Name of organisation^a):

Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Name of organisation (English):

Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Department:

Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function with activity:

Governmental authority responsible for committing financial resources for AIJ component and approval of AIJ project agreements and reports (foreign investor – AIJ)

Street:

Juniplassen / Victoria Terrasse

Post Code:

PO Box 8114

City:

N-0032 Oslo DEP 1

Country:

Norway

Telephone:

+47 22 24 36 03

Fax:

+47 22 23 27 82

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact Person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Bjornebye

First name, middle name:

Erik

Job title:

Head of Division

Direct tel:

+47 22 24 36 03

Direct fax:

+47 22 23 27 82

Direct E-mail:

Erik.bjornebye@ud.dep.telemax.no

Name of organisation^a):

World Bank

Name of organisation (English):

World Bank

Department:

Carbon Offset Unit

Acronym:

WB

Acronym (English):

WB

Function within activity:

Administration of project on behalf of World Bank - GEF and the Norwegian Government

Street:

1818 H Street, N.W.

Post code:

DC 20433

City:

Washington, DC 20433

Country:

USA

Telephone:

+1 (202) 473-4279

Fax:

+1 (202) 522-3256

E-mail:

environment@worldbank.org

WWW-URL:

http://www-esd.worldbank/aij

Contact person (for this activity):

---------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Patrick

First name, middle name:

Karani

Job title:

Program Manager

Direct tel:

+1 (202) 473-4279

Direct fax:

+1 (202) 522-2130

Direct E-mail:

Pkarani@worldbank.org

Name of organisation^a):

Ministerstwo Srodowiska

Name of organisation (English):

Ministry of Environment

Department:

Economic Department

Acronym:

MOSZNiL

Acronym (English):

MoE

Function within activity:

Host country representative

Street:

Wawelska 52/54

Post code:

00-922

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 825 00 01

Fax:

(+48 22) 825 29 73

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

http://www.mos.gov.pl

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mrs. Maliszewska

First name, middle name:

Maria

Job title:

Director of Economic Department

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 825 17 22; 825 00 01 w. 402

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 825 29 73

Direct E-mail:

maria.maliszewska@mos.gov.pl

Name of organisation^a):

Narodowy Fundusz Ochrony Srodowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej, Sekretariat - JI

Name of organisation (English):

National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management, JI-Secretariat

Department:

Executive Office for Climate Convention

Acronym:

NFOSiGW

Acronym (English):

NF

Function within activity:

National Focal Point, Reporting agency

Street:

Konstruktorska 3A

Post code:

02-673

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 849 22 80; 849 00 80

Fax:

(+48 22) 849 20 98

E-mail:

Jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl

WWW-URL:

http://www.nfosigw.gov.pl

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mrs. Galon-Kozakiewicz, Ph.D

First name, middle name:

Jolanta

Job title:

JI-Secretariat

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 849 22 80; 849 00 80 ext. 504

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 849 20 98

Direct E-mail:

Jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl

Name of organisation^a):

Bank Ochrony Srodowiska SA

Name of organisation (English):

Environmental Protection Bank

Department:

Acronym:

BOS

Acronym (English):

BOS

Function within activity:

Implementing agency

Street:

Jana Pawla II 12

Post code:

00-950 Warsaw

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 850 88 05

Fax:

(+48 22) 850 88 89

E-mail:

bos_bit2@pol.pl

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Urbala, Ph.D.

First name, middle name:

Stanislaw

Job title:

Director GEF Project

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 850 89 44

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 850 88 89

Direct E-mail:

bos_bit2@pol.pl

Name of organisation :

Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Name of organisation (English):

Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs

Department:

Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs

Acronym:

-

Acronym (English):

-

Function with activity:

Governmental authority responsible for committing financial resources for AIJ projects and approval of AIJ project agreements and reports (foreign investor - AIJ)

Street:

Victoria Street, P.O. Box 8114 Dep

Post Code:

0032

City:

Oslo

Country:

Norway

Telephone:

47-22 24 36 03

Fax:

47-22 24 27 82

E-mail:

-

WWW-URL:

-

Contact Person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Leiro

First name, middle name:

Jostein

Job title:

Head of Division

Direct tel:

47-22 24 36 08

Direct fax:

47-22 24 27 82

Direct E-mail:

jleiro@online.no

Name of organisation:

World Bank

Name of organisation (English):

World Bank

Department:

Environment Department

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function within activity:

Administration of project on behalf of World Bank - GEF and the Norwegian Government

Street:

1818 H Street, NW

Post code:

20433

City:

Washington DC

Country:

USA

Telephone:

(202) 473-9746

Fax:

(202) 522-3256

E-mail:

Etandberg@worldbank.org

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

---------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Tandberg

First name, middle name:

Eivind

Job title:

Advisor

Direct tel:

(202) 473-9746

Direct fax:

(202) 522-3256

Direct E-mail:

Etandberg@worldbank.org

Name of organisation:

Ministerstwo Ochrony Srodowiska, Zasobów Naturalnych i Lesnictwa

Name of organisation (English):

Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry

Department:

Department of Budget and Finance

Acronym:

MOSZNiL

Acronym (English):

MoE

Function within activity:

Host country representative

Street:

Wawelska 52/54

Post code:

00-922

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 25 00 01

Fax:

(+48 22) 25 29 73

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mrs. Chochlew

First name, middle name:

Irena

Job title:

Director, Department of Budget and Finance

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 25 00 01 ext. 402; 25 17 22

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 25 29 73

Direct E-mail:

Name of organisation^:

Narodowy Fundusz Ochrony Srodowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej, Sekretariat - JI

Name of organisation (English):

National Found for Environmental Protection and Water Management, JI-Secretariat

Department:

International Department

Acronym:

NFOSiGW

Acronym (English):

NF

Function within activity:

Reporting agency

Street:

Konstruktorska 3A

Post code:

02-673

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 49 22 80; 49 00 80

Fax:

(+48 22) 49 20 98

E-mail:

jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl

WWW-URL:

http://www.nfosigw.gov.pl/

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mrs. Galon-Kozakiewicz, Ph.D

First name, middle name:

Jolanta

Job title:

Head of JI-Secretariat

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 49 22 80; 49 00 80 ext. 504

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 49 20 98

Direct E-mail:

jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl

Name of organisation^:

Bank Ochrony Srodowiska SA

Name of organisation (English):

Environmental Protection Bank

Department:

Acronym:

BOS

Acronym (English):

BOS

Function within activity:

Implementing agency

Street:

Przasnyska 6A

Post code:

01-756

City:

Warsaw

Country:

Poland

Telephone:

(+48 22) 633 55 22

Fax:

(+48 22) 639 73 12

E-mail:

bos_bit@pol.pl

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

--------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Mr. Urbala, Ph.D.

First name, middle name:

Stanis³aw

Job title:

Director GEF Project

Direct tel:

(+48 22) 633 55 22 ext. 392

Direct fax:

(+48 22) 639 73 12

Direct E-mail:

bos_bit@pol.pl

General description:

Poland's energy economy is dominated by coal, which is domestically produced. The related greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution problems are huge.

The share of coal was 77% in 1991, while the share of oil and gas was 21%, one of the lowest in continental Europe. A shift towards an oil and gas share of 53 to 73% has been estimated by the World Bank to lead to at least 50% reduction in the carbon dioxide emissions.

One of the reasons for the widespread use of coal is the use for space heating. The use of gas for space heating was earlier prohibited and the use of oil was held back by various measures. The aim was to limit foreign exchange expenditures on energy imports. Coal for space heating is used both in district heating systems, block heating plants (heating several apartments) and in individual heating in stoves. District heating companies own about 16 GW coal fired boilers, consuming about 6 million tons of coal per year. About 3,2 GW of this capacity is, by the World Bank, considered suitable for replacement with gas fired boilers.

Removal of the direct regulation of fuel use will result in a shift from coal to gas or oil. Coal will for reasons of price remain the preferred fuel for relatively large boilers, where economies of scale offsets the higher costs of coal handling and emission control equipment. Also in small boilers, coal has until recently been the preferred fuel for economic reasons, but higher coal prices will reduce its use in the long term.

Environmental standards have been and will be further strengthened for sulphur, particulates and nitrogen oxide, and effective enforcement will be phased in over many years. This will accelerate the price-driven conversion of small boilers from coal to gas. The emission standards are administered by local authorities and linked to these is a system of fees and fines. Emissions of sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulates, as well as carbon dioxide are taxed. The fees on carbon dioxide are only of symbolic nature. The other fees could have some albeit small effects on conversions from coal to gas.

There are several obstacles to conversions from coal to gas. They include lack of access to financing, budgetary procedures of publicly owned heating companies, and lack of price incentives. Cost savings in heat production are not felt by consumers because heat prices are subsidised. Only the local authorities have a well defined interest in reducing costs but often lack the financial means for investment.

For the immediate future, the conversion of coal to gas will not be financially attractive without taking into account the global warming considerations and/or local pollution effects.The same

Description of the other Energy Efficiency Projects

Besides projects described in the Appendix III, for which BOS SA signed preliminary agreement on applying for AIJ/GEF grant with developers. These developers are cooperating with Energy Auditor. Energy Audits are expected to be completed soon.

Their projects are following:

• 10 multifamily buildings (75 apartments and area 4168,6 m² totally) in Gdansk - project of "Towarzystwo Inwestycyjne - Investing S.A." (the request covered 37 multifamily buildings of total amount 17553,83 m² and 10 single family buildings - but because of too late date of completion they can not be covered by GEF grant),
• 1 multifamily building (7-8 floors) with area of 5267 m² and 94 apartments in Wroclaw, Ciepla 15 Street - project of „ARCHICOM" firm.
• 2 multifamily buildings constructed by "Towarzystwo Budownictwa Spolecznego Czynszowka" from Gdynia:
• 1 building with the area of 3342,5 m² and 70 apartments, 8 service rooms, 4 floors and attic, Nalkowskiej Street;
• 1 building with the area of 2766,7 m² and 60 apartments, 1 service room, 4 floors and attic, Dembinskiego 21/37 Street.

Type of project:^a)

Fuel conversion and energy efficiency measures.

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Both the Coal to Gas Conversion Component coal-to-gas component and the Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings Component housing component are located throughout Poland.

