In respond to the mandate by the COP, the Chairs of the SBSTA and the SBI, sent a
message (133 kB) to Parties (12 March, 2013) signalling their intention to organize an
in-session workshop under the structured expert dialogue at SB 38 and inviting Parties to submit
their views with regard to which available information should be considered at that workshop. The
submissions from Parties can be found here
The COP agreed that the 2013-2015 review will periodically assess (a) The adequacy of the long-term
global goal in the light of the ultimate objective of the Convention; and (b) Overall progress made
towards achieving the long-term global goal, including a consideration of the implementation of the
commitments under the Convention.
In addition, regarding the “expert consideration of the inputs”, the COP decided to
establish a structured expert dialogue to ensure the scientific integrity of the review. Under the
guidance of the subsidiary bodies, the structured expert dialogue will consider available material
through regular scientific workshops and expert meetings. The dialogue will be facilitated by two
co-facilitators, one from Annex I and one from non-Annex I, and they will report on work done by the
structured expert dialogue to the COP.
Parties also agreed on a prompt start of the review and requested the SB to take the steps necessary
in 2013 to start the consideration of inputs without delay at SB38. They also invited SB to
gather and compile information relevant for conducting the review.
See decision 1/CP.18 (pages
15-16, para 79-91)
Parties continued to discuss the scope of the 2013-2015 review under the AWG-LCA. In Durban, the
COP decided to consider its further definition of the scope with a view to taking a decision at COP18.
The COP agreed that it will conduct the review with the assistance of the SBSTA and the SBI, and the
work will be supported by expert consideration of the inputs. The COP further agreed that it will
define the “expert consideration of the inputs” to provide technical support to the
In addition, it agreed that the review will be conducted based on various information, including;
IPCC reports, national information, reports from UN agencies and observed impacts from regional
See decision 2/CP.17 (pages
28-29, para 157-167).
The issue of the 2013-2015 review has been negotiated under the agenda of a shared vision for a
long-term cooperative action of the AWG-LCA. In Cancun, the COP agreed to reduce global GHG emissions
to hold the increase in the global average temperature below 2°C above preindustrial levels (so
called, the 2°C goal), and recognized the need to consider strengthening the long-term global goal
on the basis of the best available scientific knowledge, including in relation to a global average
temperature rise of 1.5°C, in the first review.
See decision 1/CP.16 (page 3,
A stand-alone chapter for the review was included in the same decision. In this chapter, the COP
decided to periodically review the adequacy of the long-term global goal and overall progress towards
achieving it, starting in 2013 and concluding by 2015. It also decided to consider strengthening the
goal i.e., 1.5 degree temperature rise.
The COP will take appropriate action based on the outcome of the review in 2015.
See decision 1/CP.16 (pages
23-24, para 138-140)