UNIFORM REPORTING FORMAT:
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY
UNDER THE PILOT PHASE
UNIFORM REPORTING FORMAT:
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY UNDER THE PILOT PHASE
The uniform reporting format contained below is to be used in reporting on activities implemented jointly
under the pilot phase. It is noted that the reporting should be consistent with decision 5/CP.1 and 8/CP.2
(reproduced in annexes I and II to this reporting format). The SBSTA notes that the uniform reporting
format could possibly require revision in the light of experience gained and methodological work conducted
under the pilot phase.
List of
Projects
A. Description of project
A. 1) Title of project:
PILOT PROJECT JOINT IMPLEMENTATION SANITARY LANDFILLING WITH ENERGY RECOVERY IN MOSCOW REGION
A. 2) Participants/actors:
Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item
AFunction within activity".
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Grontmij Advies & Techniek bv
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Grontmij Consulting Engineers
|
|
Department:
|
Process and Environmental Engineering
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Consultant
|
|
Street:
|
De Holle Bilt 2
PO Box 203
|
|
Post code:
|
3730 AE
|
|
City:
|
De Bilt
|
|
Country:
|
The Netherlands
|
|
Telephone:
|
+31 30 220 7911
|
|
Fax:
|
+31 30 221 0730
|
|
E-mail:
|
gmpi@knoware.nl
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Luning
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Luchien
|
|
Job title:
|
Senior consultant
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+31 30 220 7373
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+31 30 221 0730
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
gmpi@knoware.nl
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Geopolis
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Geopolis Consulting Engineers
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Consultant
|
|
Street:
|
Ul. Shipilovskaja 64-1-290
|
|
Post code:
|
115682
|
|
City:
|
Moscow
|
|
Country:
|
Russian Federation
|
|
Telephone:
|
+7 095 396 0222
|
|
Fax:
|
+7 095 396 0222
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Gurvich
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Wladimir
|
|
Job title:
|
Deputy director
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+7 095 396 0222
|
|
Direct fax:
|
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
a) Organization includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organizations,
etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government
agency closely following the activity.
A. 3) Activity:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
The project mitigates methane emissions from landfills by extraction, flaring and utilizing
landfill gas. The gas would otherwise be emitted directly into the atmosphere. To this end
extraction equipment, interconnecting pipework and a compressor station have been installed.
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
fugitive gas capture
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region,
state):
|
1: Landfill Daskovka, Serpuchov district, Moscow
2: Landfill Kargashino, Mytishi district, Moscow
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1994
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1997
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
in progress
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
10 years
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
From waste amounts and age of waste the potential ladfill gas production (at present and in the
future) was calculated. With the extraction equipment the extracted amounts and quality of the gas
are registered. With these data the reduction in emission of methane is calculated. In addition
landfill gas will be utilized for electricity production. These quantities will be registered
separately by gas and kWh meters.
|
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
A. 4) Cost (to the extent possible):
Landfill Serpuchov
|
Item
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year 10
|
|
Cost of the project in US$:
|
619,000
|
-23,600
|
|
-23,600
|
|
AIJ component in US$:
|
393,000
|
|
|
|
|
US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:
|
|
|
|
5.65
|
Landfill Mytishi
|
Item
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year 10
|
|
Cost of the project in US$:
|
619,000
|
-62,100
|
|
-62,100
|
|
AIJ component in US$:
|
393,000
|
|
|
|
|
US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:
|
|
|
|
-0.01
|
Describe briefly how costs are determined:
After installation of extraction equipment some revenues are collected. Costs per avoided ton of
CH4 are calculated as an accumulated estimate by determining total costs (minus revenues) over a
period of 10 years and the total amount of methane extracted during this period. The conversion into costs
per ton COx equivalent is based upon the lastest IPCC estimates for the direct global warming
potential for CH4.
A. 5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involved):
|
|
Geopolis, the Russian counterpart, is responsible for registration and collection of extraction
data from metering and monitoring equipment installed at both landfills. The collected data consist
of amounts of gas extracted and flared (in m3) and the methane content of the gas.
Additionally, the quantities of gas used for electricity production will be registered (in
m3) and the amount of electricity produced (measured in kWh).
At two times during the monitoring period a determination of the remaining gas emissions will take
place. This is done by measuring gas flow and gas concentrations in the covering layer of the
landfill. By using a large number of points the overall emission can be calculated. The first
measurement refers to the baseline situation. The second to the situation with gas extraction in
operation.
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations mentioned is reported
under
section A.2 above.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance,
approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be
shown as follows:
(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one
participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached
letters issued by the relevant national authorities;
(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national
authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been
received from all participating Parties.
