NEGOTIATIONS
FOCUS
PROCESS
KEY STEPS
|
|
Your location: Home |
|
|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
|
Uniform Reporting Format:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
List of Projects
A. Description of the AIJ project
-
1. Title of project: Atlantic Methanol Production Company (AMPCO) – Environmentally
Responsible Gas Processing on Bioko Island
2. Host country: Equatorial Guinea
3. Brief project description:
- The project will reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by utilizing gas that is currently, and
would otherwise, be flared into the atmosphere at an approximate rate of between 88 – 120 million
cubic feet per day for the production of methanol.
4. Participants:
|
Name of Organization or Individual
|
Country
|
|
Government of Equatorial Guinea
|
Equatorial Guinea
|
|
CMS Energy
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Samedan
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Government of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Same
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
None
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
GREG
|
|
Department
|
Ministry of Energy and Mines
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Financing
|
|
Street
|
C/o Embassy of the Republic of Equatorial Guinea
2020 16th Street, NW
|
|
City
|
Washington
|
|
State
|
DC
|
|
Post code
|
20009
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
(202) 518-5700
|
|
Fax
|
(202) 518-5252
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Nsue
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Teodoro Biyogo
|
|
Job title
|
Ambassador to the United States
|
|
Direct telephone
|
(202) 518-5700
|
|
Direct fax
|
(202) 518-5252
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Same
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Samedan Oil Company
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Same
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
None
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
None
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project administration, and financing
|
|
Street
|
350 Glenborough
Suite 300
|
|
City
|
Houston
|
|
State
|
Texas
|
|
Post code
|
77067
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
(281) 876-6200
|
|
Fax
|
(281) 876-6153
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
www.samedan.com
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Cook
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Rodney
|
|
Job title
|
Manager of International Operations
|
|
Direct telephone
|
Same
|
|
Direct fax
|
Same
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
rcook@samedan.com
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Same
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
CMS Energy
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Same
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
None
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
None
|
|
Department
|
CMS Oil and Gas Company
CMS Gas Transmission Storage Company
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project development, administration, and financing
|
|
Street
|
Fairlane Plaza South
330 Town Center Drive
Suite 1100
|
|
City
|
Dearborn
|
|
State
|
Michigan
|
|
Post code
|
48126
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
(313) 436-3600
|
|
Fax
|
(202) 223-6178
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
www.cmsenergy.com
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Pickart
|
|
First name, middle name
|
George Anthony
|
|
Job title
|
International Affairs Director
|
|
Direct telephone
|
(202) 293-5794
|
|
Direct fax
|
(202) 223-6178
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
gapickart@cmsenergy.com
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Same
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
-
5. Description of AIJ project activities
|
Item
|
|
|
Type of Project
|
|
Sector(s)
|
Energy
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Utilization of flared gas
|
|
Project Location
|
|
Country
|
Equatorial Guinea
|
|
Exact location (city, state, region)
|
Punta Europa, Bioko Island
|
|
Key Dates and Current Stage of Project
|
|
Project starting date (month/year)
|
May 2001
|
|
Project ending date (month/year)
|
May 2026
|
|
Project lifetime (years)
|
25
|
|
Current stage of project
|
In progress
|
|
General Project Description and Technical Data
|
|
The Atlantic Methanol Production Company is constructing a methanol production facility
adjacent to an existing gas processing facility on the northern coast of Bioko Island,
Equatorial Guinea. Residue gas (dry methane) has been flared at the exit of the gas processing
facility initially at a rate of approximately 88 million cubic feet per day (mmcf/d) to the
current volume of approximately 125 mmcf/d. This flared gas will be converted by the new plant
into methanol, which will be exported for sale on the international market.
