|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
List of Projects
USIJI Uniform Reporting Document:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
A. Description of the AIJ project
1. Title of project: Project Salicornia: Halophyte Cultivation in Sonora
2. Host country: Mexico
3. Brief project description:
Project Salicornia is Phase I of a two-phase project to cultivate a native halophyte (a salt-tolerant euphorb
plant, Salicornia bigelovii) in a coastal desert region of northwest Mexico. Phase I is designed to research and
demonstrate Salicornia cultivation on 30 hectares of coastal land. The estimated greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits of
the project result from carbon accumulation and storage in the sandy soil. If Phase II is initiated, the cultivated
crop could potentially serve as a valuable source of biomass material and food (cooking oil and fresh vegetable
products), and could generate income for the local population.
4. Participants:
|
Name of Organization or Individual
|
Country
|
|
Genesis, S.A. de C.V. (a subsidiary of PDC)
|
Mexico
|
|
Planetary Design Corporation (PDC)
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Halophyte Enterprises, Inc (HEI— a subsidiary of PDC)
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Salt River Project (SRP)
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Econergy International Corporation (EIC)
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Genesis, S.A. de C.V.
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
None
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Administration
|
|
Street
|
Yañez 116 Norte
|
|
City
|
Hermosillo, Sonora
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
CP 81390
|
|
Country
|
Mexico
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Mota Urbina
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Carlos
|
|
Job title
|
Director General de Genetica y Sistemas de Ingenieria Solar S.A. de C.V.
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Cota Hernández
|
|
First name, middle name
|
C.P.T. Alfonso
|
|
Job title
|
Director Financieró
|
|
Direct telephone
|
52-62-14 5667 or 14 5824
|
|
Direct fax
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Planetary Design Corporation
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
PDC
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Technology development and coordination
|
|
Street
|
4500 North 32nd Street #100
|
|
City
|
Phoenix
|
|
State
|
Arizona
|
|
Post code
|
85018
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
602-912-9887
|
|
Fax
|
602-912-0277
|
|
E-mail
|
planetary1@aol.com
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Hodges
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Roy Malone
|
|
Job title
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
Direct telephone
|
602-912-9887
|
|
Direct fax
|
602-912-0277
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
planetary1@aol.com
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Platt
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Joseph B.
|
|
Job title
|
Ecologist
|
|
Direct telephone
|
602-912-9887
|
|
Direct fax
|
602-912-0277
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
joplatt@aol.com
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Halophyte Enterprises, Inc (a subsidiary of PDC)
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
HEI
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Financing
|
|
Street
|
4500 North 32nd St., Suite 100
|
|
City
|
Phoenix
|
|
State
|
Arizona
|
|
Post code
|
85018
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Murphy
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Daniel M.
|
|
Job title
|
President and CEO
|
|
Direct telephone
|
602-912-9887
|
|
Direct fax
|
602-912-0277
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
planetaryl@aol.com
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Isom
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Loren
|
|
Job title
|
Project support manager
|
|
Direct telephone
|
602-912-9887
|
|
Direct fax
|
602-912-0277
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
planetaryl@aol.com
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Salt River Project
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
SRP
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Financing
|
|
Street
|
P.O. Box 52025, Mail Station PAB #355
|
|
City
|
Phoenix
|
|
State
|
Arizona
|
|
Post code
|
85072-2025
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Brown Maracas
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Kate
|
|
Job title
|
Manager, Environmental Affairs
|
|
Direct telephone
|
602-236-2045
|
|
Direct fax
|
602-236-3407
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
kbmaraca@srp.gov
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
(Same as above)
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Econergy International Corporation
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
EIC
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Technical and financial advisor
|
|
Street
|
1925 K Street, NW Suite 230
|
|
City
|
Washington
|
|
State
|
District of Columbia
|
|
Post code
|
20006
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Ashford
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Michael S.
|
|
Job title
|
Vice President
|
|
Direct telephone
|
202-822-4980
|
|
Direct fax
|
202-822-2986
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
(Same as above)
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
5. Description of AIJ project activities
|
Item
|
|
|
Type of Project
|
|
Sector(s)
|
Agriculture
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Salicornia cultivation and crop management; technical analysis of soil carbon accumulation and commercial
feasibility of Salicornia cultivation
|
|
Project Location
|
|
Country
|
Mexico
|
|
Exact location (city, state, region)
|
About 400 yards from the coast, adjacent to the town of Bahia de Kino (Kino Bay) in Sonora
|
|
Key Dates and Current Stage of Project
|
|
Project starting date (month/year)
|
April 1996
|
|
Project ending date (month/year)
|
October 2055
|
|
Project lifetime (years)
|
59 years, 7 months
|
|
Current stage of project
|
In progress
|
|
General Project Description and Technical Data
|
|
The project is Phase I of a two-phase project to cultivate Salicornia bigelovii in a coastal desert region
of northwest Mexico. Salicornia bigelovii is a native halophyte, which can be irrigated with sea water and
is ideally suited for cultivation in desert or near-desert, coastal regions.
Phase I is designed to research and demonstrate Salicornia cultivation on 30 hectares of coastal land. The
specific measures to reduce GHG emissions associated with Phase I of the project include development of a
cost-effective process to cultivate Salicornia on a commercial basis, and optimization of agronomic methods
for irrigation and harvesting. These measures will increase carbon storage in the soil at the 30 hectare
site. Phase II, which is currently not part of this USIJI project, will develop a fully commercial 50,000
hectare farm to cultivate Salicornia for use in the production and commercial sale of biomass products and
materials. If Phase II is initiated, the cultivated crop could potentially serve as a valuable source of
cooking oil, fresh vegetable products, high-fiber biomass for particle board manufacturing, and biomass for
power generation, and could provide income to the local population.
|
6. Cost
(a) Explanation of methodology for calculating cost data
|
Methodology for Calculating Cost Data
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
(b) Cost data–Project development
This information is not yet available.
(c) Cost data–Project implementation
This information is not yet available.
7. Monitoring and verification of AIJ project activities and results
|
Item
|
|
|
Party(ies) that will be monitoring project activities
|
Genesis and HEI, with technical support from EIC and in coordination with SRP
|
|
Party(ies) that will be externally verifying project results
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Date when the monitoring plan became (or will become) operational (month/year)
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Types of data that will be collected
|
Soil carbon content and density of belowground biomass, annual quantity of biomass harvested, annual
production and carbon content of long-lived products, average decay rate of long-lived products, fossil
fuel consumption
|
|
Description of Monitoring and Verification Activities and Schedule for Implementation
|
|
Monitoring will be conducted by Genesis and HEI with technical support from EIC and in coordination with
SRP. The soil carbon stocks of below-ground biomass will be monitored every 2-3 years over the lifetime of
the project.
Annual biomass harvests will be monitored based on annual project harvest records. Fuel and electricity
consumption used to operate machinery and irrigation pumping will also be monitored.
The proposal states that the participants intend to identify, in consultation with Mexican and U.S.
authorities, appropriate independent entities to conduct external verification. Verification will be
conducted on an annual basis using data collected by the project operators.
|
B. Governmental approval
|
Item
|
|
|
Please check one of the following.
|
This report is a first report.
or
This report is an intermediate report.
or
This report is a final report.
|
|
Please check one of the following:
|
This report is a joint report. Letter(s) of approval of this report from the designated national authority
of the other Party(ies) involved in the activity is(are) attached in Section J, Annex.
or
This report is a separate report.
|
|
Additional comments (if any):
|
|
C. Compatibility with, and supportiveness of, national economic development and socioeconomic and environmental
priorities and strategies
|
Compatibility with Economic Development and Socioeconomic and Environmental Priorities
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
D. Environmental, social/cultural, and economic impacts of the AIJ project
|
Non-Greenhouse-Gas Environmental Impacts of the Project
|
|
Small-scale cultivation on the 30 hectare Phase I project site are unlikely to have significant negative
non-GHG impacts. However, since Phase II will involve large-scale Salicornia production and
commercialization of short- and long-lived biomass products, several activities are underway in Phase I to
evaluate the potential positive and negative impacts associated with Phase II activities.
The use of fertilizers and pesticides may potentially have a negative impact on both terrestrial and marine
coastal wildlife. These issues will be directly addressed by an environmental impacts assessment conducted
in Phase II. Initial data collection and review suggest that the toxic effects of the pesticides and
fertilizers used— carbendazim, diammonium phosphate, and anhydrous ammonia— and risks of
ecological destruction associated with these chemicals, is low. Any negative effects associated with these
pesticides and fertilizers can be minimized by implementing safe usage and storage practices on-site.
Salicornia farming may also negatively impact coastal biodiversity. To prevent the spread of Salicornia
beyond the intended cultivation area, the Salicornia crops will be planted on abandoned agricultural fields
that do not receive water naturally either from waves or storms that come inland from the coast.
Participants are engaged in discussions with The Nature Conservancy and Conservation International to
collect information on possible biodiversity effects of Phase I and II.
Large-scale irrigation of Salicornia could result in saltwater intrusion into freshwater coastal acquifers.
Recognizing this potential negative impact, Phase II project sites have been chosen for their close
proximity to the sea to allow for estuary irrigation directly from the sea or from on-site, saltwater
wells. Test wells will be drilled at each site to identify any possible freshwater acquifers and potential
for salt migration into freshwater resources. Salt migration and water table levels have already been
monitored at the Phase I Kino Bay site, revealing no evidence of saltwater intrusion into freshwater
resources.
The positive non-GHG impacts associated with large-scale halophyte cultivation anticipated in Phase II of
the project include slowing the process of desertification in some areas, possibly offsetting forest
clearing, and removing toxic metals from wastewater. To the extent that Salicornia or other halophyte
products may directly substitute for forest products, project GHG and non-GHG benefits may include
mitigation of clear-cutting forests. However, it may not be possible to accurately quantify these benefits.
|
|
Social/Cultural Impacts of the Project
|
|
There is very little likelihood that the project will have any negative social impacts on the region. Large
tracts of land are now lying fallow because of the lack of adequate freshwater resources needed for
conventional farming. An informal assessment by the University of Arizona’s Environmental Research
Laboratory (ERL) indicates that if Phase II of the project is initiated, unemployed farmers and displaced
fisherman are likely to benefit from employment opportunities in halophyte farming.
|
|
Economic Impacts of the Project
|
|
Most of the regional agricultural development over the last 30 to 50 years has depleted freshwater supplies
and caused saltwater intrusion into deep wells. In many cases, the Government of Mexico has relocated
segments of the agriculturally dependent population, and provided new wells for irrigation. With these new
wells, irrigation costs are about $10,000 per hectare. To the extent that halophyte farming can take hold
in the region, irrigation costs will fall to approximately $3,000 per hectare.
|
E. Greenhouse gas impacts of the AIJ project
1. Scenario description
|
Item
|
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
1 of 1
|
|
Site name/designation
|
Phase I
|
|
Project sector
|
Agriculture
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
None (idle, unproductive desert land)
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
The project developers assume that in the Phase I reference scenario, the project area would remain as
unused and unproductive desert land without significant vegetation or soil carbon. The University of
Arizona’s Environmental Research Laboratory has extensively tested the soil at the project site to
verify soil carbon stocks prior to Salicornia cultivation.
Although Phase II has not been initiated and is not considered part of the USIJI project, the project
developers have begun to collect data and information to develop the Phase II reference scenario and
emission projections.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Salicornia cultivation and crop management; technical analysis of soil carbon accumulation and commercial
feasibility of Salicornia cultivation
|
|
Description:
The 30 hectare project site was chosen because it is ready for operation, and represents a manageable plot
in which to research and demonstrate Salicornia cultivation. The Phase I project scenario is based on the
assumption that the Salicornia crop will result in the accumulation of soil carbon. Since the project area
will be harvested annually, the project developers assume there will be almost no carbon accumulation in
above-ground biomass. In addition, since the production of long-term biomass products will not occur until
Phase II of the project, the project scenario for Phase I does not include carbon benefits associated with
carbon storage in long-lived products.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Description:
This information is not yet available.
|
2. GHG emission/sequestration calculation methodology
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
1 of 1
|
|
Project sector
|
Agriculture
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
The project developers estimate that zero carbon is stored on the project area in the reference scenario.
In the absence of the project, it is assumed that the project area would remain without significant
vegetation or soil carbon.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
During Phase I, the project developers anticipate that soil carbon will accumulate over the 60-year project
lifetime. The project developers estimate that over 100 years, the project area would reach a steady-state
value of 22 short tons C/acre. This is equal to 49.317 metric tonnes C/hectare (= 22 short tons C/acre *
0.9072 metric tonnes/1 short ton * 1 acre/0.4047 hectares). Since the project area is 30 hectares, soil
carbon accumulation on the entire project area is estimated to be 1,479.5 metric tonnes C (= 49.317 t C/ha
* 30 ha). To convert to units of CO2 (i.e., on a full molecular weight basis), this value was
multiplied by the ratio of 44 t CO2/12 t C. Thus, the cumulative amount of CO2
sequestered over 100 years would be approximately 5,425 t CO2 (=1,479.496 t C * 44 t
CO2/12 t C). To estimate CO2 sequestered over the 60-year project lifetime, 5,425 t
CO2 was multiplied by 0.6. As a result, the estimate of CO2 sequestered by the
project is 3,255 metric tonnes CO2.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
3. GHG emission/sequestration data
(a) Reporting of GHG emissions/sequestration
Information on annual GHG emissions is not yet available. Cumulative GHG benefits associated with Phase I of the
project are anticipated to be 3,255 t CO2.
(b) Additional information on GHG emissions/sequestration
|
Indirect or Secondary GHG Impacts (Positive and Negative)
|
|
Energy consumption for irrigation during Phase I of the project will result in secondary carbon dioxide
emissions of approximately 0.84 t C/ha-yr. Initial energy efficiency improvements planned for Phase I are
expected to reduce annual secondary emissions from energy consumption to about 0.70 t C/ha-yr. These
secondary emissions are still high compared to emissions from energy consumption associated with
conventional farming, which are about 0.15 - 0.2 t C/ha-yr. Additional investments in energy efficiency
will occur in Phase II, when such investments will be more cost-effective. With Phase II energy efficiency
improvements, emissions from energy consumption for irrigation are anticipated to fall to 0.28 t C/ha-yr.
|
|
Factors That Could Cause the Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
Factors that could cause anticipated GHG benefits to be lost or reversed in the future include crop failure
and extreme natural events.
In addition, at the conclusion of Phase I, if it is determined that the project does not demonstrate a
viable opportunity for large-scale halophyte cultivation, Phase II will not be initiated and project soil
carbon benefits will be lost at a rate of 0.5 percent per year.
|
|
Strategy for Reducing the Risk of Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
F. Funding of the AIJ project
1. Identification of funding sources
(a) Funding sources for project development
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount
($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding
(%)
|
|
SRP (carbon research and feasibility study)
|
U.S.A.
|
500,000
|
|
|
University of Arizona’s Environmental Research Laboratory (ERL)
|
U.S.A.
|
|
|
|
EPRI
|
U.S.A.
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
(b) Funding sources for project implementation
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount
($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding(%)
|
Is This Funding Assured? (Y/N)
|
|
Genesis, S.A. de C.V.
|
Mexico
|
|
|
Y
|
|
HEI
|
U.S.A.
|
|
|
Y
|
|
PDC
|
U.S.A.
|
|
|
Y
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
|
2. Assessment of additional funding needs
|
Current or Planned Activities to Obtain Additional Funding
|
|
No additional funds are required for Phase I.
|
G. Contribution to capacity building and technology transfer
|
Contribution to Capacity Building and Technology Transfer
|
|
The project will introduce a new agricultural crop on what is now unused desert land. In addition, the
project will research and demonstrate Salicornia cultivation and crop management techniques, which are not
widely practiced in the region.
|
H. Recent developments, technical difficulties, and obstacles encountered
|
Recent Project Developments
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Technical Difficulties and Other Obstacles Encountered
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
I. Additional information
|
Additional Information
|
|
None.
|
J. Annex
1. Host country acceptance of the AIJ project
|
Country/Project Title
|
Name, Title, and Government Agency of the Designated National Authority
|
Date of Approval(day/month/year)
|
|
Mexico/Project Salicornia: Halophyte Cultivation
|
Carlos Gay, Coordinator of the Unit for International Cooperation and Agreement, National Ecology Institute
(INE), Secretariat of the Environment, Natural Resources and Fisheries (SEMARNAP)
|
3 December 1996
|
2. Letters of approval of this AIJ project report
See attached letter of concurrence.
|