should not exceed 25-30 per cent as a maximum20.



Option 5: Parties included in Annex I may achieve up to 25 per cent of their quantified targets through CDM project activities7.



Option 6: No determination of the term "part of"4.



Option 7: Limits may be levied in the short-term on CERs used by Parties included in Annex I to meet the limitation and reduction commitments but, in the long-term, CERs may be freely utilized19.



 

D. Participation



65. Participation in a CDM project activity is voluntary7,13,18.



66. Option 1: A Party included in Annex I shall only use CERs to contribute to compliance if the Party:



(a) Has ratified the Protocol3,10,12,24;



(b) Is bound by a compliance regime adopted by the COP/MOP10,24;



(c) Has not been excluded from participation in the CDM according to the procedures and mechanisms under the compliance regime10,24;



(d) Has satisfied prescribed domestic effort in fulfilment of commitments under Articles 218 and 311,13;



(e) Is in compliance with its commitments under Articles 54,10,18 and 74,10,18 and under Article 12 of the Convention10,24;



(f) Is in compliance with all CDM rules and guidelines and relevant provisions in the Protocol3.



Option 2: A Party included in Annex I may not use CERs accruing from CDM project activities if that Party is found not to be in compliance with its obligations under Articles 5 and 74.



67. If a Party's consistency with the eligibility requirements is called into question [by the review process under Article 84] [by other means4], the issue will be expeditiously resolved [through a general procedure applicable to the Protocol4] [through a specialized procedure4]4.



(Note: The brackets in the above paragraph were submitted by the Parties as options.)



68. A Party not included in Annex I shall only benefit from project activities under Article 12 if the Party:



(a) Has ratified the Protocol3,10,12,24;



(b) Is bound by a compliance regime adopted by the COP/MOP10,24;



(c) Has not been excluded from participation in the CDM according to the procedures and mechanisms under the compliance regime10,24;



(d) Is in compliance with its commitments under Article 12 of the Convention10,24;



(e) Is in compliance with all CDM rules and guidelines and relevant provisions in the Protocol3.



69. No unilateral measures for CDM participation should preclude a developing country Party from participating in any CDM project activity11,15.



70. A Party not included in Annex I may formulate and develop projects under the CDM without a previous agreement with an entity or Party included in Annex I12.



71. Private and/or public entities can participate in the CDM with the approval of the Parties involved in CDM projects3,4,10,18,19,24, subject to:



(a) The Party in which the entity is resident being eligible to acquire or transfer CERs24;



(b) International guidelines for public and/or private entities19;



(c) Guidance provided by the executive board11;



(d) Compliance with CDM rules and guidelines3,18;



(e) Compliance with relevant provisions in the Protocol3,18;



(f) Compliance with any rules or guidance for participation in CDM project activities established by the Party in which the entity is resident4,18.



72. Parties are responsible for the involvement of their private and/or public entities in CDM project activities11,18. Participation of private and/or public entities in project activities does not affect the responsibility of Parties included in Annex I for the fulfilment of their commitments under the Protocol3,10,24 and the Convention3.



73. The Parties participating in the CDM project activities must be responsible at all stages and in all aspects for the project activity in which they are participating11. Any costs, risks or liabilities that have not been expressly accepted by the Party not included in Annex I before approval of the CDM project activity shall be assumed to be the responsibility of the participating developed country Party11. In cases where no Party included in Annex I or entity resident in such a Party is involved, the host country assumes total responsibility for the project12.



 

E. Share of proceeds



74. A share of the proceeds from CDM project activities shall be used to:



(a) Cover [administrative expenses of the CDM4,10] [costs pertaining to the activity of the executive board18];



(b) Assist developing country Parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change to meet the costs of adaptation4,10,11,13,18.



75. The share of proceeds is defined ...



- Option 1: as __ per cent of the number of CERs issued12,19.



- Option 2: as __ per cent of the value of the CERs issued7,18.



- Option 3: on the basis of the CERs4,10.



- Option 4: as __ per cent of the value of each CDM project20.



- Option 5: as a stipulated percentage of the differential of the costs incurred by the Party included in Annex I in reducing greenhouse gas emissions through a project activity in a Party not included in Annex I and of the projected costs that would have been incurred if the greenhouse gas emission reduction activity had taken place in the Party included in Annex I which is funding the project activity13.



76. The share of proceeds to cover administrative expenses is set to three per cent of the market value of the CERs7. The responsibility to assist developing country Parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change to meet the costs of adaptation is to be shared among all the Parties, provided that Parties included in Annex I bear a larger share7.



77. The share of proceeds [should be restricted to a limited amount4] [should be established at a relatively low level18] [should not exceed a defined level of total project cost, depending on the hazard rate from climate change to both the economy and the public18].



78. Option 1: A CDM adaptation fund should be established for the purpose, inter alia, of administering the share of proceeds devoted to meeting the costs of adaptation11.



Option 2: The share of proceeds for adaptation projects shall be channelled through an existing international institution to be determined by the COP/MOP10.



II. METHODOLOGICAL AND OPERATIONAL ISSUES



 

A. Project validation/registration



79. Project activities under the CDM shall:



(a) Cover [one or more of the gases listed in Annex A of the Protocol4] [only CO2 until the COP/MOP decides that other gases should be included18];



(b) Provide reductions in emissions[, in one or more of the sector/source categories listed in Annex A of the Protocol 7,] [and/or an enhancement of removals4,7,20] that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the project activity4;



(c) Assist the host Party "in achieving sustainable development"1,2;



(d) Be based on the best available long-term environmental option, taking into account local and national needs and priorities3;



(e) Lead to the transfer of state-of-the-art, environmentally sound technology in addition to that required under other provisions of the Convention and the Protocol3,11,13;



(f) Give priority to renewable energy3,12, energy efficiency12 and reducing emissions from the transportation sector12;



(g) Not support the use of nuclear power3.



80. Projects aimed at enhancing the anthropogenic or non-anthropogenic removals by sinks of greenhouse gases are not eligible for funding under the CDM3,24 until [the outcome of methodological work on Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4, is reached11,19] [the COP/MOP decides on the eligibility of CDM projects to enhance anthropogenic removals of greenhouse gases by sinks7,24] [methods are developed allowing for reliable process assessment18].



81. CDM project activities may be embedded in broader projects which are undertaken for reasons other than climate change15. In such cases, emission reductions from the CDM component of the broader project shall be additional and subject to certification procedures15.



82. [Validation10] [registration4] [presentation12] of a project activity is a prerequisite for the certification and issuance of CERs related to that project activity4,7,10.



83. Option 1: Project activities shall be [validated10] [registered4] [presented12] by operational entities4,10, upon request of a project participant10.



Option 2: A designated operational entity shall prepare a [validation10] [registration4] [presentation12] report [in accordance with Appendix B4] on the project activity to the executive board24. The executive board shall accept or reject the project24, based on the [recommendation2] [decision2] in the report24 and other relevant information2, and inform the participants whether the project may begin2.



84. Decisions on [validation10] [registration4] [presentation12] shall be published in a suitable manner10 and [validation10] [registration4] [presentation12] reports shall be public information2. Substantial objections by stakeholders shall be taken into account24.



