NEGOTIATIONS
FOCUS
PROCESS
KEY STEPS
|
|
Your location: Home |
|
|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
|
Uniform Reporting Format:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
List of
Projects
A. Description of the AIJ project
1. Title of project: Noel Kempff Mercado Climate Action Project
2. Host country: Bolivia
3. Brief project description:
The Noel Kempff Mercado Climate Action Project is a forest protection and sustainable management project
located in eastern Bolivia. The project has expanded the existing Noel Kempff Mercado National Park, and
will reduce future GHG emissions within both the existing Park and the Park expansion area, by eliminating
legal and illegal logging activities (Component A). The project also will sequester carbon over time
through the long-term protection and regeneration of the Park expansion area’s already logged
mahogany, oak, cedar, and palm forests, and through a mix of income-generating activities designed to
support long-term preservation (Component B). Finally, GHG mitigation will also result from leakage
prevention activities (Component C). Although GHG emission reductions and carbon sequestration are
anticipated to occur within both the existing Park and the Park expansion area, the project will only claim
GHG benefits associated with activities within the Park expansion area.
4. Participants:
|
Name of Organization or Individual
|
Country
|
|
Government of Bolivia (GOB)
|
Bolivia
|
|
Fundación Amigos de la Naturaleza (FAN)
|
Bolivia
|
|
The Nature Conservancy (TNC)
|
U.S.A.
|
|
American Electric Power System (AEP)
|
U.S.A.
|
|
PacifiCorp
|
U.S.A.
|
|
British Petroleum America (BP America)
|
U.K.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)Or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Gobierno de Bolivia
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Government of Bolivia
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
GDB
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
GOB
|
|
Department
|
Ministry of Sustainable Development and Planning
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
|
|
Street
|
|
|
City
|
La Paz
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Bolivia
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Reyes Villa
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Erick
|
|
Job title
|
Minister of Sustainable Development and Planning
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Roca
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Neisa
|
|
Job title
|
Vice Minister of Sustainable Development and Environment
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Fundación Amigos de la Naturaleza
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Friends of Nature Foundation
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
FAN
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
None
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project administration, project development
|
|
Street
|
Av. Irala 673, Casilla 2241
|
|
City
|
Santa Cruz de la Sierra
|
|
State
|
Santa Cruz
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Bolivia
|
|
Telephone
|
011-591-3-329-717
|
|
Fax
|
011-591-3-329-692
|
|
E-mail
|
Fan@fan.scbbs-bo.com
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Justiniano
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Hermes
|
|
Job title
|
Executive Director
|
|
Direct telephone
|
011-591-3-329-717
|
|
Direct fax
|
011-591-3-329-692
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
Justinianoh@fan.scbbs-bo.com
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Moreno
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Adolfo
|
|
Job title
|
Head of Conservation Department
|
|
Direct telephone
|
011-591-3-329-717
|
|
Direct fax
|
011-591-3-329-692
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
Amoreno@fan.scbbs-bo.com
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
The Nature Conservancy
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
TNC
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project development, technical assistance, funds management
|
|
Street
|
1815 N. Lynn Street
|
|
City
|
Arlington
|
|
State
|
Virginia
|
|
Post code
|
22209
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
703-841-5300
|
|
Fax
|
703-841-4880
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
http://www.tnc.org
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Sawhill
|
|
First name, middle name
|
John C.
|
|
Job title
|
President and CEO
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Nelson
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Tia
|
|
Job title
|
Senior Policy Advisor
|
|
Direct telephone
|
703-841-5372
|
|
Direct fax
|
703-841-7400
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
tnelson@tnc.org
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
American Electric Power System
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
AEP
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Financing
|
|
Street
|
1 Riverside Plaza
|
|
City
|
Columbus
|
|
State
|
Ohio
|
|
Post code
|
43215-2373
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Draper, Jr.
|
|
First name, middle name
|
E. Linn
|
|
Job title
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of American Electric Power Company,
Inc. and American Electric Power Service Corporation
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Heydlauff
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Dale E.
|
|
Job title
|
Vice President, Environmental Affairs, American Electric Power Service Corporation
|
|
Direct telephone
|
614-223-1280
|
|
Direct fax
|
614-223-2121
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
dale_heydlauff@aep.com
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
PacifiCorp
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
None
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Financing
|
|
Street
|
825 NE Nultnomah, Suite 410
|
|
City
|
Portland
|
|
State
|
Oregon
|
|
Post code
|
97232-2155
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Edmonds
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Bill
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
503-464-5773
|
|
Direct fax
|
503-275-2650
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
(Same as above)
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
British Petroleum America
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
BP America
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Financing
|
|
Street
|
200 Public Square- 40-3555-L
|
|
City
|
Cleveland
|
|
State
|
Ohio
|
|
Post code
|
44114-2375
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
McCrodden
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Bruce
|
|
Job title
|
Vice President — External Affairs
|
|
Direct telephone
|
216-586-5322
|
|
Direct fax
|
216-586-6957
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
5. Description of AIJ project activities
|
Item
|
|
|
Type of Project
|
|
Sector(s)
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Forest preservation, reforestation, park expansion, and sustainable forest product enterprise
development
|
|
Project Location
|
|
Country
|
Bolivia
|
|
Exact location (city, state, region)
|
Province of Velasco, the eastern-most province of the Department of Santa Cruz
|
|
Key Dates and Current Stage of Project
|
|
Project starting date (month/year)
|
1997
|
|
Project ending date (month/year)
|
2026
|
|
Project lifetime (years)
|
30
|
|
Current stage of project
|
In progress
|
|
General Project Description and Technical Data
|
|
The project has three GHG mitigation components.
Component A of the project will involve the following activities: (1) completing the process of
indemnifying and retiring logging concessions on 634,287 hectares (ha) of tropical forest located
adjacent to the Noel Kempff Mercado National Park, (2) expanding the boundaries of the Park by
842,095 ha, which includes the 634,287 ha of newly indemnified concession area, (3) establishing a
short-term protection plan for the Park expansion area, and (4) establishing the legal framework
necessary for implementation of Component B.
Component B of the project will preserve and protect the carbon sequestered on the 1,523,466 ha of
the expanded Park over 30 years. To ensure the long-term protection of the expanded Park, the
project will establish a mix of income generating activities, including: (1) establishing a Park
protection endowment fund, (2) generating profit from a new genetic resources enterprise, and (3)
constructing the infrastructure necessary to support a model eco-tourism program within the Park.
Component C of the project will mitigate GHG emissions in secondary areas beyond the boundaries of
the expanded Park. This Component is designed to ensure that the net GHG mitigation achieved
through Component A and B activities are protected from significant leakages. This Component will
provide alternative, environmentally-sustainable economic opportunities for the local population,
and technical assistance to the indemnified concessionaires to implement sustainable forest
management practices.
In addition to the GHG mitigation components discussed above, the project involves some general
measures, which fall under Component G of the project. This Component will establish a
comprehensive and verifiable GHG monitoring, record keeping, and reporting regime for the project.
In addition, Component G will designate a portion of overall project funds to cover the
administrative costs incurred by the Government of Bolivia to review and oversee project activities
over the lifetime of the project.
Although GHG emission reductions and carbon sequestration are anticipated to occur within both the
existing Park and the Park expansion area, the project will only claim GHG benefits associated with
activities within the Park expansion area.
|
6. Cost
(a) Explanation of methodology for calculating cost data
|
Methodology for Calculating Cost Data
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
(b) Cost data–Project development
This information is not yet available.
(c) Cost data–Project implementation
Project implementation costs are anticipated to be US$9.5 million. Annual implementation cost information
is not yet available.
Itemized Project Implementation Costs
7. Monitoring and verification of AIJ project activities and results
|
Item
|
|
|
Party(ies) that will be monitoring project activities
|
FAN and the Project Implementation Team (to be appointed by the participants).
|
|
Party(ies) that will be externally verifying project results
|
This information is not yet available (potentially the Government of Bolivia).
|
|
Date when the monitoring plan became (or will become) operational (month/year)
|
April 1997
|
|
Types of data that will be collected
|
Carbon (C) changes in primary terrestrial pools (aboveground biomass and necromass, belowground
biomass, soils, and the forest floor); tree population structure and growth; changes in land cover,
land-use, and land management; natural disturbances; climate; changes in relevant laws and
policies; and socioeconomic trends and impacts on C sources and sinks.
|
|
Description of Monitoring and Verification Activities and Schedule for Implementation
|
|
The comprehensive draft monitoring and verification plan was developed by May 1997 and
implementation began in 1997 with fieldwork and analysis to establish the baseline. The monitoring
and verification plan includes specifications for: (1) monitoring forest biomass and carbon content
of other forest components; (2) monitoring of secondary impact parameters; (3) establishing and
maintaining monitoring plots; (4) conducting quality assurance tests and quality control
procedures; and (5) developing a summary of the equations that will be used to convert raw data to
CO2-equivalent units.
Monitoring tasks will include: (1) routinely tracking the data elements for C contents, flux rates,
and secondary impacts at three locations within the project area; (2) verifying the assumptions
made to establish the project reference case emissions and secondary impacts projections, and
correcting or improving assumptions, as needed; and (3) comparing the documented changes in total C
and secondary impacts at the three monitoring locations and making necessary adjustments to the
reference case.
|
B. Governmental approval
|
Item
|
|
|
Please check one of the following.
|
This report is a first report.or
This report is an intermediate report.or
This report is a final report.
|
|
Please check one of the following:
|
This report is a joint report. Letter(s) of approval of this report from the designated national
authority of the other Party(ies) involved in the activity is(are) attached in Section J, Annex.or
This report is a separate report.
|
|
Additional comments (if any):
|
|
C. Compatibility with, and supportiveness of, national economic development and socioeconomic and
environmental priorities and strategies
|
Compatibility with Economic Development and Socioeconomic and Environmental Priorities
|
|
The project developers indicate that all aspects of the project have been designed to conform with
the conservation goals of the Bolivian Government, as well as Bolivia’s Popular Participation
and Forestry Laws. Moreover, Component G of the project will provide funding to assist the Bolivian
Government in strengthening its AIJ institutional capacity to further the country’s
sustainable development goals and the GHG mitigation objectives of the UNFCCC.
|
D. Environmental, social/cultural, and economic impacts of the AIJ project
|
Non-Greenhouse-Gas Environmental Impacts of the Project
|
|
The project will protect biodiversity and wildlife habitat, improve water and air quality, and
stabilize the
soil in the expanded Noel Kempff Mercado National Park.
|
|
Social/Cultural Impacts of the Project
|
|
In addition to involving the local communities in Park protection and eco-tourism activities, the
project will introduce a community development program designed to improve the local standards of
living. This program will be implemented in coordination with the local government. The project
will ensure that the expanded Park does not become a development magnet that will increase the
local population to unsustainable levels. Project developers will also work with the local
communities to: secure community property rights; implement sustainable uses of community land;
strengthen community organizations; improve basic health and education services; and establish
environmental education programs.
The project will also help to protect important Guarasug’we cultural vestiges (e.g.,
ceremonial items used in burials) located in the northeastern corner of the Park expansion area.
These vestiges have significant anthropological value to the local cultural heritage. Although the
Guarasug’we people are considered culturally extinct, elements of their culture are still
present in the area.
|
|
Economic Impacts of the Project
|
|
The project will provide new sustainable employment opportunities for the local population in Park
protection, construction, transportation, agroforestry and eco-tourism micro enterprise formation,
and the commercialization of genetic resources. For example, the project will establish a new
venture, Biodiversidad Sustentable (BDS), to commercialize green products. In addition to
generating income for the Park, BDS will provide local employment opportunities. Similarly,
development of the Park’s eco-tourism infrastructure, and training in tourism business
development will provide opportunities to establish eco-tourism micro-enterprises and will assist
the local population in gaining access to investment capital.
|
E. Greenhouse gas impacts of the AIJ project
1. Scenario description
|
Item
|
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
1 of 3
|
|
Site name/designation
|
Component A, Park Expansion Area
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Logging, timber stock depletion
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
The project developers assume that without the project, 296,099 ha of accessible commercial forest
lands within the Park expansion area would be harvested in 29,610 ha blocks each year over a 10
year period. After all blocks have been cut, the proposal assumes that logging activities would
return to the first block, where trees that have reached the legally extractable class would be
harvested. In the original project proposal and in the report submitted to the UN FCCC in 1997, the
project developers assumed that by 2005, harvest intensity would decrease as all timber stocks are
depleted. Developers now anticipate that harvesting activities will decrease from 2007 and onward,
as only younger trees with the minimum harvesting diameter are removed.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Short-term forest preservation and Park expansion
|
|
Description:
Component A of the project is anticipated to complete the process of indemnifying and retiring
logging concessions on 634,287 hectares (ha) of tropical forest located adjacent to the Noel Kempff
Mercado National Park. This estimate is different from the original estimate of 639,056 ha provided
in the project proposal and reported in the report submitted to the UN FCCC in 1997. In addition,
this Component is expected to expand the boundaries of the Park by 842,095 ha to include: (1) the
634,287 ha of newly indemnified concession area, (2) a previously indemnified concession area, (3)
two conservation reserves, and (4) a private land holding. Through the cessation of logging
activities on the 296,099 ha of accessible commercial forestlands within the Park expansion area,
Component A is projected to mitigate GHG emissions that would have occurred in the reference
scenario. A short-term protection plan for the Park expansion area is expected to assure that the
GHG mitigation achieved through the indemnification and Park expansion are preserved (a long-term
conservation and management regime is expected to be established under Component B).
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Short-term forest preservation and Park expansion
|
|
Description:
The project has retired logging concessions within the 296,099 ha of accessible commercial
forestlands within the Park expansion area. In addition, a short-term protection plan has been
initiated to prevent burning and clearing of forest within the expansion area for agricultural use.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
2 of 3
|
|
Site name/designation
|
Component B, Park Expansion Area
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Burning of depleted forest area, conversion to agricultural lands
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
In the absence of the project, the project developers assume that by 2007, the timber stocks
available on the 296,099 ha of accessible commercial forestlands within the Park expansion would be
nearly depleted. Despite lower birth rates, increased migration into the area will fuel increases
in the population surrounding the Park. Population growth coupled with reductions in harvesting
opportunity would lead to gradual small farmer penetration and burning and clearing of forests
within the expansion area for colonization, followed by larger scale mechanized agriculture and
cattle ranching. Already, 375 ha of forestland within the area have been cleared for agricultural
use.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Long-term forest preservation
|
|
Description:
Component B of the project is expected to preserve and protect the carbon sequestered on the
1,523,466 ha of the expanded Park over a period of 30 years. To ensure the long-term protection of
the expanded Park, the project will establish a mix of income generating activities to finance the
long-term protection of the expanded Park. These activities are projected to generate GHG benefits
by: (1) averting conversion of land from forests to agriculture, and (2) assuring the long-term
protection of existing carbon stocks within the Park.
Although the project measures may allow the carbon stored in both forest cover and soil to increase
overtime, the direction and magnitude of these changes are presently unknown. Thus, the project
developers assume that the carbon stocks within the expanded Park are currently in a state of
equilibrium and GHG benefits associated with potential carbon stock increases are not measured.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Long-term forest preservation
|
|
Description:
The project has retired all logging concessions on the 296,099 ha of accessible commercial
forestlands with the Park Expansion area. FAN is working to establish a mix of income generating
activities to finance the long-term protection of the expanded Park.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
3 of 3
|
|
Site name/designation
|
Component C, Sustainable Community Development and Leakage Prevention
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Non-sustainable logging and slash and burn agriculture
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
Without the project, the project developers assume that some members of the community living within
and beyond the Expanded Park boundaries would continued to be employed by timber companies, which
have been identified for indemnification as part of Component A of the project. The project
developers assume that others within the local community would continue to be involved in
non-sustainable slash-and-burn agriculture and the extraction of heart-of-palm within the Park.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Technical assistance and training
|
|
Description:
Component C of the project is anticipated to reduce increases of GHG emissions within and beyond
the boundaries of the expanded Park. This Component is designed to ensure that the net GHG
mitigation achieved through Component A and B activities are protected from significant leakages.
