|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
List of Projects
Uniform Reporting Format:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
|
Name of Organization or Individual
|
Country
|
|
Sunergie SA
|
Mali
|
|
Soumaila Cisse
|
Mali
|
|
PEER Global Environment, Inc.
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
Or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Sinergie SA
Contact: Dr. Salifou Bengaly
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Sinergie SA
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
(N/A)
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(N/A)
|
|
Department
|
(N/A)
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Mali counterpart, and project director
|
|
Street
|
1531, Bd Nelson Mandela Hippodrome II
BP E 2502
|
|
City
|
Bamako
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Mali
|
|
Telephone
|
223 21 78 71
|
|
Fax
|
223 77 04 83
|
|
E-mail
|
Sbengaly@spider.toolnet.org
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Abron
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Lilia
|
|
Job title
|
President
|
|
Direct telephone
|
301 816 0700
|
|
Direct fax
|
301 816 9291
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
Peer1@ix.netcom.com
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Same as above
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
-
5. Description of AIJ project activities
|
Item
|
|
|
Type of Project
|
|
Sector(s)
|
Climate change/ renewable energy utilization
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
|
|
Project Location
|
|
Country
|
Mali
|
|
Exact location (city, state, region)
|
Bamako, Segou, and Sikasso
|
|
Key Dates and Current Stage of Project
|
|
Project starting date (month/year)
|
Unknown
|
|
Project ending date (month/year)
|
Unknown
|
|
Project lifetime (years)
|
20 years
|
|
Current stage of project
|
Looking for funding
|
|
General Project Description and Technical Data
|
|
PEER Global Environment Foundation proposes to pilot this concept of energy centers in the West African
country of Mali and to initially establish three centers; one in Segou, one in Sikasso, and one in Bamako.
These are the three largest cities (Administrative Regions) in Mali. Bamako is the capital city, and is the
most urban of the three. However, the capital city is only 15% electrified, so the services offered in the
proposed centers are needed in all three cities. There are many reasons why we selected Mali for this
initial project, but first and foremost is that Mali is a member of EWAS, the economic block for the
French-speaking West African countries. Also, Mali tends to be a leader in this block, and if successful in
Mali, these centers will be easily replicated throughout the other smaller countries in EWAS.
These centers will be set up to demonstrate sustainable techniques for traditional building methods, and
provide needed energy, communication, and economic development services. All services provided by the
center will be done on a "fee for service" basis and items sold will be at fair market prices.
The intent is for the centers to be sustainable and capable of being replicated. This is a first step in
market transformation for the utilization of new building, renewable energy, and other clean energy
technologies.
The center is a solution to the challenge of bringing necessary sustainable economic development services
to a population sector that would otherwise be the last group to be helped as growth and development of a
country occur, the rural and peri-urban sector. This project also begins to address the challenge of how to
make rural areas acceptable to young people. For the purposes of this project, we are calling these centers
"Energy Centers," but the name can change depending on each community’s preference.
The centers will demonstrate and sell appropriate renewable energy devices and other clean fuels for
domestic and commercial uses. The centers will sell such items as propane (LPG) for cooking, 12-volt
batteries, and distilled water for the batteries, charcoal, etc. The center will also sell and demonstrate
the equipment and appliances that utilize energy-efficiency designs, such as televisions, radios, lamps,
refrigerators, sewing machines, solar water pumps, hydraulic pumps, passive solar stoves, PV and passive
solar water heaters, LPG stoves, PV systems of all types, etc.
|
|
The center would also serve as the communication center for the area. It will provide a local and long
distance telephone service utilizing solar powered cellular phones if possible, access to computers and the
Internet by serving as an Internet café. Other miscellaneous communication services may include photo
and facsimile services; provided these services are not offered by other facilities in the area. The
ability to offer these services will also be dependent on the location of the telephone satellite or
line-connected telephone services, as well as Internet satellites. The overall intent is to utilize and
demonstrate, as much as possible, renewable and other clean energies and to stimulate the desire for these
products in that market place.