85. A project activity shall be [validated10] [registered4] [presented12] only if:



(a) It is approved by each Party involved4,10,13,19,24 as indicated by a letter of endorsement18,24;



(b) All public and/or private entities involved demonstrate their eligibility to participate in the CDM10;



(c) It contributes to the sustainable development priorities of the Party not included in Annex I and is compatible with national priorities and needs13 as determined by the host Party3,4,11,13,18,24;



(d) It meets the criteria for CDM projects established by host Parties and by Parties included in Annex I involved in the project4;



(e) It provides an emissions baseline that meets the approved criteria specified in Appendix A3,4,10,18,27;



(f) It is expected to yield real, measurable and long-term benefits related to the mitigation of climate change3,4,10,18;

(g) It is expected to lower emissions from the level that would have occurred in the absence of the project activity3,4,10,18,19;



(h) Financing is secured (except in cases where assistance in terms of Article 12, paragraph 6, is being requested)22;



(i) Funding is additional to commercially-viable investment7,19 and additional to funding provided through official development assistance (ODA), the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and other financial commitments of the Parties included in Annex I13,19;



(j) It provides a monitoring plan, which meets the approved criteria specified in Appendix C, for the collection of data to track the performance of the project and, as appropriate, the baseline4,24;



(k) Confirmation is provided that adequate local capacity exists or will be developed22;



(l) It provides an agreement on the sharing among participants of the CERs that will accrue and the payment of administrative expenses and the contribution to adaptation assistance27.



86. The determination of whether a proposed project activity contributes to the sustainable development priorities of the Party not included in Annex I shall be ...



- Option 1: made solely by the Party not included in Annex I4,7,11,13,19.



- Option 2: specified by the Party not included in Annex I in its letter of endorsement24.



- Option 3: made by the Party not included in Annex I using procedures developed by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) as they become available18,27.



- Option 4: made by the Party not included in Annex I using international guidelines, indicators and/or standards developed by the Parties to meet the sustainable development objectives of the Protocol as a whole by, for example, utilizing the best available environmental technologies3.



- Option 5: made by the Party not included in Annex I and confirmed in a written statement indicating how the project activity and its results:



(a) are consistent with all relevant international agreements relating to sustainable development to which the Parties involved are a party10;



(b) assist in achieving sustainable development, taking into account its economic, environmental and social conditions according to its own priorities and needs and the need to minimize adverse environmental, social and economic effects taking into account existing guidance for sustainable development10;



(c) contribute to the ultimate objective of the Convention10.



87. The emissions baseline shall reflect the 'no project' scenario7 and shall be the basis for calculating the environmental additionality of the project10,18 and the emission reductions to be certified7. The operational entity shall assess whether the baseline of the proposed project meets the criteria in Appendix A4,10. This shall involve an assessment of the credibility of the baseline, the major risks regarding the emission reduction and potential leakage effects of the project27. Project baselines should be credible, verifiable, and, where possible, consistent and comparable3.



88. Option 1: Baselines shall be determined on a project-by-project basis7,11,19. In some cases, in accordance with Appendix A, sectoral baselines7 and standard baselines for project categories for each host Party19 may be applied.



Option 2: Baselines need to be established at national levels21,22 as per national communications21. These [need to be22] [may be21] backed up by project-by-project baselines21,22.



89. The operational entity shall assess the adequacy of the proposed monitoring plan by assessing its method, frequency and accuracy of measurement24.



90. If public funds are used, the project participants shall prove that the funding of the project activity will not result in a diversion of, or competition with, ODA and GEF funding10.



91. Option 1: A project activity [commenced after 11 December 19974] [, as well as any project activity under the AIJ pilot phase4,7,12,19, with the agreement of the participating Parties,4] shall be eligible for consideration as a CDM project activity if it meets the criteria contained in Appendices A and B4,7,10,12,18,19. Following project [validation10] [registration4] [presentation12], resultant reductions in emissions by sources [and/or enhancements of removals by sinks4,20] from 1 January 2000 onwards will be eligible for retrospective certification4,7,10,11,12.



Option 2: Activities implemented jointly under the pilot phase shall be automatically converted into CDM projects18.



92. Two or several small-scale projects of the same kind may be bundled so as to be subject to a single transaction involving a single Party included in Annex I, without losing their own project identity with respect to requirements for validation, verification and certification15. The Party included in Annex I may be acting on its own or on behalf of several small-scale investors15.



93. Operational entities involved in [validation10] [registration4] [presentation12] shall have no operational or financial links with CDM project activities3,10 and shall not be entitled to participate in the identification, development or financing of CDM projects10.



94. A Party may develop its own internal mechanisms and criteria for project approval based on its domestic circumstances4. These mechanisms and criteria shall be made publicly accessible4. A Party may define priority sectors for the formulation of CDM projects7.



 

B. Project financing



95. Developed country Parties shall fund CDM projects in developing country Parties. Developed country Parties may involve private and/or public entities in such funding11. Funding of CDM projects shall be additional to ODA, GEF and other financial commitments of the developed country Parties10,11.



96. Option 1: Participants may finance projects [unilaterally12, bilaterally27 or multilaterally27] [in any manner they wish18]. A Party not included in Annex I may formulate and develop projects under the CDM without a previous agreement with an entity or Party included in Annex I12,19.



Option 2: Projects [shall7] [may4] be financed through a portfolio approach4,7, under a sole supplier arrangement, by means of a centralized market7. This market may operate through regional entities accredited by the executive board7. CER prices shall be set using criteria of joint supply by sectors of the economy, regardless of the origin of the project7.



Option 3: Projects should be financed through a multilateral arrangement, a clearing house and a fund8. This may accommodate both public and private investment funds8. The clearing house should be the coordinating office and could serve to facilitate, inter alia, the selection and screening of projects and resource mobilization and utilization8.



97. Modalities and procedures for project eligibility shall ensure that CDM investments take place in Parties that are often marginalized by purely market-based instruments3. These should include portfolio approaches that allow investments in small-scale and geographically remote projects to be funded in a cost-effective manner3.



98. "The CDM shall assist in arranging funding of certified project activities as necessary"1.



99. Option 1: Where assistance in arranging funding of CDM project activities is necessary, a Party not included in Annex I may prepare project proposals that meet CDM eligibility criteria and apply for financial and technical support18. The basic condition for placing CDM projects on the market should be the possession of a certificate granted by the operating authority appointed by the Conference of the Parties, submitted to the CDM board18.



Option 2: The [COP16] [COP/MOP2] should establish a 'CDM Equitable Distribution Fund' to provide financial assistance to CDM project activities where necessary16. It would be funded by Parties included in Annex II at a substantial level to be decided by the COP/MOP in accordance with a formula to be determined16. CERs resulting from CDM projects made possible by this fund would be distributed to the Parties included in Annex II in proportion to their contributions16. This fund should be administered by the executive board16. Parties not included in Annex I may propose CDM projects individually or jointly16. The executive board would award grants to projects in accordance with criteria established by the COP/MOP16. Criteria could take into account geographic distribution of existing and planned CDM projects, the comparative need of regions or countries to receive assistance in achieving sustainable development, and the contribution of the proposed project to the global effort to limit and reduce greenhouse gas emissions16. Grants would not necessarily have to offset the full cost of a CDM project16.



