NEGOTIATIONS
FOCUS
PROCESS
KEY STEPS
|
|
Your location: Home |
|
|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
|
USIJI Uniform Reporting Document:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
List of
Projects
|
Name of Organization or Individual
|
Country
|
|
Fundación Jatun Sacha
|
Ecuador
|
|
World Parks Endowment, Inc.
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Fundación Jatun Sacha
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project development, monitoring
|
|
Street
|
Avenida Rio Coca 1734
|
|
City
|
Quito
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
|
|
Country
|
Ecuador
|
|
Telephone
|
593-2-250-976
|
|
Fax
|
593-2-253-266
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
McComb
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Michael
|
|
Job title
|
Vice President
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
World Parks Endowment, Inc.
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
(same as above)
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
|
|
Street
|
1616 P Street, NW, #200
|
|
City
|
Washington
|
|
State
|
District of Columbia
|
|
Post code
|
20036
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Telephone
|
202-939-3808
|
|
Fax
|
|
|
E-mail
|
worldparks@juno.com
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Swift
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Byron
|
|
Job title
|
Executive Director
|
|
Direct telephone
|
202-939-3808
|
|
Direct fax
|
202-939-3868
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
-
5. Description of AIJ project activities:
|
Item
|
|
|
Type of Project
|
|
Sector(s)
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Forest preservation
|
|
Project Location
|
|
Country
|
Ecuador
|
|
Exact location (city, state, region)
|
Montañas de Mache, Esmeraldas Province
|
|
Key Dates and Current Stage of Project
|
|
Project starting date (month/year)
|
To be determined.
|
|
Project ending date (month/year)
|
To be determined.
|
|
Project lifetime (years)
|
30
|
|
Current stage of project
|
Mutually agreed
|
|
General Project Description and Technical Data
|
|
The project will preserve 2,000 hectares (ha) of tropical forest in the Montañas de Mache in
the Esmeraldas province of northwestern Ecuador. This will be accomplished through land purchase,
incorporation into the newly created Bilsa Biological Reserve, and subsequent management by the
Fundación Jatun Sacha, in cooperation with the government and other private entities.
Esmeraldas province has undergone heavy deforestation, with more than 99% of the lowland wet forest
already cleared in the region. This area represents the last significant opportunity to conserve
Pacific slope wet forests, as the 12,000 ha of forest remaining at Bilsa constitute the majority of
the remaining unprotected forest on the Pacific Slope. Because of the significant biodiversity in
the area, this ecosystem has been classified as one of the world’s top three hotspots for
immediate conservation action.
|
-
6. Cost:
-
(a) Explanation of methodology for calculating cost data
|
Methodology for Calculating Cost Data
|
|
Information on the methodology for calculating project development costs is not yet available.
Costs for implementing the project include the cost per hectare (US$125) to purchase the land plus
legal and titling costs (12% of purchase cost per hectare). The developer plans to purchase 1,000
acres each year for the first two years of the project, therefore total purchase costs for each of
these years is equal to US$140,000 (= 1,000 ha * US$125/ha * 1.12% legal and titling fees). In
addition, the project developer plans to establish an endowment in the third year of the project at
a cost of US$100,000.
|
Itemized Project Implementation Costs
AIJ Project Implementation Costs: Annual Basis
|
Please specify: Year 1 = To be determined
|
|
AIJ Project Cost
in US$
|
US$ per
Avoided Tonne of
CO2-Equivalent
|
|
Year
|
Projected
|
Projected
|
|
1
|
140,000.00
|
0.36
|
|
2
|
140,000.00
|
0.36
|
|
3
|
100,000.00
|
0.26
|
|
Total
|
380,000.00
|
0.32
|
-
7. Monitoring and verification of AIJ project activities and results:
|
Item
|
|
|
Party(ies) that will be monitoring project activities
|
Jatun Sacha Foundation
|
|
Party(ies) that will be externally verifying project results
|
Corporación de Conservación y Desarrollo or Biosfera (not yet confirmed)
|
|
Date when the monitoring plan became (or will become) operational (month/year)
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
Types of data that will be collected
|
Forest quality and extent
|
|
Description of Monitoring and Verification Activities and Schedule for Implementation
|
|
Monitoring will occur annually and consist of recording any reductions in forest area. Annual
reports will describe any such loss and document forest quality using photographic mapping. In
addition, carbon sequestered per unit area will be evaluated every ten years.
