GENERAL
FCCC/AGBM/1995/3/Add.1
13 October 1995
Original: ENGLISH
AD HOC GROUP ON THE BERLIN MANDATE
Second session
Geneva, 30 October - 3 November 1995
Item 1 (a) of the provisional agenda
(a) Adoption of the agenda
1. The provisional agenda for the second session of the AGBM is
presented for adoption. The provisional agenda is based on the
provisions of the Berlin Mandate (FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1, decision
1/CP.1) and the conclusions reached by the AGBM at its first session.
With respect to the analysis and assessment, these conclusions
provide that "the purpose of the analysis and assessment is to
assist, in an iterative manner, the negotiation of a protocol or
another legal instrument. In this context, the analysis and
assessment and the other elements of the Berlin Mandate process have
to be well integrated in order to be mutually reinforcing" and "while
the initial focus will be on analysis and assessment, the relative
consideration of the elements set out in paragraph 2 (a) to 2 (f) of
the Berlin Mandate will increase as the process advances"
(FCCC/AGBM/1995/2, para. 19 (c) and (e)).
GE.95-
2. At its first session, the AGBM decided to "take decisions, at
its second session, on further work, on who will undertake it and on
completion dates" (FCCC/AGBM/1995/2, para. 19 (i)). The provisional
agenda has been prepared on the understanding that these decisions
will be taken within the context of specific agenda items
rather than under a separate item relating to further work. In this
way, it is hoped that the requests for inputs and further work can be
linked closely to the issues at hand and that overlapping discussions
can be avoided. It may, however, be necessary to take stock of the
magnitude of the overall package of requests, including those
already requested at the first session, to ensure that it can be
delivered in the time available between sessions, bearing in mind the
capacity of the secretariat and other bodies.
(b) Organization of work of the
session
(i) Documentation
3. A list of documents relating to the provisional agenda, as well
as other documents available at the session, is contained in annex I.
In view of the limited time between sessions, several of the
documents will be issued shortly before the session opens, and one,
the thematic index to the compilation of comments from Parties, is
unlikely to be available.
(ii) Schedule
4. The scheduling of meetings for the session will be based on the
availability of facilities during normal working hours, when services
are available for one meeting with interpretation from 10 a.m. to 1
p.m. and from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. There will also be some facilities for
informal meetings without interpretation. Delegations are urged to
use these facilities fully by starting all meetings promptly at the
scheduled time. A suggested approach to the organization of work is
contained in annex II.
(c) Organization of the work of future
sessions
5. It may be useful to look ahead to the programme and structure
of the work of future sessions of the AGBM in the light of the
conclusions reached at the second session. The Chairman may also
provide an oral report on any decisions of the Bureau of the
Conference of the Parties (COP) relating to the date and venue of the
second session of the COP and to the schedule of meetings under the
Convention in 1996 and 1997.
6. It will be necessary for the AGBM to elect its remaining
officers. The COP, after designating the Chairman of the AGBM,
authorized him to undertake consultations with the regional groups in
respect of nominations for the Bureau of the AGBM (see
FCCC/CP/1995/7, para. 18). Since it was not possible to conclude this
item at the first session, the Chairman undertook to continue his
consultations (FCCC/AGBM/1995/2, para. 13) and will report on the
results.
7. The COP agreed to begin a process to enable it to take
appropriate action for the period beyond 2000, including the
strengthening of the commitments of Annex I Parties, through the
adoption of a protocol or another legal instrument. This process
will, inter alia, aim both to elaborate policies and measures
as well as to set quantified emission limitation and reduction
objectives within specified time-frames, such as 2005, 2010 and 2020
(FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1, decision 1/CP.1, preamble and para. 2 (a)).
These two elements are very closely related; there is an evident
linkage between the adequacy of policies and measures and the
achievement of quantified objectives within specified time-frames.
Nevertheless, it is proposed that the two elements be considered at
this point as two separate sub-items of the same agenda item in order
to facilitate, and provide more focus for, the
discussions.
8. There is also a linkage between each of these sub-items and
item 5 of the provisional agenda, "Possible features of a protocol or
another legal instrument". Thus, certain features directly related to
one or other sub-item may be considered initially under that
sub-item.
9. In considering the further work and inputs required under each
sub-item, the AGBM may wish to identify the need for technical inputs
and to assess whether these would be provided in time by the
intergovernmental technical advisory panels to be established by the
Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice.
(a) Policies and measures
10. The Berlin Mandate provides that "the process will include in
its early stages an analysis and assessment, to identify possible
policies and measures for Annex I Parties which could contribute to
limiting and reducing emissions by sources and protecting and
enhancing sinks and reservoirs of greenhouse gases. This process
could identify environmental and economic impacts and the results
that could be achieved with regard to time horizons such as 2005,
2010, and 2020" (FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1, decision 1/CP.1, para.