100. Forty per cent of the available money shall be allocated to eligible African countries5.



C. Project monitoring



101. Participants shall develop a monitoring plan containing information on their procedures for accurate, systematic and periodic monitoring of the project in accordance with the criteria in Appendix C7,10. This will be assessed and accepted by the operational entity as part of the [validation10] [registration4] [presentation12] process24.



102. Participants shall ensure that the monitoring plan is properly implemented, that all relevant data are collected, recorded and stored3,4,7,18,24 [in a standardized format3,7,11,18,24], and are reported to the relevant entity for certification purposes4. The monitoring results shall be entered into an electronic national CDM database27.



103. The continuing adequacy of the monitoring plan and its implementation shall be assessed by the designated operational entity in its verification reports to the executive board24.



D. Project verification



104. Emission reductions achieved by the project in relation to the [validated10] [registered4] [presented12] baseline shall be [periodically27] verified from the monitored data and other pertinent information, in accordance with the methodology and standardized format contained in Appendix C7,11,27. Should the monitoring data be inadequate or insufficient, additional data from other sources may be used4. The verifier shall also review compliance with the modalities set up for project monitoring and reassess the basic project assumptions if this is necessary27.

105. Such verification shall be performed independently by a designated operational entity selected by the [proponents of the CDM project12] [host Party11]. It should be of recognized technical capacity to assume the responsibility involved12. The verifying entity shall report to the project participants, including the Parties involved, the executive board24 and operational entities12.



106. Verification shall be undertaken by entities with no operational or financial links with CDM project activities3,11,18. Such entities are fully accountable to the COP/MOP3,11, through the executive board3.



 

E. Certification/issuance of CERs



107. Certification of emission reductions shall be conducted at regular intervals and in accordance with Appendix C4,24. The procedure shall be as follows:



- Option 1: CERs shall be calculated as emission reductions by sources [or enhancements of removals by sinks4,20] that are additional to any that would have occurred in the absence of the project activity3,10,18,24, as indicated by the baseline24, where such reductions [or enhancements4,20] are real, measurable and long-term3,10.



- Option 2: CERs for the benefit of the Party included in Annex I shall be calculated as the difference between project emission levels and the OECD average17. CERs that are not assigned to the investor Party, calculated as the difference between the regional average (excluding Parties included in Annex II) and the OECD average, shall form part of a future options system for the Party in which the project takes place17.



108. Emission reductions from a [validated10] [registered4] [presented12] baseline10,11 resulting from a project shall be certified, after they have occurred, only if:



(a) A participant in the project applies for the certification of the emission reductions resulting from the project during a specific period of time10;



(b) The project activity has been validated and continues to meet the requirements for project validation10;



(c) All Parties involved are entitled to participate in the CDM10 and the Party financing the project is in compliance with the Protocol, in particular with Articles 2, 3, 5, 7 and 1018.



109. The certification of emission reductions and issuance of CERs shall be performed by



- Option 1: a designated operational entity4,7,10,11,19, upon request of a project participant10.



- Option 2: the executive board on the basis of a verification report, which states whether the project meets the necessary requirements and the amount of emissions reductions achieved by the project in the period since the last certification was performed, as submitted by a designated operational entity24.



- Option 3: the host Party government in accordance with its own procedure, with reporting to the executive board12.



- Option 4: the Convention body27.



110. The criteria provided in Appendix A for the preparation of baselines and calculation of emission reductions are to ensure methodological compatibility in treatment across CDM projects7 and between CDM and Article 6 projects7. Source/sink categories used in determining emission reductions from CDM projects shall be consistent with those used by Parties included in Annex I in their national inventories7.



111. The [operational entity10] [executive board24] [host Party government12] [Convention body27] shall inform the applicant of its decision in writing immediately upon completion of the certification process10. Decisions on the certification of emission reductions shall be published in a suitable manner10.



112. Once the emission reductions have been certified and the specified share of proceeds has been remitted to the executive board4,27, the [operational entity10] [executive board24] [host Party government12] [Convention body27] shall issue the appropriate number of CERs to project participants, including the Parties involved, as agreed among themselves4,12,18,27. Each CER shall have a unique serial number, from which it is possible to identify the project activity, country of origin, the year of certification and the certifying entity3,4,10,18,24. The CERs shall be deposited to the registry accounts of the recipients and shall be trackable through the registry system4,12,18.



(Note: One Party proposes that the certification process should be complemented, at the project level, by a system of guarantees against risks to ensure the continuance of mitigation effects during the specific period of certification.)



113. Certification shall be undertaken by entities with no operational or financial links with CDM project activities3,10 and [shall not have been involved in the identification, development, financing or validation of the project24] [shall not be entitled to participate in the identification, development or financing of CDM projects4,10].



F. Issues related to compliance



114. Steps to address cases of non-compliance with the provisions of the CDM should be based on guidelines to be laid down by the COP/MOP in accordance with procedures defined under Article 187. Issues arising shall be expeditiously resolved [through a general procedure applicable to the Protocol4] [through a specialized procedure4]4.



(Note: The brackets in the above paragraph were submitted by the Parties as options.)



115. In the case of a Party's non-compliance with its obligations resulting from the Protocol, and from its Article 3 in particular, CERs acquired under the CDM should be invalidated, either in full or in part, and can not be counted as the fulfilment of assumed obligations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions18.



116. A Party operating under Article 4 [may4] [may not4] acquire any CERs resulting from projects under Article 12 if another Party operating under the same Article 4 agreement, or if a regional economic integration organization to which the Party belongs and which is itself a Party to the Protocol, is found not to be in compliance with its obligations under Articles 5 and 74.



(Note: The matter in the above paragraph was raised by the Parties as an issue to be addressed, but not as a proposal.)



 

G. Adaptation assistance



117. An adaptation fund shall be established to administer the share of proceeds used to assist with adaptation costs3,11. The generation of funding for adaptation through this share of proceeds must be additional to the current and future financing by Parties included in Annex I of adaptation activities under other provisions of the Convention and the Protocol3.



118. The special vulnerabilities and character of small island developing states shall be taken into account and provided for in the development of an adaptation fund and in all adaptation capacity-building processes3.



119. Adaptation project activities and measures to be implemented under Article 12, paragraph 8, shall be guided by information from national communications and the three-stage approach, as set out in decision 11/CP.1 (FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1)10.



120. Parties not included in Annex I should identify adaptation projects for funding, and should follow a process of adaptation options identification4,11. Consideration of this aspect should be consistent with ongoing work on adaptation under the Convention11. A Party not included in Annex I that is particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change shall prepare a national adaptation programme, taking into account the distribution of actions over time and including estimates of the full cost, with its breakdown into sectors18.

121. Project activities and measures that help particularly vulnerable Parties not included in Annex I to adapt to the adverse effects of climate change shall be financially assisted by the adaptation fund only if they meet the following requirements:



(a) They shall be consistent with all relevant international agreements and internationally agreed programmes of action for sustainable development10;



(b) They shall be country-driven and in conformity with the national strategies and priorities for sustainable development of the Parties concerned10;



(c) They shall be implemented in a cost-effective manner10.



122. The amount of adaptation assistance should not exceed a specified share of the total project cost, depending on the estimated adverse effects of climate change on the economy and the public18.



H. Registries



123. A central registry shall be established with the aim of tracking the generation, transfer and retirement of AAUs, CERs and ERUs transferred under the Protocol mechanisms3.



