NEGOTIATIONS
FOCUS
PROCESS
KEY STEPS
|
|
Your location: Home |
|
|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
|
USIJI Uniform Reporting Document:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
List of
Projects
A. Description of the AIJ project
1. Title of project: ECOLAND: Piedras Blancas National Park
2. Host country: Costa Rica
3. Brief project description:
The ECOLAND Project will preserve tropical forest through the purchase of approximately 2,500
privately-owned hectares in the Piedras Blancas National Park (formerly named the Esquinas National Park)
in southwestern Costa Rica. The purchased land will be conveyed to the Costa Rican Park Service for
permanent protection. Greenhouse gas benefits accrue from conservation of existing carbon stocks on the
park land that would have otherwise been deforested.
4. Participants:
|
Name of Organization or Individual
|
Country
|
|
Ministry of Environment and Energy (MINAE)
|
Costa Rica
|
|
Conservación y Manejo de Bosques Tropicales (COMBOS)
|
Costa Rica
|
|
Regenwald der Osterreicher
|
Costa Rica & Austria
|
|
Tenaska Washington Partners II, L.P
|
U.S.A.
|
|
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF)
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Ministerio de Ambiente y Energía-formerly Ministerio de Recursos Naturales, Energía y
Minas
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Ministry of Environment and Energy-formerly Ministry of Natural Resources, Energy and Mines
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
MINAE, formerly MIRENEM
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
None
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Government regulation/oversight and monitoring/verification
|
|
Street
|
Apartado 8-5810-1000
|
|
City
|
San José
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Costa Rica
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Castro Salazar
|
|
First name, middle name
|
René
|
|
Job title
|
Minister
|
|
Direct telephone
|
506-40-6010
|
|
Direct fax
|
506-40-5240
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Conservación y Manejo de Bosques Tropicales
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
COMBOS Foundation
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
COMBOS
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project administration, financing
|
|
Street
|
Apartado Postal 1456-2050
|
|
City
|
San Pedro
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Costa Rica
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
combos@nicarao.apc.org
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Wells
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Bob
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
506-253-0736
|
|
Direct fax
|
506-253-4750
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
echancon@sol.racsa.co.cr
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Regenwald der Osterreicher
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Rainforests of the Austrians
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
None
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
None
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Monitoring/verification, financing
|
|
Street
|
Apartado 930-1200
|
|
City
|
Pavas
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Costa Rica
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Schnitzler
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Michael
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
506-232-5436
|
|
Direct fax
|
506-232-5436
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Tenaska Washington Partners II, L.P
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
None
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
None
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Financing
|
|
Street
|
1044 N. 115th, Suite 400
|
|
City
|
Omaha
|
|
State
|
Nebraska
|
|
Post code
|
68154-4446
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
402-691-9587
|
|
Fax
|
402-691-9530
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Kunkel
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Greg
|
|
Job title
|
Director, Environmental Affairs
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
NFWF
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Financing
|
|
Street
|
1120 Connecticut Ave., N.W.
Suite 900
|
|
City
|
Washington
|
|
State
|
District of Colombia
|
|
Post code
|
20036
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Stangel
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Peter
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
202-857-0166
|
|
Direct fax
|
202-857-0162
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
5. Description of AIJ project activities:
|
Item
|
|
|
Type of Project
|
|
Sector(s)
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Forest preservation and natural regeneration
|
|
Project Location
|
|
Country
|
Costa Rica
|
|
Exact location (city, state, region)
|
The Piedras Blancas National Park, adjacent to the Osa Peninsula, southwest Costa Rica
|
|
Key Dates and Current Stage of Project
|
|
Project starting date (month/year)
|
January 1995
|
|
Project ending date (month/year)
|
January 2010
|
|
Project lifetime (years)
|
16
|
|
Current stage of project
|
In progress
|
|
General Project Description and Technical Data
|
|
The ECOLAND Project will preserve tropical forest through the purchase of approximately 2,500
hectares (ha) of privately-owned land in the Piedras Blancas National Park (formerly named the
Esquinas National Park) in southwestern Costa Rica. Approximately 2,150 ha of the land purchased
are forested. The remaining 350 ha have already been cleared, but forest regeneration is
anticipated to occur once the area is protected. All 2,500 ha of land have been purchased through
the project and are in the final stages of being conveyed to the Costa Rican National Park Service
for permanent protection.
The 12,500-hectare Esquinas Forest was declared a national park by the Government of Costa Rica in
1993, but almost all of the land within the park is privately-owned. Some landowners hold logging
concessions, a number of which are active, and many owners face economic pressures that encourage
deforestation. Under Costa Rican law, the Government cannot restrict land-use decisions of private
landowners, meaning the Government must purchase lands it wishes to protect. The ECOLAND Project
will bring nearly 20% of the park’s land under protection.
|
6. Cost:
(a) Explanation of methodology for calculating cost data
|
Methodology for Calculating Cost Data
|
|
Project development costs include costs associated with the review of several potential projects
prior to the selection of the ECOLAND project, the USIJI application process, and other
pre-implementation activities. Project implementation costs include land purchases and creation of
a $40,000 endowment to cover annual implementation costs.
|
(b) Cost data–Project development
Itemized Project Development Costs
(c) Cost data–Project implementation
Annual implementation cost information is not yet available.
Itemized Project Implementation Costs
7. Monitoring and verification of AIJ project activities and results:
|
Item
|
|
|
Party(ies) that will be monitoring project activities
|
National Park Service, Regenwald der Osterreicher, COMBOS
|
|
Party(ies) that will be externally verifying project results
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Date when the monitoring plan became (or will become) operational (month/year)
|
November 1996
|
|
Types of data that will be collected
|
Biomass stocks
|
|
Description of Monitoring and Verification Activities and Schedule for Implementation
|
|
On a year-to-year basis, the National Park Service will perform routine monitoring of forest
conservation activities in the Piedras Blancas National Park and insure that the purchased areas
are protected from incursion or logging. In addition, the Austrian group Regenwald der Osterreicher
has recently established an eco-tourist lodge in the Esquinas area. The staff of the lodge will
provide on-the-ground monitoring of the protection status of the project area.
Periodic satellite and other photographic imaging will also be used to monitor protection of the
project area. A biomass survey will be conducted to confirm the magnitude of the carbon savings
associated with the project.
|
B. Governmental approval
|
Item
|
|
|
Please check one of the following.
|
This report is a first report.
or
This report is an intermediate report.
or
This report is a final report.
|
|
Please check one of the following:
|
This report is a joint report. Letter(s) of approval of this report from the designated national
authority of the other Party(ies) involved in the activity is(are) attached in Section J, Annex.
or
This report is a separate report.
|
|
Additional comments (if any):
|
|
C. Compatibility with, and supportiveness of, national economic development and socioeconomic and
environmental priorities and strategies
|
Compatibility with Economic Development and Socioeconomic and Environmental Priorities
|
|
The ECOLAND project is actively supported by the government of Costa Rica. Most tourists are
attracted to Costa Rica by its natural areas. Tourism revenues in 1993 were $577.4 million, up 34
percent over the previous year. In 1993, only 8,000 tourists, or 1 percent of all visitors, made
the 10-hour trek to Corcovado National Park, located on the Osa peninsula. This is a very small
percentage considering the beauty and ecological importance of this park. As improvements in
transportation infrastructure are put in place, however, this volume is likely to skyrocket. The
Costa Rican government considered it imperative that the natural resources of the region, which
form the foundation upon which the tourism industry is based, be protected before uncontrolled
growth adversely affects the region. As such, the project is both compatible with and actively
supportive of the country’s economic development and socioeconomic and environmental
priorities.
|
D. Environmental, social/cultural, and economic impacts of the AIJ project
|
Non-Greenhouse-Gas Environmental Impacts of the Project
|
|
The Osa Peninsula and the surrounding area provide critical habitat for large mammals and birds
that are extinct or threatened in other parts of their range. By securing habitat for species under
threat of extinction, the project will help maintain the rich biodiversity in the area. In
addition, the project will help maintain water quality and will greatly reduce soil erosion
resulting from the removal of plant cover.
The Esquinas Forest was identified by biodiversity experts as the most important concentration of
biodiversity not under adequate protection in Costa Rica. This was part of the basis for selecting
the ECOLAND project over other project opportunities inside and outside of Costa Rica.
|
|
Social/Cultural Impacts of the Project
|
|
The project developer states that there are no identifiable negative developmental impacts of the
project. Landowners currently living on parcels purchased through the project are expected to
relocate to existing farms outside the Piedras Blancas National Park or into urban areas where they
will have greater access to amenities.
|
|
Economic Impacts of the Project
|
|
See discussion above under "Compatibility with Economic Development and Socioeconomic and
Environmental Priorities".
|
E. Greenhouse gas impacts of the AIJ project
1. Scenario description:
|
Item
|
|
|
Scenario Description
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
1 of 1
|
|
Site name/designation
|
ECOLAND: Piedras Blancas National Park
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Deforestation, conversion of agricultural and pastoral lands, logging
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
After the 1996 report was submitted, the amount of land expected to be purchased by the project
changed. As indicated in the 1996 report, the project developer anticipated that approximately
2,340 ha of land would be purchased, of which 2,036 ha were forested and 304 ha had been cleared.
However, the project developer purchased 2,500 ha, of which 2,150 ha is forested and 350 ha have
been cleared.
Although the forest land protected by the project is located within national park boundaries, it is
threatened by logging and conversion to agricultural and pastoral lands by those who privately own
the land. As a result of scarce funds, these private landowners have not been bought out by the
Costa Rican government. Without the project, the 2,150 ha of forest land is projected to be
deforested over the next 15 years. Thus, carbon stocks on the forested area will diminish as
standing timber is either removed or burned. The carbon stocks on the 350 ha of land already
deforested are projected to remain constant over the 15 year project lifetime.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Forest preservation and natural regeneration
|
|
Description:
The predicted project scenario has also been slightly revised since 1996 last report to reflect the
actual amount of land purchased by the project. Of the 2,500 ha of land purchased, approximately
2,150 ha are forested. With the project, this forested land is expected to be protected, thus
preventing carbon dioxide emissions from deforestation that would have occured otherwise. In
addition, the project is expected to allow forest regeneration to occur on another 350 ha of
project land that are currently not forested. The project area has been purchased, and it is in the
process of being placed under the jurisdiction of MINAE and management by the National Park
Service.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Forest preservation and natural regeneration
|
|
Description:
The project has purchased approximately 2,500 ha of land. As anticipated in the predicted project
scenario, approximately 2,150 ha of the land purchased through the project is forested. The
remaining 350 ha had been deforested before it was purchased by the project developer.
|
2. GHG emission/sequestration calculation methodology:
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
1 of 1
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
If not protected by this project, the forested portion of the project area is projected to be
deforested over the next 15 years at an average rate of 143.33 ha/yr (= 2,150 ha/15 yrs). This
deforestation is assumed to begin in the second year of the project.
Based on general soil and vegetation carbon content literature, the total amount of carbon
sequestered on the project forest area is estimated to be, on average, 235 t C/ha, of which 125 t
C/ha is assumed to be stored in soils, and 110 t C/ha in vegetation. In addition, based on general
forest carbon literature, it is estimated that deforestation would result in a 60% loss in soil
carbon, or 75 t C/ha (= 125 t C/ha * .60), and an 80% loss of carbon stored in vegetation, or 88 t
C/ha (= 110 t C/ha * .80). Therefore, it is anticipated that 163 t C/ha would be released through
deforestation, and annual reference case carbon emissions would be 23,363 t C/yr (= 143.33 ha/yr *
163 t C/ha). To determine the CO2 emissions on a full molecular weight basis, the total
tonnes of annual carbon were multiplied by the ratio 44 t CO2/12 t C.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
The initial carbon stock on the 2,150 ha of forested land protected by the project is estimated to
be 505,250 t C (= 235 t C/ha * 2,150 ha). While this forest area is considered to be in
equilibrium, recent biomass removal suggests that biomass growth may occur over the lifetime of the
project. However, to be conservative, additional carbon sequestration due to biomass growth on the
2,150 ha of forested area is not estimated. Instead, annual carbon stocks for the forested area are
held constant to estimate the project scenario, and annual sequestration on the forested area is
estimated to be zero throughout the lifetime of the project.
Carbon stocks on the 350 ha that are no longer forested are anticipated to increase as the area
regenerates its natural forest cover under the protection of the project. It is estimated that 3 t
C/ha would be sequestered annually through biomass growth as the forest regenerates, for an annual
total of 1,050 t C (= 3 t C/ha * 350 ha). Sequestration on this 350 ha of project land is expected
to begin in the second year of the project.
Estimated annual carbon stocks for the project are equal to the carbon stocks on the currently
forested area, 505,250 t C, plus the 1,050 t C sequestered through forest regeneration on the 350
ha of the unforested land each year. Calculations of project scenario carbon stocks are as follows:
Year 1 (1995) 505,250 t C
Year 2 (1996) 505,250 t C + 1,050 t C
Year 3 (1997) Year 2 stock + 1,050 t C
Year 4 (1998) Year 3 stock + 1,050 t C
Year 5 (1999) Year 4 stock + 1,050 t C
etc.
Therefore, anticipated annual carbon sequestration for the project is simply equal to the carbon
sequestered each year through forest regeneration on the 350 ha of the project area that are
currently not forested. To determine sequestration on a full molecular weight basis, the annual
carbon sequestration was multiplied by the ratio 44 t CO2/12 t C.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
A biomass survey was planned to empirically verify the carbon loading figures used in projecting
the GHG benefits of the project. This biomass survey has been delayed pending completion of the
land purchase and conveyance process. Since the land conveyance process is currently underway, it
was anticipated that the biomass survey would be carried out during 1997.
|
3. GHG emission/sequestration data:
(a) Reporting of GHG emissions/sequestration
(b) Additional information on GHG emissions/sequestration
|
Indirect or Secondary GHG Impacts (Positive and Negative)
|
|
The project developer states in the proposal that "because of the alarming rate of
deforestation in Costa Rica and the virtually inevitable result that all remaining primary forest
outside the country’s protected system will be lost in the forseeable future, most within the
next decade...the concept of "carbon leakage" becomes an irrelevant quantitative
variable."
|
|
Factors That Could Cause the Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
The project developer identified the most significant threat to the project area as the inability
to ensure long-term maintenance and protection of the project area.
|
|
Strategy for Reducing the Risk of Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
Four steps will be taken to assure long-term protection and maintenance of the project area. These
steps include: maintaining continued park service presence, negotiating strategic land purchases,
attracting an increase in ecotourism, and creating an endowment of US $40,000.
|
F. Funding of the AIJ project
1. Identification of funding sources:
(a) Funding sources for project development
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount
($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding
(%)
|
|
Tenaska
|
U.S.A.
|
150,000
|
100%
|
|
Total
|
|
150,000
|
100
|
(b) Funding sources for project implementation
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount
($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding(%)
|
Is This Funding Assured? (Y/N)
|
|
Tenaska
|
U.S.A.
|
500,000
|
53%
|
Y
|
|
Rainforests of Austria
|
Austria
|
200,000
|
21%
|
Y
|
|
National Fish and Wildlife Foundation
|
U.S.A.
|
250,000
|
26%
|
Y
|
|
Total
|
|
950,000
|
100
|
|
2. Assessment of additional funding needs:
|
Current or Planned Activities to Obtain Additional Funding
|
|
None (the project is fully funded).
|
G. Contribution to capacity building and technology transfer
|
Contribution to Capacity Building and Technology Transfer
|
|
The Costa Rican Government has stated that the ECOLAND Project will serve as a model for subsequent
Costa Rica-USIJI efforts. The project will also provide Costa Rican institutions with experience in
protecting endangered rainforests.
|
H. Recent developments, technical difficulties, and obstacles encountered
|
Recent Project Developments
|
|
The land purchases have been completed. The project area is in the process of being conveyed to the
National Park Service; however, there have been some delays in this process due to requests by the
Costa Rican government for submission of additional legal documents.
|
|
Technical Difficulties and Other Obstacles Encountered
|
|
Some difficulties in negotiating land purchases were encountered, although in almost all cases the
desired parcels were procured at the forecasted price.
|
I. Additional information
|
Additional Information
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
J. Annex
1. Host country acceptance of the AIJ project:
|
Country/Project Title
|
Name, Title, and Government Agency of the Designated National Authority
|
Date of Approval(day/month/year)
|
|
ECOLAND: Piedras Blancas National Park
|
Rene Castro Salazar, Minister, Ministry of Natural Resources, Energy and Mines (MIRENEM, now MINAE)
|
7 December 1994
|
2. Letters of approval of this AIJ project report:
See attached letter of concurrence.
|
|