UNIFORM REPORTING FORMAT:
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY
UNDER THE PILOT PHASE
UNIFORM REPORTING FORMAT:
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY UNDER THE PILOT PHASE
The uniform reporting format contained below is to be used in reporting on Activities Implemented Jointly
(AIJ) under the pilot phase. It is noted that the reporting should be consistent with decision 5/CP.1 and
8/CP.2 (reproduced in Annexes I and II to this reporting format). The SBSTA notes that the uniform
reporting format could possibly require revision in the light of experience gained and methodological work
conducted under the pilot phase.
List of
Projects
A. Description of project
A. 1) Title of project: Poland/Norway Coal-to-Gas Conversion - AlJ Pilot Project
The objectives of the project as a whole are to stimulate technological and institutional changes to
demonstrate inter-fuel substitution and energy efficiency improvement as a means to support the country
objectives. The total project aims at encouraging and introducing more rapid transition from coal to gas
and introducing more energy efficiency in residential buildings.
The total project has the following components:
- a coal-to-gas conversion component, involving investments in about 30 non-industrial small to
medium-sized heat plants (boilers) for their conversion from coal to natural gas. The projects are for
residential houses and public buildings. The new technologies include gas fired cogeneration of heat and
electricity, condensing boilers as well as conventional gas-fired boilers.
- an energy efficiency component, involving investments in insulation of buildings and the installation
of energy efficient equipment in some hundred new residential units.
- a technical assistance component to project participants, including institutional training, project
management, environmental monitoring and nation-wide marketing.
The AIJ component of the project is funded with a grant of 1.1 million USD from the Department of Natural
Resources and Environmental Affairs of the Government of Norway. Non-AIJ related financing of the project
includes a grant of 25 million USD from the GEF and a further 22 million USD from the Polish National Fund
for Environmental Protection and Water Management (National Fund), voivodeship funds (VF), Environmental
Protection Bank (BOS) and private investors in Poland.
The portion of the project funded by the Government of Norway functions as an AIJ demonstration project
with the objective of assisting Parties to the UNFCCC in gaining experience on how the mechanism of AIJ
might work. The project is administered by the World Bank and is related to other Bank operations in
Poland. The GEF funding is separate from the AIJ financing.
The overall project has an estimated lifetime of 17 years and will give substantial reductions in
greenhouse gas emissions and at the same time reduce air pollution. It has been planned in a manner
consistent with national priorities for sustainable energy development.
A. 2) Participants/actors:
The investor is the Government of Norway, represented by the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs
(RNMFA), Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs. The host is the Government of Poland,
represented by the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry (MoE), Economic
Department.
The entity responsible for co-ordination and reporting on AIJ activities in Poland is the National Fund for
Environmental Protection and Water Management (NF), JI-Secretariat. The implementing agency is the
Environmental Protection Bank (BOS). Within the World Bank, the Department for Central and Eastern Europe
is charged with management of the project, while the Global Environment Department assists in development
of the AIJ component.
The host investors are the private boiler owners, public entities and self-governments.
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation :
|
Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Government of Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs
|
|
Department:
|
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Affairs
|
|
Acronym:
|
-
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
-
|
|
Function with activity:
|
Governmental authority responsible for committing financial resources for AIJ projects and approval
of AIJ project agreements and reports (foreign investor - AIJ)
|
|
Street:
|
Victoria Street, P.O. Box 8114 Dep
|
|
Post Code:
|
0032
|
|
City:
|
Oslo
|
|
Country:
|
Norway
|
|
Telephone:
|
47-22 24 36 03
|
|
Fax:
|
47-22 24 27 82
|
|
E-mail:
|
-
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
-
|
|
Contact Person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mr. Leiro
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Jostein
|
|
Job title:
|
Head of Division
|
|
Direct tel:
|
47-22 24 36 08
|
|
Direct fax:
|
47-22 24 27 82
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
jleiro@online.no
|
.
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation:
|
World Bank
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
World Bank
|
|
Department:
|
Environment Department
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Administration of project on behalf of World Bank - GEF and the Norwegian Government
|
|
Street:
|
1818 H Street, NW
|
|
Post code:
|
20433
|
|
City:
|
Washington DC
|
|
Country:
|
USA
|
|
Telephone:
|
(202) 473-9746
|
|
Fax:
|
(202) 522-3256
|
|
E-mail:
|
Etandberg@worldbank.org
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mr. Tandberg
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Eivind
|
|
Job title:
|
Advisor
|
|
Direct tel:
|
(202) 473-9746
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(202) 522-3256
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
Etandberg@worldbank.org
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation:
|
Ministerstwo Ochrony Srodowiska, Zasobów Naturalnych i Lesnictwa
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry
|
|
Department:
|
Department of Budget and Finance
|
|
Acronym:
|
MOSZNiL
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
MoE
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Host country representative
|
|
Street:
|
Wawelska 52/54
|
|
Post code:
|
00-922
|
|
City:
|
Warsaw
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 22) 25 00 01
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 22) 25 29 73
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mrs. Chochlew
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Irena
|
|
Job title:
|
Director, Department of Budget and Finance
|
|
Direct tel:
|
(+48 22) 25 00 01 ext. 402; 25 17 22
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 22) 25 29 73
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation:
|
Narodowy Fundusz Ochrony Srodowiska i Gospodarki Wodnej, Sekretariat - JI
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
National Found for Environmental Protection and Water Management, JI-Secretariat
|
|
Department:
|
International Department
|
|
Acronym:
|
NFOSiGW
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
NF
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Reporting agency
|
|
Street:
|
Konstruktorska 3A
|
|
Post code:
|
02-673
|
|
City:
|
Warsaw
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 22) 49 22 80; 49 00 80
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 22) 49 20 98
|
|
E-mail:
|
jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.nfosigw.gov.pl/
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mrs. Galon-Kozakiewicz, Ph.D
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Jolanta
|
|
Job title:
|
Head of JI-Secretariat
|
|
Direct tel:
|
(+48 22) 49 22 80; 49 00 80 ext. 504
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 22) 49 20 98
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
jolantak@nfosigw.gov.pl
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organisation:
|
Bank Ochrony Srodowiska SA
|
|
Name of organisation (English):
|
Environmental Protection Bank
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
BOS
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
BOS
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Implementing agency
|
|
Street:
|
Przasnyska 6A
|
|
Post code:
|
01-756
|
|
City:
|
Warsaw
|
|
Country:
|
Poland
|
|
Telephone:
|
(+48 22) 633 55 22
|
|
Fax:
|
(+48 22) 639 73 12
|
|
E-mail:
|
bos_bit@pol.pl
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mr. Urbala, Ph.D.
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Stanis³aw
|
|
Job title:
|
Director GEF Project
|
|
Direct tel:
|
(+48 22) 633 55 22 ext. 392
|
|
Direct fax:
|
(+48 22) 639 73 12
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
bos_bit@pol.pl
|
A. 3) Activity:
All projects:
Technical data of following 12 projects updated 30th of April 1997
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Poland's energy economy is dominated by coal, which is domestically produced. The related
greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution problems are huge.
The share of coal was 77% in 1991, while the share of oil and gas was 21%, one of the lowest in
continental Europe. A shift towards an oil and gas share of 53 to 73% has been estimated by the
World Bank to lead to at least 50% reduction in the carbon dioxide emissions.
One of the reasons for the widespread use of coal is the use for space heating. The use of gas for
space heating was earlier prohibited and the use of oil was held back by various measures. The aim
was to limit foreign exchange expenditures on energy imports. Coal for space heating is used both
in district heating systems, block heating plants (heating several apartments) and in individual
heating in stoves. District heating companies own about 16 GW coal fired boilers, consuming about 6
million tons of coal per year. About 3,2 GW of this capacity is, by the World Bank, considered
suitable for replacement with gas fired boilers.
Removal of the direct regulation of fuel use will result in a shift from coal to gas or oil. Coal
will for reasons of price remain the preferred fuel for relatively large boilers, where economies
of scale offsets the higher costs of coal handling and emission control equipment. Also in small
boilers, coal has until recently been the preferred fuel for economic reasons, but higher coal
prices will reduce its use in the long term.
Environmental standards have been and will be further strengthened for sulphur, particulates and
nitrogen oxide, and effective enforcement will be phased in over many years. This will accelerate
the price-driven conversion of small boilers from coal to gas. The emission standards are
administered by local authorities and linked to these is a system of fees and fines. Emissions of
sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulates, as well as carbon dioxide are taxed. The fees on
carbon dioxide are only of symbolic nature. The other fees could have some albeit small effects on
conversions from coal to gas.
There are several obstacles to conversions from coal to gas. They include lack of access to
financing, budgetary procedures of publicly owned heating companies, and lack of price incentives.
Cost savings in heat production are not felt by consumers because heat prices are subsidised. Only
the local authorities have a well defined interest in reducing costs but often lack the financial
means for investment.
For the immediate future, the conversion of coal to gas will not be financially attractive without
taking into account the global warming considerations and/or local pollution effects.
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Fuel conversion and energy efficiency measures.
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Both the coal-to-gas component and the housing component are located throughout Poland.
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
June 30, 1995
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
June 30, 2000
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
25 mill USD - GEF,
1.1 mill USD - grant from the Government of Norway,
22 mill USD - Poland (National Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (NF),
Voivodeship Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management (VF), BOS, owner's
contribution (Oc))
|
|
2. Project costs
|
48 mill USD (35.5 mill USD - engaged funds for 1997)
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implement-ation performance
|
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
30.1 USD/tCO2* (average concerning 12 projects)
|
|
6. Planned environ-mental benefits
|
141 698 tCO2/year (total concerning 12 projects); 3 259 tCO2/year (concerning
the AIJ component of the project or 2.3% of total planned environmental benefits).