The center will be the supplier and maintenance provider of a variety of energy-generating devices and
technologies. It is envisioned that the center will sell, install and maintain PV systems, LPG stoves,
solar ovens, passive solar water heating systems, 12-volt batteries and the ability to charge those
batteries, solar-powered batteries for cell phones, and other devices, and appropriate appliances and other
devices. The center could become the energy store for the area if one does not exist, or it could combine
its efforts with the business that is already providing energy supplies. These decisions will be made
during the planning phases of the project. It is also envisioned that at some point the center could serve
as a bulk power supplier for the region or community where it is located.
|
|
Methodology for Calculating Cost Data
|
|
The cost data are composed of actual costs for project development to date, and estimated costs for labor,
travel, communication, building and equipping the center, and training staff to manage and operate all
operations and activities of the center.
|
Itemized Project Development Costs
Itemized Project Implementation Costs
|
Year(s)
|
Item
|
Projected Amount
(US$)
|
Actual Amount
(US$)
|
|
Project Costs
|
|
|
|
1st year
|
Labor:
|
|
|
|
Project Principal 160 hrs.
|
34,400.00
|
|
|
Project Manager 460 hrs.
|
53,820.00
|
|
|
Project Associate, level 3 160 hrs.
|
14,400.00
|
|
|
Site Manager
|
137,280.00
|
|
|
Management Trainees
|
50,000.00
|
|
|
Center Operator/staff (6 months)
|
50,000.00
|
|
|
Consultants
|
50,000.00
|
|
|
Travel and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
U.S./Mali 3 trips
|
6,000.00
|
|
|
South Africa/Mali 6 trips
|
12,000.00
|
|
|
Communications
|
5,000.00
|
|
|
Travel in Mali (car rental, petro, plane fares, etc.)
|
25,000.00
|
|
|
Housing for Site Manager/project team
|
20,000.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Center construction and equipment for Center:
|
|
|
|
Cost of Center
|
10,000.00
|
|
|
Mudbrick Equipment
|
5,000.00
|
|
|
Rammed Earth equipment
|
100,000.00
|
|
|
Battery Charging station
|
25,000.00
|
|
|
Refrigerator and freezer
|
5,000.00
|
|
|
Cell phones, and computers
|
30,000.00
|
|
|
Fax and copy machines
|
2,000.00
|
|
|
Budget for rest of inventory
|
50,000.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
684,900
|
|
|
Project Revenues
|
|
|
|
Grants and loans
|
684,900
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
Net Project Cost (Project Costs-Project Revenues)
|
0
|
NA
|
-
7. Monitoring and verification of AIJ project activities and results
|
Item
|
Please Complete
|
|
Party(ies) that will be monitoring project activities
|
PEER Global Environment Foundation
Mali Ministry of the Environment
|
|
Party(ies) that will be externally verifying project results
|
Wits University in South Africa and University of Mali and Mali Solar Energy Research Center
|
|
Date when the monitoring plan became (or will become) operational (month/year)
|
Monitoring plan will become operational the same day the center opens.
|
|
Types of data that will be collected
|
|
|
Description of Monitoring and Verification Activities and Schedule for Implementation
|
|
A physical and social monitoring plan will be developed to monitor the baseline, and greenhouse gas
emissions and greenhouse gas emissions reductions. The plan will be developed for a one-year, in-depth
monitoring program of all energy uses in the store and the residence in the store, and the plan will call
for periodic verification of the results obtained during the one-year, in-depth study. PEER Global will be
responsible for monitoring the greenhouse gas emissions and greenhouse gas emissions
reductions/sequestration over the lifetime of the project.
The specific data to be collected will be quantities of the various fuels used, solar-power generated and
used, frequency of use and time of use, number of 12-volt batteries charged using the 12-volt solar-powered
station, and using the back-up diesel generator. Carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide levels in the store and
the residence will be measured. The frequency of use of the LPG and solar ovens and what they were used
for, and frequency of use of all of the equipment in the store will be monitored and documented. As items
are purchased in the store, data will be kept on how the items were used, and how often. The intent is to
determine if market transformation to the new technologies is occurring.
The baseline will basically be the condition that would have existed in the absence of the interventions.
