Your location: Home


ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY (AIJ)

List of Projects

Uniform Reporting Format:

Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase

A. Description of project

1) Title of project: Jurmala, Boiler Conversion at the Dubulti Boiler House in Jurmala

2) Participants/actors:

Item

Financier/Reporter

Co-reporter

Name of organisation(a):

Statens Energimyndighet

Vides Aizsardzîbas un Regionâlâs Attîstîbas Ministrija

Name of organisation (English):

Swedish National Energy Administration

Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development of the Republic of Latvia

Department:

Secretariat for Climate Policy and International Co-operation

Environmental Protection Department

Acronym:

STEM

VARAM

Acronym (English):

STEM

Function within activity:

Assigned by the Swedish Government for Implementation including financing arrangements.

Assigned by the Latvian Government for activities implemented jointly

Street:

Kungsgatan 43

Peldu Str. 25

Post code:

S-117 86

LV 1494

City:

Eskilstuna

Riga

Country:

Sweden

Latvia

Telephone:

+46 16 544 20 00

+371-7 026 508

Fax:

+46 16 544 22 64

+371-7 820 442

E-mail:

klas.tennberg@stem.se

erna@varam.gov.lv

WWW-URL:

http://www.stem.se

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

-------------------------------------

Surname:

Knutsson

Apene

First name, middle name:

Gudrun

Ingrid

Job title:

senior officer

senior official

Direct tel:

+46 16 544 20 72

+371-7 026 508

Direct fax:

+46 16 544 22 64

+371-7 820 442

Direct E-mail:

gudrun.knutsson@stem.se

erna@varam.gov.lv

Borrower

Name of organisation(a):

Name of organisation (English):

SIA " Dubultu skelda " of Jurmala

Department:

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function within activity:

borrower

Street:

47 a, Slokas Street

Post code:

LV-2015

City:

Jurmala

Country:

Latvia

Telephone:

+371-276 9684

Fax:

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

Surname:

Knislis

First name, middle name:

Arvids

Job title:

Chairman of the Board

Direct tel:

+371 7769 715

Direct fax:

Direct E-mail:

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organization(a):

EKODOMA

ÅF International AB

Name of organization (English):

EKODOMA

AF International AB

Department:

Acronym:

ÅFE

Acronym (English):

AFE

Function within activity:

Local reporter

Technical support

Street:

Biskapa gate 6-1

Stensjögatan 3

Post code:

LV 1050

S-217 65

City:

Riga

MALMÖ

Country:

LATVIA

SWEDEN

Telephone:

+371-7 210 597

+46-40-37 50 00

Fax:

+371-7 210 597

+46 40 13 03 69

E-mail:

ekodoma@mail.bkc.lv

WWW-URL:

http://www.af.se

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

-------------------------------------

Surname:

Kass

Mårtensson

First name, middle name:

Ilmars

Roland

Job title:

project manager

project leader

Direct tel:

+371 7 210 597

+46-40-37 51 04

Direct fax:

+372-7 210 597

+46-40-13 03 69

Direct E-mail:

ilmars-eko@mail.bkc.lv

rmn@ens.af.se

a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

3) Activity:

Item

Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Jurmala is a resort town close to Riga. There are several gas/oilfired boiler plants and district heating networks in Jurmala. Dubulti boiler plant has three gas/oil-fired KGVM boilers. The total annual heat production/

demand is around 60 000 MWh.

Type of project:a)

Fuel switching to renewable

Location (exact, e.g. city, region,

state):

Jurmala

LATVIA

Activity starting date:

10. February 1995 (letter-of-intent)

In operation from:

March 1996

Expected activity ending date:

Loan expire date 31. March 2006

Stage of activity:b)

Complete

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

Expected technical lifetime is 15 years which means that the plant is expected to be in operation till 2011.

Technical data:d)

Conversion of an oil-fired KGVM 10-14 boiler to wood chips firing by installing moving inclined air-cooled grate. Estimated power output abt 7 MW. The conversion is estimated to result in an annual heat production of around 40 000 MWh.

a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.

b) Circle the appropriate option.

c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.

Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data requirements are.

Lifetime of activity

Heat production plants (bio fuel)

25 years

New installation of all main equipment parts (fuel handling system, firing equipment and boiler) and modernisation of secondary equipment.

15 years

Conversion of existing boiler but new installation fuel handling system and firing equipment. Modernisation of secondary equipment.

10 years

Limited installation of new equipment (only one part of the three main parts, normally the firing equipment). Modernisation of other equipment.

Heat distribution systems and sub-stations

25 years

Pre-fabricated pipes and installations using certified contractors and supervisor according to EN norms and applicable district heating practise

15 years

Pre-fabricated pipes and installations without using certified contractors and supervisor

10 years

Modernisation of existing pipes.

Energy efficiency in buildings

25 years

Additional insulation roofs walls etc. with Scandinavian technology.

New installed heating systems.

15 years

Renovation and balancing of heating systems including thermostat valves.

10 years

Weather stripping windows, doors etc.

* if a combination of measures is done a reasonable lifetime for the project have to be calculated.

4) Cost (to the extent possible):

To the investment costs are referred the cost of the investment proper and the accumulated interest during the grace period, generally 2 years.

The AIJ/JI cost items are the costs for:

  • Technical assistance, a technical and administrative support from consultants, during the period from definition of the project till commissioning. These costs are paid by STEM.
  • Follow-up, an annual technical and economic follow-up by consultants, hired by STEM, of the operating results of the plant with the objective to improve on its techno-economic sustainability and its climate effect. The cost indicated is an average cost per project.
  • Reporting costs – i e costs in connection with the annual reporting of the project’s climate effects to UNFCCC. The cost indicated is an average cost per project.
  • Administration – average costs of STEM staff per project.

Difference in interest rates. STEM applies for its loans generally an interest rate corresponding to 6-month STIBOR (Stockholm InterBank Rate, in April 1999 3,0 %). Assuming a normal lending rate of 7 % means that this loan is associated with a cost of 4 % in relation to normal lending rate. * if a combination of measures is done a reasonable lifetime for the project have to be calculated.

Investment/instalment = the borrower’s possible own financing of the investment, followed by the borrower’s repayment of the loan.

All costs in USD

Country

Jurmala Dubulti BC

1996

1997

1998

0

1

2

Investment

1. Loan/debt to STEM

738000

776500

661875

2. Added costs

0

54875

17000

3.Technical assistance

90000

0

0

AIJ/JI

4. Follow up

0

10625

2750

A. Sweden

costs

5. Reporting costs

0

1063

0

6. Administration

50000

0

0

7. Difference in interest

4%

31060

26475

8.Accum. costs for AIJ/JI

140000

182748

211973

9.Total costs

878000

959248

873848

Investment

1. Investment/amortization

0

16375

131625

Latvia

AIJ/JI

2. Reporting costs

0

0

0

3. Other osts

0

0

0

costs

4. Accum. costs for AIJ/JI

0

0

0

5. Total costs

0

16375

148000

1 USD=

8

SEK

5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:

Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involveda):

It is stated in agreement between STEM and Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development of the Republic of Latvia that local organisation in Latvia, company EKODOMA is assigned for the data collection and evaluation of the climate effects of this project. After an initial work in cooperation with STEM’s assigned consultant, this local organisation would take the main responsibility the continued measuring for JI-reporting.

a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations mentioned is reported under

section A.2 above.

B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement

Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance, approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be shown as follows:

(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached letters issued by the relevant national authorities;

(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been received from all participating Parties.

1) For the activity:

  • * Subsequent reports:

Second report . First report was submitted 1997.

2) This report is a joint report:

  • Yes, Agreement with designated national authority was signed 1997.

3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:

Yes, Agreement with Latvian Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development was signed on March 1999. cf. Annex II, section B

C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio economic and environment priorities and strategies

Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies

The Swedish side considers that the project meets the following objectives in the Latvian Energy Law:

- efficient use of energy resources;

  • creation and usage of energy efficient technologies, fuel/energy consuming and diagnostic equipment, construction and insulation materials; energy flow metering and control devices, automated energy consumption control systems;

Latvia became a Party of the United nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1992.

In accordance with Kyoto Protocol to the UN FCCC on 10 December 1997, Latvia individually or jointly should ensure, that its aggregate anthropogenic CO2 equivalent emissions of CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs and SF6 in 2008 - 2012 should be 8% below the 1990 level.

D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project

Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)

Item

Please fill in

Describe environmental benefits in detail:

Decreased emissions:

9 400 ton CO2

Better silviculture

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?

Yes.

Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:

More stable energy supply.

Improved working conditions, increased motivation

More employment (fuel companies)

Improved trade balance.

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?

Yes.

Describe economic benefits in detail:

Decreased fuel costs approx. 3.5 USD/MWh.

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?

No.

E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real, measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not have occurred in the absence of such activities

1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):

Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:

Present data reflect emission reductions using status quo (emissions in the period before the conversion to renewable fuel) for the baseline case. Calculations, according to the top-down method, for emissions from

different types of projects in the baseline case are being made. The changed calculation method will result in a change in emission reduction. The new data will be introduced as soon as available.

2) Estimated emissions with the activity:

Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:

Emission reductions are calculated using the IPCC Guidelines, using the Carbon Emission Factor (CEF) for different types of fuel, using actual system efficiency. For boiler conversion, the decrease in emissions is calculated in relation to the amount of fossil fuel replaced (status quo). For an energy efficiency project the decrease in emissions reflects the amount of fuel that is saved through the project. In the case that the

system uses renewable fuels, the reduction is calculated comparing the amount of fossil fuels that was used before the conversion to renewable fuels.