The projected greenhouse gas reductions that result from the flared gas being manufactured into
a useful product are 2.85 million metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalents per year for each
year of the project. The project will monitor gas coming into the plant and methanol being
produced. From this data, GHG emissions associated with the operation can be subtracted from
the calculated GHG reductions.
|
-
6. Cost
-
(a) Explanation of methodology for calculating cost data
|
Methodology for Calculating Cost Data
|
|
The nature of the costs involved in developing the AIJ project include:
Nature of Costs
Specific Costs
Methodology for Costs Estimates
Application development
Technical personnel
Time and Materials
ERT consulting
Time and Travel
Travel to Washington D.C
Travel
Monitoring Plan Development
Technical Personnel
Time and Materials
Monitoring Equipment
Equipment
Bid Estimates
Monitoring Plan Implementation
Technical personnel
Time and Materials
|
-
(b) Cost data–Project development
Itemized Project Development Costs
(Not Available)
-
7. Monitoring and verification of AIJ project activities and results
|
Item
|
Please Complete
|
|
Party(ies) that will be monitoring project activities
|
CMS Energy, Samedan, GREG, and Environmental Resources Trust, Inc.
|
|
Party(ies) that will be externally verifying project results
|
Environmental Resources Trust, Inc.
|
|
Date when the monitoring plan became (or will become) operational (month/year)
|
2nd Quarter, 2001
|
|
Types of data that will be collected
|
Fuel flow and combustion efficiency
|
|
Description of Monitoring and Verification Activities and Schedule for Implementation
|
|
The monitoring will be performed by AMPCo plant personnel and verified by Environmental
Resources Trust Inc. Monitoring will commence with plant start-up scheduled to begin in May
2001. Fuel flow at many strategic points within the plant will allow the determination of GHG
emissions and reductions.
|
|
Item
|
Please Complete
|
|
Please check one of the following.
|
This report is a first report.
or
This report is an intermediate report.
or
This report is a final report.
|
|
Please check one of the following:
|
This report is a joint report. Letter(s) of approval of this report from the designated
national authority of the other Party(ies) involved in the activity is(are) attached in Section
J, Annex.
or
This report is a separate report.
|
|
Additional comments (if any):
|
|
-
C. Compatibility with, and supportiveness of, national economic development and socioeconomic and
environmental priorities and strategies
|
Compatibility with Economic Development and Socioeconomic and Environmental Priorities
|
|
The project will help to build developmental capacity and have a substantial positive effect on
Equatorial Guinea’s economic growth and social progress. The partners, for instance, have
worked effectively to establish a new and productive dialogue between the Overseas Private
Investment Corporation, the US State Department, and the Government of Equatorial Guinea to lay
the groundwork for substantial progress in the areas of labor and workers rights. This dialogue
has already produced both verbal and written commitments by the President of Equatorial Guinea
to senior State Department officials that the government will institute new programs and
policies to shore up labor and workers rights protections. These commitments are a direct
result of the partners’ efforts and will be implemented, monitored and sustained through
the life of the AMPCO project.
In addition, the advent of the AMPCO methanol project, the first large onshore facility in the
country, brought expansive new opportunities to Equatorial Guinea for local employment. The
project emerged as a foundation for new and progressive government policies and practices on
local employment, which the partners have supported and embraced.
When operational, the plant will employ approximately 220 to 240 people total, of which roughly
140 will be skilled, professional staff. The partners will work very closely with the
government of Equatorial Guinea to ensure that there will be a strong initial commitment to
hiring local workers, and that the percentage of local workers will increase in significant
fashion over the first five years of operation. As part of that effort, the partners have
committed to a comprehensive training and education effort, which will produce a highly
advanced, and technical labor pool, with an emphasis on vocational specialties, operations and
maintenance, safety and language skills. These skilled workers will in turn be available for
other US and foreign investors, and as additional investment accrues their ranks will grow.