I. Reporting by Parties



124. Parties included in Annex I participating in CDM projects shall report on their CDM activities:



(a) Annually within the framework of their reporting commitments under Article 7, paragraph 110,18,24, specifying, in a standard format, inter alia:



(i) New CERs issued to the Party as a result of CDM project activities during that year (identified by serial number)2;



(ii) Any CERs (identified by serial number) that have been retired that year2;



(b) Within the framework of their reporting commitments under Article 7, paragraph 210,18,24, specifying, inter alia, how the Party's CDM projects have assisted Parties not included in Annex I in achieving sustainable development and in contributing to the ultimate objective of the Convention10.



125. Parties not included in Annex I shall report on their activities under Article 12 in the context of their reporting commitments under Article 12 of the Convention, according to guidelines to be established by the [COP/MOP24] [COP2]24. This reporting shall include how they have assisted Parties included in Annex I in achieving compliance with their commitments under Article 310.



 

III. INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES



 

A. Role of the COP/MOP



126. "The CDM shall be subject to the authority and guidance of the COP/MOP"1,4,7,10,11.



127. In relation to methodological and operational issues, the COP/MOP shall, inter alia:



(a) Determine the "part of the quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under Article 3"1 which Parties included in Annex I can meet through CERs10,24;



(b) Elaborate, review and approve methodologies for determining baselines4; monitoring4, verification4,10, certification4,10 and reporting4,10 and issue technical guidelines for their practical application24;



(c) "Ensure that a share of the proceeds from certified project activities is used to cover administrative expenses as well as to assist developing country Parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change to meet the costs of adaptation"1,4,10 and determine that share24;



(d) Determine eligibility criteria for adaptation under Article 12, paragraph 8, designate the entity entrusted with the operation of the financial mechanism of the Convention and adopt modalities, procedures and technical guidelines24.



128. In relation to institutional issues, the COP/MOP shall, inter alia:



(a) Define the terms of reference for4,10,24, and establish18,24, the executive board;



(b) Determine the modalities and procedures governing the operation of the CDM4,24;



(c) Designate operational entities10,18,24, or establish guidelines as a basis for delegating this function24, and decide which functions they will carry out10,18;



(d) Disqualify, upon recommendation of the executive board, operational entities from certifying emission reductions if the executive board concludes that the requirements for the certification of the emission reductions have not been fulfilled10;



(e) Determine the basis for private and public sector participation in CDM projects18;



(f) Establish rules and procedures for the preparation and distribution of the provisional agenda of executive board meetings and for presentations to be made to the executive board by Parties and accredited observers20;



(g) Establish a body to be responsible for sanctions and penalties for non-compliance in the framework of the Protocol and its mechanisms18;



(h) Determine the nature and extent of the supervisory role of the executive board over the CDM and the implications of the subordination of the executive board to the COP/MOP20.



129. In instances of a dispute arising between Parties, transfers and acquisitions of CERs may continue to be made after the issue has arisen, provided that any such CERs may not be used by a Party to meet its commitments under Article 3 until the issue is resolved7. Arbitration for disputes between Parties shall be undertaken in accordance with Article 14 of the Convention7.



 

B. Executive board



130. The executive board shall supervise3,4,7,11,18,19 and be responsible for3 [the CDM11] [the daily management of the CDM3,4,18] as a [separate standing body of the COP/MOP4] [independent body3,18]. The executive board shall be fully accountable to the COP/MOP3,4,11 and shall carry out all instructions and all other functions assigned to it by the COP/MOP10.



131. In relation to methodological and operational issues, the executive board shall, inter alia:



(a) Define the areas from which projects can be included in the CDM and define the types of projects that can be included12;



(b) Supervise CDM project activities to ensure that these are in conformity with the Convention, the Protocol and all relevant decisions by the COP/MOP10;



(c) Determine the criteria that the Parties must use for establishing baselines12;



(d) Ensure that information on baselines used for project evaluation, including standardized baselines, is publicly accessible4;



(e) In so far as authorized by the COP/MOP, provide guidance for public and/or private entity participants10;



(f) Review reports submitted by operational entities and provide synthesis reports to the COP/MOP4,19;



(g) Issue CERs on the basis of verification reports submitted by designated operational entities24;



(h) Publish, in a timely manner, information on transfers of CERs, including, inter alia, dates, project type, project start date, participating Parties and organizations, and quantity and prices of CERs transferred7.



(i) On the basis of a centralized trading mechanism, play a fiduciary role which will:



(i) Guarantee a favourable commercial position to negotiate a fair price for the Parties involved7;



(ii) Ensure the transparency and credibility of the trading process7;



(iii) Reduce transaction costs7;



(iv) Lower the environmental risk by means of a portfolio approach guaranteeing the effectiveness and credibility of the mechanism7;



(j) Determine the methodology used for the transfer of CERs12;



(k) Determine the percentage of CERs that will be part of the adaptation fund and the manner in which the CERs will be transformed into financial resources12;



(l) Assist in arranging funding of CDM project activities as necessary, including acting as a project clearing-house and publishing summary information on proposed CDM projects in need of funding24;



(m) Assign, as necessary, functions to other institutions under Article 12 within the framework provided for by the COP/MOP10;



(n) Define the roles of the multilateral agencies with experience in climate change, especially as regards development of the institutional capability required to promote broad participation by all Parties not included in Annex I7.



(o) Call on experts for technical advice if deemed necessary4;



(p) Hold its meetings open to all Parties and accredited observers20;



(q) Record and communicate the full text of its decisions, in all six official languages of the United Nations, to Parties and persons and entities that the COP/MOP believes should receive them20.



132. In relation to institutional issues, the executive board shall, inter alia:



(a) [Accredit operational entities based on guidance from the COP/MOP4] [coordinate the designation by Parties of the national operational entities, which will be in charge of the functions of the CDM in each Party12];



(b) Provide guidance for the involvement of private and/or public entities in CDM project activities11;



(c) Review and audit operational entities[, through carrying out sample checks10,] and revoke, in accordance with a process to be determined by the COP/MOP, the accreditation of operational entities which fail to comply with modalities and procedures determined by the COP/MOP4,10;



(d) Maintain a publicly available list of operational entities4;



(e) Report on its operations to each session of the COP/MOP10;



(f) Administer the 'CDM Equitable Distribution Fund'16.



133. The executive board shall, in accordance with Article 12, paragraph 8, receive a share of proceeds from certified project activities to cover its administrative expenses4. [The secretariat shall, within its functions outlined in Article 8 of the Convention, support the executive board as necessary10, under the guidance of the COP/MOP4] [The executive board should be supported by a dedicated secretariat, comprising of technical and administrative staff22. The Convention secretariat should be extended to accommodate this22.]



134. The executive board shall consist of [x] members4,10 elected by the COP/MOP7,20 and shall comprise



- Option 1: an equal number of representatives from Parties included and not included in Annex I4,7,17, elected by Parties included and not included in Annex I respectively4.



- Option 2: a fair and geographically equitable membership3,11 and be functionally small11.



- Option 3: two representatives from Asia, two representatives from the Americas, two representatives from Europe, two representatives from Africa and one representative from the island States, making up a total of nine members7. Members shall be proposed by the Parties7.



- Option 4: an equal number of persons, but not less than two, nominated by each of the five United Nations regional groups20. A vacancy should be filled by the COP/MOP electing a successor who is nominated by the regional group that had nominated the person holding the position that became vacant20.



