|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
List of Projects
Uniform Reporting Format:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
A. Description of project
-
Title of project:
|
The Model Project for Utilization of Waste Heat from Incineration of Refuse
|
Participants/actors:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
|
|
Department:
|
International Cooperation Center
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
NEDO
|
|
Function within activity:
|
(standard classifiers to be developed)
|
|
Street:
|
1-1, 3-chome Higashi-Ikebukuro, Toshima-ku
|
|
Post code:
|
170-6028
|
|
City:
|
Tokyo
|
|
Country:
|
Japan
|
|
Telephone:
|
81-3-3987-9313
|
|
Fax:
|
81-3-5992-2290
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.nedo.go.jp
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Kigasawa
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Takaji
|
|
Job title:
|
Director
|
|
Direct tel:
|
81-3-3987-9466
|
|
Direct fax:
|
81-3-3987-5103
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
kigasawatkj@nedo.go.jp
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Ebara Corporation
|
|
Department:
|
Environmental Plant Division
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
EBARA
|
|
Function within activity:
|
(standard classifiers to be developed)
|
|
Street:
|
1-6-27, Kohnan, Minato-ku
|
|
Post code:
|
108-8480
|
|
City:
|
Tokyo
|
|
Country:
|
Japan
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Konuma
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Hozumi
|
|
Job title:
|
Deputy General Manger
|
|
Direct tel:
|
81-3-5461-6201
|
|
Direct fax:
|
81-3-5461-6082
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
konuma@shi.ebara.co.jp
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
The Ministry of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China
|
|
Department:
|
Department of Social Development
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
MOST
|
|
Function within activity:
|
|
|
Street:
|
15B Fuxing Road
|
|
Post code:
|
100862
|
|
City:
|
Beijing
|
|
Country:
|
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Lu
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Xuedu
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel:
|
86 10 68514054
|
|
Direct fax:
|
86 10 68512163
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
lvxd@cs.sstc.gov.cn
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
The State Development Planning Commission
People’s Republic of China
|
|
Department:
|
Department of Raw and Processed Materials Industries and Resources Utilization
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
SDPC
|
|
Function within activity:
|
(standard classifiers to be developed)
|
|
Street:
|
38S Yuetan Street,
|
|
Post code:
|
100824
|
|
City:
|
Beijing
|
|
Country:
|
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel:
|
|
|
Direct fax:
|
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Planning Committee of Hei Long Jiang Province, People’s Republic of China
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
PCHLJ
|
|
Function within activity:
|
(standard classifiers to be developed)
|
|
Street:
|
202 Zongshan Road
|
|
Post code:
|
150001
|
|
City:
|
Harbin
|
|
Country:
|
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Zhang
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Jian Ping
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel:
|
86-451-2631676
|
|
Direct fax:
|
86-451-2628547
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
The Garbage Incineration Plant of Harbin City
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
GIPHC
|
|
Function within activity:
|
(standard classifiers to be developed)
|
|
Street:
|
|
|
Post code:
|
150038
|
|
City:
|
Harbin
|
|
Country:
|
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Lu
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Ze Min
|
|
Job title:
|
Vice Bureau Chief
|
|
Direct tel:
|
86-451-3645902
|
|
Direct fax:
|
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Planning Committee Harbin Municipal People’s Government
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
PCH
|
|
Function within activity:
|
(standard classifiers to be developed)
|
|
Street:
|
Daoli District
|
|
Post code:
|
150010
|
|
City:
|
Harbin
|
|
Country:
|
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Tian
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Ru
|
|
Job title:
|
Director
|
|
Direct tel:
|
86-461-4411-562
|
|
Direct fax:
|
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Tsinghua University
|
|
Department:
|
Institute of Nuclear Energy Technology / Institute for Techno-Economics & Energy Systems Analysis
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
INET/ITEESA
|
|
Function within activity:
|
(standard classifiers to be developed)
|
|
Street:
|
Tsinghua Yuan Street, Haidian District
|
|
Post code:
|
100084
|
|
City:
|
Beijing
|
|
Country:
|
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Telephone:
|
86-10-62783655 or 86-10-6277-0322
|
|
Fax:
|
86-10-6277-1150
|
|
E-mail:
|
Liuds@tsinghua.edu.cn
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.inet.tsinghua.edu.cn
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Liu
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Deshun
|
|
Job title:
|
Professor
|
|
Direct tel:
|
86-10-6278-3655
|
|
Direct fax:
|
86-10-6277-1150
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Liuds@tsinghua.edu.cn
|
3) Activity:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description :
|
The objective of the Project is to contribute to the utilization of unused energy and consequently the
protection of the environment in P.R.China by installing a municipal waste incinerating facility and a heat
recovery facility to the Garbage Incineration Plant of Harbin City and disseminating the technology in
P.R.China.
|
|
Type of project :
|
Waste disposal
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region,
State):
|
The Garbage Incineration Plant of Harbin City, Xiangfang, Harbin, 150038, The People’s Republic of
China
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
September, 1998
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
March,2002
|
|
Stage of activity:
|
Mutually agreed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:
|
20 years
|
|
Technical data:
|
Annual amount of municipal waste (the waste expected to be incinerated after completion of the project);
57,646 t/a
- Baseline
- CH4 emission from the municipal waste landfill : 2,164.5 t-CH4/a
- CO2 emission : 95,642.8 t-CO2/a
- Project Case
- CH4 emission from the municipal waste landfill=0
- CO2 emission : 92,184.9 t-CO2/a
( 78,201t-CO2/a by IPCC Guideline Approach )
|
4) Cost (to the extent possible): 1US$=120 Japanese Yen; 1US$=8.27Chinese RMB;
Base year :1999
|
Item
|
|
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
Total
|
|
Cost of the project in US1000$
|
Japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
China
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of AIJ component in US1000$
|
Japan
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,674
|
|
China
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,894
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,568
|
|
US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent (T- CO2)
|
40.04
(Including running cost)
(31.14)
|
Cost of the project given above is based on the budget.
Detail analysis is given in Attachment 1 where discount rate , running cost etc. are taken into account.
5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involved :
|
|
Basic Agreement concerning the execution of this project was concluded between NEDO and SDPC and PCHLJ on
September 3, 1998.
NEDO concluded with EBARA to trust to execute Japanese scope of this project in December 4, 1998.
EBARA and PCH concluded the Execution Document which described the concrete specification of this project
in March 12, 1999 and started the design and engineering of the project.
|
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
1) For the activity:
This report is the first report and copies of letters of endorsement by each designated national authority of
Parties are attached.
Describe:
|
MOST and NEDO concluded the "Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation in the Model Project for
Utilization of Waste Heat from Incineration of Refuse as a AIJ Project under the Pilot Phase" on
September 25, 1998 and the Chinese government confirmed NEDO to implement this project as AIJ under pilot
phase. The Ministry of International Trade and Industry of Japan (MITI) approved NEDO to implement this
project as Activity Implemented Jointly - Japan Program on June 17, 1998.The Japanese government confirmed
the project on June 23,1999.
The Ministry of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China (MOST) confirmed this project as
Activity Implemented Jointly (AIJ) under pilot phase on July 9,1999.
|
2) This report is a joint report:
Yes, forward copy of agreement/endorsement by the designated national authorities involved
-
No, this is a separate report. The reports are submitted separately by the
-
designated national authority of each and every participating Party.
3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
-
Many data may not be accurate due to
insufficient information and lack of uniformed methodologies
which may be updated later on.
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio-economic and environment
priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national economic
development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies
|
|
As energy supply and demand issues and protection of the global environment have become the focus of
worldwide interest, NEDO is promoting energy conservation model projects in Asian countries including China
to contribute to the effective use of energy and improvement of environmental pollution.
In China, as strong national policy for energy conservation and environmental protection, relating laws
have come into effect.
As a joint project between Japan and China, this project will contribute to reductions in local and
regional pollutants such as SOx, NOx and dust as well as greenhouse gas mitigation such as CH4,
CO2.
The economic benefits of the project include reduction in energy consumption in textile factory .
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
Emissions of SOx, NOx, soot and smoke are reduced by the reduction of fuel consumption in the existing
factory.
Amount of CH4 generated from the landfill of municipal waste is reduced.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
No
|
|
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:
|
Technical transferring effect to the counterpart country is expected.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?
|
No.
|
|
Describe economic benefits in detail:
|
Cost reduction caused by the reduction of fuel consumption is expected.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?
|
No.
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real, measurable
and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not have occurred in
the absence of such activities
1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
|
Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:
|
|
(Baseline)
In Harbin city, the municipal waste is not incinerated, but landfilled. At the existing textile factory,
they get steam for power generation, for processing and for the heating by the existing boilers, which are
fueled by coal. The landfilling causes huge amount of methane(CH4) emission from the site, and
combusting coal at the factory generates carbon dioxide(CO2).
The AIJ project in Harbin city aims to build the Garbage Incineration Plant of Harbin City, to recover the
heat from incineration and to supply the heat to the existing plant. In this way, CH4 emission
from the landfill site should decrease and also CO2 emission should be reduced by reducing
consumption of coal at the existing plant.
We shall define our baseline as below.
Present condition: The municipal waste to be combusted by the Harbin city project is now landfilled and so
generating CH4.
2. Present condition: At the textile factory in Harbin city, combusting coals for generating steam causes
CO2 emission.
|
|
(Calculation)
1 . The amount of CH4 emission from the municipal waste landfill( ECH4 )
ECH4 = G × f1 × f2 × f3 × f4 × 16/12 = 2,164.5 t-CH4/a
G : Annual amount of municipal waste (the waste expected to be incinerated after
executing the project); 57,646 t-waste/a
f1 : ratio on treating waste by land-filling ; 1.0
f2 : the content of organic carbon in waste ; 0.1788
f3 : ratio on gasification of organic carbon in landfill ;0.63
f4 : fraction of C as CH4 to C as biogas ; 0.25
2 . CO2 emission from the existing boilers (ECO2 )
Eco2 = W1 × C1 × Bf1 × 44/12 = 95,642.8
t-CO2/a
W1: coal consumption by the existing boilers (average consumption of the local coal for the
latest three years ) W1=(69,000 t/a + 61,000 t/a + 58,000 t/a) / 3 = 62,666.7 t/a C1
: the carbon content of the local coal (Hegang coal) ; 48.4 % Bf1: the burning efficiency of the
existing boiler ; 86 %
|
|
(Results)
By the calculation above, CH4 and CO2 emissions at baseline are:
( 1 ) CH4 emission
ECH4 = 2,164.5 t-CH4/a
( 2 ) CO2 emission
Eco2 = 95,642.8 t-CO2/a
|
2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
|
Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:
|
|
(Concept)
Although IPCC Guideline suggests that CO2 emission caused by incinerating waste derived from
biomass raw material should not be considered as net anthropogenic CO2 emission, both Japanese
participants and Chinese participants agreed to take note on the view that some part of decomposed carbon
from municipal waste derived from biomass raw material will not degrade to form CO2 but stay as
carbon in the municipal waste landfill, therefore, when the municipal waste is incinerated, net
CO2 emission will occur.
Therefore, both parties agreed to calculate in two ways, one according to IPCC Guideline, the other taking
non-degrade carbon into account.
Since the difference between two methods exists in the calculation of CO2 emission generated by
incinerating waste derived from biomass raw material, calculation according to IPCC Guideline is given
first as follows:
In the calculation below, we consider only municipal waste which will be incinerated after completion of
the Harbin project. The rest of the municipal waste will be landfilled as it has been landfilled in the
baseline case, and will give the same amount of GHG emissions for the baseline case and the project case.
PROJECT CASE:
CH4 emission from landfill becomes zero because the municipal waste is incinerated.
Further, existing boilers which has been supplied heat energy for the textile factory require less coal
because some part of the heat requirement for the factory is covered by heat recovered from incineration
plant.
-
On the other hand, the incineration plant of Harbin project requires electricity, accordingly net
CO2 emission occurs.
-
Furthermore, coal, an auxiliary fuel for the incineration plant, is burnt when the calorific value of the
waste is not enough, and net CO2 emission occurs.
-
When incinerating the waste which have anthropogenic origins, such as plastics and chemical fabrics, net
CO2 emission occurs.
|
|
(Calculation)
1 . The amount of CH4 emission from the municipal waste landfill (ECH4 )
ECH4’= t- CH4/a
2 . CO2 emission from the existing coal fired boilers (E 1')
E1’ = W1’ × C1 × Bf1 × 44/12 = 63,497.6 t-CO2/a
W1’ : coal consumption by the existing boilers after executing the project
W1’= W1 - H1x103 /Q1 = 62,666.7- 72.98 x
103/3.465 = 41,604.7 t/a
H1 : heat quantity of generated steam from the municipal waste incineration plant ;72.98 Tcal/a
Q1 : heat quantity of steam generated from combusting 1t of coal in the existing boilers
Q1 = Q2 × h /100 = 3.465 Gcal-steam/t
Q2 : calorific value of the local coal; 4.62 Gcal/t
h : efficiency of the existing boilers: 75 %
C1: the carbon content of the local coal (Hegang coal) ; 48.4 %
Bf1: the burning efficiency of the existing boiler ; 86 %
3 . Amount of CO2 emitted for generating additional electric power necessary for operation of
the municipal waste incineration plant ( E2’ )
E2’ = Elec × 24 h/d × D × Q3 = 5,220 t-CO2/a
Elec : electric power consumption of the municipal waste incineration plant ; 623 kwh/h
D : annual working days of the municipal waste incineration plant ; 320 d/a
Q3 : CO2 emission by generating 1kwh electric power at the power plant
Providing electric power to the municipal waste incineration plant
Q3 = W2 × Ccoal × 44/12 = 1.091 × 10-3 t-CO2/kwh
W2 : coal consumption for generating 1kwh; 410 gce/kwh
Ccoal :carbon emission factor per ton of coal equivalent = 0.726 t-C/tce
4 . CO2 emission by incinerating municipal waste of anthropogenic sources (plastics and chemical
fabrics) at the incineration plant ( E3’ )
E3’ = Cplf × 44/12 = 5,027 t-CO2/a
Cplf : annual amount of carbon in plastics and chemical fabrics which are included in municipal waste to be
combusted
Cplf=Cplf1 + Cplf2 + Cplf3 + Cplf4 = 1,371 t-C/a
(1) For the first period
Cplf1 = amount of carbon in plastics and chemical fabrics which are included in municipal waste
for the first period (from Jan. to Mar).
Cplf1 = G1 × D1 × (1 - w 1/100) ×
PFc1 /100 x 285.6 t-C
G1: daily amount of municipal waste incineration for the first period ; 150t-wet/d
D1: working days of the municipal waste incineration for the first period ; 75 days
w 1: water content in municipal waste for the first period; 33.89 %
PFc1:carbon content in plastics and chemical fabrics which are included in municipal waste for
the first period ; 3.84 %-dry-waste
(2) For the second period
Cplf2 : amount of carbon in plastics and chemical fabrics which are included in municipal waste
for the second period (from Apr. to Jun.)
Cplf2 = G2 × D2 × (1 - w 2/100) ×
PFc2 /100 = 468.9 t-C
G2 : daily amount of municipal waste incineration for the second period; 200t-wet/d
D2:working days of the municipal waste incineration plant for the second period ; 91 days
w 2 : water content in municipal waste for the second period ; 56.26 %
PFc2 : carbon content in plastics and chemical fabrics which are included in municipal waste for
the second period ; 5.89 %-dry-waste
(3) For the third period
Cplf3: amount of carbon in plastics and chemical fabrics which are included in municipal waste
for the third period (from Jul. to Sep.)
Cplf 3: G3 × D3 × (1 - w 3/100) ×
PFc3 /100 = 78.8 t-C G3 : daily amount of municipal waste incineration for the third
period ; 158t-wet/d D3 : working days of the municipal waste incineration plant for the third
period ; 62 days
w 3 : water content in municipal waste for the third period ; 70.96 % PFc3 : carbon
content in plastics and chemical fabrics which are included in municipal waste for the third period ; 2.77
% -dry-waste For the fourth period
Cplf4 : amount of carbon in plastics and chemical fabrics which are included in municipal waste
for the fourth period (from Oct. to Dec.)
Cplf4: G4 × D4 × (1 - w 4/100) × PFc4
/100 = 537.7 t-C
G4 = daily amount of municipal waste incineration for the fourth period ; 200 t-wet/d
D4 : working days of the municipal waste incineration plant for the fourth period ; 92 days w
4 : water content in municipal waste for the fourth period ; 54.83 % PFc4 : carbon
content in plastics and chemical fabrics which are included in municipal waste for the fourth period ; 6.47
% -dry-waste
5 . CO2 emission by combusting coal as auxiliary fuel at the municipal waste incineration plant
(E4’)
E4’ : W1 × ý1 × Bf2 × 44/12 = 4,457.0
t-CO2/a
W3 : coal consumption as auxiliary fuel at the municipal waste incineration plant
W3= Q4 x 103 / Q2 = 2,536.8 t/a
Q4: heat quantity required as auxiliary fuel ; 11.72 Tcal/a
Q2 : calorific value of the local coal ; 4.62 Gcal/t
C1 : the carbon content of the local coal (Hegang coal) ;48.4 %
Bf2 : the burning efficiency of the incineration boiler ; 99 %
Calculations above are based on the IPCC Guideline in which CO2 emission generated by
incinerating waste derived from biomass raw material should not be considered as net anthropogenic
CO2 emission. As written on the first part of this section, Japanese participants and Chinese
participants agreed to calculate CO2 emission generated by incinerating waste derived from
biomass raw material, taking non-degrade carbon into account as shown below:
- CO2 emission by combusting the organic carbon which is not degraded in the municipal waste
landfilled (E5’)
E5’ = G × f1 × f2 × (1-f3) × 44/12 = 13,983.3 t-CO2/a
(0) ..for IPCC Guideline approach
G : Annual amount of municipal waste (the waste expected to be incinerated after completion the
project); 57,646 t-waste/a
f1 : ratio on treating waste by land-filling ; 1.0
7 . CH4 and CO2 emissions after completion of the project
(1) CH4 emission(ECH4’)
( ECH4’) = t-CH4/a
(2) CO2 emission (Eco2’)
Eco2’=E1’ + E2’ + E3’ +
E4’ + E5’ = 92,184.9 t-CO2/a
(78,201.6)
8 . Reduced amount of CH4 and CO2 emissions derived by subtracting the amount after
executing the project from the baseline amount
(1) Reduced amount of CH4 (RCH4)
RCH4 + ECH4 - ECH4’ + 2,164.5 - 0 = 2,164.5 t-CH4/a
(2) Reduced amount of CO2 (Rco2)
Rco2 = Eco2 - Eco2’ = 95,642.8 - 92,184.9 - 3,457.9
t-CO2/a
(78,201.6) (17,441.2)
|
|
(Results)
Total reduced amount of CO2 emission
in which : Reduced amount of CH4 emission
Reduced amount of CO2 emission
|
: 48,912.4 ton of CO2 equivalent
annually (62,895.7)
: 2,164.5 ton of CH4 annually
: 3,457.9 ton of CO2 annually
(17,441.2)
|
NOTE : Numbers in ( ) show results obtained by IPCC Guideline approach.
Reference : Revised 1996, IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Reference Manual, 6. Waste,
6.1 Overview
Summary table: Projected emission reductions (unit: 1,000ton/year):
|
GHG
|
1999
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
2003
|
2010
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
95.64
|
95.64
|
95.64
|
95.64
|
95.64
|
95.64
|
|
CH4
|
2.16
|
2.16
|
2.16
|
2.16
|
2.16
|
2.16
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenario
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
93.05 (82.56)
|
92.18
(78.20)
|
92.18 (78.20)
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
0
|
0
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
2.59 (13.08)
|
3.46 (17.44)
|
3.46
(17.44)
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
2.16
|
2.16
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
2.59 (13.08)
|
6.05 (30.52)
|
30.27 (152.6)
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
3.78
|
18.9
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Numbers in ( ) show results obtained by IPCC Guideline approach.
The calculations above are based on the schedule as follow:
Completion of construction : March, 2002
Starting-up operation : April, 2002
F. Additionally to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework
of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows
|
Category of funding
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(US dollars)
|
|
Subsidy for improving international energy use (Japanese national budget which is undertaken by MITI )
|
4.6 million US$ (1997FY-1998FY)
(n/a for the budget on and after 1999)
|
|
Own Capital (prepared by Chinese side)
|
|
1US$ = 120 Japanese Yen
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other
Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the Convention. In
this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of endogenous capacities
and technologies of developing country Parties
|
Transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how
|
Describe briefly
|
|
Transfer of Municipal Waste Incineration Technology
|
The municipal waste incineration plant consists of fluidized bed type incinerator, waste heat boiler,
combustion gas treatment facility and so on. Steam is recovered from waste heat generated in incinerating
municipal waste.
The project demonstrates that recovered steam can replace steam generated from combustion of coal.
|
|
Capacity Building
|
|
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties, effects,
impacts or other obstacles encountered
1) Any practical experience gained:
|
Since the Project is a Model Project, dissemination activity of the technology through demonstration
operation is planned in the final stage of overall project schedule. A lager effect of energy conservation
and environmental improvement would be expected through dissemination of the technology in the future
|
2)Technical difficulties:
|
Since the municipal waste incineration technology had been widely disseminated in Japan and enough
practical and commercial experience has been already compiled, the technology is highly reliable. By this
reason, technical difficulty does not exist.
|
3) Negative impacts and/or effects encountered:
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental negative impacts/effects in detail :
|
No environmental negative impacts/effects are expected so far.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental negative impacts/effects?
|
No.
|
|
Describe social/cultural negative impacts/effects in detail :
|
No social/cultural negative impacts/effects are expected so far.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social negative impacts/effects?
|
No, so far.
|
|
Describe economic negative impacts/effects in detail :
|
No economic negative impacts/effects are expected so far.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic negative impacts/effects?
|
No, so far.
|
4) Other obstacles encountered:
None, so far.
5) Other:
None, so far.
Attachment 1
|
Unit
|
Dynamic
Case I
|
Dynamic
Case II
|
|
Discount rate
|
%
|
8.000
|
8.000
|
|
The capital investment for the municipal waste incineration plant
|
104 US$
|
1656.771
|
1656.771
|
|
The return investment per year(A)
|
104 US$
|
168.746
|
168.746
|
|
Operating cost per year (B)
|
104 US$
|
78.044
|
78.044
|
|
Total cost (A+B)
|
104 US$
|
246.790
|
246.790
|
|
Cost of coal reduced by the existing boiler (C)
|
104 US$
|
50.936
|
50.936
|
|
Net incremental cost (A+B-C)
|
104 US$
|
195.854
|
195.854
|
|
Amount of municipal waste incinerated per year
|
104 ton
|
5.765
|
5.765
|
|
CO2 emission reduced per year
|
104 ton
|
4.891
|
6.289
|
|
Cost of reduced CO2 emission per ton
|
US$/ton
|
40.043
|
31.142
|
Note:
1.Case I : CO2 emission by combusting the organic carbon which is not degraded in the municipal waste
landfill is counted.
2.Case II : CO2 emission by combusting the organic carbon which is not degraded in the municipal
waste landfill is not counted for IPCC Guideline approach in 1996.
3. As for landfill, neither cost nor amount of CO2 emission is taken into account because the cost
and amount of CO2 emission are negligibly small.
|