Your location: Home

ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
 
Uniform Reporting Format:

Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase

 Annex I

List of Projects

A. Description of project

1) Title of project: Jelgava (I), District Heating Renovation Project

2) Participants/actors:

Item Financier/Reporter Co-reporter

Name of organisation(a):

Statens energimyndighet

Vides Aizsardzîbas un Regionâlâs Attîstîbas Ministrija

Name of organisation (English):

Swedish National Energy Administration

Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development of the Republic of Latvia

Department:

Secretariat for Climate Policy and International Co-operation

Environmental Protection Department

Acronym:

STEM

VARAM

Acronym (English):

STEM

Function within activity:

Assigned by the Swedish Government for Implementation including financing arrangements.

Assigned by the Latvian Government for activities implemented jointly

Street:

Kungsgatan 43

Peldu Str. 25

Post code:

S-117 86

LV 1494

City:

Eskilstuna

Riga

Country:

Sweden

Latvia

Telephone:

+46 16 544 20 00

+371-7 026 508

Fax:

+46 16 544 22 64

+371-7 820 442

E-mail:

klas.tennberg@stem.se

erna@varam.gov.lv

WWW-URL:

http://www.stem.se

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

-------------------------------------

Surname:

Knutsson

Apene

First name, middle name:

Gudrun

Ingrid

Job title:

Head of Section, Climate Investment Programme

Senior official

Direct tel:

+46 16 544 20 72

+371-7 026 508

Direct fax:

+46 16 544 22 64

+371-7 820 442

Direct E-mail:

gudrun.knutsson@stem.se

erna@varam.gov.lv

Borrower

Name of organisation(a):

Jelgavas Dome

Name of organisation (English):

Jelgava Town Council

Department:

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function within activity:

borrower

Street:

Liela 11

Post code:

LV 3001

City:

Jelgava

Country:

Latvia

Telephone:

+371 30 22338

Fax:

+371 30 29059

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

Surname:

Zeps

First name, middle name:

Zaigonis

Job title:

Jelgava Dome director

Direct tel:

+371 30 22 338

Direct fax:

Direct E-mail:

+371 30 29 059

Item Please fill in if applicable Please fill in if applicable

Name of organization(a):

EKODOMA

ÅF International

Name of organization (English):

EKODOMA

Department:

AF – International, Malmö

Acronym:

ÅFI

Acronym (English):

AFI

Function within activity:

Local reporter

Technical support

Street:

Noliktavas 3-3

Stensjögatan 3

Post code:

LV 1010

S-217 65

City:

Riga

MALMÖ

Country:

LATVIA

SWEDEN

Telephone:

+371-7 323212

+46-40-37 50 00

Fax:

+371-7 323210

+46-40-13 03 69

E-mail:

ekodoma@bkc.lv

WWW-URL:

http://www.ekodoma.lv

http://www.af.se

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

-------------------------------------

Surname:

Blumberga

Lindgren

First name, middle name:

Andra

Ulf

Job title:

Directress

project leader

Direct tel:

+371 7 323212

+46-40-37 50 97

Direct fax:

+372-7 323210

+46-40-13 03 69

Direct E-mail:

andra@bkc.lv

Ulf.lindgren@pdn.af

a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

3) Activity:

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Jelgava is a big city near Riga. There are several boiler plants and district heating networks in Jelgava. For one of the biggest boiler plants the main pipeline was replaced several times during the last ten years, but the energy losses were still high and the pipeline in very bad condition because of high ground water level causing corrosion of the pipes.

Type of project:a)

District Heating rehabilitation project

Location (exact, e.g. city, region,

state):

Jelgava town

Jelgava district

LATVIA

Activity starting date:

2. May 1994 (letter-of-intent)

In operation from:

October 1994

Expected activity ending date:

Loan expire date 30. September 2003

Stage of activity:b)

Complete

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

Expected technical lifetime is 25 years which means that the plant is expected to be in operation till 2019.

Technical data:d)

Exchange of the corroded main feeder pipe from the Ganibu heating plant (160 MW), 613 m pipes of 500 mm diameter and 100 m pipes of 300 mm.

a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.

b) Circle the appropriate option.

c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.

  1. Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data requirements are.

Lifetime of activity

Heat production plants (bio fuel)

25 years

New installation of all main equipment parts (fuel handling system, firing equipment and boiler) and modernisation of secondary equipment.

15 years

Conversion of existing boiler but new installation fuel handling system and firing equipment. Modernisation of secondary equipment.

10 years

Limited installation of new equipment (only one part of the three main parts, normally the firing equipment). Modernisation of other equipment.

Heat distribution systems and sub-stations

25 years

Pre-fabricated pipes and installations using certified contractors and supervisor according to EN norms and applicable district heating practise

15 years

Pre-fabricated pipes and installations without using certified contractors and supervisor

10 years

Modernisation of existing pipes.

Energy efficiency in buildings

25 years

Additional insulation roofs walls etc. with Scandinavian technology.

New installed heating systems.

15 years

Renovation and balancing of heating systems including thermostat valves.

10 years

Weather stripping windows, doors etc.

* if a combination of measures is done a reasonable lifetime for the project have to be calculated.

4) Cost (to the extent possible):

To the investment costs are referred the cost of the investment proper and the accumulated interest during the grace period, generally 2 years.

The AIJ/JI cost items are the costs for:

  • Technical assistance, a technical and administrative support from consultants, during the period from definition of the project till commissioning. These costs are paid by STEM.
  • Follow-up, an annual technical and economic follow-up by consultants, hired by STEM, of the operating results of the plant with the objective to improve on its techno-economic sustainability and its climate effect. The cost indicated is an average cost per project.
  • Reporting costs – i e costs in connection with the annual reporting of the project’s climate effects to UNFCCC. The cost indicated is an average cost per project.
  • Administration –Costs for seminars, handbooks, education (capacity building) and average costs of STEM staff per project.
  • Difference in interest rates. STEM applies for its loans generally an interest rate corresponding to 6-month STIBOR (Stockholm InterBank Rate, in April 1999 3,0 %). Assuming a normal lending rate of 7 % means that this loan is associated with a cost of 4 % in relation to normal lending rate.

Investment/instalment = the borrower’s possible own financing of the investment, followed by the borrower’s repayment of the loan.

All costs in USD

Country

Jelgava DH

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Investment

1. Loan/debt to STEM

304800 284600 253000 221400 189800 155606 124021

2. Added costs

0 10900 0 0 0 0 1334

3.Technical assistance

34000 0 0 0 0 0 0

AIJ/JI

4. Follow up

0 7000 8200 8500 2200 2267 2139

A. Sweden

Costs

5. Reporting costs

0 0 0 850 0 744 301

6. Administration

51000 0 0 0 0 0 0

7. Difference in interest

4% 11384 10120 8856 7592 6224 4961

8.Accum. costs for AIJ/JI

85000 103384 121704 139910 149702 158937 166339

9.Total costs

389800 387984 374704 361310 339502 314543 290359

Investment

1. Investment/amortization

0 31100 31600 31600 31600 34194 32919

Latvia

AIJ/JI

2. Reporting costs

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3. Other osts

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Costs

4. Accum. costs for AIJ/JI

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5. Total costs

0 31100 62700 94300 125900 160094 193013

1 USD=

10

SEK

5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:

Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involveda):

It is stated in agreement between STEM and Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development of the Republic of Latvia that local organisation in Latvia, company EKODOMA is assigned for the data collection and evaluation of the climate effects of this project. After an initial work in cooperation with STEM’s assigned consultant, this local organisation would take the main responsibility the continued measuring for JI-reporting.

a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations mentioned is reported under

section A.2 above.

B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement

Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance, approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be shown as follows:

(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached letters issued by the relevant national authorities;

(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been received from all participating Parties.

1) For the activity:

  • * Subsequent reports:

Third report. First report was submitted 1997.

2) This report is a joint report:

  • Yes, Agreement with designated national authority was signed 1997.

3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:

Yes, Agreement with Latvian Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development was signed on March 1999. cf. Annex II, section B

C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio economic and environment priorities and strategies

Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies

The Swedish side considers that the project meets the following objectives in the Latvian Energy Law:

- efficient use of energy resources;

  • creation and usage of energy efficient technologies, fuel/energy consuming and diagnostic equipment, construction and insulation materials; energy flow metering and control devices, automated energy consumption control systems;

Latvia became a Party of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1992.

In accordance with Kyoto Protocol to the UNFCCC on 10 December 1997, Latvia individually or jointly should ensure, that its aggregate anthropogenic CO2 equivalent emissions of CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs and SF6 in 2008 - 2012 should be 8% below the 1990 level.

D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project

Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)

Item Please fill in

Describe environmental benefits in detail:

Annual emissions reduction:

412 ton CO2

3.1 ton SO2

0.3 ton NOx

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?

Yes.

Data collected by EKODOMA

Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:

More stable energy supply. Annual savings of 1 400 MWh.

Improved working conditions, increased motivation.

Securing the heat supplies for more than half of the 72 000 inhabitants in the city of Jelgava.

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?

Yes.

Data collected by EKODOMA

Describe economic benefits in detail:

Decreased energy consumption

Decreased water leakages in the network.

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?

Yes.

Data collected and calculations made by EKODOMA

E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real, measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not have occurred in the absence of such activities

1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):

Present data reflect emission reductions using status quo (emissions in the period before the conversion to renewable fuel) for the baseline case. Calculations, according to the top-down method, for emissions from

different types of projects in the baseline case are being made. The changed calculation method will result in a change in emission reduction. The new data will be introduced as soon as available.

2) Estimated emissions with the activity:

Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:

Emission reductions are calculated using the IPCC Guidelines, using the Carbon Emission Factor (CEF) for different types of fuel, using actual system efficiency. For boiler conversion, the decrease in emissions is calculated in relation to the amount of fossil fuel replaced (status quo). For an energy efficiency project the decrease in emissions reflects the amount of fuel that is saved through the project. In the case that the

system uses renewable fuels, the reduction is calculated comparing the amount of fossil fuels that was used before the conversion to renewable

fuels.

The comparison below is based upon that the base-line scenario represents a status quo solution.

Fill in the following tables as applicable:

Summary table: Projected emission reductions:

GHG

Year 1

=1995

Year 2

=1996

Year 3

=1997

Year 4

=1998

Year 5

=1999

Year 6

=2000

...

Year 25

Saved energy at site based upon the baseline (MWh/year)

1400

1400

1400

1400

1400

1400

1400

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

420

420

420

420

420

420

420

CH4

N2O

other

B) Project activity scenarioa)

CO2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

CH4

N2O

other

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

-420

-420

-420

-420

-420

-420

-420

CH4

N2O

Other

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

-420

-840

-1260

-1680

-2100

-2520

-10 500

CH4

N2O

Other

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

Summary table: Actual emission reductions:

GHG

Year 1

= 1995

Year 2

= 1996

Year 3

=1997

Year 4

=1998

Year 5

=1999

Year 6

=2000

...

Year 25

Factual energy production on biofuels/ saved energy (MWh/year)

1300

1200

1200

1100

965

580

1058*

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

460

450

450

410

350

200

386*

CH4

N2O

other

B) Project activity scenarioa)

CO2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

CH4

N2O

other

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

-460

-450

-450

-410

-350

-200

-386

CH4

N2O

Other

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

-460

-910

-1360

-1770

-2120

-2320

-9667

CH4

N2O

Other

* - average figure for previous full years of operation

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

F. Additionality to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows

Please indicate all sources of project funding.

Category of funding

(For each source one line)

Amount

(US dollars)

Loan from NUTEK/STEM

420.946 USD

Grant from NUTEK/STEM for technical assistance

44.960 USD

1 USD = 7.50 SEK

G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of endoge


Ready for some Climate Change News?

Visit the
NEWSROOM