Uniform Reporting Format:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
List of
Projects
A. Description of project
A. 1) Title of project: Poland/Norway Coal-to-Gas Conversion - AlJ Pilot Project
The objectives of the project as a whole are to stimulate technological and institutional changes to
demonstrate inter-fuel substitution and energy efficiency improvement as means to support the country
objectives. The total project aims at encouraging and introducing more rapid transition from coal to gas
and introducing more energy efficiency in residential buildings.
The total project has the following components:
- a coal-to-gas conversion component, involving investments in about 30 non-industrial small to medium
size heat plants (boilers) for their conversion from coal to natural gas. The projects are for residential
houses and public buildings; the new technologies include gas fired cogeneration unit of heat and
electricity, condensing boilers as well as conventional gas fired boilers;
- an energy efficiency component, involving investments in insulation of buildings and the installation
of energy efficient equipment in some hundred new residential units;
- a technical assistance component to project participants, including institutional training, project
management, environmental monitoring and nation-wide marketing.
The AIJ component of the project is funded with a grant of 1.1 million USD from the Department of Natural
Resources and Environmental Affairs of the Government of Norway. Non-AIJ related financing of the project
includes grant of 25 million USD from the GEF and further 22 million USD from the Polish National Fund for
Environmental Protection and Water Management (National Fund), voivodeship funds (VF), Environmental
Protection Bank (BOS) and private investors in Poland.
The portion of the project funded by the Government of Norway functions as an AIJ demonstration project
with the objective of assisting Parties to the UNFCCC in gaining experience on how the mechanism of AIJ
might work. The project is administered by the World Bank and is related to other Bank operations in
Poland. The GEF funding is separate from the AIJ financing.
The overall project has an estimated lifetime of 17 years and will give substantial reductions in
greenhouse gas emissions and at the same time reduce pollution. It has been planned in a manner consistent
with national priorities for sustainable energy development.
A. 2) Participants/actors:
The donor country is the Government of Norway, represented by the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign
Affairs (RNMFA), Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs. The host is the Government of
Poland, represented by the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry (MoE),
Economic Department.
The entity responsible for co-ordination and reporting on AIJ activities in Poland is the National Fund for
Environmental Protection and Water Management (NF), JI-Secretariat. The implementing agency is the
Environmental Protection Bank (BOS). Within the World Bank, the Department for Central and Eastern Europe
is charged with management of the project, while the Global Environment Department assists in development
of the AIJ component.
The host investors are the private boiler owners, public entities and self-governments.
Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from
item "Function within activity".
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisationa):
|
Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
|
|
Department:
|
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs
|
|
Acronym:
|
-
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
-
|
|
Function with activity:
|
Governmental authority responsible for committing financial resources for AIJ component and
approval of AIJ project agreements and reports (foreign investor - AIJ)
|
|
Street:
|
Victoria Street, P.O. Box 8114 Dep
|
|
Post Code:
|
0032
|
|
City:
|
Oslo
|
|
Country:
|
Norway
|
|
Telephone:
|
47-22 24 36 03
|
|
Fax:
|
47-22 24 27 82
|
|
E-mail:
|
-
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
-
|
|
Contact Person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mr. Leiro
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Jostein
|
|
Job title:
|
Head of Division
|
|
Direct tel:
|
47-22 24 36 08
|
|
Direct fax:
|
47-22 24 27 82
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
jleiro@online.no
|
a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental
organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project,
auditors, government agency closely following the activity.
Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from
item "Function within activity".
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisationa):
|
World Bank
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
World Bank
|
|
Department:
|
Environment Department
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Administration of project on behalf of World Bank - GEF and the Norwegian Government
|
|
Street:
|
1818 H Street, NW
|
|
Post code:
|
20433
|
|
City:
|
Washington DC
|
|
Country:
|
USA
|
|
Telephone:
|
(202) 473-9746
|
|
Fax:
|
(202) 522-3256
|
|
E-mail:
|
Etandberg@worldbank.org
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mr. Tandberg
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Eivind
|
|
Job title:
|
Advisor
|
|
Direct tel:
|
(202) 473-9746
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(202) 522-3256
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Etandberg@worldbank.org
|
a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental
organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project,
auditors, government agency closely following the activity.
Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from
item "Function within activity".
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisationa):
|
Ministerstwo Ochrony Srodowiska, Zasobów Naturalnych i Lesnictwa
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry
|
|
Department:
|
Economic Department
|
|
Acronym:
|
MOSZNiL
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
MoE
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Host country representative
|
|
Street:
|
Wawelska 52/54
|
|
Post code:
|
00-922
|
|
City:
|
Warsaw
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 22) 825 00 01
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 22) 825 29 73
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.mos.gov.pl
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mrs. Maliszewska
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Maria
|
|
Job title:
|
Director of Economic Department
|
|
Direct tel:
|
(+48 22) 825 17 22; 825 00 01 w. 402
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 22) 825 29 73
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Mmalisze@mos.gov.pl
|
a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental
organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project,
auditors, government agency closely following the activity.
Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from
item "Function within activity".
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisationa):
|
Narodowy Fundusz Ochrony Srodowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej, Sekretariat - JI
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management, JI-Secretariat
|
|
Department:
|
International Department
|
|
Acronym:
|
NFOSiGW
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
NF
|
|
Function within activity:
|
National Focal Point, Reporting agency
|
|
Street:
|
Konstruktorska 3A
|
|
Post code:
|
02-673
|
|
City:
|
Warsaw
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 22) 849 22 80; 849 00 80
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 22) 849 20 98
|
|
E-mail:
|
Jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.nfosigw.gov.pl
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mrs. Galon-Kozakiewicz, Ph.D
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Jolanta
|
|
Job title:
|
Head of JI-Secretariat
|
|
Direct tel:
|
(+48 22) 849 22 80; 849 00 80 ext. 504
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 22) 849 20 98
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl
|
a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental
organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project,
auditors, government agency closely following the activity.
Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from
item "Function within activity".
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisationa):
|
Bank Ochrony Srodowiska SA
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Environmental Protection Bank
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
BOS
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
BOS
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Implementing agency
|
|
Street:
|
Jana Pawla II 12
|
|
Post code:
|
00-950 Warsaw
|
|
City:
|
Warsaw
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 22) 850 88 05
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 22) 850 88 89
|
|
E-mail:
|
bos_bit2@pol.pl
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mr. Urbala, Ph.D.
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Stanislaw
|
|
Job title:
|
Director GEF Project
|
|
Direct tel:
|
(+48 22) 850 89 44
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 22) 850 88 89
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
bos_bit2@pol.pl
|
a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental
organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project,
auditors, government agency closely following the activity.