4).
11. This analysis and assessment might be advanced at the second
session in two respects:
(a) Parties or groups of Parties may wish to contribute to
the analysis and assessment by bringing forward analytical
information they consider relevant. This could include information
from their national experiences, for example, as reflected in their
national communications, and information from authoritative sources.
Relevant information may include assessments of promising policies
and measures and their impacts, as well as proposals on how policies
and measures may best be identified. The purpose of such a discussion
would be to gain a better appreciation of promising measures for
further consideration and to begin the process of elaborating the
policies and measures to be included in the protocol or another legal
instrument; and
(b) The AGBM may also wish to take stock of the
information on policies and measures that is currently available, or
in preparation, and, in accordance with the conclusions reached at
its first session (FCCC/AGBM/1995/2, para. 19 (i)), decide on
what further work will be required, on who will undertake it
and on completion dates. Any resource implications of such requests,
and capacities to respond in time, must be borne in
mind.
12. In view of the significant array of potential policies and
measures available to respond to climate change, and the
impracticality of undertaking an analysis and assessment of all of
them, Parties may wish to begin to narrow the range of policies and
measures that are considered relevant for the purposes of the Berlin
Mandate and for analysis and assessment. Attention is drawn to
section I and the appendix of document FCCC/AGBM/1995/4 on lists of
issues identified by Parties. At the first session, and in subsequent
submissions, some Parties referred to the nature of policies and
measures that would be the focus of the Berlin Mandate process. They
also identified specific categories of policies and measures which
merit attention, as well as providing concrete examples of specific
policies and measures.
13. The AGBM may wish to consider possible vehicles for
undertaking the analysis and assessment, in addition to the documents
submitted and their consideration in the AGBM. Panel discussions,
workshops and informal meetings have been mentioned by some Parties
as complementary means of analysis and assessment. These activities
could take place as part of an AGBM session, on the margins of a
session (for example, during evenings or weekends) or independently
from a session and could be organized by the secretariat, by a Party
or Parties, or by other entities. In order to be effective, careful
preparation and organization would be necessary. An analysis of the
budgetary implications of any concrete proposal would be
required.
14. In addition to the document mentioned in paragraph 12 above,
the following documents may be relevant to the discussion of this
sub-item (see annex I for full titles):
- Implementation of the Berlin Mandate: comments from Parties
(FCCC/AGBM/1995/MISC.1 and Add.1)
- The draft protocol proposed by Trinidad and Tobago on behalf of
the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and the proposals from
Germany for further elements of a protocol (A/AC.237/L.23 and
Add.1)(1)
- Review of the adequacy of Article 4, paragraph 2 (a) and (b):
comments from Parties and other member States (FCCC/CP/1995/MISC.1
and Add.1 and A/AC.237/MISC.43 and Add.1)
- Annotated compilation of information relevant to the Berlin
Mandate process (FCCC/AGBM/1995/5); and Review of the adequacy of
commitments in Article 4, paragraph 2 (a) and (b): annotated
compilation of international, peer-reviewed literature
(A/AC.237/83)
- Policies and measures identified in national communications from
Annex I Parties (FCCC/AGBM/1995/6)
The AGBM will also receive a progress report from the Annex I
Parties on the work being carried out for them by the joint project
of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and the
International Energy Agency on policies and measures for "common
action" (see FCCC/AGBM/1995/2, para. 19 (f) (vii)).
15. Following discussion on the topics mentioned above, the
conclusions of the AGBM on this sub-item could address points such
as:
(a) Any preliminary results from the analysis and
assessment;
(b) Criteria for identifying promising policies and measures,
taking account of experiences and impacts;
(c) Considerations pertaining to the approach to be used in incorporating policies and measures in the protocol or another legal instrument (for example, degree of detail, legal character);
(d) Further work required, who should undertake it and completion
dates; and
(e) Complementary vehicles for analysis and
assessment.
(b) Quantified emission limitation and reduction objectives within specified
time-frames
16. The Berlin Mandate provides that the process will, inter
alia, aim, as the priority in the process of strengthening the
commitments in Article 4.2(a) and (b) for Annex I Parties, "to set
quantified limitation and reduction objectives within specified
time-frames, such as 2005, 2010 and 2020, for their anthropogenic
emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases not
controlled by the Montreal Protocol ..." (FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1,
decision 1/CP.1, para. 2 (a)). The AGBM may wish to have a
preliminary discussion of such quantified objectives. This would
provide an opportunity for an initial exchange of views on the scope
of the options available, such as the nature of possible objectives,
and could set the stage for the identification of a limited number of
scenarios as some delegations proposed at the first
session.
