Your location: Home


ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY (AIJ)

List of Projects

Uniform Reporting Format:

Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase

Annex I

A. Description of project

1) Title of project: Energy efficiency project in Keila schools

2) Participants/actors:

Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item Function within activity".

Item Financier/Reporter Co-reporter

Name of organisation(a):

Statens energimyndighet

Eesti Vabariigi Keskkonnaministeerium

Name of organisation (English):

Swedish National Energy Administration(*

Ministry of the Environment of the Republic of Estonia

Department:

Secretariat for Climate Policy and International Co-operation

International Relations Department

Acronym:

STEM

EKM

Acronym (English):

STEM

MoE

Function within activity:

Assigned by the Swedish Government for implementation including financing arrangements

Estonian Climate responsible Organisation

Street:

Kungsgatan 43

Toompuiestee 24

Post code:

BOX 310, S-631 04

10149

City:

Eskilstuna

Tallinn

Country:

Sweden

Estonia

Telephone:

+46 16 544 20 00

+372 62 62 800

Fax:

+46 16 544 22 64

+372 62 62 801

E-mail:

klas.tennberg@stem.se

min@ekm.envir.ee

WWW-URL:

http://www.stem.se

http://www.envir.ee

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

-------------------------------------

Surname:

Knutsson

Kratovits

First name, middle name:

Gudrun

Andres

Job title:

Head of Section, Climate Investment Programme

Counsellor

Direct tel:

+46 16 544 20 72

+372 62 62 841

Direct fax:

+46 16 544 22 64

+372 62 62 845

Direct E-mail:

gudrun.knutsson@stem.se

andres@ekm.envir.ee

(* From 1 January, 1998, the new Swedish National Energy Administration has taken over the responsibility for the Programme for an Environmentally Adapted Energy System in the Baltic region and Eastern Europe (EAES Programme) from NUTEK (Swedish National Board for Industrial and Technical Development).

Item Borrower

Name of organisation(a):

Keila Linnavalitsus

Name of organisation (English):

Keila Town Government

Department:

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function within activity:

Borrower

Street:

Keskväljak 11

Post code:

76607

City:

Keila

Country:

ESTONIA

Telephone:

+372 6790 700

Fax:

+372 6780 303

E-mail:

lv@keila.ee

WWW-URL:

http://enigma.keila.ee

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

Surname:

Mägi

First name, middle name:

Leino

Job title:

Mayor

Direct tel:

+372 6790 700

Direct fax:

+372 6780 303

Direct E-mail:

Item Please fill in if applicable Please fill in if applicable

Name of organisation(a):

Sihtasutus Regionaalsed Energiakeskused

ÅF International

Name of organisation (English):

Regional Energy Centres in Estonia

ÅF International

Department:

Võru office

AF - International

Malmö

Acronym:

SA REK

ÅFI

Acronym (English):

REC

AFI

Function within activity:

Local reporter

Technical support

Street:

Liiva 12C

Stensjögatan 3

Post code:

65602, Võru P.O., BOX 43

S-217 65

City:

Võru

MALMÖ

Country:

ESTONIA

SWEDEN

Telephone:

+372 78 282 30

+46-40-37 50 00

Fax:

+372 78 282 31

+46-40-13 03 69

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

http://www.af.se/ens/english/rec

http://www.af.se

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

------------------------------------

Surname:

Potter

Lindgren

First name, middle name:

Elmu

Ulf

Job title:

Consultant

project leader

Direct tel:

+372 78 282 30

+46-40-37 50 97

Direct fax:

+372 78 282 31

+46-40-13 03 69

Direct E-mail:

elmu@regen.werro.ee

Ulf.lindgren@mlm.pdn.af.se

  1. Organisation includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organisations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

3) Activity:

Item Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Keila is a small town with 9500 inhabitants in North Estonia ,about 25 km SW of Tallinn. The town is traversed by roads and railroad to Paldiski and to West-Estonia. Keila is also the centre for a major part of Western-Harjumaa. In Keila there are 4 schools with 2115 pupils in total. From the origin proposal to renovate three schools in Keila the decision was to create only two of them as Primary School and Russian Gymnasium with 1010 pupils. These two school buildings were built together in the 1970`s and the total heated area is 5430 m2 .The buildings have two-pipe heating systems connected to district heating. No regulation of incoming heat and local heat demand and hot water inside the buildings. Ventilation consists of natural draught. The main problems in the school buildings before renovation work were bad indoor climate especially in the classrooms (not fresh air), uneven indoor temperature and too high heat consumption in relation to the indoor temperature.

Type of project:a)

energy efficiency

Location (exact, e.g. city, region,

state):

Keila Town

Harju County

Estonia

Activity starting date:

02. December 1998 (Loan agreement)

In operation from:

March 1999

Expected activity ending date:

30.September 2008

Stage of activity:b)

Completed

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

Expected technical lifetime is 15 years which means that the installations is expected to be in operation till 2014.

Technical data:d)

The measures undertaken consisted of renovation and insulation of the roof and attic, installation partly new windows with decreasing partly the area of windows (about 200 m2), new heat substation including heat exchangers, expansion tanks, balancing the heating system, installation of thermostatic valves on the radiators and cleaning the existing natural ventilation canals from dirtiness and other things. Also new entrance doors of Russian Gymnasium are included

Calculated energy savings: 190 MWh/year

a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.

b) Circle the appropriate option.

c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.

d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data requirements are.

The life time criteria has been arranged in different groups depending on type of implemented activities. This classification assumes a level of operation and maintenance which is normal

in western countries.

Lifetime of activity

Heat production plants (bio fuel)

25 years

New installation of all main equipment parts (fuel handling system, firing equipment and boiler) and modernisation of secondary equipment.

15 years

Conversion of existing boiler but new installation fuel handling system and firing equipment. Modernisation of secondary equipment.

10 years

Limited installation of new equipment (only one part of the three main parts, normally the firing equipment). Modernisation of other equipment.

Heat distribution systems and sub-stations

25 years

Pre-fabricated pipes and installations using certified contractors and supervisor according to EN norms and applicable district heating practise

15 years

Pre-fabricated pipes and installations without using certified contractors and supervisor

10 years

Modernisation of existing pipes.

Energy efficiency in buildings

25 years

Additional insulation roofs walls etc. with Scandinavian technology.

New installed heating systems.

15 years

Renovation and balancing of heating systems including thermostat valves.

10 years

Weather stripping windows, doors etc.

  • if a combination of measures is done a reasonable lifetime for the project have to be calculated.

4) Cost (to the extent possible):

To the investment costs are referred the cost of the investment proper and the accumulated interest during the grace period, generally 2 years.

The AIJ/JI cost items are the costs for:

  • Technical assistance, a technical and administrative support from consultants, during the period from definition of the project till commissioning. These costs are paid by STEM.
  • Follow-up, an annual technical and economic follow-up by consultants, hired by STEM, of the operating results of the plant with the objective to improve on its techno-economic sustainability and its climate effect. The cost indicated is an average cost per project.
  • Administration –Costs for seminars, handbooks, education (capacity building) and average costs of STEM staff per project.
  • Difference in interest rates. STEM applies for its loans generally an interest rate corresponding to 6-month STIBOR (Stockholm InterBank Rate, in April 1999 3,0 %). Assuming a normal lending rate of 7 % means that this loan is associated with a cost of 4 % in relation to normal lending rate.

Investment/instalment = the borrower’s possible own financing of the investment, followed by the borrower’s repayment of the loan.

All costs in USD

Country

Keila EE

1998 1999
0 1

Investment

1. Loan/debt to STEM

162500 167679

2. Added costs

5179 0

3.Technical assistance

22865 0

AIJ/JI

4. Follow up

0 2834

A. Sweden

costs

5. Reporting costs

0 930

6. Administration

0 0

7. Difference in interest

4% 6707

8.Accum. costs for AIJ/JI

22865 33336

9.Total costs

190544 201015

Investment

1. Investment/Instalment

0 0

2. Estonia

AIJ/JI

2. Reporting costs

0 0

costs

3. Other costs

0 0

4. Accum. costs for AIJ/JI

0 0

5. Total costs

0 0

1 USD=

8

SEK

5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:

Describe the procedures, including name of organisations involveda):

Ministry of the Environment of Estonia is a central Estonian authority responsible on reporting of JI projects. This authority assigns a local institution, which is involved in to the evaluation of the climate effects of this project and takes the main responsibility to continue measuring, results collecting for JI-reporting.

a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organisations mentioned is reported under

section A.2 above.

B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement

Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance, approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be shown as follows:

(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached letters issued by the relevant national authorities;

  1. In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been received from all participating Parties.

1) For the activity:

  • * Subsequent reports:

First report

2) This report is a joint report:

Yes

  1. General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:

cf. Annex II, section B

C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio economic and environment priorities and strategies

Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national economic development and socio economic and environment priorities and strategies

The project meets the following objectives in the Estonian Energy Law, Estonian National Environmental Strategy, Estonian National Environmental Action Plan, Act on Sustainable Development and the Long-term Development Plan for the Estonian Fuel and Energy Sector:

- efficient and sustainable use of energy resources;

- to increase the share of renewable energy sources in the primary energy demand from present 8% to 13% to the year 2010;

- to reduce the environmental damage arising from fuel and energy production, transport, conversion and distribution;

- to create the reliable energy conservation system stimulating the implementation of energy conservation measures by consumers;

- creation and usage of energy efficient technologies, fuel/energy consuming and diagnostic equipment;

- stimulation of environmental awareness and environmentally friendly consumption patterns;

- to attract foreign investments for projects which ensure better use natural resources as well as environmental improvement;

- to develop co-operation between Baltic, Nordic and Central European countries

D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project

Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)

Item Please fill in

Describe environmental benefits in detail:

Annual emission reduction:

1999

42 ton CO2

0,7 ton SO2

0,1ton NOx

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?

No

Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:

Much better comfort thanks to a 2-30C higher inside temperature.

More stable heat distribution over the rooms

Healthy environment for pupils

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?

No

Describe economic benefits in detail:

Decreased energy consumption some 15 % and lower heat energy bills

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?

No

E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real, measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not have occurred in the absence of such activities

1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):

Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:

Present data reflect emission reductions using status quo (emissions in the period before the conversion to renewable fuel) for the baseline case. Calculations, according to the top-down method, for emissions from different types of projects in the baseline case are being made. The changed calculation method will result in a change in emission reduction.

The new data will be introduced as soon as available.

2) Estimated emissions with the activity:

Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:

Emission reductions are calculated using the IPCC Guidelines, using the Carbon Emission Factor (CEF) for different types of fuel, using actual system efficiency. For boiler conversion, the decrease in emissions is calculated in relation to the amount of fossil fuel replaced (status quo).

For an energy efficiency project the decrease in emissions reflects the amount of fuel that is saved through the project. In the case that the system uses renewable fuels, the reduction is calculated comparing the amount of fossil fuels that was used before the conversion to renewable fuels.

Below comparison is based upon that the base-line scenario represents a status quo solution.

Fill in the following tables as applicable:

Summary table: Projected emission reductions:

GHG

Year 1

=1999

Year 2

=2000

Year 3

=2001

...

Year 15

=2013

Planned energy savings MWh/year:

90

190

190

190

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

42

88

88

88

CH4

-

-

-

-

N2O

-

-

-

-

other

-

-

-

-

B) Project activity scenarioa)

CO2

0

0

0

0

CH4

-

-

-

-

N2O

-

-

-

-

other

-

-

-

-

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

-42

- 88

-88

-88

CH4

-

-

-

-

N2O

-

-

-

-

Other

-

-

-

-

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

-42

- 130

-218

-1277

CH4

-

-

-

-

N2O

-

-

-

-

Other

-

-

-

-

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

Summary table: Actual emission reductions:

GHG

Year 1

= 1999

Year 2

=2000

Year 3

=2001

...

Year 15

=2013

Factual energy savings MWh/year

90

90

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

42

42

CH4

-

-

-

-

N2O

-

-

-

-

other

-

-

-

-

B) Project activity scenarioa)

CO2

0

0

0

0

CH4

-

-

-

-

N2O

-

-

-

-

other

-

-

-

-

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

-42

-42

CH4

-

-

-

-

N2O

-

-

-

-

Other

-

-

-

-

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

-42

-627

CH4

-

-

-

-

N2O

-

-

-

-

Other

-

-

-

-

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

F. Additionality to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows

Please indicate all sources of project funding.

Category of funding

(For each source one line)

Amount

(US dollars)

Loan from NUTEK

162.500

Grant from NUTEK for technical assistance

22.865

1 USD = 8,00 SEK

G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties

Transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how Describe briefly

Schematically, the transfer of knowledge involves the following activities over time:

i) Technology transfer through NUTEK/STEM technical specialist during the implementation of the project.

ii) Technology transfer through co-operation between foreign supplier and local partner

iii) Conferences, seminars, documentation and training.

iv) Stimulate "net-working" for the exchange of experience between plant owners with similar problems, e g "bio-clubs"

Technology transfer has taken place through:

  1. STEM technical specialist support to the local project leader and municipality;

Knowledge in negotiations to foreign companies;

Knowledge in managing and planning of projects;

Transferring of environmental issues to the local parties;

Transferring of knowledge in operation and maintenance issue.

  1. Personal involved in the project has been invited to different seminars and work-shops and, documentation for training has been handed over.

There were arranged seminars through close cooperation between STEM and Estonian partners:

  • Environmentally Friendly Energy Systems in the Baltic Region and Eastern Europe - seminar in Tallinn , 14-15 April, 1994;
  • Environmentally Friendly Energy Systems in the Baltic Region and Eastern Europe - seminar and workshops in Tartu , 25 November, 1994 (prepared information by topics in Estonian over than 150 pages);
  • EAES Programme District Heating Day in Vändra, 27 July, 1995;
  • Environmentally Adapted Local Energy Systems - seminar and presentation of translated into Estonian booklet "Environmentally Adapted Local Energy Planning" in Rakvere, 11 November, 1998 and in Tartu, 12 November, 1998;
  • Energy efficiency projects in Mustamäe residential buildings - seminar in Tallinn, 16 September, 1996.

iv)Activities have been supported by STEM to stimulate cooperation with local experts, consultants, project owners to achieve two-way communication and to find respect for chosen solutions from both sides.

The projects have been visited by specialists of other areas (incl. From Russia, Baltic Countries) to exchange of experience.

Endogenous capacity supported or enhanced:

Endogenous capacity

(Name of organisation1)

Development (DEV) /

enhancement (ENH)

Describe briefly

Keila Town Government

(DEV)

The municipality specialists have got experience how to implement energy efficiency projects in schools and knowledge to extend school building renovation.

1) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organisations listed is reported under section A.2 above.

H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties, effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered

Fill in as appropriate:

1) Any practical experience gained:

The main body interested in implementation of energy efficiency improvement measures and energy saving is local municipality not schools personal. Motivating everybody in the schools to save energy is therefore important, although a long term task.

The heat substations maintenance is carried out by local heating company.

2) Technical difficulties:

Some thermostatic valves are damaged by pupils and must be changed.

3) Effects encountered:

4) Impacts encountered:

Better indoor comfort in the classrooms and improved heat demand regulation.

5) Other obstacles encountered:

Overcoming of psychological obstacles to change schools personal mind to start implementation of energy management. The heat meter reading are registered by heating company personal and there are not any data about heat consumption in the school.

6) Other:

Calculations of the volume of emissions of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide in the section D are calculated according to the Regulation No. 33 of 17. March 1999 of the Ministry of the Environment "The procedure and methods of determination of the volume of pollutants from combustion plants to the air".