|
Submissions by non-governmental organizations
|
2011
|
|
FOR SUBMISSIONS BY PARTIES PLEASE FOLLOW THIS LINK.
http://unfccc.int/documentation/submissions_from_parties_in_2011/items/5900.php
Further views on the elements for the development of a work programme and a possible forum on
response measures.
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2011/2,
paragraph 60 and FCCC/SBI/2011/7,
paragraph 128
Submissions to the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention: Ideas
and proposals on the elements of paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan.
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/3,
paragraph 23 and FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/8,
paragraph 27
Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Proposals
for upcoming activities under the Nairobi work programme, taking into consideration the information
included in the annex to document FCCC/SBSTA/2011/L.13.
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2011/L.13
Views from relevant organizations on the following matters:
(a) The process to enable least developed country Parties to formulate and
implement national adaptation plans, building upon their experience in preparing and implementing NAPAs;
(b) The modalities and guidelines for least developed country Parties and other developing
country Parties to employ the modalities formulated to support national adaptation plans.
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2011/L.16,
paragraph 7
Approaches to address loss and damage associated with climate change impacts in developing
countries that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change to enhance adaptive
capacity.
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2011/7
Views on a range of methodological issues for activities relating to REDD-plus.
-
Environmental Investigation Agency,
Global Witness Limited, Humane Society International, Rainforest Foundation UK, Wetlands International
and a non-admitted organization (see below) (submitted 21 September 2011)
-
Women's Environment &
Development Organization (WEDO) (submitted 20 September 2011)
-
Center for International
Environmental Law (CIEL) (submitted 19 September 2011)
-
ClientEarth and World Resources
Institute (WRI) (submitted 19 September 2011)
-
MRV - Global Witness
Limited, Care International, ClientEarth, Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental
Investigation Agency (EIA), Forest Peoples' Programme (FPP), Greenpeace International, Humane
Society International, Rainforest Foundation Norway, Rainforest Foundation UK, Tebtebba Foundation,
Wetlands International and non-admitted organizations (see below) (submitted 19 September 2011)
-
Safeguards - Global Witness
Limited, Care International, Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL), Environmental
Investigation Agency (EIA), Forest Peoples' Programme (FPP), Greenpeace International, Humane
Society International, Rainforest Foundation Norway, Rainforest Foundation UK, Tebtebba Foundation,
Wetlands International and non-admitted organizations (see below) (submitted 19 September)
-
Reference Levels - Global
Witness Limited, Wetlands International, Humane Society International, Environmental Investigation
Agency, The Rainforest Foundation, and a non- admitted organization (see below) (submitted 19
September 2011)
-
Tropical Forest Group (TFG)
(submitted 20 September 2011)
-
WWF (submitted 19 September
2011)
-
Care International on behalf of
Accra Caucus (submitted 16 September 2011)
-
Forest Peoples' Programme
(FPP) (submitted 16 September 2011)
-
Greenpeace International
(submitted 19 September 2011)
-
Wetlands International
(submitted 16 September 2011)
-
Climate Action Network International
(CAN International) (submitted 16 September 2011)
-
The Nature Conservancy (TNC)
(submitted 15 September 2011)
-
Amazon Environmental Research
Institute (IPAM), Conservation International (CI), Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), Natural Resources
Defense Council (NRDC), Rainforest Alliance (RA), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Union of Concerned
Scientists (UCS), Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), Woods Hole Research Center (WHRC), World
Vision International (WVI) (submitted 6 September 2011)
-
Union of Concerned
Scientists (UCS) (submitted 29 April 2011)
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
- David Shepherd Wildlife Foundation (see Environmental Investigation Agency link above)
-
Consultative Group for International
Agricultural Research (CGIAR) (submitted 19 September)
- MRV and Safeguards - Les Amis de la Nature et des Jardins (ANJ), Centre d'Accompagnement des
Autochtones Pygmées et Minoritaires Vulnérables (CAMV), Centro de Planifación y Estudios
Sociales (CEPLAES), Council for Environmental Defense by Legality and Traceability (CODELT), Ecoforestry
Forum Inc., Environnement, Resources Naturelles et Développement (ERND Institute), Federation of
Community Forestry Users (FECOFUN), Forum pour la Gouvernance et les Droits de l'Homme (FGDH), Friends
of the Earth, Switzerland - Pro Natura, Groupe de Travail Climat REDD (GTCR), Perkumpulan HuMa, Réseau
des communicateurs de l'environnement (RCEN), Union Pour l'Emancipation de la Femme Autochtones
(UEFA), Australian Climate Justice Programme, David Shepherd Wildlife Foundation, Society for New
Initiatives and Activities (SONIA) (see Global Witness Limited links above)
- Reference Levels - David Shepherd Wildlife Foundation (see Global Witness Limited link above)
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2011/2,
paragraph 31
Update on developments in research activities relevant to the needs of the Convention.
