Your location: Home

ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY (AIJ)
 

Uniform Reporting Format:

Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase

List of Projects

A. Description of project

A. 1) Title of project:

Reduction of Atmospheric Pollution through modernisation of HEAT Supply system in the Town of ByCzyna.

A. 2) Participants/actors:

Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item "Function within activity".

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisation(a):

TNO-MEP

Name of organisation (English):

TNO-MEP

Department:

Department of Energy Technology and Fluid Dynamics

Acronym:

TNO-MEP

Acronym (English):

TNO-MEP

Function within activity:

Consultant/project management

Street:

Laan van Westenenk 501

P.O. Box 342

Post code:

7300 AH

City:

Apeldoorn

Country:

Netherlands

Telephone:

+31 55 549 34 93

Fax:

+31 55 541 98 37

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Brand, B.Sc.

First name, middle name:

Roel

Job title:

Direct tel.:

+31 55 549 38 03

Direct fax:

+31 55 549 37 40

Direct E-mail:

Roel.Brand@mep.tno.nl

a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisation(a):

Rada i Zarzad Miasta Byczyna

Name of organisation (English):

Byczyna Town Council

Department:

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function within activity:

Realisation of modernisation programme

Street:

Rynek 1

Post code:

46-220

City:

Byczyna

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 77) 413 41 50

Fax:

(+48 77) 413 41 50

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Pawlicki

First name, middle name:

Jacek

Job title:

Mayor

Direct tel.:

(+48 77) 413 41 50

Direct fax:

(+48 77) 413 41 50

Direct E-mail:

a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisation(a):

Remeha B.V.

Name of organisation (English):

Remeha B.V.

Department:

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function within activity:

Supplier of boilers

Street:

Kanaal Zuid 110

Post code:

P.O. 32, 7300 AA

City:

Apeldoorn

Country:

The Netherlands

Telephone:

+31 55 549 62 67

Fax:

+31 55 549 62 87

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Stol

First name, middle name:

Harald

Job title:

Sales Manager

Direct tel.:

Direct fax:

Direct E-mail:

a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisation(a):

ATMOTERMâ Sp. z o.o.

Name of organisation (English):

ATMOTERMâ Ltd

Department:

Acronym:

Atmoterm

Acronym (English):

Atmoterm

Function within activity:

Environmental consultant, local project manager

Street:

Ul. Katowicka 35

Post code:

45-061

City:

Opole

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 77) 56 67 60

Fax:

(+48 77) 54 39 84

E-mail:

sekretariat@atmoterm.pl

WWW-URL:

Http://www.atmoterm.pl

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mrs. Pazdan

First name, middle name:

Wanda

Job title:

Vice President

Direct tel.:

(+48) 602 63 35 49

Direct fax:

(+48 77) 54 20 37

Direct E-mail:

Wandapazdan@atmoterm.pl

a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisation(a):

Energetyka Cieplna Opolszczyzny

Name of organisation (English):

Opole District Heating Energy Enterprise

Department:

Acronym:

ECO

Acronym (English):

ECO

Function within activity:

Inventory of current situation, system design

Street:

ul. Harcerska 15

Post code:

45-158

City:

Opole

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 77) 54 96 85

Fax:

(+48 77) 54 33 66

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Gumieniak

First name, middle name:

Dariusz

Job title:

Head of Environmental Protection Department

Direct tel.:

(+48 77) 54 96 85 ext. 278

Direct fax:

(+48 77) 54 33 66

Direct E-mail:

Dgumien@ec.opole.pl

a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisation(a):

Narodowy Fundusz Ochrony Srodowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej, Sekretariat-JI

Name of organisation (English):

National Found for Environmental Protection and Water Management, JI-Secretariat

Department:

International Department

Acronym:

NFOSiGW

Acronym (English):

NFEP&WM

Function within activity:

National Focal Point, Reporting agency

Street:

Konstruktorska 3A

Post code:

02-673

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 849 22 80; 849 00 80

Fax:

(+48 22) 849 20 98

E-mail:

Jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl

WWW-URL:

Http://www. nfosigw.gov.pl

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mrs. Galon-Kozakiewicz, Ph.D.

