NEGOTIATIONS
FOCUS
PROCESS
KEY STEPS
|
|
Your location: Home |
|
|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
|
USIJI Uniform Reporting Document:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
List of
Projects
A. Description of the AIJ project
1. Title of project: Reduced Impact Logging() for Carbon Sequestration in East Kalimantan
2. Host country: Republic of Indonesia
3. Brief project description:
- This project will implement reduced-impact logging techniques (RIL) to reduce net greenhouse gas
emissions associated with logging practices in East Kalimantan on the island of Borneo. The project
involves the development of guidelines and procedures for implementing RIL techniques, on-site training in
directional felling, and the implementation of RIL techniques on a total of 600 hectares (ha) of forested
land targeted for imminent harvesting. Special strategies, including collaborative planning and management,
will be undertaken to ensure that RIL ultimately contributes to local sustainable development. This is to
ensure that the local community will gain economic benefits.
4. Participants:
|
Name of Organization or Individual
|
Country
|
|
Ministry of Environment
|
Indonesia
|
|
Ministry of Forestry and Estate Crops
|
Indonesia
|
|
Association of Indonesian Forest Concession Holders (APHI)
|
Indonesia
|
|
Institute Pertanian Bogor (IPB-Bogor Agricultural University)
|
Indonesia
|
|
Counterpart International
|
U.S.A
|
|
COPEC
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Ministry of Environment
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
LH
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
ME
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Government Regulation/ Oversight
|
|
Street
|
Jl. D.I Pandjaitan Kav. 24
Kebon Nanas Jatinegara
|
|
City
|
Jakarta Timur
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
13410
|
|
Country
|
Indonesia
|
|
Telephone
|
(62) 21 851 8138
|
|
Fax
|
(62) 21 858 0111
|
|
E-mail
|
climate@cbn.net.id
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Murdiyarso
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Daniel
|
|
Job title
|
Assistant Minister and UNFCCC Focal Point
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Ministry of Forestry and Estate Crops
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
General Secretariat
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Government Regulation/ Oversight
|
|
Street
|
Gedung Manggala Wanabakti, Blok I, Lt. 3, Jl. Jend. Gatot Subroto
|
|
City
|
Senayan-Jakarta Pusat
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Indonesia
|
|
Telephone
|
(62) 21 570 0232
|
|
Fax
|
(62) 21 573 8732
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Suripto, SH
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
Secretary General
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Association of Indonesian Forest Concession Holders
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
APHI
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project administration, monitoring
|
|
Street
|
Gedung Manggala Wanabakti, Blok IV, Lt. 9, Wing B, JI. Jend. Gatot Subroto
|
|
City
|
Senayan, Jakarta
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
10270
|
|
Country
|
Indonesia
|
|
Telephone
|
(62) 21 570 1154/ 21 527 2086
|
|
Fax
|
(62) 21 573 2564
|
|
E-mail
|
aphijkt@cbn.net.id
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Robianto
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
Director, Foreign Affairs Department
|
|
Direct telephone
|
(62) 0816 811431
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Counterpart International
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
Climate Change Program
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project Development, Project Administration, Financing
|
|
Street
|
1200 18th Street NW, #1100
|
|
City
|
Washington
|
|
State
|
DC
|
|
Post code
|
20036
|
|
Country
|
USA
|
|
Telephone
|
202-296-9676
|
|
Fax
|
202-296-9679
|
|
E-mail
|
bbeehler@counterpart.org
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
www.counterpart.org
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Beehler
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Bruce
|
|
Job title
|
VP, Department of Environment and Natural Resources
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
DiNicola
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Anthony
|
|
Job title
|
Manager, Climate Change Program
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
tdinicola@counterpart.org
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Institute Pertanian Bogor
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Bogor Agricultural University
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
IPB
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Monitoring/ Verification, Technical Assistance
|
|
Street
|
Kampus IPB Darmaga
PO Box 243
|
|
City
|
Bogor
|
|
State
|
Java Barat
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Indonesia
|
|
Telephone
|
(62) 251 621262
|
|
Fax
|
(62) 251-622134
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Boer
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Rizaldi
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
<<A href="mailto:r_boer@altavista.net">r_boer@altavista.net>
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
COPEC
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
(Same as above)
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project Development, Project Administration, Financing
