Your location: Home

ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
 

Uniform Reporting Format:

Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase

List of Projects

A. Description of project

A. 1) Title of project: Poland/Norway Coal-to-Gas Conversion - AlJ Pilot Project

The objectives of the project as a whole are to stimulate technological and institutional changes to demonstrate inter-fuel substitution and energy efficiency improvement as means to support the country objectives. The total project aims at encouraging and introducing more rapid transition from coal to gas and introducing more energy efficiency in residential buildings.

The total project has the following components:

  • a coal-to-gas conversion component, involving investments in about 30 non-industrial small to medium size heat plants (boilers) for their conversion from coal to natural gas. The projects are for residential houses and public buildings; the new technologies include gas fired cogeneration unit of heat and electricity, condensing boilers as well as conventional gas fired boilers;
  • an energy efficiency component, involving investments in insulation of buildings and the installation of energy efficient equipment in some hundred new residential units;
  • a technical assistance component to project participants, including institutional training, project management, environmental monitoring and nation-wide marketing.

The AIJ component of the project is funded with a grant of 1.1 million USD from the Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs of the Government of Norway. Non-AIJ related financing of the project includes grant of 25 million USD from the GEF and further 22 million USD from the Polish National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (National Fund, NF), Voivodeship Funds (VF), Environmental Protection Bank (BOS) and private investors in Poland.

The portion of the project funded by the Government of Norway functions as an AIJ demonstration project with the objective of assisting Parties to the UNFCCC in gaining experience on how the mechanism of AIJ might work. The project is administered by the World Bank and is related to other Bank operations in Poland. The GEF funding is separate from the AIJ financing.

The overall project has an estimated lifetime of 17 years and will give substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and at the same time reduce pollution. It has been planned in a manner consistent with national priorities for sustainable energy development.

A. 2) Participants/actors:

The donor country is the Government of Norway, represented by the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (RNMFA), Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs. The host is the Government of Poland, represented by the Ministry of Environment (MoE), Economic Department.

The entity responsible for co-ordination and reporting on AIJ activities in Poland is the National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (NF), JI-Secretariat. The implementing agency is the Environmental Protection Bank (BOS). Within the World Bank, the Department for Central and Eastern Europe is charged with management of the project, while the Global Environment Department assists in development of the AIJ component.

The host investors are the private boiler owners, public entities and self-governments.

Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item "Function within activity".

Item Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisationa):

Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Name of organisation (English):

Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Department:

Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function with activity:

Governmental authority responsible for committing financial resources for AIJ component and approval of AIJ project agreements and reports (foreign investor – AIJ)

Street:

Juniplassen / Victoria Terrasse

Post Code:

PO Box 8114

City:

N-0032 Oslo DEP 1

Country:

Norway

Telephone:

+47 22 24 36 03

Fax:

+47 22 23 27 82

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact Person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Bjornebye

First name, middle name:

Erik

Job title:

Head of Division

Direct tel:

+47 22 24 36 03

Direct fax:

+47 22 23 27 82

Direct E-mail:

Erik.bjornebye@ud.dep.telemax.no

  1. Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item "Function within activity".

Item Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisationa):

World Bank

Name of organisation (English):

World Bank

Department:

Carbon Offset Unit

Acronym:

WB

Acronym (English):

WB

Function within activity:

Administration of project on behalf of World Bank - GEF and the Norwegian Government

Street:

1818 H Street, N.W.

Post code:

DC 20433

City:

Washington, DC 20433

Country:

USA

Telephone:

+1 (202) 473-4279

Fax:

+1 (202) 522-3256

E-mail:

environment@worldbank.org

WWW-URL:

http://www-esd.worldbank/aij

Contact person (for this activity):

---------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Patrick

First name, middle name:

Karani

Job title:

Program Manager

Direct tel:

+1 (202) 473-4279

Direct fax:

+1 (202) 522-2130

Direct E-mail:

Pkarani@worldbank.org

  1. Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item "Function within activity".

Item Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisationa):

Ministerstwo Srodowiska

Name of organisation (English):

Ministry of Environment

Department:

Economic Department

Acronym:

MOSZNiL

Acronym (English):

MoE

Function within activity:

Host country representative

Street:

Wawelska 52/54

Post code:

00-922

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 825 00 01

Fax:

(+48 22) 825 29 73

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

http://www.mos.gov.pl

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mrs. Maliszewska

First name, middle name:

Maria

Job title:

Director of Economic Department

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 825 17 22; 825 00 01 w. 402

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 825 29 73

Direct E-mail:

maria.maliszewska@mos.gov.pl

  1. Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item "Function within activity".

Item Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisationa):

Narodowy Fundusz Ochrony Srodowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej, Sekretariat - JI

Name of organisation (English):

National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management, JI-Secretariat

Department:

Executive Office for Climate Convention

Acronym:

NFOSiGW

Acronym (English):

NF

Function within activity:

National Focal Point, Reporting agency

Street:

Konstruktorska 3A

Post code:

02-673

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 849 22 80; 849 00 80

Fax:

(+48 22) 849 20 98

E-mail:

Jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl

WWW-URL:

http://www.nfosigw.gov.pl

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mrs. Galon-Kozakiewicz, Ph.D

First name, middle name:

Jolanta

Job title:

JI-Secretariat

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 849 22 80; 849 00 80 ext. 504

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 849 20 98

Direct E-mail:

Jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl

a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item "Function within activity".

Item Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisationa):

Bank Ochrony Srodowiska SA

Name of organisation (English):

Environmental Protection Bank

Department:

Acronym:

BOS

Acronym (English):

BOS

Function within activity:

Implementing agency

Street:

Jana Pawla II 12

Post code:

00-950 Warsaw

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 850 88 05

Fax:

(+48 22) 850 88 89

E-mail:

bos_bit2@pol.pl

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Urbala, Ph.D.

First name, middle name:

Stanislaw

Job title:

Director GEF Project

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 850 89 44

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 850 88 89

Direct E-mail:

bos_bit2@pol.pl

a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

A. 3) Activity:

Name of organisation :

Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Name of organisation (English):

Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Department:

Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs

Acronym:

-

Acronym (English):

-

Function with activity:

Governmental authority responsible for committing financial resources for AIJ projects and approval of AIJ project agreements and reports (foreign investor - AIJ)

Street:

Victoria Street, P.O. Box 8114 Dep

Post Code:

0032

City:

Oslo

Country:

Norway

Telephone:

47-22 24 36 03

Fax:

47-22 24 27 82

E-mail:

-

WWW-URL:

-

Contact Person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Leiro

First name, middle name:

Jostein

Job title:

Head of Division

Direct tel:

47-22 24 36 08

Direct fax:

47-22 24 27 82

Direct E-mail:

jleiro@online.no

Item Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisation:

World Bank

Name of organisation (English):

World Bank

Department:

Environment Department

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function within activity:

Administration of project on behalf of World Bank - GEF and the Norwegian Government

Street:

1818 H Street, NW

Post code:

20433

City:

Washington DC

Country:

USA

Telephone:

(202) 473-9746

Fax:

(202) 522-3256

E-mail:

Etandberg@worldbank.org

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

---------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Tandberg

First name, middle name:

Eivind

Job title:

Advisor

Direct tel:

(202) 473-9746

Direct fax:

(202) 522-3256

Direct E-mail:

Etandberg@worldbank.org

Item Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisation:

Ministerstwo Ochrony Srodowiska, Zasobów Naturalnych i Lesnictwa

Name of organisation (English):

Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry

Department:

Department of Budget and Finance

Acronym:

MOSZNiL

Acronym (English):

MoE

Function within activity:

Host country representative

Street:

Wawelska 52/54

Post code:

00-922

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 25 00 01

Fax:

(+48 22) 25 29 73

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mrs. Chochlew

First name, middle name:

Irena

Job title:

Director, Department of Budget and Finance

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 25 00 01 ext. 402; 25 17 22

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 25 29 73

Direct E-mail:

Item Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisation:

Narodowy Fundusz Ochrony Srodowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej, Sekretariat - JI

Name of organisation (English):

National Found for Environmental Protection and Water Management, JI-Secretariat

Department:

International Department

Acronym:

NFOSiGW

Acronym (English):

NF

Function within activity:

Reporting agency

Street:

Konstruktorska 3A

Post code:

02-673

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 49 22 80; 49 00 80

Fax:

(+48 22) 49 20 98

E-mail:

jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl

WWW-URL:

http://www.nfosigw.gov.pl/

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mrs. Galon-Kozakiewicz, Ph.D

First name, middle name:

Jolanta

Job title:

Head of JI-Secretariat

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 49 22 80; 49 00 80 ext. 504

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 49 20 98

Direct E-mail:

jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl

Item Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisation:

Bank Ochrony Srodowiska SA

Name of organisation (English):

Environmental Protection Bank

Department:

Acronym:

BOS

Acronym (English):

BOS

Function within activity:

Implementing agency

Street:

Przasnyska 6A

Post code:

01-756

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 633 55 22

Fax:

(+48 22) 639 73 12

E-mail:

bos_bit@pol.pl

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Urbala, Ph.D.

First name, middle name:

Stanis³aw

Job title:

Director GEF Project

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 633 55 22 ext. 392

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 639 73 12

Direct E-mail:

bos_bit@pol.pl

All projects:

Technical data of following:

  • 2612 projects under Coal to Gas Conversion Component, updated 300th of NovemberApril 1999,
  • 9 projects under Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings Component, updated 31st of December 1999,
  • 4 projects under Coal to Gas Conversion Component are specified in list of "stand-by" projects.
Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Poland's energy economy is dominated by coal, which is domestically produced. The related greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution problems are huge.

The share of coal was 77% in 1991, while the share of oil and gas was 21%, one of the lowest in continental Europe. A shift towards an oil and gas share of 53 to 73% has been estimated by the World Bank to lead to at least 50% reduction in the carbon dioxide emissions.

One of the reasons for the widespread use of coal is the use for space heating. The use of gas for space heating was earlier prohibited and the use of oil was held back by various measures. The aim was to limit foreign exchange expenditures on energy imports. Coal for space heating is used both in district heating systems, block heating plants (heating several apartments) and in individual heating in stoves. District heating companies own about 16 GW coal fired boilers, consuming about 6 million tons of coal per year. About 3,2 GW of this capacity is, by the World Bank, considered suitable for replacement with gas fired boilers.

Removal of the direct regulation of fuel use will result in a shift from coal to gas or oil. Coal will for reasons of price remain the preferred fuel for relatively large boilers, where economies of scale offsets the higher costs of coal handling and emission control equipment. Also in small boilers, coal has until recently been the preferred fuel for economic reasons, but higher coal prices will reduce its use in the long term.

Environmental standards have been and will be further strengthened for sulphur, particulates and nitrogen oxide, and effective enforcement will be phased in over many years. This will accelerate the price-driven conversion of small boilers from coal to gas. The emission standards are administered by local authorities and linked to these is a system of fees and fines. Emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulates, as well as carbon dioxide are taxed. The fees on carbon dioxide are only of symbolic nature. The other fees could have some albeit small effects on conversions from coal to gas.

There are several obstacles to conversions from coal to gas. They include lack of access to financing, budgetary procedures of publicly owned heating companies, and lack of price incentives. Cost savings in heat production are not felt by consumers because heat prices are subsidised. Only the local authorities have a well defined interest in reducing costs but often lack the financial means for investment.

For the immediate future, the conversion of coal to gas will not be financially attractive without taking into account the global warming considerations and/or local pollution effects.The same

Description of the other Energy Efficiency Projects

Besides projects described in the Appendix III, for which BOS SA signed preliminary agreement on applying for AIJ/GEF grant with developers. These developers are cooperating with Energy Auditor. Energy Audits are expected to be completed soon.

Their projects are following:

  • 10 multifamily buildings (75 apartments and area 4168,6 m2 totally) in Gdansk - project of "Towarzystwo Inwestycyjne - Investing S.A." (the request covered 37 multifamily buildings of total amount 17553,83 m2 and 10 single family buildings - but because of too late date of completion they can not be covered by GEF grant),
  • 1 multifamily building (7-8 floors) with area of 5267 m2 and 94 apartments in Wroclaw, Ciepla 15 Street - project of „ARCHICOM" firm.
  • 2 multifamily buildings constructed by "Towarzystwo Budownictwa Spolecznego Czynszowka" from Gdynia:
  • 1 building with the area of 3342,5 m2 and 70 apartments, 8 service rooms, 4 floors and attic, Nalkowskiej Street;
  • 1 building with the area of 2766,7 m2 and 60 apartments, 1 service room, 4 floors and attic, Dembinskiego 21/37 Street.

Type of project:a)

Fuel conversion and energy efficiency measures.

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Both the Coal to Gas Conversion Component coal-to-gas component and the Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings Component housing component are located throughout Poland.

Activity starting date:

June 30, 1995

Expected activity ending date:

2002

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

26 individual projects, approved by MoE, to be modernized under the Coal-to-Gas Conversion component are at different stages of implementation:

  • 12 projects were commissioned,
  • 1 project - "turn-key" contract for realisation has been signed
  • 2 projects are at the stage of the „turn-key" contract negotiation,
  • 2 projects are after the bidding procedure before signing the „turn-key" contract (the bid evaluation reports have been transmitted to the World Bank),
  • 1 project is after the biding procedure during the bid evaluation,
  • 2 projects are after preparation of the tender document, before publishing an announcement,
  • 3 projects have been already prepared with the conceptual design,
  • for 3 projects Grant Agreements have been signed,
  • 4 projects are in the stand-by group (Jaros³aw resigned),
  • 4 next projects (3 cogeneration in this group) have been recommended by STAP for stand-by group.

Under the energy efficiency component of AIJ/GEF, 9 grant agreements were concluded and these projects are at different stages of implementation:

  • 7 projects are completed, the report on the monitoring of one of them is being prepared, for 3 of them the final amount of grant has not been calculated yet,
  • 2 projects are under construction at different stage of construction works.

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years under Coal to Gas Conversion Component;

50 years under Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings Component.

Technical data:d)

(details are available in the appendixes)

1. Financing plan

25 mill USD - GEF,

1.1 mill USD - grant from the Government of Norway – AIJ component,

22 mill USD - Poland (National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (NF), Voivodeship Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (VF), BOS, owner’s contribution (Oc))

2. Project costs

48 mill USD (35.5 mill USD - engaged funds for 1997)

3. Project cost-effectiveness

30.1 USD/tCO2* (average concerning 12 projects)See description of each individual project (Appendix I, II, III)

4. Planned environ-mental benefits

292 901 tCO2/year:

292 135141 698 tCO2/year - concerning 26 projects under Coal to Gas Conversion Component and 4 projects from the list of "stand-by" projects;

766 tCO2/year – concerning 9 projects under Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings Component(total concerning 12 projects); 3 259 tCO2/year (concerning the AIJ component of the project or 2.3% of total planned environmental benefits)..

a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.

b) Circle the appropriate option.

c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.

d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each types of activity what the minimum data requirements are.

A. 4) Cost (to the extent possible):

The project has a 1.1 million USD grant from the Government of Norway, a contribution of about 22 million USD from Poland and a 25 million USD grant from the GEF. The Polish sources for funding vary, but are most often a package of funding from the boiler owners themselves, the National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (NF), Environmental Protection Bank (BOS) and provincial authorities.

Item Year 1 Year 2 ... Year X

Cost of the project in USD:

48 mill

AIJ component in USD:

1.1 mill

USD per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:

High efficiency gas boilers

Between 11 and 43

Condensing boiler

About 60

Housing projects

Between 90 and 120

Describe briefly how costs are determined:

The value of the amount granted to the individual project was calculated, in particular:

  • additional cost of investment and exploitation of boiler during 17 years in comparison with
  • cost of new coal boiler plus a difference of cost of new condensing gas boiler as well as
  • partial cost of modernisation of heating system.

The grant will allow the boiler owners to have a profitable percentage of return of the capital.the same

A. 5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:

Describe the procedures, including name of organisations involved a):

5.1) General Agreement

The Government of Poland has received grant funds from the Government of Norway and from the GEF.

The World Bank is acting as Trustee of GEF Norwegian funds for the project.

On behalf of the Government of Poland, the Minister of EPNR&F is a grantee of this fund. The MoE, through its Department of Ecological Policy, is responsible for: (a) overall co-ordination and implementation of this project; and (b) monitoring and reviewing project activities and products to assure that they are of a high quality and are accomplished in a cost- effective and timely manner.

Recognising the complexity of Joint Implementation Program, the Minister of EPNR&F has established the Polish Secretariat for Joint Implementation in NF.

BOS is acting as the Implementing Agency for this project and as administrator of project activities and funds to be used solely for the purposes of the project.

The same

a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organisations mentioned is reported under section A.2 above.

5.2) Monitoring

The sameA monitoring plan to provide data for evaluation of the quantity of greenhouse gas emissions as well as other environmental benefits the operating costs and the energy savings have been established.

5.2.1) MONITORING OBJECTIVE

The objective of environmental monitoring for the coal-to-gas conversion component of the project is to provide data for evaluation of pollutant emission reduction, to assess effectiveness of the operating costs associated with conversion of coal fired boilers to natural gas ones and to evaluate energy saving. Monitoring should ensure detailed evaluation of revenues and benefits to be reaped from the project’s implementation.

5.2.2) COURSE OF REALISATION

To ensure use of unified data collecting procedures and their analysis, there will be one contractor selected by competitive bidding, responsible for preparation and carrying out monitoring all over the country at the realisation stage of the coal-to-gas conversion component of the project. The above mentioned contractor will implement the monitoring program under supervision of the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry (MoE) represented by the State Environmental Inspectorate (PIOS).

The latter's role will consist mainly in working out the rules for monitoring performance, approval of a monitoring implementation plan for each facility, occasional inspection of work in progress, and verification of all the reports submitted.

PIOS will supervise environmental monitoring for all the facilities involved in the project and will evaluate results obtained in effect of individual implementation of fuel conversion projects. The role of Environmental Protection Bank (BOS), which is the Implementing Agency for the project, will focus on undertaking the necessary actions ensuring that monitoring of old boilers prior to the conversion can take place before their modification and on administration and management of the pertinent activity.

5.2.3) SCOPE OF WORK

To attain the project’s objectives the contractor will undertake the following actions:

  • it will ensure taking all measurements in conformity with the Polish standards,
  • it will determine the detailed program of measurement, collecting and processing of the monitored data in co-operation with the PIOS.

The program should contain in particular:

5.2.3.1) Technical monitoring plan

Technical monitoring of coal fired boiler rooms subject to conversion to gas fuel at the implementation phase and following realisation.

Monitoring’s objective is an ecological economic and energy-wise evaluation of the effectiveness of conversion of about 30 non-industrial coal fired boiler rooms of up to l5 MW output to gas fired high efficiency boilers or combined heat and power generation facilities.

Monitoring requires measurement and reporting of technical parameters and emissions of individual coal fired boiler rooms subject to conversion.

Technical monitoring includes evaluation of the technical state of boilers and their instrumentation, auxiliaries, quantities of fuel and electrical energy used, fuel and water balance, quantity of thermal and electric energy produced and efficiency of heat transmission and use by recipients.

5.2.3.2) Emissions monitoring plan

Ecological monitoring of the selected pollution emissions sources to determine effects of conversion from solid to gas fuel.

The assumptions pertain to about 30 small and medium non-industrial boiler rooms (hereinafter to be referred to as the facilities) with a thermal output of under 5MW per boiler unit presently using solid fuel, predominantly coal.

The scope of these assumptions includes parametric identification of the above mentioned facilities in the aspect of ecological change resulting from conversion from solid to gas fuel.

The ecological monitoring goal is evaluation of reduction of pollution emitted into the atmosphere by the above mentioned facilities, which will be an effect of fuel conversion as well as equipment modernisation, on the basis of technical and emission measurements prior to and following conversion.

Realisation of the goal as defined should take place in stages, also for reasons of effective control supported by modern data collecting techniques.

  • 5.2.3.3) Performance report format
In regard of contents of the report on realisation of conversion of coal fired boiler rooms to gas fired ones.

The report should outline in a concise form progress of realisation of coal fired boiler rooms’ conversion to the gas fired ones inclusive of the realisation stages and guidelines offered in 5.2.3.1) and 5.2.3.2) to "MONITORING PLAN FOR COAL-TO-GAS CONVERSION PROJECT".

The report's content should include a brief description of individual events accompanying project realisation illustrated with tables and diagrams.

It should end up with conclusions useful for improvement of realisation of the other projects of the same type and for the final evaluation of ecological, economic and technical effectiveness achieved as a result of boiler room reconstruction in connection with conversion from coal to gas fuel.

  • 5.2.4) LOGISTICS

After the contract is effective, BOS and the Contractor will develop a mutually acceptable schedule for the pre-conversion monitoring of old coal-fired boiler facilities selected for conversion to gas-firing under the project, including a monitoring schedule of the heat distribution and transfer systems and the end-user building facilities supplied by the old boilers.

Similarly, BOS and the Contractor will develop a schedule for the post-conversion monitoring of new facilities and their associated heat distribution, transfer and end-use systems.

Such schedules (Preconversion Monitoring Schedule and Post-Conversion Monitoring Schedule) will include organisational solutions guaranteeing the starting date for the pre-conversion and post-conversion monitoring activities at each individual project site and the access of the contractor to the individual project site to carry out such activities.

BOS will notify the Contractor at least 3 weeks prior to the proposed monitoring start date of each individual project site.

  • 5.2.5) REPORTING

Within 6 weeks after the contract is effective, the Contractor shall develop a standard form, acceptable to PIOS, for reporting pre-conversion and post-conversion monitoring activity and results for individual conversion project, including a standard environmental report form.

The Contractor together with the Boiler Owner and the Boiler Owners' Representative shall prepare and submit to BOS a monitoring report in accordance with the above mentioned standard form, for each individual project realised.

BOS will ensure timely distribution of the individual reports to the concerned authorities.

  • 5.2.6) VERIFICATION

Verification of the individual monitoring reports will be done by PIOS with use of its field branches and the team of experts participating in the Monitoring Program. PIOS will establish a system of verification procedures which should be applied once a year to all the projects and for some, at random.

PIOS will prepare for the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry a report on verification of each individual project and the GEF Program in as entirety.

The Secretariat-JI will send the above mentioned reports to the World Bank, the Norwegian Government and the UNFCCC - Secretariat.

B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement

B.1) Letters of endorsement will be sent accordingly.

B. 2) This report is a jointjoint report:

  • X Yes, this project has been endorsed by the following parties: the Polish Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry and the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, signed on 30 September 1993.The same

B. 3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:

The items of the report describing the project, its implementation and its effects, have been completed by the Government of Poland. The investor specific items have been completed by the Government of Norway. The World Bank, as the project administrator, has provided assistance and advice in the preparation of the joint report. The same

C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio-economic and environmental priorities and strategies

Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies.

Poland seeks energy security through stable energy deliveries at socially acceptable prices and with a minimal damage to the environment. Among the priority actions are to diversify the primary energy supplies and to comply with international environmental agreements to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. This project is designed to be fully-integrated and consistent with the goals and development strategies of the government of Poland.

AIR PROTECTION

This is based on:

  • the "Implementation Program of the National Environmental Policy till the year to 2000",
  • voivodeship lists of priority projects regarding environmental protection for 1997,
  • and proposals submitted by the Minister of EPNR&F.

The aim of the undertakings concerning the air pollution control is to achieve reductions of pollutant emissions into the atmospheric air by both improving the fuel quality parameters and replacing fuel, by installing equipment that reduces the flue gas emissions of pollutants, by modernising and replacing technologies and by conserving energy.

1) Directions:

  1. Support for the undertakings leading to reductions of the emissions into the atmospheric air of gas and particulate pollutants, by means of the modernisation and upgrading of the fuel production and burning technologies.
  2. Support for the undertakings related to the rationalisation of heat systems, including the recovery of heat, national production of highly efficient heating equipment, combined with the use of unconventional energy sources.

2) Selection criteria for projects in the field of air protection

  1. elimination of low-stack emissions;
  2. supporting projects connected with the construction of systems supplying gas and district heating to spas, tourist destinations and protected areas;
  3. improving heating efficiency, especially linked to the elimination of household stoves and existing local boilers with low efficiency and poor technical condition through a comprehensive modification of heating systems;
  4. control of gaseous and ash emissions from power generation and large hard and (lignite) brown coal-fired energy cogeneration plants, especially having an impact on Poland's international commitments;
  5. improving energy efficiency;
  6. modification of industrial processes in order to improve energy efficiency and reduce harmful emissions;
  7. promoting non - conventional energy source projects;

supporting modern technical solutions limiting the environmental impact of and transport, in particular city transport, in the context of exhaust fumes, noise and vibration emissions including support in equipping monitoring services;

controlling non-ionising electromagnetic radiation. the same

D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project

Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)

Item Please fill in

Describe environmental benefits in detail:

The sameAnticipated global benefits of the total project include a 65 % reduction in CO2 emissions by converting small coal fired boilers to gas firing, and a 28 % CO2 reduction by increasing efficiency in new residential buildings. Local benefits include virtual elimination of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and particulates and significant reduction in nitrogen oxides (NOx) emitted by the converted boilers.

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?

Yes

Planned environmental benefits:

292 135 tCO2/year (concerning 26 projects under Coal to Gas Conversion Component and 4 projects from the list of "stand-by" projects);

766 tCO2/year (concerning 9 projects under Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings Component)141 698 tCO2/year (concerning 12 projects); 3 259 tCO2/year (concerning the AIJ component of the project or 2.3% of total planned environmental benefits).

E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real, measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not have occurred in the absence of such activities

The project cost-effectiveness expressed in the size of the grant per ton of CO2 equivalents is for the typical high efficiency gas-fired boiler between 11 and 43 USD, while the cost of avoided emissions from a condensing boiler would be about 60 USD. For the housing projects, the costs would seem to vary between 90 and 120 USD per ton of CO2 equivalents. As new practices and energy saving equipment become more common in Poland, prices are expected to drop considerably and thus help fulfil the objective of the project more cost-effectively.

Uncontrolled emissions from black coal mines in Poland are assumed to average 20-25 m3 per ton of coal produced. The advantage of reduced emissions of methane from coal mining is not included in the calculations of emission benefits. Also the lifetime of the new gas-fired boilers has in the calculation of emission benefits conservatively been estimated to last for 17 years.the same

E. 1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):

Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:

The sameIn the absence of the total project, reengineering and replacement of existing coal fired boilers only at the end of their service life would be the most common choice of boiler owners due to a low investment price and the familiarity with coal technology. A shift to new coal fired boilers was chosen as the baseline knowing that this is a conservative choice for calculating the probable emission saving. The abatement effect is thus the difference in emissions between new coal-fired boilers and new gas-fired boilers.

E. 2) Estimated emissions with the activity:

Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:

The sameFor both the reference case and the "with project" cases, CO2 emissions were estimated based on: (a) annual heat demand (which is the same for the with project and reference cases); (b) efficiency of heat supply facilities (coal-fired boilers, gas-fired condensing boilers or cogeneration units); (c) unit emission factors for gas, LFO and coal; (d) share of heat produced by the cogeneration unit and the peak boilers. Additional CO2 emission credits were attributed to the cogeneration units, resulting from the displacement of the electricity now generated from coal in the national power system at 34 percent efficiency.

Fill in the following tables as applicable:

E.2.1) Summary table: Projected emissions reductions for Coal to Gas Conversion Component (26 projects + 4 projects from the list of "stand-by" projects):

According to the baseline

GHG 1997 1998 1999 2000

A) Project baseline scenario

(new coal fired boilers)

CO2 [Mg]

1409

1409

45358

157039

NOX [Mg]

1,8

1,8

57,5

190,5

SO2 [Mg]

6,6

6,6

248,4

1208,7

Dust [Mg]

4,1

4,1

203,8

775

B) Project activity scenarioa

(new gas fired boilers)

CO2 [Mg]

719

719

22663

66013

NOX [Mg]

0,3

0,3

10,7

101,3

SO2 [Mg]

0,5

0,5

1,7

10,3

Dust [Mg]

0

0

0

49,8

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2 [Mg]

690

690

22695

91026

NOX [Mg]

1,5

1,5

46,8

89,2

SO2 [Mg]

6,1

6,1

246,7

1198,4

Dust [Mg]

4,1

4,1

203,8

725,2

D) Cumulative effect

CO2 [Mg]

690

1380

24075

115101

NOX [Mg]

1,5

3

50

139

SO2 [Mg]

6,1

12,2

259

1457,3

Dust [Mg]

4,1

8,2

212

937,2

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

GHG 2001 2002 2003 ... 2012

A) Project baseline scenario

(new coal fired boilers)

CO2 [Mg]

250479

346330

346330

346330

NOX [Mg]

301,7

415,3

415,3

415,3

SO2 [Mg]

2060,7

2882,2

2882,2

2882,2

Dust [Mg]

1351,6

1963,9

1963,9

1963,9

B) Project activity scenarioa

(new gas fired boilers)

CO2 [Mg]

102823

139995

139995

139995

NOX [Mg]

170,2

263,3

263,3

263,3

SO2 [Mg]

12,9

14,9

14,9

14,9

Dust [Mg]

49,8

49,8

49,8

49,8

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2 [Mg]

147656

206335

206335

206335

NOX [Mg]

131,5

152

152

152

SO2 [Mg]

2047,8

2867,3

2867,3

2867,3

Dust [Mg]

1301,8

1914,1

1914,1

1914,1

D) Cumulative effect

CO2 [Mg]

262757

469092

675427

2532442

NOX [Mg]

270,5

422,5

574,5

1942,5

SO2 [Mg]

3505,1

6372,4

9239,7

35045,4

Dust [Mg]

2239

4153,1

6067,2

23294,1

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

E.2.2) Summary table: Actual emissions reductions:

GHG

Year 1

Year 1

Year 2

...

Year X

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

CH4

N2O

other

B) Project activity dataa)

CO2

CH4

N2O

other

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

CH4

N2O

Other

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

CH4

N2O

Other

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

F. Bearing in mind that the financing of activities implemented jointly shall be additional to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows, please indicate

The same

Source of project funding

including pre-feasibility stage

(For each source one line)

Amount

(converted to US dollars)

Government of Norway1

1.1 mill USD

GEF

25 mill USD

Poland (NFEP&WM, VFEP&WM, BOS, owner’s contribution)

22 mill USD

1The contribution of the Government of Norway is provided from a separate budget line, the Norwegian Climate Fund, which has been established separate from, and in addition to, the development assistance accounts and will not be reported as part of Norway's ODA. This contribution is provided in addition to meet Norway's financial commitments under UNFCCC.

The Norwegian co-financing was provided in addition to the Norwegian contribution to the GEF in 1993. The availability of extra Norwegian co-financing served to expand the project scope beyond what would have been undertaken in the absence of this funding. Specifically, the extra Norwegian resources resulted in an increase in the targeted number of boiler installations to be converted by the project. In effect, the Norwegian co-financing is covering the non-GEF financed portion of the (expanded) total incremental cost financing requirement and is additional to the financial obligations under the Convention and to regular development financing. The Norwegian government is not seeking emission credits from its investment in the project.

G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties.

The sameDescribe briefly the transfer of environmenally sound technology and know-how including where appropriate the type of technology, terms, education, capacity building, etc.

The introduction of improved technologies would facilitate the Government's efforts to pursue its environmental priorities and standards aggressively and to take full advantage of the macroeconomic conditions and other incentives that induce energy efficiency and conservation.

With largely decontrolled coal prices, a proper gas pricing policy, rising labour costs, and proper set-up and enforcement of environmental fees and fines that reflect the true costs of environmental damage, coal-to-gas conversion would become a financially attractive and self supporting option. The activity could be made more self-sustaining if support were provided to develop an independent power market based on small gas-fired cogeneration systems, high-efficiency boilers and advanced energy-efficient building equipment - insulation, glazing, lighting and appliances - that are widely available.

The scope for using innovative technologies such as high-efficiency gas-fired boilers and packaged gas-fired cogeneration units and for integrating improvements in heat energy supply, distribution, and transfer systems and in end-use efficiency in buildings to improve the cost- effectiveness of the abatement of CO2 emissions needs to be demonstrated through pilot investments. Although the technologies are well-established, their development in Poland and in other Central and Eastern European countries has so far been limited.

The present activity is designed as a catalyst to stimulate self-replicable technological and institutional changes that would promote coal-to-gas conversion in small and medium-size boilers and induce more energy-efficient practices in the architectural design and operation of new residential buildings. The techniques, once successfully demonstrated in Poland, are replicable in the large number of coal-dependent/intensive transition economies that have access to gas supplies.

Institutional Strengthening. The proposed project would contribute to a strengthening of Poland's capacity, at the national and local levels and in the areas selected for project-supported conversion activities, to: (a) plan and implement, on a national basis, the innovative and cost-effective types of environmental improvement activities being supported under the proposed project; (b) develop experience with the design, installation and operation of interventions to improve the heat supply system; (c) create an institutional capability to assess global externalities such as CO2 emission abatement in project analyses; and (d) improve the implementation of public awareness programs for energy efficiency and conservation.

H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties, effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered

Fill in as appropriate:

H. 1) Any practical experience gained:

1) MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM EXECUTION

a) Information concerning STAP performance:

  • BOS SA used the temporary consultations of STAP during the stated period;
  • The meeting of STAP members was held on 29th November 1999. The following projects: Debno Lubuskie, Kudowa Zdroj, Zielona Gora and Jarocin have been recommended for AIJ/GEF grant financing as stand-by projects.
  • a working meeting of all STAP members took place between 26 - 29 August 1996. STAP members reviewed 25 applications for funding aimed at boiler houses modernisation. 15 applications were approved for Implementation (including 12 high efficiency boilers and 3 cogenerations). The report was made and submitted to BOS and MoE,
  • the report of energy auditor relating to energy efficiency improvement in new residential buildings was approved by 3 STAP members (1 foreign among them), within the framework of the energy efficiency for new residential buildings component.

b) Description of consulting services and contractors:

  • contract with energy auditor (NAPE) has been supervised;
  • contract with COWI Consulting Engineers and Planners (Denmark), acting as boiler owners' representative, has been supervised;
  • contract with the new consultants (boiler owners’ representative) - Energoprojekt Katowice (acting as a new boiler owners' representative) has been supervised;
  • the financial audit covering the fiscal year 1998 by the company Pricewaterhouse Coopers has been performed with positive result;
  • consultations of the experts accepted by WB, were carried out during evaluation of the tender documents for the modernization boiler houses.
  • a contract with consultant for preparation of TOR for energy auditor has been concluded,
  • TAG members have been asked to give their opinion on funds allocation (27 applications) aimed at boiler houses modernisation,
  • energy auditor has been chosen - the National Energy Conservation Agency (NECA) and contract with this firm has been signed within the framework of the energy efficiency for new residential buildings component,
  • a bidding documents have been prepared and 5 firms have been chosen (agreed with the World Bank) and these firms have been asked to submit their offer for boiler owner representative.

c) Description of the marketing plan implementation:

  • organisational entities of BOS SA were dealing with marketing under the current activity of central and regional bank's entities using previously prepared materials - rules and procedures for getting AIJ/GEF grant applications and leaflets informing on AIJ/GEF project;
  • the leaflet on efficient use of energy in new residential buildings was distributed among habitants (containing advises how to use house’s equipment). This material contains guidelines how to use the house devices to reduce the consumption of heat, electricity and water;
  • under a cooperation with journalists from Dziennik Baltycki (popular newspaper at the north of Poland) the articles on the Subcomponent „Energy Efficiency in new residential buildings" were published:
  • in „Przegl¹d Targowy” on June 22, 1999;
  • in the supplement „Rynek budowlany" to the Dziennik Baltycki (number from September 1999);
  • marketing activities including mass-media (interviews on AIJ/GEF Project and certain individual projects) were undertaken during ceremonies of signing the „turn-key" contracts.
  • organisational entities of BOS were dealing with marketing under the current activity of central and regional bank's entities using previously prepared leaflets informing about this project, and contacts with environmental protection departments of Voivodeship Authorities and the National Fund of Environmental Protection.

d) The environmental monitoring program accomplishment:

  • Energopomiar Gliwice elaborated results of monitoring carried out for the following projects: Krakow (Jana street), Falenty, Elblag, Rawa Mazowiecka (Zamkowa Wola), Gdynia and Poznan (Potworowskiego street).
  • MoE has prepared the environmental monitoring program (approved by the World Bank),
  • all activities concerned with bidding procedure to select a company responsible for technical and environmental monitoring of the boilers have been commenced by the GEF Project Office.

e) Training program implementation:

  • The staff of GEF Project Office has been provided the BOS SA branches' employees, local experts, TAG members and investors with an updated information.
  • training of specialists under the GEF project did not take place,
  • the employees of GEF project office BOS have been providing the bank branch workers, local experts and TAG members with up-to-date information.

f) Characteristics of the management system:

  • AIJ/GEF Project is implemented under the existed BOS SA structure, which consists of the GEF Project Office in the headquarters and the experimented local branches of the Bank. GEF Project Office co-operates with MoE - Economic Department, the projects are co-financed by National Fund and Voivodeship Funds. Implementation of the projects is realised in direct co-operation with two consulting companies acting as boiler owners’ representatives: COWI from Denmark and Energoprojekt Katowice. GEF Office co-operate with the representants of the World Bank.
  • Minister has assigned his plenipotentiary and an Economic Department to supervise the implementation of the GEF Project instead of Ecological Policy Department. GEF Project is implemented under the existing BOS structure which consists of the GEF project office in the headquarters and the local branches of the Bank.

2) EXPENDITURES AND FUNDS OF THE PROGRAM

  1. Use of resources for the total project (USD)
Category At the end of the reporting period

1.06.99 -– 30.11.996

Cumulative

A. Coal-to-gas conversion:

  • Cogeneration systems
  • High efficiency boilers
  • energy efficiency e.g. for new buildings

909 775

87 641

4 161 640

173 510

B. Contractual services

  • monitoring
  • marketing

22 260

0

91 590

5 024

C. Technical assistance

  • BOS management fee
  • STAP fee
  • Energy auditing services
  • Financial auditing services
  • Training and consulting services

38 216

150

0

7 200

162 400

267 444

55 092

25 177

35 500

620 339

  1. Short description of expenditures (goods, materials and civil works, contractual services, technical assistance, concluded contracts, opened letters of credit - committed sources):
  • Under the „Coal-to-Gas Conversion" component, in reporting period, the five investments were completed, i.e. Piotrkow Trybunalski (grant amount 718,000 USD), Sopot (80,000 USD). There is a few investments being at the last stage of realisation, i.e. Siemianowice Slaskie (1,304,000 USD), Pruszcz Gdanski (216,000 USD) and Ciechanow (555,000 USD). The investment in Ostrow Wielkopolski has just started - first project of cogeneration. A grant agreement has been signed with Krakow, Prabuty, Wabrzezno and Tarnow (total grant amount 3,074,000 USD), it were projects from the reserve list. STAP has approved for realisation the following projects: Debno Lubuskie, Kudowa Zdroj, Zielona Gora, Jarocin. Funds being in reserve and funds saved after a bid process and savings as a result of changes in the exchange rates are going to be spent on the investments mentioned above. The projects of cogeneration are priority;
  • Planned expenditures on the modernisation of high efficiency boilers in relation to modernised seemed to be satisfactory (90%). All funds planned to be spent on the high efficiency system will be disbursed. The low level of disbursement in generally resulting from a very low expenditures spent on cogeneration systems. Amount of disbursement are going to be changed in the future, because four cogeneration projects are at the different stage of implementation (the next projects are prepared). Two projects are most advanced: after contract signing in Ostrow Wielkopolski and after bid evaluation in Swiebodzice disbursed circa 40 % of planned expenditures on Cogeneration Systems;
  • In the frame of the component „Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings" the investment in Czestochowa has been completed in the reporting period and the money has been disbursed (87,6 USD);
  • Under the category of consulting services, money was spent only for the representative of the boiler owners` representative (COWI and Energoprojekt-Katowice);
  • Moreover, on the monitoring (14% of the contract amount) and on the financial audit-PricewaterhouseCoopers, money was disbursed;
  • BOS SA was paid a fee of 6% of the total amount in the reporting period.

A contract between MPEC and BOS concerning modernisation of the boiler house in Cracow, at Œw. Jana street has been signed under the pilot project. A turn key bidding invitation has been published.

H. 2) Technical difficulties:

Organisational and investment problems arose:

Financial schedule of the implementation of projects with high efficiency gas boilers was performed.

Problems occurred, mainly referred to the new technological solutions, i.e. small scale cogeneration projects (Krakow, Wloclawek, Piekary Sl.).

Actually CHP projects are being implemented in: Ostrow Wlkp. (under realisation), Swiebodzice (after bid evaluation), in Gdansk (conceptual design and bidding documents were prepared), in Tarnow (AIJ/GEF grant agreement was signed).

Succeeding projects are being in reserve. These projects will be implemented at the beneficiary’s risk connected with the change of exchange rate. GEF Project Office updated financial and disbursement in connection with the use of contingency funds schedule for the implementation of these projects.

Realisation of this plan with the monitoring program can be completed till March 31, 2002.

In connection with mentioned above and previous coordination (of Economic Department, MoE, with representatives of the World Bank), Minister of Environment asked for the extension of Closing Date to September 30, 2002 (6 months after completion date of the project).

an execution of the pilot project at the Polytechnic University in Cracow is under threat. It is impossible to publish an invitation for a bid aimed at an investment realisation due to the insufficient financial resources supplementary to the grants (the National Fund was unable to determine whether it could allocate its financial resources to the project).

  • preliminary valuation shows that providing small boiler houses (below 1.0 MW) with the grants is uneconomical from the National Fund's effectiveness point of view (costs of servicing per each individual project - e.g. hiring the boiler owner representative are higher than the granted amount). Additionally, the complex and time-consuming procedure is troublesome to an investor who has to operate with domestic inflation still running high, and grant's value is small. Due to this fact, 2 applications approved by STAP would probably not be effected.
  • the complex and time- consuming procedure resulted in the resignation of prevailing part of the boiler owners from GEF grant approved by STAP.
  • modernisation of any boiler house is impossible in 1997 without an efficient reconciliation system of the needed documents between the World Bank and the Polish partner and without taking into account the specific of the Polish economy. The prompt selection of the firm which would carry out the environment monitoring is also essential in order to conduct a modernisation of any boiler house in 1997.

H. 3) Negative impacts and/or effects encountered:

The same

Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)

Item Please fill in

Describe environmental negative impacts/effects in detail:

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental negative impacts/effects?

no

Describe social/cultural negative impacts/effects in detail:

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social negative impacts/effects?

no

Describe economic negative impacts/effects in detail:

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic negative impacts/effects?

no

H. 4) Other obstacles encountered: n/a

H. 5) Other: n/a

Appendix I

Coal to Gas Conversion Component

Descriptions of 2612 IpProjects recommended by STAP and BOS S.A. and approved by Minister of Environment for funding from AIJ/GEF grant. Projects are in different phases of implementation i.e. from the signing of grant agreements to the investment realisation. Updated 30th of November 1999

Project nr. 1

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

CHP at Polytechnic University of Cracow

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Cracow

Activity starting date:

1997 (after balancing of funds)

Expected activity ending date:

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Cogeneration unit:

gas engines 2x1.2 MWe,

gas boilers 9.35 MWt with heat accumulator

1. Financing plan

GEF - 60%

NF and VF - no confirmation

2. Project costs

5891 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

before turn-key bidding invitation

5. Project cost-effectiveness

43.6 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

18 638 tCO2/year

* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.

a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.

b) Circle the appropriate option.

c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.

d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data requirements are.

Project nr. 12

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB at Sw. Jana street in KCrakcow (pilot project)

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

KCrakcow

Activity starting date:

Realisation – 199797

Expected activity ending date:

1997

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

1 condensing boiler 0.585 MWt

2 high efficiency boilers 2x0.4655 MWt;

total 1.5065 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF -– 4837%

Owner’s contribution (Oc) -– 5263%

2. Project costs

288 895394 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

139 394 USD – grant amount;

100% of the grant amount.

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

28.49.3 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

3 4972551 tCO2/year

* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.

a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.

b) Circle the appropriate option.

c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.

d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data requirements are.

Project nr. 2

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB PEC in Leczyca

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Leczyca

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas water boilers: 3x1.75 MWt = 5.25 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 43%, Oc – 11%, VF – 46%

2. Project costs

574 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

40 000 USD – consulting services of the Boiler Owner Representative - BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

13.8 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

4 431 tCO2/yeare)

Project nr. 3

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB PEC in Rawa Mazowiecka "Zamkowa Wola"

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Rawa Mazowiecka

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas water boilers

3x1.75 MWt = 5.25 MWt

Gas condensing boilers

2x0.9 MWt = 1.8 MWt

Total capacity 7.05 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 54%, Oc - 21%, NF – 25%

2. Project costs

1 190 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

40,000 USD - consulting services of BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

26.5 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

7 585 tCO2/year

Project nr. 4

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in hospital in Elblag

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Elblag

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas steam boilers: 2x2.6 MWt = 5.2 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 57%, Oc – 7%, VF – 36%

2. Project costs

1 034 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

40,000 USD - consulting services of BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

29.5 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

4 319 tCO2/year

Project nr. 5

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB OPEC in Gdynia

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Gdynia

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers: 2x0.55 MWt = 1.1 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 43%, Oc – 57%

2. Project costs

166 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

16 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

17.0 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

1 372 tCO2/year

Project nr. 6

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB PEC in Poznan

Potworowskiego street

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Poznan

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas water boilers: 2x1.4 MWt = 2.8 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 45%, Oc – 55%

2. Project costs

421 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

24 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

25.9 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

1 881 tCO2/year

Project nr. 7

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in Falenty IMUZ

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Raszyn Falenty

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas water boilers 2.8 MWt (2x1.4 MWt)

1. Financing plan

GEF - 41%, Oc - 21%, NF – 23%, VF – 15%

2. Project costs

542 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

24 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

31.6 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

2 368 tCO2/year

Project nr. 8

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in hospital in Piotrkow Trybunalski

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Piotrkow Trybunalski

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 4.8 MWt:

2x1.4 MWt = 2.8 MWt (water)

2x1.0 MWt = 2.0 MWt (steam)

1. Financing plan

GEF – 57%, Oc - 6%, VF –37%

2. Project costs

1 357 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

30 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (50% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

55.3 US/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

3 635 tCO2/year

Project nr. 9

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Boilers in two hospitals in Siemianowice Slaskie

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Siemianowice Slaskie

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas steam boilers 7.84 MWt (4x1.96 MWt)

1. Financing plan

GEF – 50%, Oc - 36%, VF – 9%, NF – 5%

2. Project costs

2 706 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

30 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (50% of cost)

84% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

64.2 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

11 549 tCO2/year

Project nr. 10

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in housing cooperative in Sopot

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Sopot

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas water boilers: 2x1.8 MWt = 3.5 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 38%, Oc – 62%

2. Project costs

339 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

40 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

16.2 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

1 794 tCO2/year

Project nr. 11

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in hospital in Ciechanow

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Ciechanow

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 7.6 MWt:

2x1.86 MWt = 3.72 MWt (water)

2x1.96 MWt = 3.92 MWt (steam)

1. Financing plan

GEF - 46%, Oc – 39%, NF – 15%

2. Project costs

1 312 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

25 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (50% of cost)

74% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

29.0 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

6 109 tCO2/year

Project nr. 12

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in Pruszcz Gdanski

Obroncow Pokoju Street

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Pruszcz Gdanski

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers: 2x1.4 MWt = 2.8 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 47%, Oc – 53%

2. Project costs

526 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

6 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (20% of cost)

85% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

20.2 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

3 537 tCO2/year

Project nr. 13

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

CHP MPEC in Ostrow Wlkopolski

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Ostrow Wlkopolski

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2000 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Cogeneration unit:

Gas turbine 5.0 MWe, 8.8 MWt

Additional afterburners 2.8 MWt

Total: 11.6 MWt, 5.0 MWe

1. Financing plan

GEF - 58%, Oc – 42%

2. Project costs

5 789 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

Consulting services of the BOR covered by the boiler owner (BO)

4. Project Implementation performance

„Turn key" contract signed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

10.6 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

54 326 tCO2/year

Project nr. 14

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in hospital in Koszalin

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Koszalin

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2000 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 7.7 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 43%, Oc – 17%, NF – 40%

2. Project costs

1 211 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

Consulting services of the BOR covered by the boiler owner (BO)

4. Project Implementation performance

Bids are being evaluated

5. Project cost-effectiveness

15.7 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

7 673 tCO2/year

Project nr. 15

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB PEC in Poznan Hetmanska Street

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Poznan

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2000 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 3.72 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 47%, Oc – 53%

2. Project costs

715 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

15 000 USD -consulting services of BOR (30% of cost)

4. Project Implementation performance

Before „turn key" contract signing

5. Project cost-effectiveness

19.2 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

4 258 tCO2/year

Project nr. 16

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB PEC in Rawa Mazowiecka "Solidarnosc"

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Rawa Mazowiecka

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2000 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 5.25 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 45%, Oc – 24%, NF – 31%

2. Project costs

1 080 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

15 000 USD -consulting services of BOR (30% of cost)

4. Project Implementation performance

Before „turn key" contract signing

5. Project cost-effectiveness

16.9 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

5 547 tCO2/year

Project nr. 17

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB PEC in Wrzesnia

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Wrzesnia

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2000 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 1.44 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 48%, Oc – 52

2. Project costs

361 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

9 000 USD -consulting services of BOR (30% of cost)

4. Project Implementation performance

Before „turn key" contract signing

5. Project cost-effectiveness

24.9 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

2 192 tCO2/year

Project nr. 18

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

CHP in Gdansk - Matarnia

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Gdansk

Activity starting date:

1999

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Cogeneration unit:

Gas turbine 2.0 MWe, 2.4 MWt

Gas boilers 8.2 MWt

Total: 10.6 MWt, 2.0 MWe

1. Financing plan

GEF – 58%, Oc – 42%

2. Project costs

3 872 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

60 000 USD -consulting services of BOR (30% of cost)

4. Project Implementation performance

Before bid announcement

5. Project cost-effectiveness

20.3 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

25 421 tCO2/year

Project nr. 19

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

CHP in Swiebodzice

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Swiebodzice

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Cogeneration unit:

2 gas engines: 5.8 MWe, 6.8 MWt

2 gas boilers: 8.2 MW

Total: 15.0 MWt, 5.8 MWe

1. Financing plan

GEF – 60%, Oc – 40%

2. Project costs

6 658 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

60 000 USD -consulting services of BOR (30% of cost)

4. Project Implementation performance

Before „turn key" contract signing

5. Project cost-effectiveness

19.3 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

38 995 tCO2/year

Project nr. 203

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

CHP in hospital in Piekary Slaskie

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Piekary Slaskie

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2000 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 2.7 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 40%, Oc - 10%, VF - 15%, NF – 35%

2. Project costs

972 0003668 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

15 000 USD -consulting services of BOR (10% of cost)

4. Project Implementation performance

Before bid announcement

5. Project cost-effectiveness

39.09 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

2 897 tCO2/year

Project nr. 21

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in Pruszcz Gdanski

Obroncow Wybrzeza Street

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Pruszcz Gdanski

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 1.7 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 38%, Oc – 62%

2. Project costs

231 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Conceptual design prepared by BOR

5. Project cost-effectiveness

23.1 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

1 085 tCO2/year

Project nr. 22

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in Janow Lubelski

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Janow Lubelski

Activity starting date:

1999

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 5.25 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 24%, other – 76%

2. Project costs

1 120 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Conceptual design prepared by BOR

5. Project cost-effectiveness

13.2 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

4 835 tCO2/year

Project nr. 23

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in Krakow

Pradnicka Street

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Krakow

Activity starting date:

1999

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 9.0 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 41%, Oc – 59%

2. Project costs

1 088 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Conceptual design prepared by BOR

5. Project cost-effectiveness

13.8 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

6 848 tCO2/year

Project nr. 24

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

CHP in Tarnow

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Tarnow

Activity starting date:

1999

Expected activity ending date:

2002 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Cogeneration unit:

Gas turbine 3.5 MWe, 9.0 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 61%, Oc – 39%

2. Project costs

3 340 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Grant agreement

5. Project cost-effectiveness

7.6 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

41 163 tCO2/year

Project nr. 25

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in Prabuty

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Prabuty

Activity starting date:

1999

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 3.7 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 49%, Oc – 51%

2. Project costs

718 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Grant agreement

5. Project cost-effectiveness

22.4 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

4 941 tCO2/year

Project nr. 26

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in Wabrzezno

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Wabrzezno

Activity starting date:

1999

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 8.0 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 49%, Oc – 51%

2. Project costs

1 097 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Grant agreement

5. Project cost-effectiveness

19.3 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

4 320 tCO2/year

Appendix II

Coal to Gas Conversion Component

Characteristics of 4 projects recommended by STAP for funding from AIJ/GEF grant, accepted by Minister of Environment, planned for the realisation as the stand-by projects Updated 30th of November 1999

Project nr. 13

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in Warsaw University

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Warsaw

Activity starting date:

1999 (estimated)

Expected activity ending date:

2002 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 3.4 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 26%, Oc – 74%

2. Project costs

423 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Approved by:

STAP 16 January 1997

MoE 10 January 1998

5. Project cost-effectiveness

14.5 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

2 861 tCO2/year

Project nr. 2

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

CHP in Nasielsk

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Nasielsk

Activity starting date:

1999 (estimated)

Expected activity ending date:

2002 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Cogeneration unit:

Gas engines 2.8 MWe, 3.2 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 52%, Oc – 48%

2. Project costs

3 131 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Approved by:

STAP 28 January 1999

MoE 12 May 1999

5. Project cost-effectiveness

13.3 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

23 768 tCO2/year

Project nr. 3

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in Leczyca

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Leczyca

Activity starting date:

1999 (estimated)

Expected activity ending date:

2002 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 3.5 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 52%, Oc – 48%

2. Project costs

440 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Approved by:

STAP 28 January 1999

MoE 12 May 1999

5. Project cost-effectiveness

12.2 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

6 373 tCO2/year

Project nr. 4

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

HOB in Poznan

Rynarzewska Street

Type of project:a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Poznan

Activity starting date:

1999 (estimated)

Expected activity ending date:

2002 (estimated)

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

17 years

Technical data:d)

Gas boilers 4.6 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 44%, Oc – 56%

2. Project costs

569 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Approved by:

STAP 28 January 1999

MoE 12 May 1999

5. Project cost-effectiveness

18.6 USD/tCO2*

6. Planned environmental benefits

2 555 tCO2/year

Appendix III

Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings Component

Characteristics of 9 projects for which the energy audits were conducted and the agreements on grant allocation were signed Updated 31st of December 1999

Project nr. 1

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Building "62" - Kontkiewicza 62 street, Housing estate: Wyczerpy, Czestochowa

Co-operative JURA in Czestochowa

Multi family buildingBuilding space: 3055.7 m2Number of flats 49

Type of project:a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Czestochowa

Activity starting date:

1996

Expected activity ending date:

July 30, 1997

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

50 years

Technical data:d)

1. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.17 W/(m2K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 12 cm;

2. Improvement of the basement floor's insulation level to U=0.27 W/(m2K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 9cm;

3. Window's installation - heat-transfer coefficient of U=1.5 W/(m2K);

4. Application of mechanical ventilation;

5. Installation of heat recovery unit – capacity 91%;

6. Foamed polystyrene moulder "Thermomur" – extra charge over the required standard;

7. Installation of gas- oil boiler house above the cost of installation of boiler house with capacity of 90%.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 5.5%, Own means – 94.5%

2. Project costs

1 187 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

Energy Auditor verified all documents connected with the procurement of energy efficiency measures, submitted by the developer and established the final AIJ/GEF grant amount at 65 296.40 USD.

4. Project Implementation performance

The building is completed and commissioned. The final AIJ/GEF grant amount (65 296.40 USD) was calculated by Energy Auditor and reimbursed to the Developer. Monitoring report is being prepared by Energy Auditor.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

130.0 USD/tCO2

6. Planned environmental benefits

61 tCO2/year

Project nr. 2

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Building "C" – Kontkiewicza street, Housing estate: Wyczerpy, Czestochowa

Co-operative JURA in Czestochowa

Multi family buildingBuilding space: 1541.6 m2Number of flats 24

Type of project:a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Czestochowa

Activity starting date:

15 April 1997

Expected activity ending date:

March 1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

50 years

Technical data:d)

1. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.17 W/(m2K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 12 cm;

2. Improvement of the basement floor's insulation level to U=0.27 W/(m2K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 9cm;

3. Window's installation - heat-transfer coefficient of U=1.5 W/(m2K);

4. Application of mechanical ventilation;

5. Installation of heat recovery unit - capacity 91%;

6. Foamed polystyrene moulder "Thermomur" – extra charge over the required standard.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 5.9% USD, Own means – 94.1%

2. Project costs

740 800 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

Energy Auditor verified all documents connected with the procurement of energy efficiency measures, submitted by the developer and established the final AIJ/GEF grant amount at 43 707.20 USD.