135. Members of the executive board should be appointed for a period of up to two years7. Members should possess appropriate technical expertise3. The COP/MOP shall select a Chairman and a Vice-Chairman of the executive board from among its members, with one of those officers being from a Party not included in Annex I20.



136. All decisions of the CDM executive board must be taken only by consensus20. There should be a prohibition against the executive board taking a decision unless at least one member of the executive board from each of the five United Nations regional groups is present in person20. The executive board should not be allowed to delegate any decisions for which it is responsible20.



137. The executive board should be located in the secretariat of the Convention7.

 

 

C. Operational entities



138. Operational entities shall:



(a) ["Be designated by the COP/MOP"1,11] [be designated by the COP/MOP or by a national or regional authority to which this function was delegated by the COP/MOP24] [be accredited by the executive board based on selection criteria4];



(b) Be supervised by the executive board3,10,11 and fully accountable to the COP/MOP, through the executive board3;



(c) Be subject to modalities and procedures specified in applicable decisions of the COP/MOP4;



(d) Have no operational or financial links with CDM project activities3,10,11,18 and [shall not have been involved in the identification, development, financing or validation of the project11,24] [shall not be entitled to participate in the identification, development or financing of CDM projects4,10].



139. Option 1: Entities shall be designated as operational entities only if they:



(a) Provide for the necessary expertise and the necessary means to validate project activities, to certify emission reductions and to carry out sample checks if so mandated10;



(b) Work in a credible, independent, non-discriminatory and transparent manner and ensure, where appropriate, that the certification is based on internationally agreed standards10;



Option 2: The Parties must designate their national operating entities, and inform the secretariat of the Convention and the executive board12. The procedure to appoint the national operating entities will be the attribute of each Party, which can create a new entity or choose an existing entity for this role12.



140. The functions of an operational entity shall be to:



(a) [Validate10] [register4] [present12] project activities under Article 124,10, on request of a project participant10, to ensure that it meets the standards agreed by the COP/MOP24;



(b) Option 1: Verify emission reductions achieved by projects and propose their certification by means of a verification report to the executive board24;



Option 2: Certify emission reductions by sources [and/or enhancements of removals by sinks4] which have resulted from CDM project activities4,11 and issue CERs4;



(c) Transfer a share of proceeds to [...] to cover administrative expenses and to [...] to assist developing country Parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change to meet the costs of adaptation4;



(d) Publish their decisions on the validation of project activities in a suitable manner10;



(e) Submit annual activity reports to the executive board in accordance with the modalities and procedures for reporting4.



 

D. Parties



141. Each Party participating in the CDM project shall establish a national system for the monitoring, verification and reporting under the CDM, which may include establishing an institution for coordinating and managing the governmental approving authority, steering committee, and expert body for settling of substantial matters18.



142. A national CDM authority shall:



(a) Determine independent criteria for project eligibility on the basis of national priorities/strategies for sustainable development7;



(b) Evaluate projects using national criteria and international standards7;



(c) Approve projects and formalize the official recognition of the designated national authority7;



(d) Promote broad participation by public, private and non-governmental organizations7;



(e) Coordinate international fora, including operational activities in verification and certification, with the executive board and the accredited entities7;



(f) Register individuals and organizations involved in the trading of CERs7;



(g) Register and account for national emission reductions reported to the executive board and traded by the executive board through its accredited entities7;



(h) Reconcile the national account and report it annually to the executive board7;



(i) Ensure fair distribution of the economic benefits among project participants7.



E. Administrative support



143. The secretariat [within its functions outlined in Article 8 of the Convention10] [on request by the executive board4] shall [support the executive board as necessary10] [provide administrative and secretariat assistance to the executive board4,24]. This assistance could include compiling, synthesizing and disseminating information related to CDM activities, including in relation to Article 12, paragraph 6, and performing other secretariat functions as requested by the executive board4.



144. The secretariat shall keep a record of executive board decisions and communicate the full text of all decisions to each Party and to the categories of persons and entities that the COP/MOP believes should receive them20. Provision should be made for decisions to be translated and communicated to Parties in all six official languages of the United Nations20.



145. A share of proceeds according to Article 12, paragraph 8, shall be used to cover all administrative expenses of the CDM, including the administration of the executive board and administration of the share of proceeds for adaptation10.



 

F. Review



146. The COP/MOP shall:



(a) Periodically review the operations of the executive board, operational entities and entities for independent verification4,18;



(b) Review Article 12 modalities, procedures and technical guidelines five years after their adoption and periodically thereafter10. Any revision of these modalities and procedures will not have an impact on emission reductions already certified10;



(c) Periodically review the implementation of CDM project activities and their geographical spread, and take appropriate action to promote the principle of equity11;



(d) Option 1: Review the allocation of the share of proceeds for adaptation projects five years after the adoption of these modalities and procedures10;



Option 2: Periodically review the needs of developing country Parties particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change for adaptation assistance under Article 12, paragraph 83;



(e) Periodically review the capacity-building needs of developed country Parties to access the CDM3.



Appendices to Part Three



APPENDIX A:

Baselines10

 



APPENDIX B:

 

Validation/registration4



APPENDIX C:

Monitoring10, reporting4, verification4 and

certification/issuance of CERs4



APPENDIX D:

Registries2



APPENDIX E:

Procedures for the operation of the executive board4



APPENDIX F:

Guidelines for operational entities4



APPENDIX G:

Disbursement of the share of proceeds4



APPENDIX H:

Adaptation10



 

PART FOUR



EMISSIONS TRADING



 

I. NATURE AND SCOPE



 

A. Purpose



147. "The Parties included in Annex B may participate in emissions trading for the purposes of fulfilling their commitments under Article 3. Any such trading shall be supplemental to domestic actions for the purpose of meeting quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under that Article."1,11



148. "... any part of an assigned amount, which a Party acquires from another Party in accordance with the provisions of ... Article 17 shall be added to the assigned amount for the acquiring Party."1 "... any part of an assigned amount, which a Party transfers to another Party in accordance with the provisions of ... Article 17 shall be subtracted from the assigned amount of the transferring Party."1



 

B. Principles



149. In their actions to achieve the purpose of emissions trading, the Parties shall be guided, inter alia, by the following:



(a) Article 3 of the Convention11;



(b) Equity3,11,13,19 between developed and developing country Parties13, including equity with respect to per capita greenhouse gas emissions13, so as to not perpetuate existing inequities between Parties included in Annex I and developing country Parties11,13;



(c) Climate change effectiveness10,11,13,19 (i.e. real, measurable and long-term benefits related to mitigation of climate change are to be achieved10,11,13; overall emissions reductions should not be lower than would otherwise be the case10); resources gained from the sale of surplus assigned amounts must [should] be invested in measures that reduce emissions further18;



(d) Cost-effectiveness (i.e. global benefits are to be achieved at the lowest cost)4,10,19;



(e) Recognizing that the Protocol has not created or bestowed any right, title or entitlement11;



(f) Ensuring that the Protocol has not created any asset, commodity or goods for exchange13;



(g) Transparency2,19;



(h) Prevention of distortion of competition2.



(i) Option 1: The concept of 'fungibility' among the three mechanisms of the Protocol is totally unacceptable6.