Component C activities include: (1) providing short-term assistance to help local communities that
now depend on logging to transition to alternative, environmentally-sustainable economic
activities; (2) creating opportunities for micro-enterprise development; and (3) providing
technical assistance to the indemnified concessionaires to implement sustainable forest management
practices.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Technical assistance and training
|
|
Description:
Of the four logging concessions retired by the project, three of the concessionaires have gone
bankrupt. Projects funds paid to these concessionaires to cease logging activities on the project
area were used to pay off concessionaires’ debts rather than to relocate logging activities
to other areas. FAN is monitoring the activities of the concessionaire that is still in operation
and plans to provide technical assistance to the concessionaire in sustainable forest management.
|
2. GHG emission/sequestration calculation methodology
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
1 of 3
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
The project developers assume that without the project, 296,099 ha of accessible commercial
forestlands within the Park expansion area would be harvested in 29,610 ha blocks each year over
the next 10 years.
To develop the reference scenario emission estimates for Component A, the project developers first
estimated carbon stocks at the Component A project site. Estimates of carbon stored in above- and
belowground biomass within the Component A project area are based on a baseline inventory conducted
in 1997 using data collected from 625 permanent plots and a general biomass equation for moist
tropical forests (Brown, 1997). The density of above- and belowground biomass was then multiplied
by the standard carbon-to-biomass ratio of 0.5 t C / 1 t dm to convert to tonnes of carbon.
The baseline inventory report estimates total biomass in forest types most likely to be logged
commercially to be 250 t C/ha. The inventory report assumes 5.7 t C/ha of timber will be extracted
during logging. The estimate of biomass extraction is based on data on remaining exploitable land
with commercially attractive timber types in the Expansion area (296,099 ha) and reported
extraction rates (Halloy, S. 1994, Flores and Miranda 1994).
In addition to the 5.7 t C/ha lost due to timber extraction, it is assumed that carbon will be lost
as biomass is destroyed during the extraction process. The estimate of biomass destroyed in the
logging process, 2.8 t C/ha per tonne of timber extracted, was developed from permanent plots
established in a recently logged area adjacent to the expansion zone. Thus, total biomass carbon
lost during logging is estimated to be 21.6 t C/ha (=5.7 t C/ha + (5.7 t C/ha * 2.8 t C/ha). Rather
than take into account the potential for carbon storage in the harvested biomass, and the slow
release of carbon over time as the destroyed and harvested biomass decay, the project developers
assume that the biomass carbon immediately oxidizes.
The project developers assume that the 296,099 ha of accessible commercial forestlands would be
harvested in 29,610 ha blocks each year over the next 10 years. After all blocks have been cut, it
is assumed that logging activities would return to the first block, where trees that have reached
the legally extractable class would be harvested. By 2007, the project developers assume that
harvest intensity would decrease as all timber stocks are depleted. Harvesting activities from 2007
and onward would involve only the removal of younger trees with the minimum harvesting diameter.
To estimate the annual biomass carbon losses associated with logging activities, the project
developers multiplied the annual estimate of biomass carbon lost per hectare (this amount is
highest between 1997 and 2007 due to a greater logging intensity) by the annual amount of hectares
logged. Assuming that 50% of the biomass carbon extracted is recovered at the sawmill and stored in
long-lived products, the project developers estimate carbon losses associated with reference case
logging activity in the Park expansion area over the 30 year project lifetime to be 11,879,804 t C
or 43,559,281 t CO2.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
The project is anticipated to generate carbon benefits by ceasing logging activities in the Park
expansion area (Component A).
Although the project measures may allow the carbon stored in both forest cover and soil to increase
over time, the magnitude of these changes is presently unknown. Thus, the project developers assume
that the carbon stocks at the project site are currently in a state of equilibrium and GHG benefits
associated with potential carbon stock increases are not measured. This is a conservative
assumption that results in an underestimate of benefits.
The quantity of carbon stored as a result of the project is estimated as the difference between
what would have been lost in the reference scenario, and current carbon stocks. Thus, net project
GHG benefits over the 30-year project lifetime are anticipated to be equal to the emissions that
were estimated to occur in the reference scenario, which as indicated are 11,879,804 t C or
43,559,281 t CO2..