Activity starting date:

June 30, 1995

Expected activity ending date:

2002

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

26 individual projects, approved by MoE, to be modernized under the Coal-to-Gas Conversion component are at different stages of implementation:

• 12 projects were commissioned,
• 1 project - "turn-key" contract for realisation has been signed
• 2 projects are at the stage of the „turn-key" contract negotiation,
• 2 projects are after the bidding procedure before signing the „turn-key" contract (the bid evaluation reports have been transmitted to the World Bank),
• 1 project is after the biding procedure during the bid evaluation,
• 2 projects are after preparation of the tender document, before publishing an announcement,
• 3 projects have been already prepared with the conceptual design,
• for 3 projects Grant Agreements have been signed,
• 4 projects are in the stand-by group (Jaros³aw resigned),
• 4 next projects (3 cogeneration in this group) have been recommended by STAP for stand-by group.

Under the energy efficiency component of AIJ/GEF, 9 grant agreements were concluded and these projects are at different stages of implementation:

• 7 projects are completed, the report on the monitoring of one of them is being prepared, for 3 of them the final amount of grant has not been calculated yet,
• 2 projects are under construction at different stage of construction works.

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years under Coal to Gas Conversion Component;

50 years under Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings Component.

Technical data:^d)

(details are available in the appendixes)

1. Financing plan

25 mill USD - GEF,

1.1 mill USD - grant from the Government of Norway – AIJ component,

22 mill USD - Poland (National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (NF), Voivodeship Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (VF), BOS, owner’s contribution (Oc))

2. Project costs

48 mill USD (35.5 mill USD - engaged funds for 1997)

3. Project cost-effectiveness

30.1 USD/tCO₂* (average concerning 12 projects)See description of each individual project (Appendix I, II, III)

4. Planned environ-mental benefits

292 901 tCO₂/year:

292 135141 698 tCO₂/year - concerning 26 projects under Coal to Gas Conversion Component and 4 projects from the list of "stand-by" projects;

766 tCO₂/year – concerning 9 projects under Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings Component(total concerning 12 projects); 3 259 tCO₂/year (concerning the AIJ component of the project or 2.3% of total planned environmental benefits)..

Cost of the project in USD:

48 mill

AIJ component in USD:

1.1 mill

USD per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:

High efficiency gas boilers

Between 11 and 43

Condensing boiler

About 60

Housing projects

Between 90 and 120

5.1) General Agreement

The Government of Poland has received grant funds from the Government of Norway and from the GEF.

The World Bank is acting as Trustee of GEF Norwegian funds for the project.

On behalf of the Government of Poland, the Minister of EPNR&F is a grantee of this fund. The MoE, through its Department of Ecological Policy, is responsible for: (a) overall co-ordination and implementation of this project; and (b) monitoring and reviewing project activities and products to assure that they are of a high quality and are accomplished in a cost- effective and timely manner.

Recognising the complexity of Joint Implementation Program, the Minister of EPNR&F has established the Polish Secretariat for Joint Implementation in NF.

BOS is acting as the Implementing Agency for this project and as administrator of project activities and funds to be used solely for the purposes of the project.

The same

Poland seeks energy security through stable energy deliveries at socially acceptable prices and with a minimal damage to the environment. Among the priority actions are to diversify the primary energy supplies and to comply with international environmental agreements to reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. This project is designed to be fully-integrated and consistent with the goals and development strategies of the government of Poland.

AIR PROTECTION

This is based on:

• the "Implementation Program of the National Environmental Policy till the year to 2000",
• voivodeship lists of priority projects regarding environmental protection for 1997,
• and proposals submitted by the Minister of EPNR&F.

The aim of the undertakings concerning the air pollution control is to achieve reductions of pollutant emissions into the atmospheric air by both improving the fuel quality parameters and replacing fuel, by installing equipment that reduces the flue gas emissions of pollutants, by modernising and replacing technologies and by conserving energy.

1) Directions:

1. Support for the undertakings leading to reductions of the emissions into the atmospheric air of gas and particulate pollutants, by means of the modernisation and upgrading of the fuel production and burning technologies.
2. Support for the undertakings related to the rationalisation of heat systems, including the recovery of heat, national production of highly efficient heating equipment, combined with the use of unconventional energy sources.

2) Selection criteria for projects in the field of air protection

1. elimination of low-stack emissions;
2. supporting projects connected with the construction of systems supplying gas and district heating to spas, tourist destinations and protected areas;
3. improving heating efficiency, especially linked to the elimination of household stoves and existing local boilers with low efficiency and poor technical condition through a comprehensive modification of heating systems;
4. control of gaseous and ash emissions from power generation and large hard and (lignite) brown coal-fired energy cogeneration plants, especially having an impact on Poland's international commitments;
5. improving energy efficiency;
6. modification of industrial processes in order to improve energy efficiency and reduce harmful emissions;
7. promoting non - conventional energy source projects;

supporting modern technical solutions limiting the environmental impact of and transport, in particular city transport, in the context of exhaust fumes, noise and vibration emissions including support in equipping monitoring services;

controlling non-ionising electromagnetic radiation. the same

Describe environmental benefits in detail:

The sameAnticipated global benefits of the total project include a 65 % reduction in CO₂ emissions by converting small coal fired boilers to gas firing, and a 28 % CO₂ reduction by increasing efficiency in new residential buildings. Local benefits include virtual elimination of sulphur dioxide (SO₂) and particulates and significant reduction in nitrogen oxides (NO_x) emitted by the converted boilers.

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?

Yes

Planned environmental benefits:

292 135 tCO₂/year (concerning 26 projects under Coal to Gas Conversion Component and 4 projects from the list of "stand-by" projects);

766 tCO₂/year (concerning 9 projects under Energy Efficiency in New Residential Buildings Component)141 698 tCO₂/year (concerning 12 projects); 3 259 tCO₂/year (concerning the AIJ component of the project or 2.3% of total planned environmental benefits).

A) Project baseline scenario

(new coal fired boilers)

CO₂ [Mg]

1409

1409

45358

157039

NO_X [Mg]

1,8

1,8

57,5

190,5

SO₂ [Mg]

6,6

6,6

248,4

1208,7

Dust [Mg]

4,1

4,1

203,8

775

B) Project activity scenario^a

(new gas fired boilers)

CO₂ [Mg]

719

719

22663

66013

NO_X [Mg]

0,3

0,3

10,7

101,3

SO₂ [Mg]

0,5

0,5

1,7

10,3

Dust [Mg]

0

0

0

49,8

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO₂ [Mg]

690

690

22695

91026

NO_X [Mg]

1,5

1,5

46,8

89,2

SO₂ [Mg]

6,1

6,1

246,7

1198,4

Dust [Mg]

4,1

4,1

203,8

725,2

D) Cumulative effect

CO₂ [Mg]

690

1380

24075

115101

NO_X [Mg]

1,5

3

50

139

SO₂ [Mg]

6,1

12,2

259

1457,3

Dust [Mg]

4,1

8,2

212

937,2

A) Project baseline scenario

(new coal fired boilers)

CO₂ [Mg]

250479

346330

346330

346330

NO_X [Mg]

301,7

415,3

415,3

415,3

SO₂ [Mg]

2060,7

2882,2

2882,2

2882,2

Dust [Mg]

1351,6

1963,9

1963,9

1963,9

B) Project activity scenario^a

(new gas fired boilers)

CO₂ [Mg]

102823

139995

139995

139995

NO_X [Mg]

170,2

263,3

263,3

263,3

SO₂ [Mg]

12,9

14,9

14,9

14,9

Dust [Mg]

49,8

49,8

49,8

49,8

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO₂ [Mg]

147656

206335

206335

206335

NO_X [Mg]

131,5

152

152

152

SO₂ [Mg]

2047,8

2867,3

2867,3

2867,3

Dust [Mg]

1301,8

1914,1

1914,1

1914,1

D) Cumulative effect

CO₂ [Mg]

262757

469092

675427

2532442

NO_X [Mg]

270,5

422,5

574,5

1942,5

SO₂ [Mg]

3505,1

6372,4

9239,7

35045,4

Dust [Mg]

2239

4153,1

6067,2

23294,1

GHG

Year 1

Year 1

Year 2

...

Year X

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

CH4

N2O

other

B) Project activity data^a)

CO2

CH4

N2O

other

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

CH4

N2O

Other

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

CH4

N2O

Other

including pre-feasibility stage

(For each source one line)

(converted to US dollars)

Government of Norway¹

GEF

Poland (NFEP&WM, VFEP&WM, BOS, owner’s contribution)

1.06.99 -– 30.11.996

A. Coal-to-gas conversion:

• Cogeneration systems
• High efficiency boilers
• energy efficiency e.g. for new buildings

909 775

87 641

4 161 640

173 510

B. Contractual services

• monitoring
• marketing

22 260

0

91 590

5 024

C. Technical assistance

• BOS management fee
• STAP fee
• Energy auditing services
• Financial auditing services
• Training and consulting services

38 216

150

0

7 200

162 400

267 444

55 092

25 177

35 500

620 339

Describe environmental negative impacts/effects in detail:

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental negative impacts/effects?

no

Describe social/cultural negative impacts/effects in detail:

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social negative impacts/effects?

no

Describe economic negative impacts/effects in detail:

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic negative impacts/effects?

no

General description:

CHP at Polytechnic University of Cracow

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Cracow

Activity starting date:

1997 (after balancing of funds)

Expected activity ending date:

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Cogeneration unit:

gas engines 2x1.2 MWe,

gas boilers 9.35 MWt with heat accumulator

1. Financing plan

GEF - 60%

NF and VF - no confirmation

2. Project costs

5891 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

before turn-key bidding invitation

5. Project cost-effectiveness

43.6 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

18 638 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB at Sw. Jana street in KCrakcow (pilot project)

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

KCrakcow

Activity starting date:

Realisation – 199797

Expected activity ending date:

1997

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

1 condensing boiler 0.585 MWt

2 high efficiency boilers 2x0.4655 MWt;

total 1.5065 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF -– 4837%

Owner’s contribution (Oc) -– 5263%

2. Project costs

288 895394 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

139 394 USD – grant amount;

100% of the grant amount.

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

28.49.3 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

3 4972551 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB PEC in Leczyca

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Leczyca

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas water boilers: 3x1.75 MWt = 5.25 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 43%, Oc – 11%, VF – 46%

2. Project costs

574 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

40 000 USD – consulting services of the Boiler Owner Representative - BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

13.8 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

4 431 tCO₂/year^e)

General description:

HOB PEC in Rawa Mazowiecka "Zamkowa Wola"

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Rawa Mazowiecka

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas water boilers

3x1.75 MWt = 5.25 MWt

Gas condensing boilers

2x0.9 MWt = 1.8 MWt

Total capacity 7.05 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 54%, Oc - 21%, NF – 25%

2. Project costs

1 190 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

40,000 USD - consulting services of BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

26.5 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

7 585 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in hospital in Elblag

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Elblag

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas steam boilers: 2x2.6 MWt = 5.2 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 57%, Oc – 7%, VF – 36%

2. Project costs

1 034 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

40,000 USD - consulting services of BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

29.5 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

4 319 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB OPEC in Gdynia

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Gdynia

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers: 2x0.55 MWt = 1.1 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 43%, Oc – 57%

2. Project costs

166 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

16 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

17.0 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

1 372 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB PEC in Poznan

Potworowskiego street

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Poznan

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas water boilers: 2x1.4 MWt = 2.8 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 45%, Oc – 55%

2. Project costs

421 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

24 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

25.9 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

1 881 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in Falenty IMUZ

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Raszyn Falenty

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas water boilers 2.8 MWt (2x1.4 MWt)

1. Financing plan

GEF - 41%, Oc - 21%, NF – 23%, VF – 15%

2. Project costs

542 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

24 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

31.6 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

2 368 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in hospital in Piotrkow Trybunalski

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Piotrkow Trybunalski

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 4.8 MWt:

2x1.4 MWt = 2.8 MWt (water)

2x1.0 MWt = 2.0 MWt (steam)

1. Financing plan

GEF – 57%, Oc - 6%, VF –37%

2. Project costs

1 357 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

30 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (50% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

55.3 US/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

3 635 tCO₂/year

General description:

Boilers in two hospitals in Siemianowice Slaskie

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Siemianowice Slaskie

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas steam boilers 7.84 MWt (4x1.96 MWt)

1. Financing plan

GEF – 50%, Oc - 36%, VF – 9%, NF – 5%

2. Project costs

2 706 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

30 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (50% of cost)

84% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

64.2 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

11 549 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in housing cooperative in Sopot

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Sopot

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas water boilers: 2x1.8 MWt = 3.5 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 38%, Oc – 62%

2. Project costs

339 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

40 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (80% of cost)

100% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

16.2 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

1 794 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in hospital in Ciechanow

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Ciechanow

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 7.6 MWt:

2x1.86 MWt = 3.72 MWt (water)

2x1.96 MWt = 3.92 MWt (steam)

1. Financing plan

GEF - 46%, Oc – 39%, NF – 15%

2. Project costs

1 312 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

25 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (50% of cost)

74% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

29.0 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

6 109 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in Pruszcz Gdanski

Obroncow Pokoju Street

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Pruszcz Gdanski

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers: 2x1.4 MWt = 2.8 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 47%, Oc – 53%

2. Project costs

526 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

6 000 USD – consulting services of BOR (20% of cost)

85% of the grant amount

4. Project Implementation performance

Boiler House after the operational acceptance

Project completed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

20.2 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

3 537 tCO₂/year

General description:

CHP MPEC in Ostrow Wlkopolski

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Ostrow Wlkopolski

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2000 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Cogeneration unit:

Gas turbine 5.0 MWe, 8.8 MWt

Additional afterburners 2.8 MWt

Total: 11.6 MWt, 5.0 MWe

1. Financing plan

GEF - 58%, Oc – 42%

2. Project costs

5 789 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

Consulting services of the BOR covered by the boiler owner (BO)

4. Project Implementation performance

„Turn key" contract signed

5. Project cost-effectiveness

10.6 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

54 326 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in hospital in Koszalin

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Koszalin

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2000 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 7.7 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 43%, Oc – 17%, NF – 40%

2. Project costs

1 211 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

Consulting services of the BOR covered by the boiler owner (BO)

4. Project Implementation performance

Bids are being evaluated

5. Project cost-effectiveness

15.7 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

7 673 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB PEC in Poznan Hetmanska Street

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Poznan

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2000 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 3.72 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 47%, Oc – 53%

2. Project costs

715 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

15 000 USD -consulting services of BOR (30% of cost)

4. Project Implementation performance

Before „turn key" contract signing

5. Project cost-effectiveness

19.2 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

4 258 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB PEC in Rawa Mazowiecka "Solidarnosc"

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Rawa Mazowiecka

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2000 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 5.25 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 45%, Oc – 24%, NF – 31%

2. Project costs

1 080 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

15 000 USD -consulting services of BOR (30% of cost)

4. Project Implementation performance

Before „turn key" contract signing

5. Project cost-effectiveness

16.9 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

5 547 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB PEC in Wrzesnia

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Wrzesnia

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2000 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 1.44 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 48%, Oc – 52

2. Project costs

361 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

9 000 USD -consulting services of BOR (30% of cost)

4. Project Implementation performance

Before „turn key" contract signing

5. Project cost-effectiveness

24.9 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

2 192 tCO₂/year

General description:

CHP in Gdansk - Matarnia

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Gdansk

Activity starting date:

1999

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Cogeneration unit:

Gas turbine 2.0 MWe, 2.4 MWt

Gas boilers 8.2 MWt

Total: 10.6 MWt, 2.0 MWe

1. Financing plan

GEF – 58%, Oc – 42%

2. Project costs

3 872 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

60 000 USD -consulting services of BOR (30% of cost)

4. Project Implementation performance

Before bid announcement

5. Project cost-effectiveness

20.3 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

25 421 tCO₂/year

General description:

CHP in Swiebodzice

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Swiebodzice

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Cogeneration unit:

2 gas engines: 5.8 MWe, 6.8 MWt

2 gas boilers: 8.2 MW

Total: 15.0 MWt, 5.8 MWe

1. Financing plan

GEF – 60%, Oc – 40%

2. Project costs

6 658 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

60 000 USD -consulting services of BOR (30% of cost)

4. Project Implementation performance

Before „turn key" contract signing

5. Project cost-effectiveness

19.3 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

38 995 tCO₂/year

General description:

CHP in hospital in Piekary Slaskie

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Piekary Slaskie

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2000 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 2.7 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 40%, Oc - 10%, VF - 15%, NF – 35%

2. Project costs

972 0003668 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

15 000 USD -consulting services of BOR (10% of cost)

4. Project Implementation performance

Before bid announcement

5. Project cost-effectiveness

39.09 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

2 897 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in Pruszcz Gdanski

Obroncow Wybrzeza Street

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Pruszcz Gdanski

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 1.7 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF - 38%, Oc – 62%

2. Project costs

231 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Conceptual design prepared by BOR

5. Project cost-effectiveness

23.1 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

1 085 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in Janow Lubelski

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Janow Lubelski

Activity starting date:

1999

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 5.25 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 24%, other – 76%

2. Project costs

1 120 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Conceptual design prepared by BOR

5. Project cost-effectiveness

13.2 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

4 835 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in Krakow

Pradnicka Street

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Krakow

Activity starting date:

1999

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 9.0 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 41%, Oc – 59%

2. Project costs

1 088 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Conceptual design prepared by BOR

5. Project cost-effectiveness

13.8 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

6 848 tCO₂/year

General description:

CHP in Tarnow

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Tarnow

Activity starting date:

1999

Expected activity ending date:

2002 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Cogeneration unit:

Gas turbine 3.5 MWe, 9.0 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 61%, Oc – 39%

2. Project costs

3 340 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Grant agreement

5. Project cost-effectiveness

7.6 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

41 163 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in Prabuty

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Prabuty

Activity starting date:

1999

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 3.7 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 49%, Oc – 51%

2. Project costs

718 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Grant agreement

5. Project cost-effectiveness

22.4 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

4 941 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in Wabrzezno

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Wabrzezno

Activity starting date:

1999

Expected activity ending date:

2001 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 8.0 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 49%, Oc – 51%

2. Project costs

1 097 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Grant agreement

5. Project cost-effectiveness

19.3 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

4 320 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in Warsaw University

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Warsaw

Activity starting date:

1999 (estimated)

Expected activity ending date:

2002 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 3.4 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 26%, Oc – 74%

2. Project costs

423 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Approved by:

STAP 16 January 1997

MoE 10 January 1998

5. Project cost-effectiveness

14.5 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

2 861 tCO₂/year

General description:

CHP in Nasielsk

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Nasielsk

Activity starting date:

1999 (estimated)

Expected activity ending date:

2002 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Cogeneration unit:

Gas engines 2.8 MWe, 3.2 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 52%, Oc – 48%

2. Project costs

3 131 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Approved by:

STAP 28 January 1999

MoE 12 May 1999

5. Project cost-effectiveness

13.3 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

23 768 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in Leczyca

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Leczyca

Activity starting date:

1999 (estimated)

Expected activity ending date:

2002 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 3.5 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 52%, Oc – 48%

2. Project costs

440 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Approved by:

STAP 28 January 1999

MoE 12 May 1999

5. Project cost-effectiveness

12.2 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

6 373 tCO₂/year

General description:

HOB in Poznan

Rynarzewska Street

Type of project:^a)

Coal-to-gas conversion

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Poznan

Activity starting date:

1999 (estimated)

Expected activity ending date:

2002 (estimated)

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

17 years

Technical data:^d)

Gas boilers 4.6 MWt

1. Financing plan

GEF – 44%, Oc – 56%

2. Project costs

569 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

4. Project Implementation performance

Approved by:

STAP 28 January 1999

MoE 12 May 1999

5. Project cost-effectiveness

18.6 USD/tCO₂*

6. Planned environmental benefits

2 555 tCO₂/year

General description:

Building "62" - Kontkiewicza 62 street, Housing estate: Wyczerpy, Czestochowa

Co-operative JURA in Czestochowa

Multi family buildingBuilding space: 3055.7 m²Number of flats 49

Type of project:^a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Czestochowa

Activity starting date:

1996

Expected activity ending date:

July 30, 1997

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

50 years

Technical data:^d)

1. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.17 W/(m²K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 12 cm;

2. Improvement of the basement floor's insulation level to U=0.27 W/(m²K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 9cm;

3. Window's installation - heat-transfer coefficient of U=1.5 W/(m²K);

4. Application of mechanical ventilation;

5. Installation of heat recovery unit – capacity 91%;

6. Foamed polystyrene moulder "Thermomur" – extra charge over the required standard;

7. Installation of gas- oil boiler house above the cost of installation of boiler house with capacity of 90%.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 5.5%, Own means – 94.5%

2. Project costs

1 187 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

Energy Auditor verified all documents connected with the procurement of energy efficiency measures, submitted by the developer and established the final AIJ/GEF grant amount at 65 296.40 USD.