4. Project Implementation performance

The building is completed and commissioned. The final AIJ/GEF grant amount (43 707.20 USD) was calculated by Energy Auditor and reimbursed to the Developer. Monitoring report is being prepared by Energy Auditor.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

120.0 USD/tCO2

6. Planned environmental benefits

31 tCO2/year

Project nr. 3

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Building "B" – Kontkiewicza street, Housing estate: Wyczerpy, CzestochowaCo-operative JURA in Czestochowa

Multi family buildingBuilding space: 1541.6 m2

Number of flats 24

Type of project:a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Czestochowa

Activity starting date:

2 April 1997

Expected activity ending date:

March 1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

50 years

Technical data:d)

1. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.17 W/(m2K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 12 cm;2. Improvement of the basement floor's insulation level to U=0.27 W/(m2K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 9cm;

3. Window's installation - heat-transfer coefficient of U=1.5 W/(m2K);

4. Application of mechanical ventilation;

5. Installation of heat recovery unit - capacity 91%,

6. Foamed polystyrene moulder "Thermomur" – extra charge over the required standard;

7. Solar collectors assembled at building no 62.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 5.9%, Own means – 94.1%

2. Project costs

744 600 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

Energy Auditor verified all documents connected with the procurement of energy efficiency measures, submitted by the developer and established the final AIJ/GEF grant amount at 43 933.89 USD.

4. Project Implementation performance

The building is completed and commissioned. The final AIJ/GEF grant amount (43 933.89 USD) was calculated by Energy Auditor and reimbursed to the Developer. Monitoring report is being prepared by Energy Auditor.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

98.0 USD/tCO2

6. Planned environmental benefits

30 tCO2/year

Project nr. 4

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Housing Estate "ZIELONKI" composed of 21 single family buildings, built as 5 range buildings

"ACCORD" Krakow

Single family buildings constructed in "Canadian Technology":

Number of single family buildings 21

Total buildings space 2413.65 m2

Type of project:a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Krakow

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

September 1998

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

50 years

Technical data:d)

1. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.34, 0.39, 0.44 W/(m2K) by extra packing of insulation material;

2. Improvement of the roof insulation level to U=0.15 W/(m2K) - additionally enlargement of an insulation;

3. Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.1W/(m2K);

4. Installation of fixed external window shutters but only in 5 single family buildings.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 2%, Own means – 98%

2. Project costs

1 039 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

All energy efficiency measures are procured.

4. Project Implementation performance

The building is completed. The final AIJ/GEF grant amount (20 572.48 USD) was calculated by Energy Auditor and reimbursed to the Developer. Monitoring report is being prepared by Energy Auditor.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

26.0-30.0 USD/tCO2

6. Planned environmental benefits

33 tCO2/year

Project nr. 5

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Housing Estate in Wilanow (Jara and Bruzdowa streets) composed of 41 single family buildings, built as 6 range buildings

"Housing Cooperative "Inicjatywa Ekologiczna" in Warsaw

Single family buildings:

Number of single family buildings 41

Total buildings space 7341.2 m2

Type of project:a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Warsaw

Activity starting date:

July 1998

Expected activity ending date:

September 1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

50 years

Technical data:d)

1. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.32, 0.37, 0.42 W/(m2K);

2. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.14 W/(m2K);

3. Improvement of floor's insulation level to R=2.60 (m2K)/W;

4. Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.1 W/(m2K);

5. Application of mechanical ventilation with heat recovery unit - capacity 91%;

6. Sun collectors and warm tank;

7. Iron inserted piece capable for the fireplace with water jacket.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 9.3%, Own means – 90.7%

2. Project costs

3 387 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

Because of the change of the technology of external walls, the energy audit covering this change is being made. (Paid from the own sources of developer).

4. Project Implementation performance

Average about 70% of the total raw opened state of the buildings.

The members of Housing Cooperative decided which energy efficiency measures will be used.

The reduction of energy efficiency measures is expected.

Energy Auditor is examining the compliance of the projects with AIJ/GEF criteria. (Paid by Beneficiaries)

5. Project cost-effectiveness

37.0-42.0 USD/tCO2

6. Planned environmental benefits

289 tCO2/year

Project nr. 6

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Housing Estate "KOWALE B" composed of 23 multifamily buildings

Towarzystwo Inwestycyjne "INVESTING" SA

Gdansk

23 multi family buildings:

Number of flats 183,

Total buildings space 11 097.94 m2

Type of project:a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Gdansk

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

30 June 1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

50 years

Technical data:d)

1. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.37, 0.47, 0.42 W/(m2K);

2. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.23 W/(m2K);

3. Improvement of floor's insulation level to R=2.82 (m2K)/W;

4 Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.6 W/(m2K);

5. Application of mechanical ventilation and heat recovery unit;

6. Programme temperature controller.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 6.5%, Own means – 93.5%

2. Project costs

4 493 200 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

All energy efficiency measures have been procured and installed.

4. Project Implementation performance

The buildings are completed. The final AIJ/GEF grant amount (292 059 USD) was calculated by Energy Auditor and was approved by World Bank.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

96.0-114.0 USD/tCO2

6. Planned environmental benefits

248 tCO2/year

Project nr. 7

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Housing Estate in Myslowice close to Katowice, composed of 19 single family buildings

OIKOS Sp. z o.o., Katowice

Single family buildings:

Number of single family buildings 19

Total buildings space 4836 m2

Type of project:a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Myslowice close to Katowice

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

30 September 1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

50 years

Technical data:d)

1. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.31, 0.36, 0.41 W/(m2K) by extra packing of insulation material;

2. Improvement of the roof insulation level to U=0.24 W/(m2K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation;

3. Improvement of floor's insulation level to R=2.60 (m2K)/W;

4. Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.5W/(m2K).

1. Financing plan

GEF – 1.9%, Own means – 98.1%

2. Project costs

1 730 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

All energy efficiency measures are procured.

4. Project Implementation performance

Energy Auditor is verifying all documents submitted by the developer.

The status of construction is following:

13 buildings – completed;

6 buildings - last internal works are conducted.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

77.0-79.0 USD/tCO2

6. Planned environmental benefits

37 tCO2/year

Project nr. 8

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Multi family building

Berenta/Micinskiego street,

Wroclaw

ARCHICOM Sp. z o.o.

Multi family building:

Building space: 6051.17 m2;

Number of flats 65.

Type of project:a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Wroclaw

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

March 1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

50 years

Technical data:d)

1. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.22 W/(m2K);

2. Improvement of the garden floor's insulation level to U=0.22 W/(m2K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 9cm;

3. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.52, 0.57, 0.62 W/(m2K);

4. Window's installation – heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.1 W/(m2K);

5. Heaters with small water capacity.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 1%, Own means – 99%

2. Project costs

3 118 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

All energy efficiency measures are procured.

4. Project Implementation performance

The building is completed. Energy Auditor is verifying all documents submitted by the developer.

The final grant amount is being calculated.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

32.0 USD/tCO2

6. Planned environmental benefits

26 tCO2/year

Project nr. 9

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Single Family buildings built as 3 double-flat buildings by Housing Cooperative "Przylesie" in Koszalin;

6 single-family buildings built as 3 buildings with 2 apartments each;

Total buildings space 1027.8 m2.

Type of project:a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Koszalin

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

September 1999

Stage of activity:b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

50 years

Technical data:d)

1. Improvement of the walls insulation level;

2. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.22 W/(m2K);

3. Improvement of floor's insulation level;

4. Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U= 1.6 W/(m2K).

1. Financing plan

GEF – 1.2%, Own means – 98.8%

2. Project costs

696 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

All energy efficiency buildings were procured.

4. Project Implementation performance

Energy Auditor is verifying all documents submitted by the developer.

The final grant amount is being calculated.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

26.0 USD/tCO2

6. Planned environmental benefits

11 tCO2/year