A. 3) Activity:
|
Name of organisation :
|
Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
|
|
Department:
|
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs
|
|
Acronym:
|
-
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
-
|
|
Function with activity:
|
Governmental authority responsible for committing financial resources for AIJ projects and approval
of AIJ project agreements and reports (foreign investor - AIJ)
|
|
Street:
|
Victoria Street, P.O. Box 8114 Dep
|
|
Post Code:
|
0032
|
|
City:
|
Oslo
|
|
Country:
|
Norway
|
|
Telephone:
|
47-22 24 36 03
|
|
Fax:
|
47-22 24 27 82
|
|
E-mail:
|
-
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
-
|
|
Contact Person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mr. Leiro
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Jostein
|
|
Job title:
|
Head of Division
|
|
Direct tel:
|
47-22 24 36 08
|
|
Direct fax:
|
47-22 24 27 82
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
jleiro@online.no
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation:
|
World Bank
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
World Bank
|
|
Department:
|
Environment Department
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Administration of project on behalf of World Bank - GEF and the Norwegian Government
|
|
Street:
|
1818 H Street, NW
|
|
Post code:
|
20433
|
|
City:
|
Washington DC
|
|
Country:
|
USA
|
|
Telephone:
|
(202) 473-9746
|
|
Fax:
|
(202) 522-3256
|
|
E-mail:
|
Etandberg@worldbank.org
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mr. Tandberg
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Eivind
|
|
Job title:
|
Advisor
|
|
Direct tel:
|
(202) 473-9746
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(202) 522-3256
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Etandberg@worldbank.org
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation:
|
Ministerstwo Ochrony Srodowiska, Zasobów Naturalnych i Lesnictwa
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry
|
|
Department:
|
Department of Budget and Finance
|
|
Acronym:
|
MOSZNiL
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
MoE
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Host country representative
|
|
Street:
|
Wawelska 52/54
|
|
Post code:
|
00-922
|
|
City:
|
Warsaw
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 22) 25 00 01
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 22) 25 29 73
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mrs. Chochlew
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Irena
|
|
Job title:
|
Director, Department of Budget and Finance
|
|
Direct tel:
|
(+48 22) 25 00 01 ext. 402; 25 17 22
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 22) 25 29 73
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation:
|
Narodowy Fundusz Ochrony Srodowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej, Sekretariat - JI
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
National Found for Environmental Protection and Water Management, JI-Secretariat
|
|
Department:
|
International Department
|
|
Acronym:
|
NFOSiGW
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
NF
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Reporting agency
|
|
Street:
|
Konstruktorska 3A
|
|
Post code:
|
02-673
|
|
City:
|
Warsaw
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 22) 49 22 80; 49 00 80
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 22) 49 20 98
|
|
E-mail:
|
jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.nfosigw.gov.pl/
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mrs. Galon-Kozakiewicz, Ph.D
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Jolanta
|
|
Job title:
|
Head of JI-Secretariat
|
|
Direct tel:
|
(+48 22) 49 22 80; 49 00 80 ext. 504
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 22) 49 20 98
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation:
|
Bank Ochrony Srodowiska SA
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Environmental Protection Bank
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
BOS
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
BOS
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Implementing agency
|
|
Street:
|
Przasnyska 6A
|
|
Post code:
|
01-756
|
|
City:
|
Warsaw
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 22) 633 55 22
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 22) 639 73 12
|
|
E-mail:
|
bos_bit@pol.pl
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mr. Urbala, Ph.D.
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Stanis³aw
|
|
Job title:
|
Director GEF Project
|
|
Direct tel:
|
(+48 22) 633 55 22 ext. 392
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 22) 639 73 12
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
bos_bit@pol.pl
|
All projects:
Technical data of following:
- 2212 projects under Coal to Gas Conversion Component, updated 300th of NovemberApril 1998,
- 9 projects under Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings Component, updated 30th of November
1998,
- 5 projects under Coal to Gas Conversion Component are specified in list of "stand-by"
projects.
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Poland's energy economy is dominated by coal, which is domestically produced. The related
greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution problems are huge.
The share of coal was 77% in 1991, while the share of oil and gas was 21%, one of the lowest in
continental Europe. A shift towards an oil and gas share of 53 to 73% has been estimated by the
World Bank to lead to at least 50% reduction in the carbon dioxide emissions.
One of the reasons for the widespread use of coal is the use for space heating. The use of gas for
space heating was earlier prohibited and the use of oil was held back by various measures. The aim
was to limit foreign exchange expenditures on energy imports. Coal for space heating is used both
in district heating systems, block heating plants (heating several apartments) and in individual
heating in stoves. District heating companies own about 16 GW coal fired boilers, consuming about 6
million tons of coal per year. About 3,2 GW of this capacity is, by the World Bank, considered
suitable for replacement with gas fired boilers.
Removal of the direct regulation of fuel use will result in a shift from coal to gas or oil. Coal
will for reasons of price remain the preferred fuel for relatively large boilers, where economies
of scale offsets the higher costs of coal handling and emission control equipment. Also in small
boilers, coal has until recently been the preferred fuel for economic reasons, but higher coal
prices will reduce its use in the long term.
Environmental standards have been and will be further strengthened for sulphur, particulates and
nitrogen oxide, and effective enforcement will be phased in over many years. This will accelerate
the price-driven conversion of small boilers from coal to gas. The emission standards are
administered by local authorities and linked to these is a system of fees and fines. Emissions of
sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulates, as well as carbon dioxide are taxed. The fees on
carbon dioxide are only of symbolic nature. The other fees could have some albeit small effects on
conversions from coal to gas.
There are several obstacles to conversions from coal to gas. They include lack of access to
financing, budgetary procedures of publicly owned heating companies, and lack of price incentives.
Cost savings in heat production are not felt by consumers because heat prices are subsidised. Only
the local authorities have a well defined interest in reducing costs but often lack the financial
means for investment.
For the immediate future, the conversion of coal to gas will not be financially attractive without
taking into account the global warming considerations and/or local pollution effects.The same
|
|
Description of the other Energy Efficiency Projects
|
Besides 9 projects described in the Appendix III, we received requests of two developers to make
them possible to apply for a AIJ/GEF grant under „Energy Efficiency component. Their projects
are following:
- 2 multifamily buildings (94 apartments and area 4952.5 m2 totally) in Nowy
Sacz - project of S¹deckie Towarzystwo Budownictwa
Spolecznego;
- 10 multifamily buildings (75 apartments and area 4168.6 m2 totally) in Gdanski
– project of Towarzystwo Inwestycyjne „Investing" S.A. (the request covered 37
multifamily buildings of total amount 17553.83 m2 and 10 single family buildings - but
because of too late date of completion they can not be covered by AIJ/GEF grant).
In all two cases developers have permission for construction and all projects are at the stage of
construction of foundations.
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Fuel conversion and energy efficiency measures.
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Both the Coal to Gas Conversion Component coal-to-gas component and the Energy Efficiency in New
Residential Buildings Component housing component are located throughout Poland.
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
June 30, 1995
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
June 30, 2000
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
22 individual projects, including project GPEC Gdansk from stand-by group, approved by MoE, to be
modernized under the Coal-to-Gas Conversion component are at different stages of implementation:
- one of them was commissioned,
- eleven projects are after the bidding procedure; for ten o them the „turn-key"
contracts were signed, the last one is in the course of contract negotiations,
- two next projects are just about to be announced,
- for one project the conceptual design is being prepared,
- one of the boiler owners resigned from the project implementation after the preparation of
conceptual design,
- for remaining projects grant agreements are signed; 5 projects are on stand-by (Ostrowiec
Swiêtokrzyski was withdrawn from the pipeline of the AIJ/GEF
Project).
Under the energy efficiency component of AIJ/GEF, 9 grant agreements were concluded and these
projects are at different stages of implementation:
- two projects are completed, monitoring report of one of them is being prepared,
- six projects are under construction at different stage of construction works,
- one project has not been started yet, but preparation works have been done:
- The building site is enclosed, the temporary roads have been built, power substation and water
intake are ready, the humus layer was removed and protected, part of excavations –fundaments
have been done. The contracts on construction are signed with two contractors.
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years under Coal to Gas Conversion Component;
- 50 years under Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings Component.
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
(details are available in the appendixes)
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
25 mill USD - GEF,
1.1 mill USD - grant from the Government of Norway – AIJ component,
22 mill USD - Poland (National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (NF),
Voivodeship Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (VF), BOS, owner’s
contribution (Oc))
|
|
2. Project costs
|
48 mill USD (35.5 mill USD - engaged funds for 1997)
|
|
3. Project cost-effectiveness
|
30.1 USD/tCO2* (average concerning 12 projects)See description of each individual
project (Appendix I, II, III)
|
|
4. Planned environ-mental benefits
|
292 485 tCO2/year:
291 719141 698 tCO2/year - concerning 22 projects under Coal to Gas Conversion Component
and 5 projects from the list of "stand-by" projects;
766 tCO2/year – concerning 9 projects under Energy Efficiency in New Residential
Buildings Component(total concerning 12 projects); 3 259 tCO2/year (concerning the AIJ
component of the project or 2.3% of total planned environmental benefits)..
|
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each types of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
A. 4) Cost (to the extent possible):
The project has a 1.1 million USD grant from the Government of Norway, a contribution of about 22 million
USD from Poland and a 25 million USD grant from the GEF. The Polish sources for funding vary, but are most
often a package of funding from the boiler owners themselves, the National Fund for Environmental
Protection and Water Management (NF), Environmental Protection Bank (BOS) and provincial authorities.
|
Item
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year X
|
|
Cost of the project in USD:
|
|
|
|
48 mill
|
|
AIJ component in USD:
|
|
|
|
1.1 mill
|
|
USD per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
High efficiency gas boilers
|
|
|
|
Between 11 and 43
|
|
Condensing boiler
|
|
|
|
About 60
|
|
Housing projects
|
|
|
|
Between 90 and 120
|
Describe briefly how costs are determined:
The value of the amount granted to the individual project was calculated, in particular:
- additional cost of investment and exploitation of boiler during 17 years in comparison with
- cost of new coal boiler plus a difference of cost of new condensing gas boiler as well as
- partial cost of modernisation of heating system.
The grant will allow the boiler owners to have a profitable percentage of return of the capital.the same
A. 5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organisations involved a):
|
|
5.1) General Agreement
The Government of Poland has received grant funds from the Government of Norway and from the GEF.
The World Bank is acting as Trustee of GEF Norwegian funds for the project.
On behalf of the Government of Poland, the Minister of EPNR&F is a grantee of this fund. The
MoE, through its Department of Ecological Policy, is responsible for: (a) overall co-ordination and
implementation of this project; and (b) monitoring and reviewing project activities and products to
assure that they are of a high quality and are accomplished in a cost- effective and timely manner.
Recognising the complexity of Joint Implementation Program, the Minister of EPNR&F has
established the Polish Secretariat for Joint Implementation in NF.
BOS is acting as the Implementing Agency for this project and as administrator of project
activities and funds to be used solely for the purposes of the project.
The same
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organisations
mentioned is reported under section A.2 above.
5.2) Monitoring
The sameA monitoring plan to provide data for evaluation of the quantity of greenhouse gas emissions as
well as other environmental benefits the operating costs and the energy savings have been established.
5.2.1) MONITORING OBJECTIVE
The objective of environmental monitoring for the coal-to-gas conversion component of the project is to
provide data for evaluation of pollutant emission reduction, to assess effectiveness of the operating costs
associated with conversion of coal fired boilers to natural gas ones and to evaluate energy saving.
Monitoring should ensure detailed evaluation of revenues and benefits to be reaped from the project’s
implementation.
5.2.2) COURSE OF REALISATION
To ensure use of unified data collecting procedures and their analysis, there will be one contractor
selected by competitive bidding, responsible for preparation and carrying out monitoring all over the
country at the realisation stage of the coal-to-gas conversion component of the project. The above
mentioned contractor will implement the monitoring program under supervision of the Ministry of
Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry (MoE) represented by the State Environmental
Inspectorate (PIOS).
The latter's role will consist mainly in working out the rules for monitoring performance, approval of
a monitoring implementation plan for each facility, occasional inspection of work in progress, and
verification of all the reports submitted.
PIOS will supervise environmental monitoring for all the facilities involved in the project and will
evaluate results obtained in effect of individual implementation of fuel conversion projects. The role of
Environmental Protection Bank (BOS), which is the Implementing Agency for the project, will focus on
undertaking the necessary actions ensuring that monitoring of old boilers prior to the conversion can take
place before their modification and on administration and management of the pertinent activity.
5.2.3) SCOPE OF WORK
To attain the project’s objectives the contractor will undertake the following actions:
- it will ensure taking all measurements in conformity with the Polish standards,
- it will determine the detailed program of measurement, collecting and processing of the monitored data
in co-operation with the PIOS.
The program should contain in particular:
5.2.3.1) Technical monitoring plan
Technical monitoring of coal fired boiler rooms subject to conversion to gas fuel at the implementation
phase and following realisation.
Monitoring’s objective is an ecological economic and energy-wise evaluation of the effectiveness of
conversion of about 30 non-industrial coal fired boiler rooms of up to l5 MW output to gas fired high
efficiency boilers or combined heat and power generation facilities.
Monitoring requires measurement and reporting of technical parameters and emissions of individual coal
fired boiler rooms subject to conversion.
Technical monitoring includes evaluation of the technical state of boilers and their instrumentation,
auxiliaries, quantities of fuel and electrical energy used, fuel and water balance, quantity of thermal and
electric energy produced and efficiency of heat transmission and use by recipients.
5.2.3.2) Emissions monitoring plan
Ecological monitoring of the selected pollution emissions sources to determine effects of conversion
from solid to gas fuel.
The assumptions pertain to about 30 small and medium non-industrial boiler rooms (hereinafter to be
referred to as the facilities) with a thermal output of under 5MW per boiler unit presently using solid
fuel, predominantly coal.
The scope of these assumptions includes parametric identification of the above mentioned facilities in the
aspect of ecological change resulting from conversion from solid to gas fuel.
The ecological monitoring goal is evaluation of reduction of pollution emitted into the atmosphere by the
above mentioned facilities, which will be an effect of fuel conversion as well as equipment modernisation,
on the basis of technical and emission measurements prior to and following conversion.
Realisation of the goal as defined should take place in stages, also for reasons of effective control
supported by modern data collecting techniques.
- 5.2.3.3) Performance report format
In regard of contents of the report on realisation of conversion of coal fired boiler rooms to gas fired
ones.
The report should outline in a concise form progress of realisation of coal fired boiler rooms’
conversion to the gas fired ones inclusive of the realisation stages and guidelines offered in 5.2.3.1) and
5.2.3.2) to "MONITORING PLAN FOR COAL-TO-GAS CONVERSION PROJECT".
The report's content should include a brief description of individual events accompanying project
realisation illustrated with tables and diagrams.
It should end up with conclusions useful for improvement of realisation of the other projects of the same
type and for the final evaluation of ecological, economic and technical effectiveness achieved as a result
of boiler room reconstruction in connection with conversion from coal to gas fuel.
After the contract is effective, BOS and the Contractor will develop a mutually acceptable schedule for the
pre-conversion monitoring of old coal-fired boiler facilities selected for conversion to gas-firing under
the project, including a monitoring schedule of the heat distribution and transfer systems and the end-user
building facilities supplied by the old boilers.
Similarly, BOS and the Contractor will develop a schedule for the post-conversion monitoring of new
facilities and their associated heat distribution, transfer and end-use systems.
Such schedules (Preconversion Monitoring Schedule and Post-Conversion Monitoring Schedule) will include
organisational solutions guaranteeing the starting date for the pre-conversion and post-conversion
monitoring activities at each individual project site and the access of the contractor to the individual
project site to carry out such activities.
BOS will notify the Contractor at least 3 weeks prior to the proposed monitoring start date of each
individual project site.
Within 6 weeks after the contract is effective, the Contractor shall develop a standard form, acceptable to
PIOS, for reporting pre-conversion and post-conversion monitoring activity and results for individual
conversion project, including a standard environmental report form.
The Contractor together with the Boiler Owner and the Boiler Owners' Representative shall prepare and
submit to BOS a monitoring report in accordance with the above mentioned standard form, for each individual
project realised.
BOS will ensure timely distribution of the individual reports to the concerned authorities.
Verification of the individual monitoring reports will be done by PIOS with use of its field branches and
the team of experts participating in the Monitoring Program. PIOS will establish a system of verification
procedures which should be applied once a year to all the projects and for some, at random.
PIOS will prepare for the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry a report on
verification of each individual project and the GEF Program in as entirety.
The Secretariat-JI will send the above mentioned reports to the World Bank, the Norwegian Government and
the UNFCCC - Secretariat.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
B.1) Letters of endorsement will be sent accordingly.
B. 2) This report is a jointjoint report:
- X Yes, this project has been endorsed by the following parties: the Polish Ministry of
Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry and the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
signed on 30 September 1993.The same
B. 3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
The items of the report describing the project, its implementation and its effects, have been completed by
the Government of Poland. The investor specific items have been completed by the Government of Norway. The
World Bank, as the project administrator, has provided assistance and advice in the preparation of the
joint report. The same
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio-economic and
environmental priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national
economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies.
|
|
Poland seeks energy security through stable energy deliveries at socially acceptable prices and
with a minimal damage to the environment. Among the priority actions are to diversify the primary
energy supplies and to comply with international environmental agreements to reduce air pollution
and greenhouse gas emissions. This project is designed to be fully-integrated and consistent with
the goals and development strategies of the government of Poland.
AIR PROTECTION
This is based on:
- the "Implementation Program of the National Environmental Policy till the year to
2000",
- voivodeship lists of priority projects regarding environmental protection for 1997,
- and proposals submitted by the Minister of EPNR&F.
The aim of the undertakings concerning the air pollution control is to achieve reductions of
pollutant emissions into the atmospheric air by both improving the fuel quality parameters and
replacing fuel, by installing equipment that reduces the flue gas emissions of pollutants, by
modernising and replacing technologies and by conserving energy.
1) Directions:
- Support for the undertakings leading to reductions of the emissions into the atmospheric air of
gas and particulate pollutants, by means of the modernisation and upgrading of the fuel production
and burning technologies.
- Support for the undertakings related to the rationalisation of heat systems, including the
recovery of heat, national production of highly efficient heating equipment, combined with the use
of unconventional energy sources.
2) Selection criteria for projects in the field of air protection
- elimination of low-stack emissions;
- supporting projects connected with the construction of systems supplying gas and district
heating to spas, tourist destinations and protected areas;
- improving heating efficiency, especially linked to the elimination of household stoves and
existing local boilers with low efficiency and poor technical condition through a comprehensive
modification of heating systems;
- control of gaseous and ash emissions from power generation and large hard and (lignite) brown
coal-fired energy cogeneration plants, especially having an impact on Poland's international
commitments;
- improving energy efficiency;
- modification of industrial processes in order to improve energy efficiency and reduce harmful
emissions;
- promoting non - conventional energy source projects;
supporting modern technical solutions limiting the environmental impact of and transport, in
particular city transport, in the context of exhaust fumes, noise and vibration emissions including
support in equipping monitoring services;
controlling non-ionising electromagnetic radiation. the same
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
The sameAnticipated global benefits of the total project include a 65 % reduction in CO2
emissions by converting small coal fired boilers to gas firing, and a 28 % CO2 reduction
by increasing efficiency in new residential buildings. Local benefits include virtual elimination
of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and particulates and significant reduction in nitrogen oxides
(NOx) emitted by the converted boilers.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
Yes
Planned environmental benefits:
291 719 tCO2/year (concerning 22 projects under Coal to Gas Conversion Component and 5
projects from the list of "stand-by" projects);
766 tCO2/year (concerning 9 projects under Energy Efficiency in New Residential
Buildings Component)141 698 tCO2/year (concerning 12 projects); 3 259
tCO2/year (concerning the AIJ component of the project or 2.3% of total planned
environmental benefits).
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real,
measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not
have occurred in the absence of such activities
The project cost-effectiveness expressed in the size of the grant per ton of CO2 equivalents is
for the typical high efficiency gas-fired boiler between 11 and 43 USD, while the cost of avoided emissions
from a condensing boiler would be about 60 USD. For the housing projects, the costs would seem to vary
between 90 and 120 USD per ton of CO2 equivalents. As new practices and energy saving equipment
become more common in Poland, prices are expected to drop considerably and thus help fulfil the objective
of the project more cost-effectively.
Uncontrolled emissions from black coal mines in Poland are assumed to average 20-25 m3 per ton
of coal produced. The advantage of reduced emissions of methane from coal mining is not included in the
calculations of emission benefits. Also the lifetime of the new gas-fired boilers has in the calculation of
emission benefits conservatively been estimated to last for 17 years.the same
E. 1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:
The sameIn the absence of the total project, reengineering and replacement of existing coal fired boilers
only at the end of their service life would be the most common choice of boiler owners due to a low
investment price and the familiarity with coal technology. A shift to new coal fired boilers was chosen as
the baseline knowing that this is a conservative choice for calculating the probable emission saving. The
abatement effect is thus the difference in emissions between new coal-fired boilers and new gas-fired
boilers.
E. 2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:
The sameFor both the reference case and the "with project" cases, CO2 emissions were
estimated based on: (a) annual heat demand (which is the same for the with project and reference cases);
(b) efficiency of heat supply facilities (coal-fired boilers, gas-fired condensing boilers or cogeneration
units); (c) unit emission factors for gas, LFO and coal; (d) share of heat produced by the cogeneration
unit and the peak boilers. Additional CO2 emission credits were attributed to the cogeneration
units, resulting from the displacement of the electricity now generated from coal in the national power
system at 34 percent efficiency.
Fill in the following tables as applicable:
E.2.1) Summary table: Projected emissions reductions for Coal to Gas Conversion Component (22
projects + 5 projects from the list of "stand-by" projects):
|
GHG
|
1999
|
2000
|
...
|
2013
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2 [Mg]
|
447 403
|
447 403
|
|
447 403
|
|
SO2 [Mg]
|
2 803,8
|
2 803,8
|
|
2 803,8
|
|
NOX [Mg]
|
542,7
|
542,7
|
|
542,7
|
|
Dust [Mg]
|
3 446,2
|
3 446,2
|
|
3 446,2
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa
|
CO2 [Mg]
|
155 684
|
155 684
|
|
155 684
|
|
SO2 [Mg]
|
14,3
|
14,3
|
|
14,3
|
|
NOX [Mg]
|
279,2
|
279,2
|
|
279,2
|
|
Dust [Mg]
|
0
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2 [Mg]
|
291 719
|
291 719
|
|
291 719
|
|
SO2 [Mg]
|
2 789,5
|
2 789,5
|
|
2 789,5
|
|
NOX [Mg]
|
263,5
|
263,5
|
|
263,5
|
|
Dust [Mg]
|
3 446,2
|
3 446,2
|
|
3 446,2
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2 [Mg]
|
291 719
|
583 438
|
|
4 375 785
|
|
SO2 [Mg]
|
2 789,5
|
5 579
|
|
41 842,5
|
|
NOX [Mg]
|
263,5
|
527
|
|
3 952,5
|
|
Dust [Mg]
|
3 446,2
|
6892,4
|
|
51 693
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
E.2.2) Summary table: Actual emissions reductions:
|
GHG
|
Year 1
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year X
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity dataa)
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
F. Bearing in mind that the financing of activities implemented jointly shall be additional to financial
obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial
mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows, please indicate
The same
|
Source of project funding
including pre-feasibility stage
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(converted to US dollars)
|
|
Government of Norway1
|
1.1 mill USD
|
|
GEF
|
25 mill USD
|
|
Poland (NFEP&WM, VFEP&WM, BOS, owner’s contribution)
|
22 mill USD
|
1The contribution of the Government of Norway is provided from a separate budget
line, the Norwegian Climate Fund, which has been established separate from, and in addition to, the
development assistance accounts and will not be reported as part of Norway's ODA. This contribution is
provided in addition to meet Norway's financial commitments under UNFCCC.
The Norwegian co-financing was provided in addition to the Norwegian contribution to the GEF in 1993. The
availability of extra Norwegian co-financing served to expand the project scope beyond what would have been
undertaken in the absence of this funding. Specifically, the extra Norwegian resources resulted in an
increase in the targeted number of boiler installations to be converted by the project. In effect, the
Norwegian co-financing is covering the non-GEF financed portion of the (expanded) total incremental cost
financing requirement and is additional to the financial obligations under the Convention and to regular
development financing. The Norwegian government is not seeking emission credits from its investment in the
project.
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to
other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the
Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of
endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties.
The sameDescribe briefly the transfer of environmenally sound technology and know-how including where
appropriate the type of technology, terms, education, capacity building, etc.
The introduction of improved technologies would facilitate the Government's efforts to pursue its
environmental priorities and standards aggressively and to take full advantage of the macroeconomic
conditions and other incentives that induce energy efficiency and conservation.
With largely decontrolled coal prices, a proper gas pricing policy, rising labour costs, and proper set-up
and enforcement of environmental fees and fines that reflect the true costs of environmental damage,
coal-to-gas conversion would become a financially attractive and self supporting option. The activity could
be made more self-sustaining if support were provided to develop an independent power market based on small
gas-fired cogeneration systems, high-efficiency boilers and advanced energy-efficient building equipment -
insulation, glazing, lighting and appliances - that are widely available.
The scope for using innovative technologies such as high-efficiency gas-fired boilers and packaged
gas-fired cogeneration units and for integrating improvements in heat energy supply, distribution, and
transfer systems and in end-use efficiency in buildings to improve the cost- effectiveness of the abatement
of CO2 emissions needs to be demonstrated through pilot investments. Although the technologies
are well-established, their development in Poland and in other Central and Eastern European countries has
so far been limited.
The present activity is designed as a catalyst to stimulate self-replicable technological and institutional
changes that would promote coal-to-gas conversion in small and medium-size boilers and induce more
energy-efficient practices in the architectural design and operation of new residential buildings. The
techniques, once successfully demonstrated in Poland, are replicable in the large number of
coal-dependent/intensive transition economies that have access to gas supplies.
Institutional Strengthening. The proposed project would contribute to a strengthening of Poland's
capacity, at the national and local levels and in the areas selected for project-supported conversion
activities, to: (a) plan and implement, on a national basis, the innovative and cost-effective types of
environmental improvement activities being supported under the proposed project; (b) develop experience
with the design, installation and operation of interventions to improve the heat supply system; (c) create
an institutional capability to assess global externalities such as CO2 emission abatement in
project analyses; and (d) improve the implementation of public awareness programs for energy efficiency and
conservation.
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties,
effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered
Fill in as appropriate:
H. 1) Any practical experience gained:
1) MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM EXECUTION
a) Information concerning STAP performance:
- BOS used temporary consultations of STAP members, especially connected with acceptance of technical
parameters used in final AIJ/GEF grant amount calculation for modernised boiler houses as well as partly
change in technical assumptions of energy efficiency measures in one of implemented projects of new
residential buildings.
- a working meeting of all STAP members took place between 26 - 29 August 1996. STAP members reviewed 25
applications for funding aimed at boiler houses modernisation. 15 applications were approved for
Implementation (including 12 high efficiency boilers and 3 cogenerations). The report was made and
submitted to BOS and MoE,
- the report of energy auditor relating to energy efficiency improvement in new residential buildings was
approved by 3 STAP members (1 foreign among them), within the framework of the energy efficiency for new
residential buildings component.
b) Description of consulting services and contractors:
- contract with energy auditor (Narodowa Agencja Poszanowania Energii) has been supervised;
- contract with COWI Consulting Engineers and Planners A/S acting as boiler owners' representative
(implementation of 14 individual projects of modernised boiler houses) has been supervised;
- selection of new consultant (boiler owner representative) was made; all the bids are evaluated;
- PricewaterhouseCoopers being financial auditor was asked for audit covering fiscal year 1997 (appraisal
was positive);
- consultants, accepted by WB, have reviewed bidding documents and provided their comments.
- a contract with consultant for preparation of TOR for energy auditor has been concluded,
- TAG members have been asked to give their opinion on funds allocation (27 applications) aimed at boiler
houses modernisation,
- energy auditor has been chosen - the National Energy Conservation Agency (NECA) and contract with this
firm has been signed within the framework of the energy efficiency for new residential buildings component,
- a bidding documents have been prepared and 5 firms have been chosen (agreed with the World Bank) and
these firms have been asked to submit their offer for boiler owner representative.
c) Description of the marketing plan implementation:
- organisational entities of BOS were dealing with marketing under the current activity of central and
regional bank's entities using previously prepared materials - rules and procedures for getting AIJ/GEF
grant applications and leaflets informing on AIJ/GEF project;
- the project of leaflet on efficient use of energy in new residential buildings was elaborated. This
material contains guidelines how to use the house devices to reduce the consumption of heat, electricity
and water. The firm was selected which will print leaflets, mentioned above, and also other documents, like
questionnaire (for evaluation of the tenants’ habits) and form of heat, electricity, gas and water
consumption;
- marketing activities including mass-media (interviews on AIJ/GEF Project and certain individual
projects) were undertaken during ceremonies of signing the „turn-key" contracts.
- organisational entities of BOS were dealing with marketing under the current activity of central and
regional bank's entities using previously prepared leaflets informing about this project, and contacts
with environmental protection departments of Voivodeship Authorities and the National Fund of Environmental
Protection.
d) The environmental monitoring program accomplishment:
- Energopomiar - Katowice elaborated results of pre-conversion monitoring carried out for following
projects: Ciechanow, Leczyca, Elblag, Rawa Mazowiecka ("Zamkowa Wola"), Gdynia, Pruszcz Gdanski
(Obroncow Pokoju street), Sopot, Poznan.
- MoE has prepared the environmental monitoring program (approved by the World Bank),
- all activities concerned with bidding procedure to select a company responsible for technical and
environmental monitoring of the boilers have been commenced by the GEF Project Office.
e) Training program implementation:
- the staff of GEF Project Office have been providing the BOS branches' employees, local experts and
TAG members and investors with an updated information.
- participation of one GEF Project Office’s employee in „Fourth National Energy
Conference";
- participation of one GEF Project Office’s employee in training carried out by financial auditor.
- training of specialists under the GEF project did not take place,
- the employees of GEF project office BOS have been providing the bank branch workers, local experts and
TAG members with up-to-date information.
f) Characteristics of the management system:
- AIJ/GEF Project is implemented under the existed BOS structure, which consists of the GEF Project
Office in the headquarters and the local branches of the Bank. GEF Project Office co-operates with MoE -
Economic Department, National Fund and State Inspectorate for Environmental Protection.
- Minister has assigned his plenipotentiary and an Economic Department to supervise the implementation of
the GEF Project instead of Ecological Policy Department. GEF Project is implemented under the existing BOS
structure which consists of the GEF project office in the headquarters and the local branches of the Bank.
2) EXPENDITURES AND FUNDS OF THE PROGRAM
- Use of resources for the total project (USD)
|
Category
|
At the end of the reporting period
1.12.97 -– 30.11.986
|
Cumulative
|
|
A. Coal-to-gas conversion:
- Cogeneration systems
- High efficiency boilers
- energy efficiency e.g. for new buildings
|
178 621,49
65 296,40
|
318 015,40
65 296,40
|
|
B. Contractual services
|
35 940,00
0,00
|
35 940,00
2 574,02
|
|
C. Technical assistance
- BOS management fee
- STAP fee
- Energy auditing services
- Financial auditing services
- Training and consulting services
|
54 877,06
6 672,45
16 787,53
22 000,00
133 945,43
|
172 910,06
50 136,97
25 176,53
22 000,00
235 060,73
|
- Short description of expenditures (goods, materials and civil works, contractual services, technical
assistance, concluded contracts, opened letters of credit - committed sources):
Under the "Coal-to-Gas Conversion" component, in reporting period 7 agreements on grant
allocation were signed for the initial amount 9,568,000.00 USD.
Under the "Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings" component, in reporting period 5
agreements on grant allocation were signed for the total initial amount 679,442.00 USD
Training of GEF Project Office employees on bookkeeping, which will completed till the end of this year,
was carried. Expenses on consulting mainly cover costs of Boiler Owner Representative (COWI), energy
auditor (NAPE) and experts - consultants of GEF Project Office. Moreover, the expenses refer to monitoring
- advance payment under the „Contract for contractual services for environmental monitoring of coal
fired boiler houses, small and medium size, subject to modernization under the AIJ/GEF Project".
Furthermore, the expenditures refer to services of independent financial auditor connected with financial
audit covering fiscal 1997 and consulting services for GEF Project Office. Result of audit was positive.
Report prepared by auditor (PricewaterhouseCoopers) was sent to the MoE and World Bank
The payments were made under investment component - „Coal to Gas conversion" - high efficiency
boilers. The payments refered to two following projects:
- in Rawa Mazowiecka - 79,322.36 USD;
-
in Elbl¹g - 99,299.13 USD.
A contract between MPEC and BOS concerning modernisation of the boiler house
in Cracow, at Œw. Jana street has been signed under the pilot project. A turn key bidding invitation
has been published.
H. 2) Technical difficulties:
Organisational and investment problems arose:
- Because of the still existing critical opinion on organization, quality and punctuality of work of
Boiler Owner Representative (COWI) the selection of a new consultant (Boiler Owner Representative) was
made, all offers were evaluated and negotiations of a contract are about to be carried out.
- Because of the absolute necessity to start to implement the Ostrow Wielkopolski. and Koszalin projects
and in connection with the duration of selection of a new consultant, it was agreed with the World Bank
that the Beneficiaries would charge Energoprojekt Katowice with the services of boiler owner
representative. The Agreements between Beneficiaries and Consultant are supervised by GEF Project Office.
- The agreement on AIJ/GEF grant allocation with MPEC W³oc³awek
was suspended.
- The conversion conception of AIJ/GEF project in Piekary Slaskie was revised in cooperation with Boiler
Owner Representative and the Beneficiary and the decision on the change of conversion technology was taken
(from CHP to HOB). This decision was accepted by STAP.
-
One agreement on allocation of AIJ/GEF grant for the stand-by project -
Warsaw University is being prepared by BOΠlocal branches. It is connected with the AIJ/GEF funds
available after suspension of AIJ/GEF grant agreement with MPEC Wloclawek and the reduction of
AIJ/GEF grant for the project in Piekary Slaskie.
- Agreement on allocation of AIJ/GEF grant under sub-component „Energy efficiency in new
residential buildings" signed with S.M. „JURA” in
Czêstochowa” was terminated because of the plans of starting the construction of the building in
the 1999, April-May.
an execution of the pilot project at the Polytechnic University in Cracow is under threat. It is impossible
to publish an invitation for a bid aimed at an investment realisation due to the insufficient financial
resources supplementary to the grants (the National Fund was unable to determine whether it could allocate
its financial resources to the project).
- preliminary valuation shows that providing small boiler houses (below 1.0 MW) with the grants is
uneconomical from the National Fund's effectiveness point of view (costs of servicing per each
individual project - e.g. hiring the boiler owner representative are higher than the granted amount).
Additionally, the complex and time-consuming procedure is troublesome to an investor who has to operate
with domestic inflation still running high, and grant's value is small. Due to this fact, 2
applications approved by STAP would probably not be effected.
- the complex and time- consuming procedure resulted in the resignation of prevailing part of the boiler
owners from GEF grant approved by STAP.
- modernisation of any boiler house is impossible in 1997 without an efficient reconciliation system of
the needed documents between the World Bank and the Polish partner and without taking into account the
specific of the Polish economy. The prompt selection of the firm which would carry out the environment
monitoring is also essential in order to conduct a modernisation of any boiler house in 1997.
H. 3) Negative impacts and/or effects encountered:
The same
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental negative impacts/effects?
|
no
|
|
Describe social/cultural negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social negative impacts/effects?
|
no
|
|
Describe economic negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic negative impacts/effects?
|
no
|
H. 4) Other obstacles encountered: n/a
H. 5) Other: n/a
Appendix I
Coal to Gas Conversion Component
Descriptions of 2212 iIndividual pProjects recommended by STAP and BOS and approved by Minister of MoE
for funding them from AIJ/GEF proceeds. Grant agreements have been signed for 22 projects, among which one
is commissioned (MPEC Krakow).
Updated 30th of November 1998
Project nr. 1
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
CHP at Polytechnic University of Cracow
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Cracow
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (after balancing of funds)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Cogeneration unit:
gas engines 2x1.2 MWe,
gas boilers 9.35 MWt with heat accumulator
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 60%
NF and VF - no confirmation
|
|
2. Project costs
|
5891 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
before turn-key bidding invitation
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
43.6 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
18 638 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 12
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB at Sw. Jana street in KCrakcow (pilot project)
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
KCrakcow
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
Realisation – 199797
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
1 condensing boiler 0.585 MWt
2 high efficiency boilers 2x0.4655 MWt;
total 1.5065 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF -– 4837%
Owner’s contribution (Oc) -– 5263%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
288 895394 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
139 394 USD – grant amount
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Project is commissioned turn-key bidding invitation has been published
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
28.49.3 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
3 4972551 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic
model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or
reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste
disposal or bunker fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity
what the minimum data requirements are.
e) Figures in brackets concern emission reduction including also end-users taken
over from other boiler houses.
f) Decision on conversion technology change was taken (cogeneration to gas
boilers); all data will be verified after preparation of conceptual design.
g) The project implementation was stopped, as the boiler owner has not accepted
conceptual design.
Project nr. 23
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
CHP in hospital in Piekary Slaskief)
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Piekary Slaskie
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Cogeneration unit:
gas engine 1.5 MWe, 1.5 MWt;
gas boiler 2.8 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 46%, Oc - 5%, VF - 24%, NF - 25%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
3 609 0003668 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Grant agreement
After initial settlement of the new work schedule with the boiler owner
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
27.19 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
10 782 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 34
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Boilers in two hospitals in Siemianowice Slaskie
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Siemianowice Slaskie
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
GasCondensing steam boilers 7.84 MWt (4x1.96 MWt)
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
The amounts were verified after preparation the conceptual design by the Boiler Owner
Representative (BOR)
GEF -– 5356%, Oc - 3219%, VF – 6%, NF -– 925%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
2 555 0002028 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
18 000 USD – consulting services of Boiler Owner Representative (BOR)
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
"turn key" contract
In the course of investment implementation
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
64.258.9 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
11 5498650 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 45
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in Raszyn Falenty IMUZ
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Raszyn Raszyn Falenty
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
19997 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
gas water boilers 2.8 MWt (2x1.4 MWt) (2x1.5 MWt)
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 4129%, OcC - 2116%, VF - 27%, NF -– 23%, VF – 15%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
542474 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
9 000 USD – consulting services of BOR
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
"turn key" contract
In the course of investment implementation
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
31.619.2 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
2 368 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 56
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in hospital in Piotrkow Trybunalski
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Piotrkow Trybunalski
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
19997 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas water boilers 4.82 MWt:
2x1.4 MWt = 2.8 MWt (water)
2x1.0 MWt = 2.0 MWt (steam)
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 574%, Oc - 6%, VF -–376%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
1 3571123 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
18 000 USD – consulting services of BOR
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
"turn key" contract
In the course of investment implementation
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
55.343.0 US/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
3 635 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 6
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
CHP MPEC in Wloclawekg)
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Wloclawek
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Cogeneration unit:
gas turbine 3.0 MWe, 6.0 MWt, gas boiler 15.0 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 43%, Oc - 22%, NF – 31%,
Communal budget - 4%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
3 978 000 USDg)
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
20 000 USD – consulting services of BOR
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Grant agreement
After the change of the conceptual design in agreement with STAPg)
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
4.6 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
62 019 tCO2/year
|
7
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in Wroclaw
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Wroclaw
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
gas boilers 2.87 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 47%, Oc - 27%, other - 26%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
705 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
34.1 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
1940 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 7
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB PEC in Poznan
Potworowskiego street
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Poznan
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas water boilers: 2x1.4 MWt = 2.8 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 45%, Oc – 55%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
421 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
"turn key" contract
In the course of investment implementation
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
25.9 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
1 881 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 89
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
CHP in Swiebodzice
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Swiebodzice
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
19998 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Cogeneration unit:
2 gas engines: 5.8 MWe, 6.8 MwtMWt,
2 gas boilers: 8.2 MW;
total: 15.0 MWt, 5.8 MWe
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF -– 606%, Oc – 40%other - 34%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
6 6588541 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
20 000 USD - consulting services of BOR
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Grant agreement
Before bid announcement
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
19.332.2 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
38 995 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 910
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in hospital in Ciechanow
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Ciechanow
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas boilers 7.64 MWt:
2x1.86 MWt = 3.72 MWt (water)
2x1.96 MWt = 3.92 MWt (steam)
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 597%, Oc – 21%, NF -– 203%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
1 01939 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
15 000 USD – consulting services of BOR
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
"turn key" contract
In the course of investment implementation
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
29.010.9 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
6 109 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 1011
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB PEC in Rawa Mazowiecka "Zamkowa Wola"
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Rawa Mazowiecka
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
gas water boilers
3x1.75 MWt = 5.25 MWt
gas condensing boilers
2x0.9 MWt = 1.8 MWt
Total capacity 7.05 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 542%, Oc - 2120%, NF – 25%other - 38%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
1 190 000978 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
15 000 USD – consulting services of BOR
79,322.36 USD – investment implementation
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
"turn key" contract
In the course of investment implementation
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
26.517.8 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
7 585 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic
model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or
reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste
disposal or bunker fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity
what the minimum data requirements are.
Project nr. 11
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB PEC in Leczyca
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Leczyca
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas water boilers: 3x1.75 MWt = 5.25 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 43%, Oc – 11%, VF – 46%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
574 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
15 000 USD – consulting services of BOR
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
"turn key" contract
In the course of investment implementation
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
13.8 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
4 431 tCO2/yeare)
|
Project nr. 12
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
CHP MPEC in Ostrow Wlkopolski
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Ostrow Wlkopolski
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Cogeneration unit:
Gas turbine 5.0 MWe, 8.8 MWt,
Additional afterburners 2.8 MWt,
Total: 11.6 MWt, 5.0 MWe
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 60%, Oc – 40%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
5 789 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Grant agreement
Before bid announcement
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
10.9 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
54 326 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 13
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB PEC in Rawa Mazowiecka "Solidarnosc"
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Rawa Mazowiecka
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas boilers 5.25 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 46%, Oc – 19%, NF – 35%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
951 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Grant agreement
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
21.9 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
6 472 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 14
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB PEC in Poznan Hetmanska Street
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Poznan
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas boilers 4.71 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 65%, Oc – 35%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
930 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Grant agreement
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
36.8 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
3 842 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 15
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in hospital in Elblag
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Elblag
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas steam boilers: 2x2.3 MWt = 4.6 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 57%, Oc – 7%, VF – 36%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
1 034 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
15 000 USD – consulting services of BOR
99,299.13 USD – investment implementation
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
"turn key" contract
In the course of investment implementation
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
29.5 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
4 319 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 16
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in hospital in Koszalin
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Koszalin
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas boilers 8.3 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 40%, Oc – 13%, NF – 47%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
867 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Grant agreement
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
12.1 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
3 063 (6 329) tCO2/yeare)
|
Project nr. 17
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in housing cooperative in Sopot
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Sopot
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas water boilers: 2x1.75 MWt = 3.5 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 38%, Oc – 62%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
336 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
15 000 USD – consulting services of BOR
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
"turn key" contract
In the course of investment implementation
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
15.9 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
1 794 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 18
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in Pruszcz Gdanski
Obroncow Pokoju Street
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Pruszcz Gdanski
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas boilers: 2x1.4 MWt = 2.8 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 59%, Oc – 41%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
447 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
15 000 USD – consulting services of BOR
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Before signing the "turn key" contract
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
21.6 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
3 537 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 19
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in Pruszcz Gdanski
Obroncow Wybrzeza Street
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Pruszcz Gdanski
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas boilers 1.7 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 38%, Oc – 62%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
231 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Grant agreement
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
23.1 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
283 (923) tCO2/yeare)
|
Project nr. 20
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB OPEC in Gdynia
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Gdynia
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas boilers: 2x0.55 MWt = 1.1 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 43%, Oc – 57%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
164 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
15 000 USD – consulting services of BOR
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
"turn key" contract
In the course of investment implementation
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
16.5 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
1 372 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 21
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB PEC in Wrzesnia
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Wrzesnia
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas boilers 2.6 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 42%, Oc – 39%, VF – 19%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
319 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Grant agreement
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
14.0 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
1 674 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 22
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
CHP in Gdansk - Matarnia
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Gdansk
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Cogeneration unit:
Gas turbine 5.0 MWe, 10.0 MWt,
Gas boilers 3.3 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 64%, Oc – 36%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
7 110 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Grant agreement
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
19.7 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
40 706 tCO2/year
|
Appendix II
Coal to Gas Conversion Component
Characteristics of 5 projects recommended by STAP for funding them from AIJ/GEF proceeds, accepted by
Minister of MoE yet, planning for the realisation as the stand-by projects
Updated 30th of November 1998
Project nr. 1
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in Wroclaw
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Wroclaw
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
gas boilers 2.87 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 50%, Oc - 24%, VF – 26%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
744 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Approved for realisation,
The property right is not clear what makes impossible to sign a grant agreement , now stand-by
project
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
38.1 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
1 940 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 2
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in Janow Lubelski
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Janow Lubelski
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas boilers 5.25 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 24%, other – 76%,
(the lack of secured counterpart financing)
|
|
2. Project costs
|
1 120 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Approved by:
STAP on 17 January 1997
MoE 10 January 1998
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
13.2 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
4 835 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 33
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in Warsaw University
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Warsaw
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas boilers 3.4 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 26%, Oc – 74%,
|
|
2. Project costs
|
423 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
The grant agreement is prepared for signing;
Approved by:
STAP on 16 January 1997
MoE 10 January 1998
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
14.5 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
2 861 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 424
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in Ladek Zdroj
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Ladek Zdroj
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
3 gas boilers: 3.5 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 40%, Oc – 60%,
|
|
2. Project costs
|
501 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Approved by:
STAP on 22 November 1997
MoE 10 January 1998
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
21.1 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
2 365 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 526
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in hospital in Jaroslaw
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Jaroslaw
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1999 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Gas boilers 3.3 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 65%, Oc – 35%
(not enough supplied documentary evidence)
|
|
2. Project costs
|
448 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Approved by:
STAP on 22 November 1997
MoE 10 January 1998
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
16.5 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
4 569 tCO2/year
|
Appendix III
Energy Efficiency Component
Characteristics of 9 projects for which the energy audits were conducted and the agreements on grant
allocation were signed
Updated 30th of November 1998
Project nr. 1
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Building "62" - Kontkiewicza 62 street, Housing estate: Wyczerpy, Czestochowa
Co-operative JURA in Czestochowa
Multi family buildingBuilding space: 3055.7 m2Number of flats 49
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Energy Efficiency
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Czestochowa
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1996
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
June 30, 1997
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
50 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
1. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.17 W/(m2K) – additionally
enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 12 cm;
2. Improvement of the basement floor's insulation level to U=0.27 W/(m2K) –
additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 9cm;
3. Window's installation - heat-transfer coefficient of U=1.5 W/(m2K);
4. Application of mechanical ventilation;
5. Installation of heat recovery unit – capacity 91%;
6. Foamed polystyrene moulder "Thermomur" – extra charge over the required
standard;
7. Installation of gas- oil boiler house above the cost of installation of boiler house with
capacity of 90%.
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 5.5%, Own means – 94.5%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
1 187 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
Energy Auditor veryfied all documents connected with the procurement of energy efficiency measures,
submitted by the developer and established the final AIJ/GEF grant amount at 65,296.4 USD.