4. Project Implementation performance

The building is completed and commissioned. The final AIJ/GEF grant amount (65 296.40 USD) was calculated by Energy Auditor and reimbursed to the Developer. Monitoring report is being prepared by Energy Auditor.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

130.0 USD/tCO₂

6. Planned environmental benefits

61 tCO₂/year

General description:

Building "C" – Kontkiewicza street, Housing estate: Wyczerpy, Czestochowa

Co-operative JURA in Czestochowa

Multi family buildingBuilding space: 1541.6 m²Number of flats 24

Type of project:^a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Czestochowa

Activity starting date:

15 April 1997

Expected activity ending date:

March 1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

50 years

Technical data:^d)

1. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.17 W/(m²K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 12 cm;

2. Improvement of the basement floor's insulation level to U=0.27 W/(m²K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 9cm;

3. Window's installation - heat-transfer coefficient of U=1.5 W/(m²K);

4. Application of mechanical ventilation;

5. Installation of heat recovery unit - capacity 91%;

6. Foamed polystyrene moulder "Thermomur" – extra charge over the required standard.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 5.9% USD, Own means – 94.1%

2. Project costs

740 800 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

Energy Auditor verified all documents connected with the procurement of energy efficiency measures, submitted by the developer and established the final AIJ/GEF grant amount at 43 707.20 USD.

4. Project Implementation performance

The building is completed and commissioned. The final AIJ/GEF grant amount (43 707.20 USD) was calculated by Energy Auditor and reimbursed to the Developer. Monitoring report is being prepared by Energy Auditor.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

120.0 USD/tCO₂

6. Planned environmental benefits

31 tCO₂/year

General description:

Building "B" – Kontkiewicza street, Housing estate: Wyczerpy, CzestochowaCo-operative JURA in Czestochowa

Multi family buildingBuilding space: 1541.6 m²

Number of flats 24

Type of project:^a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Czestochowa

Activity starting date:

2 April 1997

Expected activity ending date:

March 1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

50 years

Technical data:^d)

1. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.17 W/(m²K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 12 cm;2. Improvement of the basement floor's insulation level to U=0.27 W/(m²K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 9cm;

3. Window's installation - heat-transfer coefficient of U=1.5 W/(m²K);

4. Application of mechanical ventilation;

5. Installation of heat recovery unit - capacity 91%,

6. Foamed polystyrene moulder "Thermomur" – extra charge over the required standard;

7. Solar collectors assembled at building no 62.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 5.9%, Own means – 94.1%

2. Project costs

744 600 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

Energy Auditor verified all documents connected with the procurement of energy efficiency measures, submitted by the developer and established the final AIJ/GEF grant amount at 43 933.89 USD.

4. Project Implementation performance

The building is completed and commissioned. The final AIJ/GEF grant amount (43 933.89 USD) was calculated by Energy Auditor and reimbursed to the Developer. Monitoring report is being prepared by Energy Auditor.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

98.0 USD/tCO₂

6. Planned environmental benefits

30 tCO₂/year

General description:

Housing Estate "ZIELONKI" composed of 21 single family buildings, built as 5 range buildings

"ACCORD" Krakow

Single family buildings constructed in "Canadian Technology":

Number of single family buildings 21

Total buildings space 2413.65 m²

Type of project:^a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Krakow

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

September 1998

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

50 years

Technical data:^d)

1. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.34, 0.39, 0.44 W/(m²K) by extra packing of insulation material;

2. Improvement of the roof insulation level to U=0.15 W/(m²K) - additionally enlargement of an insulation;

3. Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.1W/(m²K);

4. Installation of fixed external window shutters but only in 5 single family buildings.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 2%, Own means – 98%

2. Project costs

1 039 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

All energy efficiency measures are procured.

4. Project Implementation performance

The building is completed. The final AIJ/GEF grant amount (20 572.48 USD) was calculated by Energy Auditor and reimbursed to the Developer. Monitoring report is being prepared by Energy Auditor.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

26.0-30.0 USD/tCO₂

6. Planned environmental benefits

33 tCO₂/year

General description:

Housing Estate in Wilanow (Jara and Bruzdowa streets) composed of 41 single family buildings, built as 6 range buildings

"Housing Cooperative "Inicjatywa Ekologiczna" in Warsaw

Single family buildings:

Number of single family buildings 41

Total buildings space 7341.2 m²

Type of project:^a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Warsaw

Activity starting date:

July 1998

Expected activity ending date:

September 1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

50 years

Technical data:^d)

1. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.32, 0.37, 0.42 W/(m²K);

2. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.14 W/(m²K);

3. Improvement of floor's insulation level to R=2.60 (m²K)/W;

4. Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.1 W/(m²K);

5. Application of mechanical ventilation with heat recovery unit - capacity 91%;

6. Sun collectors and warm tank;

7. Iron inserted piece capable for the fireplace with water jacket.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 9.3%, Own means – 90.7%

2. Project costs

3 387 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

Because of the change of the technology of external walls, the energy audit covering this change is being made. (Paid from the own sources of developer).

4. Project Implementation performance

Average about 70% of the total raw opened state of the buildings.

The members of Housing Cooperative decided which energy efficiency measures will be used.

The reduction of energy efficiency measures is expected.

Energy Auditor is examining the compliance of the projects with AIJ/GEF criteria. (Paid by Beneficiaries)

5. Project cost-effectiveness

37.0-42.0 USD/tCO₂

6. Planned environmental benefits

289 tCO₂/year

General description:

Housing Estate "KOWALE B" composed of 23 multifamily buildings

Towarzystwo Inwestycyjne "INVESTING" SA

Gdansk

23 multi family buildings:

Number of flats 183,

Total buildings space 11 097.94 m²

Type of project:^a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Gdansk

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

30 June 1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

50 years

Technical data:^d)

1. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.37, 0.47, 0.42 W/(m²K);

2. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.23 W/(m²K);

3. Improvement of floor's insulation level to R=2.82 (m²K)/W;

4 Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.6 W/(m²K);

5. Application of mechanical ventilation and heat recovery unit;

6. Programme temperature controller.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 6.5%, Own means – 93.5%

2. Project costs

4 493 200 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

All energy efficiency measures have been procured and installed.

4. Project Implementation performance

The buildings are completed. The final AIJ/GEF grant amount (292 059 USD) was calculated by Energy Auditor and was approved by World Bank.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

96.0-114.0 USD/tCO₂

6. Planned environmental benefits

248 tCO₂/year

General description:

Housing Estate in Myslowice close to Katowice, composed of 19 single family buildings

OIKOS Sp. z o.o., Katowice

Single family buildings:

Number of single family buildings 19

Total buildings space 4836 m²

Type of project:^a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Myslowice close to Katowice

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

30 September 1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

50 years

Technical data:^d)

1. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.31, 0.36, 0.41 W/(m²K) by extra packing of insulation material;

2. Improvement of the roof insulation level to U=0.24 W/(m²K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation;

3. Improvement of floor's insulation level to R=2.60 (m²K)/W;

4. Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.5W/(m²K).

1. Financing plan

GEF – 1.9%, Own means – 98.1%

2. Project costs

1 730 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

All energy efficiency measures are procured.

4. Project Implementation performance

Energy Auditor is verifying all documents submitted by the developer.

The status of construction is following:

13 buildings – completed;

6 buildings - last internal works are conducted.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

77.0-79.0 USD/tCO₂

6. Planned environmental benefits

37 tCO₂/year

General description:

Multi family building

Berenta/Micinskiego street,

Wroclaw

ARCHICOM Sp. z o.o.

Multi family building:

Building space: 6051.17 m²;

Number of flats 65.

Type of project:^a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Wroclaw

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

March 1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

50 years

Technical data:^d)

1. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.22 W/(m²K);

2. Improvement of the garden floor's insulation level to U=0.22 W/(m²K) – additionally enlargement of an insulation with a thickness of 9cm;

3. Improvement of the walls insulation level to U=0.52, 0.57, 0.62 W/(m²K);

4. Window's installation – heat- transfer coefficient of U=1.1 W/(m²K);

5. Heaters with small water capacity.

1. Financing plan

GEF – 1%, Own means – 99%

2. Project costs

3 118 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

All energy efficiency measures are procured.

4. Project Implementation performance

The building is completed. Energy Auditor is verifying all documents submitted by the developer.

The final grant amount is being calculated.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

32.0 USD/tCO₂

6. Planned environmental benefits

26 tCO₂/year

General description:

Single Family buildings built as 3 double-flat buildings by Housing Cooperative "Przylesie" in Koszalin;

6 single-family buildings built as 3 buildings with 2 apartments each;

Total buildings space 1027.8 m².

Type of project:^a)

Energy Efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):

Koszalin

Activity starting date:

1998

Expected activity ending date:

September 1999

Stage of activity:^b)

Mutually agreed / in progress / completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:^c)

50 years

Technical data:^d)

1. Improvement of the walls insulation level;

2. Improvement of the roof's insulation level to U=0.22 W/(m²K);

3. Improvement of floor's insulation level;

4. Window's installation - heat- transfer coefficient of U= 1.6 W/(m²K).

1. Financing plan

GEF – 1.2%, Own means – 98.8%

2. Project costs

696 000 USD

3. Accomplishment of:

- orders

- expenditures

All energy efficiency buildings were procured.

4. Project Implementation performance

Energy Auditor is verifying all documents submitted by the developer.

The final grant amount is being calculated.

5. Project cost-effectiveness

26.0 USD/tCO₂

6. Planned environmental benefits

11 tCO₂/year