Submissions from non-admitted observer organizations
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2010/6,
paragraph 47
Implications of the inclusion of reforestation of lands with forest in exhaustion as afforestation
and reforestation clean development mechanism project activities.
Submissions from non-admitted observer organizations
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2010/L.15,
paragraph 1
Views on appeals against CDM Executive Board decisions.
Submissions from non-admitted observer organizations
- CDM Watch (see ClientEarth link above)
For mandate see FCCC/CMP/2010/L.8, paragraph 18 and 19
Views on the issue of materiality under the clean development mechanism.
Submissions from non-admitted observer organizations
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2010/12/Add.2
- Decision 3/CMP.6, paragraphs 30 and 31
Views on carbon dioxide capture and storage in geological formations as clean development mechanism
project activities.
Submissions from non-admitted observer organizations
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2010/12/Add.2,
Decision 7/CMP.6, paragraph 4
Information and views relating to modalities for the operationalization of the work programme and a
possible forum on response measures.
Submission from non-admitted observer organization
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2010/L.7,
paragraphs 93-94
Further views and relevant information on progress made and gaps as well as views on new activities
that may be needed to achieve the objective and expected outcomes of the Nairobi work programme.
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2010/L.20,
paragraph 5
Views on the items relating to a work programme for the development of modalities and guidelines
listed in Decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 46.
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1,
paragraphs 46 and 47, Decision 1/CP.16
Views and information on elements to be included in the work programme on loss and damage.
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2010/L.7
Views on the composition of, and modalities and procedures for, the Adaptation Committee, including
linkages with other relevant institutional arrangements.
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2011/MISC.1
Information and views on issues that could be addressed at the joint workshop on matters relating
to Article 2, paragraph 3, and Article 3, paragraph 14, of the Kyoto Protocol.