The comparison below is based upon that the base-line scenario represents a status quo solution.

Fill in the following tables as applicable:

Summary table: Projected emission reductions:

GHG

Year 1

=1996

Year 2

=1997

Year 3

=1998

...

Year 15

Energy production at plant based upon the baseline (MWh/year)

40 000

40 000

40 000

40 000

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

9400

9400

9400

9400

CH4

N2O

other

B) Project activity scenarioa)

CO2

0

0

0

0

CH4

N2O

other

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

-9400

-9400

-9400

-9400

CH4

N2O

Other

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

-9400

-18800

-28200

-141 000

CH4

N2O

Other

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

Summary table: Actual emission reductions:

GHG

Year 1

= 1996

Year 2

= 1997

Year 3

=1998

...

Year 15

Factual energy production on biofuels/ saved energy (MWh/year)

16700

32900

42 300

42300

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

3900

7750

9900

9900

CH4

N2O

other

B) Project activity scenarioa)

CO2

0

0

0

0

CH4

N2O

other

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

-3900

-7750

-9900

-9900

CH4

N2O

Other

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

-3900

-11650

-21550

-140350

CH4

N2O

Other

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages. CO2 emission level is 0 because only produced energy on bio fuels is taken into account.

F. Additionality to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows

Please indicate all sources of project funding.

Category of funding

(For each source one line)

Amount

(US dollars)

Loan from NUTEK/STEM

790.778USD

Grant from NUTEK/STEM for technical assistance

96.431USD

1 USD = 7.50 SEK

G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties

Transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how

Describe briefly

Schematically, the transfer of knowledge involves the following activities over time:

i) Technology transfer through NUTEK/ STEMs technical specialist during the implementation of the project.

ii) Technology transfer through cooperation between foreign supplier and local partner

iii) Conferences, seminars, documentation and training.

iv) Stimulate "net-working" for the exchange of experience between plant owners with similar problems, e. g. "bio-clubs"

i) technology transfer has taken place through NUTEK

/STEMs technical specialist support to the local project leader and municipality as well as boiler plant staff.

ii) local companies took part in the project implementation phase (ground works, building, civil engineering works), the main contractor for the equipment delivery has been company HOTAB Eldningsteknik AB (Sweden)

iii) Special training courses for boiler house operators were arranged by the main contractor on operation/

maintenance of wood fuel burning plant.

Translation of manuals and safety regulations for boiler operation.

The staff from boiler plant has been invited to different seminars and work-shops, documentation for training has been handed over. The following seminars in Latvia have been organized by support from STEM:

  • "Environmentally Adapted Energy Systems in Baltic States and Eastern Europe", Cesis, 23 November, 1994;
  • "Prospects for small boiler conversion to biofuel in Latvia", Rauna, March, 1996
  • "Possibilities for wood fuel utilization in Latvia", Broceni, 17 April, 1997;
  • "Waste wood for boiler houses", Liepa municipality, 5 June, 1998
  • presentation of book translated from Swedish to Latvian "Environmentally adapted local energy systems", author Niels Moe (STEM), seminars in Balvi, Jelgava, Saldus, 6-8 May, 1998

iv) Specialists of other boiler houses have visited the boiler plant, the staff has an exchange of experience with other boiler plants. Management was active in "bio-club" established in 1994, now is member of Bioenergy Association. Association was founded on December 1998 with the support from STEM and is aimed to closer relations among the plant owners, municipalities, equipment suppliers and consultants.

Endogenous capacity supported or enhanced:

Endogenous capacity

(Name of organization1)

Development (DEV) /

enhancement (ENH)

Describe briefly

SIA HOLM

DEV

New type of project for the local

civil engineering company.

1) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations listed is reported under section A.2 above.

H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties, effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered

Fill in as appropriate:

  1. Any practical experience gained:

Heating company have new modern technology based on wood fuel utilization. It is possible to use different wood fuel: wood chips, sawdust, as well as residues from the wood processing companies that was dumped out before project realization.

  1. Technical difficulties: No
  2. Effects encountered:

The project realization gave:

  • reduced fuel costs;
  • improved environment;
  • new working places for fuel supply, and plant operation;
  • reduced dependence from the imported fuel;
  • better economy for the local regional level;
  • cooperation between Baltic and Nordic countries;
  • involvement of local companies for project implementation;
  • ideas for new fuel conversion projects.

4) Impacts encountered:

5) Other obstacles encountered:

Due to limited load from consumer side during summer time boiler operates with partial load, therefore loosing efficiency, little bit.

6) Other: