Distr.
GENERAL
FCCC/AGBM/1995/7
21 November 1995
Original: ENGLISH
AD HOC GROUP ON THE BERLIN MANDATESecond session
Geneva, 30 October - 3 November 1995
ON THE WORK OF ITS SECOND SESSION, HELD AT GENEVA
Paragraphs Page
I. OPENING OF THE SESSION 1-3 3
II. ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS
(Agenda item 1) 4-13 3
A. Adoption of the agenda 4 3
B. Organization of work of the session 5 4
C. Organization of the work of future sessions 6-10 4
D. Attendance 11-12 6
E. Documentation 13 6
GE.95-
Paragraphs Page
III. ELECTION OF OFFICERS OTHER THAN
THE CHAIRMAN
(Agenda item 2) 14-16 6
IV. STRENGTHENING THE COMMITMENTS IN
ARTICLE 4.2(A) and (B)
(Agenda item 3) 17-39 7
V. CONTINUING TO ADVANCE THE IMPLEMENTATION
OF ARTICLE 4.1
(Agenda item 4) 40-46 10
VI. POSSIBLE FEATURES OF A PROTOCOL OR
ANOTHER LEGAL INSTRUMENT
(Agenda item 5) 47-53 11
VII. REPORT ON THE SESSION
(Agenda item 6) 54-57 12
I. Lists of attendance 13
II. Documents prepared for the Ad Hoc Group on the
Berlin Mandate at its second session 16
1. The second session of the Ad Hoc Group on the Berlin Mandate
(hereinafter referred to as "the AGBM") was held at Geneva from 30
October to 3 November 1995. The session was convened in accordance
with the schedule confirmed at the first session (FCCC/AGBM/1995/2,
para. 15).
2. The Chairman of the AGBM, Ambassador Raúl
Estrada-Oyuela, opened the session at the 1st meeting, on 30 October
1995. In welcoming the participants, he noted that recent work by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) had confirmed the
concerns motivating the Convention and the potential for serious
consequences of global climate change on developing countries. He
recalled the importance of the precautionary principle and the
principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and
emphasized the responsibility of developed countries to take the
lead. In view of the limited time and resources available, the
Chairman appealed to the Parties to take decisions and make progress
regarding the analysis and assessment at this session. He drew
attention to the fact that at some point the number of policies and
measures to be analysed should be limited in order to achieve
concrete results. The Chairman also welcomed two new Parties,
observing that there were now 138 Parties to the
Convention.
3. The Executive Secretary welcomed all participants to the
session. He expressed satisfaction that it had been possible to offer
funding to the full range of eligible Parties for the session. With
regard to the provisional agenda, the Executive Secretary pointed out
that the agenda formulations were deliberately brief and that the
Berlin Mandate remained the basic element in all cases. He then
introduced the documentation prepared for the session. In his
comments on the work of the session, he noted the importance of
balancing the aim of comprehensiveness with the need to begin
narrowing the focus. He also observed that the AGBM was a forum where
the results of technical analysis could be presented for assessment
rather than a place where such analysis could be most usefully
undertaken.
4. At the first meeting on 30 October, the Chairman and the
Executive Secretary explained the basis and structure of the
provisional agenda. Statements were made by seven Parties, including
one speaking on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, one speaking on
behalf of the European Community and its member States, and another
speaking on behalf of
the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS). An observer State
also made a statement. At its 1st meeting, on 30 October, the AGBM
adopted the following agenda, on the understanding that relevant
agenda items encompass all aspects in an integrated manner, including
analysis and assessment:
1. Organizational matters:
(a) Adoption of the agenda;
(b) Organization of work of the session;
(c) Organization of the work of future sessions.
2. Election of officers other than the Chairman.
3. Strengthening the commitments in Article 4.2(a) and
(b):
(a) Policies and measures;
(b) Quantified emission limitation and reduction objectives within
specified time-frames.
4. Continuing to advance the implementation of Article
4.1.
5. Possible features of a protocol or another legal
instrument.
6. Report on the session.
5. At the 1st meeting, on 30 October, the Chairman recalled that
there would be services available for one morning and one afternoon
meeting with interpretation each day. The AGBM agreed to proceed on
the basis of the proposed schedule of work contained in annex II of
document FCCC/AGBM/1995/3/Add.1. The Chairman recalled that observers
from non-governmental organizations were welcome on the conference
room floor before and after meetings but that while meetings were in
progress they should remain in the seating area allocated to
them.
6. At the 6th meeting, on 2 November, the secretariat reported on
the situation surrounding the availability of information relating to
national communications from Annex I Parties and the in-depth review
reports. In this context, a significant amount of material will be
available for the discussion on this subject planned for the third
session.
7. The Executive Secretary recalled the dates of future sessions,
taking account of the decision by the Bureau of the Conference of the
Parties (COP) regarding the timing of COP 2:
- 3rd session: 4 - 8 March 1996
- 4th session: Several days during the period 8 - 19 July 1996
(reserved for COP 2)
- 5th session: 21 - 25 October 1996
- 6th session: 10 - 14 March 1997
Meetings in 1996 will be held in Geneva. The balance of the 1997
calendar remains uncertain pending the establishment of the dates of
COP 3. It was hoped that six weeks of meeting time would be available
to the Convention in both 1996 and 1997.
8. The Executive Secretary took stock of the existing and emerging
requests to the secretariat for documentation for the third session.
He indicated that the workload appeared manageable but that if
difficulties arose priorities would need to be
established.
9. The Executive Secretary reported that Parties were being
notified, through formal communications to Permanent Missions, of
their contributions to the trust fund for the core budget of the
UNFCCC due on 1 January 1996. Copies of this communication were
circulated. He reminded Parties of the need to contribute to the
trust fund for participation in the UNFCCC process to assure the
availability of adequate funding for the next session. Further, he
invited Parties to contribute to the trust fund for supplementary
activities under the UNFCCC. The Executive Secretary appealed to
Parties to pay their contributions in advance of the 1 January due
date to avoid disruption in the work under the Convention. He also
urged delegations to ensure that their colleagues in New York were
fully informed of the importance of the decision to be taken by the
General Assembly on financing the cost of conference services of
meetings of the COP and its subsidiary bodies.
10. The representative of Canada announced a contribution to the
special voluntary fund for participation of Can$65,000. The
representative of the United States noted that his Government was
providing an official to the secretariat, along with the associated
bilateral funding. The Executive Secretary and his colleagues
responded to a number of questions, thanked contributors for their
support and recalled that financial and budgetary matters would be
taken up at the next session of the Subsidiary Body for
Implementation (SBI).
11. The lists of attendance at the second session are given in
annex I below.
12. The AGBM welcomed the fact that sufficient resources had been
available in the special voluntary fund to offer funding to all 106
eligible Parties and that so many were able to participate in the
session. The AGBM expressed its gratitude to contributors and hoped
that it would be possible to maintain such a high level of
participation at future sessions.
13. The documents prepared for the AGBM at its second session are
listed in annex II below.
14. At the 1st meeting, on 30 October, the Chairman reported on
his consultations with regional groups in respect of nominations for
the Bureau of the AGBM. He recalled that he had been authorized by
COP 1 to undertake such consultations and indicated that these
consultations would continue.
15. The Chairman provided further reports on his consultations at
the 3rd and 5th meetings, on 31 October and 1 November. At the 7th
meeting, on 3 November, the Chairman outlined a proposal to complete
the election of officers. A Vice-Chairman and a Rapporteur would be
elected, with the Rapporteur also serving as Second Vice-Chairman.
The Chairmen of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological
Advice (SBSTA) and the SBI would be ex officio members. Six
advisers would be invited by the Chairman to participate in Bureau
meetings on an equal footing with the elected and ex officio
members. Financial assistance for participation in meetings by
members and advisers would be provided in accordance with the normal
practice whereby one delegate from an eligible Party receives
funding. The arrangements would be reviewed at COP 2. A
representative of the host Government of COP 3 would be invited to be
associated with the deliberations after COP 2.
16. As no consensus was reached among all regional groups, the
Chairman undertook to continue his consultations at the third
session.
17. The AGBM considered agenda item 3 at its 1st meeting, on 30
October. Statements were made by representatives of five Parties,
including one speaking on behalf of the Group of 77 and China and
another speaking on behalf of the European Community and its member
States.
18. The AGBM considered sub-item 3 (a) at its 1st and 2nd
meetings, on 30 October, and at its 3rd meeting, on 31 October.
Statements were made by representatives of 20 Parties, including one
speaking on behalf of the Group of 77 and China, one speaking on
behalf of the European Community and its member States and another
speaking on behalf of the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS). A
statement was also made by the representative of an observer
State.
19. The AGBM considered sub-item 3 (b) at its 3rd meeting, on 31
October. Statements were made by representatives of 13 Parties,
including one speaking on behalf of the European Community and its
member States and another speaking on behalf of the Alliance of Small
Island States (AOSIS).
20. On the basis of a proposal by the Chairman, the AGBM, at its
7th meeting, on 3 November, adopted the following
conclusions.
21. In opening this item, there was general agreement that it was
critical to the Berlin Mandate process, guided by the provisions of
the Convention and its objective. The goal of the process is,
inter alia, to strengthen the commitments in Article 4.2(a)
and (b) through an approach that elaborates policies and measures as
well as setting quantified emission limitation and reduction
objectives within specified time-frames, in accordance with the
Berlin Mandate.
Policies and measures (Agenda item 3
(a))
22. The AGBM began its substantive deliberations by considering the elaboration of policies and measures for Annex I Parties. In accordance with the Berlin Mandate and the conclusions of the first session, the AGBM discussed questions surrounding the analysis and assessment of policies and measures, including environmental and socio-economic costs and
benefits for all Parties, and the results that could be achieved.
The responsibilities of individual Annex I Parties to undertake
and/or report on technical and analytical work was highlighted, and
the need for all Parties in the AGBM to assess analytical results was
also confirmed.
23. It was concluded that it would not be possible in the time
available to conduct a detailed analysis and assessment of all
possible policies and measures. The need to begin to narrow down, but
not close off, the range of policies and measures under consideration
was generally agreed. Some Parties considered the second session too
early to undertake this task. Others sought to launch this effort by
identifying policies and measures on which to focus or those already
subject to some form of analysis and assessment, by proposing
criteria to evaluate policies and measures or by suggesting vehicles
and procedures to achieve that end, including additional submissions
from Parties. This narrowing down exercise would have to advance at
the third session if the process were to remain on track to COP 3.
Some Parties requested the secretariat to conduct an analysis and
assessment of policies and measures on a selected sector in order to
gain experience.
24. A number of different approaches to the treatment of policies
and measures were advanced: an annex-based approach reflecting
different degrees of common actions, a sectoral and cross-sectoral
approach, a technology approach, an instrument approach, a menu of
options approach, and mechanisms to develop these. Technology
research, development and diffusion were seen as particularly
important. The need to respect differing national circumstances,
starting points and approaches and the other underlying
considerations mentioned in paragraph 2 (a) of the Berlin Mandate was
emphasized.
25. The AGBM welcomed the progress report from the Annex I Experts
Group relating to their project on policies and measures for common
action by Annex I Parties. It requested the Experts Group to take
account of the views expressed during the session and looked forward
to receiving regular reports and, in due course, substantive
analytical inputs.
26. The AGBM looked forward to reviewing the aspects of the IPCC
Second Assessment Report related to policies and measures. This was
seen as a substantive source of information for its deliberations at
the third session. The AGBM invited the Chairman and other concerned
officers of the IPCC to present the IPCC findings at that
time.
27. The AGBM invited the Parties sponsoring the Climate Technology
Initiative to make a progress report to the third
session.
28. The AGBM invited Parties to make preliminary submissions to
the secretariat by 15 January 1996 offering additional ideas and
comments on policies and measures, including, if possible,
information on cost-effectiveness and on environmental and
socio-economic costs and benefits for all Parties and on how they
could be incorporated in a protocol or another legal instrument. It
requested the secretariat to compile these submissions, in their
original language(s).
29. The AGBM requested the secretariat to organize an informal
workshop focusing on policies and measures and recognizing the
linkage with quantified objectives, in conjunction with the third
session. Parties were invited to communicate their views on the
organization and content of such a meeting to the secretariat by 30
November 1995. On the basis of these views and expressions of
interest, the secretariat was requested to invite a number of Parties
and organizations, including those from non-Annex I Parties, to make
presentations, while taking care to ensure an adequate balance among
presenters.
30. The AGBM further requested the secretariat, drawing on national communications, available in-depth review reports, the IPCC Second Assessment Report and comments from Parties, to develop, for consideration at the third session, a document that would follow up on document FCCC/AGBM/1995/6.
Quantified emission limitation and reduction objectives within specified time-frames
(Agenda item 3 (b))
31. The AGBM held an initial exchange of views on the
establishment of quantified limitation and reduction objectives
within specified time-frames, such as 2005, 2010 and 2020, for
anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of
greenhouse gases for Annex I Parties (FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1, decision
1/CP.1, para. 2 (a)).
32. The AGBM reiterated the importance of such objectives. Some
Parties underlined the linkages between them and the elaboration of
policies and measures. The importance of the underlying
considerations included in paragraph 2 (a) of the Berlin Mandate was
also reaffirmed.
33. Existing approaches for quantified objectives, such as those
listed in document FCCC/AGBM/1995/4, annex, section II, paragraph 4,
were mentioned as options. A number of alternative approaches were
also proposed, such as cumulative, multi-Party, differentiated, or
collective objectives, as well as a system of emissions budgets (that
is, a certain amount of emissions over a given period, for example,
five years). Such options required further elaboration and
definition, and Parties were invited to do that.
34. The need for the AGBM to assess the results of available
analyses of a number of such objectives was stressed. The third
session of the AGBM would present an initial opportunity to make
progress on assessing relevant information and narrowing the range of
options, taking account, inter alia, of the environmental and
socio-economic costs and benefits for all Parties.
35. Concepts relating to differentiation among Annex I Parties and
equitable burden sharing, including possible indicators or criteria
for differentiation in the context of sustainable development and
vehicles to implement this, were also thought to need further study
by Parties.
36. With regard to time-frames, it would be necessary to combine
the time needed to achieve shifts in patterns of emissions and
removals with the need for accountability and stock-taking at regular
intervals. The concept of providing incentives for early action
merited further elaboration and consideration by
Parties.
37. The AGBM looked forward to reviewing the aspects of the IPCC
Second Assessment Report related to quantified emission limitation
and reduction objectives. This was seen as a substantive source of
information for its deliberations at the third session. The AGBM
invited the Chairman and other concerned officers of the IPCC to
present the IPCC findings at that time.
38. The AGBM requested the secretariat to organize an informal
meeting, in conjunction with the third session, featuring technical
presentations by Parties and intergovernmental organizations of
existing analytical information on quantified objectives and
time-frames and their impacts. Parties were invited to communicate
their views on the organization and content of such a meeting to the
secretariat by 30 November 1995. On the basis of these views and
expressions of interest, the secretariat was requested to invite
Parties and organizations, including those from non-Annex I Parties,
to make technical presentations, taking care to ensure an adequate
balance among presenters.
39. The AGBM further requested the secretariat to prepare, for
consideration at the fourth session, a document reviewing possible
indicators that could be used to define criteria for differentiation
among Annex I Parties.
40. The AGBM considered this matter at its 3rd and 4th meetings,
on 31 October and 1 November. Statements were made by representatives
of 21 Parties, including one speaking on behalf of the Group of 77
and China, one speaking on behalf of the European Community and its
member States and another speaking on behalf of the Alliance of Small
Island States (AOSIS). A statement was also made by a representative
of an intergovernmental organization.
41. On the basis of a proposal by the Chairman, the AGBM, at its
7th meeting, on 3 November, adopted the following
conclusions.
42. A number of Parties reported on measures being undertaken to
implement Article 4.1, including cooperation between Parties. Parties
not included in Annex I to the Convention expressed readiness to
advance the preparation of their initial communications, taking into
account Article 4.3, 4.5 and 4.7 of the Convention and paragraph 2
(b) of the Berlin Mandate, in order to supplement their sustainable
development.
43. It was noted that the SBSTA, at its second session, would
consider recommendations from the secretariat on guidelines for the
preparation of national communications from Parties not included in
Annex I to the Convention (FCCC/SBSTA/1995/3, para. 35).