It is assumed that the traditional ways of cooking, working, and lighting would continue. We will rely on
national data to verify these estimates, and we will base the estimates on actual use data of the
interventions. We will monitor daily for one year the use (quantities of the various fuels consumed, solar
power used and times of use, 12-volt battery usage, and number of batteries charged using the solar-powered
charging station, and the back-up generator) the usage of the various interventions in the store, and the
residence in the store. This detailed, daily monitoring of all energy usages in the store and the residence
will also help us to more accurately define the potential for emission losses due to the use of traditional
fuels and the traditional ways of doing things.
We plan to collect detail data for at least one year. This will give us valuable insights into how people
actually live and use these interventions. These data are very valuable for verifying carbon saved,
avoided, or mitigated, and the factors that could cause reversal. Data collection procedures, including a
description of the sampling methodologies, emissions monitoring equipment and methodologies for estimating
emissions from the raw data will be described.
Data collection procedures are changing every day so we can say at this time how the data will be
collected, and the actual schedule. We are sure that the first year will consist of constant monitoring,
but that could change, since the continuous monitoring being done by us now for another project is
generating more data than we know what to do with. We are presently using state-of-the-art data loggers
being monitored remotely by cell phones for the monitoring we are presently engaged in. The equipment we
are using has never been used before for this type of work, but it is doing everything we wanted it to do,
and is saving a lot of time, and security for our workers in the field is a moot point.
The preparation of a monitoring plan for these projects is quite expensive and funds will be sought to
prepare the monitoring plan, and purchase the equipment for monitoring.
|
|
Item
|
Please Complete
|
|
Please check one of the following.
|
This report is a first report.
Or
This report is an intermediate report.
Or
This report is a final report.
|
|
Please check one of the following:
|
This report is a joint report. Letter(s) of approval of this report from the designated national authority
of the other Party(ies) involved in the activity is(are) attached in Section J, Annex.
or
This report is a separate report.
|
|
Additional comments (if any):
|
|
-
C. Compatibility with, and supportiveness of, national economic development and socioeconomic and
environmental priorities and strategies
|
Compatibility with Economic Development and Socioeconomic and Environmental Priorities
|
|
There is a total of 1 megawatts of power in the entire country of Mali. There are 10 million inhabitants of
that country. The country is basically described at rural and peri-urban. The World Bank is presently
working a major lending scheme to assist with the electrification of the rural and peri-urban areas. In
fact, the capital city Bamako is only 15% electrified. Thus, this project is compatible with the economic
development and socioeconomic and environmental priorities.
|
-
D. Environmental, social/cultural, and economic impacts of the AIJ project
|
Non-Greenhouse-Gas Environmental Impacts of the Project
|
|
The project also meets the qualifications of projects classified as "NO Regrets." Thus, this
project has significant, positive non-Greenhouse Gas environmental impacts as well.
|
|
Social/Cultural Impacts of the Project
|
|
The social and cultural impacts of this project are equally as significant. The project will enhance the
ability of the country to nurture and document its culture for posterity, and the energy centers will serve
as a coalescing point for communities where they are located.
|
|
Economic Impacts of the Project
|
|
The center will provide jobs for the community, training for community residents, savings programs to
purchase services sold at the center which will enhance the lifestyles of the community members, and the
center will sell time saving and energy devices for the home and the work environment. Also, by providing a
reliable source of energy, the energy services provided by the center will stimulate economic growth of the
community where they are located.
|
-
E. Greenhouse gas impacts of the AIJ project
1. Scenario description
|
Item
|
Please Complete for Each Site
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
|
|
Site name/designation
|
Energy Centers for Mali
|
|
Project sector
|
Energy
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Selling renewable energy services, and appliances and tools, operating an internet café and cell phone
store, providing small business training, micro loans, and energy efficient building materials.
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
The reference scenario is explained in the first section of this report.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
|
|
Description:
The project will employ specific measures to make solar technologies and LPG known, available, and
affordable, and thereby result in a significant reduction of diesel, petroleum, kerosene, wood, and
charcoal. The measures include the introduction and use of renewable energy technologies, clean fuels,
innovative building materials, training programs, and savings programs for the purposes of improving the
quality of life, promoting economic development, and improvement of the environment including the reduction
and avoidance of the generation of greenhouse gases. The overall goal is market transformation to the
utilization of clean fuels and energy efficient and environmentally friendly technologies and devices.
These measures will include active demonstrations and utilization of PV systems, passive solar systems, and
bottled gas (LPG) as practical and positive alternatives to the utilization of fossil fuels for meeting the
energy needs of homes and communities. The center will utilize these fuels and technologies on a daily
basis, conduct demonstrations of the technologies and devices, provide these services, technologies, and
devices on a retail basis and also provide installation, maintenance and spare parts items sold in the
center. Additional services offered will be communication services (phone center, computer center, internet
café, etc.), home building services, training, and financial services in the form of establishing a
savings program to aid the residents in obtaining the items and services being provided by the centers.
The exact location for the center is not known at this time.
It is assumed that PV systems will be used to replace kerosene for lighting and a significant amount of
diesel fuel used for operating generators for battering charging and the operation of small machines and
equipment. LPG will be used to replace the kerosene, wood, and charcoal used for cooking and passive solar
systems will be used to replace the wood, charcoal, and kerosene used for water heating.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
|
|
Description:
The project has not started yet. We are still looking for funding.
|
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
|
|
Project sector
|
Energy
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
Well over 80% of Malin residents live without easy access to electricity and other clean fuels that could
provide energy for existing uses and economic growth and development of the country. The state-run electric
utility that provides electricity to most of the country from Bamako is overwhelmed trying to meet its
current mandates. In fact, the capital city is only 15% electrified. Presently, a majority of the
households depend on kerosene lamps for lighting, wood and charcoal for cooking, the utilization of 12-volt
batteries for the operation of lamps, televisions and other small machines, and diesel for the operation of
generators to produce electricity when the central power grid is down and for the operation of small
machines and other equipment. The combustion of kerosene, wood, charcoal, and other fossil fuels such as
kerosene, diesel, and petroleum results in the emissions, primarily of CO2 and CH4.
Additionally, the disposal of spent 12-volt batteries often results in contamination of soils and water.
The availability of these energy centers would aid in reducing significantly the dependence on these
commonly used fuels and devices for power and energy.
The yearly per-capita consumption of wood, charcoal, gas/diesel, and kerosene fuels for the rural areas of
Mali follow (data obtained from the 1992 National Biomass Study):
Fuel Type Annual Per-Capita Usage
Wood 550 kg
Charcoal 250 kg
Kerosene 4.5 kg
A typical Malian family is assumed to consist of 8 members.
Fuel wood combustion evolves about 1.7 tonnes CO2/tonne bone-dry wood, but the wood being burned
is probably 50% moisture, the figure becomes 0.85 tonnes CO2 per tonne of wood. The wood burning
probably also emits methane, but this is quite sensitive to specific conditions like draft air and will not
be addressed in this analysis for wood.
Kerosene has 853 kilograms of carbon per tonne and thus emits 853 x 44/12 =3.130 tonnes
CO2/tonne of fuel.
Charcoal is between 85% and 98% carbon (and will be assumed to be 90% carbon) so burning a tonne of carbon
emits 900 kg times 44/12 = 3.3 tonnes CO2. In addition, charcoal production directly gives off
492 kg of CO2 and between 21 and 26 kg of CH4 per tonne. So the total is 3.8 tonnes
CO2 plus another 23.5 kg of CH4 per tonne of charcoal. The CO2 equivalent
of the CH4 is 21 times 23.5 kg = 0.5 tonnes per tonne of charcoal.
|
|
Based on the above data, a Malian family will produce the following amounts of CO2:
Wood: (0.85t CO2/t wood)*(0.55t/person/yr)*(8 people/family) = 3.8t
CO2/family/yr
Kerosene: (3.13t CO2/t kerosene)*(0.0045t/person/yr)*(8 people/family) = 0.1t
CO2/family/yr
Charcoal:
Indirect CO2 generation: (3.3t CO2/t charcoal)*(0.25t/person/yr)*(8 people/family) =
6.6t CO2/ family/yr
Direct CO2 generation: (0.5t CO2/t charcoal)*(0.25t/person/yr)*(8 people/family) =
1.0t CO2/family/yr
CO2 from CH4 generation: (0.0245t CH4/t charcoal)*(21t CO2/1t
CH4)*(0.25t/person/yr)* (8 people/family) = 1.1t CO2/family/yr
Total CO2 generation from charcoal = 8.7t CO2/family/yr
Total CO2 generation per family per year = 12,600 kg
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
The project will employ specific measures to make solar technologies and LPG known, available, and
affordable, and thereby result in a significant reduction of diesel, petroleum, kerosene, wood, and
charcoal. The measures include the introduction and use of renewable energy technologies, clean fuels,
innovative building materials, training programs, and savings programs for the purposes of improving the
quality of life, promoting economic development, and improvement of the environment including the reduction
and avoidance of the generation of greenhouse gases. The overall goal is market transformation to the
utilization of clean fuels and energy efficient and environmentally friendly technologies and devices.
These measures will include active demonstrations and utilization of PV systems, passive solar systems, and
bottled gas (LPG) as practical and positive alternatives to the utilization of fossil fuels for meeting the
energy needs of homes and communities. The center will utilize these fuels and technologies on a daily
basis, conduct demonstrations of the technologies and devices, provide these services, technologies, and
devices on a retail basis and also provide installation, maintenance and spare parts for the items sold in
the center. Additional services offered will be communication services (phone center, computer center,
internet café, etc.), home building services, training, and financial services in the form of
establishing a savings program to aid the residents in obtaining the items and services being provided by
the centers.
Three areas will be selected for the installation of the centers: Sikasso, Segou, and Bamako. The exact
location for each center is not known at this time.
It is assumed that PV systems will be used to replace kerosene for lighting and a significant amount of
diesel fuel used for operating generators for battering charging and the operation of small machines and
equipment. LPG will be used to replace the kerosene, wood and charcoal used for cooking and passive solar
systems will be used to replace the wood, charcoal, and kerosene used for water heating. Thus, for purposes
of these calculations, we are assuming that 70% of the wood, charcoal, and kerosene being used now will be
replaced using other fuels and energy sources, and the use of diesel will be reduced by 90%. The diesel
reduction could be significant economically, since all diesel in Mali is presently imported. There are no
GHG emissions associated with the utilization of solar systems, either passive or PV. There are greenhouse
gas emissions associated with the use of LPG, but it is a significantly cleaner and environmentally
acceptable fuel.
There is a total of 1.9 kg CO2 produced per kg of LPG. It is assumed that this project will
substitute 20% of the BTU energy generated from wood, kerosene, and charcoal in the reference
scenario with LPG. Given that wood generates 19,000 BTU/kg, kerosene generates 50,000 BTU/kg, and charcoal
generates 24,500 BTU/kg, the following calculates the total BTU generation per family per year:
- [(19,000)*(550)+(50,000)*(4.5)+(24,500)*(250)](8 people/family) = 135 million BTU/family/yr
LPG will substitute for 20% of this amount or 27 million BTU/family/yr.
The amount of LPG needed to produce 27 million BTU is
The following calculations present the amount of GHG generated by the project scenario:
CO2 from LPG:
900 kg/yr * 1.9 kg CO2/kg LPG = 1,700 kg CO2/family/year
CO2 from non-substituted wood/kerosene/charcoal:
(0.3)*(12,600 kg CO2/family/yr)= 3,780 kg CO2/family/yr
Total CO2 generated from project scenario: 5,500 kg/family/yr
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
Project has not been funded, therefore there is not an actual project yet.
|
-
3. GHG emission/sequestration data
|
Projected Net Greenhouse Gas Benefits: All Project Sites
(Tonnes, Full Molecular Weight Basis)
|
|
Year 1 = 2002
|
|
Reference Scenario Emissions
|
Project Scenario Emissions
|
Net GHG Benefits
(Reference Scenario - Project Scenario)
|
Cumulative GHG Benefits
(Reference Scenario - Project Scenario)
|
|
Year
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
CO2-
Equivalent
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
CO2-
Equivalent
|
|
1
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
18
|
0.1
|
|
21
|
|
2
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
35
|
0.3
|
|
41
|
|
3
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
53
|
0.4
|
|
62
|
|
4
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
71
|
0.6
|
|
83
|
|
5
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
89
|
0.7
|
|
103
|
|
6
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
106
|
0.8
|
|
124
|
|
7
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
124
|
1.0
|
|
144
|
|
8
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
142
|
1.1
|
|
165
|
|
9
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
159
|
1.3
|
|
186
|
|
10
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
177
|
1.4
|
|
206
|
|
11
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
195
|
1.5
|
|
227
|
|
12
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
212
|
1.7
|
|
248
|
|
13
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
230
|
1.8
|
|
268
|
|
14
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
248
|
2.0
|
|
289
|
|
15
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
266
|
2.1
|
|
310
|
|
16
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
283
|
2.2
|
|
330
|
|
17
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
301
|
2.4
|
|
351
|
|
18
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
319
|
2.5
|
|
372
|
|
19
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
336
|
2.7
|
|
392
|
|
20
|
34.2
|
0.14
|
|
16.5
|
0.00
|
|
17.7
|
0.14
|
|
20.6
|
354
|
2.8
|
|
413
|
|
Total
|
684
|
3
|
|
330
|
0
|
|
354
|
3
|
|
413
|
354
|
3
|
|
413
|
-
(b) Additional information on GHG emissions/sequestration
|
Indirect or Secondary GHG Impacts (Positive and Negative)
|
|
(N/A)
|
|
Factors That Could Cause the Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
Factors that could cause the future loss of reversal of GHG benefits are primarily economic. An increasing
number of community residents having sufficient financial means to purchase the clean fuels and new
technologies may not occur. Those that are using the cleaner fuels and newer technologies may not be able
to maintain this standard of living. The availability of LPG may stop. The supply of services, equipment,
and fuels being offered by the kiosks may not be able to keep up with demand, and others have not entered
the market to help meet the demand for these items. Thus, people would return to the old ways of running
their households, businesses, and farming practices. Projected emission reductions could also occur if
availability of grid electricity occurs and it is cheaper than these measures to meet the energy
requirements of their daily lives.
|
|
Strategy for Reducing the Risk of Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
Project is not operational, thus no strategies have been devised.
|
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount ($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding (%)
|
|
PEER Global Environment Foundation, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount ($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding (%)
|
Is This Funding Assured? (Y/N)
|
|
Project has not been implemented
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
|
-
2. Assessment of additional funding needs:
|
Current or Planned Activities to Obtain Additional Funding
|
|
We submitted a proposal for project funding to the Ashden Foundation. It was not accepted. We recently
prepared a proposal to the World Bank in its Marketplace Development Program. It was not accepted. We are
presently preparing proposals to UNEP, the Solar Development Fund, and OPIC. We have not been able to get
debriefings to determine why the Ashden Foundation or the World Bank did not accept the proposals.
|
-
G. Contribution to capacity building and technology transfer
|
Contribution to Capacity Building and Technology Transfer
|
|
The centers will be staffed and operated completely by community residents. This is an excellent example of
capacity building and technology transfer. PEER Global will train the proprietor of the center and all the
staff on how to manage the center, operate the equipment, install it, and repair it. It is anticipated that
the first training program will be multi-tiered and will consist of classroom and hands-on training. The
program will take 4 months of classroom and we will work the staff intensely for the next 8 months. At the
end of the first year of operation, we will provide a site manager that will work with the staff for
another year, and then after that the site manger will start decreasing the amount of time spent at the
center. We expect full turnover of the center to the community or the owner within a 3 to 5 year period.
|
-
H. Recent developments, technical difficulties, and obstacles encountered
|
Recent Project Developments
|
|
Not applicable.
|
|
Technical Difficulties and Other Obstacles Encountered
|
-
I. Additional information
J. Annex
|
Country/Project Title
|
Name, Title, and Government Agency of the Designated National Authority
|
Date of Approval (day/month/year)
|
|
Mali, "Energy Center for Mali"
|
Minister Soumaila Cisse, Minister de l’Environement
|
July 2000
|
-
2. Letters of approval of this AIJ project report:
- See attached letter of concurrence.
(concurrence letter)
|