The project developer will allow external verification of greenhouse gas emissions and
sequestration by the USIJI Secretariat, its designees, or another agreed upon party. One potential
method to verify the continued protection of carbon stocks would be through satellite photography,
which can capture any change in the size of the forested area. The project developer hopes to
obtain satellite photos documenting the reference scenario, against which future images can be
referenced.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Please check one of the following.
|
This report is a first report.
or
This report is an intermediate report.
or
This report is a final report.
|
|
Please check one of the following:
|
This report is a joint report. Letter(s) of approval of this report from the designated national
authority of the other Party(ies) involved in the activity is (are) attached in Section J, Annex.
or
This report is a separate report.
|
|
Additional comments (if any):
|
None.
|
-
C. Compatibility with, and supportiveness of, national economic development and socioeconomic and
environmental priorities and strategies
|
Compatibility with Economic Development and Socioeconomic and Environmental Priorities
|
|
Jorge Barba González, Executive Director of the Ecuadorian Institute of Forestry, Natural
Areas, and Wildlife (INEFAN), states that Ecuador strongly supports the project because it
"contributes to national priorities in conservation and sustainable development" and
"is consistent with existing Ecuadorian investment laws and regulations." INEFAN has
declared the Mache-Chindul Mountains a protected area, indicating the high national priority to
conserve this vanishing ecosystem.
|
-
D. Environmental, social/cultural, and economic impacts of the AIJ project
|
Non-Greenhouse-Gas Environmental Impacts of the Project
|
|
The primary non-GHG environmental benefit of the project is the associated conservation of
biological diversity. The project site has been identified as one of the most important in the
world for biodiversity and endemism. In addition, the site is the last large unprotected area of
coastal wet forest in Ecuador.
|
|
Social/Cultural Impacts of the Project
|
|
The establishment of the reserve and research station is expected to provide environmental
education to the surrounding communities, thereby enhancing their potential contribution to
biodiversity conservation.
|
|
Economic Impacts of the Project
|
|
The project will have positive economic impacts on the local community by providing a more reliable
and sustainable basis of livelihood through employment at the reserve and through environmental
research and education programs. Jatun Sacha employs several dozen local people at its more
established research site in eastern Ecuador.
A tree nursery project will also contribute to reforestation and local production of fruit trees.
|
-
E. Greenhouse gas impacts of the AIJ project
1. Scenario description:
|
Item
|
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
1 of 1
|
|
Site name/designation
|
Bilsa Biological Reserve
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Deforestation of tropical forest for timber, agricultural cultivation, and cattle pasture
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
In the reference scenario, the 2,000 ha project area is expected to be deforested within three
years. The area is assumed to first undergo logging, followed by clearing and conversion. Based on
current practices in the region, three-quarters of the area is expected to be converted to marginal
cropland and the remainder to pasture.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Forest preservation
|
|
The project is anticipated to preserve the 2,000 ha of tropical forest area through its purchase
and incorporation into the newly created Bilsa Reserve. The area will be managed by the
Fundación Jatun Sacha, in cooperation with the government and other private entities. Carbon
stocks on the project area are expected to remain stable over the project lifetime.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
This information is not yet available.
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
-
2. GHG emission/sequestration calculation methodology:
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
1 of 1
|
|
Project sector
|
Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
Total carbon emissions in the reference scenario are projected to be equal to the amount of carbon
currently stored on the 2,000 ha minus the amount of carbon contained in the harvested timber and
the amount of carbon retained in soil and vegetation following deforestation.
Initial carbon stocks are estimated to be 284.64 t C/ha, which includes aboveground live vegetation
(124.06 t C/ha), aboveground woody debris and litter (10.59 t C/ha), and belowground biomass and
soil carbon (150.00 t C/ha). Logging is assumed to remove 21% of the aboveground tree biomass
stocks, which are estimated to be 112.06 t C/ha. Thus, logging removes approximately 23.53 t C/ha
(= 112.06 t C/ha * 0.21). Based on this estimate, aboveground carbon stocks at the site after
logging are estimated to be 111.12 t C/ha (= 124.06 t C/ha + 10.59 t C/ha - 23.53 t C/ha). The wood
removed during logging is assumed to be used for durable products, so this carbon is not emitted.
The amount of carbon retained by soil and vegetation following deforestation depends on the
eventual end use of the land. In the calculations, this accounting is done by applying fractions to
above- and belowground carbon stocks that represent the portions that are lost due to clearing. On
the lands converted to cropland (75% of the area), 95% of the total aboveground carbon stocks and
43% of the belowground carbon stocks are assumed to be emitted as CO2. On the lands
converted to pasture (25% of the area), 95% of the total aboveground carbon stocks and 15% of the
belowground carbon stocks are assumed to be emitted as CO2. This results in a per
hectare carbon loss estimate of 159.56 t C/ha.
Therefore, total carbon emitted in the reference scenario is projected to be equal to approximately
319,120 t C (=159.56 t C/ha * 2,000 ha). To convert to CO2, this estimate is multiplied
by the ratio of 44 t CO2/12 t C, which yields 1,170,107 t CO2. The project
developer has estimated that under the reference scenario, the 2,000 ha site would be deforested
over a three year period. To calculate annual reference scenario emissions, emissions are divided
by three years, which yields annual emissions of 390,036 t CO2/yr.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
Under the project scenario, the 2,000 ha area of forest is expected to be preserved. Since carbon
stocks on the project area are expected to remain stable, annual project scenario emissions are
estimated to be zero over the lifetime of the project.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
-
3. GHG emission/sequestration data:
-
(a) Reporting of GHG emissions/sequestration
|
Projected Net Greenhouse Gas Benefits: All Project Sites
(Tonnes, Full Molecular Weight Basis)
|
|
Site Number: 1 of 1
|
|
Sector(s): Land-use change and forestry
|
|
Project Activity(ies): Forest preservation
|
|
Year 1 = To be determined
|
|
Reference Scenario
Emissions
|
Project Scenario
Emissions
|
Net GHG Benefits
(Reference Scenario -
Project Scenario)
|
Cumulative GHG Benefits
(Reference Scenario -
Project Scenario)
|
|
Year
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
NOx
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
NOx
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
NOx
|
CO2-
Equivalent
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
NOx
|
CO2-
Equivalent
|
|
1
|
390,036
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
390,036
|
|
|
390,036
|
390,036
|
|
|
390,036
|
|
2
|
390,036
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
390,036
|
|
|
390,036
|
780,072
|
|
|
780,072
|
|
3
|
390,036
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
390,036
|
|
|
390,036
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
4
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
5
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
6
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
7
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
8
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
9
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
10
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
11
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
12
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
13
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
14
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
15
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
16
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
17
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
18
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
19
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
20
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected Net Greenhouse Gas Benefits: All Project Sites (Continued)
(Tonnes, Full Molecular Weight Basis)
|
|
Reference Scenario
Emissions
|
Project Scenario
Emissions
|
Net GHG Benefits
(Reference Scenario -
Project Scenario)
|
Cumulative GHG Benefits
(Reference Scenario -
Project Scenario)
|
|
Year
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
NOx
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
NOx
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
NOx
|
CO2-
Equivalent
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
NOx
|
CO2-
Equivalent
|
|
21
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
22
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
23
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
24
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
25
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
26
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
27
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
28
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
29
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
30
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
|
|
1,170,108
|
|
Total
|
1,170,108
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
0
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
1,170,108
|
0
|
0
|
1,170,108
|
-
(b) Additional information on GHG emissions/sequestration
|
Indirect or Secondary GHG Impacts (Positive and Negative)
|
|
None anticipated.
|
|
Factors That Could Cause the Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
The principal threat that would result in the reversal of project GHG benefits is loss of forest
cover in the reserve as a result of encroachment by farming and ranching.
|
|
Strategy for Reducing the Risk of Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
A management fund will be established to add to the resources available to the project, though the
project developer expects that the area will be self-sustaining through research and education fees
and controlled visitation. Fundación Jatun Sacha, which has a good record of protection at
its other principal site, will be responsible primarily for preventing deterioration of the
preserve.
|
|
Current or Planned Activities to Obtain Additional Funding
|
|
Funding is being sought from foundations, individuals, and electric utilities.
|
-
G. Contribution to capacity building and technology transfer
|
Contribution to Capacity Building and Technology Transfer
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
-
H. Recent developments, technical difficulties, and obstacles encountered
|
Recent Project Developments
|
|
The Bilsa Reserve has been successfully fund-raising from non-AIJ sources (i.e., charitable
donations). As a result, the reserve size has reached 2,500 ha of the planned 5,000 ha total.
|
|
Technical Difficulties and Other Obstacles Encountered
|
|
This information is not yet available.
|
-
I. Additional information
|
Additional Information
|
|
Current conservation measures at the Bilsa Reserve include forestry, extension, tree nursery
development, environmental education, community extension, and ongoing scientific research in
collaboration with several universities.
|
|
Country/Project Title
|
Name, Title, and Government Agency of the Designated National Authority
|
Date of Approval (day/month/year)
|
|
Ecuador/Bilsa Biological Reserve
|
Ximena Martinez de Perez, Minister, Subsecretary of International Organizations, Ministry of
International Relations
|
13 December 1996
|
-
2. Letters of approval of this AIJ project report:
- See attached letter of concurrence.
|
|