The AMPCO and Alba partners are committed to good corporate citizenship and are undertaking a
number of activities beyond their contractual obligations in Equatorial Guinea to benefit the
community and its people. These projects are funded through corporate contributions, or are
structured so that they will be funded from royalties from the project so that profits are
returned directly to the people. As an example of some of these activities, the partners have:
- Developed, constructed and begun operation of a 10-MW power plant on Bioko Island to meet
all power requirements for the island, at a cost of more than $12 million. The partners conduct
ongoing meetings with the Ministry of Mines and the local power company to assist with
electrical power for Malabo. The partners also have undertaken a program to clear and maintain
all power transmission lines from the hydroelectric plant in Riaba, at a current cost of
$20,000 per month;
- Made a $425,000 commitment to construct a local market on the mainland;
- Contributed $200,000 to construct a temporary bridge on the road between the airport and
Malabo that was washed out by a flood, and contributed $750,000 for the construction of a
permanent bridge. The partners have also agreed to participate in the reconstruction of the
entire road;
- Purchased two vehicles at $36,000 and provided two drivers and chemicals to conduct a
malaria spraying program in Malabo five or more nights per week;
- Provided $45,000 in equipment and in-kind assistance to construct facilities and provide
street lighting and electricity in advance of an international conference;
- Initiated discussions with US universities for extension programs to supplement the
company’s training and vocational education effort;
- Provided books and supplies for local schoolchildren.
|
|
The partners have supported and will continue to support international non-governmental and
other organizations that promote democratic ideals and principles through education and support
for democratic systems in Equatorial Guinea. CMS Energy provided a $10,000 grant to the
International Federation for Electoral Systems (IFES) to support the establishment and
operations of an Elections Observer Mission for Equatorial Guinea’s most recent
presidential election. CMS Energy similarly provided $7,500 to the Institute for Democratic
Strategies (IDS) in support of a multifaceted democratization program in Equatorial Guinea.
These projects are illustrative of the fact that the partners undertake a commitment to social
responsibility in the community they serve. The partners exercise and encourage responsible and
ethical business practices in all of dealings with customers, local partners, vendors, and
suppliers. The partners continually seek to observe certain fundamental values in their
interaction with local and national leaders, opinion-makers, and government officials,
including adherence to the rule of law, tolerance, and respect.
The partners also promote the establishment of greater transparency in business transactions,
the development of sound and open regulatory regimes and practices, and the adoption of
policies and laws that encourage free market principles.
|
-
D. Environmental, social/cultural, and economic impacts of the AIJ project
|
Non-Greenhouse-Gas Environmental Impacts of the Project
|
- 1. AMPCO as part of its initial development is creating new environmental (or health and
safety) policies or procedures. These are to be based on the current environmental, health and
safety policies the two majority partners (CMS and SAMEDAN) have in place as individual
companies and will be implemented through the Operational and Maintenance Manual for the plant
once construction has been completed. These policies and procedures will reflect recognized
environmental, health and safety standards and industrial codes of good practice as specified
and agreed to in the Manufacturing and Marketing Agreement with Equatorial Guinea.
The Turnkey Agreement for the methanol plan project sets out contract and requirement for
the design, construction and test operation of the plant. It outlines, a minimum compliance
with the following standards and specifications:
- OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Association, US Department of Labor),
- NFPA (US National Fire Protection Association); and
- World Bank environmental guidelines
- 2. The procedures specifically developed for environmental protection on construction sites
include hazardous waste management, pollution prevention, spill prevention, control and
countermeasure (SPCC); spill response; storm water management; used oil management; recycling;
and waste management. AMPCO’s contractor requires that all of their sub-contractors
operate within the construction, environmental, health and safety policies and procedures
unless the company operates under a more stringent system.
3. Daily site walkovers are undertaken by the Environmental, Health & Safety (EH&S)
Officer to monitor the implementation of general safety procedures throughout the project
site and to ensure that good "housekeeping" is generally maintained. Weekly
meetings attend by all on-site company representatives are held where, in addition to
progress assessment, environmental and health and safety issued are discussed.
4. Currently setting up procedures, work practices and standards for application at
managerial and working levels on site - including plant modifications/design safety
procedures, site safety procedures; environmental procedures and health and hygiene. The
environmental procedures will address, for example, the control and disposal of wastes,
effluent discharges and emission to air, protection of sensitive areas, spill prevention
and response, soil protection, storage and disposal, environmental monitoring and
assessment, noise surveys.
5. Project medical facilities will contribute to local medical infrastructure.
6. The Project has provided to the USIJI a copy of the Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) that was developed to support the project. The EIA has been posted on the Overseas
Private Invest Corporation’s web page for the required 60-day period in which no
third party comments were received. A copy of the EIA has been provided to the USIJI
Technical Review Committee under separate cover.