17. On the basis of discussions at the first session, and issues
raised in submissions (see FCCC/AGBM/1995/4, section II), Parties may
wish to exchange views and to bring forward substantive information
and/or proposals on issues such as:
(a) The implementation of existing commitments and the lessons
from this experience;
(b) Projections of, or trends in, emissions and removals in the
context of this sub-item;
(c) The identification and analysis of a limited number of
scenarios or objectives, including their impacts;
(d) Differentiation among Annex I Parties; and
(e) Equitable burden sharing or collective targets to address the
fair distribution of costs among Annex I Parties.
18. In addition to the document mentioned in paragraph 17 above,
the following documents may be relevant to the discussion of this
sub-item (see annex I for full titles):
- Implementation of the Berlin Mandate: comments from Parties
(FCCC/AGBM/1995/MISC.1 and Add.1)
- The draft protocol proposed by Trinidad and Tobago on behalf of
the Alliance of Small Island States (AOSIS) and proposals from
Germany for further elements of a protocol (A/AC.237/L.23 and
Add.1)
- Review of the adequacy of Article 4, paragraph 2 (a) and (b):
comments from Parties and other member States (FCCC/CP/1995/MISC.1
and Add.1 and A/AC.237/MISC.43 and Add.1)
- Annotated compilation of information relevant to the Berlin
Mandate process (FCCC/AGBM/1995/5); and Review of the adequacy of
commitments in Article 4, paragraph 2 (a) and (b): annotated
compilation of international, peer-reviewed literature
(A/AC.237/83)
19. The conclusions on this sub-item could reflect the discussion
on the above points and, in accordance with the conclusion at the
first session (FCCC/AGBM/1995/2, para. 19 (i)), include decisions on
what further work will be required, on who will undertake it and on
completion dates. Such decisions will have to take account of the
resource implications and the time required to undertake the
work.
20. The Berlin Mandate provides that the process will "not
introduce any new commitments for Parties not included in Annex I,
but reaffirm existing commitments in Article 4.1 and continue to
advance the implementation of these commitments in order to achieve
sustainable development, taking into account Article 4.3, 4.5 and
4.7" (FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1, decision 1/CP.1, para. 2 (b)). The AGBM,
in its first discussion of this matter, may wish to explore the
nature and scope of this element of the Berlin Mandate process and to
adopt initial conclusions, including those with regard to any inputs
required for the third or future sessions. Recalling that Article 4.1
applies to all Parties, the AGBM may also wish to explore, inter
alia, opportunities for advancing the implementation of
commitments related to technology (including its development,
diffusion and transfer) and communications by non-Annex I Parties, as
well as any implications for the financial mechanism of the
Convention.
21. Documents that may be relevant to this discussion include the
compilation of submissions for Parties (FCCC/AGBM/1995/MISC.1 and
Add.1) as well as the lists of issues identified by Parties
(FCCC/AGBM/1995/4, section III).
22. The AGBM may consider it useful to have an initial exchange of
views on the possible features of a protocol or another legal
instrument. Such a discussion would help in the ongoing design and
implementation of the analysis and assessment and assist in orienting
the preparations for forthcoming sessions.
23. Under this item, the AGBM may consolidate relevant elements
arising from preceding items. Delegations may also wish to comment on
issues such as:
(a) The structure and possible elements of a protocol or another
legal instrument, including the possible role and legal nature of
annexes;
(b) Any mechanisms for coordination and for review that may be
considered necessary;
(c) Institutional arrangements and processes under a protocol or
another legal instrument and their linkages with arrangements and
processes under the Convention (for example, the subsidiary bodies,
the financial mechanism, the secretariat and the process for
submission and review of national communications); and
(d) How paragraph 1 (f) of the Berlin Mandate (see
FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1, decision 1/CP.1), relating to the coverage of
all greenhouse gases, their emissions by sources and removals by
sinks, is to be reflected.
24. Documents that may be relevant to this discussion include the
compilation of submissions from Parties (FCCC/AGBM/1995/MISC.1 and
Add.1), the lists of issues identified by Parties (FCCC/AGBM/1995/4,
section IV) and the protocol proposal submitted by Trinidad and
Tobago together with comments submitted by Germany (A/AC.237/L.23 and
Add.1).
25. The AGBM may wish to adopt initial conclusions on the above
points with a view to returning to the issues and expanding the scope
of the discussion at a future session in line with progress achieved
on other aspects of the Berlin Mandate process. Any documents
required for the third or subsequent sessions should also be
requested.
