Annex I
UNIFORM REPORTING FORMAT:
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY UNDER THE PILOT PHASE
List of
Projects
A. Description of project
1) Title of project:
New boiler plant in Ignalina, Lithuania.
2) Participants/actors:
|
Item
|
Financier/Reporter
|
Co-reporter
|
|
Name of organisation(a):
|
Statens Energimyndighet
|
Aplinkos Aosaugos Ministerija
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Swedish National Energy Administration
|
Ministry of Environment
|
|
Department:
|
Division for Eastern Europe- EAES Programme
|
Dept. For Environmental Quality
|
|
Acronym:
|
SNEA
|
AAM
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
SNEA
|
EPM
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Assigned by the Swedish Government for Implementation including financing arrangements.
|
Assigned by the Lithuanian Government for activities implemented jointly
|
|
Street:
|
Liljeholmsvägen 32
|
A. Jaksto 4/9
|
|
Post code:
|
S-117 86
|
LT-2694
|
|
City:
|
Stockholm
|
Vilnius
|
|
Country:
|
Sweden
|
Lithuania
|
|
Telephone:
|
+46-8-681 96 07
|
+370-2 610 558
|
|
Fax:
|
+46-8-681 96 67
|
+370-2-220 847
|
|
E-mail:
|
gudrun.knutsson@stem.se
|
atm@nt.gamta.lt
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.stem.se
|
http://www.gamta.lt
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Westermark
|
Bilkis
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Sune
|
Mindaugas
|
|
Job title:
|
senior officer
|
Director of Environmental Quality Dept.
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+46-8-681 95 39
|
+370-2-61 90 49
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+46-8-681 96 67
|
+370-2-220 847
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
sune.westermark@stem.se
|
atm@nt.gamta.lt
|
|
Borrower
|
|
Name of organisation(a):
|
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Joint Stock Company Vilniaus silumos tinklai,
|
|
Department:
|
Affiliate Ignalinos silumos tinklai
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
SPAB VST
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Borrower
|
|
Street:
|
Dariaus ir Gireno 65
|
|
Post code:
|
2038
|
|
City:
|
Vilnius
|
|
Country:
|
Lithuania
|
|
Telephone:
|
+370 2 63 25 20
|
|
Fax:
|
+370 2 26 44 61
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
|
|
Surname:
|
BURBULIS
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
JONAS
|
|
Job title:
|
Deputy Director
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+370 2 63 25 20
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+370 2 26 44 61
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
|
ÅF Energikonsult Syd AB
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Lithuanian Energy Institute
|
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Project evaluator
|
Technical support
|
|
Street:
|
Breslaujos 3
|
Stensjögatan 3
|
|
Post code:
|
LT 3035
|
S-217 65
|
|
City:
|
Kaunas
|
MALMÖ
|
|
Country:
|
Lithuania
|
SWEDEN
|
|
Telephone:
|
+370-7- 75 34 95
|
+46-40-37 50 00
|
|
Fax:
|
+370-7- 35 12 71
|
+46-40-13 03 69
|
|
E-mail:
|
vilemas@isag.lei.lt
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
http://www.af.se
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Pedisius
|
Mårtensson
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Antanas
|
Roland
|
|
Job title:
|
Professor
|
project leader
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+370-7-75 34 95
|
+46-40-37 51 04
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+370-7-35 12 71
|
+46-40-13 03 69
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
vilemas@isag.lei.lt
|
|
|
|
|
a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc.
involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency
closely following the activity.
3) Activity:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Ignalina, located in the north east part of Lithuania it is a city with 7,500 inhabitants.
The idea is to concentrate the heat produc-tion to one new boiler house already built and to close
two old boiler houses. A wood fired boiler is proposed to be installed.
The distribution networks need to be inter-connected and new substations must be installed The
annual energy production is 36,000 MWh. Heating is produced by 40% light oil and 60 % heavy oil (
mazut ).
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Renewable energy
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region,
state):
|
Ignalina Town
Utena Region
Lithuania
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1998-01-21 (Letter of intent)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
Loan expire date 2008-07
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Ongoing
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
25 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
The new boiler will be designed for 5 -8 MW Mazout will still be used in the boiler house for peak
load and as reserve capacity. It will include i.a. firing equipment,
a basic fuel storage on ground (asphalt), fuel conveyor, flue gas cleaner (cyclone), civil works,
buildings, control equipment, commissioning, training etc. A new pre-insulated pipeline is going to
be installed to connect the networks as well as 30 new substations in buildings and block central.
