Uniform Reporting Format:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
List of
Projects
A. Description of project
A. 1) Title of project:
SUTSAINABLE HEAT AND POWER FOR PUBLIC NETWORKS IN POLAND
A. 2) Participants/actors:
Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item
"Function within activity".
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation(a):
|
EDON International B.V.
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
EDON International B.V.
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
EDON
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
EDON
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Consultant
|
|
Street:
|
Dr. Van Deenweg 136
|
|
Post code:
|
P.O. Box 519
|
|
City:
|
8000 AM Zwolle
|
|
Country:
|
The Netherlands
|
|
Telephone:
|
+ 31 38 852 49 36
|
|
Fax:
|
+ 31 38 852 41 66
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Van de Ven
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Jan-Willem
|
|
Job title:
|
Project officer
|
|
Direct tel.:
|
+ 31 38 455 49 36
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+ 31 38 455 41 66
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
100733.3021@compuserve.com
|
a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations,
etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government
agency closely following the activity.
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation(a):
|
Energetyka Poznanska S.A.
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Energetyka Poznanska S.A
|
|
Department:
|
Development Department
|
|
Acronym:
|
EP S.A.
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
EP S.A.
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Local Partner
|
|
Street:
|
F. Nowowiejskiego 11
|
|
Post code:
|
60-967
|
|
City:
|
Poznan
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 61) 856 13 02
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 61) 856 11 17
|
|
E-mail:
|
epsa@epsa.com.pl
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.epsa.com.pl
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Andruszkiewicz
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Jerzy
|
|
Job title:
|
Development Director
|
|
Direct tel.:
|
(+48 61) 856 13 02
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 61) 856 11 17
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Jerzy.andruszkiewicz@epsa.pl
|
a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations,
etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government
agency closely following the activity.
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation(a):
|
Cogen Spolka z.o.o.
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Cogen Spolka z.o.o.
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
Cogen
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
Cogen
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Local project management; measurements and energy audits; engineering
|
|
Street:
|
F. Nowowiejskiego 11
|
|
Post code:
|
60-967
|
|
City:
|
Poznan
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 61) 856 13 02
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 61) 856 11 17
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Gronski
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Mariusz
|
|
Job title:
|
Advisor
|
|
Direct tel.:
|
(+48 61) 856 13 02
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 61) 856 11 17
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Mariusz.gronski@epsa.pl
|
a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations,
etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government
agency closely following the activity.
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation(a):
|
Urzad Miasta i Gminy Szamotuly
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Szamotuly Municipality
|
|
Department:
|
Development Department
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Realisation of modernisation programme
|
|
Street:
|
Dworcowa 26
|
|
Post code:
|
64-500
|
|
City:
|
Szamotuly
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 61) 29 20 631
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 61) 29 20 072
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Stanke
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Janusz
|
|
Job title:
|
Head of Investment Department and Municipal Management
|
|
Direct tel.:
|
(+48 61) 29 20 631
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 61) 29 20 072
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations,
etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government
agency closely following the activity.
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation(a):
|
Narodowy Fundusz Ochrony Srodowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej, Sekretariat-JI
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
National Found for Environmental Protection and Water Management, JI-Secretariat
|
|
Department:
|
International Department
|
|
Acronym:
|
NFOSiGW
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
NFEP&WM
|
|
Function within activity:
|
National Focal Point, Reporting agency
|
|
Street:
|
Konstruktorska 3A
|
|
Post code:
|
02-673
|
|
City:
|
Warsaw
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 22) 849 22 80; 849 00 80
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 22) 849 20 98
|
|
E-mail:
|
Jolantak@@nfosigw.gov.pl
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.mfosigw.gov.pl
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mrs. Galon-Kozakiewicz, Ph.D.
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Jolanta
|
|
Job title:
|
Head of JI-Secretariat
|
|
Direct tel.:
|
(+48 22) 849 22 80; 849 00 80 ext. 504
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 22) 849 20 98
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Jolantak@@nfosigw.gov.pl
|
Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved
in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely
following the activity.