26. The relatively short length of the session, as well as the nature and timing of the discussion, may affect the extent to which a draft text of the report on the work of the session could be available at the end of the session. The AGBM may wish to adopt decisions or texts of substantive conclusions under the relevant items and sub-items of the agenda and, as at the first session, authorize the Rapporteur to complete the report after the session, under the guidance of the Chairman and with the assistance of the secretariat. While every effort will be made to have conclusions available in all languages, this can only be possible if sufficient time is available for translation.
FCCC/AGBM/1995/3 Provisional agenda and annotations. Note by the
Executive Secretary
FCCC/AGBM/1995/3/Add.1 Annotations to the provisional agenda,
including suggestions for the organization of work. Note by the
Executive Secretary
FCCC/AGBM/1995/4 Lists of issues identified by Parties. Note by
the secretariat
FCCC/AGBM/1995/5 Annotated compilation of information relevant to
the Berlin Mandate process. Note by the secretariat
FCCC/AGBM/1995/6 Policies and measures identified in the national
communications from Annex I Parties. Note by the
secretariat
FCCC/AGBM/1995/MISC.1/Add.1 Implementation of the Berlin Mandate:
comments from Parties
FCCC/AGBM/1995/2 Report of the Ad Hoc Group on the Berlin Mandate
on the work of its first session held at Geneva from 21 to 25 August
1995
FCCC/AGBM/1995/MISC.1 Implementation of the Berlin Mandate:
comments from Parties
FCCC/CP/1995/7and Add.1 Report of the Conference of the Parties on its first
and Corr.1 (French only) session, held at Berlin from 28 March to 7 April 1995
and Corr.2 (Spanish only)
FCCC/CP/1995/MISC.1 Matters relating to commitments: review of the
and Add.1 adequacy of Article 4, paragraph 2 (a) and (b): comments from Parties and other member States
A/AC.237/L.23 Matters relating to commitments: review of the
adequacy of commitments in Article 4, paragraph 2 (a) and (b): letter
dated 20 September 1994 from the Permanent Representative of Trinidad
and Tobago to the United Nations in New York to the Executive
Secretary of the interim secretariat, transmitting a draft protocol
to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change on
greenhouse gas emissions reduction
A/AC.237/L.23/Add.1 Matters relating to commitments: review of the
adequacy of commitments in Article 4, paragraph 2 (a) and (b): letter
dated 22 September 1994 from the Federal Ministry for the
Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety of Germany to the
Executive Secretary of the interim secretariat, transmitting
proposals for further elements of a protocol to the
Convention
A/AC.237/83 Matters relating to commitments: review of the
adequacy of commitments in Article 4, paragraph 2 (a) and (b):
Annotated compilation of international, peer-reviewed
literature
A/AC.237/MISC.43 Matters relating to commitments: review of the
and Add.1 adequacy of Article 4, paragraph 2 (a) and (b): comments
from Parties or other member States
FCCC/SBSTA/1995/3 Report of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and
Technological Advice on the work of its first session held at Geneva
from 28 August to 1 September 1995
FCCC/SBI/1995/5 Report of the Subsidiary Body for Implementation
on the work of its first session held at Geneva on 31 August
1995
|
|
Monday 30 October |
|
3 p.m. - 6 p.m. |
Item 1: Organizational matters: (a) Adoption of the agenda; (b) Organization of work of the session. Item 2: Election of officers other than the
Chairman. Item 3: Strengthening the commitments in Article 4.2(a) and (b): (a) Policies and measures. |
Tuesday 31 October |
|
10 a.m. - 1 p.m. |
Item 3: Strengthening the commitments in Article 4.2(a) and (b): (a) Policies and measures (continued); (b) Quantified emission limitation and reduction objectives within specified time-frames. |
3 p.m. - 6 p.m. |
Item 3: Strengthening the commitments in Article 4.2(a) and (b): (b) Quantified emission limitation and reduction
objectives within specified time-frames
(continued). Item 4: Continuing to advance the implementation of Article 4.1. |
Wednesday 1 November |
|
10 a.m. - 1 p.m. |
Item 5: Possible features of a protocol or another legal instrument. |
3 p.m. - 6 p.m. |
Informal consultations on conclusions. |
Thursday 2 November |
|
10 a.m. - 1 p.m. |
Informal consultations on conclusions. |
3 p.m. - 6 p.m. |
Item 1: Organizational matters: (c) Organization of the work of future
sessions. Informal consultations on conclusions. |
Friday 3 November |
|
10 a.m. - 1 p.m. |
Informal consultations on conclusions. |
3 p.m. - 6 p.m. |
Item 6: Report on the session. |