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
The building is completed and commissioned. The final grant amount was calculated by Energy and
reimbursed to the Developer Auditor. Monitoring report is being prepared by Energy Auditor.
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
130.0 USD/tCO2
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
61 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 2
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Building "C" – Kontkiewicza street, Housing estate: Wyczerpy, Czestochowa
Co-operative JURA in Czestochowa
Multi family buildingBuilding space: 1541.6 m2Number of flats 24
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Energy Efficiency
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Czestochowa
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
15 April 1997
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
30 November 1998
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
50 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
1. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.17 W/(m2K) – additionally
enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 12 cm;
2. Improvement of the basement floor's insulation level to U=0.27 W/(m2K) –
additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 9cm;
3. Window's installation - heat-transfer coefficient of U=1.5 W/(m2K);
4. Application of mechanical ventilation;
5. Installation of heat recovery unit - capacity 91%;
6. Foamed polystyrene moulder "Thermomur" – extra charge over the required
standard.
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 6% USD, Own means – 94%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
495 700 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
All energy efficiency measures were procured.
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Last internal finishing and installation works.
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
120.0 USD/tCO2
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
31 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 3
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Building "B" – Kontkiewicza street, Housing estate: Wyczerpy,
CzestochowaCo-operative JURA in Czestochowa
Multi family buildingBuilding space: 1541.6 m2
Number of flats 24
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Energy Efficiency
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Czestochowa
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
2 April 1997
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
30 December 1998
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
50 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
1. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.17 W/(m2K) – additionally
enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 12 cm;2. Improvement of the basement floor's
insulation level to U=0.27 W/(m2K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation
with a thickness of 9cm;
3. Window's installation - heat-transfer coefficient of U=1.5 W/(m2K);
4. Application of mechanical ventilation;
5. Installation of heat recovery unit - capacity 91%,
6. Foamed polystyrene moulder "Thermomur" – extra charge over the required
standard;
7. Solar collectors assembled at building no 62.
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 6%, Own means – 94%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
574 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
All energy efficiency measures were procured;
The installation of mechanical ventilation is to be completed in 7 apartments.
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Last internal finishing and installation works
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
98.0 USD/tCO2
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
30 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 4
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Housing Estate "ZIELONKI" composed of 21 single family buildings, built as 5 range
buildings
"ACCORD" Krakow
Single family buildings constructed in "Canadian Technology":
Number of single family buildings 21
Total buildings space 2413.65 m2
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Energy Efficiency
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Krakow
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
September 1998
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
50 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
1. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.34, 0.39, 0.44 W/(m2K) by extra
packing of insulation material;
2. Improvement of the roof insulation level to U=0.15 W/(m2K) - additionally enlargement
of an insulation;
3. Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.1W/(m2K);
4. Installation of fixed external window shutters but only in 5 single family buildings.
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 4%, Own means – 96%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
818 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
All energy efficiency measures are procured.
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Project is completed,
Energy auditor calculates the Grant amount connected with each building.
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
26.0-30.0 USD/tCO2
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
33 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 5
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Housing Estate in Wilanow (Jara and Bruzdowa streets) composed of 41 single family buildings, built
as 6 range buildings
"Housing Cooperative "Inicjatywa Ekologiczna" in Warsaw
Single family buildings:
Number of single family buildings 41
Total buildings space 7341.2 m2
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Energy Efficiency
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Warsaw
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
July 1998
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
September 1999
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
50 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
1. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.32, 0.37, 0.42 W/(m2K);
2. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.14 W/(m2K);
3. Improvement of floor's insulation level to R=2.60 (m2K)/W;
4. Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.1 W/(m2K);
5. Application of mechanical ventilation with heat recovery unit - capacity 91%;
6. Sun collectors and warm tank;
7. Iron insered piece capable for the fireplace with water jacket.
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 9.3%, Own means – 90.7%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
3 387 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Preparation works have been done:
The building site is enclosed, the temporary roads have been built, power substation and water
intake are ready, the humus layer was removed and protected.
Part of excavations (foundations) have been done.
The contracts on construction are signed with two contractors.
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
37.0-42.0 USD/tCO2
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
289 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 6
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Housing Estate "KOWALE B" composed of 23 multifamily buildings
Towarzystwo Inwestycyjne "INVESTING" SA
Gdansk
23 multi family buildings:
Number of flats 183,
Total buildings space 11 097.94 m2
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Energy Efficiency
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Gdansk
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
March 1999
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
50 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
1. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.37, 0.47, 0.42 W/(m2K);
2. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.23 W/(m2K);
3. Improvement of floor's insulation level to R=2.82 (m2K)/W;
4 Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.6 W/(m2K);
5. Application of mechanical ventilation and heat recovery unit;
6. Programme temperature controller.
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 8%, Own means – 92%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
3 651 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
All energy efficiency measures have been procured.
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
The buildings are in different status of construction:
3 buildings - the internal finishing works and external finishing works (wodden balconies) are
conducted,
1 building is in a raw state (opened).
The rest 19 buildings are in an intermediate state.
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
96.0-114.0 USD/tCO2
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
248 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 7
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Housing Estate in Myslowice close to Katowice, composed of 19 single family buildings
OIKOS Sp. z o.o., Katowice
Single family buildings:
Number of single family buildings 19
Total buildings space 4836 m2
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Energy Efficiency
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Myslowice close to Katowice
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
15 June 1999
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
50 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
1. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.31, 0.36, 0.41 W/(m2K) by extra
packing of insulation material;
2. Improvement of the roof insulation level to U=0.24 W/(m2K) – additionally
enlargement of an insulation;
3. Improvement of floor's insulation level to R=2.60 (m2K)/W;
4. Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.5W/(m2K).
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 1.9%, Own means – 98.1%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
1 730 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
All energy efficiency measures are procedured
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
The status of construction is following:
1building- almost completed, the only external walls are to be painted;
6 buildings – internal , finishing works are carried out;
5 - buildings - are in raw, closed state, the installation works (electric and water, sewage) are
conducted;
6 buildings - are in raw, opened state, the roof works are conducted;
1 building - ceiling above the first condignation is completed.
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
77.0-79.0 USD/tCO2
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
37 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 8
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Multi family building
Berenta/Micinskiego street,
Wroclaw
ARCHICOM Sp. z o.o.
Multi family building:
Building space: 6051.17 m2;
Number of flats 65.
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Energy Efficiency
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Wroclaw
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
15 June 1999
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
50 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
1. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.22 W/(m2K);
2. Improvement of the garden floor's insulation level to U=0.22 W/(m2K) –
additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 9cm;
3. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.52, 0.57, 0.62 W/(m2K);
4. Window's installation – heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.1 W/(m2K);
5. Heaters with small water capacity.
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 1%, Own means – 99%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
3 118 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
All energy efficiency measures are procured,
Almost all measures are installed, with the exception of 30 heaters
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
Last installation works are being conducted such as installation of water-sewage facilities,
Works to be done:
Glaze finishing,
Terracotta finishing,
Elevation and balustrades of balconies and terraces,
Garden and other works connected with completing of the building.
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
32.0 USD/tCO2
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
26 tCO2/year
|
Project nr. 9
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Single Family buildings built as 3 double-flat buildings by Housing Cooperative
"Przylesie" in Koszalin;
6 single-family buildings built as 3 buildings with 2 apartments each;
Total buildings space 1027.8 m2.
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Energy Efficiency
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Koszalin
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
September 1999
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
50 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
1. Improvement of the walls insulation level;
2. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.22 W/(m2K);
3. Improvement of floor's insulation level;
4. Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U= 1.6 W/(m2K).
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF – 1.2%, Own means – 98.8%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
696 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
None
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
2 buildings - ceiling above the second condignation is completed;
4 buildings – walls of the second condignatioans are completed.
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
32.0 USD/tCO2
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
11 tCO2/year
|
