NEGOTIATIONS
FOCUS
PROCESS
KEY STEPS
|
|
Your location: Home |
|
USIJI Uniform Reporting Document:
|
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
A. Description of the AIJ project
1. Title of project: Aeroenergía S.A. Wind Facility
2. Host country: Costa Rica
3. Brief project description:
The Aeroenergía S.A. Wind Facility Project is a privately owned and operated 6.4 megawatt (MW) wind
facility consisting of 16 wind turbines. The project is located near the town of Tejona in the Guanacaste
province of Costa Rica. Electricity generated by the plant will be sold to the Costa Rican Institute of
Electricity (ICE) to meet a portion of Costa Rica's energy demand. Because this generation will
displace electricity that otherwise would have been generated by existing thermal plants, it reduces
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from fossil fuel combustion.
4. Participants:
|
Name of Organization or Individual
|
Country
|
|
Aeroenergía S.A.
|
Costa Rica
|
|
Power Systems, Inc.
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Bluefields International
|
U.S.A.
|
|
EnergyWorks
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Micon A/S
|
Denmark
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Aeroenergía S.A.
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project development, project administration
|
|
Street
|
Apartado. 1689-1000
|
|
City
|
San José
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Costa Rica
|
|
Telephone
|
011-506-221-3413
|
|
Fax
|
011-506-255-3410
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Lechtman
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Salomón
|
|
Job title
|
General Manager
|
|
Direct telephone
|
011-506-227-4555
|
|
Direct fax
|
011-506-227-0816
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
genelec@sol.racsa.co.cr
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Power Systems, Inc.
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Technical assistance
|
|
Street
|
12444 Breckenridge
|
|
City
|
Dallas
|
|
State
|
Texas
|
|
Post code
|
75230
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Viroslav
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Sam
|
|
Job title
|
General Manager
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Viroslav
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Joseph
|
|
Job title
|
Officer
|
|
Direct telephone
|
214-879-6555
|
|
Direct fax
|
214-350-6320
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Bluefields International
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project development, financing
|
|
Street
|
1000 Connecticut Avenue, NW; Suite 1200
|
|
City
|
Washington
|
|
State
|
District of Columbia
|
|
Post code
|
20036-5302
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Warner
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Guy G.
|
|
Job title
|
Partner
|
|
Direct telephone
|
202-331-8273
|
|
Direct fax
|
202-331-8878
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
EnergyWorks
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
|
|
Street
|
8201 Corporate Drive, Suite 1200
|
|
City
|
Landover
|
|
State
|
Maryland
|
|
Post code
|
20785
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
301-459-1874
|
|
Fax
|
301-459-2842
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Eckel
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Jeffrey W.
|
|
Job title
|
President and CEO
|
|
Direct telephone
|
301-459-1874
|
|
Direct fax
|
301-459-2842
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Micon A/S
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project development, technical support
|
|
Street
|
|
|
City
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Denmark
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
5. Description of AIJ project activities:
|
Item
|
|
|
Type of Project
|
|
Sector(s)
|
Energy
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Alternative energy generation (wind)
|
|
Project Location
|
|
Country
|
Costa Rica
|
|
Exact location (city, state, region)
|
Tilarán, Guanacaste, Costa Rica
|
|
Key Dates and Current Stage of Project
|
|
Project starting date (month/year)
|
August 1998
|
|
Project ending date (month/year)
|
April 2017
|
|
Project lifetime (years)
|
21 years, 1 month (may be extended as useful life is expected to exceed 20 years)
|
|
Current stage of project
|
In progress
|
|
General Project Description and Technical Data
|
|
The Aeroenergía Windfarm Project is a privately owned and operated 6.4 MW wind facility
consisting of 16 wind turbines. Each turbine consists of a round tower, 100 feet tall, with two
generators of 400 kilowatts (KW) and 100 KW, and three upwind blades. The machine is stall-type
and controls a constant speed, supplying different power levels depending on wind speed. The
simplicity of the system, its advanced technology, and proven reliability will reduce project
risks. The project facility became operational in May 1997.
Site-specific geological studies indicate the terrain is very stable. Windfarm operations are
consistent with current land uses, primarily cattle-grazing.
