NEGOTIATIONS
FOCUS
PROCESS
KEY STEPS
|
|
Your location: Home |
|
|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY(AIJ)
|
USIJI Uniform Reporting Document:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
List of
Projects
A. Description of the AIJ project
1. Title of project: Rio Hondo II Hydroelectric Project
2. Host country: Guatemala
3. Brief project description:
- Rio Hondo II entails construction of a dam on the Rio Colorado and a 50MW peaking hydroelectric power
plant that is expected to generate 142 GWh annually to the grid, offsetting 141 thousand Tonnes of CO2 per
year, or 2.3 million Tonnes over the project’s planned 20-year lifetime.
4. Participants:
|
Name of Organization or Individual
|
Country
|
|
Oficina Guatemalteca de Implementacion Conjunta
|
Guatemala
|
|
Roberto Figueroa
|
Guatemala
|
|
Jeffrey Keeler
|
United States
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Oficina Guatemalteca de Implementacion Conjunta
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
Guatemalan Joint Implementation Office
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
OGIC
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
Executive Director
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Government Regulation/Oversight
|
|
Street
|
Torre 1 Oficina 402, Diagonal 6
|
|
City
|
Guatemala
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
10-65 zona 10
|
|
Country
|
Guatemala
|
|
Telephone
|
+502.332.7952
|
|
Fax
|
+502.332.7958
|
|
E-mail
|
Investinguat@guate.net
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Dopazo
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Eduardo
|
|
Job title
|
Executive Director
|
|
Direct telephone
|
+502.332.7952 x 56
|
|
Direct fax
|
As above
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
As above
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
|
|
First name, middle name
|
|
|
Job title
|
|
|
Direct telephone
|
|
|
Direct fax
|
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
or
Name of individual if unaffiliated with any organization
|
Enron – Central America
|
|
Name of organization (English)
|
|
|
Acronym (original language)
|
|
|
Acronym (English)
|
|
|
Department
|
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project development/Administration
|
|
Street
|
6a Avenida 1-36, Zona 14, Edificio los Arcos 40 Nivel
|
|
City
|
Ciudad de Guatemala
|
|
State
|
|
|
Post code
|
01014
|
|
Country
|
Guatemala
|
|
Telephone
|
+502.368.1858
|
|
Fax
|
+502.368.2555
|
|
E-mail
|
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Figueroa or Melinchon
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Roberto Ermes
|
|
Job title
|
Country Manager
|
|
Direct telephone
|
As above or 713/646-7475
|
|
Direct fax
|
As above
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Keeler
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Jeffrey
|
|
Job title
|
Director, Environmental Strategies
|
|
Direct telephone
|
202/466-9157
|
|
Direct fax
|
202/331-4717
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
JKeeler@enron.com
|
-
5. Description of AIJ project activities
|
Item
|
|
|
Type of Project
|
|
Sector(s)
|
Energy
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Renewable Energy Generation
|
|
Project Location
|
|
Country
|
Guatemala
|
|
Exact location (city, state, region)
|
Rio Colorado Basin, Department of Zacapa
|
|
Key Dates and Current Stage of Project
|
|
Project starting date (month/year)
|
03/2001 (construction begins)
|
|
Project ending date (month/year)
|
06/2023
|
|
Project lifetime (years)
|
20
|
|
Current stage of project
|
Mutually agreed
|
|
General Project Description and Technical Data
|
|
Project Objectives: Guatemala has been experiencing steady double-digit growth in
electricity demand for the past decade, and following Hurricane Mitch, the demand has intensified.
Finding ways to generate the needed electricity from indigenous, renewable resources will help the
country grow in a more sustainable way.
Project activities: The Rio Hondo II Hydroelectric project will help meet this demand for
electricity by producing 142 GWh per year of electricity delivered to the national grid system.
Construction of the Project dam will be on the Rio Colorado, which together with the Rio Agua Fria
form the Rio Hondo. A penstock will be constructed from the new dam to a powerhouse located 1000
meters below in the lower reaches of the Rio Hondo basin. The project will be placed upstream of
the Rio Hondo I facility (which was damaged in Hurricane Mitch and its capacity has been removed
from the grid). The present Rio Hondo I transmission line will be upgraded to connect the
electrical generators at the project to the Panaluya substation, integrating the project’s
power into the national grid. An access road will also be built for the construction of the project
dam, penstock, and powerhouse. Several kilometers of existing roads will be upgraded as part of
this project.
Project Site: Rio Hondo II will be located in the sub-basin of the Rio Colorado, on the
Sierra de las Minas range approximately 140 km to the east of Guatemala City in the Department of
Zacapa. The sub-basin belongs to the municipality of Rio Hondo and falls within the coordinates of
15.03’ and 15.10’ north latitude, and 89.35’ and 89.42’ west longitude. The
area is located on the crests and sides of Monte Verde, an area characterized by steep hillsides
and crossed by small rivers. The Projects has an area of influence of 40 sq. km from its highest
point in the basin to the reservoir, and 15 sq. km from the reservoir to the Rio Motagua.
Types of data: The Project is expected to generate reductions of approximately 141,186 tons
of CO2 per year beyond that which would have otherwise occurred using the baseline fuels set by
OGIC. These are current estimates, based on estimated 142 GWh of electricity delivered to the grid.
Actual emission reductions will depend on actual performance of delivered electricity, which will
be monitored as part of the power purchase agreement.
|
-
6. Cost
-
(a) Explanation of methodology for calculating cost data
|
Methodology for Calculating Cost Data
|
|
For business reasons, we prefer to keep the cost details proprietary.
|
-
(b) Cost data–Project development
Itemized Project Development Costs
|
Year(s)
|
Type of Cost Incurred
|
Amount
(US$)
|
|
1999
|
US IJI application process
|
60,000
|
|
Total
|
60,000
|
-
(c) Cost data–Project implementation
Itemized Project Implementation Costs
|
Year(s)
|
Item
|
Projected Amount
(US$)
|
Actual Amount
(US$)
|
|
Project Costs
|
|
|
|
2000-01
|
Project Development and finalization
|
confidential
|
|
|
2001-3
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
2003-2023
|
Operation
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
0
|
0
|
|
Project Revenues
|
|
|
|
2003-2023
|
Electricity generation
|
confidential
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
0
|
0
|
|
Net Project Cost (Project Costs-Project Revenues)
|
0
|
0
|
-
7. Monitoring and verification of AIJ project activities and results
|
Item
|
Please Complete
|
|
Party(ies) that will be monitoring project activities
|
Project operators, Guatemalan officials
|
|
Party(ies) that will be externally verifying project results
|
Not yet decided
|
|
Date when the monitoring plan became (or will become) operational (month/year)
|
Upon completion of Project and start of electricity delivery to the grid (estimated 2004)
|
|
Types of data that will be collected
|
Electricity supplied to the grid
|
|
Description of Monitoring and Verification Activities and Schedule for Implementation
|
|
OGIC officials in conjunction with the Project development team will be involved in monitoring the
process or designating the individual(s) to monitor and audit the Project’s components
according to the international standards and requirements for monitoring and verification programs.
The Project will install appropriate instrumentation in the power station in order to monitor the
electricity generated. This will provide the necessary data to quantify and verify the total
emissions avoided. GHG reductions will be determined from official generation data supplied by the
facility and correlated with INDE (the national electricity board) and Guatemala government records
of the electricity received at the grid.
All parties will agree to annual external verification by independent auditors that meet
international standards and qualifications.
|
|
Item
|
Please Complete
|
|
Please check one of the following.
|
This report is a first report.
or
This report is an intermediate report.
or
This report is a final report.
|
|
Please check one of the following:
|
This report is a joint report. Letter(s) of approval of this report from the designated national
authority of the other Party(ies) involved in the activity is (are) attached in Section J, Annex.
or
This report is a separate report.
|
|
Additional comments (if any):
|
This is the first report submitted following the initial application for approval from US IJI. It
is being submitted without additional copies of the original letters of approval to avoid
redundancy.
|
-
C. Compatibility with, and supportiveness of, national economic development and socioeconomic and
environmental priorities and strategies
|
Compatibility with Economic Development and Socioeconomic and Environmental Priorities
|
|
Due to the double-digit growth in demand for electricity, more power is needed to fuel
Guatemala’s economic growth. To the extent that electricity can be provided using indigenous,
renewable resources, the country will save on operating costs, environmental
‘externalities’ costs, and foreign exchange (no need to import fuel). Some jobs will be
provided by the project construction, as well as in the monitoring of the project and the
surrounding biosphere.
The deforestation of several hectares (approximately 1000 trees) in the construction process will
be reforested, most likely above and beyond the original state of secondary growth forest. The
harvested trees will be sold, rather than burned, which will also bring socioeconomic benefits and
retain the ability to sequester carbon. The project has contracted with Fundacion Defensores de la
Naturaleza to manage the land including the road construction and maintenance, fire protection,
nature conservation, and harvest of tree removal.
Environmental priorities will be followed with the addition of non-polluting sources of
electricity, thus preserving the local and global air quality from avoiding emissions from fossil
fuel powered generation. Also, the increase in water storage from the reservoir is expected to
increase vegetation in the area. This project offers a step forward in the long-term strategy of
wise use of natural resources.
|
-
D. Environmental, social/cultural, and economic impacts of the AIJ project
|
Non-Greenhouse-Gas Environmental Impacts of the Project
|
|
As mentioned previously, the generation of electricity from renewable sources will improve local
air quality by avoiding emissions associated with fossil fuel-based sources of energy, such as CO,
VOCs, NOx, SO2, and particulate matter. The quantities of these emissions depend on the type, size,
and output of the thermoelectric plants, and the resultant effects on human health additionally
depend on geography and topography of the area. The fuel mix used as a reference case for the
displacement scenario is 43% bunker fuel, 44% diesel, and 13% coal.
Several hectares of land will be used during construction and to build the dam and reservoir. The
trees that will be removed as part of the initial construction process are considered secondary
growth—taking place in the last 15 years. There will be about 1000 trees removed and sold.
Many of the small trees were washed away by flooding caused by Hurricane Mitch, which has made the
ravine wider and steeper. The project proposes to replant the trees removed during the construction
process and the land will be managed under a forest management plan. Land use change-related
emissions and sequestration potential of the reforestation have not been counted as part of the
greenhouse gas emissions calculations.
During construction, a diversion tunnel will be constructed to continue the water flow of the
river. Water quality will be maintained after the Project is developed. The additional water
storage from the reservoir will provide a source for fire control in the area.
|
|
Social/Cultural Impacts of the Project
|
|
Jobs will be available to the local communities in the construction of the Project, and in the
management of the land reserve. Indirect jobs in the areas of transportation, fueling, food, and
housing will also be created. The development of access roads will provide additional avenues for
individuals in villages along the road to seek job opportunities outside of the community. Training
in fire prevention, safety issues, land conservation and management, and many other areas in the
land management and project construction will add skills and knowledge to the local population.
There will be no resettlement issues in conjunction with the project, because the reservoir area is
uninhabited.
|
|
Economic Impacts of the Project
|
|
This project fits into the national program for rural electrification developed by Guatemalan
energy and environmental policymakers.
|
-
E. Greenhouse gas impacts of the AIJ project
|
Item
|
Please Complete for Each Site
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
1
|
|
Site name/designation
|
Rio Hondo II
|
|
Project sector
|
energy
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
electricity generation
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
The reference scenario as determined by CONAMA Proyecto inventario de Gases de Efecto Invernadero
Sector Energia de Guatemala is Bunker fuel 43%, Diesel 44% coal 13%. Peak power by the
hydroelectric facility is expected to displace the fuel mix as above with 142,000 MWh of
electricity to the grid per year, based on a generating capacity of 50 MW.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Renewable electricity generation
|
|
Description:
Rio Hondo II will offer peak power generation capacity that is expected to displace power
generation from diesel, bunker fuels and coal.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
|
|
Description:
|
-
2. GHG emission/sequestration calculation methodology
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
1
|
|
Project sector
|
Energy
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
The Reference Scenario uses the displacement of existing/future generating facilities of the grid
as 43% bunker fuel, 44% diesel and 13% coal with the carbon intensity of each fuel type per
gigajoule as .0211, .0202, .0258, respectively. The displacement ratios are based on information
from CONAMA, the national environmental agency and OGIC. The carbon intensity is that listed in the
IPCC Second Assessment Report, Table 1-1.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
After calculating the avoided CO2 emissions using different assumptions about the fuel,
technological change, etc., we have chosen to submit the most conservative estimates for emission
reductions using the projected energy placed on the grid as 142,000 MWh and comparing that to the
reference scenario above. Electricity output generation displaced by the project is determined by
taking the annual Rio Hondo capacity multiplied by the generation displaced by Rio Hondo for each
fuel, according to the expected fuel mix to the grid. The fuel consumption displaced is calculated
by dividing the electricity output generation displaced by the project by the energy conservation
conversion, yielding a quantity in MWh that is multiplied by 3.6 to convert the result to
gigajoules. Multiplying the fuel consumption displaced for bunker, diesel and coal by the fuel
carbon intensity (tons/GJ) yields the quantity of carbon avoided. These amounts are multiplied by
3.664 to convert them to avoided CO2 emissions per year.
See table below.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
Rio Hondo II Estimate of Annual CO2 Emissions Avoided Electricity Generation -
Projected Energy Placed on Grid After Line Losses
|
Power Source
|
Thermal Efficiency, GJ/MWh
|
|
Fuel Carbon Intensity, tons C/GJ
|
(Alt.)
|
Rio Hondo II Capacity: 50 MW
|
|
Hydro
|
1
|
|
0
|
0
|
|
Bunker
|
0.3
|
|
0.0211
|
0.024
|
Annual Electricity Production: 1420,000 MWh
|
|
Diesel
|
0.25
|
|
0.0202
|
0.023
|
|
Coal
|
0.35
|
|
0.0258
|
0.025
|
|
Source: Steam, Babcock & Wilcox, 1979
|
Source: IPCC Second Assessment Report, Table 1-1
|
Source: Project Engineer Calculations
|
|
Generation Displaced by Rio Hondo, %
|
|
|
Electricity Output Displaced by Project, MWh per year
|
Fuel Consumption Displaced, GJ
|
|
Hydro
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
0
|
|
Bunker
|
43%
|
|
|
61060
|
732720
|
|
Diesel
|
44%
|
|
|
62480
|
899712
|
|
Coal
|
13%
|
|
|
18460
|
189874.3
|
|
Source: CONAMA
|
Total
|
142000
|
|
|
Avoided Carbon Emissions (tons/yr)
|
(Alt.)
|
|
Avoided CO2 Emissions (tons/yr)
|
(Alt.)
|
|
Hydro
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
Bunker
|
15460.4
|
17585.28
|
|
56646.88
|
64432.47
|
|
Diesel
|
18174.2
|
20693.38
|
|
66590.2
|
75820.53
|
|
Coal
|
4898.8
|
4746.857
|
|
17949.04
|
17392.48
|
|
Total
|
38533.3
|
43205.51
|
Total
|
141186 tons CO2/yr
|
157645.5 tons CO2/yr
|
-
3. GHG emission/sequestration data
(a) Reporting of GHG emissions/sequestration
-
(b) Additional information on GHG emissions/sequestration
|
Indirect or Secondary GHG Impacts (Positive and Negative)
|
|
Indirect greenhouse gas impacts will result from the change in land use by the project. Land will
be cleared for the building of the dam, to upgrade some access roads, and in the creation of the
reservoir. The majority of the trees that will be lost are less than 15 years old, "secondary
growth," and will be replanted in excess of the amount harvested. A fire and forest management
plan is being developed in cooperation with the Fundacion Defensores de la Naturaleza that will
result in additional protection. Land use change impacts have not been quantified, but will likely
result in net sequestration.
The construction project will emit greenhouse gases, in transportation and the cement used to build
the dam, which has been quantified and listed in the spreadsheet as the greenhouse gas emissions
for the first three years of the project.
|
|
Factors That Could Cause the Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
Future loss of GHG benefits could result from damage of the dam, or adverse weather conditions such
as (drought or hurricane) which would change the flow of the river and decrease the amount of
electricity that can be produced.
|
|
Strategy for Reducing the Risk of Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
The only viable strategy to reduce the risk of future loss of GHG benefits to a hydroelectric
project is to build and operate the dam to the highest standards to ensure full capacity operation.
|
CONFIDENTIAL
-
(a) Funding sources for project development
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount ($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding (%)
|
|
Enron, S.D. Rio Hondo S.A.
|
|
60,000
|
100
|
|
Total
|
|
60,000
|
100
|
-
(b) Funding sources for project implementation
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount ($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding (%)
|
Is This Funding Assured? (Y/N)
|
|
Debt financing and partner equity
|
US, Guatemala
|
$100 million
|
<100
|
N
|
|
InterAmerican Development Bank
|
|
|
x
|
N
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
|
-
2. Assessment of additional funding needs:
|
Current or Planned Activities to Obtain Additional Funding
|
|
We will likely seek some degree of financing from the InterAmerican Development Bank.
|
-
G. Contribution to capacity building and technology transfer
|
Contribution to Capacity Building and Technology Transfer
|
|
The JI component of the Project strengthens the commitment by all involved to the Project by
including domestic (Guatemalan) and U.S. review and understanding of the project. Host government
expert involvement contributes to capacity building for more AIJ activities and creates the
groundwork for future CDM projects. Policies and procedures to encourage AIJ projects are developed
and refined as real project proposals come into existence.
The experience of completing the AIJ application process also enhances the capacity of Enron to
develop more JI and CDM projects. As the project comes to fruition, the experience in monitoring
and verifying results will have positive spillover effects for all parties involved in other such
projects.
Capacity for land, fire, and forest management in the area surrounding Rio Hondo will also be
enhanced, paving the way for other such programs in the area with or without concomitant hydropower
projects.
|
-
H. Recent developments, technical difficulties, and obstacles encountered
|
Recent Project Developments
|
|
The project has become larger with a higher MW capacity than in the initial project application.
For a variety of reasons, the project has not progressed according to schedule. Construction is
expected to begin in 2001.
|
|
Technical Difficulties and Other Obstacles Encountered
|
|
-
I. Additional information
J. Annex
-
1. Host country acceptance of the AIJ project
|
Country/Project Title
|
Name, Title, and Government Agency of the Designated National Authority
|
Date of Approval (day/month/year)
|
|
Guatemala/Rio Hondo II Hydroelectric project
|
Oficina Guatemalteca De Implementacion Conjunta
Ministerio de Energia y Minas, Direccion General de Energia
|
25/06/99
25/06/99
|
|
Item
|
Please Complete If Applicable
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name
|
Jeffrey Keeler
|
|
Organization (English)
|
Enron Corp.
|
|
Telephone
|
202.466.9157
|
|
Fax
|
202.331.4717
|
|
E-mail
|
Jkeeler@enron.com
|
|
Milestone
|
Date Initiated (if applicable) (month/year)
|
Date Completed (if applicable) (month/year)
|
|
Substantive discussions regarding project
|
1995
|
|
|
Pre-feasibility study
|
|
|
|
Feasibility study
|
01/98
|
01/98
|
|
Project development (including construction and/or setting up on-site offices, purchase of lands,
etc.)
|
Ongoing
|
|
|
Project operations (including starting management practices, distributing information, training,
purchase of operating equipment, etc.)
|
01/2001
|
|
|
Sequestration or reduction of GHG emissions
|
06/2003
|
|
|
Project financing obtained
|
2001
|
|
|
Other (please specify)
|
|
|
-
3. Assignment of GHG emission reductions
-
(a) Methodology for allocating GHG emission reductions.
|
Methodology for Allocating GHG Emission Reductions
|
|
No voluntary agreements have been established to assign emission reductions from this project.
Project developers will negotiate with the Guatemalan partners and the Guatemalan government (OGIC)
to determine the assignment of emission reductions following pre-specified guidelines.
As the process moves from AIJ phase to CDM, appropriate assignment of emission reductions will be
established with all appropriate parties.
|
-
(b) Final assignment of GHG emission reductions
|
Participant
|
Percentage of the Total Emission Reduction Assigned to This Participant
|
|
Total
|
100
|
-
4. Baseline GHG emission scenario (prior 12 months)
|
Period
|
Baseline Emissions (metric tonnes)
|
|
From (month/year)
|
To (month/year)
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
Other (Specify)
|
CO2-Equivalent
|
|
Methodology for Calculating Baseline Emission/Sequestration Estimates
|
|
|