Option 2: [Acquired AAUs, ERUs and CERs can be used to fulfil a Party's own obligations or be the object of further trade18] [There is no restriction on the transfer of excess AAUs, ERUs and CERs24] [ERUs and CERs may be traded. However, the use of CERs in emissions trading needs to be further discussed through the rule-making process for the CDM19].



 

C. Supplementarity



Limits on acquisitions



150. Option 1: Acquisitions of assigned amount shall be supplemental to domestic actions for the purpose of meeting a Party's quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under Article 314,21,22.



Option 2: Access to Article 17 by a Party included in Annex I should be contingent on satisfaction of prescribed domestic effort in fulfilment of commitments under Article 33,6,11,13.



Option 3: Net acquisitions by a Party included in Annex I for all three mechanisms together must not exceed the higher of the following alternatives:



(a) 5 per cent of: its base year emissions multiplied by 5 plus its assigned amount

2



(where 'base year emissions' may be replaced by 'average annual emissions in the base period, as provided for in Article 3, paragraph 5')10;



(b) 50 per cent of: the difference between its annual actual emissions in any year of the period from 1994 to 2002, multiplied by 5, and its assigned amount10.



However, the ceiling on net acquisitions can be increased to the extent that a Party included in Annex I achieves emission reductions larger than the relevant ceiling in the commitment period through domestic action undertaken after 1993, if demonstrated by the Party in a verifiable manner and subject to the expert review process to be developed under Article 810.



Option 4: The overall 'cap' on the use of the three mechanisms should not exceed 25-30 per cent as a maximum20.



Option 5: No determination of the term "supplemental"4.



Option 6: It is necessary to set limits on the use of mechanisms to meet emission targets in the first commitment period. However, if objective criteria to prevent hot air are established, it might be reasonable to remove limits in the second and third commitment periods19.



Limits on transfers



151. Option 1: Access to Article 17 by a Party included in Annex I should be contingent on satisfaction of prescribed domestic effort in fulfilment of commitments under Article 33,11,13.



Option 2: Net transfers by a Party included in Annex I for all three mechanisms together must not exceed:



5 per cent of: its base year emissions multiplied by 5 plus its assigned amount

2



(where 'base year emissions' may be replaced by 'average annual emissions in the base period, as provided for in Article 3, paragraph 5')10.



However, the ceiling on net transfers can be increased to the extent that a Party included in Annex I achieves emission reductions larger than the relevant ceiling in the commitment period through domestic action undertaken after 1993, if demonstrated by the Party in a verifiable manner and subject to the expert review process to be developed under Article 810.



Option 3: The overall 'cap' on the use of the three mechanisms should not exceed 25-30 per cent as a maximum20.



Option 4: No determination of the term "supplemental"4.



Option 5: It is necessary to set limits on the use of mechanisms to meet emission targets in the first commitment period. However, if objective criteria to prevent hot air are established, it might be reasonable to remove limits in the second and third commitment periods19.



Option 6: There are no limits on the transfer of emission surpluses achieved during the period between the time the Protocol enters into force and the first commitment period18.



 

D. Participation



152. Option 1: A Party included in Annex I shall be eligible to transfer or acquire AAUs under the provisions of Article 17, if the Party:



(a) Has ratified the Protocol10,24;

(b) Is bound by a compliance regime adopted by the COP/MOP10;



(c) Has not been excluded from participation in emissions trading according to the procedures and mechanisms under the compliance regime mentioned in (b) above10,11,13,24;



(d) Has had its national inventory certified by an accredited independent entity according to international standards agreed by the COP [COP/MOP] (depending on the rules agreed for in-depth review under Article 8 and the standards for national inventory systems under Article 5, this may not be necessary)24;



(e) Maintains a national registry that complies with the provisions of Appendix C11,19;



(f) Is in compliance with the provisions of Articles [311,13] 5 and 7 of the Protocol [and Article 12 of the Convention]10,11,13,19,24.



Option 2: A Party may not participate in emissions trading under Article 17 if it is found:



(a) Not to be in compliance with its obligations under Articles 5 and 74;



(b) Not to be maintaining a national registry, in accordance with Appendix C4.



153. If a Party's consistency with the above requirements is called into question [by the review process under Article 84] [by other means4], the issue will be expeditiously resolved [through a general procedure applicable to the Protocol4] [through a specialized procedure4]4.



(Note: The brackets in the above paragraph were submitted by the Parties as options.)



154. Changes in a Party's eligibility to trade or changes pertaining to new entrants that meet the eligibility criteria may occur during the current commitment period10.



155. Option 1: A Party included in Annex I may authorize legal entities to participate in emissions trading under its responsibility if the Party:



(a) Is eligible to participate in emissions trading10;



(b) Has established and maintains a national system for accurate monitoring, verification, accountability and allocation of AAUs to legal entities10,18,24 and for controlling the effects of trade on the Party's assigned amount18. Guidelines on the establishment, maintenance and international compatibility of these national systems are included in Appendix A10,24;



Legal entities authorized by a Party to participate in emissions trading under Article 17 may transfer and acquire excess AAUs under the same principles, modalities, rules and guidelines as the Parties24.



Option 2: A Party may authorize its legal entities to transfer and acquire AAUs and shall ensure that such participation is consistent with [the principles, modalities, rules and guidelines applying to Parties4] [international guidelines for legal entities19].



156. A Party that authorizes its legal entities to transfer or acquire AAUs shall remain responsible for fulfilment of its obligations under the Protocol4,10,19,24.



E. Share of proceeds



157. A specified percentage of the [AAUs transferred][value of each emissions trading transaction] will be contributed to help meet administrative expenses and the adaptation needs of [the most vulnerable] developing country Parties3,5,7,8,17,21,25,26. The share of proceeds to assist in meeting adaptation costs shall be the same as for the provisions in paragraph 8 of Article 127.



 

II. METHODOLOGICAL AND OPERATIONAL ISSUES



 

A. Modalities of operation



158. Option 1: Transfers and acquisitions of AAUs could be effected through bilateral or multilateral arrangements between the Parties involved6 [without creating a new international business transaction system or regime6].



Option 2: Transfers and acquisitions of AAUs between Parties may take place through an exchange10. This exchange shall also be open to legal entities10.



159. Option 1: Units surplus to plan: Emissions trading under Article 17 shall operate under an annual post-verification trading system limited to AAUs determined to be surplus to a Party's allocation plan24. Each Party that wishes to undertake transfers under Article 17 shall allocate its total assigned amount among the five years of the commitment period and notify the secretariat of these annual allocations prior to the start of the commitment period24. A Party can at any time adjust its annual allocation for the remaining years of the commitment period by notifying the secretariat in advance of the year(s) in question24. The assigned amount allocation to any single year should not exceed plus or minus 20 per cent of the total assigned amount divided by five24.



Excess AAUs for a given year shall be calculated as follows24:



(a) Cumulative assigned amount allocation from the beginning of the commitment period through the given year minus cumulative emissions from the beginning of the commitment period through the given year24;



(b) In addition, the amount of excess AAU certificates issued for previous years of the commitment period and cumulative ERUs transferred under Article 6 must be subtracted to obtain the annual excess AAUs.24 Holdings of ERUs and CERs shall not be included in the calculation.24



The secretariat shall verify the availability of excess AAUs and issue certificates for them24. All issued certificates shall be valid on the market without any liability or trade-specific compliance rules24.



