Results phase II
| These are listed in the order added to the page - additions will always be at the bottom. Some contributors may have submitted more than one set of results - please check the whole page. When submitting graphics, please bear in mind that jpeg was designed for continuous-tone images such as photographs. It does a terrible job of compressing images of text and graphs, producing a lot of artifacts. Please try to submit in a lossless format such as gif or png. |
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 ECOFYS
|
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 CICERO
With the approach we used for attribution calculation the climate output indicators requested are not a direct result of the calculations. We could generate the climate indicators requested by scaling our reference run with the relative attributions, but as I'm not sure how you plan to compile the results we won't do this unless we are requested to. |
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 DEA-CAT
See also presentation below |
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 CSIRO
See revised version below |
|
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 LBNL
|
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 RITE The assumptions/conditions of our model runs are as follows:
The attribution of the region was determined by subtracting the result data for the case where the emission from the region of interest is excluded from calculation for the assumed emission period that is from the start year to the end year from the result data for the case where the emissions from all the four regions are considered. Each attached Excel file contains nine sheets corresponding to the combinations of the three future emissions scenarios and the three emission end years.
|
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 UIUC
Methodology of calculations:
|
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 JCM
|
|
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 GRAPE (first submission)
See revision below |
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 ISAM
|
|
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 NIWA
|
|
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 UKMO
|
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 RIVM
See draft full report below These gif files contain the figures of the RIVM phase-2 report, which is not ready for publication yet. The graphs include short explanations. Hopefully this will be enough for now to decide what data to use from RIVM and other groups for the synthesis.
|
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 CSIRO
See revised version below |
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 GRAPE (second submission)
Revised phase 2 result of the GRAPE model is attached. I attached MSword file because there was an indication that my pdf file cannot be read. I found a mishap in temperature contribution calculation and revised percentage share and one related graph. This revision does not effect the main calculation and it is only related to the contribution assessment. The global scale basic assessment from page 1 is not consistent with phase 1. |
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 RIVM
|
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 CSIRO
This is a short note on studies about different ways of treating the non-linear aspects (concentrating on the dependence of radiative forcing on CO2 concentration). It uses the 13 groups of the RIVM group, because the treatment of non-lieanrity will matter most as one gets down to smaller groups (i.e. the national level). |
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 Intervention presentation including plots comparing temperature and sea level metrics, by gas, for the differential, the marginal, and the time slice method.
|
|
Last updated: January 2003 |
| These are listed in the order added to the page - additions will always be at the bottom. Some contributors may have submitted more than one set of results - please check the whole page. When submitting graphics, please bear in mind that jpeg was designed for continuous-tone images such as photographs. It does a terrible job of compressing images of text and graphs, producing a lot of artifacts. Please try to submit in a lossless format such as gif or png. |
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 ECOFYS
|
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 CICERO
With the approach we used for attribution calculation the climate output indicators requested are not a direct result of the calculations. We could generate the climate indicators requested by scaling our reference run with the relative attributions, but as I'm not sure how you plan to compile the results we won't do this unless we are requested to. |
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 DEA-CAT
See also presentation below |
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 CSIRO
See revised version below |
|
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2002 LBNL
|
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 RITE The assumptions/conditions of our model runs are as follows:
The attribution of the region was determined by subtracting the result data for the case where the emission from the region of interest is excluded from calculation for the assumed emission period that is from the start year to the end year from the result data for the case where the emissions from all the four regions are considered. Each attached Excel file contains nine sheets corresponding to the combinations of the three future emissions scenarios and the three emission end years.
|
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 UIUC
Methodology of calculations:
|
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 JCM
|
|
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 GRAPE (first submission)
See revision below |
Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2002 ISAM
|
|
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 NIWA
|
|
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 UKMO
|
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 RIVM
See draft full report below These gif files contain the figures of the RIVM phase-2 report, which is not ready for publication yet. The graphs include short explanations. Hopefully this will be enough for now to decide what data to use from RIVM and other groups for the synthesis.
|
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 CSIRO
See revised version below |
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 GRAPE (second submission)
Revised phase 2 result of the GRAPE model is attached. I attached MSword file because there was an indication that my pdf file cannot be read. I found a mishap in temperature contribution calculation and revised percentage share and one related graph. This revision does not effect the main calculation and it is only related to the contribution assessment. The global scale basic assessment from page 1 is not consistent with phase 1. |
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 RIVM
|
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 CSIRO
This is a short note on studies about different ways of treating the non-linear aspects (concentrating on the dependence of radiative forcing on CO2 concentration). It uses the 13 groups of the RIVM group, because the treatment of non-lieanrity will matter most as one gets down to smaller groups (i.e. the national level). |
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2002 Intervention presentation including plots comparing temperature and sea level metrics, by gas, for the differential, the marginal, and the time slice method.
|
|
Last updated: January 2003 |
