|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
List of Projects
Uniform Reporting Format:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
Annex I
A. Description of project
1) Title of project:
Sventupe Boiler Conversion + Energy efficiency
2) Participants/actors:
|
Item
|
Financier/Reporter
|
Co-reporter
|
|
Name of organisation(a):
|
Statens energimyndighet
|
Aplinkos ministerija
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Swedish National Energy Administration
|
Ministry of Environment
|
|
Department:
|
Secretariat for Climate Policy and International Co-operation
|
Environmental Quality department
|
|
Acronym:
|
STEM
|
AM
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
STEM
|
MoE
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Assigned by the Swedish Government for implementation including financing arrangements.
|
Assigned by the Lithuanian Government for activities implemented jointly
|
|
Street:
|
Kungsgatan 43
|
Jakšto 4
|
|
Post code:
|
BOX 310, S-631 04
|
LT-2600
|
|
City:
|
Eskilstuna
|
Vilnius
|
|
Country:
|
Sweden
|
Lithuania
|
|
Telephone:
|
+46-16 544 20 00
|
+370-2 61 90 49
|
|
Fax:
|
+46-16 544 22 64
|
+370-2-22 08 47
|
|
E-mail:
|
klas.tennberg@stem.se
|
atm@nt.gamta.lt
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.stem.se
|
http://www.gamta.lt
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Knutsson
|
Bilkis
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Gudrun
|
Mindaugas
|
|
Job title:
|
Head of Section, Climate Investment Programme
|
Director of Environmental Quality Dept.
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+46-16 544 20 72
|
+370-2-61 90 49
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+46-16 544 22 64
|
+370-2-22 08 47
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
gudrun.knutsson@stem.se
|
atm@nt.gamta.lt
|
|
Borrower
|
|
Name of organisation(a):
|
SPAB "Ukmerges siluma"
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Joint Stock Company "Ukmerges siluma"
|
|
Department:
|
-
|
|
Acronym:
|
-
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
SPAB US
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Borrower
|
|
Street:
|
Sviesos 17
|
|
Post code:
|
LT-4120
|
|
City:
|
Ukmerge
|
|
Country:
|
Lithuania
|
|
Telephone:
|
+370 11 65 454
|
|
Fax:
|
+370 11 65 455
|
|
E-mail:
|
sil.tinklai@is.lt
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
-
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
|
|
Surname:
|
KUPCINSKAS
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
JUOZAS
|
|
Job title:
|
Deputy Director
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+370 11 65 454
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+370 11 65 455
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
sil.tinklai@is.lt
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Lietuvos energetikos institutas
|
ÅF Energikonsult Syd AB
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Lithuanian Energy Institute
|
|
|
Department:
|
Heat-Equipment Research and Testing Laboratory
|
AF - International AB
|
|
Acronym:
|
LEI
|
ÅFE
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
LEI
|
AFE
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Local reporter
Responsible for the measuring and collecting results for EAES-reporting.
|
Technical support
|
|
Street:
|
Breslaujos 3
|
Stensjögatan 3
|
|
Post code:
|
LT 3035
|
S-217 65
|
|
City:
|
Kaunas
|
MALMÖ
|
|
Country:
|
Lithuania
|
SWEDEN
|
|
Telephone:
|
+ 370 (7) 45 34 95, 40 18 63
|
+46-40-37 50 00
|
|
Fax:
|
+ 370 (7) 35 12 71
|
+46-40-13 03 69
|
|
E-mail:
|
testlab@isag.lei.lt
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.lei.lt
|
http://www.af.se
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Pedisius
|
Mårtensson
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Nerijus
|
Roland
|
|
Job title:
|
Senior Research Associate
|
project leader
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+ 370 (7) 40 18 64
|
+46-40-37 51 04
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+ 370 (7) 35 12 71
|
+46-40-13 03 69
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
nerijus@isag.lei.lt
|
rmn@ens.af.se
|
|
|
|
a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the
activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the
activity.
3) Activity:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Sventupe is a small village just outside Ukmerge town. The Municipal company owned the district heating
system till 2000 but then the SP UAB "Ukmerges siluma" rented Sventupe heating company. The
production costs are very high. The annual energy need is about 7000 MWh.
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Energy efficiency and fuel switching to renewable fuels
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region,
state):
|
Sventupe village
Ukmerge District
LITHUANIA
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1996-07-26 (Loan agreement)
|
|
In operation from:
|
March 1997
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
30 March 2006
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Complete
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
Expected technical lifetime is 25 years which means that the plant is expected to be in operation till
2021.
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
In this project, a conversion to bio-fuel has been made by the installation of a completely new boiler (1.5
MW) to replace one of the old ones. The installation is made up of fuel storage with an automatic fuel
handling system, combustion equipment and flue gas cleaning system. Estimated energy production 7000
MWh/year. Substations have been renovated for buildings approx. 10 units.
|
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency; renewable
energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture;
industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data requirements
are.
Lifetime of activity
Heat production plants (bio fuel)
|
25 years
|
New installation of all main equipment parts (fuel handling system, firing equipment and boiler) and
modernisation of secondary equipment.
|
|
15 years
|
Conversion of existing boiler but new installation fuel handling system and firing equipment. Modernisation
of secondary equipment.
|
|
10 years
|
Limited installation of new equipment (only one part of the three main parts, normally the firing
equipment). Modernisation of other equipment.
|
Heat distribution systems and sub-stations
|
25 years
|
Pre-fabricated pipes and installations using certified contractors and supervisor according to EN norms and
applicable district heating practise
|
|
15 years
|
Pre-fabricated pipes and installations without using certified contractors and supervisor
|
|
10 years
|
Modernisation of existing pipes.
|
Energy efficiency in buildings
|
25 years
|
Additional insulation roofs walls etc. with Scandinavian technology.
New installed heating systems.
|
|
15 years
|
Renovation and balancing of heating systems including thermostat valves.
|
|
10 years
|
Weather stripping windows, doors etc.
|
- If a combination of measures is done a reasonable lifetime for the project have to be calculated.
4) Plant cost (to the extent possible):
To the investment costs are referred the cost of the investment proper and the accumulated interest during the
grace period, generally 2 years.
The AIJ/JI cost items are the costs for:
- Technical assistance, a technical and administrative support from consultants, during the period from
definition of the project till commissioning. These costs are paid by STEM.
- Follow-up, an annual technical and economic follow-up by consultants, hired by STEM, of the operating results
of the plant with the objective to improve on its techno-economic sustainability and its climate effect. The cost
indicated is an average cost per project.
- Reporting costs – i.e. costs in connection with the annual reporting of the project’s climate
effects to UNFCCC. The cost indicated is an average cost per project.
- Administration – average costs of STEM staff per project.
- Difference in interest rates. STEM applies for its loans generally an interest rate corresponding to 6-month
STIBOR (Stockholm InterBank Rate, in April 1999 3,0 %). Assuming a normal lending rate of 7 % means that this loan
is associated with a cost of 4 % in relation to normal lending rate.
Investment/instalment = the borrower’s possible own financing of the investment, followed by the
borrower’s repayment of the loan.
All costs in USD
|
Country
|
|
Sventupe BC
|
1997
|
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
|
|
|
0
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
Investment
|
1. Loan/debt to STEM
|
225000
|
221200
|
186366
|
156731
|
|
|
2. Added costs
|
5700
|
5200
|
0
|
1686
|
|
|
3.Technical assistance
|
35000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
AIJ/JI
|
4. Follow up
|
0
|
2200
|
2267
|
2139
|
|
A. Sweden
|
Costs
|
5. Reporting costs
|
850
|
0
|
744
|
301
|
|
|
6. Administration
|
47000
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
7. Difference in interest
|
4%
|
8848
|
7455
|
6269
|
|
|
8.Accum. costs for AIJ/JI
|
82850
|
93898
|
104364
|
113074
|
|
|
9.Total costs
|
313550
|
315098
|
290729
|
269805
|
|
Investment
|
1. Investment/Instalment
|
20000
|
14700
|
34834
|
31320
|
|
2. Lithuania
|
AIJ/JI
|
2. Reporting costs
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Costs
|
3. Other costs
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
4. Accum. costs for AIJ/JI
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
5. Total costs
|
20000
|
34700
|
69534
|
100854
|
|
1 USD=
|
10
|
SEK
|
|
|
|
|
5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involveda):
|
|
Lithuanian Ministry of Environment is a central Lithuanian authority responsible on reporting of
JI-projects. This authority assigns a local organisation Lithuanian Energy Institute that is involved in to
the evaluation of the climate effects of this project. Lithuanian Energy Institute takes the main
responsibility to continue measuring, results collecting for JI-reporting.
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organisations mentioned is reported under section A.2
above.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance, approval
or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be shown as
follows:
(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one
participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached letters issued
by the relevant national authorities;
(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national authority of
each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been received from all
participating Parties.
1) For the activity:
Fourth report.
-
This report is a joint report:
- Yes, Endorsement letter was submitted 2001.
3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
-
Activity. The scope of work of this agreement consist of collection basic data, examination project
possibilities, engineering, supervision, inspection, local investigations, preparation reports cf. Annex II,
section B.
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio- economic and environment
priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national economic
development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies
|
|
The project meets with the following objectives in the Lithuanian energy sector:
- to reduce the energy intensity
- to reduce dependence on fuel imports
- to create new working places
- to involve the local companies into production of equipment for new firing technology
- to create and improve energy infrastructure based on indigenous energy resources
- to reduce of fossil fuel consumption which results in emission reduction and currency saving
- to develop cooperation between Baltic, Nordic and other Central European countries
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be
given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of
quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
Annual emissions reduction:
Projected 2000
1 489 ton CO2 726 ton CO2
1838* 896
1 270 619
2 ton SO2 1 ton SO2
0 ton NOx - ton NOx
Lower pollution.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
No.
|
|
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:
|
Higher employment
Environmental aspects
Improved working conditions, increased motivation
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?
|
No.
|
|
Describe economic benefits in detail:
|
Lower fuel costs
Decreased energy consumption
Saving from the improvement of control equipment in substations and re-insulation of distribution pipes -
15 %
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?
|
Yes. Collected by LEI experts since 1998 and updated every year.
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real, measurable
and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not have occurred in
the absence of such activities
1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied: Present data reflect emission
reductions using status quo (emissions in the period before the conversion to renewable fuel) for the baseline
case. Calculation methods are being revised and will result in a change in emission reduction. The new data will be
introduced as soon as available.
2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:
Emission reductions are calculated using the IPCC Guidelines, using the Carbon Emission Factor (CEF) for different
types of fuel, using actual system efficiency. For boiler conversion, the decrease in emissions is calculated in
relation to the amount of fossil fuel replaced (status quo).
For energy efficiency project the decrease in emissions reflects the amount of fuel that is saved through the
project. In the case that the system uses renewable fuels, the reduction is calculated comparing the amount of
fossil fuels that was used before the conversion to renewable fuels.
Below comparison is based upon that the base-line scenario represents a status quo solution.
Fill in the following tables as applicable:
Summary table: Projected emission reductions:
|
GHG
|
Year 1
= 1997
|
Year 2
= 1998
|
Year 3
= 1999
|
Year 4
= 2000
|
...
|
Year 25
|
|
Planned energy production MWh/year
Biofuel
Natural gas
|
|
7 000
|
7 000
|
7 000
|
7 000
|
|
7 000
|
|
Planned annual fuel consumption MWh/year
Biofuel
Natural gas
|
|
8 537
|
8 537
|
8 537
|
8 537
|
|
8 537
|
|
Estimated energy saving MWh/year
|
|
1 050
|
1 050
|
1 050
|
1 050
|
|
1 050
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
1 489
1 838*
1 270
|
1 489
1 838
1 270
|
1 489
1 838
1 270
|
1 489
1 838
1 270
|
|
1 489
1 838
1 270
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect (B-A)
|
CO2
|
-1 489
-1 838
-1 270
|
-1 489
-1 838
-1 270
|
-1 489
-1 838
-1 270
|
-1 489
-1 838
-1 270
|
|
-1 489
-1 838
-1 270
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
-1 489
-1 838
-1 270
|
-2 978
-3 676
-2 540
|
-4 467
-5 514
-3 810
|
-5 956
-7 352
-5 080
|
|
-37 225
-45 950
-31 750
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
*The data in black colour are calculated using the programme provided by ÅF Energikonsult Syd AB. The net
calorific value of natural gas - 11,6 MWh/t used in this programme.
The data in red colour presented in this table are calculated according to formulas and discounting values from DNV
"Multi-Project Verification of 31 Swedish-Baltic AIJ Projects" report. The net calorific value of natural
gas – 9,35 MWh/t. Almost all recommendations and remarks from DNV "Multi-Project Verification of 31
Swedish-Baltic AIJ Projects" report are involved in these calculations.
The data in blue colour are calculated using the programme provided by ÅF Energikonsult Syd AB and the real
net calorific value of natural gas in Lithuania - 13,6 MWh/t.
Summary table: Actual emission reductions:
|
GHG
|
Year 1
= 1997
|
Year 2
= 1998
|
Year 3
= 1999
|
Year 4
= 2000
|
...
|
Year 25
|
|
Factual energy production MWh/year
Biofuel
Natural gas
|
|
4 980
|
3 530
|
3 460
|
3 410
|
|
3 845
|
|
Factual annual fuel consumption MWh/year
Biofuel
Natural gas
|
|
6 073
|
4 305
|
4 220
|
4 159
|
|
4 689
|
|
Factual energy saving MWh/year
|
|
747
|
530
|
519
|
512
|
|
577
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
1 059
1 308*
904
|
751
927
641
|
736
909
628
|
726
896
619
|
|
818
1010
698
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect (B-A)
|
CO2
|
-1 059
-1 308
-904
|
-751
-927
-641
|
-736
-909
-628
|
-726
-896
-619
|
|
-818
-1010
-698
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
-1 059
-1 308
-904
|
-1 810
-2 235
-1 545
|
-2 546
-3 144
-2 173
|
-3 272
-4 040
-2 792
|
|
-20 450
-25 250
-17 450
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
*The data in black colour are calculated using the programme provided by ÅF Energikonsult Syd AB. The net
calorific value of natural gas - 11,6 MWh/t used in this programme.
The data in red colour presented in this table are calculated according to formulas and discounting values from DNV
"Multi-Project Verification of 31 Swedish-Baltic AIJ Projects" report. The net calorific value of natural
gas – 9,35 MWh/t. Almost all recommendations and remarks from DNV "Multi-Project Verification of 31
Swedish-Baltic AIJ Projects" report are involved in these calculations.
The data in blue colour are calculated using the programme provided by ÅF Energikonsult Syd AB and the real
net calorific value of natural gas in Lithuania - 13,6 MWh/t.
F. Additionally to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework
of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows
Please indicate all sources of project funding.
|
Category of funding
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(US dollars)
|
|
Loan from NUTEK
|
300.000 (budget)
|
|
Grant from NUTEK for technical assistance
|
43.000 (per May 1997)
|
1 USD = 7.50 SEK
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other
Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the Convention. In
this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of endogenous capacities
and technologies of developing country Parties
|
Transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how
|
Describe briefly
|
|
Schematically, the transfer of knowledge involves the following activities over time:
i) Technology transfer through STEM technical specialist during the implementation of the project.