7. In terms of localized air quality the methanol plant is predicted not to represent a
significant adverse effect on the adjacent area, due to the predicted pollutant
concentrations being well within air quality criteria, the isolation of the site, the
sparse population present and prevailing wind direction. Dust generation will be minimal
once construction has ceased. In addition, the large reduction of GHG associated with the
extinguishing of the existing ground flare will yield a substantial positive local and
global impact.
With regard to water quality, there will remain a risk of some form of surface water and
marine water contamination through unexpected events such as failure of water treatment
units, containment measures, and emergency situations. However, methanol has low acute
toxicity to aquatic organisms. Application of good environmental management practices,
maintenance of equipment and protective structures and training should help minimize the
occurrence of a release and the significance of the consequences. A full time environmental
engineer will be employed to implement best management practices and follow plant
environmental procedures aimed at protecting the environment.
8. The consequences of accidental release of methanol to the ground are considered
insignificant. Biodegradation is the major route of removal of methanol from soil. Several
species of methylobacterium and methylomonas are capable of utilizing methanol as a sole
carbon source.
9. Increased shipping will be expected to have a moderate overall net adverse effect in
terms of risk of impacts associated with spills of substances such as oil, methanol and
discharges of ballast/bilge water. Minor or major methanol spills are expected to have
limited short term and long terms adverse environmental effects on account of the chemical
properties of methanol which facilitate rapid dilution and biodegradation.
10. It is predicted that there would be no adverse noise impact at Mongola village or at
the property boundary. A minor adverse impact is likely to remain within the site from
plant activity, in particular at the nearest accommodation blocks (these are expected to be
moth-balled until the maintenance/shut down periods) and administration office to the
methanol plant, after accounting for additional mitigation measures.
11. Due to the potential negative health effects of methanol exposure, all employees will
be given awareness training.
12. Disposal of solid waste will be at approved facilities by qualified contractors or
carriers, both during construction and throughout the operating life of the plant.
13. Small amounts of hazardous materials may be generated. They will be disposed of through
licensed disposal services.
Based on the information contained in the EIA and the Operating and Maintenance procedures, the
project is confident that the environmental impacts are negligible compared to the positive
impacts of GHG emission reductions.
|
|
Social/Cultural Impacts of the Project
|
|
The project will engender social progress consistent with the development impacts described
above, and will contribute to the development of the capabilities and professionalism of the
indigenous workforce.
|
|
Economic Impacts of the Project
|
|
The project will have a substantial positive economic impact by creating a productive use for
gas for which there had been no market and that previously had been flared as a by-product. The
project will establish a new industry in Equatorial Guinea and help to strengthen and diversify
the country’s export base.
|
-
E. Greenhouse gas impacts of the AIJ project
1. Scenario description
|
Item
|
Please Complete for Each Site
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
1
|
|
Site name/designation
|
Atlantic Methanol Production Co. (AMPCO)
|
|
Project sector
|
Energy
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Flaring Natural Gas
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
Rich natural gas is extracted from the Alba field, off the coast of the island of Bioko,
Equatorial Guinea, and the condensate removed at an onshore processing plant. The resultant
natural gas is disposed of by flaring. To utilize the natural gas the AMPCO Methanol Plant is
being constructed. To support the plant, the Alba field was expanded to provide additional
natural gas and to provide additional LPG. 30.67 Mtonnes/yr of methane was flared in the
Reference case. Diversion of the flared gas to the methanol plant is assumed to occur for the
next 25 years.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Utilization of Natural Gas Previously Flared
|
|
Description:
The construction of the Methanol Plant on the island of Bioko, Equatorial Guinea will allow the
termination of flaring of natural gas from the Punta Europa LPG plant. The operation of the
Methanol plant is scheduled to commence in May 2001. At this time, the utilization of
previously flared natural gas will used to manufacture methanol. Greenhouse gas emission
reductions will occur as a result of the termination of the ground flaring of natural gas. Some
greenhouse gas emissions will occur as a result of the methanol plant operation.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
This information is not yet available
|
|
Description:
|
-
2. GHG emission/sequestration calculation methodology
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
1
|
|
Project sector
|
Energy
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
The GHG emissions associated with the flaring of waste natural gas in a ground flare were
calculated based on the ideal gas law and an assumption that the ground flare was 85%
efficient. Assuming 29 bcf/yr of natural gas is combusted in the ground flare;
0.85 * 29 bcf/yr * 44lb CO2/lbmole = 1.36 Mtonnes CO2/yr
0.15 * 29 bcf/yr * 16 lb CH4 lbmole = 0.088 Mtonees CH4/yr
(0.088 Mtonnes CH4/yr * 21 GWP) + 1.36 Mtonnes CO2/yr = 3.20 Mtonnes
CO2 eq/yr
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
GHG emissions associated with the Project scenario include emissions from the methanol plant
flare and miscellaneous equipment resulting in emissions equal to 0.193 Mtonnes CO2
eq/yr.
Emissions associated with the construction and deforestation is equivalent to 3.98 Mtonnes
CO2 eq. These emissions are divided by 25 and spread out over the life of the
project.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
-
3. GHG emission/sequestration data
-
(a) Reporting of GHG emissions/sequestration
(Insert the following Excel spreadsheets: Site GHGs Projected, Site GHGs Actual, Total GHGs
Projected, Total GHGs Actual)
-
(b) Additional information on GHG emissions/sequestration
|
Indirect or Secondary GHG Impacts (Positive and Negative)
|
|
GHG emissions that result indirectly from the use of methanol were not considered in this AIJ
project. It is estimated that approximately 66% of the chemical grad methanol is bound up
chemically in products or feedstock. The other 34% (27% MTBE, 2.3% fuels and 4.1% solvents) is
used to meet market demands and offset other less economical supplies of MTBE, fuels and
solvents.
Production of methanol in a new facility that burns natural gas for a majority of it’s
steam and energy needs allows the GHG emissions associated with such a process to be minimized,
as natural gas emits less GHG per energy unit than any other fossil fuel used in energy or
steam production.
|
|
Factors That Could Cause the Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
Future losses of GHG reductions could occur if the natural gas supply should end prior to the
estimated life of the methanol plant (25 years).
|
|
Strategy for Reducing the Risk of Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
The strategy for reducing the risk of loss of natural gas supply to the plant will involve well
monitoring and plant operation to determine if the gas supply and the plant economics justify
well field expansion.
|
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount ($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding (%)
|
|
CMS Energy
Samedan
|
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
|
$15 mm
$15mm
|
50%
50%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
-
(b) Funding sources for project implementation
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount ($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding (%)
|
Is This Funding Assured? (Y/N)
|
|
Overseas Private Investment Corporation
|
U.S.A.
|
$173 mm
|
40%
|
Y
|
|
CMS Energy
|
U.S.A.
|
$124.7 mm
|
27%
|
Y
|
|
Samedan
|
U.S.A.
|
$124.7 mm
|
27%
|
Y
|
|
GREG
|
Eq. Guinea
|
$26.7 mm
|
6%
|
Y
|
|
Total
|
|
$450 mm
|
100
|
|
-
2. Assessment of additional funding needs:
|
Current or Planned Activities to Obtain Additional Funding
|
|
None
|
-
G. Contribution to capacity building and technology transfer
|
Contribution to Capacity Building and Technology Transfer
|
|
The project will demonstrate to Equatorial Guinea and to other countries in the West/Central
Africa region the potential benefits to utilizing stranded gas. The project will build capacity
by creating a highly skilled and professional work force among the indigenous population. The
project will introduce technology and knowledge by introducing the production of methanol to
the country.
|
-
H. Recent developments, technical difficulties, and obstacles encountered
|
Recent Project Developments
|
|
The project is under construction and expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2001.
|
|
Technical Difficulties and Other Obstacles Encountered
|
|
None.
|
-
I. Additional information
|
Additional Information
|
|
None
|
J. Annex
-
1. Host country acceptance of the AIJ project
-
2. Letters of approval of this AIJ project report:
- See attached letter of concurrence.
(concurrence letter)
|
|