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
A. 4) Cost (to the extent possible):
The project has a 1.1 million USD grant from the Government of Norway, a contribution of about 22 million
USD from Poland and a 25 million USD grant from the GEF. The Polish sources for funding vary, but are most
often a package of funding from the boiler owners themselves, the National Fund for Environmental
Protection and Water Management (NF), Environmental Protection Bank (BOS) and provincial authorities.
|
Item
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year X
|
|
Cost of the project in USD:
|
|
|
|
48 mill
|
|
AIJ component in USD:
|
|
|
|
1.1 mill
|
|
USD per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
High efficiency gas boilers
|
|
|
|
between 11 and 43
|
|
Condensing boiler
|
|
|
|
about 60
|
|
Housing projects
|
|
|
|
between 90 and 120
|
Describe briefly how costs are determined:
The value of the amount granted to the individual project was calculated, in particular:
- additional cost of investment and exploitation of boiler during 17 years in comparison with
- cost of new coal boiler plus a difference of cost of new condensing gas boiler as well as
- partial cost of modernisation of heating system.
The grant will allow the boiler owners to have a profitable percentage of return of the capital.
A. 5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organisations involved a):
|
|
5.1) General Agreement
The Government of Poland has received grant funds from the Government of Norway and from the GEF.
The World Bank is acting as Trustee of GEF Norwegian funds for the project.
On behalf of the Government of Poland, the Minister of EPNR&F is a grantee of this fund. The
MoE, through its Department of Ecological Policy, is responsible for: (a) overall co-ordination and
implementation of this project; and (b) monitoring and reviewing project activities and products to
assure that they are of a high quality and are accomplished in a cost- effective and timely manner.
Recognising the complexity of Joint Implementation Program, the Minister of EPNR&F has
established the Polish Secretariat for Joint Implementation in NF.
BOS is acting as the Implementing Agency for this project and as administrator of project
activities and funds to be used solely for the purposes of the project.
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organisations mentioned is reported
under section A.2 above.
5.2) Monitoring
A monitoring plan to provide data for evaluation of the quantity of greenhouse gas emissions as well as
other environmental benefits the operating costs and the energy savings have been established.
5.2.1) MONITORING OBJECTIVE
The objective of environmental monitoring for the coal-to-gas conversion component of the project is to
provide data for evaluation of pollutant emission reduction, to assess effectiveness of the operating costs
associated with conversion of coal fired boilers to natural gas ones and to evaluate energy saving.
Monitoring should ensure detailed evaluation of revenues and benefits to be reaped from the project's
implementation.
5.2.2) COURSE OF REALISATION
To ensure use of unified data collecting procedures and their analysis, there will be one contractor
selected by competitive bidding, responsible for preparation and carrying out monitoring all over the
country at the realisation stage of the coal-to-gas conversion component of the project. The above
mentioned contractor will implement the monitoring program under supervision of the Ministry of
Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry (MoE) represented by the State Environmental
Inspectorate (PIOS).
The latter's role will consist mainly in working out the rules for monitoring performance, approval of
a monitoring implementation plan for each facility, occasional inspection of work in progress, and
verification of all the reports submitted.
PIOS will supervise environmental monitoring for all the facilities involved in the project and will
evaluate results obtained in effect of individual implementation of fuel conversion projects. The role of
Environmental Protection Bank (BOS), which is the Implementing Agency for the project, will focus on
undertaking the necessary actions ensuring that monitoring of old boilers prior to the conversion can take
place before their modification and on administration and management of the pertinent activity.
5.2.3) SCOPE OF WORK
To attain the project's objectives the contractor will undertake the following actions:
- it will ensure taking all measurements in conformity with the Polish standards,
- it will determine the detailed program of measurement, collecting and processing of the monitored data
in co-operation with the PIOS.
The program should contain in particular:
5.2.3.1) Technical monitoring plan
Technical monitoring of coal fired boiler rooms subject to conversion to gas fuel at the implementation
phase and following realisation.
Monitoring's objective is an ecological economic and energy-wise evaluation of the effectiveness of
conversion of about 30 non-industrial coal fired boiler rooms of up to l5 MW output to gas fired high
efficiency boilers or combined heat and power generation facilities.
Monitoring requires measurement and reporting of technical parameters and emissions of individual coal
fired boiler rooms subject to conversion.
Technical monitoring includes evaluation of the technical state of boilers and their instrumentation,
auxiliaries, quantities of fuel and electrical energy used, fuel and water balance, quantity of thermal and
electric energy produced and efficiency of heat transmission and use by recipients.
In particular this pertains to such problems as:
a) General characteristics of boiler rooms
b) Boilers and auxiliaries:
- evaluation of technical condition of steam and water boilers using their rated characteristics and
actually obtained parameters
- evaluation of technical condition of boilers' basic instrumentation
- evaluation of water quality and its treatment
- evaluation of technical condition of auxiliaries including dust collectors and chimneys
- thermal balance of coal fired boilers
- thermal balance of gas-fired boilers
c) Heat distribution networks, heat transfer systems and major end-user building facilities:
- condition of heat distribution network and its total length
- technical parameters of heat insulation used
- characteristics of heat distribution centres including degree of their automation
- determination of heat loss at boiler room building, in heat distribution network, in heat substations
and at recipient level
- other technical factors affecting the obtained level of energy efficiency of significance for
individual boiler rooms
- distribution balance of all produced energy and water including main recipients
d) Characteristics of fuels used prior to and following conversion:
- average net calorific value
- average total content of combustible sulphur (S)
- average ash content
- average humidity
- average carbon (C) content.