Option 2: Compliance reserve: A portion [x per cent] of every transfer of AAUs under Article 17 shall be placed in a compliance reserve10. These AAUs may not be used or traded10. The secretariat, as part of the annual compilation and accounting of emissions inventories and assigned amounts under Article 8, shall include information on the AAUs deposited in the compliance reserve10. At the end of the commitment period, such AAUs shall be returned to the Party of origin if that Party is in compliance with its commitments under Article 3, in which case the AAUs can be transferred or banked for future commitment periods10. If, at the end of the commitment period, a Party is not in compliance with its commitments under Article 3, an appropriate number of units deposited in the reserve account shall be invalidated, in which case they may not be further used or traded10.



Option 3: Surplus units: Only excess reductions may be transferred and acquired under Article 1713. The assigned amount is the emission reduction commitment of a developed country Party13. If a developed country Party is able to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions over and above its reduction commitment, such excess reduction may be transferred to any other Party13.



160. Any Party wishing to transfer or acquire AAUs must publish the amount to be transferred prior to the transfer10.



161. Arrangements made among subsets of Parties, including within regional economic integration organizations, should be subject to the oversight of, and be accountable to, the COP/MOP3.



 

B. Verification



162. Each Party included in Annex I participating, or authorizing any legal entity to participate, in emissions trading must:



(a) Establish a national system for managing and monitoring emissions trading. Internal verification must be carried out before reports are submitted to the COP/MOP18;



(b) Arrange for certification of the national inventory by an accredited independent entity according to international standards agreed by the COP [COP/MOP2]24.



(c) Maintain compliance with its obligations under Article 5 and 74;



(d) Maintain a national registry in accordance with the provisions of Appendix C4.



163. A Party's consistency with the emissions trading related requirements should be reviewable, initially by the Article 8 expert review process and subsequently, if appropriate, by a suitable procedure under the Protocol's compliance regime4.



164. The secretariat verifies the availability of excess AAUs and issues certificates for them, denominated in units of one ton of CO2 and with unique serial numbers that include the Party of origin and the commitment period for which the units are issued24. All issued certificates are valid on the market without any liability or trade-specific compliance rules24.



C. Issues related to compliance



165. Option 1: Buyer liability: If a Party included in Annex I is in non-compliance with its commitments, that part of the assigned amount that has been 'transferred' in accordance with Article 17 shall be invalidated11.



166. Option 2: Shared liability: If a Party is found to be in non-compliance with its commitments under Article 3, a portion [x per cent] of any of its AAUs that have been transferred to other Parties under the provisions of Article 17, shall be invalidated and cannot be used for the purpose of meeting commitments under Article 3 or further traded10,18. [The portion [x per cent] to be invalidated shall be some multiple of the degree of non-compliance10. The degree of non-compliance is the percentage difference between emissions in the commitment period and the assigned amount10.]



Option 3: Seller liability: A Party whose actual emissions for the commitment period exceed its assigned amount (adjusted for transfers and acquisitions of AAUs, ERUs and CERs) after the compliance deadline will be subject to the provisions of the compliance regime adopted by the COP/MOP2.



(Note: Option 3 is frequently mentioned in discussions on this subject and is therefore included here for purposes of completeness only.)



Option 4: 'Trigger': If a question is raised concerning a Party's compliance with its commitments under Article 3 and the Party is subsequently found to be in non-compliance, any AAUs that have been transferred to other Parties under the provisions of Article 17 after the point in time at which the question was raised shall be invalidated and cannot be used for the purpose of meeting commitments under Article 3, or further traded10. Such questions can only be raised in particular circumstances to be defined10.



167. A Party or legal entity that exceeds its assigned amount at the end of the commitment period may not transfer AAUs to another Party, but may acquire AAUs from another Party19. At the end of each commitment period, there shall be a [short time period4] during which Parties have the opportunity to cure any emissions overage (e.g. through acquiring AAUs)4,19.



168. A Party operating under Article 4 [may4] [may not4] acquire any ERUs resulting from projects under Article 6 if another Party operating under the same Article 4 agreement, or if a regional economic integration organization to which the Party belongs and which is itself a Party to the Protocol, is found not to be in compliance with its obligations under Articles 5 and 74.



(Note: The matter in the above paragraph was raised by the Parties as an issue to be addressed, but not as a proposal.)



169. If a question of implementation by a Party included in Annex I of the requirements referred to in the principles, modalities, rules and guidelines relating to Article 17 is identified in accordance with the relevant provisions of Article 8 [or by means of another process4], transfers and acquisitions of AAUs may continue to be made after the question has been identified, provided that they may not be used by a Party to meet its commitments under Article 3 until any issue of compliance has been resolved in favour of the Party in question10. Such a question shall be expeditiously resolved [through a general procedure applicable to the Protocol4] [through a specialized procedure4]4.



(Note: The brackets in the above paragraph were submitted by the Parties as options.)



(Note: A group of Parties, in their joint submission, raised the question of the need to address the issue of whether a Party whose emissions exceed its assigned amount for the previous commitment period should retain its eligibility to participate in emissions trading under Article 17 in the subsequent commitment period.)



 

D. Registries



170. Option 1: Any Party participating in [or authorizing any legal entity to participate in10,24] emissions trading shall establish and maintain a national registry4,10,11,18,24 which accurately records all holdings, transfers, acquisitions [and retirements4,24] of [excess24] AAUs by the Party and its authorized legal entities4,10,24.



Option 2: A central registry shall be established with the aim of tracking the generation, transfer and retirement of AAUs, CERs and ERUs transferred under the Protocol mechanisms3.



171. Upon verifying the availability of excess AAUs and the issuance of certificates for them by the secretariat, excess AAUs shall be subtracted from the assigned amount of the relevant Party24. The secretariat shall undertake this transaction by transferring the serial numbers for the certified excess AAUs to the Party's registry24. In turn, an equal number of AAUs shall be retired from the Party's assigned amount24.



172. Transfers and acquisitions of AAUs shall be made by removing AAUs (identified by serial number) from the registry of the transferring Party and adding them to the registry of the acquiring Party4.



173. AAUs used by a Party toward meeting its commitment under Article 3, paragraph 1, shall be retired by that Party, in which case such units may not be further used or transferred4. A record of all retired AAUs (identified by serial number) shall be kept by the Party in its registry4.



174. Information maintained in a national registry shall be publicly accessible4,10,19 through the internet19. Guidelines on the establishment, maintenance and international compatibility of national registries are included in Appendix C10,19,24 and include a standard electronic database system19.



175. Any two or more Parties may voluntarily maintain their registries in a consolidated system, within which each registry would remain legally distinct4.



 

E. Reporting by Parties



176. Each Party participating in, or authorizing any legal entity to participate in, emissions trading shall include in its annual submission to the secretariat under Article 7, paragraph 110,11,24, inter alia, information, in a standard electronic format4, on:



(a) Transfers and acquisitions of AAUs during that year, including, for each unit, the serial number and the Party's registry to which it was transferred or from which it was acquired4,10,11,18;



(b) Any AAUs (identified by serial number) that have been retired that year4,18.



