Uniform Reporting Format:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
List of
Projects
A. Description of project
1) Title of project:
Baisogala Boiler Conversion
2) Participants/actors:
|
Item
|
Financier/Reporter
|
Co-reporter
|
|
Name of organisation(a):
|
Statens Energimyndighet
|
Aplinkos Ministerija
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Swedish National Energy Administration
|
Ministry of Environment
|
|
Department:
|
Secretariat for Climate Policy and International Co-operation
|
Environmental Quality Department
|
|
Acronym:
|
STEM
|
AM
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
STEM
|
MoE
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Assigned by the Swedish Government for implementation including financing arrangements.
|
Assigned by the Lithuanian Government for activities implemented jointly
|
|
Street:
|
Kungsgatan 43
|
Jakšto 4
|
|
Post code:
|
BOX 310, S-631 04
|
LT-2600
|
|
City:
|
Eskilstuna
|
Vilnius
|
|
Country:
|
Sweden
|
Lithuania
|
|
Telephone:
|
+46-16 544 20 00
|
+370-2 61 90 49
|
|
Fax:
|
+46-16 544 22 64
|
+370-2-22 08 47
|
|
E-mail:
|
klas.tennberg@stem.se
|
dalia.s@nt.gamta.lt
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.stem.se
|
http://www.gamta.lt
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Knutsson
|
Bilkis
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Gudrun
|
Mindaugas
|
|
Job title:
|
Senior officer
|
Director of Environmental Quality Dept.
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+46-16 544 20 72
|
+370-2-61 90 49
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+46-16 544 22 64
|
+370-2-22 08 47
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
gudrun.knutsson@stem.se
|
atm@nt.gamta.lt
|
|
Borrower
|
|
Name of organisation(a):
|
UAB "Pakirsinio Komunalinis Ukis"
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Joint Stock Company "Pakirsinio Komunalinis Ukis"
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Borrower
|
|
Street:
|
-
|
|
Post code:
|
5120
|
|
City:
|
Radviliskio district, Pakirsinio village
|
|
Country:
|
Lithuania
|
|
Telephone:
|
+370 92 44 584
|
|
Fax:
|
-
|
|
E-mail:
|
-
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
-
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
|
|
Surname:
|
EDMUNDAS
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
VALBA
|
|
Job title:
|
Director
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+370 92 44 584
|
|
Direct fax:
|
-
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
-
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Lietuvos energetikos institutas
|
ÅF Energikonsult Syd AB
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Lithuanian Energy Institute
|
|
|
Department:
|
Heat-Equipment Research and Testing Laboratory
|
AF - International AB
|
|
Acronym:
|
LEI
|
ÅFE
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
LEI
|
AFE
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Local reporter
Responsible for the measuring and collecting results for EAES-reporting.
|
Technical support
|
|
Street:
|
Breslaujos 3
|
Stensjögatan 3
|
|
Post code:
|
LT 3035
|
S-217 65
|
|
City:
|
Kaunas
|
MALMÖ
|
|
Country:
|
Lithuania
|
SWEDEN
|
|
Telephone:
|
+ 370 (7) 75 34 95
|
+46-40-37 50 00
|
|
Fax:
|
+ 370 (7) 35 12 71
|
+46-40-13 03 69
|
|
E-mail:
|
testlab@isag.lei.lt
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.lei.lt
|
http://www.af.se
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Pedisius
|
Mårtensson
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Nerijus
|
Roland
|
|
Job title:
|
Senior Research Associate
|
project leader
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+ 370 (7) 75 31 83
|
+46-40-37 51 04
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+ 370 (7) 35 12 71
|
+46-40-13 03 69
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
nerijus@isag.lei.lt
|
rmn@ens.af.se
|
|
|
|
a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc.
involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency
closely following the activity.
3) Activity:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Baisogala is a small town in the middle of Lithuania. There are two separat boiler plants in two
separat nets. In one boiler plant with an annual production about 12 000 MWh, there were two
coal-fired DKVR 4-13 boilers.
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Fuel switching to renewable
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region,
state):
|
Baisogala town
Radviliskis Region
LITHUANIA
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1995-03-22(Letter of Intent)
|
|
In operation from:
|
December 1995
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
30. September 2005
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Complete
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
Expected technical lifetime is 15 years which means that the plant is expected to be in operation
till 2009.