A. 3) Activity:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
The project concerns energy efficiency in heat production by fuel switching. Gasification of a
boiler house in combination with co-generation is demonstrated in Szamotuly. The cogenerator will
be donated by the Netherlands government to support the introduction of these environmentally more
friendly cogenerators and to support the transfer of technology. The donation is also needed at
this stage in the Polish energy market development since this pilot project is not commercially
viable yet. The heat produced by the cogenerator will be used for the supply of hot water to the
end-users. The electricity will be delivered to the grid, owned by EP. In addition to this,
environmental measurements concerning the reduction of the emissions of greenhouse gasses and other
environmental aspects, will be executed during this project.
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Energy efficiency heat production; fuel switching; co-generation
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region,
state):
|
Municipality of Szamotuly in the Poznan region in Poland
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
01-01-1998
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
31-12-1999
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed.
Gasification of a boiler house and heat supply network were completed by October 1998. Remaining
cogeneration unit and necessary automatic equipment are expected from Netherlands side soon.
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
15 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
The following equipment is assumed:
· Co-generation unit Zantec 230 HR,
· Two gas boilers with their heat capacity 1100 kW each,
· Heat accumulator with capacity 3,7 MW
The co-generation unit will work in the peak base load with the annual consumption of the installed
capacity circa 6500 h/a, whereas the rest of the demand will be met by gas-fired heaters. The CHP
plant will be fired by gas GZ-50 with heat of combustion Qc= 39 549 kJ/m3.
|
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
A. 4) Cost (to the extent possible):
|
Item
|
Year 1
1998
|
Year 2
1999
|
...
|
Year X
2012
|
|
Cost of the project in US$:
|
465 000
|
|
|
|
|
AIJ component in US$:
|
236 000
|
|
|
|
|
US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:
|
30
|
|
|
|
The investment costs appear only in first year of the project, as a project foresees full modernisation of
boiler house.
The total budget foreseen for the project is US$ 724 000. The difference between total cost of project and
expenses in first year (1998) is US$ 259 000. This amount is sacrificed to all kind of environment
monitoring, training, marketing and promotion activity, travelling and other. As a cost of project it is
understood only investment costs. The AIJ factor is qualified as investment costs covered by Dutch
government.
Describe briefly how costs are determined:
The cost effectiveness of the project (in US$ per avoided ton CO2 equivalent) is calculated according to
the methodology used in the Dutch national CO2-reduction plan (annuity write of over the lifetime of the
project, with an interest rate of 5 % divided by the amount of reduction per year).
A. 5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organisations involveda):
|
|
- NFEP&WM, Sekretariat-JI: overall responsibility for review of JI projects, co-ordination and
communication to the UNFCCC Secretariat, Polish Ministry of Environmental Protection Natural
Resources and Forestry (MEPNR&F) and foreign donors on matters relating to JI activities in
Poland;
- EDON: Project manager; supplier of technology; engineering; financing;
- Cogen: Local project management; measurements and energy audits; engineering;
- EP: Human resources; buying electricity;
- DHC/Municipality of Szamotuly: buying heat; human resources; land and buildings.
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organisations mentioned is reported
under
section A.2 above.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance,
approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be
shown as follows:
(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one
participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached
letters issued by the relevant national authorities;
(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national
authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been
received from all participating Parties.
B. 1) For the activity:
* First report and joint reporting: please add copies of letters of endorsement by each designated national
authority of Parties involved in the activity.
* Subsequent reports:
Activity was: o suspended
o terminated earlier
Describe:
B. 2) This report is a joint report:
Yes, forward copy of agreement/endorsement by the designated national authorities involved
No
B. 3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio-economic and
environment priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of
national economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies
|
|
Poland seeks energy security through stable energy deliveries at socially acceptable prices and
with a minimal damage to the environment. Among the priority actions are to diversify the primary
energy supplies and to comply with international environmental agreements to reduce air pollution
and greenhouse gas emissions. This project is designed to be fully-integrated and consistent with
the goals and development strategies of the government of Poland.
AIR PROTECTION
This is based on:
· the "Implementation Program of the National Environmental Policy till the year to
2000",
· voivodeship lists of priority projects regarding environmental protection for 1998,
The aim of the undertakings concerning the air pollution control is to achieve reductions of
pollutant emissions into the atmospheric air by both improving the fuel quality parameters and
replacing fuel, by installing equipment that reduces the flue gas emissions of pollutants, by
modernising and replacing technologies and by conserving energy.
A. Directions:
1. Support for the undertakings leading to reductions of the emissions into the atmospheric air of
gas and particulate pollutants, by means of the modernisation and upgrading of the fuel production
and burning technologies.
2. Support for the undertakings related to the rationalisation of heat systems, including the
recovery of heat, national production of highly efficient heating equipment, combined with the use
of unconventional energy sources.
B. Programmes:
1. National Programme for Reduction of Sulphur Dioxide Emissions.
2. Programme to eliminate low emissions.
3. Programme to reduce nitric oxide emissions.
4. Reduction of the exhaust gas emissions from the means of public transport, particularly in large
urban-industrial agglomerations.
5. Programme for the use of alternative sources of energy.
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
- Emission reduction of CO2, SO2 and NOx;
- Reduction of noise level.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
Yes, see E 2.1
|
|
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:
|
- Better quality of heat and domestic hot water delivery;
- Cleaner laundry;
- More aesthetic appearance of boiler house.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?
|
No
|
|
Describe economic benefits in detail:
|
Business development and transfer of technology to the Joint-Venture Cogen.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?
|
No
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real,
measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not
have occurred in the absence of such activities
E. 1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:
BASELINE STUDY ABSTRACT
The objective of the baseline study was to examine the situation within the range concerning the emission
of greenhouse gases and other pollutants which prevails before the pilot project is going to be realised.
The pilot project consists in replacing two existing coal-fired boiler houses with one gas-fired CHP plant
with a co-generation unit. The analysis was carried out by means of a method based on calculations of the
volume of emission resulting from the conditions of operating sources which is heat load, fuel used and the
quality of fuel.
Furthermore, taking into consideration the same parameters for heat base load, the calculations for the
volume of greenhouse gases emission and other pollutants were carried out for the time once the project is
implemented.
Those calculations allowed to estimate the quantity of the reduction of greenhouse gases and other
pollutants as the result of activities undertaken in the connection with the pilot project.
THE ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANTS EMISSION FROM OLD BOILER HOUSES
The planned investment venture was going to cover the area which was served by two sources:
Boiler house no. 817 located in M.C. Sklodowskiej 1,
Boiler house no. 824 located in Wisniowa Street.
The maximum demand for heat generated in these two sources was:
for the needs of central heating 2,014 MW
for the needs of hot water 0,473 MW
General characteristics of the fuel
The heaters in both boiler houses were fired by the mixture of hard coal, class 31/05/04 size grade II and
fine coal M-IIa (class 23/18/06) in the ratio 4:1. On the basis of date included in the invoices issued by
the fuel supplier in 1997, the average technological parameters are as follows:
hard coal, class 31/05/04 size grade II
net calorific value Qw = 31 314 kJ/kg,
coal content Cr = 78,30 %,
ash content Ar = 3,64 %,
moisture content Wr = 4,27 %,
sulphur content Sr = 0,34 %,
fine coal M-IIa (class 23/18/06)
net calorific value Qw = 24 331 kJ/kg,
coal content Cr = 64,33 %,
ash content Ar = 16,30 %,
moisture content Wr = 9,00 %,
sulphur content Sr = 0,55 %,
The characteristics of the operation of the boiler houses in 1996 and 1997
On the basis of the data provided by Local Heating Company in Szamotuly some of the parameters were
estimated, namely: the volume of heat generation, the monthly average heat power of the boiler houses, fuel
consumption, separately for hard coal and fine coal for years 1996 and 1997. As it seems from the results,
the average efficiency for both boiler houses was 50-53 % so there is a considerable discrepancy with their
nominal efficiency.
The methodology of calculating the volume of the pollutants’ emission
Typical environmental pollutants emitted by coal-fired boiler houses are basically present in the
combustion gas: non-toxic dust, carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide, sulphur dioxide and nitric oxide.
The emission of dust
The quantity of dust depends on the fuel quality (the content of ash, sinterability etc.), the construction
features of a heater (the kind of grate, the system of channels) and the method of a heater’s
maintenance. The volume of dust produced during the process of burning is stated in percentage of ash
content which together with fuel goes to the grate, accounts for U= 10-20%. The reduction in the volume
takes place in the cyclone dust collectors or sedimentation chambers.
The emission of dust once the dust collector is passed is calculated on the basis of the following
relationship:
Gpe = B * Ar *U *(1-h ) [kg]
Where: B- the volume of burnt fuel [kg]
Ar - the content of ash in fuel [kg/kg]
U – the volume of dust carried by the combustion gas
h - the efficiency of dust collecting
In the calculations of the volume of dust emission in boiler houses in Szamotuly it was assumed that the
ash content in fuel is the average content of ash in particular months in the case of thick coal
(Ar = 3,64 %) and fine coal (Ar = 16,30 %). It was assumed that the volume of dust
carried with the combustion gas is U=15% for natural sequence (a boiler house no. 817) and U = 20% for an
induced sequence (a boiler house no. 824) and the efficiency of the dust collectors is respectively:
For a boiler house no. 817 (M.C. Sklodowskiej) with sedimentation chambers - h = 30%
For a boiker house no. 824 (Wisniowa) with cyclones - h = 75%.
The emission of SO2
While calculating the figures for the emission of sulphur dioxide it was assumed that in the case of coal
burning 80% of sulphur in fuel is carried away together with combustion gases into the atmosphere and 20 %
is in ash and slag. The emission of SO2 was calculated on the following basis:
GSO2 = 1.6 * B * Sr [kg]
Where: B- the quantity of burnt fuel
Sr- the content of sulphur in fuel [kg/kg}
The ratio1.6 can be explained by the fact that 90% of sulphur is carried by combustion gases as
SO2 and that proportions of constituting this compound are as following:
32 kg S + 32 kg O2 = 64 kg SO2.
The emission of CO2 and CO
The emission of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide depend primarily on the content of element of carbon C
[kg/kg} in fuel. However the volume and relations between these compounds are determined by the quality of
the very process of burning, and particularly by the quantity of losses in non-complete burning
Sp and losses in non-complete burning of SCO.
The first loss will decide upon the volume of element carbon Cr will be burnt to CO2
i CO. The loss can be describe by the following relation:
Sp = Cp*33 900 / Qw
Where: Cp – the volume of non-burnt element carbon [kg/kg]
33 900 – the calorific value of burning element carbon [kJ/kg]
Qw – net calorific value of fuel [kJ/kg]
Therefore the volume of burnt element carbon is:
C – Cp = C*(1 – Sp * Qw / 33 900) [kg/kg].
The loss in non-complete burning will decide upon the quantitative relation CO2 to CO. That loss
can be described by the following relation:
SCO = 25 000 / Qw * [CO] / ([CO]+[CO2])
Where: 25 000 - the calorific value of burning combustion gases
[CO] – the content of CO in combustion gases {m3/ m3 )
[CO2] – the content of CO2 in combustion gases {m3/ m3 )
From that relation it seems that element carbon which is burnt to CO2 is:
CCO2 = C*(1 – Sp * Qw / 33 900) * (1 – SCO*
Qw / 25 000) [kg/kg],
Whereas the volume of element carbon burnt to CO is:
CCO = C*(1 – Sp * Qw / 33 900) * SCO* Qw / 25
000 [kg/kg].
Taking into account mass relations in the process of burning carbon C, then according to the following
equations:
12 kg C + 32 kg O2 = 44 kg CO2,
12 kg C + 16 kg O2 = 28 kg CO,
The emission of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide while burning B [kg} of fuel can be taken from the
following relations:
GCO2 = B * 44 / 12 * C*(1 – Sp * Qw / 33 900) * (1 –
SCO* Qw / 25 000) [kg],
GCO = B * 28 / 12 * = C*(1 – Sp * Qw / 33 900) * SCO*
Qw / 25 000 [kg].
These formula were used while calculating the volume of emission of carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide in
the analysed coal-fired boiler houses in Szamotuly assuming that in the case of stable grate the loss in
non-complete burning of Sp = 6% (for natural sequence – a boiler house no. 817) and
Sp = 8% (for induced sequence – a boiler house no. 824) whereas the loss in non-complete
burning of SCO = 2.5 % for both boiler houses.
The emission of NO2
The emission of NO2 was calculated using the indicator of the load of NO2 determined
experimentally for coal-fired heaters with a stable grate (advised by the Ministry of Environmental
Protection Natural Resources and Forestry (MEPNR&F)):
For heaters with natural flow w = 1 kg/Mg,
for heaters with induced flow w = 1.5 kg/Mg
The emission of NO2 was calculated on the basis on the following relation:
GNO2 = B * w [kg].
The volume of emission determined for coal-fired boiler houses in Szamotuly
Using the methodology of determining the emission of pollutants into the atmosphere presented above and
operating parameters of boiler houses, the calculations were carried out for the volume of dust emission,
emission of SO2, CO2, CO and NO2 in the subsequent months of 1997
separately for a boiler house no. 817 (Sklodowska) and for a boiler house no. 824 (Wisniowa). In the
calculations the average data characterising the consumed fuel were used.
THE POLLUTANTS EMISSION FROM SYSTEM POWER PLANTS GENERATING ELECTRICITY BEING THE EQUIVALENT OF THE
ELECTRICITY GENERATED BY THE PLANNED CHP PLANT
Electricity which is to be generated in the planned CHP plant in Szamotuly would be otherwise produced in
system power plants. It would be then connected with the emission of pollutants into the atmosphere. The
evaluation of the volume of such pollutant emission is the result of the conditions which Polish power
plants work. The complete data allowing for determining the emission indicators were gathered in 1994:
The annual production of CHP plants in Poland was 112 352 GWh,
The annual coal consumption in those CHP plants was 95 374 000 Mg
with the average calorific value 12 477 kJ/kg
The chemical energy consumption in those CHP plants was 1 189 981 300 GJ
The average generating efficiency 34 %
The emission of dust
The average content of dust in burnt coal in CHP plants accounted for Ar = 15,4 %. The indicator
of dust emission was 0,176 kg/GJ which annually is 209 437 Mg. Taking into account the annual electricity
generation – the indicator of dust emission per electricity unit was:
1,864 kg/MWh
The emission of SO2
The average content of sulphur in burnt coal in CHP plants accounted for Sr = 0,71 %.. The
indicator of SO2 emission was 1 156 908 Mg. Taking into account the annual electricity
generation – the indicator of SO2 emission per electricity unit was:
10,30 kg/MWh
The emission of CO2
According to Grubba the unit CO2 emission accounts for:
For hard coal 98,27 kg/GJ
For fine coal 94,60 kg/GJ
In Polish conditions, taking into account the relation between the hard coal consumption and lignite
consumption, the unit emission from CHP plants was 95,80 kg/GJ. The annual value of CO2 emission
for such an indicator was 114 000 200 Mg. Taking into account the annual electricity generation – the
indicator of CO2 emission per electricity unit was:
1,01467 Mg/MWh
The emission of CO
The unit emission of CO for large heaters according to MEPNR&F is 5 kg/Mg.
The annual value of the CO emission for such an indicator is 476 875 Mg. Taking into account the annual
electricity generation – the indicator of CO emission per electricity unit was:
4,24 kg/MWh
The emission of NO2
The unit emission of NO2 for large heaters according to the MEPNR&F is 4 kg/Mg. The annual
value of the NO2 emission for such an indicator is 381 500 Mg. Taking into account the annual
electricity generation – the indicator of NO2 emission per electricity unit was:
3,4 kg/MWh
For the value of generated electricity 1664 MWh which can be generated in the planned CHP plant the value
of annual pollutant emission in CHP power plants is:
dust 1664 MWh * 1,864 kg/MWh = 3 102 kg
SO2 1664 MWh * 10,30 kg/MWh = 17 139 kg
CO2 1664 MWh * 1,01467 Mg/MWh = 1 688,4 Mg
CO 1664 MWh * 4,24 kg/MWh = 7 055 kg
NO2 1664 MWh * 3,40 kg/MWh = 5 658 kg
THE COMPARISON OF THE POLLUTANT EMISSION FROM THE PLANNED CHP PLANT WITH THE EXISTING BOILER HOUSES IN
SZAMOTULY
The figures for the volume of pollutant emission from existing coal-fired boiler houses calculated above
and the figures connected with the generation of 1664 MWh of electricity in CHP plants, allow for the
calculating the total value of pollutant emission before the implementation of the project. Those figures
are compared against the figures for the existing situation. They are all presented in the table E 2.1.
E. 2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:
Technical description of a planned CHP plant
The heat demand for the planned source in the local heating system in the area along M.C. Sklodowskiej in
Szamotuly which is to replace two existing coal-fired boiler houses no. 817 and no. 824 includes both heat
for local heating system as well as hot water and can be presented in the following figures:
heat (co) (external temp. 18oC 2014 kW,
hot water (cwu) 473 kW
Total 2487 kW.
The following equipment is assumed to meet the above demand:
Co-generation unit Zantec 230 HR,
Two gas heaters with their heat capacity 1100 kW each,
Heat accumulator with capacity 3,7 MW
The co-generation unit will work in the peak base load with the annual consumption of the installed
capacity circa 6500 h/a, whereas the rest of the demand will be met by gas-fired heaters. The CHP plant
will be –fired by gas GZ-50 with heat of combustion Qc= 39 549 kJ/m3
The characteristics of burnt fuel
Generating equipment in the CHP plant will be fired by gas GZ-50. On the basis of data sent by Local Gas
Company in Poznan, the average technological parameters of this fuel in 1997 were the following:
Heat of combustion Qc = 39 549 kJ/m3
Net calorific value Qw = 35 670 kJ/m3,
Content of CH4 = 96,0886 %
Content of C2H6 = 1,3004 %
Content of C3H8 = 0,2392 %
Content of C4H10 = 0,0552 %
Content of C5H12 = ,0152 %
Content of C6H14 = 0,0142 %
Content of N2 = 2,2514 %
Content of CO2 = 0,0285 %.
The characteristics of CHP plant operation
In order to compare the work of planned CHP plant with the work of two existing boiler houses the
calculations of energy generation were carried out with the assumption of heat demand from 1997. The volume
of heat and electricity generation and the consumption of fuel was calculated. The assumed energy
efficiency was 85%.
The methodology of calculating the volume of polluting substances
Typical pollutants emitted by gas-fired plants are present in combustion gas: carbon dioxide and carbon
monoxide, sulphur dioxide and nitric oxide.
The emission of SO2
There will be no emission of SO2 in the case of burning gas GZ-50 with its content given above,
because in the composition of this fuel there are not any sulphur compounds present.
The emission of CO2
The emission of CO2 depends on the content of carbon C in fuel. The determinants will be
hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide in gas GZ-50 presented above. Because the carbon dioxide present in the
combustion gas is the co-product of carbon dioxide being the result of exothermic processes of hydrocarbons
burning and pure carbon dioxide present in fuel, therefor the volume of emitted CO2 can be
calculated from the following relation:
GCO2 = B * (CH4 + 2*C2H6 + 3*C3H8
+4*C4H10 +5*C5H12 +6*C6H14 +
CO2 )*44 / 22,42/100
Where B; the volume of burnt gas fuel [m3]
CH4 , C2H6 , C3H8 , C4H10 ,
C5H12 , C6H14 , CO2 the volume share in fuel [%]
For the fuel composition given above this dependence can be presented as follows:
GCO2 = B * 1,958952 [kg].
The emission of CO
The emission of CO was calculated using the indicator of the load of CO determined experimentally for the
equipment fired by gas GZ-50 with the heat efficiency < 1,4 MWt (suggested by MEPNR&F):
w = 360 kg/106m3
The emission of CO was calculated from the following relation:
GCO = B * w [kg].
