NEGOTIATIONS
FOCUS
PROCESS
KEY STEPS
|
|
Your location: Home |
|
|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
|
USIJI Uniform Reporting Document:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
List of
Projects
A. Description of the AIJ project
1. Title of project: Reduced Impact Logging* for Carbon Sequestration in East Kalimantan
2. Host country: Republic of Indonesia
3. Brief project description:
This project will implement reduced-impact logging techniques (RIL) to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions
associated with logging practices in East Kalimantan on the island of Borneo. The project involves the
development of guidelines and procedures for implementing RIL techniques, on-site training in directional
felling, and the implementation of RIL techniques on a total of 600 hectares (ha) of forested land. Of the
total project area, 300 ha are located in the Kiani Lestari forest concession, and 300 ha in the Bulungan
Forest Reserve of the Inhutani II concession.
4. Participants:
|
Name of Organization or Individual
|
Country
|
|
Ministry of Forestry
|
Indonesia
|
|
Association of Indonesian Forest Concession Holders (APHI)
|
Indonesia
|
|
Inhutani II
|
Indonesia
|
|
Kiani Lestari (KL)
|
Indonesia
|
|
Center for International Forestry (CIFOR)
|
Indonesia
|
|
COPEC
|
U.S.A.
|
* Reduced Impact Logging or RIL is being used by COPEC as a service mark for their particular program.
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Ministry of Forestry
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
|
|
Street
|
Gedung Manggala Wanabakti, Blok I, Lt. 4, Jln. Jend. Gatot Subroto
|
|
City
|
Senayan-Jakpus
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Indonesia
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Sarijanto, Msc.
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Ir. Titus
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
6221-573-2721 or 6221-573-0240
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Association of Indonesian Forest Concession Holders
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
APHI
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project administration, monitoring
|
|
Street
|
Gedung Manggala Wanabakti, Blok IV, Lt. 9, Wing B, JI. Jend. Gatot Subroto
|
|
City
|
Senayan, Jakarta
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
10270
|
|
Country
|
Indonesia
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Prastowo
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Ir. Hendro
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
6221-573-7036
|
|
Direct fax
|
6221-573-2564
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Inhutani II
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project administration
|
|
Street
|
Gedung Manggala Wanabakti, JI. Jend. Gatot Subroto
|
|
City
|
Jakarta
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
10270
|
|
Country
|
Indonesia
|
|
Telephone
|
6121-572-1330-31
|
|
Fax
|
6221-573-3790
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Said
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Ir. Moch.
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Kiani Lestari
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project administration
|
|
Street
|
Wisma Kalimanis Lt. 10, JI. MT. Haryono Kav. 33
|
|
City
|
Jakarta Selatan
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Indonesia
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Kramadibrata
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Suharsono
|
|
Job title
|
S.H.
|
|
Direct telephone
|
6221-798-5929
|
|
Direct fax
|
6221-798-5894
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Center for International Forestry
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
CIFOR
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project development, monitoring
|
|
Street
|
JI. Gunung Batu No. 5
|
|
City
|
Bogor
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
16001
|
|
Country
|
Indonesia
|
|
Telephone
|
62-251-343-652
|
|
Fax
|
62-251-326-433
|
|
E-mail
|
d.dykstra@cgnet.com
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Soekartiko
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Ir. Bambang
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
COPEC
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project development
|
|
Street
|
225 Madeline Dr.
|
|
City
|
Pasadena
|
|
State
|
California
|
|
Post code
|
91105
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
626-799-9059
|
|
Fax
|
626-799-1069
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Jones
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Don Justin
|
|
Job title
|
Managing Director
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
djustinjones@earthlink.net
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
5. Description of AIJ project activities:
|
Item
|
|
|
Type of Project
|
|
Sector(s)
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Reduced impact logging
|
|
Project Location
|
|
Country
|
Republic of Indonesia
|
|
Exact location (city, state, region)
|
Site 1 is in the Kiana Lestari concession, and Site 2 is in the Bulungan Forest Reserve of the
Inhutani II concession. Both sites are located in East Kalimantan, on the Island of Borneo.
|
|
Key Dates and Current Stage of Project
|
|
Project starting date (month/year)
|
Date dependent on funding
|
|
Project ending date (month/year)
|
Date dependent on funding
|
|
Project lifetime (years)
|
40
|
|
Current stage of project
|
Mutally agreed
|
|
General Project Description and Technical Data
|
|
This project will implement reduced-impact logging techniques (RIL) to decrease net greenhouse gas
emissions associated with logging practices in East Kalimantan on the island of Borneo. The project
involves the development of guidelines and procedures for implementation of RIL techniques, on-site
training in directional felling, and implementation of RIL techniques.
RIL will be introduced on two sites of concession land: Site 1 is 300 ha of forest land within the
223,500 ha Kiani Lestari concession, and Site 2 is 300 ha of forest land within the 300,000 ha
Bulungan Forest Reserve of the Inhutani II concession. The forests are lowland dipterocarp forests,
which have not been previously harvested, and are not densely populated. On-site training will be
conducted in RIL techniques, followed by implementation of these techniques. RIL can reduce logging
damage by as much as 50% through pre-cutting vines, directional felling, and planned extraction of
timber on properly constructed and utilized skid trails. RIL techniques have been successfully
implemented in neighboring Malaysia.
|
6. Cost:
(a) Explanation of methodology for calculating cost data
|
Methodology for Calculating Cost Data
|
|
The estimated cost of implementing RIL in Kalimantan, Indonesia was developed based on the
assumption that the costs and carbon-saving benefits in East Kalimantan are similar to that of
Sabah, Malaysia. Research was conducted to support pilot projects in southeastern Sabah, Malaysia
in 1992, in which a power company provided funds to a timber concessionaire to implement guidelines
aimed at reducing logging damage. Based on this research, Pinard and Putz (in Retaining Forest
Biomass by Reducing Logging Damage in Biotropica 28(3):278-295) estimated that it would cost
U.S. $300 per ha to implement RIL guidelines in dipterocarp forests in Sabah.
The cost of applying RIL techniques to 600 ha (at approximately $300 per ha) in the Kiani Lestari
and Inhutani II concessions is estimated to be $180,000.
The cost per tonne of carbon is estimated to be $5. This estimate is based on the project
development and implementation costs divided by the GHG benefits. The project development costs are
considered confidential by the project developer.
|
(b) Cost data–Project development
This information is considered confidential by the developer and therefore is not available.
(c) Cost data–Project implementation
Annual implementation cost information is not yet available.
Itemized Project Implementation Costs
7. Monitoring and verification of AIJ project activities and results:
|
Item
|
|
|
Party(ies) that will be monitoring project activities
|
CIFOR scientists, KL and Inhutani II foresters, other Indonesian researchers and technicians
|
|
Party(ies) that will be externally verifying project results
|
Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) participants (see below)
|
|
Date when the monitoring plan became (or will become) operational (month/year)
|
3 months after project implementation begins
|
|
Types of data that will be collected
|
Biomass density, biomass growth rate, timber extraction volumes, residual damage, and soil carbon
content
|
|
Description of Monitoring and Verification Activities and Schedule for Implementation
|
|
CIFOR scientists, KL and Inhutani II foresters, other Indonesian researchers and technicians will
carry out field measurements necessary to monitor actual CO2 emission reduction and
enhanced sequestration from RIL. All data produced will continue to be peer reviewed and published
in appropriate academic journals. Monitoring will be conducted during the period in which all 600
ha of the project area have been harvested, and then will continue at lower intensity over the
project lifetime. Future updates of CO2 projections will continue to be based on field
measurements of established plots.
Project proponents are jointly responsible for ensuring that RIL areas are protected over the life
of the project. Contractual terms will be established to monitor over the long term.
Researchers plan to monitor the hydrological effects of RIL in comparison to conventional logging
in the study area. Studies of the biodiversity consequences of RIL are also planned.