For mandate see FCCC/SB/2011/MISC.1
Views on the elaboration of market-based and non-market-based mechanisms and the evaluation of
various approaches in enhancing the cost-effectiveness of, and promoting, mitigation actions
-
Amazon Environmental Research
Institute (IPAM) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
BusinessEurope (submitted 22
February 2011)
-
Carbon Markets and Investors
Association (CMIA) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Civic Exchange (submitted 22
February 2011)
- Climate Action Network International (CAN International) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
The Corner House (submitted 22
February 2011)
-
Environmental Defense Fund (EDF),
Amazon Environmental Research Institute (IPAM), Conservation International (CI), Natural Resources
Defense Council (NRDC), The Nature Conservancy, Rainforest Alliance, Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS),
Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and World Vision International (WVI) (submitted 22 February
2011)
-
Environmental Investigation Agency
(EIA) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
European Chemical Industry
Association (CEFIC) on behalf of the European Fluorocarbons Technical Committee and members of the Global
Fluorocarbon Producers Forum which include non-admitted observer organizations (submitted 22 February
2011)
-
Federation of Electric Power
Companies of Japan (FEPC) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
FERN and Friends of the Earth
USA (part of Friends of the Earth International) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Focus on the Global South, The
Corner House, ECONEXUS, Fairwatch Association, Gender CC-Women for Climate Justice and various
non-admitted organizations (see below) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Fondazione Lombardia per
l'Ambiente (FLA) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Friends of the Earth International
(FOEI) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Global Forest Coalition (GFC)
(submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Institute for Agriculture and Trade
Policy (IATP) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Institute for Global Environmental
Strategies (IGES) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
International Centre for Trade and
Sustainable Development (ICTSD) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
International Chamber of Commerce
(ICC) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
International Emissions Trading
Association (IETA) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Natural Resources Defense Council
(NRDC), Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) (submitted 22
February 2011)
-
Network of Regional Governments for
Sustainable Development (nrg4SD) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Swedish Society for Nature
Conservation (SSNC) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
Tebtebba Foundation (submitted
22 February 2011)
-
Tropical Forest Group
(TFG) (submitted 22 February 2011)
-
World Business Council for
Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (submitted 22 February 2011)
Submissions from non-admitted organizations
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2011/MISC.5
|
|
2010
Information and views that may be relevant to the completion of the intermediate review of the
amended New Delhi work programme, including information on best practices and lessons learned from its
implementation and on remaining barriers to the effective implementation of Article 6 of the
Convention
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2010/10,
paragraph 67
Arrangements for Intergovernmental Meetings - Ways to enhance the engagement of observer
organizations
-
Business Council for Sustainable
Energy (BCSE), Carbon Markets & Investors Association (CMIA), Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC),
International Council for Sustainable Energy (ICSE), International Emissions Trading Association
(IETA) (submitted 01 September 2010)
-
Climate Action Network International
(CAN) (submitted 15 August 2010)
-
Federation of Electric Power
Companies of Japan (FEPC) (submitted 12 August 2010)
-
Friends of the Earth International
(FOEI) (submitted 18 August 2010)
-
GenderCC-Women for Climate Justice
(GenderCC) on behalf of Life e.V., Women in Europe for a Common Future (WECF), Women's Environment
and Development Organisation (WEDO) ( submitted 09 September 2010)
-
Global Witness on behalf of the
Ecosystems Climate Alliance (submitted 16 August 2010)
-
Global Legislators Organisations for
a Balanced Environment (Globe EU) (submitted 27 August 2010)
-
ICLEI - Local Governments for
Sustainability (ICLEI) (submitted 17 August 2010)
-
International Chamber of Commerce
(ICC) (submitted 16 August 2010)
-
Clean Energy Nepal (CEN), Energy
Crossroads (EC), European Youth Forum (YFJ), Federation of Young European Greens (FYEG), International
Federation of Liberal Youth (IFLRY), International Federation of Medical Students Association (IFMSA),
International Forestry Student Association (IFSA), Jeunes Volontaires pour l'Environnement (JVE),
Service Civil International (SCI), SustainUS, UK Youth Climate Coalition (UKYCC), World Association of
Girl Guides and Girl Scouts (WAGGGS) (submitted 20 August 2010)
-
Joint submission by Climate Action
Network-International Secretariat (ENGO Focal Point), International Federation of Agricultural Producers
(Farmers* Focal Point), ICLEI-Local Governments for Sustainability (LGMA Focal Point), GenderCC (Women
and Gender* Focal Point), Service Civil International (YOUNGO* Focal Point) (submitted 31 August
2010)
-
Keidanren (submitted 16 August
2010)
-
World Business Council for
Sustainable Development (WBCSD) (submitted 16 August 2010)
-
WWF International (WWF)
(submitted 16 August 2010)
* Based on their request, the above groups are recognized as constituencies on a provisional
basis pending a final decision of their status before COP 17/CMP 7.
For mandate see FCCCC/SBI/2010/10,
paragraph 167
Standardized baselines under the clean development mechanism
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2010/6,
paragraph 94
Views and information on the effectiveness of the Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability
and adaptation to climate change in fulfilling its objective, expected outcome, scope of work and
modalities
Other submissions from non-admitted organizations
|
|
|
|
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2010/6,
paragraph 20
|
|
Modalities and procedures for the development of standardized baselines
|
|
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2009/L.10
|
|
Adaptation Fund under the Kyoto Protocol
|
|
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2009/8, paragraph
37
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
Possible further actions on the implementation of Article 4, paragraph 8, of the Convention and
decisoins 5/CP.7 and 1/CP.10
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2009/8, paragraph
45
|
|
Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change submissions under
the area of adaptation planning and practices
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2008/6, paragraph
63
|
|
Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change submissions under
the area of socio-economic information
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2008/6, paragraph
51
|
|
Views on possible improvements to emissions trading and the project-based mechanisms.
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2009/L.2,
paragraph 2
|
|
Further views on information on potential environmental, economic and social consequences,
including spillover effects, of tools, policies, measures and methodologies available to Annex I
Parties.
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2009/L4,
paragraph 4
|
|
Ideas and proposals on the elements of paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan.
*Not an admitted observer organization
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/8,
paragraph 25 and FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/L.10,
paragraph 2(a)
Other submissions from non-admitted organizations
For mandate see FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/17,
paragraph 26 (b)
|
|
Views and proposals for further elaboration of the options, elements and issues contained in
the annex "Options and proposals on how to address definitions, modalities, rules and guidelines for
the treatment of land use, land-use change and forestry" (LULUCF).
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2009/L.3,
paragraph 3
|
|
Views on the areas of focus set out in section IV of the terms of reference for the review
and assessment of the effectiveness of the implementation of Article 4, paragraphs 1(c) and 5, of the
convention agreed at the twenty-ninth session of the Subsidiary Body of Implementation.
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2008/L.28
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/SBI/2009/MISC.4
|
|
Views on issues relating to indigenous people and local communities for the development and
application of methodologies.
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2008/13
(paragraph 45)
Other submission
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/SBSTA/2009/MISC.1
|
|
Experiences and views, including country-specific information where possible, on needs for
technical and institutional capacity-building and cooperation in, inter alia, the implementation of
methodologies for estimating and monitoring changes in forest cover and associated carbon stocks and GHG
emissions, incremental changes due to sustainable management of forests, reduction of emissions from
deforestation and forest degradation, national and subnational monitoring and reporting systems, and
methodologies for forest inventories, ground-based and remote-sensing approaches
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2008/13
(paragraph 44)
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/SBSTA/2009/MISC.2
|
|
Further elaboration of the options, elements and issues contained in annex III to the report of the
first part of the sixth session, and annex IV to the report at the resumed fifth session, including views
on how and which proposals could address cross-cutting issues (LULUCF)
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/L.19,
paragraph 8 (b)
|
|
Further input in relation to possible improvements to emissions trading and the project-based
mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/5
and annexes I and II to document FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/INF.3
Other submission
|
|
Further input in relation to possible improvements to emissions trading and the project-based
mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/5,
paragraph 22
|
|
Carbon dioxide capture and storage in geological formations as clean development mechanism project
activities
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2006/10/Add.1,
decision 1/CMP.2, paragraph 21 and FCCC/SBSTA/2007/L.19
Other submission
|
|
Information, views and proposals on paragraph 1 of the Bali Action Plan
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1,,
decision 1/CP.13 and FCCC/AWGLCA/2008/3,
paragraph 23
-
Global Witness Limited and The
Wilderness Society (corrigendum 19 December 2008)
-
Oxford Institute for Energy Studies
(OIES) (submitted 17 December 2008)
-
ICLEI - Local Governments for
Sustainability (ICLEI) (submitted 9 December 2008)
-
Rainforest Foundation UK
(RFUK) on behalf of 26 organizations and networks (submitted 7 December 2008)
-
WWF (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Third World Network (TWN) (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
The Wilderness Society
(submitted 6 December 2008)
-
The Nature Conservancy (TNC)
(submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Network of Regional Governments for
Sustainable Developments (NRG4SD) (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Life e.V. (submitted 6 December
2008)
-
International
Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
International Federation of
Agricultural Producers (IFAP) (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Heinrich Böll and Christian
Aid (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Greenpeace
International (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Global Witness Limited
(submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Germanwatch, Bread for the World and
CARE International (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Friends of the Earth International
(FOEI) (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
FERN, Friends of the Earth
International (FOEI), and Rainforest Foundation UK (RFUK) (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Environmental Investigation Agency
(EIA), Third Generation Environmentalism (E3G), Tearfund and WWF (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Environmental Investigation Agency
(EIA) (submitted 6 December 2008)
-
Climatenet (submitted 6 December
2008)
-
Climate Action Network International (CAN International) (submitted 6 December
2008)
-
Amazon Institute for Environmental
Research (IPAM), Conservation International (CI). Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), National Wildlife
Federation (NWF), Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), Tropical Forest
Group (TFG), Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), World Wildlife Fund (WWF) (submitted 6 December
2008)
-
Women’s Environment and
Development Organization (WEDO) (submitted 5 December 2008)
-
Keidanren (submitted 26 November
2008)
-
Wetlands International (submitted
20 November 2008)
-
Humane Society International
(HSI) (submitted 20 November 2008)
-
International Chamber of Commerce
(ICC) (submitted 14 November 2008)
-
International Trade Union
Confederation (ITUC) (submitted 06 October 2008)
-
International Emissions Trading
Association (IETA) (submitted 01 October 2008)
-
Woods Hole Research Center (WHRC) and
Amazon Institut for Environmental Research (IPAM) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Third World Network on
shared vision (TWN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Third World Network on multilateral
financial structure (TWN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Third World Network on technology and
Intellectual Property Rights (TWN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Third World Network on technology
transfer (TWN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Third World Network on sectoral
approaches (TWN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Oxfram International (submitted
30 September 2008)
-
Munich Climate Insurance Initiative
(MCII) (submitted 30 September and updated 6 December 2008)
-
Norwegian Forum for Environment and
Development (ForUM) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Centre for Socio-Economic Development
(CSEND) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Climate Action Network International
on shared vision (CAN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Climate Action Network International
on REDD (CAN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Climate Action Network International
on mitigation (CAN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Climate Action Network International
on adaptation (CAN) (submitted 30 September 2008)
-
Climate Action
Network International (CAN)
-
Global
Legislators for a Balanced Environment (GLOBE)
-
International
Trade Union Confederation (ITUC)
-
Wetlands
International
-
Humane Society
International (Reduced emissions from REDD)
-
Tearfund
(Disaster risk reduction in adaptation)
The latest submissions by Parties are currently available here. All submission by intergovernmental
organizations, including those received after the issuance of this document, are currently available
here.
|
|
Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: approaches to stimulate
action
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1,
decision 2/CP.13, paragraph 7 (a)
Other submission
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/SBSTA/2008/MISC.4
|
|
Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2006/11,
paragraph 21
|
|
Consideration of relevant methodological issues
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2007/5,
paragraph 19 (d) (iii)
|
|
Preparations for the second review of the Kyoto Protocol pursuant to its Article 9
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2007/9/Add.1,
decision 4/CMP.3, paragraph 6
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/SBI/2008/MISC.2
|
|
Development and transfer of technologies under the SBI
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2007/L.2,
paragraph 7
|
|
Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2007/16,
parargraph 51
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/SBSTA/2008/MISC.2
|
|
Means to achieve mitigation objectives of Annex I Parties
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2007/2,
paragraph 24
For submissions by Parties, please see FCCC/KP/AWG/2008/MISC.1
|
|
2007
|
|
A. Views on the development of a timetable to guide the completion of the work of the AWG to be
compiled by the secretariat for consideration by the AWG at its resumed fourth session
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2007/4
(paragraph 25)
|
|
B. Nairobi work programme on impacts, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Information
and views on matters relating to the availability of information on the socio-economic aspect of climate
change and improving the integration of socio-economic information into impact and vulnerability
assessments, including information on the development of socio-economic scenarios and for understanding
adaptive capacity
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2006/11
(paragraph 51)
|
|
C. Further guidance relating to the CDM. Views on carbon dioxide capture and storage in geological
formations as CDM project activities
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2006/10/Add.1
decision 1/CMP.2 (paragraphs 21 and 22)
|
|
D. Views on the implications of possible changes to the limit established for small-scale
afforestation and reforestation clean development mechanism project activities under decision
6/CMP.1
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2007/4
(paragraphs 78 and 79)
|
|
E. Comments on the scope and content on the second review under Article 9 of the Kyoto Protocol and
the preparations required for conducting the review
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2006/10/Add.1
|
|
F. Submissions on adaptation approaches, strategies, practices and technologies for adaptation at
the regional, national and local levels in different sectors, as well as on experiences, needs and
concerns
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2006/11
(paragraph 56)
|
|
G. Information on existing and emerging assesment methodologies and tools; and views on lessons
learned from their application; opportunities, gaps, needs, constraints and barriers; possible ways to
develop and better disseminate methods and tools; and training opportunities
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2006/11
(paragraph 3)
|
|
H. Mitigation potential of policies and measures
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2007/L.2
(paragraph 8)
Additional information provided by CAN International
|
|
I. Views on carbon dioxide capture and storage as clean development mechanism project
activities
For mandate see Decision
1/CMP.2 (paragraph 21)
Admitted non-governmental organizations
Submissions from organizations which are not admitted may be viewed here.
|
|
J. Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2007/4
(paragraph 39)
|
|
K. Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2006/11
(paragraph 89)
Submissions from Parties and admitted IGOs, contained in miscellaneous documents FCCC/SBSTA/2007/MISC.2 and
FCCC/SBSTA/2007/MISC.3 respectively, may be viewed here.
|
|
L. Information about external bodies and forums that could provide expert input to the work of the
AWG
For mandate see FCCC/KP/AWG/2006/4 (paragraph 20)
|
|
M. Views on the implications of possibly changing the limit established for small-scale
afforestation and reforestation CDM project activities
For mandate see Decision
1/CMP.2 (paragraph 27)
|
|
2006
|
|
A. Article 9 of the Kyoto Protocol
For mandate see FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8
(paragraph 77)
|
|
B. Implications of the situation where the issuing of certified emission reductions (CERs) for the
destruction of hydrofluorocarbon-23 (HFC-23) at new hydrochlorofluorocarbon-22 (HCFC-22) facilities could
lead to higher global production of HCFC-22 and/or HFC-23 than would otherwise occur
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2006/5
(paragraph 100)
|
|
C. Initial views on the issues to be discussed at the Dialogue on long-term cooperative action to
address climate change by enhancing implementation of the Convention
For mandate see Decision
1/CP.11 (paragraph 8)
|
|
D. Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries
For mandate see FCCC/CP/2005/5
(paragraph 81)
Submissions from Parties are contained in miscellaneous document FCCC/SBSTA/2006/MISC.5.
|
|
E. Carbon dioxide capture and storage as clean development mechanism project activities
For mandate see Decision
7/CMP.1 (paragraph 6)
|
|
2005
|
|
A. Implications of the establishment, under the clean development
mechanism, of new, hydrochlorofluorocarbon-22 (HCFC-22) facilities seeking to obtain certified emissions
reductions for the destruction of hydrofluorocarbon-23 (HFC-23)
For mandate see FCCC/SBSTA/2005/L.3 (paragraph 2)
|
|
B. Effective participation of observers
For mandate see FCCC/SBI/2004/10 (paragraph 99)
|
|