Energy produced by the facility will be sold to ICE and will displace electricity that would have
been generated by thermal fossil fuel-burning facilities. The net delivered output offered to ICE
is expected to be from 27 to 31 gigawatthours (GWh) per year. An assumed output of 27 GWh is used
to estimate the GHG benefits of the project.
Costa Rica is a particularly strong candidate for substituting wind power for fossil fuels in
electricity generation because the country’s wind resource is at its strongest during the
time when reservoirs are lowest and Costa Rica relies more heavily on thermal production. Adding
wind to its power source portfolio would allow ICE to maximize use of its wind and hydroelectric
resources by reducing water flow over the dams when the wind is strong and the water is low,
storing the water to be spilled when the wind strength falls off. This potential made Costa Rica
a good choice for developing a wind electric project specifically intended to achieve GHG
emission reductions.
|
6. Cost:
(a) Explanation of methodology for calculating cost data
|
Methodology for Calculating Cost Data
|
|
The project developer estimated the capital cost of the project to be approximately US$8.85
million. This estimate includes (1) facility costs associated with the actual physical plant and
transmission/inter-connections costs, and (2) non-facility costs such as legal and financing
costs associated with project development. The project will be financed entirely through private
sources of capital.
|
(b) Cost data–Project development
This information is not yet available.
(c) Cost data–Project implementation
The capital cost of the project is estimated to be US$8.85 million. Additional information on project
implementation cost is not yet available.
7. Monitoring and verification of AIJ project activities and results:
|
Item
|
|
|
Party(ies) that will be monitoring project activities
|
Aeroenergía
|
|
Party(ies) that will be externally verifying project results
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Date when the monitoring plan became (or will become) operational (month/year)
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Types of data that will be collected
|
Total fossil fuel use for the generation of electricity, by fuel type
|
|
Description of Monitoring and Verification Activities and Schedule for Implementation
|
|
The Costa Rican Ministry of the Environment and Energy (MINAE–formerly MIRENEM), through
its Office of Energy Policy (DSE), will make available, on an annual basis, data on Costa
Rica’s total fossil fuel use for the generation of electricity in the previous year. This
information will be published within the first six months of each year. Aeroenergía, using
conversion tables supplied by MINAE, will convert the DSE-supplied information to develop a total
and accurate greenhouse gas displacement profile for the project.
Monitoring will take place on a regular and constant basis in accordance with the
Aeroenergía Power Purchasing agreement with ICE. Aeroenergía will develop offset
information annually by September, with technical assistance and data from MINAE and ICE.
The participants in this project agree to independent, external verification of the information
presented in this proposal, excluding confidential business information. The participants welcome
inspection by members of the Panel or qualified third-parties, to review the appropriateness of
any procedures or methodologies utilized to determine GHG emission reductions.
|
B. Governmental approval
|
Item
|
|
|
Please check one of the following.
|
This report is a first report.
or
This report is an intermediate report.
or
This report is a final report.
|
|
Please check one of the following:
|
This report is a joint report. Letter(s) of approval of this
report from the designated national authority of the other Party(ies) involved in the activity
is(are) attached in Section J, Annex.
or
This report is a separate report.
|
|
Additional comments (if any):
|
|
-
Compatibility with, and supportiveness of, national economic development and socioeconomic and
environmental priorities and strategies
|
Compatibility with Economic Development and Socioeconomic and Environmental Priorities
|
|
The ICE anticipates shortfalls in its ability to meet the demand for electricity as early as
1996. Because wind facilities can be constructed quickly, the project could be on line in time to
help meet these shortfalls. In addition, according to René Castro Salazar, Minister of
MINAE, "the Government of Costa Rica considers this project a good candidate for joint
implementation because it fulfills the following standards: local support for the project;
environmental, financial, technical, and institutional feasibility; contribution to national
sustainable development priorities; [and] consistency with existing Costa Rican laws and
regulations."
|
D. Environmental, social/cultural, and economic impacts of the AIJ project
|
Non-Greenhouse-Gas Environmental Impacts of the Project
|
|
By displacing fossil fuel combustion, the project will reduce non-GHG local air pollutants, which
will help to improve overall local and regional air quality.
Neither flora nor fauna in the area is expected to be adversely impacted by the construction or
operation of the project. Road construction will not significantly affect the landscape. The
project zone is not a route for migratory birds, nor a habitat for raptors, and therefore the
risk of birds getting caught in the wind turbines is substantially reduced.
|
|
Social/Cultural Impacts of the Project
|
|
Residential patterns in the area are mainly dispersed houses in rural settings. No cultural
remains or archeological structures are believed to be on the site.
|
|
Economic Impacts of the Project
|
|
The construction, operation, and maintenance of the facility will create jobs for Costa Ricans.
The local economy will also benefit from improved roads and electricity transmission facilities.
In addition, the project will help Costa Rica meet its growing demand for electricity.
|
E. Greenhouse gas impacts of the AIJ project
1. Scenario description
|
Item
|
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
1 of 1
|
|
Site name/designation
|
Aeroenergía S.A. Wind Facility
|
|
Project sector
|
Energy
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Electricity generation from fossil fuels
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
Thermal units in Costa Rica were originally designed to meet only peak demand, while
hydroelectric systems were intended to meet base load demand (hydroelectric is preferred because
it is half the cost of thermal generation). However, decreased reliability of hydroelectric
plants resulting from El Niño drought conditions has forced ICE to rely more heavily on
thermal units to meet base load demand. At the same time, energy demand in Costa Rica is growing
at a rate of 7 to 9 percent annually. This rapid growth has put pressure on ICE to continue to
expand its current capacity. In September 1994, the Minister of MINAE announced the goal to meet
all electricity needs in Costa Rica with renewable energy sources by 2001. While this goal is
intended to fulfill commitments under the Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC), the
Biodiversity Convention, and Agenda 21, current energy demand and supply conditions suggest that
such a phase-out may be delayed.
In light of ambiguities created by drought and potential conflicts between policy goals and
actual utility expansion plans, the proposal provides a broad picture of future GHG emissions in
Costa Rica by presenting two sets of reference case projections: one developed by ICE and USAID
in 1992, and an "alternative" projection incorporating 1994 fossil fuel consumption
data and the September 1994 Costa Rican government policy goals to phase out fossil fuels. The
"alternative" reference scenario is presented in this report simply because it leads to
a lower estimate of net project benefits and, hence, is more conservative. The
"alternative" reference scenario is based on the assumption that consumption of diesel
and fuel oil for the electricity generation in Costa Rica will remain at 1994 levels through 1997
and then decline to zero by 2001.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Alternative energy generation (wind)
|
|
Description:
The project site is located in a rural area, where the terrain consists of open fields and smooth
ridgelines used primarily for cattle-grazing. Construction of a 6.4 MW wind facility at the site
began in September 1996 and was completed in May 1997, at which time the plant became fully
operational. The facility is expected to have a functional lifetime of at least 21 years. The
project will offset electricity that would otherwise have been generated by existing thermal
plants, thereby reducing GHG emissions from fossil fuel combustion. However, emissions in the
project scenario occur only until 2001 because all fossil fuel-based generation is expected to be
replaced by renewable energy resources by that year.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Description:
This information is not yet available.
|
2. GHG emission/sequestration calculation methodology:
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
1 of 1
|
|
Project sector
|
Energy
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
Using 1994 fossil fuel consumption data as a benchmark and the fossil fuel phase-out plan, the
proposal generates an alternative reference scenario projection in which emissions fall to zero
over the period from 1997 to 2001. The reference scenario is based on emissions from the
consumption of diesel and #6 fuel oil used to power Costa Rica's fossil fuel generating
plants. According to data provided to the project developer by MINAE, during 1994, these fossil
fuel plants generated 829.8 GWh and emitted 861,843 t CO2. From this can be derived a
1994 national emissions factor for fossil fuel plants of 1039 t CO2/GWh (861,843 t
CO2/829.8 GWh).
The proposal assumes that consumption of diesel and fuel oil will remain at 1994 levels until
1997. Based on the MINAE Minister's announced goal to phase out fossil fuel by 2001, fossil
fuel consumption is expected to decline beginning in 1998 until it is totally eliminated by 2001.
As the phase-out plan is implemented, emissions from fossil fuel consumption are expected to be
reduced approximately 44 percent by 1998, 86 percent by 1999, 98.5 percent by 2000, and 100
percent by 2001. Note that reference scenario emissions for year 1 are estimated as 4/12 of 1994
levels because year 1 is defined as September to December 1996.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
Because there are no emissions associated with wind energy electricity generation, emissions in
the project scenario represent Costa Rican fossil fuel electricity generation that is not
displaced by the project's generation. The estimation methodology calculates the displaced
generation (i.e., net project benefits), not the remaining generation.
Net project benefits are the avoided emissions from displaced fossil fuel generation. Since the
project facility will not be operational until May 1997, no net project benefits accrue in 1996.
Beginning in 1997, net project benefits in a given year are estimated as the ratio of the
plant's projected electricity generation (27 GWh) to annual fossil fuel electricity
generation in Costa Rica for 1994 (829.8 GWh), multiplied by total projected emissions in a given
year. Emission reductions, therefore, decline annually until they reach zero in 2001 (based on
annual percentage decreases in fossil fuel use anticipated with the total phase-out of fossil
fuel plants). By calculating an annual reduction in net project carbon benefits based on the
phase-out of fossil fuels, the project attempts to avoid double-counting emission reductions that
may be claimed by other wind energy or hydroelectric projects in Costa Rica. Net project benefits
between 1997 and 2010 are calculated as follows:
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario (continued)
|
|
Year 1 (1996) (0 GWh/829.8 GWh)(861,843 t CO2)
Year 2 (1997) (27 GWh / 829.8 GWh)(861,843 t CO2) * 7/12
Year 3 (1998) (27 GWh / 829.8 GWh)(479,002 t CO2)
Year 4 (1999) (27 GWh / 829.8 GWh)(117,936 t CO2)
Year 5 (2000) (27 GWh / 829.8 GWh)(12,701 t CO2)
Years 6 - 20 (27 GWh / 829.8 GWh)(0 t CO2)
(2001-2010)
Emissions reductions for 1997 have been pro-rated to reflect the date at which the facility came
on-line (late May, 1997). Annual project scenario emissions are calculated by subtracting annual
net project benefits from annual reference scenario emissions.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
3. GHG emission/sequestration data:
(a) Reporting of GHG emissions/sequestration
(b) Additional information on GHG emissions/sequestration
|
Indirect or Secondary GHG Impacts (Positive and Negative)
|
|
None identified.
|
|
Factors That Could Cause the Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Strategy for Reducing the Risk of Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
Because project benefits accrue only through the year 2000 and are extremely conservative given
historical increases in fossil fuel consumption, the risk of loss or reversal of GHG benefits is
very low.
|
F. Funding of the AIJ project
1. Identification of funding sources:
(a) Funding sources for project development
This information is not yet available.
(b) Funding sources for project implementation
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount ($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding (%)
|
Is This Funding Assured? (Y/N)
|
|
CABEI Central American Economic Integration Bank
|
Costa Rica
|
6,975,000
|
75
|
|
|
Aeroenergía Partners
|
Costa Rica
|
2,325,000
|
25
|
|
|
Total
|
|
9,300,000
|
100
|
|
2. Assessment of additional funding needs:
|
Current or Planned Activities to Obtain Additional Funding
|
|
None.
|
G. Contribution to capacity building and technology transfer
|
Contribution to Capacity Building and Technology Transfer
|
|
The project also contributes to capacity building by expanding the application of renewable
energy technologies, thereby reducing the reliance on fossil fuels.
|
H. Recent developments, technical difficulties, and obstacles encountered
|
Recent Project Developments
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Technical Difficulties and Other Obstacles Encountered
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
I. Additional information
|
Additional Information
|
|
None.
|
J. Annex
1. Host country acceptance of the AIJ project:
|
Country/Project Title
|
Name, Title, and Government Agency
of the Designated
National Authority
|
Date of Approval
(day/month/year)
|
|
Costa Rica/Aeroenergía S.A. Wind Facility
|
René Castro Salazar, Minister, Ministry of Natural Resources, Energy and Mines
|
26 July 1995
|
2. Letters of approval of this AIJ project report:
As demonstrated by the attached form, the host country concurred with the 1997 USIJI Reporting Document for
this project. In accordance with instructions from the UNFCCC Secretariat, a new letter of host country
concurrence is not required for the 1998 USIJI Reporting Document for this project because the lead
developer reported no new information this year and the Reporting Document has not changed.
|
|