External verification of project results and compliance with RIL guidelines will be carried out by
an Environmental Audit Committee (EAC), which will meet at the project site on a quarterly basis
for the length of the project (40 years). The EAC will be comprised of individuals external to, but
selected by the hosts and principal investors in the project. The host and principal investors each
choose one member of the EAC and then select a third forest harvesting expert by mutual agreement.
This group will then choose additional members with scientific credibility to strengthen the
legitimacy of the project.
|
B. Governmental approval
|
Item
|
|
|
Please check one of the following.
|
This report is a first report.
Or
This report is an intermediate report.
Or
This report is a final report.
|
|
Please check one of the following:
|
This report is a joint report. Letter(s) of approval of this report from the designated national
authority of the other Party(ies) involved in the activity is(are) attached in Section J, Annex.
Or
This report is a separate report.
|
|
Additional comments (if any):
|
|
C. Compatibility with, and supportiveness of, national economic development and socioeconomic and
environmental priorities and strategies
|
Compatibility with Economic Development and Socioeconomic and Environmental Priorities
|
|
The forestry industry in Indonesia controls over 320 million ha of production forest. The
anticipated standardization of certification guidelines after 2000 could have a significant impact
on the Indonesian economy. This project will build local capacity to understand and implement
sustainable logging systems in preparing for post 2000 certification standards. This project will
also allow companies to begin meeting these standards and accessing niche certification markets in
the U.S. and Europe.
|
D. Environmental, social/cultural, and economic impacts of the AIJ project
|
Non-Greenhouse-Gas Environmental Impacts of the Project
|
|
Through the reduction of forest damage by 50% relative to conventional logging, the project will
enhance the sustainability of logging operations, improve the growth of residual trees, and
encourage more rapid natural regeneration throughout much of the RIL area. Maintenance of forest
cover and protection of surface soils from bulldozer damage will reduce rates of erosion.
Preliminary studies suggest that by controlling the logging process, populations of understory
birds (considered to be good "indicator species") will be maintained; the same species
suffer greatly in conventionally harvested areas.
|
|
Social/Cultural Impacts of the Project
|
|
The KL and Inhutani II concession areas are sparsely inhabited, and population pressure in remote
areas of East Kalimantan may be decreasing due to industrialization and urban migration. The
probability that the RIL harvesting areas will be converted to other land use (e.g. agricultural
use) is minimal. The steep slopes and infertile soils make the area inappropriate for any use that
is more intensive than selective logging.
|
|
Economic Impacts of the Project
|
|
There are no data to suggest or reasons to suspect that implementation of RIL guidelines will
affect local or regional supply, demand, or price of timber products. Improved market access or
price premiums may result if the area is certified by an accredited agency and is well managed.
|
E. Greenhouse gas impacts of the AIJ project
1. Scenario description
|
Item
|
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
1 of 2
|
|
Site name/designation
|
Kiani Lestari (KL) Concession
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Conventional logging
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
Current logging practices in Kiani Lestari involve felling trees in random directions, due in part
to the trees being literally tied together by vines, and extraction by bulldozers, which results in
damage to both the residual stand and the soil. Studies in neighboring Malaysia indicate that these
conventional logging practices break and uproot as many as 50% of the remaining trees and disturb
soils on up to 40% of the land area. The Malaysian studies found that harvesting as few as 10 to 15
trees per ha released as much as 300 - 350 t CO2. In the absence of the project,
uncontrolled and destructive logging practices are expected to continue in Kiani Lestari. Logging
with conventional techniques is assumed to occur once, within one year, during the project
lifetime.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Reduced impact logging
|
|
Description:
The project will develop and implement reduced impact logging practices on 300 ha within the
223,000 ha Kiani Lestari concession. RIL is expected to reduce logging damage by as much as 50%
through pre-cutting vines, directional felling, and planned extraction of timber on properly
constructed and utilized skid trails. Logging with RIL techniques is assumed to occur once during
the project lifetime. Data developed in Malaysia show that there will be reduced CO2
