Distr.

GENERAL

FCCC/SB/1995/1

16 August 1995


Original: ENGLISH

SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE

SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR IMPLEMENTATION

First sessions

Geneva, 28 August - 1 September 1995

Item 3 (a) of the provisional agendas


OTHER MATTERS ARISING FROM DECISIONS OF THE

CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES


COMMUNICATIONS FROM ANNEX I PARTIES:

PROGRESS REPORT ON IN-DEPTH REVIEWS

Note by the secretariat

I. BACKGROUND

1. The Conference of the Parties at its first session (COP 1), by its decision 2/CP.1 (see FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1), provided guidance on the review of first communications from Parties included in Annex I to the Convention, including provisions for the in-depth review of first national communications from such Parties. The present note documents progress achieved on work on the in-depth reviews as mandated by this decision and by decisions 9/2 (see A/AC.237/55, annex I) and 10/1 (see A/AC.237/76, annex I) of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Framework Convention on Climate Change.



II. SCHEDULE FOR THE IN-DEPTH REVIEWS

2. Table 1 provides an update on the dates of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession of Parties included in Annex I to the Convention and on the national communications received following the entry into force of the Convention. Table 2 summarizes the schedule of in-depth reviews undertaken so far and the dates of the country visits. So far, eight in-depth reviews of national communications have taken place. The reports of these and a number of additional reviews are expected to be ready for submission to the subsidiary bodies before their second sessions.

 

GE.95-

3. According to decision 2/CP.1, paragraph 2 (a), national communications "should be subject to an in-depth review as soon as possible, but within one year of receipt by the secretariat". Owing to shortage of funding and/or scheduling difficulties, however, it will not be possible to fulfil this obligation entirely. The subsidary bodies may wish to take note of this. Nevertheless, sufficient resources will be available to review all communications received from Annex I Parties, before COP 2.



III. REPORTS ON THE IN-DEPTH REVIEWS

4. In accordance with decision 2/CP.1, paragraph 2 (d), executive summaries of the reports of the in-depth reviews will be distributed to all Parties and accredited observers. These summaries will be one to two pages in length and will be available in the six official languages of the United Nations. The reports of the in-depth reviews will be made available in their original language only. In view of the expected demand, the reports will be distributed to all Parties and accredited observers, rather than only on request, as previously envisaged.



IV. SELECTION OF TEAMS

5. Under the guidance of the Chairmen of the subsidiary bodies, the interim secretariat has selected experts for participation in the in-depth reviews from among the names provided by Parties and intergovernmental organizations, with the aim of involving as many Parties as possible and taking due account of the need for various professional skills and language abilities. The composition of the teams working on the in-depth reviews that are currently under way is summarized in table 2. To date, only 29 Parties have nominated national experts to participate in the in-depth reviews. The secretariat would like to encourage other Parties to nominate experts for participation in the in-depth reviews, particularly since certain professional skills and language combinations are not well covered by the current nominees.



TABLE 1. COMMUNICATIONS OVERVIEW

Annex I

Parties

Date of

ratification

Communication

due

Communication

received

Australia

30.12.92

21.09.94

19.09.94

Austria

28.02.94

29.11.94

23.09.94

Belarus*

-

-

-

Belgium*

-

-

15.03.95

Bulgaria

12.05.95

10.02.96

-

Canada

04.12.92

21.09.94

07.02.94

Czech Republic

07.10.93

21.09.94

17.10.94

Denmark

21.12.93

21.09.94

01.09.94

E.E.C.

21.12.93

21.09.94

-

Estonia

27.07.94

25.04.95

06.05.94

Finland

03.05.94

01.02.95

30.01.95

France

25.03.94

23.12.94

06.02.95

Germany

09.12.93

21.09.94

28.09.94

Greece

04.08.94

02.05.95

23.03.95

Hungary

24.02.94

25.11.94

22.11.94

Iceland

16.06.93

21.09.94

-

Ireland

20.04.94

19.01.95

15.11.94

Italy

15.04.94

14.01.95

04.04.95

Japan

28.05.93

21.09.94

20.09.94

Latvia

23.03.95

21.12.95

-

Lithuania

24.03.95

22.12.95

-

Luxembourg

09.05.94

07.02.95

-

Netherlands

20.12.93

21.09.94

20.09.94


* Countries that have not yet ratified the Convention.



TABLE 1. (continued)

Annex I Parties

Date of ratification

Communication due

Communication received

New Zealand

16.09.93

21.09.94

21.09.94

Norway

09.07.93

21.09.94

21.09.94

Poland

28.07.94

26.04.95

02.02.95

Portugal

21.12.93

21.09.94

25.01.95

Romania

08.06.94

06.03.95

14.03.95

Russian Federation

28.12.94

28.09.95

-

Slovak Republic

25.08.94

24.05.95

-

Spain

21.12.93

21.09.94

28.09.94

Sweden

23.06.93

21.09.94

20.09.94

Switzerland

10.12.93

21.09.94

21.09.94

Turkey*

-

-

-

Ukraine*

-

-

-

United Kingdom

08.12.93

21.09.94

07.02.94

United States of America

15.10.92

21.09.94

21.09.94

Liechtenstein

22.06.94

22.03.95

25.10.94

Monaco

24.11.92

21.09.94

25.10.94


* Countries that have not yet ratified the Convention.

As stipulated in Article 4.2(g) of the Convention, any Party not included in Annex I may, in its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, or at any time thereafter, notify the Depositary that it intends to be bound by subparagraphs 4.2(a) and (b). Monaco notified the Depositary of its intention to be bound by these subparagraphs on 24 November 1992. Liechtenstein intends to follow the same procedure as Monaco.

TABLE 2. IN-DEPTH REVIEWS OF NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM ANNEX I PARTIES

UNDERTAKEN UP TO 16 AUGUST 1995

Country visit

Origin of experts nominated by Governments

Experts from

Developing countries

Economies in transition

Annex II Parties

IGOs*

Sweden

(13-17 March 1995)

Brazil

Bulgaria

United States of America

-

Czech Republic

(2-5 May 1995)

Kenya

Poland

-

-

United States of America

(22-26 May 1995)

Philippines

Russian Federation

Sweden

IEA

Canada

(29 May-2 June 1995)

Mexico

Czech Republic

Japan

OECD

Australia

(26 June-30 June 1995)

Egypt

Slovak Republic

United Kingdom

IEA

New Zealand

(3-7 July 1995)

Sri Lanka

Slovak Republic

United Kingdom

-

Japan

(3-7 July 1995)

Bangladesh

Republic of Korea

-

United States of America

IEA

Denmark

(14-18 August 1995)

China

Hungary

Italy

OECD


The teams include a coordinator from the interim secretariat, who may be assisted by a colleague or a consultant.

* IGO: Intergovernmental organization

OECD: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

IEA: International Energy Agency