177. As part of the annual compilation and accounting of emissions inventories and assigned amounts under Article 8, the secretariat shall present a publicly available synthesis of the reports by Parties on transfers and acquisitions of AAUs during such year, including which AAUs have been used by a Party for purposes of compliance with Article 3, paragraph 14,10,19. It shall provide Parties with the opportunity to investigate and correct any discrepancies in the recording of transfers of assigned amounts4. The synthesis shall reflect any remaining discrepancies4.



 

III. INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES



A. Role of the COP and/or the COP/MOP



178. Emissions trading is subject to the authority and guidance of the [COP] COP/MOP3.



179. The [COP] [COP/MOP] shall:



(a) Define the roles of verification and auditing entities, including private sector entities3;



(b) Issue guidelines on national allocation and accountability procedures for legal entities24;



(c) Issue guidelines on the establishment of national registries24;



(d) Determine the share of proceeds, if any, to be imposed on transfers of AAUs to meet administrative expenses and to help meet the adaptation needs of the most vulnerable developing country Parties2;



(e) Track the potential for distortion of competition and include standard checks in the guidelines22.



180. Any smaller bodies authorized to carry out executive functions on behalf of the [COP] [COP/MOP] must have a membership that reflects the unique representational balance established by the practice of the Parties (such as the COP Bureau)3.



 

B. Parties



181. A Party participating in Article 17 shall:



(a) Establish and maintain a national system for accurate monitoring, verification, accountability and allocation of AAUs to legal entities10,18,24 and for controlling the effects of trade on the Party's assigned amount18;



(b) Establish and maintain a national registry containing records of holdings, transfers, acquisitions, [transfer prices19] and retirements of AAUs by the Party itself and legal entities resident in the Party in accordance with the guidelines in Appendix C4,10,11,18,19,24, through the standard electronic database system accepted by the COP/MOP19;



(c) Maintain an up-to-date list of legal entities resident in that Party authorized to participate in emissions trading under Article 17 and make it available to the secretariat and the public10,19;

(d) Report annually on activities under Article 17 [to the secretariat19] in accordance with guidelines adopted by the [COP] [COP/MOP]4,10,11,18,24;



(e) Ensure that resident legal entities authorized to participate in emissions trading under Article 17 comply with applicable rules and procedures2.



 

C. Administrative support



182. The secretariat established by Article 8 of the Convention shall serve as the secretariat for administration of emissions trading under Article 172.



183. The secretariat shall make information on the Parties that are eligible to participate in international trade publicly available10.



 

D. Review



184. The COP [COP/MOP] shall review the principles, modalities, rules and guidelines governing the operation of the emissions trading system10. The first review shall be carried out no later than the year 201210. Further reviews shall be carried out periodically thereafter10.



185. Changes in principles, modalities, rules and guidelines shall take effect in commitment periods subsequent to that of their adoption10. Changes in a Party's eligibility to trade or changes pertaining to new entrants that meet the eligibility criteria may occur during the current commitment period10.



Appendices to Part Four



APPENDIX A:

 

National systems10



APPENDIX B:



Reporting2



APPENDIX C:

 

Registries2

Annex I



ARTICLE 6 OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL



1. For the purpose of meeting its commitments under Article 3, any Party included in Annex I may transfer to, or acquire from, any other such Party emission reduction units resulting from projects aimed at reducing anthropogenic emissions by sources or enhancing anthropogenic removals by sinks of greenhouse gases in any sector of the economy, provided that:

 

(a) Any such project has the approval of the Parties involved;



(b) Any such project provides a reduction in emissions by sources, or an enhancement of removals by sinks, that is additional to any that would otherwise occur;



(c) It does not acquire any emission reduction units if it is not in compliance with its obligations under Articles 5 and 7; and



(d) The acquisition of emission reduction units shall be supplemental to domestic actions for the purposes of meeting commitments under Article 3.



2. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol may, at its first session or as soon as practicable thereafter, further elaborate guidelines for the implementation of this Article, including for verification and reporting.



3. A Party included in Annex I may authorize legal entities to participate, under its responsibility, in actions leading to the generation, transfer or acquisition under this Article of emission reduction units.



4. If a question of implementation by a Party included in Annex I of the requirements referred to in this Article is identified in accordance with the relevant provisions of

Article 8, transfers and acquisitions of emission reduction units may continue to be made after the question has been identified, provided that any such units may not be used by a Party to meet its commitments under Article 3 until any issue of compliance is resolved.



Annex II



ARTICLE 12 OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL



1. A clean development mechanism is hereby defined.



2. The purpose of the clean development mechanism shall be to assist Parties not included in Annex I in achieving sustainable development and in contributing to the ultimate objective of the Convention, and to assist Parties included in Annex I in achieving compliance with their quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under Article 3.



3. Under the clean development mechanism:



(a) Parties not included in Annex I will benefit from project activities resulting in certified emission reductions; and



(b) Parties included in Annex I may use the certified emission reductions accruing from such project activities to contribute to compliance with part of their quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under Article 3, as determined by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol.



4. The clean development mechanism shall be subject to the authority and guidance of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol and be supervised by an executive board of the clean development mechanism.



5. Emission reductions resulting from each project activity shall be certified by operational entities to be designated by the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol, on the basis of:



(a) Voluntary participation approved by each Party involved;



(b) Real, measurable, and long-term benefits related to the mitigation of climate change; and



(c) Reductions in emissions that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the certified project activity.



6. The clean development mechanism shall assist in arranging funding of certified project activities as necessary.



7. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol shall, at its first session, elaborate modalities and procedures with the objective of ensuring transparency, efficiency and accountability through independent auditing and verification of project activities.



8. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to this Protocol shall ensure that a share of the proceeds from certified project activities is used to cover administrative expenses as well as to assist developing country Parties that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change to meet the costs of adaptation.



9. Participation under the clean development mechanism, including in activities mentioned in paragraph 3(a) above and in the acquisition of certified emission reductions, may involve private and/or public entities, and is to be subject to whatever guidance may be provided by the executive board of the clean development mechanism.



10. Certified emission reductions obtained during the period from the year 2000 up to the beginning of the first commitment period can be used to assist in achieving compliance in the first commitment period.



Annex III



ARTICLE 17 OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL



The Conference of the Parties shall define the relevant principles, modalities, rules and guidelines, in particular for verification, reporting and accountability for emissions trading. The Parties included in Annex B may participate in emissions trading for the purposes of fulfilling their commitments under Article 3. Any such trading shall be supplemental to domestic actions for the purpose of meeting quantified emission limitation and reduction commitments under that Article.



Annex IV



CODE OF SOURCES



1 Text from the Kyoto Protocol

2 Proposals from the Chairmen

3 Alliance of Small Island States

4 Australia, Canada, Iceland, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, the Russian Federation, Ukraine and the United States of America

5 Burkina Faso

6 China

7 Costa Rica

8 The Gambia

9 Georgia

10 Germany, on behalf of the European Community and its member States and Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania and Slovenia; and Germany, on behalf of the European Community, its member States and Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, the Slovak Republic and Slovenia;

11 Group of 77 and China

12 Guatemala

13 India

14 Mauritius

15 Mexico

16 Nigeria

17 Peru

18 Poland

19 Republic of Korea

20 Saudi Arabia

21 Sierra Leone

22 South Africa

23 Sudan

24 Switzerland

25 Togo

26 Uganda

27 Uzbekistan



- - - - -