5.2.3.2) Emissions monitoring plan
Ecological monitoring of the selected pollution emissions sources to determine effects of conversion
from solid to gas fuel.
a) Subject Matter
The assumptions pertain to about 30 small and medium non-industrial boiler rooms (hereinafter to be
referred to as the facilities) with a thermal output of under 5MW per boiler unit presently using solid
fuel, predominantly coal.
b) Scope
The scope of these assumptions includes parametric identification of the above mentioned facilities in the
aspect of ecological change resulting from conversion from solid to gas fuel.
c) Goal
The ecological monitoring goal is evaluation of reduction of pollution emitted into the atmosphere by the
above mentioned facilities, which will be an effect of fuel conversion as well as equipment modernisation,
on the basis of technical and emission measurements prior to and following conversion.
d) Realisation
Realisation of the goal as defined should take place in stages, also for reasons of effective control
supported by modern data collecting techniques.
Stage I
- Encoding selected facilities and establishment of a data base to collect current information
- Taking inventory of the facilities as per the prepared inquiry form
- Preparation of documentation prescribing methods of taking measurements including measurement
cross-sections and samplers as standard connector M 64x4mm
- Making changes and alterations for making measurements as per documentation.
Stage II
- Taking measurements of concentration/percentage by volume of pollution emitted from individual
facilities
- Emissions include S02, NO, N02(NOx), CO, C02, volatile
organic compounds and particulate matter and, additionally, 02
- Volume of flue gases stream and percentage of H20 vapours in flue gases will also be
measured
- Analysing results of emissions measurements and concentration, including conversion, to 7%
02 with a view to later comparison in form of a unified sheet.
Stage III
- Prepare documentation describing sampling and measurement facilities required for recording technical
performance and emissions resulting from conversion and modernisation
- Effecting appropriate changes if needed.
Stage IV
- Taking measurements of concentration/percentage by volume of pollution (including S02, NO,
N02(NOx), C0, C02, volatile organic compounds and dust and, additionally,
02 ) emitted from the installations following modernisation of individual facilities
- Measuring volume of flue gas streams and percentage of H20 vapours in flue gases
- Analysing results of emission measurements and concentration including conversion to 7% 02
- Analysis of Stage II and Stage IV results and preparation of final report on effects produced as
consequence of project goals
- Working out the conclusions from the action with a view to using them at modernisation of other
facilities.
e) Course of Realisation
Following approval of a given facility for conversion, but no later than one year before modernisation; its
monitoring will have begun by taking periodic measurements of pollution emissions (implementation of STAGE
II and STAGE IV). The reports on subsequent measurements will be included in the data base.
f) Measuring Technique
Measuring of flue gas flow, gas velocity, dust emissions will be conducted so as to conform to the
requirements of the PN-Z-04030-7:1994 standard (of The International Standard ISO 10870) as for the exact
measurement.
g) Measuring Equipment
The basic rule will be the use of portable measuring systems or the mobile ones capable of registering in
their memory measurement results. This applies to both the measurements of concentration of individual
substances, volume of flue gas stream (e.g. DFM 1194 flow-meter) and concentration and emission of dust
(e.g. EMIOTEST 2594 or equal equipped with a module for measuring gas moisture).
h) Computation of Results of Measurements
- When calculating final results of measurements at Stage II, case a), as the result there should be
given an average emission E as the weighted mean in regard to the time of duration of the full measuring
cycle, including all the combustion phases.
- When calculating final results of measurements at Stage II, case b) and at Stage IV, case a), as the
result there should be given an average emission E as the weighted mean in regard to the time of duration
of the full measuring cycle, including all the combustion phases.
5.2.3.3) Performance report format
In regard of contents of the report on realisation of conversion of coal fired boiler rooms to gas fired
ones.
a) Report Objective
The report should outline in a concise form progress of realisation of coal fired boiler rooms'
conversion to the gas fired ones inclusive of the realisation stages and guidelines offered in 5.2.3.1) and
5.2.3.2) to "MONITORING PLAN FOR COAL-TO-GAS CONVERSION PROJECT".
The report's content should include a brief description of individual events accompanying project
realisation illustrated with tables and diagrams.
It should end up with conclusions useful for improvement of realisation of the other projects of the same
type and for the final evaluation of ecological, economic and technical effectiveness achieved as a result
of boiler room reconstruction in connection with conversion from coal to gas fuel.
b) Reporting Procedure
It is assumed that three reports will be drawn up for each facility:
- Preliminary report
- Interim report
- Final report
5.2.4) LOGISTICS
After the contract is effective, BOS and the Contractor will develop a mutually acceptable schedule for the
pre-conversion monitoring of old coal-fired boiler facilities selected for conversion to gas-firing under
the project, including a monitoring schedule of the heat distribution and transfer systems and the end-user
building facilities supplied by the old boilers.
