|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
List of Projects
Uniform Reporting Format:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
A. Description of projectA. Description of projectA. Description of projectA. Description of projectA.
Description of projectA. Description of project
1) Title of project: Ludza, Latvia, fuel switch project
2) Participants/actors:
Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item AFunction within
activity".
|
Item
|
Reporter
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Essent Energie,
Business Unit Essent Duurzaam
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Essent Energie,
Business Unit Essent Duurzaam
|
|
Department:
|
Portfoliomanagement
|
|
Acronym:
|
Essent
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
Essent
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Investor
|
|
Street:
|
Dr. Van Deenweg 1
|
|
Post code:
|
8025 BP
|
|
City:
|
Zwolle
|
|
Country:
|
The Netherlands
|
|
Telephone:
|
+31 38 8524436
|
|
Fax:
|
+31 38 8524900
|
|
E-mail:
|
100733.3021@compuserve.com
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.essent.nl
http://www.ji4u.com
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Van de Ven
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Johannes M. W. A.
|
|
Job title:
|
International Business Developer
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+31 38 852 4936
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+31 38 852 4900
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
100733.3021@compuserve.com
|
a) Organization includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organizations, etc.
involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely
following the activity.
|
Item
|
Latvian co-reporter
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Vides Aizsardzîbas un Regionâlâs Attîstîbas Ministrija
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development of the Republic of Latvia
|
|
Department:
|
Environmental Protection Department
|
|
Acronym:
|
VARAM
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Assigned by the Latvian Government for activities implemented jointly
|
|
Street:
|
Peldu Str. 25
|
|
Post code:
|
LV 1494
|
|
City:
|
Riga
|
|
Country:
|
Latvia
|
|
Telephone:
|
+371-7 026 508
|
|
Fax:
|
+371-7 820 442
|
|
E-mail:
|
erna@varam.gov.lv
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Apene
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Ingrid
|
|
Job title:
|
senior official
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+371-7 026 508
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+371-7 820 442
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
erna@varam.gov.lv
|
|
Item
|
Local operator
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
ESSENT Baltic
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
ESSENT Baltic
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Project operator
|
|
Street:
|
Tallinas street 45
|
|
Post code:
|
LV 1012
|
|
City:
|
Riga
|
|
Country:
|
Latvia
|
|
Telephone:
|
+371 7 301 502
|
|
Fax:
|
+371 7 271 840
|
|
E-mail:
|
Essent.baltic@apollo.lv
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
www.essent.lv
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Vigants
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Edgars
|
|
Job title:
|
Manager
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+371 7 301 502
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+371 7 271 840
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Edgars.essent@apollo.lv
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Ludzas pilsetas dome
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Ludza Municipality
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Local project partner
|
|
Street:
|
Raina 16
|
|
Post code:
|
LV 5700
|
|
City:
|
Ludza
|
|
Country:
|
Latvia
|
|
Telephone:
|
+371 57 23630
|
|
Fax:
|
+371 57 23630
|
|
E-mail:
|
Ludzas_dome@apollo.lv
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Lazovska
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Valentina
|
|
Job title:
|
Municipality Major
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+371 57 23630
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+371 57 23630
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Ludzas_dome@apollo.lv
|
3) Activity:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Ludza is situated in east part of Latvia, 300 km from Riga, close to Russian border. The project concerns
replacing of the boiler house fired by mazut fuel by a new one fired by biomass. Subsequently the project
turns around the unsatisfactory district-heating situation into a more commercial viable and environmental
sustainable district heating in Ludza city in Latvia. The implementation of technology methods by which the
abundant locally available fuel for firing in the form of wood residues approved as commercially attractive
as well as environmentally the most sustainable
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Fuel switching
|
|
Location :
|
Ludza city, Latvia
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
February, 2001
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
February, 2016
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Completed (Project is realised concerning the heat supply to the Heat Distribution Company, full technical
commissioning expected in december 2001)
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
New boiler house has been built with two boilers inside -7 MW biomass boiler and 7 MW diesel boiler. Total
capacity of boiler house is 14 MW. Main fuel is wood residues, diesel is used to cover the peak loads. It
is estimated that diesel will be needed to cover around 10 % of the total heat demand. The project also
comprises automatic fuel storage and flue-gas cleaning system.
|
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation;
fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data
requirements are.
4) Cost in USD (to the extent possible):
|
Costs of acquiring equipment, systems or technologies
|
1362500
|
|
Costs for construction
|
400000
|
|
|
250000
|
|
|
1500
|
|
|
35000
|
|
|
3500
|
|
Third party costs
|
23000
|
|
Training costs
|
350
|
|
Other costs
|
70000
|
|
Total
|
|
|
AIJ Baseline study and Monitoring costs
|
310000
|
Costs during the course of project (USD)
|
1st year
|
2nd year
|
3rd year
|
|
Acquisition
|
104500
|
104500
|
104500
|
|
Operations
|
450000
|
473000
|
515750
|
|
Third parties
|
42500
|
42500
|
42500
|
|
Monitoring
|
38000
|
38000
|
38000
|
|
Other
|
23000
|
23000
|
23000
|
|
Total costs
|
|
|
|
|
US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:
|
16,7*
|
*The total contribution for AIJ activities development is about 500 000 USD.
The price for ton of CO2 is calculated by dividing of above-mentioned contribution by the tons of
CO2 reduction during period 2008-2012.
5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involved):
|
|
Subsequent JI monitoring will be carrying out by Essent Baltic. The results will be promoted using the
Internet site www.ji4u.com, as well as by reporting to UNFCCC.
The following activities will be executed during the term of the project:
- a base-line study
- back-up first measurement
- monitoring measurements
For monitoring activities the PRIVA Monitoring System will be used.
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations mentioned is reported under
section A.2 above.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance, approval
or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be shown as
follows:
(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one
participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached letters issued
by the relevant national authorities;
(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national authority of
each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been received from all
participating Parties.
1) For the activity:
2) This report is a joint report:
- Yes, forward copy of agreement/endorsement by the designated national authorities involved
3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socioSeconomic and environment
priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national economic
development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies
|
|
The Netherlands side considers that the project meets the following objectives in the Latvian Energy
Policy:
- A stable and transparent environment for the energy sector, which will provide for the sector`s
liberalisation and energy efficiency improvements
- Support for investments, which ensure that energy systems are appropriately maintained and developed,
anticipating the involvement of strategic investor.
- Efficiency improvements in the whole chain of the energy system – from production, transmission
and distribution to final consumption
- A favourable environment for private investments in efficient energy systems (co-generation),
utilisation of domestic and renewable energy resources as well as energy efficiency
- Efficient utilisations of domestic energy resources, replacing energy imports
- Support for the development of environmentally friendly energy sources as wel as new and efficient
technologies.
Latvia became a Party of the United nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in 1992.
In accordance with Kyoto Protocol to the UN FCCC on 10 December 1997, Latvia individually or jointly should
ensure, that its aggregate anthropogenic CO2 equivalent emissions of CO2,
CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs and SF6 in 2008 - 2012 should be 8% below the 1990
level.
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be
given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of
quantative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
Annual emission reductions calculated on the baseline scenario with an estimated heat production of 30,000
MWh based on wood residues.
12 900 ton CO2
210 ton SO2
Wood residues from surounding areas can be used, that was landfilled before
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
Yes, fuel consumption and heat production figures.
|
|
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:
|
More stable and higher quality heat supply.
Improved working conditions and increased motivation.
Improved national economic trade balance.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?
|
No
|
|
Describe economic benefits in detail:
|
Heat production cost price has been reduced by around 16 EURO/MWh
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?
|
Yes,
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real, measurable
and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not have occurred in
the absence of such activities
1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
Present data reflect emission reductions using status quo (emissions in the period before the conversion to
renewable fuel) for the baseline case. Calculations are based on data from previous years:
- Produced heat (MWh/y)
- Mazut consumption
- Boiler efficiency
|
Unit
|
1995
|
1996
|
1997
|
1997/98
|
|
Mazut consumption
|
t
|
4195
|
4212
|
4456
|
3693
|
|
Produced heat
|
MWh
|
45510
|
37930
|
35450
|
33320
|
|
Boiler house efficiency
|
%
|
80
|
76.5
|
67
|
69.6
|
Emissions of greenhouse gases prior to the start of the project (baseline information 97’)
|
Greenhouse gases
|
tons
|
GWP
|
tons of CO2 equivalent
|
|
CO2
|
13710
|
1
|
13710
|
|
CH4
|
0.537
|
21
|
11.28
|
|
N2O
|
0.108
|
310
|
33.31
|
|
Total
|
|
|
14650
|
2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
Emission reductions are calculated using the IPCC Guidelines, using the Carbon Emission Factor (CEF) for different
types of fuel, using actual system efficiency. For boiler conversion, the decrease in emissions is calculated in
relation to the amount of fossil fuel replaced.
Emissions of greenhouse gases after the project implementation with the proposed reduction measures
(prognoses)
|
Greenhouse gases
|
1st year
tons (2001)
|
2nd year
tons
|
3rd year
tons
|
|
CO2
|
1272
|
1367
|
2035
|
|
CH4 (CO2 ekv.)
|
60.63
|
65.47
|
70.81
|
|
N2O (CO2 ekv.)
|
120.4
|
130.02
|
141.09
|
|
Total (CO2 ekv.)
|
1453.03
|
1562.49
|
2247.0
|
Fill in the following tables as applicable:
Summary table: Projected emission reductions:
|
GHG
|
Year 1 (2001)
|
Year 2
|
Year 3
|
Year (2016)
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
13710
|
13710
|
13710
|
13710
|
|
CH4
|
11.28
|
11.28
|
11.28
|
11.28
|
|
N2O
|
33.31
|
33.31
|
33.31
|
33.31
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
1272
|
1367
|
2035
|
|
|
CH4
|
60.63
|
65.47
|
70.81
|
|
|
N2O
|
120.4
|
130.02
|
141.09
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
12438
|
12343
|
11675
|
|
|
CH4
|
- 49.35
|
-54.15
|
-59.53
|
|
|
N2O
|
-87.09
|
-96.71
|
-107.78
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
Summary table: Actual emission reductions:
|
GHG
|
Year 1 (2001)
|
Year 2
|
Year 3
|
Year (2016)
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
13710
|
13710
|
13710
|
13710
|
|
CH4
|
11.28
|
11.28
|
11.28
|
11.28
|
|
N2O
|
33.31
|
33.31
|
33.31
|
33.31
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity dataa)
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
F. Bearing in mind that the financing of activities implemented jointly shall be additional to financial
obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial mechanism as
well as to current official development assistance flows, please indicate
|
Source of project funding
including pre-feasibility phase
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(in US dollars)
(1 US$ = NLG 2,50)
|
|
Pre-feasibility Study
- SENTER Internationaal
(estimates)
|
140,000 (total)
|
|
Investment
Essent Energie
(project realisation has not been finalised yet)
|
- 1,520,000
|
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other
Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the Convention. In
this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of endogenous capacities
and technologies of developing country Parties
The economic effects can be divided in city, regional and national levels:
-
City level - Having applied modern, energy efficient and environmental friendly technologies in the modern
boiler house, properly isolated underground heating pipe- lines, substations and heat meters in each building,
increases fuel consumption efficiency, reduces heat losses in the links of whole the centralized heating system
and considerably reduces environmental pollution.
-
Regional level – The use of local fuel increases employment around Ludza city and reduces
environmental pollution with wood residues. Additional incomes will give a possibility for wood processing plants
and local forestry companies to diversify markets and develop production further.
-
National level – Imported fuel (mazut) substitution by local fuel (wood residues) reduces capital
flow out of the state, thus, letting it "work" in Latvia. The demonstration pilot project provide a
transfer of technology which will provide:
- a higher standard of education of the population;
- a way to disseminate the technology of fuel switching.
When the technology of fuel switching will be used in a great part of Latvia, it is possible that the international
co-operation between different countries will be intensified.
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties, effects,
impacts or other obstacles encountered
Fill in as appropriate:
1) Any practical experience gained:
- The boiler house manager and operational staff are in general pleased with the new installations. The project
realisation has however not been realised yet for 100%, because necessary changes in:
- The wood boiler system must be changed, in order to meet the nameplated capacity
- The storage facilities for wood residues must be optimalised, to reduce the impact of snow and ice on the
performance
- The above mentioned improvements will be done in 2001.
2) Technical difficulties:
It was difficult to reach full capacity in the first months of operation on biomass boiler. It depends also on the
quality of the wood residues. To cover the heat demand additional diesel fuel has been used, so that the heat
supply towards the heat distribution system was secured.
3) Negative impacts and/or effects encountered:
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
In general the environment benefits from the new installation. Reduction of air pollution as well as no
soil pollution. Also safety has been improved a lot. Possible negative effects are increased traffic from
trucks and potential wood particles in the air. Positive is that the landfilling of wood residues is
reduced, as a new purpose is found.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental negative impacts/effects?
|
Not yet, improved covering of wood residues storage will likely reduce the wood residues particles.
Improved logistic plan will also reduce the amount of truck traffic to the site.
|
|
Describe social/cultural negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
Although a significant reduction in heat production costs has been realised, this is not directly visible
for the population, as a large part of the previous heat costs were subsidised.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social negative impacts/effects?
|
Yes/no
An representative survey has been carried out in May 2001.
|
|
Describe economic negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
Negative impact only to the suppliers of heavy fuel oil products
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic negative impacts/effects?
|
No
|
4) Other obstacles encountered:
5) Other:
|