Your location: Home

ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY (AIJ)
 
Annex I
UNIFORM REPORTING FORMAT:

ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY UNDER THE PILOT PHASE

List of Projects

A. Description of project

1) Title of project:

Janmuiza Boiler Conversion

2) Participants/actors:

Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item Function within activity".

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organization(a):

Närings- och Teknikutvecklingsverket

Name of organization (English):

Swedish National Board for Industrial and Technical Development

Department:

Environmental Energy System in the Baltic Region and Eastern Europe.

Acronym:

NUTEK

Acronym (English):

NUTEK

Function within activity:

Assigned by the Swedish Government for Implementation including financing arrangements.

Street:

Liljeholmsvägen 32

Post code:

S-117 86

City:

Stockholm

Country:

Sweden

Telephone:

+46-8-681 96 07

Fax:

+46-8-681 96 67

E-mail:

gudrun.knutsson@nutek.se

WWW-URL:

http://www.nutek.se

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

Surname:

Liib

First name, middle name:

Aili

Job title:

Direct tel:

+46-8-681 96 72

Direct fax:

+46-8-681 96 67

Direct E-mail:

aili.liib@nutek.se

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organization(a):

Name of organization (English):

Janmuiza Agricultural School

Department:

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function within activity:

Plant owner

Street:

Janmuiza

Post code:

City:

Cesu District

Country:

LATVIA

Telephone:

+371-(2)41 224 73

Fax:

+371-(2)41 543 91

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

Surname:

Abolkalns

First name, middle name:

Ojars

Job title:

Direct tel:

+371-(2)41 542 10

Direct fax:

+371-(2)41 543 91

Direct E-mail:

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organization(a):

Name of organization (English):

Riga Technical University

Department:

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function within activity:

Project evaluator

Street:

Zentenes Street 12-49

Post code:

City:

Riga

Country:

LATVIA

Telephone:

Fax:

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

Surname:

Blumberga

First name, middle name:

Dagnija

Job title:

Professor

Direct tel:

+371-2-41 98 53 (home)

Direct fax:

+371-2-41 98 53 (home)

Direct E-mail:

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organization(a):

ÅF Energikonsult Syd AB

Name of organization (English):

Department:

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function within activity:

Technical Support

Street:

Stensjögatan 3

Post code:

S- 217 65

City:

MALMÖ

Country:

SWEDEN

Telephone:

+46-40-37 50 00

Fax:

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

Surname:

Mårtensson

First name, middle name:

Roland

Job title:

Direct tel:

+46-40-37 51 03

Direct fax:

+46-40-13 03 69

Direct E-mail:

roland.martensson@ens.af.se

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organization(a):

Latvian organisation for follow-up of climate effects.

Name of organization (English):

Department:

Acronym:

Acronym (English):

Function within activity:

(standard classifiers to be developed)

Street:

Post code:

City:

Country:

LATVIA

Telephone:

Fax:

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

-------------------------------------

Surname:

First name, middle name:

Job title:

Direct tel:

Direct fax:

Direct E-mail:

a) Organization includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organizations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

3) Activity:

Item

Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Janmuiza agricultural school is situated in Cesis district. All buildings in this place get their heat from a small light oil fired boilerplant. The annual energy production is about 15000 MWh.

Type of project:a)

conversion to renewable energy

Location (exact, e.g. city, region,

state):

Janmuiza village

Cesis district

LATVIA

Activity starting date:

19. January 1994 (letter-of-intent)

Expected activity ending date:

30. September 2004

Stage of activity:b)

Complete

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

Technical data:d)

In the heating plant a new boiler with a prefurnace has been installed. Automatic fuel storage, wood chipper and flue gas cleaning are also included in the project. The new boiler has an output power of 3 MW and is estimated to produce around

12 000 MWh annually.

a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.

b) Circle the appropriate option.

c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.

d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data requirements are.

4) Cost (to the extent possible):

Item

Year 0

= 1994

Year 1

= 1995

Year 2

= 1996

Year

3 -9

Year 10

Cost of the project in US$:

603761

AIJ component in US$:

603761

6.700

6.700

US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:

15,8

20,3

23,1

Describe briefly how costs are determined:

The investment proper is calculated to be 532.147 USD and technical support 71.614 USD.

The lifetime or the project is foreseen to be minimum 10 years (corresponding to the maturity period of the loan). The reference scenario is a status quo situation, assuming that no invest-ment would have been made for the replaced technology. The following definitions are used:

Cost for the project in year 0:

Costs for investment (= loan from NUTEK) and technical assistance (= grant from NUTEK) are summarized over the investment period (up to the time for commissioning) and stated for year 0, being the year of the date for commissioning.

Cost for the project in consequtive years:

Costs (i e possible costs for investment and costs of AIJ component character) are shown per calender year. Year 1 represents part of the calender year after the date of commissioning.

AIJ component in year 0:

The costs for technical assistance up to commissioning have a clear character of AIJ component. The costs for the investment can also be maintained to have the an AIJ character, as the loan is a cost for the host country, and as the loan represents a business risk for the financier, NUTEK.

AIJ component in consequtive years:

Encompasses in this report only one cost item - Costs for follow-up after the date of commissioning (information exchange to secure a high utilisation of the investment + costs for measuring and reporting to FCCC). The cost for follow-up for the years up to and including 1996 is calculated by dividing NUTEKs total costs for follow-up by the total years of operation of all NUTEK-financed projects.

Other cost items, like difference between a market interest rate and the favourable interest rate (STIBOR) which NUTEK applies and financial risk, may be considered at the next reporting occasion.

US $ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent equals:

- at year 0 the cost of the project/AIJ component cost divided by the projected decrease in CO2 emission over the 10 year lifetime of the project

- for consequtive years the cost of the project/AIJ component divided by actual figure for decrease of CO2 emission for each of the years 1 - 10.

5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:

Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involveda):

It is intended that upon agreement with a central Estonian authority on reporting of JI-projects, this authority will assign a local organisation, which will be involved in the evaluation of the climate effects of this project. After an initial work in cooperation with NUTEKís assigned consultant, this local organisation will take the main responsibility the continued measuring for JI-reporting.

a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations mentioned is reported under

section A.2 above.

B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement

Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance, approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be shown as follows:

(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached letters issued by the relevant national authorities;

(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been received from all participating Parties.

1) For the activity:

* First report and joint reporting

2) This report is a joint report:

Yes,

3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:

Cf. Annex II, section B

C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio economic and environment priorities and strategies

Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national economic development and socio economic and environment priorities and strategies

The project meets with a o the following objectives in the Government Policy of the Republic of Latvia:

- priority to a o projects with use of local energy sources

-saving and efficient use of energy is in the focus of govenment attention. Special attention is paid to measuring, records and statistics of energy production and consumption.

- reduction of the volume of pollutant emissions and residues will be carried out gradually and purposefully with regard to the existing technological level of energy utilities and the actual economical possibilities.

D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project

Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of quantative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)

Item

Please fill in

Describe environmental benefits in detail:

Annual emissions reduction:

3800 ton CO2

30 ton SO2

2.1 ton NOx

Boiler plant is firing sawmill waste wich earlier was deposited in forest

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?

No.

Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:

More stable energy supply.

Improved working conditions, increased motivation

Improved trade balance.

Lower energy price to inhabitants

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?

No.

Describe economic benefits in detail:

Decreased fuel costs approx. 4 USD/MWh.

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?

No.

E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real, measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not have occurred in the absence of such activities

1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):

Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:

The reference scenario represents at status quo situation. The decrease in energy consumption that followed after 1990 is assumed to have reached full impact, meaning a stable heat consumption over the life-time of the project. Loan from NUTEK is so far one of the very few sources to finance this type of investments for municipalities in Latvia. As this would imply that an alternative investment would not have taken place, neither the consequence of another investment, nor the consequence of an alternative technical solutions are considered.î

2) Estimated emissions with the activity:

Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:

Cf. E.1. above.

Fill in the following tables as applicable:

Summary table: Projected emission reductions:

GHG

Year 1

= 1995

Year 2

1996

...

Year 10

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

3800

3800

3800

CH4

-

-

N2O

-

-

other

-

-

B) Project activity scenarioa)

CO2

0

0

0

CH4

-

-

N2O

-

-

other

-

-

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

-3800

-3800

-3800

CH4

-

-

N2O

-

-

Other

-

-

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

-3800

-7600

-38000

CH4

-

-

N2O

-

-

Other

-

-

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

Summary table: Actual emission reductions:

GHG

Year 1

= 1995

Year 2

= 1996

...

Year X

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

3300

2900

CH4

-

-

N2O

-

-

other

-

-

B) Project activity scenarioa)

CO2

0

0

CH4

-

-

N2O

-

-

other

-

-

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

-3300

-2900

CH4

-

-

N2O

-

-

Other

-

-

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

3300

6200

CH4

-

-

N2O

-

-

Other

-

-

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

F. Additionality to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows

Please indicate all sources of project funding.

Category of funding

(For each source one line)

Amount

(US dollars)

Loan from NUTEK

532147 USD

Grant from NUTEK for technical assistance

71614 USD

1 USD = 7.50 SEK

G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties

Transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how

Describe briefly

Schematically, the transfer of knowledge involves the following activities over time:

i) Technology transfer through NUTEKs technical specialist during the implementation of the project.

ii) Technology transfer through cooperation between foreign supplier and local partner

iii) Conferences, seminars, documentation and training.

iv) Stimulate înet-workingî for the exchange or experience between plant owners with similar problems, e g îbio-clubsî.

technology transfer has taken place through

i) NUTEKs technical specialist support to the local project leader and municipality.

iii) personal from boilerplant has been invited to different seminars and work-shops, documentation for training has been handed over

As a agriculture school they will use the knowledge about bio-fuel technic for training.

iv) Boilerplant is active in îbio-clubî .

Endogenous capacity supported or enhanced:

Endogenous capacity

(Name of organization1)

Development (DEV) /

enhancement (ENH)

Describe briefly

Janmuiza agricultural school

(ENH)

Several NUTEKís seminars and local seminars has been hold at scool

Local project manager has been used as local consultant in other NUTEKís project. He has also been project leader for project with other financing.

1) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations listed is reported under section A.2 above.

H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties, effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered

Fill in as appropriate:

1) Any practical experience gained:

2) Technical difficulties:

3) Effects encountered:

4) Impacts encountered:

5) Other obstacles encountered:

6) Other:






Will be dealt with at next reporting occasion