- Technology transfer through cooperation between foreign supplier and local partner
- Conferences, seminars, documentation and training.
iv) Stimulate "net-working" for the exchange or experience between plant owners with similar
problems, e g "bio-clubs"
|
Technology transfer has taken place through
- STEM technical specialist support to the local project leader and municipality.
The following up group for testing and adjustment of converted boilers has been formed in Lithuanian Energy
Institute. Personnel of Heat-Equipment Research and Testing Laboratory is carrying out following up
procedures keeping a close relation with and AF Energikonsult company as the main supervisor of conversion
projects supported by STEM.
- The local company "Kazlu Rudos Metalas" with participation of the Swedish company
"Hotab" mainly performed the execution of these biofuel conversion projects.
iii) Personal from boiler plant has been invited to different seminars and workshops, documentation for
training has been handed over.
There were arranged three seminars through close cooperation between STEM and LEI:
/Environmentally Friendly Energy Systems in the Baltic and Eastern Europe Countries/ (Seminar), Kaunas,
21-22 March, 1995
/Environmentally Adapted Energy Systems in the Baltic Region and Eastern Europe/ (Seminar), Birzai, 19-20
November 1998.
/Environmentally-Adapted Local Energy Systems /(Seminar and book presentation), Druskininkai, 21 November
1998.
Translation and preparation of safe operation regulations for wood waste burning boiler houses.
This job was supported by STEM.
- Association "Bio energy and energy saving" has been founded at the end of 1997 to coordinate
the attempts of wood firing equipment producers, wood wastes suppliers and owners of boiler plants.
|
Endogenous capacity supported or enhanced:
|
Endogenous capacity
(Name of organisation1)
|
Development (DEV) /
enhancement (ENH)
|
Describe briefly
|
|
AB "Kazlu Rudos Metalas"
AB "Kazlu Rudos Metalas"
AB "Umega"
AB "Kazlu Rudos Metalas"
AB "Singaras"
AB "Menranga"
AB "Germeta"
|
DEV
DEV
DEV
ENH
|
New biofuel firing technology was developed. Experience in installation and maintenance of modern western
technology.
The new modern equipment for production pellets from wood dust were developed as demand for other wood fuel
kinds increased
The straw burning technology was started to spread as continuation of successfully realised biofuel
conversion projects.
Many smaller boiler conversion projects were successfully finished in Lithuania by local companies AB
"Kazlu Rudos Metalas", AB "Singaras", AB "Elhamers" during past five years.
The implementation of these projects was initiated by the successfully realised STEM projects.
|
1) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organisations listed is reported under section A.2
above.
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties, effects,
impacts or other obstacles encountered
Fill in as appropriate:
1) Any practical experience gained:
2) Technical difficulties: The problem to keep dust emissions at a low level has caused a rebuilding of the
boiler at the primary stage of the boiler operation. There were no significant technical problems with converted
boiler after improvements in 1997-2000 period.
-
Effects encountered: Price for fuel seems to be lower than calculated thanks to high use of waste from
sawmills.
Execution of biofuel conversion projects according to STEM JI programme caused the activity in the following
fields:
- Production of pre-furnaces and small wood fired boilers by local companies;
- Formation a new policy as respect to cleaning the forests and using the wood wastes or preparation of wood fuel
by the forestry companies/administrations;
- Research and testing the new equipment, execution of the following up activity, training the local personnel
and etc.
4) Impacts encountered: Wood-fired boiler operated at full capacity during the heating season and in summer
time for the lack of consumers it operated at reduced capacity. So the yearly heat production decreased from 4980
MWh in 1997 to 3460 MWh in 1999 and to 3 410 MWh in 2000 respectively.
Due to the higher average ambient temperature in 1999 heating season the heat production decreased a little bit in
comparison with 1998.
5) Other obstacles encountered: According to data of 1996-97, price of heat from gas firing was about 50
Lt/MWh and from wood-firing - 25 Lt/MWh. Saving from the improvement of control equipment in substations and
re-insulation of distribution pipes - 15 % .
-
Other: There is a possibility to increase the load for the boiler house in the future.
|