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
A GHG inventory was conducted on the project site over a six-month period between May and October
1997. The data gathered during this inventory was used to improve the GHG calculations described
above. Subsequent inventories are planned for future years during the same season.
|
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
2 of 3
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
Once timber stocks are depleted on the 296,099 ha of accessible commercial forest lands, the
developers anticipate gradual small farmer penetration and burning and clearing of forests within
the expansion area for colonization, followed by larger-scale mechanized agriculture and cattle
ranching. Already, 375 ha of forestland within the area have been cleared for agricultural use. The
project developers estimated carbon losses in each major pool (i.e., aboveground biomass,
necromass, soil) due conversion of 13,915 ha of the project to agricultural lands.
Based on population growth data, the project developers estimated the number of hectares cleared
annually for agricultural uses. In addition, the project developers estimated that 203 t C/ha would
be lost due to land conversion. This estimate is based on the assumption that, due to land
conversion of the logged areas, 100% of carbon stored in aboveground biomass (183 t C/ha), 50% of
soil carbon (17 t C/ha), and 90% of necromass (3 t C/ha), will be lost.
To calculate annual carbon losses due to land conversion, the project developers multiplied 203 t
C/ha by the number of hectares estimated to be cleared in a given year. Over the 30-year project
lifetime, the project developers estimate that 2,824,745 t C or 10,357,398 t CO2 would
be emitted as the logged project area was converted to agricultural land.
In the absence of the project, the project developers assume that by 2007, the timber stocks
available on the 296,099 ha of accessible commercial forestlands within the Park expansion would be
nearly depleted. Population growth coupled with reductions in harvesting opportunity would lead to
gradual small farmer penetration and burning and clearing of forests within the expansion area for
colonization and agricultural use.
The developers estimate the amount of N2O-C equivalent emitted as the depleted forest
area is burned and converted to agricultural lands based on the assumption that 183 t C/ha of
aboveground biomass will be lost due to burning. Of this 183 t C/ha emitted, the developers assume
that 28 t N20-C equivalent / ha is released. To calculate annual N2O
emissions due to land forest burning, the project developers multiplied 28 t N20-C
equivalent / ha by the number of hectares estimated to be burned in a given year. Over the 30- year
project lifetime, the project developers estimate 389,620 t N2O-C equivalent or
1,428,607 t N2O-CO2 equivalent would be emitted due to burning of the logged
project area.
Based on the above calculations, the project developers estimate total emissions associated with
burning and clearing of forests within the expansion area, followed by larger scale mechanized
agriculture and cattle ranching, to be 3,214,365 t C, or 11,786,005 t CO2.
The proposal does not estimate NOx, CO, or CH4 emissions released as the
depleted forest area is burned and converted to agricultural lands in the reference scenario.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
The project is expected to preserve and protect the carbon sequestered on the 1,523,466 ha of the
expanded Park over a period of 30 years (Component B). Although the project measures may allow the
carbon stored in both forest cover and soil to increase over time, the magnitude of these changes
is presently unknown. Thus, the project developers assume that the carbon stocks within the
expanded Park are currently in a state of equilibrium and GHG benefits associated with potential
carbon stock increases are not measured. This is a conservative assumption that results in an
underestimate of benefits.
The quantity of carbon stored as a result of the project measures is estimated as the difference
between what would have been lost in the reference scenario, and current carbon stocks. Thus, net
project GHG benefits are anticipated to be equal to the emissions that were estimated to occur in
the reference scenario¾ 3,214,365 t C, or 11,786,005 t CO2.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
A GHG inventory was conducted on the project site over a six-month period between May and October,
1997. The data gathered during this inventory was used to improve the GHG calculations described
above. Subsequent inventories are planned for future years during the same season.
|
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
3 of 3
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
3. GHG emission/sequestration data
(a) Reporting of GHG emissions/sequestration
Annual estimates are still under development. Cumulative GHG benefits associated with the project are
anticipated to be 15,094,169 t C-equivalent or 55,345,286 t CO2-equivalent. This estimate is
based on 53,916,679 t CO2 and 4,608 t N2O (equivalent to 1,428,607 t CO2).
(b) Additional information on GHG emissions/sequestration
|
Indirect or Secondary GHG Impacts (Positive and Negative)
|
|
Increases in GHG emissions in secondary areas (adjacent forest reserve and communities west of the
Park) are expected to occur over time. These increases are not likely to be directly related to the
implementation of the project measures, but instead are expected to result from the expansion of
agricultural activities towards the Park borders, and the expansion of regional timber activities.
However, the project may indirectly affect GHG emissions in the secondary areas if indemnified
concessionaires use the proceeds of the Component A indemnification to expand their operations
elsewhere. The potential for such an impact is limited due to legal and zoning constraints within
the Department of Santa Cruz. In addition, implementation of Component C of the project, which will
provide technical assistance to the indemnified concessionaires to implement sustainable forest
management practices, may reduce these secondary emissions.
|
|
Factors That Could Cause the Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
With the exception of natural disaster, the principle factors that would cause the direct loss of
GHG benefits achieved by the project stem from human activity within the Park boundaries.
|
|
Strategy for Reducing the Risk of Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
FAN will implement a Park management regime to mitigate project risks associated with anthropogenic
impacts and natural occurrences. Under this management regime, FAN will conduct the following
measures to minimize these risks: maintenance and protection of standing biomass, fire control,
Park access control, fire management and ranger training, and management training for operators of
permitted activities.
In addition, Component C of the project is designed to reduce increases of GHG emissions within and
beyond the boundaries of the expanded Park. The activities conducted under Component C are
discussed in Section A.5. and E.1 of this document.
|
F. Funding of the AIJ project
1. Identification of funding sources
(a) Funding sources for project development
This information is not yet available.
(b) Funding sources for project implementation
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount
($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding
(%)
|
Is This Funding Assured? (Y/N)
|
|
TNC/FAN
|
U.S./Bolivia
|
2,500,000
|
26
|
Y
|
|
Industry Partners
|
U.S.
|
7,000,000
|
74
|
Y
|
|
Total
|
|
9,500,000
|
100
|
|
2. Assessment of additional funding needs
|
Current or Planned Activities to Obtain Additional Funding
|
|
The project is fully funded and all project funds are assured.
|
G. Contribution to capacity building and technology transfer
|
Contribution to Capacity Building and Technology Transfer
|
|
Component G of the project will contribute to institutional capacity building by providing funds to
the Government of Bolivia to cover costs associated with project review, approval, and oversight
over the project lifetime. By covering these costs, the project will assist the Government in
obtaining accurate AIJ pilot phase information required to successfully implement an AIJ program
beyond the pilot phase.
In addition, FAN’s research and development work will contribute to Bolivia’s
implementation of a new environmentally sound national approach to germplasm protection and
sustainable utilization. FAN’s work will yield knowledge and expertise that can be
transferred to institutions and local and national producers through existing technology transfer
institutions, such as the Bolivian Sustainable Forestry Project (BOLFOR), and through the
Park’s management activities and community programs.
|
H. Recent developments, technical difficulties, and obstacles encountered
|
Recent Project Developments
|
|
Kenneth MacDicken, from Winrock International, visited Santa Cruz and the Noel Kempff Park
Expansion Area between April 20 and May 11, 1997 and conducted the following activities: (1)
provided training in forest carbon monitoring techniques and global positioning system receiver use
to FAN and other staff who will be involved in project monitoring; (2) collected and analyzed data
for the reference scenario; (3) collected map and vegetation type data for use in designing the
monitoring plan; (4) delivered carbon monitoring equipment purchased in the U.S. to FAN; and (5)
identified initial plot locations using the vegetation map and known road locations.
In addition, Winrock International technical staff conducted a carbon stock inventory over a
six-month period between May and October, 1997. The data collected during this inventory was used
to update the GHG estimates provided in this report.
|
|
Technical Difficulties and Other Obstacles Encountered
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
I. Additional information
|
Additional Information
|
|
None.
|
J. Annex
1. Host country acceptance of the AIJ project
|
Country/Project Title
|
Name, Title, and Government Agency of the Designated National Authority
|
Date of Approval(day/month/year)
|
|
Bolivia/The Noel Kempff Mercado Climate Action Project
|
Dr. Antonio Aranibar Quiroga, Minister, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
|
14 November 1996
|
-
Letters of approval of this AIJ project report
See attached letter of concurrence.
|
|