|
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY (AIJ)
List of Projects
USIJI Uniform Reporting Document:
Activities Implemented Jointly Under the Pilot Phase
A. Description of the AIJ project
1. Title of project: Rio Condor Carbon Sequestration Project
2. Host country: Chile
-
Brief project description:
- The Río Cóndor Carbon Sequestration Project is reducing carbon emissions from a 272,880 hectare
forest management project in Tierra del Fuego, Chile. The land is owned and managed by Forestal Savia Ltda., a
Chilean company. CFix, L.L.C., a Washington State Limited Liability Company, is managing the carbon offset
opportunity in partnership with Fundación Chile, a Chilean non-profit organization focused on technology
transfer, new business development and sustainable development in Chile.
The Project will achieve additional carbon storage by preserving old growth forests that would have been
converted into young, managed stands in the baseline scenario. Sustainable forest management will continue
on the lands not protected by the carbon project. In the future, the project will reduce emissions by
preserving sphagnum bogs that are found on the property and that are vulnerable to third-party
concessionaires.
The forest preservation measures will result in approximately 15,469,278 million metric tonnes of avoided
CO2 emissions over the 60-year life of the project. Emission reductions over the life of the
project will increase by 20,247,390 tonnes to 35,716,668 tonnes when the bog component is incorporated into
the project.
All measures are dependant on the eventual sale of carbon offset credits at a price that justifies the
forgone revenues associated with limiting harvest. Furthermore, Forestal Savia, Fundación Chile, and
CFix reserve the right to alter the carbon project in the future.
|
Name of Organization or Individual
|
Country
|
|
Forestal Savia
|
Chile
|
|
Fundación Chile
|
Chile
|
|
CFix LLC
|
U.S.A.
|
|
SGS International Certification Systems (Carbon Offset Verification Division)
|
The Netherlands
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
|
Fundación Chile
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project design, government relations, strategic planning
|
|
Street
|
Avenida Parque Antonio Rabat Sur 6155
|
|
City
|
Santiago
|
|
Country
|
Chile
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
www.fundch.cl
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Bitran
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Eduardo
|
|
Job title
|
Director General
|
|
Direct telephone
|
56-2-241-9362
|
|
Direct fax
|
56-2-241-9386
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
ebitran@fundch.cl
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Morales
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Eduardo
|
|
Job title
|
Jefe de Proyectos (Project Manager)
|
|
Direct telephone
|
56-2-2400488
|
|
Direct fax
|
56-2-2419385
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
emorales@fundch.cl
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
|
Forestal Savia
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project development, project administration
|
|
Street
|
21 de Mayo 1668
|
|
City
|
Punta Arenas
|
|
Country
|
Chile
|
|
Telephone
|
56-61-241434
|
|
Fax
|
56-61-224078
|
|
E-mail
|
saviaefb@entelchile.net
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Fahrenkrog
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Edmundo
|
|
Job title
|
General Manager
|
|
Direct telephone
|
56-61-241-434
|
|
Direct fax
|
56-61-224-078
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
saviaefb@entelchile.net
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
|
CFix LLC
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Project development, Project administration
|
|
Street
|
4350 Cordata Parkway
|
|
City
|
Bellingham
|
|
State
|
Washington
|
|
Post code
|
98226
|
|
Country
|
U.S.A.
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Wheeler
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Keith
|
|
Job title
|
President
|
|
Direct telephone
|
(802) 985-0789
|
|
Direct fax
|
(802) 985-3163
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
keith@concord.org
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Jack
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Darby
|
|
Job title
|
Project Manager
|
|
Direct telephone
|
(360) 715-7281
|
|
Direct fax
|
(360) 676-4465
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
dwj@trilliumcorp.com
|
|
Item
|
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name of organization (original language)
|
SGS International Certification Services
|
|
Department
|
Carbon Offset Verification Service
|
|
Function(s) within the AIJ project activities
|
Verification
|
|
Street
|
Mallekijk 18
|
|
City
|
Spijkkenisse
|
|
Country
|
The Netherlands
|
|
World Wide Web-URL address
|
www.sgsgroup.com
|
|
Administrative Officer Responsible for the Project
|
|
Surname
|
Aalders
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Edwin
|
|
Job title
|
Senior Project Manager
|
|
Direct telephone
|
31-0-181-69-33-33
|
|
Direct fax
|
31-0-181-69-35-72
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
Edwin_Alders@sgsgroup.com
|
|
Contact Person for AIJ Activities (if different from the Administrative Officer)
|
|
Surname
|
Philips
|
|
First name, middle name
|
Gareth
|
|
Job title
|
Lead Assessor
|
|
Direct telephone
|
+44 (1224) 793600
|
|
Direct e-mail
|
Gareth_Phillips@sgsgroup.com
|
-
5. Description of AIJ project activities
|
Item
|
|
|
Type of Project
|
|
Sector(s)
|
Land Use Change and Forestry
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Preservation of threatened old growth forests and sphagnum bogs
|
|
Project Location
|
|
Country
|
Chile
|
|
Exact location (city, state, region)
|
Tierra del Fuego, XII Region. The nearest communities are Porvenir, the capital of Chilean Tierra del
Fuego, (population c. 5000), and the Timaukel Cooperative (population 250). Porvenir is about 250 km
northwest by gravel road from the Project headquarters at Vicuña.
|
|
Key Dates and Current Stage of Project
|
|
Project starting date (month/year)
|
January 1998
|
|
Project ending date (month/year)
|
January 2058
|
|
Project lifetime (years)
|
60
|
|
Current stage of project
|
In progress
|
|
General Project Description and Technical Data
|
|
Objectives
The Carbon Sequestration Project reduces emissions of carbon and protects biological diversity by
preserving old growth forests that would otherwise be converted to young, managed forest. Furthermore, the
project will in the future seek to reduce emissions of carbon by protecting threatened sphagnum bogs.
The carbon project is an integral part of a sustainable forest management project being developed by
Forestal Savia. The overarching vision that drives the integrated forestry-carbon project is to use the
forest ecosystem in ways that are ecologically sustainable, economically viable and socially beneficial.
Project Site
The property consists of 272,878 hectares of land, of which 150,716 hectares are forested. The Project is
divided into two areas, a western and an eastern section, separated by another ownership and three lakes.
The western and southern edges have extensive boundaries along the Whiteside Channel and Admiralty Sound.
The eastern boundary of the property abuts the border of Argentina.
The Project area is located between the cold steppes (grasslands) and the rugged, glaciated mountains that
respectively occupy the northern and southern halves of Tierra del Fuego. Topography in the Project area is
mountainous, with moderate slopes and broad flat valley bottoms. Since the Project area is located at 54
degrees south latitude, the maritime climate is cool to cold, wet and windy (Arroyo et al. 1996). Mean
annual temperatures are 2.5 to 3.0° C and monthly temperatures vary from means around –4.0°
C in July to about 9° C in January. Annual precipitation declines from about 1000 mm in the west to
500 mm in the east.
Landscapes in the Project area are typically mosaics of forested and non-forested ecosystems. In the west,
patchworks of forest and turba (sphagnum bogs and associated wetlands) are common; forests are typically
mixtures of Nothofagus pumilio (lenga) and Nothofagus betuloides (coigue). In the east, forest is
interspersed with moist grasslands, and turba predominates; forests are typically composed solely of lenga.
A third tree species, Nothofagus antartica (ñirre) occurs throughout the Project area at the ecotones
between forest and non-forest vegetation. Nowhere does this species reach commercial size.
Nearly all the forests within the Project area are well developed, old growth forests, which have no
previous history of logging or other human disturbance. Stands are well developed structurally with
dominant trees typically attaining heights of 20 to 25 meters and diameters of 1.0 meters. These forest
stands are in a very stable or equilibrium condition. Wind is the natural disturbance agent of the forests
in the Project area and regularly creates small openings or gaps in the forest canopy. Seedlings of lenga
already present in the understory respond to the increased light to grow to larger sizes—a process
referred to as gap-phase reproduction.
The lenga forests are noted for their simple composition and structure. The most conspicuous features of
these stands are the abundant boles of live mature and old trees, recent gaps filled with dense patches of
seedlings, and abundant logs and other woody debris on the forest floor. A low ground layer dominated by
herbs, grasses, and lenga seedlings is typically the only plant understory.
Some human disturbance of the landscape has occurred. A small percentage of the forest—primarily in
areas immediately adjacent to the coast or sheep ranches—was logged in the first half of this
century. Selective logging of individual trees was the most common method, and there is still evidence of
these activities in the form of blazed trees and cut logs. Fires of human origin have also killed forests
in some areas. Nothofagus forests in general—and lenga forests in particular—are not well
adapted to fire and fail to regenerate in its wake. This failure is probably due to the fact that natural
fires seldom occur in the region. Most of the fires probably occurred in the middle of the century. North
American beaver, introduced to Tierra del Fuego in 1946, have dammed streams and flooded some areas of
riparian forest.
Principle Activities
The baseline or reference scenario for the project is that the entire forest area would be transformed from
old growth stands to young even aged managed stands, in a manner designed to ensure sustainable yield and
to comply fully with all Chilean laws and regulations. Greenhouse gas benefits come from three principle
activities:
- 1. The creation of approximately 133,000 hectares of voluntary preservation areas that will protect,
among other things, 35,000 hectares of mature commercial grade forest. At present, only the portion of the
reserves that protects commercial grade forest that would have been harvested in the baseline scenario is
eligible for emission reduction credit. The reserves will also protect threatened sphagnum peat bogs, which
may warrant credit in the future. Control all reserve lands will be transferred in perpetuity to qualified
conservation organization via a conservation easement or legal equivalent.
2. 20% aggregate retention (i.e., 20% of the area harvested will be retained in small patches of
unaltered forest).
3. Voluntary buffers that exceed legally required buffers will protect an additional 8250 hectares of
commercial forest.
In the future, greenhouse gas benefits may also be created by preserving sphagnum bogs found on the
Forestal Savia property that are currently vulnerable to exploitation by third parties.
Monitoring and Verification
Monitoring will be carried out by CFix and Forestal Savia, and will focus on two broad areas. First,
Forestal Savia will carry out periodic (3-5 year) comprehensive surveys of the Río Cóndor
property to determine changes in forest area and condition. At present aerial photography is the preferred
technology for this work, but satellite imaging may be used in the future. Second, Forestal Savia is
carrying out a detailed harvesting experiment that will provide statistically robust time series data on
the effects of harvesting on carbon storage in biomass and necromass (necromass is defined as course woody
debris—a significant carbon pool in the Río Cóndor forests).
Landscape-level and stand-level data will be verified by SGS International Certification Services. SGS will
also visit harvest sites to insure that the harvesting that does occur is done is in accordance with the
terms of the carbon offset project. Finally, SGS will monitor externalities that may arise as a result of
the project (e.g., leakage and social impacts). SGS will ultimately issue periodic certificates that verify
that the expected carbon offset has actually occurred.
|
|
Methodology for Calculating Cost Data
|
|
CFix, Fundación Chile and Forestal Savia consider cost data to be confidential business information.
The largest cost by far is, however, the opportunity cost associated with forgoing the right to harvest
tens of thousands of hectares of old growth lenga forest.
|
|
Item
|
Please Complete
|
|
Parties that will be monitoring project activities
|
Forestal Savia, with assistance from CFix
|
|
Party that will be externally verifying project results
|
SGS International Certification Services
|
|
Date when the monitoring plan became (or will become) operational (month/year)
|
October 1998
|
|
Types of data that will be collected
|
Landscape level data:
- Area harvest per year and volume removed from harvest units
- Every 3-5 years: comprehensive remote sensing survey to detect other changes in the extent or condition
of the forest present on the entire ownership.
Stand level data:
- Harvesting experiment to track variables used in carbon model in representative stands (carbon stocks
in biomass and necromass; growth and decay; biomass removal at harvest; mortality, etc.).
- Data will be gathered in harvested and unharvested stands. Plots were carefully chosen so as to isolate
the effects of harvesting (as opposed to the effects of variation between sites).
SGS will monitor other harvesting activities in the region and indicators of the social impacts of the
project.
Finally, Forestal Savia is collecting a wide range of data regarding the environmental impacts of the
forestry operations (e.g., stream sediment load, population dynamics of a range of organisms) as well as
data on abiotic factors such as temperature, precipitation and wind.
|
|
Description of Monitoring and Verification Activities and Schedule for Implementation
|
|
Monitoring will occur as described above. Forestal Savia will carry out the monitoring activities with
technical support from CFix LLC. SGS will conduct verification visits, initially every year (most likely in
January) and eventually every three years. Data collection for stand-level monitoring will occur every
year; remote sensing will occur every three to five years, as appropriate. If major disturbances are
detected, a remote sensing assessment will be carried out immediately.
|
|
Item
|
Please Complete
|
|
Please check one of the following.
|
This report is a first report.
or
This report is an intermediate report.
or
This report is a final report.
|
|
Please check one of the following:
|
This report is a joint report. Letter(s) of approval of this report from the designated national authority
of the other Party(ies) involved in the activity is(are) attached in Section J, Annex.
or
This report is a separate report.
|
|
Additional comments (if any):
|
|
|
Compatibility with Economic Development and Socioeconomic and Environmental Priorities
|
|
The project complies fully with national and regional development and environmental goals. The integrated
forest management and carbon sequestration project will provide employment for Chileans in the region while
managing the forest in a way that will ensure the long-term viability of local ecosystems.
Chile’s desire to foster economic development in the region is demonstrated by the Navarino Law (Ley
Nº 18.392 Del 14.01.85), which provides significant economic incentives for investments on the island
of Tierra del Fuego, including tax exemptions and a subsidy equivalent to 20% of sales of goods and
services created on the island.
At the same time, Chile has a strong commitment to sustainable development. For instance, Chile is a
signatory of the Convention on Biological Diversity, which requires nations to integrate conservation and
the sustainable use of biodiversity. The conservation measures that underpin the carbon offset project and
the forest management activities that will still occur comply fully with Chile’s obligations under
the Convention on Biological Diversity.
Finally, a significant percentage of the proceeds from a future sale of emission reduction credits will be
used to fund ecotourism projects that will be jointly developed by Fundación Chile and Forestal Savia.
|
-
D. Environmental, social/cultural, and economic impacts of the AIJ project
|
Non-Greenhouse-Gas Environmental Impacts of the Project
|
|
The Río Cóndor Carbon Sequestration Project will have significant positive nongreenhouse gas
environmental impacts, in comparison with the Projected Baseline.
Reserve Lands
The reserve lands will preserve for all time approximately 133,000 hectares of biologically rich land in
one of the world’s most remote ecosystems, including over 62,000 hectares of commercial grade
old-growth forest that would have been converted to young, managed stands in the baseline scenario. The
property is comprised of a complex mosaic of vegetation types. The preservation of such a large, intact
array of ecosystems represents a globally significant step towards the conservation of biological
diversity.
Though important in its own right, this reserve is even more significant in the context of Chile’s
threatened native forests. Of the 3,400,346 hectares of lenga forest identified in a comprehensive survey
of vegetation in Chile, about 16%, or 566,531 hectares, are currently protected. Most other lenga forests
are in private hands and vulnerable to unsustainable logging and land-use change. Furthermore, most of the
lenga forests in protected areas are not part of a mosaic of forest and wetland, as is the case in Tierra
del Fuego.
Retention
Aggregate retention on commercial forestry lands will help conserve biological diversity. Aggregate
retention entails leaving small sections of unharvested forest, totaling 10% of the harvested area. The
exact distribution will vary with the landscape, but in general the principle is to leave two tenths of
each hectare harvested. This conserves biological diversity and ecosystem functions in four ways:
First, retention helps to maintain viable populations of a large array of organisms, and through them
processes, that may have been locally eradicated under baseline harvest practices, by:
- Maintaining habitat;
- Mitigating harsh microclimates (i.e., maintain forest climate);
- Maintaining diversity of below-ground ecosystems, which depend heavily on energy flows from
above-ground organisms; and
- Providing a "seed source" for lichens, fungi, and other slow-dispersing organisms.
Second, retention retains structural diversity, which is in turn an important factor in protecting
biological diversity. Aggregate retention creates islands of forest with all the characteristics of an
old-growth forest.
Third, by maintaining patches of forest, retention increases connectivity throughout the matrix of managed
lands—an important factor in the preservation of genetic diversity.
Fourth, retention helps mitigate the edge effects that can diminish the effectiveness of other, larger
reserves.
Increased Buffers
The increased buffers will further protect rivers and streams from sediment associated with logging
activities.
|
|
Social/Cultural Impacts of the Project
|
|
The carbon offset project will not have significant social or cultural impacts (though see the following
box).
|
|
Economic Impacts of the Project
|
|
The carbon offset project will entail a reduction in the scale of the forestry project, and may therefore
result in less employment in the region in the short-term. In the medium- and long-term, however, any loss
of employment associated with the carbon project will be offset by new opportunities in tourism created by
the carbon Project. Furthermore, the carbon project is part of a larger shift in thinking about how to
manage the Río Cóndor forests. Part of the emerging strategy is to add value to the wood in
Chile—a step that will create significant employment opportunities.
|
-
E. Greenhouse gas impacts of the AIJ project
1. Scenario description
|
Item
|
Please Complete for Each Site
|
|
Site Designation
|
|
Site number (order of presentation in this report)
|
1 of 1
|
|
Site name/designation
|
Río Cóndor
|
|
Project sector
|
Land use change and forestry
|
|
Reference Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Conversion of old growth forest to young, managed forest
|
|
Has the reference scenario changed since the last report? (If yes, explain any changes below.)
|
Yes
No
This is the first project report.
|
|
Description:
The Projected Baseline assumes that all forest lands found on Forestal Savia’s ownership would have
been transformed into a managed even aged stands over the next 110 years in a manner that fully complies
with Chilean law and that ensures sustainable yield. This scenario is based on three considerations: a)
allowable practices under Chilean law; b) prevailing practices on comparable lands in the region; and c)
the initial forestry plans developed by the company prior to the inception of the carbon project.
Specifically, the baseline scenario entails an average annual harvest of approximately 1200 hectares of
forest over the 110 year cutting cycle, bringing the total area under management to approximately 134,698
hectares (this is a net figure and excludes legally required watershed protection measures; calculated
using Forestal Savia’s GIS). It is assumed that this management would have been done in full accord
with Chilean law and in a manner that would ensure sustainability.
In the future, the baseline scenario will be expanded to include the fact that the sphagnum bogs found on
the property are coming under development pressure.
|
|
Predicted Project Scenario
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Sustainable forest management and forest preservation
|
|
Description:
Forest management activities will continue, but the area under sustainable management will be reduced in
three ways:
- Approximately 35,000 hectares of permanent preserves
- 20% aggregate retention
- 8,250 hectares of voluntary reserves.
This scenario entails an average annual harvest of approximately 650 hectares over the 110 year cutting
cycle, bringing the total area under management to 72,427 hectares (i.e., over 62,000 hectares will be
protected under the carbon project that would have been harvested in the baseline project).
In the future, the predicted project scenario will include the sphagnum bog protection measures that are
currently being developed by CFix.
|
|
Actual Project
|
|
Primary activity(ies)
|
Land use change and forestry
|
|
Description:
This is the first report.
|
|
GHG Emission/Sequestration Calculation Methodology
|
|
Site number
|
1 of 1
|
|
Project sector
|
Land use change and forestry
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Reference Scenario
|
|
The methodology used to calculate carbon emissions in the baseline scenario has two components. The first
component is a "per hectare model" that predicts the change in carbon stores in a given hectare
as the result of harvest. The model tracks carbon stored in biomass and in necromass and takes into account
the following parameters: original carbon stocks; carbon removed at harvest and in subsequent silvicultural
interventions; growth; decay; and mortality. Emissions are calculated to be the difference between average
storage capacity in the old growth forest and average storage capacity in the managed forest. Four
variations of the per-hectare model were developed for each of four forest strata and the entire forest
area was stratified based on density (i.e., stems per hectare).
The per hectare models were developed primarily by Dr. Mark Harmon of Oregon State University. Data for the
original carbon stocks is from statistically robust inventories carried out by Forestal Savia and by CFix.
Estimates of the amount of carbon removed at harvest come from observations of yields from initial
harvesting. Growth data is based on extensive studies carried out in similar forests throughout southern
Chile and was compiled by Professor Patricio Nuñez of Universidad de la Frontera in Temuco, Chile.
Decay data is from a statistically robust peer reviewed study done in similar forests on the Argentine side
of the island of Tierra del Fuego (Frangi, J.L., L.L Richter, M.D. Barrera, and M. Aloggia. 1997.
Decomposition of Nothofagus fallen woody debris in forests of Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Canadian Journal
of Forest Resources 27:1095-1102.). Mortality was estimated by Drs. Jerry Franklin, Mark Harmon, and
Juan Armesto, all of whom are well regarded forest ecologists with extensive experience in the Río
Cóndor forests. Conversion factors used to convert biomass and necromass to carbon are based on widely
accepted values. All modeling was reviewed by Dr. Sandra Brown of Winrock International and by SGS.
The second component of the calculation methodology is a computer program that estimates the sustainable
yield that can be obtained from a given area. The user enters the area of each strata to be managed, and
the forest characteristics and management prescriptions for each strata (including stocking and growth
rates, timing and intensity of thinnings, etc.). The program uses an iteration algorithm to find the
maximum amount of material that can be removed on a sustainable basis and in accordance with the management
prescriptions for each strata. Only areas that can actually be harvested are included (i.e., the total
forest area less buffers, carbon reserves, and other protection areas). In the case of the baseline
scenario, it was assumed that 134,968 hectares would be available for management (this is a net figure;
buffers and other watershed protection measures are not included). This figure was calculated using the
Forestal Savia GIS database, and is based on extensive remote sensing and ground-truthing work.
The baseline emissions for each year are simply the product of the change in average storage capacity in
each strata and the area of each strata that would have been harvest.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Project Scenario
|
|
The calculation methodology for the Project Scenario is identical to that described above. It is assumed
that the same management prescriptions would have been used in both scenarios. The only difference is
therefore the area available for management that is input into the harvest simulator. In the project
scenario, it is assumed that 72,427 hectares are available for management. Thus, the total preservation
attributable to the carbon project is just over 62,000 hectares.
|
|
Description of Calculation Methodology for the Actual Project
|
|
Predictions from the per hectare model are being compared with observed changes in harvested plots.
|
-
3. GHG emission/sequestration data
|
Projected Net Greenhouse Gas Benefits: All Project Sites (Continued)
(Tonnes, Full Molecular Weight Basis)
|
|
Reference Scenario Emissions
|
Project Scenario Emissions
|
Net GHG Benefits
(Reference Scenario - Project Scenario)
|
Cumulative GHG Benefits
(Reference Scenario - Project Scenario)
|
|
Year
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
CO2-
Equivalent
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
|
26
|
158,496
|
|
|
85,075
|
|
|
73,420
|
0
|
0
|
73,420
|
73,420
|
0
|
0
|
|
27
|
158,496
|
|
|
85,075
|
|
|
73,420
|
0
|
0
|
73,420
|
146,840
|
0
|
0
|
|
28
|
158,496
|
|
|
85,075
|
|
|
73,420
|
0
|
0
|
73,420
|
220,261
|
0
|
0
|
|
29
|
158,496
|
|
|
85,075
|
|
|
73,420
|
0
|
0
|
73,420
|
293,681
|
0
|
0
|
|
30
|
158,496
|
|
|
85,075
|
|
|
73,420
|
0
|
0
|
73,420
|
367,101
|
0
|
0
|
|
31
|
702,809
|
|
|
377,245
|
|
|
325,564
|
0
|
0
|
325,564
|
692,665
|
0
|
0
|
|
32
|
702,809
|
|
|
377,245
|
|
|
325,564
|
0
|
0
|
325,564
|
1,018,229
|
0
|
0
|
|
33
|
702,809
|
|
|
377,245
|
|
|
325,564
|
0
|
0
|
325,564
|
1,343,793
|
0
|
0
|
|
34
|
702,809
|
|
|
377,245
|
|
|
325,564
|
0
|
0
|
325,564
|
1,669,357
|
0
|
0
|
|
35
|
702,809
|
|
|
377,245
|
|
|
325,564
|
0
|
0
|
325,564
|
1,994,920
|
0
|
0
|
|
36
|
747,915
|
|
|
401,456
|
|
|
346,458
|
0
|
0
|
346,458
|
2,341,379
|
0
|
0
|
|
37
|
747,915
|
|
|
401,456
|
|
|
346,458
|
0
|
0
|
346,458
|
2,687,837
|
0
|
0
|
|
38
|
747,915
|
|
|
401,456
|
|
|
346,458
|
0
|
0
|
346,458
|
3,034,296
|
0
|
0
|
|
39
|
747,915
|
|
|
401,456
|
|
|
346,458
|
0
|
0
|
346,458
|
3,380,754
|
0
|
0
|
|
40
|
747,915
|
|
|
401,456
|
|
|
346,458
|
0
|
0
|
346,458
|
3,727,213
|
0
|
0
|
|
41
|
756,553
|
|
|
406,093
|
|
|
350,460
|
0
|
0
|
350,460
|
4,077,673
|
0
|
0
|
|
42
|
756,553
|
|
|
406,093
|
|
|
350,460
|
0
|
0
|
350,460
|
4,428,132
|
0
|
0
|
|
43
|
756,553
|
|
|
406,093
|
|
|
350,460
|
0
|
0
|
350,460
|
4,778,592
|
0
|
0
|
|
44
|
756,553
|
|
|
406,093
|
|
|
350,460
|
0
|
0
|
350,460
|
5,129,052
|
0
|
0
|
|
45
|
756,553
|
|
|
406,093
|
|
|
350,460
|
0
|
0
|
350,460
|
5,479,512
|
0
|
0
|
|
46
|
380,075
|
|
|
204,012
|
|
|
176,063
|
0
|
0
|
176,063
|
5,655,575
|
0
|
0
|
|
47
|
380,075
|
|
|
204,012
|
|
|
176,063
|
0
|
0
|
176,063
|
5,831,638
|
0
|
0
|
|
48
|
380,075
|
|
|
204,012
|
|
|
176,063
|
0
|
0
|
176,063
|
6,007,702
|
0
|
0
|
|
49
|
380,075
|
|
|
204,012
|
|
|
176,063
|
0
|
0
|
176,063
|
6,183,765
|
0
|
0
|
|
50
|
380,075
|
|
|
204,012
|
|
|
176,063
|
0
|
0
|
176,063
|
6,359,828
|
0
|
0
|
|
51
|
79,042
|
|
|
42,427
|
|
|
36,615
|
0
|
0
|
36,615
|
6,396,443
|
0
|
0
|
|
52
|
79,042
|
|
|
42,427
|
|
|
36,615
|
0
|
0
|
36,615
|
6,433,057
|
0
|
0
|
|
53
|
79,042
|
|
|
42,427
|
|
|
36,615
|
0
|
0
|
36,615
|
6,469,672
|
0
|
0
|
|
54
|
79,042
|
|
|
42,427
|
|
|
36,615
|
0
|
0
|
36,615
|
6,506,287
|
0
|
0
|
|
55
|
79,042
|
|
|
42,427
|
|
|
36,615
|
0
|
0
|
36,615
|
6,542,901
|
0
|
0
|
|
56
|
119,793
|
|
|
64,301
|
|
|
55,492
|
0
|
0
|
55,492
|
6,598,393
|
0
|
0
|
|
57
|
119,793
|
|
|
64,301
|
|
|
55,492
|
0
|
0
|
55,492
|
6,653,886
|
0
|
0
|
|
58
|
119,793
|
|
|
64,301
|
|
|
55,492
|
0
|
0
|
55,492
|
6,709,378
|
0
|
0
|
|
59
|
119,793
|
|
|
64,301
|
|
|
55,492
|
0
|
0
|
55,492
|
6,764,870
|
0
|
0
|
|
60
|
119,793
|
|
|
64,301
|
|
|
55,492
|
0
|
0
|
55,492
|
6,820,362
|
0
|
0
|
|
Total
|
32,380,349
|
0
|
0
|
16,911,071
|
0
|
0
|
15,469,278
|
0
|
0
|
15,469,278
|
6,359,828
|
0
|
0
|
|
Indirect or Secondary GHG Impacts (Positive and Negative)
|
|
The Project will cause numerous indirect reductions in GHG emissions that are not being claimed by the
Project Proponents.
- 1. Roots, soil and litter (no credit is being claimed for avoided emissions from the decay of roots and
of organic material in the soil and litter).
2. Roads (more roads would have been built in the baseline scenario).
3. Reduced emissions from hauling and skidding.
|
|
Factors That Could Cause the Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
The Río Cóndor Carbon Sequestration Project is relatively risk-free. The forest ecosystem that
stores the carbon is more stable than most temperate forest ecosystems, and is not subject to large-scale
disturbances (e.g., wind, fire or drought). In particular, the risk of fire is now due to the cold, wet
climate and natural barriers to fire such as mountains, rivers and sphagnum bogs. No evidence of
large-scale fire exists on the island.
Wind is by far the most common disturbance agent on the island, but usually is limited to small (<1
hectare) events [Reburtus, A.J., T. Kitxberger, T.T. Veblen, and L.M Roovers. 1997. Blowdown history and
landscape patterns in the Andes of Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Ecology 78(3):678-693]. This
disturbance regime is built into the models that estimate per-hectare carbon stores. Larger windfall events
are very rare and would not result in a major carbon emission due to the slow decay rate of the down
material and the strong regeneration that is characteristic of lenga forests.
|
|
Strategy for Reducing the Risk of Future Loss or Reversal of GHG Benefits
|
|
Forestal Savia is working to minimize the risk of fire associated with harvesting by installing spark
suppressors on all internal combustion equipment and by training staff.
Furthermore, SGS International Certification Systems has applied a risk assessment process to the Río
Cóndor Carbon Sequestration Project. Their assessment considered a comprehensive list of natural,
economic, and political risks. As a result CFix will place approximately 15% of the total credits created
by the project in a reserve; SGS will certify that the remaining credits are "virtually risk
free."
|
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount ($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding (%)
|
|
CFix LLC, Fundación Chile and Forestal Savia
|
Chile and the U.S.A.
|
|
100%
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
-
(b) Funding sources for project implementation
|
Funding Source
|
Country of Funding Source
|
Amount ($US)
|
Percent of Total Funding (%)
|
Is This Funding Assured? (Y/N)
|
|
CFix LLC, Fundación Chile and Forestal Savia
|
Chile and the U.S.A.
|
|
100%
|
Contingent on sale of carbon credits
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
Current or Planned Activities to Obtain Additional Funding
|
|
Ultimately, the financial viability of the carbon offset project hinges on CFix’s ability to sell
carbon offset projects. Proceeds from the sale of the carbon credits will offset the foregone earnings
associated with not harvesting the lands that make up the carbon project. If a carbon sale does not occur
then most of lands now preserved by the carbon project will be harvested.
|
|
Contribution to Capacity Building and Technology Transfer
|
|
The capacity building and technology transfer benefits stemming from the Río Cóndor Project fall
into two categories. First, the forest management component of the project is bringing a host of new
technologies and practices to Chile:
- New insights into the structure and function of the lenga ecosystem and new ways of thinking about how
to these insights into management prescriptions.
- New technologies for generating and using forest inventories and for developing sustainable harvest
models.
- State of the art low-impact road building techniques
- New harvesting, skidding and sawmilling systems
- New remanufacturing and marketing strategies for finished products.
The carbon project per se is also bringing new technologies and practices to Chile:
- CFix has worked to involve local scientists and foresters in the data gathering and carbon dynamic
modeling. CFix brought five Chilean scientists to the United States for a carbon modeling workshop with
North American scientists.
- CFix has also been working in close partnership with Fundación Chile, which is now taking the lead
in developing five additional carbon offset projects (including two which have been submitted to USIJI:
Sociedad Inversora Forestal and Imobliario Las Delicias).
|
-
H. Recent developments, technical difficulties, and obstacles encountered
|
Recent Project Developments
|
|
Project operations began in October 1999, and USIJI approved the proposal on March 29, 2000, subject to
agreement with CONAMA on the baseline scenario.
In January 2000 SGS International Certification Systems completed their final assessment of the Río
Cóndor Carbon Sequestration Project. They are currently completing an internal review process and
should be issuing a certificate of project design along with a schedule of projected emission offsets in
July 2000.
CFix and Fundación Chile have been interacting regularly with CONAMA, the Chilean government entity
that evaluates carbon offset projects, regarding the Río Cóndor baseline. After careful analysis,
CONAMA has concluded that the proposed Río Cóndor baseline scenario is correct.
|
|
Technical Difficulties and Other Obstacles Encountered
|
|
|
Additional Information
|
|
N/A
|
J. Annex
-
2. Letters of approval of this AIJ project report:
- See attached letter of concurrence.
K. Addendum for USIJI Secretariat Only
1. Lead contact for project reporting
|
Item
|
Please Complete If Applicable
|
|
Organization
|
|
Name
|
Darby Jack
|
|
Organization (English)
|
CFix
|
|
Telephone
|
(360) 676-9400
|
|
Fax
|
(360) 676-4465
|
|
E-mail
|
dwj@trilliumcorp.com
|
|
Milestone
|
Date Initiated (if applicable) (month/year)
|
Date Completed (if applicable) (month/year)
|
|
Substantive discussions regarding project
|
March 1995
|
|
|
Pre-feasibility study
|
|
|
|
Feasibility study
|
July 1998
|
August 1998
|
|
Project development (including construction and/or setting up on-site offices, purchase of lands, etc.)
|
Lands were purchased in August 1993. Carbon project development began in July 1998
|
Continuing
|
|
Project operations (including starting management practices, distributing information, training, purchase
of operating equipment, etc.)
|
October 1999
|
|
|
Sequestration or reduction of GHG emissions
|
October 1999
|
|
|
Project financing obtained
|
Final financing will not be secured until GHG emissions reduction credits are sold
|
|
|
Other (please specify)
|
|
|
-
3. Assignment of GHG emission reductions
|
Methodology for Allocating GHG Emission Reductions
|
|
All emissions reductions are assigned to CFix. Proceeds from the sale of emissions reductions will be
divided between CFix, Forestal Savia and Fundación Chile according to a mutually agreed-upon formula.
|
|
Participant
|
Percentage of the Total Emission Reduction Assigned to This Participant
|
|
CFix
|
100
|
|
Total
|
100
|
|
Period
|
Baseline Emissions (metric tonnes)
|
|
From (month/year)
|
To (month/year)
|
CO2
|
CH4
|
N2O
|
Other (Specify)
|
CO2-Equivalent
|
|
1/97
|
1/98
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Methodology for Calculating Baseline Emission/Sequestration Estimates
|
|
No net emissions occurred from the property in the year prior to the commencement of the project because no
significant human activity occurred during that period. The carbon project achieves emissions reductions by
reducing the area harvested as part of the Río Cóndor forestry project, which began harvesting
operations in October 1999.
|
|