NEGOTIATIONS
FOCUS
PROCESS
KEY STEPS
|
|
Your location: Home |
|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY (AIJ)
|
Uniform Reporting Format:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
List of
Projects
A. Description of project
-
Title of project:
The Model Project for Utilization of Waste Heat from Incineration of Refuse in Harbin of China
2) Participants/actors:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization
|
|
Department:
|
International Cooperation Center
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
NEDO
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Governmental Organization of Japan side in charge of project evaluation, negotiation and approval
as well as implementation of national AIJ program
|
|
Street:
|
1-1, 3-chome Higashi-Ikebukuro, Toshima-ku
|
|
Post code:
|
170-6028
|
|
City:
|
Tokyo
|
|
Country:
|
Japan
|
|
Telephone:
|
81-3-3987-9313
|
|
Fax:
|
81-3-5992-2290
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.nedo.go.jp
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Kigasawa
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Takaji
|
|
Job title:
|
Director
|
|
Direct tel.:
|
81-3-3987-9466
|
|
Direct fax:
|
81-3-3987-5103
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
kigasawatkj@nedo.go.jp
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Ebara Corporation
|
|
Department:
|
Environmental Plant Division
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
EBARA
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Entrusted by NEDO to execute Japanese scope of this AIJ project in cooperation with Chinese
counterpart.
|
|
Street:
|
1-6-27, Kohnan, Minato-ku
|
|
Post code:
|
108-8480
|
|
City:
|
Tokyo
|
|
Country:
|
Japan
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Konuma
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Hozumi
|
|
Job title:
|
Deputy General Manger
|
|
Direct tel.:
|
81-3-5461-6201
|
|
Direct fax:
|
81-3-5461-6082
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
konuma@shi.ebara.co.jp
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
The Ministry of Science and Technology, People’s Republic of China
|
|
Department:
|
Department of Social Development
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
MOST
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Governmental Authority of China side in charge of project evaluation, negotiation and approval as
well as implementation of national AIJ program
|
|
Street:
|
15B Fuxing Road
|
|
Post code:
|
100862
|
|
City:
|
Beijing
|
|
Country:
|
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Lu
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Xuedu
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel:
|
86 10 68514054
|
|
Direct fax:
|
86 10 68512163
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Lv Xuedu
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
The State Development Planning Commission
People’s Republic of China
|
|
Department:
|
Department of Raw and Processed Materials Industries and Resources Utilization
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
SDPC
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Governmental Authority of China side in charge of national development plan and national project
evaluation and domestic approval for project financing and construction.
|
|
Street:
|
38 South Yuetan Street,
|
|
Post code:
|
100824
|
|
City:
|
Beijing
|
|
Country:
|
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel.:
|
|
|
Direct fax:
|
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Planning Committee of Heilongjiang Province, People’s Republic of China
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
PCHLJ
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Provincial Governmental Authority of Heilongjiang Province of China side in charge of provincial
development plan and provincial project evaluation and domestic approval for project financing and
construction.
|
|
Street:
|
202 Zongshan Road
|
|
Post code:
|
150001
|
|
City:
|
Harbin
|
|
Country:
|
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Zhang
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Jian Ping
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel.:
|
86-451-2631676
|
|
Direct fax:
|
86-451-2628547
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Planning Committee Harbin Municipal People’s Government
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
PCH
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Municipal governmental authority of Harbin in charge of the development plan and project evaluation
and domestic approval for project financing and construction at the city level.
|
|
Street:
|
Daoli District
|
|
Post code:
|
150010
|
|
City:
|
Harbin
|
|
Country:
|
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Tian
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Ru
|
|
Job title:
|
Director
|
|
Direct tel.:
|
86-461-4411-562
|
|
Direct fax:
|
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Harbin Municipal Waste Incineration Plant
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
HMWIP
|
|
Function within activity:
|
The owner and executive entity of the project.
|
|
Street:
|
No.1 NanKan St. Daowai District,
|
|
Post code:
|
150020
|
|
City:
|
Harbin
|
|
Country:
|
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Lu
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Ze Min
|
|
Job title:
|
Vice Bureau Chief
|
|
Direct tel.:
|
86-451-3645902, 86-451-8380158 (Li Guolin)
|
|
Direct fax:
|
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization:
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Tsinghua University
|
|
Department:
|
Institute for Techno-Economics & Energy Systems Analysis / Institute of Nuclear Energy
Technology
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
ITEESA/INET
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Entrusted by MOST to execute Chinese scope of this AIJ project in cooperation with Japanese
counterpart. See A. 5) in detail.
|
|
Street:
|
Tsinghua Yuan Street, Haidian District
|
|
Post code:
|
100084
|
|
City:
|
Beijing
|
|
Country:
|
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Telephone:
|
86-10-62772596 or 86-10-62772752
|
|
Fax:
|
86-10-6277-1150
|
|
E-mail:
|
Liuds@tsinghua.edu.cn
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.inet.tsinghua.edu.cn
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Liu
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Deshun
|
|
Job title:
|
Professor, Deputy Director, Global Climate Change Institute (GCCI), Tsinghua University
|
|
Direct tel.:
|
86-10-62772752
|
|
Direct fax:
|
86-10-62771150
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Liuds@tsinghua.edu.cn
|
a) Organization includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organizations,
etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government
agency closely following the activity.
3) Activity:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description :
|
The objective of the Project is to contribute to the utilization of waste energy and consequently
to protect the local environment in Harbin, P. R. China as well as the reduction of CH4
emission, by installing a municipal waste incineration and heat recovery facility for heating
utilization in Harbin textile printing & dyeing Mill and disseminating the technology in P. R.
China.
|
|
Type of project :
|
Waste disposal
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region,
State):
|
Harbin Municipal Waste Incineration Plant, No.1 NanKan St. Daowai District, Harbin, 150020,
The People’s Republic of China
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
September, 2002, when AIJ project put into operation
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
September, 2022, when operation lifetime is due.
|
|
Stage of activity:
|
Under construction
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:
|
20 years, (* Suppose static baseline, so the lifetime of AIJ activity is set as project operation
lifetime)
|
|
Technical data:
|
Annual amount of municipal waste for incineration in the project: 57,646 t/a
The steam supply capacity of the project: 16.0~19.5t/h
The pressure of steam: 23kg/cm2
The temperature of steam: 270 ° C
|
4) Cost (to the extent possible): 1US$=120 Japanese Yen; 1US$=8.27Chinese RMB;
Base year :1999
|
Item
|
|
1998
|
1999
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
Total
|
|
Cost of the project in US1000$a)
|
Japan
|
492
|
2,033
|
8,283
|
4,450
|
142
|
15,400
|
|
China
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of AIJ component in US1000$b)
|
Japan
|
231
|
1000
|
5763
|
2680
|
|
9,674
|
|
China
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,894
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,568
|
|
US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent c) (T- CO2)
|
45.59 d) or (31.14) e)
(Including running cost)
|
- Costs of the project are provided by Japanese side, including cost of project design and other
transaction cost.
- Cost of AIJ component refers to costs of the hardware including all equipment and facilities provided
by Japan side, which were evaluated jointly by experts on both sides.
- It is defined here as life cycle yearly averaged incremental cost for CO2 emission reduction
against the given baseline.
-
Case 1: CO2 emission from the degradable organic carbon (DOC) combustion, that is
not degraded in the municipal waste landfill, is taken into account. It will result in less GHG
emission reduction and higher avoided cost.
-
Case 2: It is opposite to the Case 1. Such CO2 emission is not taken into account for the
reason that the net emission from biomass combustion is zero according to IPCC Guideline in 1996.
Similarly, CO2 emission from those biomass related municipal waste incineration that
originally form CH4 in the landfill in the baseline case, is also not taken into account.
The results based on carbon balance calculation in this case 2 are shown in the parentheses in the
report.
5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involved :
|
|
Basic Agreement concerning the execution of this project was concluded between NEDO and SDPC and
PCHLJ on September 3, 1998.
NEDO entrusted EBARA to execute this project on Japanese side on December 4, 1998.
EBARA and PCH concluded the Execution Document (ED) that described the concrete specification of
this project on March 12, 1999 and started the design and engineering work.
As determined in ED, HMWIP shall have responsibility to record and provide technical and economic
data. These data will be necessary for calculation of the GHG emission level both for baseline and
the AIJ project and for the emission reduction cost, as well as for the subsequent reporting
period.
HMWIP and EBARA shall submit the report on the data listed as above to MOST and NEDO before and
after completion of the test run for review.
Based on the data available, ITEESA, Tsinghua University shall make feasibility study on the
eligibility of the AIJ project and on assessment of the environmental benefits relating to the GHG
emission reduction, as well as on the methodological issues in close co-operation with HMWIP and
EBARAs’experts, with a view of preparing study report and draft report in uniform
reporting format, to be submitted to both governments.
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations mentioned is reported
under section A.2 above.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance,
approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be
shown as follows:
a. In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one
participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached
letters issued by the relevant national authorities;
b. In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national
authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been
received from all participating Parties.
For the activity:
* This report is the first report covering the activities at AIJ project feasibility study and AIJ project
design stage, and copies of letters of endorsement by each designated national authority of Parties are
attached.
Describe:
|
MOST and NEDO signed the "Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation in The Model Project
for Utilization of Waste Heat from Incineration of Refuse in Harbin of China as an AIJ Project
under the Pilot Phase" on September 25, 1998.
The Ministry of International Trade and Industry of Japan (MITI) approved this project as Activity
Implemented Jointly - Japan Program on June 17, 1998.
The Japanese government confirmed this project as Activity Implemented Jointly (AIJ) under pilot
phase on June 23,1999.
MOST authorized by Chinese government, confirmed this project as Activity Implemented Jointly (AIJ)
under pilot phase on July 9,1999.
|
-
2) This report is a joint report:
- Yes, forward copy of agreement/endorsement by the designated national authorities involved
-
No, this is a separate report. The reports are submitted separately by the designated
national authority of each and every participating party.
|
3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
This is the first project report. The system boundary design and technical basic data were preliminary
checked among the Chinese and Japanese experts. The environmental benefits and methodological and technical
issues were addressed on the project specific basis. On the other hand, due to
insufficient data availability and lack of uniformed methodology
guidelines the results reported here may be subject to modification. Hopefully with the further
progress of the project activities, more monitoring information on emissions and experiences in
methodologies will be built up, and therefore the subsequent reports could be updated later on.
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio-economic and
environment priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national
economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies
|
|
As energy supply and demand issues and protection of the global environment have become the focus
of worldwide interest, NEDO is promoting energy conservation model projects in Asian countries
including China to contribute to the effective use of energy and improvement of environment.
In China, strong national policies, laws and regulations for energy conservation and environmental
protection have come into effect. The urban waste disposal and its compre-hensive utilization have
been listed as one of the focused issues for environment protection and social development in urban
planning in China.
As an AIJ pilot project between Japan and China, this project will contribute to efficient use of
energy and consequent protection of the local environment in China as well as CH4 and
CO2 emission mitigation by adopting advanced technology and equipment provided by Japan
in the Harbin Municipal Waste Incineration Plant. Therefore the AIJ activity is compatible with and
supportive of national socio-economic environment priorities and strategies.
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
CH4 emission generated from the municipal waste that would have been disposed in the
landfill, otherwise, will be reduced.
Emissions of pollutants, such as SOx, NOx, soot and smoke that would have
accrued from coal fired steam boiler, otherwise, will be avoided, due to the related coal fuel
consumption for the steam supply will be replaced by those generated from the municipal waste
incinera-tion.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
Yes. Total annual GHG emission reduced is estimated as 42,959.8 (62,895.8) ton -CO2
equivalent in which CH4 emission reduction is 2,164.5 ton - CH4 annually,
CO2 emission reduction is –2,494.6 (17,441.1) ton -CO2 annually.
|
|
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:
|
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?
|
No.
|
|
Describe economic benefits in detail:
|
Cost of coal consumption for steam generation will be reduced. Cost of urban waste landfill
facilities will be reduced.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?
|
Yes.
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real,
measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not
have occurred in the absence of such activities
1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
|
Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:
|
System Boundary:
This AIJ project is a waste disposal project. So the baseline case is the municipal waste landfill
in Harbin city in absence of the AIJ project. According to the project specific baseline approach,
the system boundary design for the AIJ project will be illustrated as in the Figure 1.
The direct emission levels from major process activities both in baseline case and the AIJ project
are covered within the system boundary.
|
|
Fig.1 System boundary* of the municipal waste incineration
AIJ project and its baseline case
*: Due to limited capacity of the FBC incineration boiler which can not replace the whole
existing industrial boiler, but part of its capacity as shown in the system boundary diagram. While
the remaining capacity of the existing boiler is still in operation both in baseline and AIJ
project cases, and therefore is not shown in the diagram.
|
|
(Baseline)
The baseline of the AIJ project could be defined as below.
1. The municipal waste in Harbin city is not incinerated, but collected and put into landfill where
large amount of methane (CH4) emission are accrued.
|
|
2. Meanwhile at the existing Harbin Textile Printing and Dyeing Works, where the Municipal Waste
Incineration Plant will be located, the steam for heating and part of electricity demanded are
generated by the existing coal fired CHP boiler in the plant which accrues CO2 emission.
3. The CO2 emission from the biomass in the municipal waste landfill is not taken into
account, based on the IPCC methodology by which CO2 emission from biomass is recyclable
and is regarded as zero emission. See Box 1 in detail.
In the AIJ project case, the Municipal Waste Incineration Plant will be built to recover the heat
from the municipal waste incineration, and the recovered heat will replace part of process heat
generated from the existing boiler. In this way, CH4 emission that would have accrued
from the landfill, could be avoided and also CO2 emission that would have accrued from
the existing coal fired boiler, could be reduced.
|
|
(Calculation)
1. The amount of CH4 emission from the municipal waste landfill EBCH4
EBCH4 = G ×f1 × f2 × f3 × 16/12 = 2,164.5 t-CH4/a,
where
G =Amount of municipal waste to be incinerated by the AIJ project annually: 57,646 t-waste/a
f1 = the content of organic carbon in the municipal waste: 0.1788
f2 = ratio on gasification of organic carbon in landfill : 0.63
f3 = fraction of C as CH4 to C as bio-gas : 0.25
2. CO2 emission from the existing boilers (EBCO2)
E BCO2 = WB1 × C1 × Bf1 × 44/12 =
95,642.8 t-CO2/a, where
WB1= coal consumption in the existing boilers , which is estimated as average coal
consumption of the boiler over the latest three years :
WB1= (69,000 t/a + 61,000 t/a + 58,000 t/a) / 3 = 62,666.7 t/a
C1 = the carbon content of the local coal (from Hegang coal mine) : 48.4 %
Bf1= the burning efficiency of the existing boiler : 86 %
|
|
(Results)
By the calculation above, CH4 and CO2 emissions in baseline case are:
(1) CH4 emission
EBCH4 = 2,164.5 t-CH4/a
(2) CO2 emission
E BCO2 = 95,642.8 t-CO2/a
|
2) Estimated emissions with the activity(AIJ Project Case):
Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:
|
|
(Concept)
Although IPCC Guideline suggests that CO2 emission caused by combusting biomass raw
material should not be considered into net man-made CO2 emission, both Japanese and
Chinese experts participating in the AIJ project agreed to keep two kinds of calculations at same
time. One kind of calculations is made by following the IPCC guideline, and the
CO2 emitted from the incineration of MSW is not taken into the net GHGs emission accrued
from AIJ project.
The second kind is made according to the actual GHGs emission in the baseline and AIJ project,
which is not following the IPCC guideline. The carbon balance is shown in Figure 2.
The DOC(Degradable Organic Carbon) in the MSW can be divided into three parts, one part is
not degraded in landfill, the second part is degraded and converted into CH4 emission
and the third part is also degraded and converted into CO2 emission. When the AIJ
project is implemented, all DOC is incinerated and converted into CO2 emission.
Chinese side experts think it is more reasonable to estimate the emission according to the second
kind methodology.
|
|
Seven parts GHG emission from AIJ project are included:
- CH4 emission from the municipal waste in the landfill will be avoided by
incinerating the municipal waste in the FBC boiler.
- CO2 emission from the existing coal fired boilers: The CO2 emission from
existing coal fired boilers in the textile printing & dyeing works will be reduced, due to some
coal substitution by municipal waste incineration for process heat.
- CO2 emission from additional electricity consumption necessary for operation of the
municipal waste incineration: In the operation of the municipal waste incineration process
additional electricity are demanded from power grid, that will make the net CO2 emission
reduction smaller.
- CO2 emission from by incinerating man-made sources (plastics and chemical fabrics)
in the municipal waste: during the waste incineration, some man-made origins, such as plastics and
chemical fabrics, will also bring about CO2 emission that will make the net
CO2 emission reduction smaller again.
- CO2 emission by combusting coal as auxiliary fuel at the municipal waste
incineration plant in Summer season: Coal as auxiliary fuel will still be used during the Summer
season, when the calorific value contained in the waste for incineration is not high enough to
provide sufficient heat. Thus also lead to the net CO2 emission reduction smaller.
- CO2 emission from incinerating DOC(in the municipal waste) that is not degraded and
being kept in landfill for the long term in the baseline case:
- CO2 emission from incinerating DOC(in the municipal waste) that originally forms
CH4 in the landfill in the baseline case.
|
|
(Calculation)
1.The amount of CH4 emission from the municipal waste landfill (EACH4)
E ACH4 = 0 t- CH4/a
2.CO2 emission from the existing coal fired boilers (EAbolr)
EAbolr = WA1× C1 × Bf1 × 44/12 =
63,497.6 t-CO2/a, where
WA1 = coal consumption by the existing boilers in the AIJ project case.
WA1 = WB1 - H1 × 103/Q1 = 62,666.7 -
72.98 × 103/3.465 = 41,604.7 t/a, where
H1 = Heat quantity of those amount of steam that will be generated from the municipal
waste incineration in the FBC boiler of the AIJ project: 72.98 Tcal/a
Q1 = Heat quantity of steam generated by combusting per ton of coal in the existing
boilers;
Q1 = Q2 × h = 3.465 Gcal-steam/t
Q2 = Calorific value of the local coal (from Hegang coal mine): 4.62 Gcal/t
h = Conversion efficiency of the existing boilers: 75 %
C1 = the carbon content of the local coal: 48.4 %
Bf1= the burning efficiency of the existing boiler : 86 %
3. Amount of CO2 emission from additional electricity consumption necessary for
operation of the municipal waste incineration (EAelec)
EAelec = Elec× 24 h/d × D × Q3 = 5,220 t-CO2/a,
where
Elec = Electric power demand in the municipal waste incineration plant: 623kW
D = Annual working days of the municipal waste incineration plant: 320 d/a
Q3 = CO2 emission by unit kWh electricity generation from the local power
grid.
Q3 = W2 × Ccoal × 44/12 = 1.091 ×
10-3 t-CO2/kwh
W2 = Coal consumption per kWh electricity generation: 410 gce/kWh
Ccoal = Carbon emission factor per ton of coal equivalent: 0.726 t-C/tce
4. CO2 emission from by incinerating man-made sources (plastics and chemical fabrics) in
the municipal waste (EAplf)
EAplf = Cplf × 44/12 = 5,027 t-CO2/a , where
Cplf = Annual amount of carbon content of plastics and chemical fabrics contained in the
municipal waste for incineration.
Cplf = Cplf1 + Cplf2 + Cplf3 + Cplf4 = 1,371
t-C/a
The carbon content of these plastics and chemical fabrics varies along with seasons.
|
|
(1) For the first season (Winter)
Cplf1 = Amount of carbon content of plastics and chemical fabrics contained in the
municipal waste in the first season (from Jan. to March)
Cplf1= G1 × D1 × (1-w 1) ×
PFc1 = 285.6 t-C, where
G1 = Daily amount of the municipal waste in the first season: 150 t-wet/d
D1 = Working days of the municipal waste incineration in the first season: 75 days
w 1 = water content in the municipal waste in the first season: 33.89 %
PFc1= Carbon content in plastics and chemical fabrics contained in the municipal waste
in the first season: 3.84 %-dry-waste
(2) For the second season (Spring):
Cplf2 = Amount of carbon in plastics and chemical fabrics contained in the municipal
waste in the second season (from April to June)
Cplf2 = G2 × D2 × (1-w 2) ×
PFc2 = 468.9 t-C
G2 = Daily amount of municipal waste in the second season: 200t-wet/d
D2 = Working days of the municipal waste incineration in the second season: 91 days
w 2 = Water content in municipal waste in the second season: 56.26%
PFc2= Carbon content in plastics and chemical fabrics contained in the municipal waste
in the second season: 5.89 %-dry-waste
(3) For the third season (Summer):
Cplf3 = Amount of carbon in plastics and chemical fabrics contained in the municipal
waste in the third season (from July to Sept.)
Cplf3 = G3 × D3 × (1-w 3) ×
PFc3 = 78.8 t-C
G3 = Daily amount of municipal waste in the third season: 158t-wet/d
D3 = Working days of the municipal waste incineration in the third season: 62 days
w 3 = Water content in municipal waste in the third season: 70.96 %
PFc3= Carbon content in plastics and chemical fabrics contained in the municipal waste
in the third season: 2.77 % -dry-waste
(4) For the fourth season (Autumn)
Cplf4 = Amount of carbon in plastics and chemical fabrics contained in the municipal
waste in the third season (from Oct. to Dec.)
Cplf4 = G4 × D4 × (1-w 4) ×
PFc4 = 537.7 t-C
G4 = Daily amount of municipal waste in the fourth season: 200t-wet/d
|
|
D4 = Working days of the municipal waste incineration in the fourth period: 92 days
w 4 = Water content in municipal waste in the fourth season: 54.83 %
PFc4 = Carbon content in plastics and chemical fabrics contained in the municipal waste
in the fourth season: 6.47 % -dry-waste
5. CO2 emission by combusting coal as auxiliary fuel at the municipal waste incineration
plant in Summer season (EAaux)
EAaux = W3 × C1 × Bf2 × 44/12 =
4,457.0 t-CO2/a
W3 = Coal consumption as auxiliary fuel at the municipal waste incineration plant
W3 = Q4 × 103/Q2 = 2,536.8 t/a
Q4 = Heat quantity required to be supplied by auxiliary coal fuel : 11.72 Tcal/a
Q2 = Calorific value of the local coal: 4.62 Gcal/t
C1 = the carbon content of the local coal (from Hegang coal mine): 48.4 %
Bf2 = the burning efficiency of the FBC waste incineration boiler: 99 %
Calculations as mentioned above are based on the IPCC Methodology Guideline by which CO2
emission from biomass related municipal waste incineration should not be considered as
anthropogenic CO2 emission. As written in the first part of this section, Japanese and
Chinese experts agreed to consider CO2 emission from not-degradable biomass and from
CH4 related degradable biomass in the municipal waste incineration as shown below:
6. CO2 emission from DOC of not being degraded in the municipal waste when is
incinerated (EAnotdeg)
EAnotdeg = G ×f1 × (1-f2) × 44/12 = 13,983.3 t-CO2/a ,
where
G = Annual amount of the municipal waste to be incinerated in the AIJ project): 57,646 t-waste/a
f1 = the content of organic carbon in waste : 0.1788
f2 = ratio on gasification of organic carbon in landfill : 0.63
7. CO2 emission from those parts of biomass related municipal waste incineration that
their carbon content that originally form CH4 in the landfill in the baseline case:
EAwast = EBCH4 ×12/16= 2,164.5 ×12/16 t-C/a = 1623.375 t-C/a =
1623.375 ×44/12
= 5952.4 t-CO2/a
8. CH4 and CO2 emissions in the AIJ project
(1) CH4 emission (EACH4)
E ACH4 = 0 t-CH4/a
|
|
(2) CO2 emission (EAIJCO2)
EAIJCO2= E Abolr + EAwast E Aelec + EAplf +
EAaux + EAnotdeg = 98,137.3 t-CO2/a
( = 78,201.7)
9. Total and CO2 emissions reduction against the baseline
To indicate the extent to which the CH4 emissions contribute to total radioactive
forcing, we calculated its CO2-equivalent emissions in the baseline case by using the
Global Warming Potential (GWP) values for a time horizon of 100 years taken, where reported, from
the most recent IPCC assessment report (IPCC, 1996a). For CH4 the GWP =21.
(1) CH4 emission reduction (RCH4)
RCH4 = EBCH4 - EACH4 = 2,164.5 - 0 = 2,164.5 t-CH4/a
RCH4 (in CO2 equivalent) =2,164.5 × GWP = 45,454.5 ton-CO2
(2) CO2 emissions reduction (RCO2)
RCO2 = EBCO2 – EAIJCO2 = 95,642.8 - 98,137.3 = - 2,494.6
t-CO2/a
(78,201.6) (17,441.1)
|
|
(Results)
Total reduced amount of CO2 emission:
in which : Reduced amount of CH4 emission :
Reduced amount of CO2 emission :
|
42,959.8 ton of CO2 equivalent
(62,895.8) annually
2,164.5 ton of CH4 annually
-2,494.6 ton of CO2 annually
(17,441.1)
|
NOTE: Boldface numbers in bracket show results obtained when the CO2 emission from
incinerating DOC in the municipal waste is not taken into account accoring to IPCC Guideline. Such notation
will be used later in this report.
Reference: Revised 1996, IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Reference Manual, 6.
Waste, 6.1 Overview
Summary table: Projected emission reductions (unit: 1,000 ton/year):
|
GHG
|
1999
|
2000
|
2001
|
2002
|
2003
|
2010
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
95.64
|
95.64
|
95.64
|
95.64
|
95.64
|
95.64
|
|
CH4
|
2.16
|
2.16
|
2.16
|
2.16
|
2.16
|
2.16
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenario
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
97.51 (82.56)
|
98.14
(78.20)
|
98.14 (78.20)
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
0
|
0
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
-1.87 (13.08)
|
-2.49 (17.44)
|
-2.49
(17.44)
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
2.16
|
2.16
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
-1.87 (13.08)
|
-4.37 (30.52)
|
-21.85 (152.60)
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
3.78
|
18.90
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Numbers in ( ) show results obtained by IPCC Guideline approach.
The calculations above are based on the schedule as follow:
Completion of construction: March 2002
Start-up operation: in April 2002
F. Additionality to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the
framework of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows
|
Category of funding
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(US dollars)
|
|
Subsidy for improving international energy use (Japanese national budget which is undertaken by
MITI )
|
0.5 million US$ (1997FY-1998FY)
14.9 million US$ (1999FY-2002FY)
|
|
Own Capital (prepared by Chinese side)
|
|
1US$ = 120 Japanese Yuan
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to
other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the
Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of
endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties
|
Transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how
|
Describe briefly
|
|
Transfer of Municipal Waste Incine-ration Technology
|
The municipal waste incineration plant consists of fluidized bed type incinerator, waste heat
boiler, combustion gas treatment facility and so on. Steam is recovered from waste heat generated
in incinerating municipal waste.
The project demonstrates that recovered steam can replace steam generated from combustion of coal.
|
|
Capacity Building
|
By implementing the project, following capacity building can be attained:
- AIJ Project management
- Operation of the municipal waste incineration plant
3. Operation of the municipal waste collecting and transport system
|
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties,
effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered
1) Any practical experience gained:
Since the Project is a demonstration project, dissemination activity of the technology through
demonstration operation is planned in the final stage of overall project schedule. A larger effect of
energy conservation and environmental improvement would be expected through dissemination of the technology
in the future
2) Technical difficulties:
Since the municipal waste incineration technology has been widely disseminated in Japan and enough
practical and commercial experience has been already compiled, therefore the technology is highly reliable.
For this reason, technical difficulty does not exist.
3) Negative impacts and/or effects encountered:
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental nega-tive impacts/effects in detail :
|
No.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental negative impacts/effects?
|
No.
|
|
Describe social/cultural negative impacts/effects in detail :
|
No.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social negative impacts/effects?
|
No.
|
|
Describe economic negative impacts/effects in detail :
|
No.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic negative impacts/effects?
|
No.
|
4) Other obstacles encountered:
5) Other:
|
Suggestion on monitoring, verification and reporting of CO2 emission reduction in the
project operation.
5.1. CO2 monitoring tasks
The overall task of the monitoring is to make the carbon balance monitoring within the entire
system boundary of the project, in order to determining the real CO2 emission level and
the corresponding CO2 emission reduction. So it can be done by the following monitoring
tasks.
5.1.1. Energy balance monitoring
All energy consumed, including coal, electricity, steam, waste gas, for all process, including the
municipal waste incineration, heat supply and electric supply, will be measured regularly, and the
measuring data will be acquired and recorded during the project operation.
5.1.2. CO2 emission monitoring
Based on the energy efficiency and technical data available for those processes, the CO2
emission balance could be calculated or measured.
5.2 Baseline determination
Similarly, the CH4 and CO2 emission balance for the baseline case, i.e. in
the municipal waste landfill case, should be measured or compared. In case some data are not
available, some additional on-site surveys are required.
5.3 Personnel training
(1) The key staff member of the plant will be educated to enhance their public awareness on the
CO2 emission mitigation, climate change and AIJ pilot phase under UNFCCC.
(2) The professional training will be done for the technical engineers and workers who will be
involved in the monitoring tasks.
The training course could be given three months in advance of the plant’s commission.
|
|
|