Annual heat after the new project is assumed to be provided with 25,000 MWh biofuels and 10,000 MWh
mazout. 1,000 Mwh is assumed to be saved by the new substations. The emissions are calculated from
the ultimate analysis of the assumed fuels.
|
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency;
renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation;
fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data
requirements are.
Heat production plants (bio fuel)
|
25 years
|
New installation of all main equipment parts (fuel handling system, firing equipment and boiler)
and modernisation of secondary equipment.
|
|
15 years
|
Conversion of existing boiler but new installation fuel handling system and firing equipment.
Modernisation of secondary equipment.
|
|
10 years
|
Limited installation of new equipment (only one part of the three main parts, normally the firing
equipment). Modernisation of other equipment.
|
Heat distribution systems and sub-stations
|
25 years
|
Pre-fabricated pipes including western installation supervision
|
|
15 years
|
Pre-fabricated pipes including local installation supervision
|
|
10 years
|
Modernisation of existing pipes.
|
-
Cost (to the extent possible):
The cost analysis is based on a model developed within the framework of an expert group set up by the
Nordic Council of Ministers and presented in the report TemaNord:564. The calculations include:
1. How would the CO2 emissions have developed without the investment from the investor country,
i.e. determination of a reference alternative.
2. The investment cost of the project.
3. Differences in operation costs before and after the investment.
4. Changes in other economic conditions, e-g- reduction of other environmentally damaging emissions.
5. The time before the project would have been implemented anyhow, or the economic lifetime of the project
if it is reasonable to expect that the project alternatively would not have been implemented within the
period in question.
The more detailed calculations are found in the table enclosed as the last page to this project report.
|
Swedish National Energy Administration's costs
|
|
NPV(Swedish net costs)/
|
2,64
|
US$/ton
|
defined as NPV of costs for NUTEK/SNEA
|
|
Emission Reduction comp. base-line
|
|
per tonne of CO2 saved compared to baseline scenario during the project's economic
life
|
|
recipient's costs
|
|
NPV(recipient's net costs)/
|
-16,72
|
US$/ton
|
defined as NPV of costs for recipient's action - baseline case
|
|
Emission Reduction comp. base-line
|
(NOTE! negative value is profit)
|
per tonne of CO2 saved compared to baseline scenario during the project's economic
life
|
|
recipient country's economic costs
|
|
NPV(recipient country's economic costs) /
|
0,00
|
US$/ton
|
defined as NPV of costs for recipient country's action case - baseline case
|
|
Emission Reduction comp. base-line
|
(NOTE! negative value is profit)
|
per tonne of CO2 saved compared to baseline scenario during the project's economic
life
|
|
total costs in recipient country
|
|
NPV(recipient country's total costs) /
|
-16,72
|
US$/ton
|
defined as NPV of costs for recipient's and recipient country's action case - baseline
|
|
Emission Reduction comp. base-line
|
(NOTE! negative value is profit)
|
per tonne of CO2 saved compared to baseline scenario during the project's economic
life
|
|
Overall costs
|
|
NPV(all costs)/
|
-14,08
|
US$/ton
|
defined as NPV of all costs for SNEA, recipient, and recipient country's action case - baseline
case
|
|
Emission Reduction comp. base-line
|
(NOTE! negative value is profit)
|
per tonne of CO2 saved compared to baseline scenario during the project's economic
life
|
5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involveda):
|
|
It is from teh Swedish side intended that upon agreement with a central Lithuanian authority on
reporting of JI-projects, this authority will assign a local organisation, which will be involved
in the evaluation of the climate effects of this project. After an initial work in cooperation with
SNEA’s assigned consultant, this local organisation would take the main responsibility the
continued measuring for JI-reporting.
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations mentioned is reported under
section A.2 above.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance,
approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be
shown as follows:
(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one
participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached
letters issued by the relevant national authorities;
(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national
authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been
received from all participating Parties.
1) For the activity:
First report.
2) This report is a joint report:
3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
cf. Annex II, section B
-
Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio economic and
environment priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national
economic development and socio economic and environment priorities and strategies
|
|
The following objectives in the Lithuanian energy sector:
- to reduce the energy intensity;
- to create and improve energy infrastructure based on indigenous energy resources;
- to utilise the existing energy production capacity efficiently
- to develop co-operation between Baltic, Nordic and other Central European countries
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
Annual emissions reduction
7,990 ton CO2
88 ton SO2
3.5 ton Nox
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
No
|
|
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:
|
More stable energy supply.
Improved working conditions, increased motivation.
The boiler plant can use the waste from sawmills in neighbourhood. Wood fuel production will start
and give more people work locally.
Improved trade balance.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?
|
No
|
|
Describe economic benefits in detail:
|
Decreased fuel costs approx. 4 USD/MWh
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?
|
No
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real,
measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not
have occurred in the absence of such activities
-
Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
Two years the mixed fuel would have been used. After two years mazout would have been chosen as main fuel.
Annual heat would have been provided with 22,000 MWh mazout and 14,000 MWh light oil.
The baseline emissions of CO2 during 15 years is calculated to 116820 tons.
2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
Annual heat after the new project is assumed to be provided with 25,000 MWh biofuels and 10,000 MWh mazout.
1,000 Mwh is assumed to be saved by the new substations. The emissions are calculated from the ultimate
analysis of the assumed fuels.
The emissions are calculated from the ultimate analysis of the assumed fuel mentioned in above baseline.
Fill in the following tables as applicable:
Summary table: Projected emission reductions:
|
GHG
|
Year 0
=1997
|
Year 1
=1998*
|
Year 2
=1999
|
Year 3
=2000
|
Year 15
|
|
Planned energy production MWh/year
on biofuels
Mazout / light-oil
|
|
35000
|
12,500
5,000
|
25,000
10,000
|
25,000
10,000
|
25,000
10,000
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
11285
|
11,285
|
11,357
|
11,357
|
11,357
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
11285
|
7,288
|
3,293
|
3,293
|
3,293
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
0
|
-3,996
|
-7,992
|
-8064
|
8064
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
0
|
-3,996
|
-11,988
|
-20.052
|
-116820
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Includes indirect GHG leakages.
*The boiler is assumed to be in operation in autumn 1998. The first half of 1998 it is operated as
baseline.
Summary table: Actual emission reductions:
|
GHG
|
Year 0
=1997
|
Year 1
= 1998
|
Year 2
= 1999
|
Year 3
=2000
|
Year 15
|
|
Factual energy production in MWh/year
on biofuels
Mazout
|
|
35000
|
|
|
|
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
11285
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
11285
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
*Calculated values since, the boiler is assumed to be in operation in autumn 1998. The first half of 1998
it is operated as baseline
F. Additionality to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the
framework of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows
Please indicate all sources of project funding.
|
Category of funding
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(US dollars)
|
|
Loan from NUTEK
|
1,600.000
|
|
Grant from NUTEK for technical assistans
|
100.000
|
1 USD = 7.50 SEK
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to
other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the
Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of
endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties
|
Transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how
|
Describe briefly
|
|
Schematically, the transfer of knowledge involves the following activities over time:
i) Technology transfer through NUTEKs technical specialist during the implementation of the
project.
ii) Technology transfer through cooperation between foreign supplier and local partner
iii) Conferences, seminars, documentation and training.
iv) Stimulate "net-working" for the exchange of experience between plant owners with
similar problems, e g "bio-clubs"
|
Technology transfer will take place through
i) NUTEK’s technical specialist support to the local project leader and municipality.
iii) personal from boiler plant has been invited to different seminars and work-shops,
documentation for training has been handed over.
|
Endogenous capacity supported or enhanced:
|
Endogenous capacity
(Name of organization1)
|
Development (DEV) /
enhancement (ENH)
|
Describe briefly
|
|
(DEV)
|
|
1) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations listed is reported under section
A.2 above.
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties,
effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered
Fill in as appropriate:
-
Any practical experience gained:
-
Technical difficulties:
-
Effects encountered:
4) Impacts encountered:
5) Other obstacles encountered:
-
Other:
