Your location: Home


ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY (AIJ)

List of Projects

Uniform Reporting Format:

Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase

A. Description of project

1) Title of project: District Heating project in Järvakandi

2) Participants/actors:

Item Financier/Reporter Co-reporter

Name of organisation(a):

Statens energimyndighet

Eesti Vabariigi Keskkonnaministeerium

Name of organisation (English):

Swedish National Energy Administration(*

Ministry of the Environment of the Republic of Estonia

Department:

Secretariat for Climate Policy and International Co-operation

International Relations Department

Acronym:

STEM

EKM

Acronym (English):

STEM

MoE

Function within activity:

Assigned by the Swedish Government for implementation including financing arrangements.

Estonian Climate responsible Organisation

Street:

Kungsgatan 43

Toompuiestee 24

Post code:

BOX 310, S-631 04

10149

City:

Eskilstuna

Tallinn

Country:

Sweden

Estonia

Telephone:

+46 16 544 20 00

+372 62 62 800

Fax:

+46 16 544 22 64

+372 62 62 801

E-mail:

klas.tennberg@stem.se

min@ekm.envir.ee

WWW-URL:

http://www.stem.se

http://www.envir.ee

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

-------------------------------------

Surname:

Knutsson

Kratovits

First name, middle name:

Gudrun

Andres

Job title:

Head of Section, Climate Investment Programme

Counsellor

Direct tel:

+46 16 544 20 72

+372 62 62 841

Direct fax:

+46 16 544 22 64

+372 62 62 845

Direct E-mail:

gudrun.knutsson@stem.se

andres@ekm.envir.ee

(* From 1 January, 1998, the new Swedish National Energy Administration has taken over the responsibility for the Programme for an Environmentally Adapted Energy System in the Baltic region and Eastern Europe (EAES Programme) from NUTEK (Swedish National Board for Industrial and Technical Development).

Borrower

Name of organisation(a):

Järvakandi vald

Name of organisation (English):

Järvakandi Municipality

Department:

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function within activity:

Borrower

Street:

Vana-Asula 1

Post code:

79101 Järvakandi

City:

Rapla county

Country:

ESTONIA

Telephone:

+372 48 776 32

Fax:

+372 48 774 32

E-mail:

jarv@jarvakandiov.ee

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

Surname:

Tõnu

First name, middle name:

Saar

Job title:

Head of the Municipality

Direct tel:

+372 48 776 32

Direct fax:

+372 48 774 32

Direct E-mail:

Item Please fill in if applicable Please fill in if applicable

Name of organization(a):

Sihtasutus Regionaalsed Energiakeskused

ÅF International

Name of organization (English):

Regional Energy Centres in Estonia

ÅF International

Department:

Võru office

AF - International

Malmö

Acronym:

SA REK

ÅFI

Acronym (English):

REC

AFI

Function within activity:

Local reporter

Technical support

Street:

Liiva 12C

Stensjögatan 3

Post code:

65602, Võru P.O., BOX 43

S-217 65

City:

Võru

MALMÖ

Country:

ESTONIA

SWEDEN

Telephone:

+372 78 282 30

+46-40-37 50 00

Fax:

+372 78 282 31

+46-40-13 03 69

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

http://www.af.se/ens/english/rec

http://www.af.se

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

------------------------------------

Surname:

Potter

Lindgren

First name, middle name:

Elmu

Ulf

Job title:

Consultant

project leader

Direct tel:

+372 78 282 30

+46-40-37 50 97

Direct fax:

+372 78 282 31

+46-40-13 03 69

Direct E-mail:

elmu@regen.werro.ee

Ulf.lindgren@mlm.pdn.af.se

a) Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

3) Activity:

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Järvakandi is a small county town with its 1800 inhabitants in Rapla county in north-west Estonia, some 80 km from Tallinn. Järvakandi is situated quite near to the heart of mainland Estonia. Järvakandi has been well-known for its glass industry. This industry has nowdays been reduced to a factory for producing glass package in different size. There is one gas fired boiler plant and 1 district heating network with a total length of about 3500 m. The domestic hot water was supplied to the consumers from boiler house by separate pipes (4-pipe district heating network). An investment project to increase energy efficiency in the system was started by STEM in October 1966.

Type of project:a)

energy efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region,

state):

Järvakandi village

Rapla County

Estonia

Activity starting date:

October 1996

In operation from:

October 1997

Expected activity ending date:

31. March 2006

Stage of activity:b)

Completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

Expected technical lifetime is 15 years which means that the plant is expected to be in operation till 2013.

Technical data:d)

The existing 4-pipe system has been replaced with a 2 pipe-system. 4-pipe system means that there are two water pipes for heating purposes and two pipes for domestic hot water, while the 2-pipe system provides both heating water domestic hot water in two pipes only. This is done by installation heat substations with heat exchangers for domestic hot water and also control equipment for the heating in the 13 houses. The project also contained installation of a frequency converter for DH circulation pump as well as modernisation of control equipment in the boiler house. Some of the pipeline in the network have been exchanged to preinsulated type ( 100 m DN100 and 24 m DN65 ).

The estimated energy saving: 1,6 GWh/year by installation new heat substations in the buildings and 0,53 GWh/year by conversion 4-pipe system to 2-pipe one in the network and buildings

a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.

b) Circle the appropriate option.

c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.

  1. Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data requirements are.

The lifetime criteria has been arranged in different groups depending on type of implemented activities. This classification assumes a level of operation and maintenance which is normal in western countries.

Lifetime of activity

Heat production plants (bio fuel)

25 years

New installation of all main equipment parts (fuel handling system, firing equipment and boiler) and modernisation of secondary equipment.

15 years

Conversion of existing boiler but new installation fuel handling system and firing equipment. Modernisation of secondary equipment.

10 years

Limited installation of new equipment (only one part of the three main parts, normally the firing equipment). Modernisation of other equipment.

Heat distribution systems and sub-stations

25 years

Pre-fabricated pipes and installations using certified contractors and supervisor according to EN norms and applicable district heating practise

15 years

Pre-fabricated pipes and installations without using certified contractors and supervisor

10 years

Modernisation of existing pipes.

Energy efficiency in buildings

25 years

Additional insulation roofs walls etc. with Scandinavian technology.

New installed heating systems.

15 years

Renovation and balancing of heating systems including thermostat valves.

10 years

Weather stripping windows, doors etc.

  • if a combination of measures is done a reasonable lifetime for the project have to be calculated.

4) Cost (to the extent possible):

To the investment costs are referred the cost of the investment proper and the accumulated interest during the grace period, generally 2 years.

The AIJ/JI cost items are the costs for:

  • Technical assistance, a technical and administrative support from consultants, during the period from definition of the project till commissioning. These costs are paid by STEM.
  • Follow-up, an annual technical and economic follow-up by consultants, hired by STEM, of the operating results of the plant with the objective to improve on its techno-economic sustainability and its climate effect. The cost indicated is an average cost per project.
  • Reporting costs – i e costs in connection with the annual reporting of the project’s climate effects to UNFCCC. The cost indicated is an average cost per project.
  • Administration –Costs for seminars, handbooks, education (capacity building) and average costs of STEM staff per project.
  • Difference in interest rates. STEM applies for its loans generally an interest rate corresponding to 6-month STIBOR (Stockholm InterBank Rate, in April 1999 3,0 %). Assuming a normal lending rate of 7 % means that this loan is associated with a cost of 4 % in relation to normal lending rate.

Investment/instalment = the borrower’s possible own financing of the investment, followed by the borrower’s repayment of the loan.

All costs in USD

Country

Järvakandi (DH)

1997 1998 1999
0 1 2

Investment

1. Loan/debt to STEM

99875 104500 89568

2. Added costs

0 4625 0

3.Technical assistance

43750 0 0

AIJ/JI

4. Follow up

0 2750 2834

A. Sweden

costs

5. Reporting costs

1064 0 930

6. Administration

58750 0 0

7. Difference in interest

4% 4180 3583

8.Accum. costs for AIJ/JI

103564 110494 117840

9.Total costs

203439 214994 207408

Investment

1. Investment/Instalment

0 0 14932

2. Estonia

AIJ/JI

2. Reporting costs

0 0 0

costs

3. Other costs

0 0 0

4. Accum. costs for AIJ/JI

0 0 0

5. Total costs

0 0 14932

1 USD=

8

SEK

5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:

Describe the procedures, including name of organisations involveda):

Ministry of the Environment of Estonia is a central Estonian authority responsible on reporting of JI projects. This authority assigns a local institution, which is involved in to the evaluation of the climate effects of this project and takes the main responsibility to continue measuring, results collecting for JI-reporting.

a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organisations mentioned is reported under section A.2 above.

B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement

Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance, approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be shown as follows:

(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached letters issued by the relevant national authorities;

(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been received from all participating Parties.

1) For the activity:

  • * Subsequent reports:

Third report. First report was submitted 1997.

2) This report is a joint report:

  • Yes, Agreement with designated national authority was signed 1997.

3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:

cf. Annex II, section B

C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio economic and environment priorities and strategies

Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national economic development and socio economic and environment priorities and strategies

The project meets the following objectives in the Estonian Energy Law, Estonian National Environmental Strategy, Estonian National Environmental Action Plan, Act on Sustainable Development and the Long-term Development Plan for the Estonian Fuel and Energy Sector:

- efficient and sustainable use of energy resources;

- to increase the share of renewable energy sources in the primary energy demand from present 8% to 13% to the year 2010;

- to reduce the environmental damage arising from fuel and energy production, transport, conversion and distribution;

- to create the reliable energy conservation system stimulating the implementation of energy conservation measures by consumers;

- creation and usage of energy efficient technologies, fuel/energy consuming and diagnostic equipment;

- stimulation of environmental awareness and environmentally friendly consumption patterns;

- to attract foreign investments for projects which ensure better use natural resources as well as environmental improvement;

- to develop co-operation between Baltic, Nordic and Central European countries

D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project

Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)

Item Please fill in

Describe environmental benefits in detail:

Annual emmisiuons reduction:

Projected: 1999

621 ton CO2 496 ton CO2

0 ton SO2 0 ton SO2

0,7 ton Nox 0,5 ton NOx

Minor decrease of local pollution

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?

No

Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:

More stable heat supply to customers

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?

No

Describe economic benefits in detail:

Decreased energy consumption

Energy use can now be billed based upon measured figures

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?

No

  1. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real, measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not have occurred in the absence of such activities

1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):

Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:

Present data reflect emission reductions using status quo (emissions in the period before the conversion to renewable fuel) for the baseline case. Calculations, according to the top-down method, for emissions from different types of projects in the baseline case are being made. The changed calculation method will result in a change in emission reduction.

The new data will be introduced as soon as available.

2) Estimated emissions with the activity:

Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:

Emission reductions are calculated using the IPCC Guidelines, using the Carbon Emission Factor (CEF) for different types of fuel, using actual system efficiency. For boiler conversion, the decrease in emissions is calculated in relation to the amount of fossil fuel replaced (status quo).

For an energy efficiency project the decrease in emissions reflects the amount of fuel that is saved through the project. In the case that the system uses renewable fuels, the reduction is calculated comparing the amount of fossil fuels that was used before the conversion to renewable fuels.

Below comparison is based upon that the base-line scenario represents a status quo solution.

Fill in the following tables as applicable:

Summary table: Projected emission reductions:

GHG

Year 1

=1997

Year 2

=1998

Year 3

=1999

...

Year 16

=2012

Planned energy saving from installation substations, MWh/year

520

1600

1600

1600

Planned energy saving from network rehabilitation, MWh/year

210

530

530

530

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

211

621

621

621

CH4

-

-

N2O

-

-

other

-

-

B) Project activity scenarioa)

CO2

0

0

0

0

CH4

-

-

N2O

-

-

other

-

-

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

-211

-621

-621

-621

CH4

-

-

N2O

-

-

Other

-

-

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

-211

-831

-1452

-9524

CH4

-

-

N2O

-

-

Other

-

-

  1. Includes indirect GHG leakages.

Summary table: Actual emission reductions:

GHG

Year 1

= 1997

Year 2

= 1998

Year 3

=1999

...

Year 16

=2012

Factual energy saving from installation substations, MWh/year

343

687

787

787

Factual energy saving from network rehabilitation, MWh/year

210

890

1079

1079

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

155

421

496

496

CH4

-

-

-

N2O

-

-

-

other

-

-

-

B) Project activity scenarioa)

CO2

0

0

0

0

CH4

-

-

-