First name, middle name:

Jolanta

Job title:

Head of JI-Secretariat

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 849 22 80; 849 00 80 ext. 504

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 849 20 98

Direct E-mail:

Jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl

a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

A. 3) Activity:

Item

Please fill in if applicable

General description:

The project concerns the modernization of heat supply system in the town of Byczyna located in the south-western part of Poland. The area which is subject of this project covers mainly the old town centre and one residential quarter which are supplied by 16 coal-fired boiler. The modernization consists in application of modern gas-fired boilers instead of existing coal - and coke fired boilers.

Implementation of the project involves:

· The dismantling of current coal-fired boiler houses;

· The construction of a gas distribution system;

· The building of new modern gas-fired boiler houses;

· The construction of a small network of heat distribution connecting new boiler houses with groups of heating buildings;

· The optimisation of heat distribution network.

Several additional activities like knowledge transfer on gas-fired boiler technology and energy efficiency are included in the project.

Type of project:a)

Fuel switching

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Byczyna, Poland

Activity starting date:

01-01-1998

Expected activity ending date:

31-12-1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed.

The project started in 1998 and is divided into two stages. At first stage (realization in 1998) 9 boiler houses were the subject of modernization. At second stage (realization in 1999) remaining 7 boiler houses will be modernized.

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

15 years

Technical data:d)

The power of boilers to be exchanged in Byczyna within the project amounts to 4.4 MW. REMEHA boilers are as heating equipment for greenhouse gases emission evaluation. High-methane natural gas (calorific value - 31 MJ/m3) is a fuel.

a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.

b) Circle the appropriate option.

c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.

d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data requirements are.

A. 4) Cost (to the extent possible):

Item

Year 1

1998

Year 2

1999

...

Year X

2013

Cost of the project in US$:

632 000

AIJ component in US$:

466 000

US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:

10

Describe briefly how costs are determined:

The cost effectiveness of the project (in US$ per avoided ton CO2 equivalent) is calculated according to the methodology used in the Dutch national CO2-reduction plan (annuity write of over the lifetime of the project, with an interest rate of 5 % divided by the amount of reduction per year).

A. 5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:

Describe the procedures, including name of organisations involveda):

- NFEP&WM, Sekretariat-JI: overall responsibility for review of JI projects, co-ordination and communication to the UNFCCC Secretariat, Polish Ministry of Environmental Protection Natural Resources and Forestry (MEPNRF), foreign donors on matters relating to JI activities in Poland;

- TNO: overall project management; support energy efficiency individual energy cost allocation/heating systems; organisation knowledge transfer;

- Byczyna Town Council: responsibility realisation modernisation programme; exploitation of the system;

- ECO Opole: inventory current situation; heat requirement study; system design;

- ATMOTERMâ : monitoring, including baseline; local project manager;

- REMEHA B.V.: Support TNO; delivery, installation and servicing boilers; training.

a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organisations mentioned is reported under

section A.2 above.

B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement

Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance, approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be shown as follows:

(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached letters issued by the relevant national authorities;

(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been received from all participating Parties.

B. 1) For the activity:

* First report and joint reporting: please add copies of letters of endorsement by each designated national authority of Parties involved in the activity.

* Subsequent reports:

Activity was: o suspended

o terminated earlier

Describe:

B. 2) This report is a joint report:

Yes, forward copy of agreement/endorsement by the designated national authorities involved

No

B. 3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:

C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies

Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies

Poland seeks energy security through stable energy deliveries at socially acceptable prices and with a minimal damage to the environment. Among the priority actions are to diversify the primary energy supplies and to comply with international environmental agreements to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. This project is designed to be fully-integrated and consistent with the goals and development strategies of the government of Poland.

AIR PROTECTION

This is based on:

· the "Implementation Program of the National Environmental Policy till the year to 2000",

· voivodeship lists of priority projects regarding environmental protection for 1998,

The aim of the undertakings concerning the air pollution control is to achieve reductions of pollutant emissions into the atmospheric air by both improving the fuel quality parameters and replacing fuel, by installing equipment that reduces the flue gas emissions of pollutants, by modernising and replacing technologies and by conserving energy.