emissions and enhanced sequestration in RIL harvested areas for decades. Even following a second
harvest utilizing RIL techniques, occurring in 30 to 60 years after the first forest harvest, the
CO2 benefits remain positive relative to conventional logging. RIL techniques also
reduce the susceptibility of the forest to weed infestations that reduce biomass recovery rates,
and lessen the susceptibility to destructive fires. In addition, reducing the amount of the forest
canopy that is opened up will lessen the impacts of changes in temperature, light intensity, wind
speed, and moisture on understory plants and animals. Measures to protect future crop trees, and to
provide incentives to fellers and skidder operators to reduce damage to the forest will also be
taken.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Description:
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
2 of 2
|
|
Site name/designation
|
Bulungan Forest Reserve of Inhutani II Concession
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Conventional logging
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
Current logging practices in the Bulangan Forest Reserve involve felling trees in random
directions, due in part to the trees being literally tied together by vines, and extraction by
bulldozers, which results in damage to both the residual stand and the soil. Studies in neighboring
Malaysia indicate that these conventional logging practices break and uproot as many as 50% of the
remaining trees and disturb soils on up to 40% of the land area. The Malaysian studies found that
harvesting as few as 10 to 15 trees per ha released as much as 300 - 350 t CO2. In the
absence of the project, uncontrolled and destructive logging practices are expected to continue in
Kiani Lestari. Logging with conventional techniques is assumed to occur once, within one year,
during the project lifetime.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Reduced impact logging
|
|
Description:
The project will develop and implement reduced impact logging practices on 300 ha within the
Inhutani II concession. RIL is expected to reduce logging damage by as much as 50% through
pre-cutting vines, directional felling, and planned extraction of timber on properly constructed
and utilized skid trails. Logging with RIL techniques is assumed to occur once during the project
lifetime. Data developed in Malaysia show that there will be reduced CO2 emissions and
enhanced sequestration in RIL harvested areas for decades. Even following a second harvest
utilizing RIL techniques, occurring in 30 to 60 years after the first forest harvest, the
CO2 benefits remain positive relative to conventional logging. RIL techniques also
reduce the susceptibility of the forest to weed infestations that reduce biomass recovery rates,
and lessen the susceptibility to destructive fires. In addition, reducing the amount of the forest
canopy that is opened up will lessen the impacts of changes in temperature, light intensity, wind
speed, and moisture on understory plants and animals. Measures to protect future crop trees, and to
provide incentives to fellers and skidder operators to reduce damage to the forest will also be
taken.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Description:
This information is not yet available.
|
2. GHG emission/sequestration calculation methodology
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
1 of 2
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
The methodology used to estimate annual net CO2 emissions tracks carbon in above- and
belowground biomass and in wood products over the 40-year lifetime of the project. Following
harvest in year one, portions of the wood harvest and on-site damaged biomass are assumed to decay
at varying rates depending upon fate (i.e., wastewood at the mill, wood products, or on-site
logging debris), and residual living biomass on site is assumed to grow and accumulate carbon. Soil
carbon stocks are assumed to remain constant, and there are no post-harvest silviculture treatments
or forest fires. The assumptions used in the calculations (e.g., biomass carbon stocks, the timber
extraction volume and allocations to decay pools, residual damage, rates of decay, and biomass
growth rates) are based on studies of conventional logging practices in lowland dipterocarp forests
of Sabah, Malaysia.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
Under the project scenario, RIL techniques are assumed to be used on 85% of the 300 ha site; 15% of
the site is assumed to be "unloggable because of restriction in the RIL guidelines"
(e.g., buffer zones, steep slopes). Carbon stocks on the unlogged portion are assumed to remain
constant throughout the lifetime of the project. Carbon stocks in the remainder of the project site
are tracked in the same way as in the reference scenario, except that the assumptions used in the
calculations (e.g., timber extraction volumes, residual damage, biomass growth rates) are based on
studies of RIL in lowland dipterocarp forests of Malaysia.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
2 of 2
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
The methodology used to estimate annual net CO2 emissions tracks carbon in above- and
belowground biomass and in wood products over the 40-year lifetime of the project. Following
harvest in year one, portions of the wood harvest and on-site damaged biomass are assumed to decay
at varying rates depending upon fate (i.e., wastewood at the mill, wood products, or on-site
logging debris), and residual living biomass on site is assumed to grow and accumulate carbon. Soil
carbon stocks are assumed to remain constant, and there are no post-harvest silviculture treatments
or forest fires. The assumptions used in the calculations (e.g., biomass carbon stocks, the timber
extraction volume and allocations to decay pools, residual damage, rates of decay, and biomass
growth rates) are all based on studies of conventional logging practices in lowland dipterocarp
forests of Sabah, Malaysia.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
Under the project scenario, RIL techniques are assumed to be used on 85% of the 300 ha site; 15% of
the site is assumed to be "unloggable because of restriction in the RIL guidelines"
(e.g., buffer zones, steep slopes). Carbon stocks on the unlogged portion are assumed to remain
constant throughout the lifetime of the project. Carbon stocks in the remainder of the project site
are tracked in the same way as in the reference scenario, except that the assumptions used in the
calculations (e.g., timber extraction volumes, residual damage, biomass growth rates) are based on
studies of RIL in lowland dipterocarp forests of Malaysia.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
3. GHG emission/sequestration data
(a) Reporting of GHG emissions/sequestration
(b) Additional information on GHG emissions/sequestration
|
Indirect or Secondary GHG Impacts (Positive and Negative)
|
|
Benefits of the project may accrue to non-project areas due to dissemination of information about
RIL techniques beyond the project area. Logging crews in non-RIL areas might adopt guidelines
developed by the project because they increase efficiency while decreasing harvesting damage.
One goal of RIL is to harvest the same volume of timber under RIL as under conventional logging.
This goal may not be achieved for several reasons including: exclusion from harvesting of areas on
steep slopes and riparian zones in RIL areas, isolation of areas due to the above guidelines, and
development of RIL guidelines that might be too restrictive. This issue creates the secondary
effect of displacing demand for forest products to other forested areas. The scale of the secondary
effect is not known at this time.
|
|
Factors That Could Cause the Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
As discussed above, there might be a displacement of demand for forest products to other forested
areas.
Regionally-based data on forest fires suggest the probability of a fire in RIL-harvested areas is
less than 5% in 50 years.
|
|
Strategy for Reducing the Risk of Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
COPEC, KL, Inhutani, and CIFOR are working to resolve the issue of displacing demand for forest
products to other forested areas.
Although no specific measures are being taken to reduce the risk, RIL inherently reduces this risk
because it preserves the majority of the forest canopy and reduces the accumulation of logging
debris.
|
F. Funding of the AIJ project
1. Identification of funding sources:
Currently there is no funding available and the project developers are actively seeking funding.
(a) Funding sources for project development
This information is not yet available.
(b) Funding sources for project implementation
This information is not yet available.
2. Assessment of additional funding needs:
|
Current or Planned Activities to Obtain Additional Funding
|
|
At this time, there have been no commitments of funding, but COPEC has approached possible
private-sector investors with preliminary information about the project.
|
G. Contribution to capacity building and technology transfer
|
Contribution to Capacity Building and Technology Transfer
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
H. Recent developments, technical difficulties, and obstacles encountered
|
Recent Project Developments
|
|
There are no recent project developments.
|
|
Technical Difficulties and Other Obstacles Encountered
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
I. Additional information
|
Additional Information
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
J. Annex
1. Host country acceptance of the AIJ project:
|
Country/Project Title
|
Name, Title, and Government Agency of the Designated National Authority
|
Date of Approval(day/month/year)
|
|
Reduced Impact Logging for Carbon Sequestration in East Kalimantan
|
Aca Sugandhy, Assistant I of the State Minister of Environment, Ministry of Environment
|
23 January 1997
|
2. Letters of approval of this AIJ project report:
See attached letter of concurrence.
|
|