44. The AGBM took note with appreciation of the position paper of
the Group of 77 and China on the organization of a workshop/forum on
initial communications of non-Annex I Parties (see
FCCC/AGBM/1995/MISC.1/Add.4). The need for a workshop/forum, in which
experts from Parties not included in Annex I could exchange
experiences on the methodologies for, and preparation of, the initial
communications, was discussed. The AGBM invited its Chairman to
consult the Chairman of the SBSTA, as well as the Chairman of the
Group of 77 and China, and Parties not include in Annex I, and
requested them, with the assistance of the secretariat, to organize
such a workshop/forum in conjunction with the second session of the
SBSTA, that is, before the next session of the AGBM. The technical
experience gained by Annex I Parties when using the methodologies and
preparing their communications would be helpful to the
workshop/forum.
45. The importance of the timely availability of financial
resources to enable Parties not included in Annex I, including least
developed countries, to prepare their communications was stressed.
The AGBM noted that the Global Environment Facility (GEF) was taking
initial steps in this regard and encouraged the GEF to ensure an
adequate and timely flow of funding for this purpose.
46. The need for a discussion at the third session on innovative, efficient and
state-of-the-art technologies and know-how was
reiterated.
ANOTHER LEGAL INSTRUMENT
47. The AGBM considered this matter at its 5th meeting, on 1
November. Statements were made by representatives of 14 Parties,
including one speaking on behalf of the European Community and its
member States and another speaking on behalf of the Alliance of Small
Island States (AOSIS).
48. On the basis of a proposal by the Chairman, the AGBM, at its
7th meeting, on 3 November, adopted the following
conclusions.
49. The AGBM held preliminary discussions on this item. It
identified a number of issues, including institutional linkages
between the Convention and a protocol or another legal instrument,
the role of the secretariat, reviews of commitments of Annex I
Parties, reporting and review mechanisms, subsidiary bodies, the use
of annexes and the need to avoid duplication and overlap, and took
note of a number of proposals in this regard. The secretariat was
requested to examine how institutions and processes established by
the Convention could be linked to such a future protocol or another
legal instrument and to present a paper to the AGBM for consideration
at a future session.
50. A number of Parties reiterated their support for the draft
protocol submitted by AOSIS (see A/AC.237/L.22). Some Parties
welcomed the outline of a possible protocol structure as presented by
Spain on behalf of the European Community (see
FCCC/AGBM/1995/MISC.1/Add.3, pp. 37-42).
51. A protocol or another legal instrument should cover all
greenhouse gases, their emissions by sources and removals by sinks,
and all relevant sectors.
52. The AGBM requested the secretariat to prepare a review of
existing relevant Conventions. The review should cover the nature of
their commitments, common but differentiated responsibilities of the
Parties, institutional arrangements and linkages between the
conventions and their protocols or any other legal instruments, and
possible regional parameters for consideration by the AGBM at its
fourth session.
53. The AGBM invited Parties to make preliminary submissions to
the secretariat by 15 January 1996 offering additional ideas on
possible features of a protocol or another legal instrument. It
requested the secretariat to compile all relevant submissions in
their original language(s).
54. At the 7th meeting, on 3 November, the Chairman, in the
absence of an elected Rapporteur, presented the first part of the
draft report of the session (FCCC/AGBM/1995/L.2). The AGBM considered
and adopted the first part of the draft report.
55. At its 7th meeting, on 3 November, the AGBM requested the
Chairman, with the assistance of the secretariat, to complete the
report, taking into account the discussions of the AGBM, the
conclusions on agenda items 2, 3, 4 and 5 and the need for editorial
adjustments.
56. A statement was made on behalf of environmental
non-governmental organizations.
57. The Chairman, after thanking all participants for their
constructive cooperation, declared the second session of the AGBM
closed.