A. Directions:

1. Support for the undertakings leading to reductions of the emissions into the atmospheric air of gas and particulate pollutants, by means of the modernisation and upgrading of the fuel production and burning technologies.

2. Support for the undertakings related to the rationalisation of heat systems, including the recovery of heat, national production of highly efficient heating equipment, combined with the use of unconventional energy sources.

B. Programmes:

1. National Programme for Reduction of Sulphur Dioxide Emissions.

2. Programme to eliminate low emissions.

3. Programme to reduce nitric oxide emissions.

4. Reduction of the exhaust gas emissions from the means of public transport, particularly in large urban-industrial agglomerations.

5. Programme for the use of alternative sources of energy.

D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project

Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)

Item

Please fill in

Describe environmental benefits in detail:

- elimination of severe environmental nuisance arising from heat production in coal boiler houses (dust, noise, transportation of coal and slag)

- predicted reduction of dust emissions by 99%; of SO2 over 99%; of NOx over 70%; of CO over 99%; of CO2 over 60%

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?

The above planned reduction rates are approximate

Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:

- substantial improvement of the environmental conditions in the city and thereby improving both the living conditions and tourist value of the old town

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?

No

Describe economic benefits in detail:

- improvement of the efficiency of heat production

- reduction of heat production costs

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?

No

E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real, measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not have occurred in the absence of such activities

E. 1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):

Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:

BASELINE STUDY ABSTRACT

The baseline study evaluates the starting point in pilot Joint Implementation project titled „Reduction of atmospheric pollution through modernisation of heat supply system in the town of Byczyna". Modernisation consists in application of modern gas-fired boilers instead of existing coal- and coke fired boilers.

The starting point was existing state evaluated for 1997. Below the results of baseline study are presented as well as description of methodology.

Results of baseline study

Total number of boiler houses covered by the project is 16. This includes:

- 3 boiler houses for heat and hot water supply

- other boiler houses for heat supply

Total number of boilers covered by the project is 27. This includes:

- 2 boilers with mechanical stoker and forced draught

- other boilers with hand-fired grate and chimney draught

Total installed power of boiler houses covered by the project amounts to 4.43 MW:

- 1 boiler house is of 1,8 MW power

- 6 boiler houses are of power 0,21 ¸ 0,4 MW

- 9 boiler houses are of power 0,025 ¸ 0,2 MW

Total required power of boiler houses amounts to 4.11 MW.

Fuel consumption in 1997 amounted to 2569 Mg:

- 51 % is fine coal burnt in 1 boiler house – mech. stoker

- 42 % is fine coal and coal burnt in 13 boiler houses – hand-fired grate

- 7 % is coke burnt in 4 boiler houses – hand-fired grate

Calculated fuel consumption is:

- 19,2 % higher then 1997 consumption for installed power option

- 16 % higher then 1997 consumption for required power option

Parameters of fuel used in 1997 (not every data were available):

- calorific value 22 ¸ 29 MJ/kg

- sulphur content 0,7 %

- ash content 3,8 % ¸ 20 %

Annual emission of greenhouse gases from 16 considered boiler houses amounts to:

- 6348 Mg CO2 equivalent - for 1997 fuel consumption

- 19,7 % higher for for fuel calculated from installed power

- 14,3 % higher for for fuel calculated from required power

Greenhouse gases emission factor for 16 considered boiler houses amounts to approximately 102 kg/GJ.

Greenhouse gases emissions

Emission - 1997 fuel consumption

Emission - fuel calculated from installed power

Emission - fuel calculated from required power

CO2

CH4a)

N2O

CO2

CH4

N2O

CO2

CH4

N2O

[Mg/a]

[kg/a]

[kg/a]

[Mg/a]

[kg/a]

[kg/a]

[Mg/a]

[kg/a]

[kg/a]

6155

7180

135

7365

8791

163

7065

6836

144

a) Methane emission from storage of coal and coke was also estimated but neglected because of low value

The other environmental aspects/impacts of considered existing 16 boiler was evaluated as follows:

- exceedings of dust deposition limit

- exceedings of 30-minutes concentration limits for sulphur dioxide and PM10

- annual amount of generated wastes (ash and slag) – approx. 500 Mg

- noise connected with the transport of fuel and wastes

Metodology

Site review

At this stage all relevant data concerning boilers and fuels as well as emitters were collected and stored in SOZATâ Local Environmental Pollution Database (LBZS). The detailed coordinates of emitters were derived using the digital map of Byczyna.

The above data were used then for assessment of greenhouse gases emissions as well as for assessment of other environmental aspects.

For the purpose of baseline study additional assumptions were made:

in the case when fuel parameters were not known (mainly sulphur content, partly also ash content and calorific value) the values were assumed basing on current practice of environmental fees calculation in Opole District:

in the case when information on 1997 consumption of fuel was not available the value calculated for installed boilers power was assumed as annual consumption

annual consumption of fuel was considered in three options:

- Ba1 = B’97 consumption of fuel registered in 1997

- Ba2 = B(Qk) calculated fuel demand for installed power of boilers (Qk); data included: number of „degree-days" (for Opole District - 3800), efficiency of existing boilers and calorific value of the fuel (as for fuel consumed in 1997)

- Ba3 = B(Qo) calculated fuel demand for required power of boilers (Qo); data included: the same as for Ba2 calculation

Greenhouse gases emission evaluation

The values of CO2, CH4 and N2O emission factors were consulted with Polish Ministry of Environmental Protection - MO ZNiL.

Non-greenhouse air pollutants emission evaluation

For CO, SO2, NOx and dust, values recommended by MOSZNiL for environmental fees were applied. For heavy metals and persistant organic pollutants (POPs) data from TNO/UBA study for Central and Eastern Europe were taken.

Emission factors of both greenhouse and non-greenhouse air pollutants are presented in the table below.

No.

Source of information

Air pollutant

Emission factor

code

Name

unit

mechanical stoker, forced draught

hard coal

hand grate, chimney draught

hard coal

hand grate, chimney draught

coke

1

MOSZNiL

001

Sulphur dioxide

kg/Mg

16´ Sc

16´ Sc

16´ Sc

2

MOSZNiL

002

Nitrogen oxides

kg/Mg

4

1

1.5

3

MOSZNiL

003

carbon monoxide

kg/Mg

20

45

25

4

TNO/UBA

005

PAH’s

g/Mg

11.9

11.9

11.9

5

TNO/UBA

034

Xylenes

g/GJ

2

2

2

6

TNO/UBA

040

Mercury

g/Mg

0.22

0.22

0.22

7

MOSZNiL

251

Methane

g/GJ

10

250

20

8

TNO/UBA

390

nitrous oxide

g/GJ

1.4

3

2.4

9

MOSZNiL

396

carbon dioxide

g/GJ

99000

98000

105000

10

MOSZNiL

800

dust

kg/Mg

2´ Ar

1.5´ Ar

1.5´ Ar

11

TNO/UBA

803

Lead

g/Mg

2.5

2.5

2.5

12

TNO/UBA

804

Chromium

g/Mg

0.9

0.9

0.9

13

TNO/UBA

806

Cadmium

g/Mg

0.15

0.15

0.15

14

TNO/UBA

807

Cooper

g/Mg

2.5

2.5

2.5

15

TNO/UBA

809

Arsenium

g/Mg

0.25

0.25

0.25

16

TNO/UBA

822

Zinc

g/Mg

10

10

10

17

TNO/UBA

849

Nickel

g/Mg

1.8

1.8

1.8

18

TNO/UBA

902

Dioxins/furans

m g/Mg

10

10

10

MOSZNiL

fly coal/coke

%

25

25

5

Notes:

„Sc" - total sulphur content in fuel [%]

„Ar" - ash content in fuel [%]

Calculation of emission values was performed using the SOZATâ LBZS software. Calculations were carried out for three options of fuel consumption: Ba1, Ba2 and Ba3 as described above.

Dispersion analysis (dust and sulphur dioxide)

Dispersion analysis for dust and sulphur dioxide was performed according to Polish „Guidelines for air quality assessment" using SOZATâ EK-100 software. The guidelines are based on Pasquill method for air concentration distribution and Krieb method for dust deposition.

Meteorological statistics includes:

wind velocity and direction

Pasquill-Gifford stability classes

Met statistics of the nearest station (Kluczbork town) was taken as there were no met data available for Byczyna. Kluczbork is located 15 km south from Byczyna.

Roughness factor z0 = 1 m was assumed for area being the subject of baseline study according to above mentioned guidelines.

E. 2) Estimated emissions with the activity:

Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:

Modernisation is to be carried out in two stages. At first stage (realisation in 1998, effects from 1999) 9 boiler houses were the subject of modernisation. At second stage (realisation in 1999, effects from 2000) other boiler houses will be modernised.

Fill in the following tables as applicable:

E.2.1) Summary table: Projected emission reductions:

GHG

Year 1

1999

Year 2

2000

...

Year 15

2013

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2, Mg

6155

6155

6155

CH4, kg

7180

7180

7180

N2O, kg

135

135

135

Other

B) Project activity scenarioa)

CO2, Mg

5120

2426

2426

CH4, kg

3059

62

61

N2O, kg

83.2

4.4

4.4

Other

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2, Mg

1035

3729

3729

CH4, kg

4121

7118

7118

N2O, kg

51.8

130.6

130.6

Other

D) Cumulative effect

CO2, Mg

1035

4764

53241

CH4, kg

4121

11239

103773

N2O, kg

51.8

182.4

17056

Other

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

F. Bearing in mind that the financing of activities implemented jointly shall be additional to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows, please indicate

Source of project funding

Including pre-feasibility phase

(For each source one line)

Amount

(US dollars)

Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs (PSO-JI)

466 000 (950 000 NLG)

ECO and Byczyna Town Council

166 000 (339 000 NLG)

Total

632 000 (1 289 000 NLG)

G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties

Describe briefly the transfer of environmentally sound technology and know-how including where appropriate the type of technology, terms, education, capacity building etc.

preparation and organisation of know-how transfer, including set-up of co-operation agreement between project partners and collaborating institutions regarding technology promotion, technological co-operation and know-how transfer

knowledge transfer and training regarding gas-fired boiler technology

knowledge transfer on energy efficiency issues

Byczyna public energy awareness campaigns

H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties, effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered

Fill in as appropriate:

H. 1) Any practical experience gained:

The authors of baseline study met difficulties when collecting data on fuel consumption and parameters. For some boiler houses full range of required data was not available. In those cases the assumptions were made. The lack of data in Byczyna showed that the evidence of small boilers operational data (e.g. fuel consumption) is not very good and sometimes does not exist.

To check the assumptions additional baseline options were considered:

emission calculated for required boilers power

emission calculated for installed boilers power

The results showed GHG calculated emission 14.3% (required power) or 19.7% (installed power) higher then the emission evaluated from 1997 fuel consumption. Basing on that result „measuring error" of baseline can be evaluated at the level of 15-20%.

H. 2) Technical difficulties:

H. 3) negative impacts and/or effects encountered:

Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)

Item

Please fill in

Describe environmental negative impacts/effects in detail:

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental negative impacts/effects?

no

Describe social/cultural negative impacts/effects in detail:

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social negative impacts/effects?

no

Describe economic negative impacts/effects in detail:

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic negative impacts/effects?

no

H. 4) Other obstacles encountered:

H. 5) Other:

The following comments can be pointed on using the Uniform Reporting Format:

The scope of section E.1 (project baseline).

The question arises how much information should be presented there. Should the abstract of baseline study include evaluation of the baseline for other environmental aspects (not the GHG emissions) and for technical state? In the case of Byczyna project we presented these two additional subjects generally. Description of methodology also contained the part concerning other environmental aspects (emission calculation of all non-GHG pollutants and dispersion modelling of dust/SO2 using SOZAT software) as well as technical state (site review).

The issue of other environmental aspects seems to be very interesting when considering emission reductions (section E.2 of URF report). In the case of Byczyna project the reductions of non-GHG pollutants (dust, SO2) are considerable and the environmental benefits at this side are very important. Dispersion modelling calculations show how the air quality in Byczyna will get better after the project completion.

The project was submitted to JIRC, the Dutch Joint Implementation Registration Centre, for registration.


Ready for some Climate Change News?

Visit the
NEWSROOM