GENERAL
FCCC/SBSTA/1997/3
30 January 1997
ENGLISH ONLY
SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE
Fifth session
Bonn, 25-28 February 1997
Item 8 of the provisional agenda
1. The Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice
(hereinafter referred to as "the SBSTA"), at its fourth session,
requested the secretariat to prepare a revision of the uniform
reporting format contained in document FCCC/SBSTA/1996/15 reflecting
sections agreed by the contact group and leaving unchanged sections
that could not be addressed (FCCC/SBSTA/1996/20). It was also agreed
that Parties could submit views on the unresolved issues related to
the proposed uniform reporting format, namely sections F to H of
annex I as well as annex II, and on methodological issues by 15
January 1997. Submissions received by the secretariat are contained
in miscellaneous document FCCC/SBSTA/1997/MISC.3.
2. Annexes I and II of the present note contain the uniform
reporting format that was proposed further to the work of the contact
group convened at the fourth session of the SBSTA.
3. Sections A to E of annex I were revised as agreed in the
contact group. One outstanding issue, to be addressed by the group,
is whether to reflect paragraph 1 (f) of decision
5/CP.1(1) in section B of annex
I.
4. The discussion on section F was not finalized.
5. Sections G and H of annex I, as well as annex II were not
discussed. However, when discussing the contents of section D, it was
agreed to address the issue of indirect and negative impacts under
'Impacts encountered' in section H of annex I.
6. At its fourth session, the SBSTA decided that a contact group would be convened during or on the margins of the fifth session to continue the consideration of the uniform reporting format and of the list of methodological issues (FCCC/SBSTA/1996/20).
A. Description of project
1) Title of project:
2) Participants/actors:
Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item "Function within activity".
|
|
Name of organization(a): |
|
Name of organization (English): |
|
Department: |
|
Acronym: |
|
Acronym (English): |
|
Function within activity: |
(standard classifiers to be developed) |
Street: |
|
Post code: |
|
City: |
|
Country: |
|
Telephone: |
|
Fax: |
|
E-mail: |
|
WWW-URL: |
|
Contact person (for this activity): |
------------------------------------- |
Surname: |
|
First name, middle name: |
|
Job title: |
|
Direct tel: |
|
Direct fax: |
|
Direct E-mail: |
|
a) Organization includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organizations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.
3) Activity:
|
|
General description: |
|
Type of project:a) |
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state): |
|
Activity starting date: |
|
Expected activity ending date: |
|
Stage of activity:b) |
Mutally agreed / in progress / completed |
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c) |
|
Technical data:d) |
|
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine
for each type of activity what the minimum data requirements
are.
4) Cost (to the extent possible):
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of the project in US$: |
|
|
|
|
AIJ component in US$: |
|
|
|
|
US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent: |
|
|
|
|
Describe briefly how costs are determined:
5) Mutually agreed assessment
procedures:
|
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations mentioned is reported under
section A.2 above.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or
endorsement
Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this
pilot phase require prior acceptance, approval or endorsement by the
Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which
shall be shown as follows:
(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the
designated national authority of one participating Party with the
concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by
attached letters issued by the relevant national
authorities;
(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted
separately by the designated national authority of each and every
participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports
have been received from all participating Parties.
1) For the activity:
* First report and joint reporting: please add copies of letters
of endorsement by each designated national authority of Parties
involved in the activity.
* Subsequent reports:
Activity was: suspended
terminated earlier
Describe:
2) This report is a joint report:
Yes, forward copy of agreement/endorsement by the designated national authorities involved
No
3) General short comment by the government(s) if
applicable:
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national
economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities
and strategies
|
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented
jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided.
Failing that, a qualitative description should be given. If
quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted
using the update(s). (If the amount of quantative information is too
large, the source could be indicated.)
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail: |
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits? |
Yes/no |
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail: |
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits? |
Yes/no |
Describe economic benefits in detail: |
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits? |
Yes/no |
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities
implemented jointly projects that bring about real, measurable and
long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate
change that would not have occurred in the absence of such
activities
1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including
methodologies applied:
2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
Description of the scenario, including methodologies
applied:
Fill in the following tables as applicable:
Summary table: Projected emission reductions:
|
GHG |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
... |
Year X |
A) Project baseline scenario |
CO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
CH4 |
|
|
|
|
|
N2O |
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa) |
CO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
CH4 |
|
|
|
|
|
N2O |
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A ) |
CO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
CH4 |
|
|
|
|
|
N2O |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect |
CO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
CH4 |
|
|
|
|
|
N2O |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
Summary table: Actual emission reductions:
|
GHG |
Year 1 |
Year 2 |
... |
Year X |
A) Project baseline scenario |
CO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
CH4 |
|
|
|
|
|
N2O |
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa) |
CO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
CH4 |
|
|
|
|
|
N2O |
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A ) |
CO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
CH4 |
|
|
|
|
|
N2O |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect |
CO2 |
|
|
|
|
|
CH4 |
|
|
|
|
|
N2O |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
F. Additionality to financial obligations of Parties
included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the
financial mechanism as well as to current official development
assistance flows
Please indicate all sources of project funding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of
environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other Parties,
particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement
the provisions of the Convention. In this process, the developed
country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of
endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country
Parties
|
|
|
|
Endogenous capacity supported or enhanced:
|
|
|
|
(DEV or ENH) |
|
1) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations listed is reported under section A.2 above.
H. Additional comments, if any, including any
practical experience gained or technical difficulties, effects,
impacts or other obstacles encountered
Fill in as appropriate:
1) Any practical experience gained:
2) Technical difficulties:
3) Effects encountered:
4) Impacts encountered:
5) Other obstacles encountered:
6) Other:
1. Designated national authority for activities
implemented jointly
A) Please fill in if not already communicated or if
changes have occurred.
|
|
Name of the national authority : |
|
Name of the national authority (English): |
|
Department: |
|
Acronym: |
|
Acronym (English): |
|
Function within activity: |
(standard classifiers to be developed) |
Street: |
|
Post code: |
|
City: |
|
Country: |
|
Telephone: |
|
Fax: |
|
E-mail: |
|
WWW-URL: |
|
Contact person (for this activity): |
------------------------------------- |
Surname: |
|
First name, middle name: |
|
Job title: |
|
Direct tel: |
|
Direct fax: |
|
Direct E-mail: |
|
B) Describe the structure of the
programme:
2. Process for obtaining
approval
A) Brief description of procedure:
B) Description criteria for acceptance of an activity
implemented jointly:
a) Decision 5/CP.1:
|
|
|
b) Other criteria:
|
|
|
3. Description of programme
features:
4. Summary of activities:
|
|
|
|
|
CO2 |
CH4 |
N2O |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) For example using IPCC classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation,
restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture;
industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
1. For decisions adopted by the Conference of
the Parties at its first session, see document
FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1
GE.97-