The emission of NO2
The emission of NO2 was calculated using the indicator of the load of NO2 determined
experimentally for the equipment fired by gas GZ-50 with the heat efficiency < 1,4 MWt
(suggested by MEPNR&F):
w = 1280 kg/106m3
The emission of NO2 was calculated from the following relation:
GNO2 = B * w [kg].
The volume of the emission calculated for the planned CHP plant in Szamatuly
Using the methodology for the determination of the emission of polluting substances into the atmosphere,
presented above and the operating parameters of the planned CHP plant in Szamotuly, the volume of
CO2, CO and NO2 emission was calculated for the subsequent months of a year. The
figures of this volume are presented in the table E 2.1.
Fill in the following tables as applicable:
E.2.1) Summary table: Projected emission reductions:
|
GHG
|
1999
|
2000
|
...
|
2013
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2 [Mg]
|
4857
|
4857
|
|
4857
|
|
N2O [kg]
|
7156
|
7156
|
|
7156
|
|
SO2 [kg]
|
25021
|
25021
|
|
25021
|
|
CO [kg]
|
68688
|
68688
|
|
68688
|
|
Dust [kg]
|
9880
|
9880
|
|
9880
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2 [Mg]
|
1620
|
1620
|
|
1620
|
|
N2O [kg]
|
1059
|
1059
|
|
1059
|
|
SO2 [kg]
|
0
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
CO [kg]
|
298
|
298
|
|
298
|
|
Dust [kg]
|
0
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2 [Mg]
|
3237
|
3237
|
|
3237
|
|
N2O [kg]
|
6097
|
6097
|
|
6097
|
|
SO2 [kg]
|
25021
|
25021
|
|
25021
|
|
CO [kg]
|
68390
|
68390
|
|
68390
|
|
Dust [kg]
|
9880
|
9880
|
|
9880
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2 [Mg]
|
3237
|
6474
|
|
48555
|
|
N2O [kg]
|
6097
|
12194
|
|
91455
|
|
SO2 [kg]
|
25021
|
50042
|
|
375315
|
|
CO [kg]
|
68390
|
136780
|
|
1025850
|
|
Dust [kg]
|
9880
|
19760
|
|
148200
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakage’s.
F. Bearing in mind that the financing of activities implemented jointly shall be additional to financial
obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial
mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows, please indicate
|
Source of project funding
Including pre-feasibility phase
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(US dollars)
|
|
Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (PSO-JI)
|
446 000 (910 000 NLG)
|
|
Energetyka Poznanska S.A. (COGEN)
|
278 000 (566 000 NLG)
|
|
Total
|
724 000 (1 476 000 NLG)
|
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other
Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the
Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of
endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties
Describe briefly the transfer of environmentally sound technology and know-how including where appropriate
the type of technology, terms, education, capacity building etc.
Business development and transfer of technology to the Joint Venture Cogen. Establishing a business and
institutional framework for the modernisation of similar BH’s. Technology transfer starts with gas
fired boilers and small scale co-generation systems involving transfer of technology in terms of
organisation, finance and operations.
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties,
effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered
Fill in as appropriate:
H. 1) Any practical experience gained:
H. 2) Technical difficulties:
During technical discussions appeared that due to very bad condition of circulation system of district
heating network there is a possibility that not all heat produced in a boiler house might be distributed to
the customers. So it was decided to extend investment by modernising also circulation system (pumps and
vessels for hot water accumulation).
H. 3) negative impacts and/or effects encountered:
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
Not expected
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental negative impacts/effects?
|
No
|
|
Describe social/cultural negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
Possible fear of gas explosion
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social negative impacts/effects?
|
No
|
|
Describe economic negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
Necessity of additional investment (circulation system). See H.2)
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic negative impacts/effects?
|
no
|
H. 4) Other obstacles encountered:
H. 5) Other:
The project was submitted to JIRC, the Dutch Joint Implementation Registration Centre, for registration.