|
|
Street
|
225 Madeline Dr.
|
|
City
|
Pasadena
|
|
State
|
California
|
|
Post code
|
91105
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
626-799-9059
|
|
Fax
|
626-799-1069
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Jones
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Don Justin
|
|
Job title
|
Managing Director
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
djustinjones@earthlink.net
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
-
5. Description of AIJ project activities:
|
Item
|
|
|
Type of Project
|
|
Sector(s)
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Reduced impact logging
|
|
Project Location
|
|
Country
|
Republic of Indonesia
|
|
Exact location (city, state, region)
|
East Kalimantan (Northeast)
Exact site identified to be identified by APHI
|
|
Key Dates and Current Stage of Project
|
|
Project starting date (month/year)
|
Date dependent on funding
|
|
Project ending date (month/year)
|
Date dependent on funding
|
|
Project lifetime (years)
|
40
|
|
Current stage of project
|
Mutually agreed
|
|
General Project Description and Technical Data
|
|
This project will implement reduced-impact logging techniques (RIL) to decrease net greenhouse gas
emissions associated with logging practices in East Kalimantan on the island of Borneo. The project
involves the development of guidelines and procedures for implementation of RIL techniques, on-site
training in directional felling, and implementation of RIL techniques.
RIL will be implemented in East Kalimantan at a site to be determined by APHI and other
stakeholders. The site will meet the criteria as outlined in the original USIJI submission. The
forest is lowland dipterocarp forests, which have not been previously harvested. On-site training
will be conducted in RIL techniques, followed by implementation of these techniques. RIL can reduce
logging damage by as much as 50% through pre-cutting vines, directional felling, and planned
extraction of timber on properly constructed and utilized skid trails. RIL techniques have been
successfully implemented in neighboring Malaysia, particularly collaborative planning where
population is not dense.
In implementing this project, special emphasis and strategies will be undertaken to ensure that the
project results in sustainable development as defined by the local people. This will include
stakeholder consultation and stakeholder involvement in the project itself.
|
|
Methodology for Calculating Cost Data
|
|
The estimated cost of implementing RIL in Kalimantan, Indonesia was developed based on the
assumption that the costs and carbon-saving benefits in East Kalimantan are similar to that of
Sabah, Malaysia. Research was conducted to support pilot projects in southeastern Sabah, Malaysia
in 1992, in which a power company provided funds to a timber concessionaire to implement guidelines
aimed at reducing logging damage. Based on this research, Pinard and Putz (in Retaining Forest
Biomass by Reducing Logging Damage in Biotropica 28(3):278-295) estimated that it would cost
US$300 per ha to implement RIL guidelines in dipterocarp forests in Sabah.
The cost of applying RIL techniques to 600 ha (at approximately $550 per ha including project
development, verification and training) in East Kalimantan concessions is estimated to be $330,000.
The cost per tonne of carbon is estimated to be $5. This estimate is based on the project
development and implementation costs divided by the GHG benefits. The project development costs are
considered confidential by the project developer.
|
-
(b) Cost data–Project development
This information is considered confidential by the developer and therefore is not available.
(c) Cost data–Project implementation
Annual implementation cost information is not yet available.
Itemized Project Implementation Costs
|
Year(s)
|
Item
|
Projected Amount
(US$)
|
|
Project Costs
|
|
|
RIL Implementation
|
330,000
|
|
Subtotal
|
330,000
|
|
Project Revenues
|
|
|
No information is available.
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
0
|
|
Net Project Cost (Project Costs-Project Revenues)
|
330,000
|
-
7. Monitoring and verification of AIJ project activities and results:
|
Item
|
|
|
Party(ies) that will be monitoring project activities
|
Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) participants (see below)
|
|
Party(ies) that will be externally verifying project results
|
Institute Pertanian Bogor (IPB-Bogor Agricultural University)
|
|
Date when the monitoring plan became (or will become) operational (month/year)
|
3 months after project implementation begins
|
|
Types of data that will be collected
|
Biomass density, biomass growth rate, timber extraction volumes, residual damage, and soil carbon
content
|
|
Description of Monitoring and Verification Activities and Schedule for Implementation
|
|
Monitoring of project results and compliance with RIL guidelines will be carried out by an
Environmental Audit Committee (EAC), which will meet at the project site on an annual basis for the
length of the project (40 years). The EAC will be comprised of individuals external to, but
selected by the hosts and principal investors in the project. The host and principal investors each
choose one member of the EAC and then select a third forest harvesting expert by mutual agreement.
This group will then choose additional members from adjacent local areas to assess technical and
socio-economic impacts.
Foresters will carry out field measurements necessary to monitor actual CO2 emission
reduction and enhanced sequestration from RIL. All data produced will continue to be peer reviewed
and published in appropriate academic journals. Monitoring will be conducted during the period in
which all 600 ha of the project area have been harvested, and then will continue at lower intensity
over the project lifetime. Future updates of CO2 projections will continue to be based
on field measurements of established plots.