B. 1) For the activity:
* First report and joint reporting: please add copies of letters of endorsement by each designated national
authority of Parties involved in the activity.
* Subsequent reports:_
Activity was:
_ suspended
_ terminated earlier
Describe:
B. 2) This report is a joint report:
_ Yes, forward copy of agreement/endorsement by the
designated national authorities involved
_ No
B. 3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio-economic and
environment priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national
economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies
|
|
The project contributes to the national and regional willing in raising waste managment practices
to a higher level. Both projects may set an example for other landfills in the Russian Federation,
where landfilling is one of the most important ways of waste disposal at this moment.
Furthermore, the projects create local environmental benefits by a reduction in odour emission at
both landfills and (small) economic benefits by the sale of electricity produced.
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
Extraction reduces fugitive methane emissions into the atmosphere. Furthermore, odour emissions are
reduced and safety conditons are improved
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
Yes
|
|
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:
|
Not relevant
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?
|
No
|
|
Describe economic benefits in detail:
|
Revenues are collected directly from the sale of electricity produced at both landfills or
indirectly from avoided electricity consumption
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?
|
Yes
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real,
measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not
have occurred in the absence of such activities
E. 1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:
Landfilling is one of the most important ways of waste disposal in Russia at this moment. The projects in
Serpuchov and Mytishi are the first gas extraction projects in Russia. If the projects would not have been
implemented, free emissions into the atmosphere from landfills would still occur for at least the
evaluation period of 10 years.
The baseline is formed by the prognosis for the degradation of organic material or the gas production of a
landfill site. For this prognosis the tipping data (amount of wastes disposed in time, types of waste, age
and geometry of the landfill site) are combined with known and experience data from literature and other
projects to calculate the typical gas production of a landfill site.
In addition a determination of the quantity of gas is performed at two times during the monitoring period.
First to establish the baseline; the second measurement to estimate the effect of the project.
E. 2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:
Baseline calculations are combined with experience data of extraction efficiencies. This information gives
insight in the possibilities for gas extraction and emission reduction. Conversions of methane emission
reductions into CO2 emissions are carried out using global warming potentials as reported by
IPCC. The basis for this is formed by the registered quantities and concentrations of gas extracted.
Fill in the following tables as applicable:
E.2.1) Summary table: Projected emission reductions:
Landfill Mytishi (in ton per year)
|
GHG
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year X
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
0
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
CH4
|
1,122
|
1,404
|
|
3,922
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
-500
|
-500
|
|
-500
|
|
CH4
|
630
|
940
|
|
2,012
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
-500
|
-500
|
|
-500
|
|
CH4
|
-492
|
-464
|
|
-1920
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
-500
|
-1000
|
|
-4800
|
|
CH4
|
-492
|
-956
|
|
-8814
|
Landfill Serpuhov (in ton per year)
|
GHG
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year X
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
0
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
CH4
|
853
|
853
|
|
412
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
-250
|
-250
|
|
-250
|
|
CH4
|
630
|
940
|
|
2,012
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
-250
|
-250
|
|
-250
|
|
CH4
|
-383
|
-418
|
|
-202
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
-250
|
-500
|
|
-2500
|
|
CH4
|
-383
|
-801
|
|
-2994
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
E.2.2) Summary table: Actual emission reductions: NOT YET AVAILABLE
|
GHG
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year X
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity dataa)
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
|
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
F. Bearing in mind that the financing of activities implemented jointly shall be additional to financial
obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial
mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows, please indicate
|
Source of project funding
including pre-feasibility phase
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(US dollars)
|
|
Netherlands Government
|
786,000
|
|
Local Government
|
750,000
|
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to
other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the
Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of
endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties
Describe briefly the transfer of environmenally sound technology and know-how including where appropriate
the type of technology, terms, education, capactity building etc.
Know-how on emission reduction technology and extraction and monitoring equipment have been transferred.
Capacity building was created by training of personnel on site, joint workshops in the Netherlands and in
Russia and by supervision and monitoring of the projects.
Apart from a direct relationship with the emission reduction of greenhouse gases by extracting landfill
gas, the quality of waste disposal and awareness of environmental consequences have been raised.
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties,
effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered
Fill in as appropriate:
H. 1) Any practical experience gained:
H. 2) Technical difficulties:
H. 3) negative impacts and/or effects encountered:
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
Not to be expected
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental negative impacts/effects?
|
Yes/no
|
|
Describe social/cultural negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
Not to be expected
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social negative impacts/effects?
|
Yes/no
|
|
Describe economic negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
Not to be expected
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic negative impacts/effects?
|
Yes/no
|
H. 4) Other obstacles encountered:
H. 5) Other:
