Guidelines under Articles 5, 7 and 8: Methodological Issues, Reporting and Review under the Kyoto
Protocol
|
|
|
|
Background
The Kyoto Protocol’s effectiveness will depend upon two critical factors: whether Parties follow the
Protocol’s rulebook and comply with their commitments; and whether the emissions data used to assess
compliance is reliable. Recognizing this, the Kyoto Protocol and Marrakesh Accords, adopted by CMP 1 in
Montreal, Canada, in December 2005, include a set of monitoring and compliance procedures to enforce the
Protocol’s rules, address any compliance problems, and avoid any error in calculating emissions data
and accounting for transactions under the three Kyoto mechanisms (emissions trading, clean development
mechanism and joint implementation) and activities related to land use, land use change and forestry
(LULUCF).
The Protocol’s monitoring procedures are based on existing reporting and review procedures under the
Convention, building on experience gained in the climate change process over the past decade. They also
involve additional accounting procedures that are needed to track and record Parties’ holdings and
transactions of Kyoto Protocol units - assigned amount units (AAUs), certified emission reductions
(CERs) and emission reduction units (ERUs) - and removal units (RMUs) generated by LULUCF activities.
Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Kyoto Protocol address reporting and review of information by Annex I Parties
under the Protocol, as well as national systems and methodologies for the preparation of greenhouse gas
inventories.
- Article 5 commits Annex I Parties to having in place, no later than 2007, national systems for the
estimation of greenhouse gas emissions by sources and removals by sinks (Article 5.1). It also states that,
where agreed methodologies (that is, the revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas
Inventories, see decision
2/CP.3) are not used
to estimate emissions and removals, appropriate "adjustments" should be applied (Article 5.2).
- Article 7 requires Annex I Parties to submit annual greenhouse gas inventories, as well as national
communications, at regular intervals, both including supplementary information to demonstrate compliance with
the Protocol. In addition, Article 7 states that the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the
Parties to the Protocol (CMP) shall decide upon modalities for the accounting of assigned amounts prior to
the first commitment period.
- Article 8 establishes that expert review teams will review the inventories, and national communications
submitted by Annex I Parties.
The Protocol states that guidelines for national systems, adjustments, the preparation of inventories and
national communications, as well as for the conduct of expert reviews, should be adopted by the CMP at its
first session (CMP 1), and regularly reviewed thereafter.
|
|
|
|
COP 7 and Marrakesh Accords
|
|
|
|
At COP 7, Parties reached agreement on the details of Articles 5, 7 and 8. The accounting
and reporting and
review systems set out in the Marrakesh Accords aim to be transparent so that all data, except those
designated as confidential, are to be made publicly available. At the conclusion of COP 7 some sections of
the guidelines under Articles 7 and 8 were not completed, mainly because of the need to ensure coherence with
other decisions.
In addition, the COP requested the SBSTA to develop technical standards for the purpose of ensuring the
accurate, transparent and efficient exchange of data between national registries, the clean development
mechanism registry and the transaction log.
|
|
|
|
COP 8, COP 9, COP 10 and COP 11
|
|
|
|
During these COPs Parties finalized the remaining work of the guidelines under Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the
Kyoto Protocol.
CMP 1
CMP 1 held in Montreal, Canada, in November-December 2005 adopted the Marrakesh Accords as well as the draft
CMP decisions that were negotiated after COP 7.
The CMP 1 adopted the following decisions relating to Articles 5, 7 and 8 of the Kyoto Protocol:
-
13/CMP.1 Modalities for
the accounting of assigned amounts under Article 7, paragraph 4 of the Kyoto Protocol
-
14/CMP.1 Standard
electronic format for reporting Kyoto Protocol units
-
15/CMP.1 Guidelines for
the preparation of the information required under Article 7 of the Kyoto Protocol
-
19/CMP.1 Guidelines for
national systems under Article 5, paragraph 1 of the Kyoto Protocol
-
20/CMP.1 Good practice
guidance and adjustments under Article 5, paragraph 2 of the Kyoto Protocol
-
21/CMP.1 Issues relating
to adjustments under Article 5, paragraph 2 of the Kyoto Protocol
-
22/CMP.1 Guidelines for
review under Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol
-
23/CMP.1 Terms of
service for lead reviewers
-
24/CMP.1 Issues relating
to the implementation of Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol – 1 (Training programme for members of
expert review teams)
-
25/CMP.1 Issues relating
to the implementation of Article 8 of the Kyoto Protocol – 2 (Confidential information)
|
|
|
|