Project proponents are jointly responsible for ensuring that RIL areas are protected over the life
of the project. Contractual terms will be established to monitor over the long term.
Researchers plan to monitor the hydrological effects of RIL in comparison to conventional logging
in the study area. Studies of the biodiversity consequences of RIL are also planned.
External verification will be carried out by IPB on an annual basis.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Please check one of the following.
|
This report is a first report.
Or
This report is an intermediate report.
Or
This report is a final report.
|
|
Please check one of the following:
|
This report is a joint report. Letter(s) of approval of this report from the designated national
authority of the other Party(ies) involved in the activity is(are) attached in Section J, Annex.
Or
This report is a separate report.
|
|
Additional comments (if any):
|
|
-
C. Compatibility with, and supportiveness of, national economic development and socioeconomic and
environmental priorities and strategies
|
Compatibility with Economic Development and Socioeconomic and Environmental Priorities
|
|
The forestry industry in Indonesia manages over 60 million ha of production forest. The anticipated
standardization of certification guidelines after 2000 could have a significant impact on the
Indonesian economy. This project will build local capacity to understand and implement sustainable
logging systems in preparing for certification standards. This project will also allow companies to
begin meeting these standards and accessing niche certification markets in the U.S., Japan, and
Europe.
|
-
D. Environmental, social/cultural, and economic impacts of the AIJ project
|
Non-Greenhouse-Gas Environmental Impacts of the Project
|
|
Through the reduction of forest damage by 50% relative to conventional logging, the project will
enhance the sustainability of logging operations, improve the growth of residual trees, and
encourage more rapid natural regeneration throughout much of the RIL area. Maintenance of forest
cover and protection of surface soils from bulldozer damage will reduce rates of erosion.
Preliminary studies suggest that by controlling the logging process, populations of understory
birds (considered to be good "indicator species") will be maintained; the same species
suffer greatly in conventionally harvested areas.
|
|
Social/Cultural Impacts of the Project
|
|
As RIL is intended to promote sustainable development (biodiversity, carbon, lower "annual
allowable cuts"), it is expected that RIL carried out by industrial concessionaires will have
a positive impact and serve as a model of how sustainable forestry can deliver local sustainable
development benefits.
|
|
Economic Impacts of the Project
|
|
There are no data to suggest or reasons to suspect that implementation of RIL guidelines will
affect local or regional supply, demand, or price of timber products. Improved market access or
price premiums may result if the area is certified by an accredited agency and is well managed.
Employment of local people will be a priority.
|
-
E. Greenhouse gas impacts of the AIJ project
1. Scenario description
|
Item
|
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
1 of 1
|
|
Site name/designation
|
East Kalimantan
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Conventional logging
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
Current logging practices in East Kalimantan involve felling trees in random directions, due in
part to the trees being literally tied together by vines, and extraction by bulldozers, which
results in damage to both the residual stand and the soil. Studies in neighboring Malaysia indicate
that these conventional logging practices break and uproot as many as 50% of the remaining trees
and disturb soils on up to 40% of the land area. The Malaysian studies found that harvesting as few
as 10 to 15 trees per ha released as much as 300 - 350 t CO2. In the absence of the
project, uncontrolled and destructive logging practices are expected to continue in East Kalimantan
concessions. Logging with conventional techniques is assumed to occur once, within one year, during
the project lifetime.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Reduced impact logging
|
|
Description:
The project will develop and implement reduced impact logging practices on 600 ha within the
Intracawood concession. RIL is expected to reduce logging damage by as much as 50% through
pre-cutting vines, directional felling, and planned extraction of timber on properly constructed
and utilized skid trails. Logging with RIL techniques is assumed to occur once during the project
lifetime. Data developed in Malaysia show that there will be reduced CO2 emissions and
enhanced sequestration in RIL harvested areas for decades. Even following a second harvest
utilizing RIL techniques, occurring in 30 to 60 years after the first forest harvest, the
CO2 benefits remain positive relative to conventional logging. RIL techniques also
reduce the susceptibility of the forest to weed infestations that reduce biomass recovery rates,
and lessen the susceptibility to destructive fires. In addition, reducing the amount of the forest
canopy that is opened up will lessen the impacts of changes in temperature, light intensity, wind
speed, and moisture on understory plants and animals. Measures to protect future crop trees, and to
provide incentives to fellers and skidder operators to reduce damage to the forest will also be
taken.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Description:
This information is not yet available.