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Conversion of a DKVR 4-13 coal-fired boiler. The output power after conversion is estimated at 3 MW
and an annual heat production of around 12 000 MWh
|
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency;
renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation;
fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data
requirements are.
Lifetime of activity
Heat production plants (bio fuel)
|
25 years
|
New installation of all main equipment parts (fuel handling system, firing equipment and boiler)
and modernisation of secondary equipment.
|
|
15 years
|
Conversion of existing boiler but new installation fuel handling system and firing equipment.
Modernisation of secondary equipment.
|
|
10 years
|
Limited installation of new equipment (only one part of the three main parts, normally the firing
equipment). Modernisation of other equipment.
|
Heat distribution systems and sub-stations
|
25 years
|
Pre-fabricated pipes and installations using certified contractors and supervisor according to EN
norms and applicable district heating practise
|
|
15 years
|
Pre-fabricated pipes and installations without using certified contractors and supervisor
|
|
10 years
|
Modernisation of existing pipes.
|
Energy efficiency in buildings
|
25 years
|
Additional insulation roofs walls etc. with Scandinavian technology.
New installed heating systems.
|
|
15 years
|
Renovation and balancing of heating systems including thermostat valves.
|
|
10 years
|
Weather stripping windows, doors etc.
|
- if a combination of measures is done a reasonable lifetime for the project have to be calculated.
4) Plant cost (to the extent possible):
To the investment costs are referred the cost of the investment proper and the accumulated interest during
the grace period, generally 2 years.
The AIJ/JI cost items are the costs for:
- Technical assistance, a technical and administrative support from consultants, during the period from
definition of the project till commissioning. These costs are paid by STEM.
- Follow-up, an annual technical and economic follow-up by consultants, hired by STEM, of the operating
results of the plant with the objective to improve on its techno-economic sustainability and its climate
effect. The cost indicated is an average cost per project.
- Reporting costs – i e costs in connection with the annual reporting of the project’s
climate effects to UNFCCC. The cost indicated is an average cost per project.
- Administration – average costs of STEM staff per project.
- Difference in interest rates. STEM applies for its loans generally an interest rate corresponding to
6-month STIBOR (Stockholm InterBank Rate, in April 1999 3,0 %). Assuming a normal lending rate of 7 % means
that this loan is associated with a cost of 4 % in relation to normal lending rate.
Investment/instalment = the borrower’s possible own financing of the investment, followed by the
borrower’s repayment of the loan.
All costs in USD
|
Country
|
|
Baisogala
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
1998
|
|
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Investment
|
1. Loan/debt to STEM
|
406375
|
469375
|
505500
|
442375
|
|
|
2. Added costs
|
0
|
63000
|
36125
|
0
|
|
|
3.Technical assistance
|
77500
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
AIJ/JI
|
4. Follow up
|
0
|
10250
|
10625
|
2750
|
|
A. Sweden
|
costs
|
5. Reporting costs
|
0
|
0
|
1063
|
0
|
|
|
6. Administration
|
66250
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
7. Difference in interest
|
4%
|
18775
|
20220
|
17695
|
|
|
8.Accum. costs for AIJ/JI
|
143750
|
172775
|
204683
|
225128
|
|
|
9.Total costs
|
550125
|
642150
|
710183
|
667503
|
|
Investment
|
1. Investment/Instalment
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
63125
|
|
2. Lithuania
|
AIJ/JI
|
2. Reporting costs
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
costs
|
3. Other costs
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
4. Accum. costs for AIJ/JI
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
5. Total costs
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
63125
|
|
1 USD=
|
8
|
SEK
|
|
|
|
|
5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involveda):
|
|
Lithuanian Ministry of Environment is a central Lithuanian authority responsible on reporting of
JI-projects. This authority assigns a local organisation Lithuanian Energy Institute which is
involved in to the evaluation of the climate effects of this project. Lithuanian Energy Institute
takes the main responsibility to continue measuring, results collecting for JI-reporting.
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organisations mentioned is reported under
section A.2 above.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance,
approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be
shown as follows:
(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one
participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached
letters issued by the relevant national authorities;
(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national
authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been
received from all participating Parties.
1) For the activity:
Second report.
-
This report is a joint report:
- Yes, Endorsement letter was submitted 1998.
3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
-
Activity. The scope of work of this agreement consist of collection basic data, examination project
possibilities, engineering, supervision, inspection, local investigations, preparation reports. cf.
Annex II, section B.
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio-economic and
environment priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national
economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies
|
|
The project meets with a o the following objectives in the Lithuanian energy sector:
- to reduce the energy intensity
- to reduce dependence on fuel imports
- to create new working places
- to involve the local companies into production of equipment for new firing technology
- to create and improve energy infrastructure based on indigenous energy resources
- to utilize the existing energy production capacity efficiently
- to reduce of fossil fuel consumption which results in emission reduction and currency saving
- to develop cooperation between Baltic, Nordic and other Central European countries
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
Annual emissions reduction:
Projected 1998
6 080 ton CO2 2 635 ton CO2
27 ton SO2 12 ton SO2
4 ton NOx 2 ton NOx
Boilerplant is firing sawmill waste which earlier was deposited in the forest
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
Yes. Collected by LEI 1998.
|
|
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:
|
More stable energy supply.
Improved working conditions, increased motivation
Normal heat and hot water supply conditions (The heat could earlier only be supplied on a min level
and hot tap-water was only supplied on 3 days per month).
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?
|
No.
|
|
Describe economic benefits in detail:
|
Reduced fuel price
After bioconversion of boiler consumers received the hot water and the selling heat price was
reduced about 30%
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?
|
Yes. Collected by LEI experts since 1997 and updated every year.
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real,
measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not
have occurred in the absence of such activities
1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:
Present data reflect emission reductions using status quo (emissions in the period before the conversion to
renewable fuel) for the baseline case.
Calculation methods are being revised and will result in a change in emission reduction.
The new data will be introduced as soon as available.
2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:
Emission reductions are calculated using the IPCC Guidelines, using the Carbon Emission Factor (CEF) for
different types of fuel, using actual system efficiency. For boiler conversion, the decrease in emissions
is calculated in relation to the amount of fossil fuel replaced (status quo).
For an energy efficiency project the decrease in emissions reflects the amount of fuel that is saved
through the project. In the case that the system uses renewable fuels, the reduction is calculated
comparing the amount of fossil fuels that was used before the conversion to renewable fuels.
Below comparison is based upon that the base-line scenario represents a status quo solution.
Fill in the following tables as applicable:
Summary table: Projected emission reduction s:
|
GHG
|
Year 1
= 1996
|
Year 2
= 1997
|
Year 3
= 1998
|
...
|
Year 15
|
|
Planned energy production MWh/year
Biofuel
Coal
|
|
12 000
|
12000
|
12 000
|
|
12 000
|
|
Planned annual fuel consumption MWh/year
Biofuel
Coal
|
|
14 634
|
14 634
|
14 634
|
|
14 634
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
6 080
|
6 080
|
6 080
|
|
6 080
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
-6 080
|
-6 080
|
-6 080
|
|
-6 080
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
-6 080
|
-12 160
|
18 240
|
|
-91 200
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
Summary table: Actual emission reductions :
|
GHG
|
Year 1
= 1996
|
Year 2
= 1997
|
Year 3
= 1998
|
...
|
Year 15
|
|
Factual energy production MWh/year
Biofuel
Mazout /light-oil
|
|
12 000
|
5 685
|
5 200
|
|
5 200
|
|
Factual annual fuel consumption MWh/year
Biofuel
Mazout/light oil
|
|
14 634
|
6 933
|
6 341
|
|
6 341
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
6 080
|
2 880
|
2 635
|
|
2 635
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
-6 080
|
-2 880
|
-2 635
|
|
-2 635
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
-6 080
|
-8 960
|
-11 595
|
|
-43 215
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
- Includes indirect GHG leakage.
- The converted boiler house have been concentrate on bio-fuel firing, remaining load have been produced
in central boilerhouse ( net are connected ). Therefore gas have been used to calculate reductions.
- On going work aim to increase the load on the converted boiler for that reason future production is
estimated to 35 000 MW/h, baseline figures used year 1 real not available.
F. Additionality to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the
framework of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows
Please indicate all sources of project funding.
|
Category of funding
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(US dollars)
|
|
Loan from NUTEK
|
540.000
|
|
Grant from NUTEK for technical assistance
|
82.000
|
1 USD = 7.50 SEK
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to
other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the
Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of
endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties
|
Transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how
|
Describe briefly
|
|
Schematically, the transfer of knowledge involves the following activities over time:
i) Technology transfer through STEM technical specialist during the implementation of the project.
- Technology transfer through cooperation between foreign supplier and local partner
- Conferences, seminars, documentation and training.
iv) Stimulate "net-working" for the exchange or experience between plant owners with
similar problems, e g "bio-clubs"
|
Technology transfer has taken place through
- STEM technical specialist support to the local project leader and municipality.
A following-up group for testing and adjustment of converted boilers has been formed in Lithuanian
Energy Institute. Personnel of Heat-Equipment Research and Testing Laboratory is carrying out
following up procedures keeping a close relation with and AF Energikonsult company as the main
supervisor of conversion projects supported by STEM.
- The execution of these biofuel conversion projects was mainly performed by the local
company "Kazlu Rudos Metalas" with participation of the Swedish company
"Hotab".
iii) Staff from boiler plant has been invited to different seminars and workshops, documentation
for training has been handed over.
There were arranged three seminars through close cooperation between STEM and LEI:
/Environmentally Friendly Energy Systems in the Baltic and Eastern Europe Countries/ (Seminar),
Kaunas, 21-22 March, 1995
/Environmentally Adapted Energy Systems in the Baltic Region and Eastern Europe/ (Seminar), Birzai,
19-20 November, 1998.
/Environmentally-Adapted Local Energy Systems /(Seminar and book presentation), Druskininkai, 21
November, 1998.
Translation and preparation of operation and safety regulations for wood waste burning boiler
houses.
This job was supported by STEM.
- Association "Bioenergy and energy saving" has been founded at the end of 1997 to
coordinate the attempts of wood firing equipment producers, wood wastes suppliers and owners of
boiler plants.
|
Endogenous capacity supported or enhanced:
|
Endogenous capacity
(Name of organization1)
|
Development (DEV) /
enhancement (ENH)
|
Describe briefly
|
|
AB "Kazlu Rudos Metalas"
AB "Umega"
AB "Kazlu Rudos Metalas"
AB "Singaras"
AB "Elhamers"
|
DEV
DEV
ENH
|
New biofuel firing technology has been developed. Experience in installation and exploitation of
modern western technology.
The straw burning technology has been started to spread as continuation of successfully realized
biofuel conversion projects.
Many smaller boiler conversion projects were successfully finished in Lithuania by local companies
AB "Kazlu Rudos Metalas", AB "Singaras", AB "Elhamers"during past
five years. The implementation of these projects was initiated by the successfully realized STEM
projects.
|
1) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations listed is reported under section
A.2 above .
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties,
effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered
1) Any practical experience gained:
2) Technical difficulties:. Problem with district heating economiser, too low temperature resulted
in the chimney. Shunt was wrongly connected. The boiler load was earlier controlled by the pressure. It was
later changed so the load was controlled by temperature.
3) Effects encountered: Execution of biofuel conversion projects according to STEM JI programme
caused the activity in the following fields:
- production of pre-furnaces and small wood fired boilers by local companies;
- formation a new policy as respect to cleaning the forests and using the wood wastes or preparation of
wood fuel by the forestry industry/administrations;
- research and testing the new equipment, execution of the following up activity, training the local
personnel and etc.
4) Impacts encountered: The buildings in the surrounding area have become significantly warmer than
earlier. The prices of the real estates have risen.
5) Other obstacles encountered:
The main unsolved problem for this boiler house is the assurance of full load during the heating season and
as much as possible during the summer time. The yearly heat production has decreased from 5 685 MWh in 1997
to 5 200 MWh in 1998.
6) Other: After the transfer of the ownership of the boiler-house to the local municipality the
formation of heat prices now are subject to local decisions.