Similarly, BOS and the Contractor will develop a schedule for the post-conversion monitoring of new
facilities and their associated heat distribution, transfer and end-use systems.
Such schedules (Preconversion Monitoring Schedule and Post-Conversion Monitoring Schedule) will include
organisational solutions guaranteeing the starting date for the pre-conversion and post-conversion
monitoring activities at each individual project site and the access of the contractor to the individual
project site to carry out such activities.
BOS will notify the Contractor at least 3 weeks prior to the proposed monitoring start date of each
individual project site.
5.2.5) REPORTING
Within 6 weeks after the contract is effective, the Contractor shall develop a standard form, acceptable to
PIOS, for reporting pre-conversion and post-conversion monitoring activity and results for individual
conversion project, including a standard environmental report form.
The Contractor together with the Boiler Owner and the Boiler Owners' Representative shall prepare and
submit to BOS a monitoring report in accordance with the above mentioned standard form, for each individual
project realised.
BOS will ensure timely distribution of the individual reports to the concerned authorities.
5.2.6) VERIFICATION
Verification of the individual monitoring reports will be done by PIOS with use of its field branches and
the team of experts participating in the Monitoring Program. PIOS will establish a system of verification
procedures which should be applied once a year to all the projects and for some, at random.
PIOS will prepare for the Ministry of Environmental Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry a report on
verification of each individual project and the GEF Program in as entirety.
The Secretariat-JI will send the above mentioned reports to the World Bank, the Norwegian Government and
the UNFCCC - Secretariat.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
B.1) Letters of endorsement will be sent accordingly.
B. 2) This report is a joint report:
X Yes, this project has been endorsed by the following parties: the Polish Ministry of Environmental
Protection, Natural Resources and Forestry and the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, signed on 30
September 1993.
B. 3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
The items of the report describing the project, its implementation and its effects, have been completed by
the Government of Poland. The investor specific items have been completed by the Government of Norway. The
World Bank, as the project administrator, has provided assistance and advice in the preparation of the
joint report.
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio-economic and
environmental priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national
economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies.
|
|
Poland seeks energy security through stable energy deliveries at socially acceptable prices and
with a minimal damage to the environment. Among the priority actions are to diversify the primary
energy supplies and to comply with international environmental agreements to reduce air pollution
and greenhouse gas emissions. This project is designed to be fully-integrated and consistent with
the goals and development strategies of the government of Poland.
AIR PROTECTION
This is based on:
- the "Implementation Program of the National Environmental Policy till the year to
2000",
- voivodeship lists of priority projects regarding environmental protection for 1997,
- and proposals submitted by the Minister of EPNR&F.
The aim of the undertakings concerning the air pollution control is to achieve reductions of
pollutant emissions into the atmospheric air by both improving the fuel quality parameters and
replacing fuel, by installing equipment that reduces the flue gas emissions of pollutants, by
modernising and replacing technologies and by conserving energy.
1) Directions:
- Support for the undertakings leading to reductions of the emissions into the atmospheric air of
gas and particulate pollutants, by means of the modernisation and upgrading of the fuel production
and burning technologies.
- Support for the undertakings related to the rationalisation of heat systems, including the
recovery of heat, national production of highly efficient heating equipment, combined with the use
of unconventional energy sources.
2) Selection criteria for projects in the field of air protection
- elimination of low-stack emissions;
- supporting projects connected with the construction of systems supplying gas and district
heating to spas, tourist destinations and protected areas;
- improving heating efficiency, especially linked to the elimination of household stoves and
existing local boilers with low efficiency and poor technical condition through a comprehensive
modification of heating systems;
- control of gaseous and ash emissions from power generation and large hard and (lignite) brown
coal-fired energy cogeneration plants, especially having an impact on Poland's international
commitments;
- improving energy efficiency;
- modification of industrial processes in order to improve energy efficiency and reduce harmful
emissions;
- promoting non - conventional energy source projects;
- supporting modern technical solutions limiting the environmental impact of and transport, in
particular city transport, in the context of exhaust fumes, noise and vibration emissions including
support in equipping monitoring services;
- controlling non-ionising electromagnetic radiation.
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
Anticipated global benefits of the total project include a 65 % reduction in CO2
emissions by converting small coal fired boilers to gas firing, and a 28 % CO2 reduction
by increasing efficiency in new residential buildings. Local benefits include virtual elimination
of sulphur dioxide (SO2) and particulates and significant reduction in nitrogen oxides
(NOx) emitted by the converted boilers.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
Yes
Planned environmental benefits:
141 698 tCO2/year (concerning 12 projects); 3 259 tCO2/year (concerning the
AIJ component of the project or 2.3% of total planned environmental benefits).
|
|
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:
|
Implementation of the pilot activities will have a positive impact on local air quality and will
contribute on an incremental basis to improved air quality regionally; especially will improve
ambient air quality in the historic urban centres, that represent national heritage.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?
|
no
|
|
Describe economic benefits in detail:
|
The overall attractiveness of the total program investment (involving investments at perhaps 40
separate sites) can only be estimated by taking the Krakow pilot projects as representative.
Analyses show that the conversion to gas using higher efficiency technology is not financially
viable. The Internal Rates of Return (IRR) in two cases are negative. To achieve the boiler
owner's assumed 25 percent target IRR, the grant finance requirement is about 34 percent (or
USD 130,000) and 60% (or USD 2.94 million) of the individual project costs at Jana Street (USD
385,000) and Warszawska Street (USD 4.86 million), respectively.
The energy efficiency and conservation measures were assumed to apply to both the with project and
reference cases. The investment costs for these improvements can be financially justified by: (a)
the reduction in the investment cost for new boilers, since the capacity of the replaced boiler is
downsized; and (b) the reduction in annual fuel and maintenance cost. At Jana Street, the payback
period for these improvements would be four years, equivalent to a rate of return of 23 percent; at
the Polytechnic University, the payback period would be three years, equivalent to rate of 34
percent.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?
|
Yes
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real,
measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not
have occurred in the absence of such activities
The project cost-effectiveness expressed in the size of the grant per ton of CO2 equivalents is
for the typical high efficiency gas-fired boiler between 11 and 43 USD, while the cost of avoided emissions
from a condensing boiler would be about 60 USD. For the housing projects, the costs would seem to vary
between 90 and 120 USD per ton of CO2 equivalents. As new practices and energy saving equipment
become more common in Poland, prices are expected to drop considerably and thus help fulfil the objective
of the project more cost-effectively.
Uncontrolled emissions from black coal mines in Poland are assumed to average 20-25 m3 per ton
of coal produced. The advantage of reduced emissions of methane from coal mining is not included in the
calculations of emission benefits. Also the lifetime of the new gas-fired boilers has in the calculation of
emission benefits conservatively been estimated to last for 17 years.
E. 1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:
In the absence of the total project, reengineering and replacement of existing coal fired boilers only at
the end of their service life would be the most common choice of boiler owners due to a low investment
price and the familiarity with coal technology. A shift to new coal fired boilers was chosen as the
baseline knowing that this is a conservative choice for calculating the probable emission saving. The
abatement effect is thus the difference in emissions between new coal-fired boilers and new gas-fired
boilers.
E. 2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:
For both the reference case and the „with project" cases, CO2 emissions were
estimated based on: (a) annual heat demand (which is the same for the with project and reference cases);
(b) efficiency of heat supply facilities (coal-fired boilers, gas-fired condensing boilers or cogeneration
units); (c) unit emission factors for gas, LFO and coal; (d) share of heat produced by the cogeneration
unit and the peak boilers. Additional CO2 emission credits were attributed to the cogeneration
units, resulting from the displacement of the electricity now generated from coal in the national power
system at 34 percent efficiency.
Fill in the following tables as applicable:
E.2.1) Summary table: Projected emissions reductions:
|
GHG
|
Year 1
Total Project
|
Year 1
AIJ Component
|
Year 2
|
..
|
Year X
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
141698*
|
3,2592
|
|
|
|
|
[t]
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
* concerning 12 projects
2 concerning the AIJ component of the project (2.3% of total planned environmental
benefits).
E.2.2) Summary table: Actual emissions reductions:
|
GHG
|
Year 1
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year X
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity dataa)
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
F. Bearing in mind that the financing of activities implemented jointly shall be additional to financial
obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial
mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows, please indicate
|
Source of project funding
including pre-feasibility stage
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(converted to US dollars)
|
|
Government of Norway1
|
1.1 mill USD
|
|
GEF
|
25 mill USD
|
|
Poland (NFEP&WM, VFEP&WM, BOS, owner's contribution)
|
22 mill USD
|
1The contribution of the Government of Norway is provided from a separate budget line, the
Norwegian Climate Fund, which has been established separate from, and in addition to, the development
assistance accounts and will not be reported as part of Norway's ODA. This contribution is provided in
addition to meet Norway's financial commitments under UNFCCC.
The Norwegian co-financing was provided in addition to the Norwegian contribution to the GEF in 1993. The
availability of extra Norwegian co-financing served to expand the project scope beyond what would have been
undertaken in the absence of this funding. Specifically, the extra Norwegian resources resulted in an
increase in the targeted number of boiler installations to be converted by the project. In effect, the
Norwegian co-financing is covering the non-GEF financed portion of the (expanded) total incremental cost
financing requirement and is additional to the financial obligations under the Convention and to regular
development financing. The Norwegian government is not seeking emission credits from its investment in the
project.
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to
other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the
Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of
endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties.
Describe briefly the transfer of environmenally sound technology and know-how including where appropriate
the type of technology, terms, education, capacity building, etc.
The introduction of improved technologies would facilitate the Government's efforts to pursue its
environmental priorities and standards aggressively and to take full advantage of the macroeconomic
conditions and other incentives that induce energy efficiency and conservation.
With largely decontrolled coal prices, a proper gas pricing policy, rising labour costs, and proper set-up
and enforcement of environmental fees and fines that reflect the true costs of environmental damage,
coal-to-gas conversion would become a financially attractive and self supporting option. The activity could
be made more self-sustaining if support were provided to develop an independent power market based on small
gas-fired cogeneration systems, high-efficiency boilers and advanced energy-efficient building equipment -
insulation, glazing, lighting and appliances - that are widely available.
The scope for using innovative technologies such as high-efficiency gas-fired boilers and packaged
gas-fired cogeneration units and for integrating improvements in heat energy supply, distribution, and
transfer systems and in end-use efficiency in buildings to improve the cost- effectiveness of the abatement
of CO2 emissions needs to be demonstrated through pilot investments. Although the technologies
are well-established, their development in Poland and in other Central and Eastern European countries has
so far been limited.
The present activity is designed as a catalyst to stimulate self-replicable technological and institutional
changes that would promote coal-to-gas conversion in small and medium-size boilers and induce more
energy-efficient practices in the architectural design and operation of new residential buildings. The
techniques, once successfully demonstrated in Poland, are replicable in the large number of
coal-dependent/intensive transition economies that have access to gas supplies.
Institutional Strengthening. The proposed project would contribute to a strengthening of Poland's
capacity, at the national and local levels and in the areas selected for project-supported conversion
activities, to: (a) plan and implement, on a national basis, the innovative and cost-effective types of
environmental improvement activities being supported under the proposed project; (b) develop experience
with the design, installation and operation of interventions to improve the heat supply system; (c) create
an institutional capability to assess global externalities such as CO2 emission abatement in
project analyses; and (d) improve the implementation of public awareness programs for energy efficiency and
conservation.
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties,
effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered
Fill in as appropriate:
H. 1) Any practical experience gained:
1) MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM EXECUTION
a) Information concerning STAP performance:
- a working meeting of all STAP members took place between 26 - 29 August 1996. STAP members reviewed 25
applications for funding aimed at boiler houses modernisation. 15 applications were approved for
Implementation (including 12 high efficiency boilers and 3 cogenerations). The report was made and
submitted to BOS and MoE,
- the report of energy auditor relating to energy efficiency improvement in new residential buildings was
approved by 3 STAP members (1 foreign among them), within the framework of the energy efficiency for new
residential buildings component.
b) Description of consulting services and contractors:
- a contract with consultant for preparation of TOR for energy auditor has been concluded,
- TAG members have been asked to give their opinion on funds allocation (27 applications) aimed at boiler
houses modernisation,
- energy auditor has been chosen - the National Energy Conservation Agency (NECA) and contract with this
firm has been signed within the framework of the energy efficiency for new residential buildings component,
- a bidding documents have been prepared and 5 firms have been chosen (agreed with the World Bank) and
these firms have been asked to submit their offer for boiler owner representative.
c) Description of the marketing plan implementation:
- organisational entities of BOS were dealing with marketing under the current activity of central and
regional bank's entities using previously prepared leaflets informing about this project, and contacts
with environmental protection departments of Voivodeship Authorities and the National Fund of Environmental
Protection.
d) The environmental monitoring program accomplishment:
- MoE has prepared the environmental monitoring program (approved by the World Bank),
- all activities concerned with bidding procedure to select a company responsible for technical and
environmental monitoring of the boilers have been commenced by the GEF Project Office.
e) Training program implementation:
- training of specialists under the GEF project did not take place,
- the employees of GEF project office BOS have been providing the bank branch workers, local experts and
TAG members with up-to-date information.
f) Characteristics of the management system:
- Minister has assigned his plenipotentiary and an Economic Department to supervise the implementation of
the GEF Project instead of Ecological Policy Department. GEF Project is implemented under the existing BOS
structure which consists of the GEF project office in the headquarters and the local branches of the Bank.
2) EXPENDITURES AND FUNDS OF THE PROGRAM
- Use of resources for the total project
|
Category
|
At the end of the reporting period 1.06 - 30.11.96
|
Cumulative
|
Percentage
|
|
A. Coal-to-gas conversion:
- cogeneration systems
- high efficiency boilers
- energy efficiency e.g. for new buildings
|
|
|
|
|
B. Contractual services
|
|
624.28
|
0.42
|
|
C. Technical assistance
- BOS management fee
- STAP fee
- energy auditing services
- financial auditing services
- training and consulting services
|
14 651.69
6 241.15
|
55 000.00
29 262.72
27 162.10
|
8.87
15.40
1.23
|
- Short description of expenditures (goods, materials and civil works, contractual services, technical
assistance, concluded contracts, opened letters of credit - committed sources):
A contract between MPEC and BOS concerning modernisation of the boiler house in Cracow, at Œw. Jana
street has been signed under the pilot project. A turn key bidding invitation has been published.
H. 2) Technical difficulties:
Organisational and investment problems arose:
- an execution of the pilot project at the Polytechnic University in Cracow is under threat. It is
impossible to publish an invitation for a bid aimed at an investment realisation due to the insufficient
financial resources supplementary to the grants (the National Fund was unable to determine whether it could
allocate its financial resources to the project).
- preliminary valuation shows that providing small boiler houses (below 1.0 MW) with the grants is
uneconomical from the National Fund's effectiveness point of view (costs of servicing per each
individual project - e.g. hiring the boiler owner representative are higher than the granted amount).
Additionally, the complex and time-consuming procedure is troublesome to an investor who has to operate
with domestic inflation still running high, and grant's value is small. Due to this fact, 2
applications approved by STAP would probably not be effected.
- the complex and time- consuming procedure resulted in the resignation of prevailing part of the boiler
owners from GEF grant approved by STAP.
- modernisation of any boiler house is impossible in 1997 without an efficient reconciliation system of
the needed documents between the World Bank and the Polish partner and without taking into account the
specific of the Polish economy. The prompt selection of the firm which would carry out the environment
monitoring is also essential in order to conduct a modernisation of any boiler house in 1997.
H. 3) Negative impacts and/or effects encountered:
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantitative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental negative impacts/effects?
|
no
|
|
Describe social/cultural negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social negative impacts/effects?
|
no
|
|
Describe economic negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic negative impacts/effects?
|
no
|
H. 4) Other obstacles encountered: n/a
H. 5) Other: n/a
Appendix I
Descriptions of 12 Individual Projects
Project nr. 1
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
CHP at Polytechnic University of Cracow
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Cracow
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (after balancing of funds)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Cogeneration unit:
gas engines 2x1.2 MWe,
gas boilers 9.35 MWt with heat accumulator
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 60%
NF and VF - no confirmation
|
|
2. Project costs
|
5891 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
before turn-key bidding invitation
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
43.6 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
18 638 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 2
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB at Sw. Jana street in Cracow
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Cracow
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
1 condensing boiler 0.55 MWt
2 high efficiency boilers 2x0.55 MWt; total 1.65 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 37%
owner's contribution (Oc) - 63%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
394 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
turn-key bidding invitation has been published
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
29.3 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
2551 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 3
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
CHP in hospital in Piekary Slaskie
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Piekary Slaskie
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Cogeneration unit:
gas engine 1.5 MWe, 1.5 MWt,
gas boiler 2.8 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 46%, Oc - 5%, VF - 24%, NF - 25%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
3668 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
27.9 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
10 782 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 4
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Boilers in two hospitals in Siemianowice Slaskie
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Siemianowice Slaskie
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
condensing boilers 6.4 MWt (4x1.6 MWt)
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 56%, Oc - 19%, VF and NF - 25%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
2028 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
58.9 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
8650 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 5
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in Raszyn Falenty IMUZ
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Raszyn Falenty
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
gas boilers 3.0 MWt (2x1.5 MWt)
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 29%, OC - 16%, VF - 27%, NF - 28%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
474 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
19.2 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
5120 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 6
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in hospital in Piotrkow Trybunalski
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Piotrkow Trybunalski
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
gas boilers 4.2 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 54%, Oc - 10%, VF -36%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
1123 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
43.0 US/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
3428 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 7
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
CHP MPEC in Wloclawek
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Wloclawek
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Cogeneration unit:
gas turbine 5.0 MWe, 10.0 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 58%, Oc - 15%, NF - 23%,
communal budget - 4%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
10539 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
26.4 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
34750 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 8
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in Wroclaw
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Wroclaw
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
gas boilers 2.87 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 47%, Oc - 27%, other - 26%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
705 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
34.1 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
1940 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 9
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
CHP in Swiebodzice
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Swiebodzice
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Cogeneration unit:
gas turbine 4.6 MWe, 6.8 Mwt,
gas boilers 3.5 MW
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 66%, other - 34%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
8541 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
32.2 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
37823 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 10
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB in hospital in Ciechanow
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Ciechanow
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
gas boilers 6.0 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 57%, other - 43%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
739 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
10.9 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
8659 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 11
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB PEC in Rawa Mazowiecka "Zamkowa Wola"
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Rawa Mazowiecka
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
gas boilers 7.0 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 42%, Oc - 20%, other - 38%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
978 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
17.8 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
7571 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
Project nr. 12
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
HOB PEC in Poznan
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Coal-to-gas conversion
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region, state):
|
Poznan
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1997 (estimated)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1998 (estimated)
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Mutually agreed / in progress / completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
17 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
gas boilers 2.5 MWt
|
|
1. Financing plan
|
GEF - 29%, other - 71%
|
|
2. Project costs
|
372 000 USD
|
|
3. Accomplishment of:
- orders
- expenditures
|
|
|
4. Project Implementation performance
|
|
|
5. Project cost-effectiveness
|
17.3 USD/tCO2*
|
|
6. Planned environmental benefits
|
1786 tCO2/year
|
* grant economic effectiveness indicator according to Word Bank financial-economic model.
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