|
-
2. GHG emission/sequestration calculation methodology
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
1 of 1
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
The methodology used to estimate annual net CO2 emissions tracks carbon in above- and
belowground biomass and in wood products over the 40-year lifetime of the project. Following
harvest in year one, portions of the wood harvest and on-site damaged biomass are assumed to decay
at varying rates depending upon fate (i.e., wastewood at the mill, wood products, or on-site
logging debris), and residual living biomass on site is assumed to grow and accumulate carbon. Soil
carbon stocks are assumed to remain constant, and there are no post-harvest silviculture treatments
or forest fires. The assumptions used in the calculations (e.g., biomass carbon stocks, the timber
extraction volume and allocations to decay pools, residual damage, rates of decay, and biomass
growth rates) are based on studies of conventional logging practices in lowland dipterocarp forests
of Sabah, Malaysia.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
Under the project scenario, RIL techniques are assumed to be used on 85% of the 600 ha site; 15% of
the site is assumed to be "unloggable because of restriction in the RIL guidelines"
(e.g., buffer zones, steep slopes). Carbon stocks on the unlogged portion are assumed to remain
constant throughout the lifetime of the project. Carbon stocks in the remainder of the project site
are tracked in the same way as in the reference scenario, except that the assumptions used in the
calculations (e.g., timber extraction volumes, residual damage, biomass growth rates) are based on
studies of RIL in lowland dipterocarp forests of Malaysia.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
-
3. GHG emission/sequestration data
-
(a) Reporting of GHG emissions/sequestration
|
Projected Greenhouse Gas Benefits by Project Site
(Tonnes, Full Molecular Weight Basis)
|
|
Site Number: 1 of 1
|
|
Reference Scenario
Emissions
|
Project Scenario
Emissions
|
Net GHG Benefits
(Reference Scenario -
Project Scenario)
|
Cumulative GHG Benefits
(Reference Scenario -
Project Scenario)
|
|
Year
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
CO2-
Equivalent
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
CO2-
Equivalent
|
|
23
|
-3,615
|
|
|
-3,933
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
318
|
65,923
|
|
|
65,923
|
|
24
|
-3,756
|
|
|
-4,039
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
283
|
66,206
|
|
|
66,206
|
|
25
|
-3,897
|
|
|
-4,145
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
248
|
66,454
|
|
|
66,454
|
|
26
|
-4,027
|
|
|
-4,251
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
224
|
66,678
|
|
|
66,678
|
|
27
|
-4,156
|
|
|
-4,352
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
195
|
66,874
|
|
|
66,874
|
|
28
|
-4,281
|
|
|
-4,453
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
172
|
67,046
|
|
|
67,046
|
|
29
|
-4,405
|
|
|
-4,550
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
144
|
67,190
|
|
|
67,190
|
|
30
|
-4,530
|
|
|
-4,646
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
116
|
67,306
|
|
|
67,306
|
|
31
|
-4,649
|
|
|
-4,743
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
94
|
67,400
|
|
|
67,400
|
|
32
|
-4,773
|
|
|
-4,839
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
66
|
67,466
|
|
|
67,466
|
|
33
|
-4,887
|
|
|
-4,931
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
44
|
67,511
|
|
|
67,511
|
|
34
|
-5,006
|
|
|
-5,028
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
22
|
67,533
|
|
|
67,533
|
|
35
|
-5,120
|
|
|
-5,120
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
67,533
|
|
|
67,533
|
|
36
|
-5,233
|
|
|
-5,212
|
|
|
-21
|
|
|
-21
|
67,511
|
|
|
67,511
|
|
37
|
-5,352
|
|
|
-5,304
|
|
|
-48
|
|
|
-48
|
67,463
|
|
|
67,463
|
|
38
|
-5,466
|
|
|
-5,396
|
|
|
-70
|
|
|
-70
|
67,393
|
|
|
67,393
|
|
39
|
-5,574
|
|
|
-5,483
|
|
|
-91
|
|
|
-91
|
67,302
|
|
|
67,302
|
|
40
|
-5,688
|
|
|
-5,575
|
|
|
-113
|
|
|
-113
|
67,189
|
|
|
67,189
|
|
Total
|
-42,360
|
|
|
-109,549
|
|
|
67,189
|
|
|
67,189
|
67,189
|
|
|
67,189
|
|
Projected Net Greenhouse Gas Benefits: All Project Sites
(Tonnes, Full Molecular Weight Basis)
|
|
Please specify: Year 1 = Date dependent on funding
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|