1. The second session of the AGBM was attended by representatives
of the following 101 Parties to the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change:
Albania
Algeria
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Bangladesh
Benin
Bolivia
Botswana
Brazil
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Cameroon
Canada
Central African Republic
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Cuba
Czech Republic
Denmark
Ecuador
Egypt
Eritrea
Estonia
European Community
Finland
France
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Greece
Guinea
Guyana
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Jordan
Kuwait
Lao People's Democratic
Republic
Latvia
Lesotho
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malaysia
Malawi
Maldives
Malta
Mauritania
Mexico
Micronesia (Federated
States of)
Myanmar
Netherlands
New Zealand
Niger
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Republic of Korea
Rumania
Russian Federation
Samoa
Saudi Arabia
Sierra Leone
Slovak Republic
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sudan
Sweden
Switzerland
Thailand
Togo
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkmenistan
Uganda
United Kingdom of
Great Britain and
Northern Ireland
United States of America
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Venezuela
Viet Nam
Zambia
Zimbabwe
2. The session was also attended by observers from the following
States not parties to the Convention:
Angola
Belgium
El Salvador
Gabon
Honduras
Iran (Islamic Republic of)
Madagascar
Morocco
Niger
Sierra Leone
South Africa
United Republic of
Tanzania3. The following United Nations offices and programmes
were represented:
United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development (DPCSD)
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development
(UNCTAD)
4. The following specialized agencies of the United Nations and
related organizations were represented:
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization,
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (UNESCO/IOC)
WMO/UNEP Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
World Trade Organization (WTO)
5. The following intergovernmental and non-governmental
organizations were represented:
Intergovernmental organizations:
International Energy Agency (IEA)
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
South Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP)
Non-governmental organizations:
Alliance for Responsible Atmospheric Policy / Arlington, USA
Association Française du Froid/Alliance Froid Climatisation Environnement/
Paris, France
Business Council for a Sustainable Energy Future / Washington, USA
Canadian Electrical Association / Montreal, Canada
Centre d'Etudes Pratiques de la Négociation Internationale / Geneva, Switzerland
Climate Action Network Latin America (CANLA) / Santiago, Chile
Climate Action Network UK / London, UK
Climate Action Network-South East Asia / Quezon City, Philippines
Climate Network Europe / Brussels, Belgium
Edison Electric Institute / Washington, USA
Environmental Defense Fund / Washington, USA
Friends of the Earth International (FOE) / Amsterdam, Netherlands
Foundation for International Environmental Law and Development / London, UK
Germanwatch / Bonn, Germany
Global Climate Coalition / Washington, USA
Global Industrial and Social Progress Research Institute / Tokyo, Japan
Greenpeace International / Amsterdam, Netherlands
Institut de recherche sur l'environnement / La Roche sur Foron, France
International Academy of the Environment / Conches, Switzerland
International Chamber of Commerce / Paris, France
International Climate Change Partnership / Arlington, USA
International Council of Women / Paris, France
International Petroleum Industry Environmental Conservation Association /
London, UK
International Society on Optics within Life Sciences / Münster, Germany
National Coal Association / Washington, USA
Tata Energy Research Institute / New Delhi, India
The Climate Council / Washington, USA
The Skies Above Foundation / Victoria, Canada
The Woods Hole Research Center / Woods Hole, USA
Union Internationale des Producteurs et Distributeurs d'Energie Electrique
(UNIPEDE) / Paris, France
Union of Concerned Scientists / Washington, USA
University of Tübingen - Center for International Relations / Tübingen, Germany
US Climate Action Network (CAN-USA) / Washington, USA
Verification Technology Information Centre / London, UK
World Coal Institute / London, UK
World Council of Churches / Geneva, Switzerland
Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy / Wuppertal, Germany
WWF-International / Gland, Switzerland
The following documents were prepared for the AGBM at its second
session:
FCCC/AGBM/1995/3 Provisional agenda and annotations
FCCC/AGBM/1995/3/Add.1 Annotations to the provisional agenda,
including suggestions for the organization of work
FCCC/AGBM/1995/4 Lists of issues identified by
Parties
FCCC/AGBM/1995/5 Annotated compilation of information relevant to
the Berlin Mandate process
FCCC/AGBM/1995/6 Synthesized list of policies and measures
identified by Annex I Parties in their national
communications
FCCC/AGBM/1995/MISC.1/Adds.1, Implementation of the Berlin
Mandate: comments 2, 3 and 4 from Parties
FCCC/AGBM/1995/L.2 Draft report of the Ad Hoc Group on the Berlin Mandate on its second session