Annex I
UNIFORM REPORTING FORMAT:
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY UNDER THE PILOT PHASE
List of
Projects
A. Description of project
1) Title of project:
Kazlu Ruda Boiler Conversion
2) Participants/actors:
Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item Function
within activity".
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Statens energimyndighet
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Swedish National Energy Administration
|
|
Department:
|
EAES - Environmentally Adapted Energy System in the Baltic Region and Eastern Europe.
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Assigned by the Swedish Government for Implementation including financing arrangements.
|
|
Street:
|
Liljeholmsvägen 32
|
|
Post code:
|
S-117 86
|
|
City:
|
Stockholm
|
|
Country:
|
Sweden
|
|
Telephone:
|
+46-8-681 96 07
|
|
Fax:
|
+46-8-681 96 67
|
|
E-mail:
|
gudrun.knutsson@stem.se
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.stem.se
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Liib
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Aili
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+46-8-681 96 72
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+46-8-681 96 67
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
aili.liib@stem.se
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Aplinkos apsaugos ministerija
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Environmental Protection Ministry
|
|
Department:
|
Environmental Quality
|
|
Acronym:
|
AAM
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
EPM
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Assigned by the Lithuanian Government for the Activities Implemented Jointly
|
|
Street:
|
A. Juozapaviciaus 9
|
|
Post code:
|
2600
|
|
City:
|
Vilius
|
|
Country:
|
LITHUANIA
|
|
Telephone:
|
+370-2 72 58 68
|
|
Fax:
|
+370-2 72 80 20
|
|
E-mail:
|
atm@nt.gamta.lt
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.gamta.lt
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Bilkis
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Mindaugas
|
|
Job title:
|
Director of Environmental Guality Dept.
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+370-2 72 27 48
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+370-2 72 80 20
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
atm@nt.gamta.lt
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Kazlu Rudos Metalas AB
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Plant owner
|
|
Street:
|
Daukanto 19
|
|
Post code:
|
LT 4500
|
|
City:
|
Kazlu Rusa
|
|
Country:
|
LITHUANIA
|
|
Telephone:
|
+370-43-250 38
|
|
Fax:
|
+370-43-250 55
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Daugiala
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Mecinslovas
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+370-43-250 38
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+370-43-250 55
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Lithuanian Energy Institute
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Project evaluator
|
|
Street:
|
Breslaujos 3
|
|
Post code:
|
LT 3035
|
|
City:
|
Kaunas
|
|
Country:
|
LITHUANIA
|
|
Telephone:
|
+370-7-75 34 95
|
|
Fax:
|
+370-7-75 12 71
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Pedisius
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Antanas
|
|
Job title:
|
Dr.
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+370-7-75 34 95
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+370-7-75 12 71
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
ÅF Energikonsult Syd AB
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Technical Support
|
|
Street:
|
Stensjögatan 3
|
|
Post code:
|
S- 217 65
|
|
City:
|
MALMÖ
|
|
Country:
|
SWEDEN
|
|
Telephone:
|
+46-40-37 50 00
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mårtensson
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Roland
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+46-40-37 51 03
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+46-40-13 03 69
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
roland.martensson@ens.af.se
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Lithuanian organisation for follow-up of climate effects.
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
(standard classifiers to be developed)
|
|
Street:
|
|
|
Post code:
|
|
|
City:
|
|
|
Country:
|
LITHUANIA
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel:
|
|
|
Direct fax:
|
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
a) Organization includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organizations, etc.
involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency
closely following the activity.
3) Activity:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Kazlu Ruda is a small town close to Kaunas with several boiler plants and district heating network.
One boilerplant is owned by the private company Kazlu Rudos Metalas. Besides deliveries to the
company's own buildings the plant supplies heat to the municipal district heating network.
There were three DKVR 6,5-13 oilfired boilers with annual energy production about 12000 MWh.
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
boiler conversion to renewable energy
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region,
state):
|
Kazlu Ruda town
Mariampole District
LITHUANIA
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
24. March 1994 (Letter of Intent)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
30. September 2004
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
Complete
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
Conversion of an oilfired DKVR 6.5-13 boiler to biofuels firing through installation of a
prefurnace. Automatic fuel storage and flue-gas cleaning are included in the project. The estimated
power output after conversion is 3MW, annual energy production 12 000 MWh.
|
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency;
renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation;
fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data
requirements are.
4) Cost (to the extent possible):
|
Item
|
Year 0
= 1995
|
Year 1
= 1995
|
Year 2
= 1996
|
Year
2 -9
|
Year 10
|
|
Cost of the project in US$:
|
400000
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIJ component in US$:
|
400000
|
6.700
|
6.700
|
|
|
|
US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:
|
9,09
|
33,52
|
24,88
|
|
|
Describe briefly how costs are determined:
The investment proper is calculated to be 335.000 USD and technical support 65.000 USD.
The lifetime or the project is foreseen to be minimum 10 years (corresponding to the maturity period of the
loan). The reference scenario is a status quo situation, assuming that no invest-ment would have been made
for the replaced technology. The following definitions are used:
Cost for the project in year 0:
Costs for investment (= loan from NUTEK) and technical assistance (= grant from NUTEK) are summarized over
the investment period (up to the time for commissioning) and stated for year 0, being the year of the date
for commissioning.
Cost for the project in consequtive years:
Costs (i e possible costs for investment and costs of AIJ component character) are shown per calender year.
Year 1 represents part of the calender year after the date of commissioning.
AIJ component in year 0:
The costs for technical assistance up to commissioning have a clear character of AIJ component. The costs
for the investment can also be maintained to have the an AIJ character, as the loan is a cost for the host
country, and as the loan represents a business risk for the financier, NUTEK.
AIJ component in consequtive years:
Encompasses in this report only one cost item - Costs for follow-up after the date of commissioning
(information exchange to secure a high utilisation of the investment + costs for measuring and reporting to
FCCC). The cost for follow-up for the years up to and including 1996 is calculated by dividing NUTEKs total
costs for follow-up by the total years of operation of all NUTEK-financed projects.
Other cost items, like difference between a market interest rate and the favourable interest rate (STIBOR)
which NUTEK applies and financial risk, may be considered at the next reporting occasion.
US $ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent equals:
- at year 0 the cost of the project/AIJ component cost divided by the projected decrease in CO2
emission over the 10 year lifetime of the project
- for consequtive years the cost of the project/AIJ component divided by actual figure for decrease of
CO2 emission for each of the years 1 - 10.
5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involveda):
|
|
It is intended that upon agreement with a central Estonian authority on reporting of JI-projects,
this authority will assign a local organisation, which will be involved in the evaluation of the
climate effects of this project. After an initial work in cooperation with NUTEKís assigned
consultant, this local organisation will take the main responsibility the continued measuring for
JI-reporting.
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations mentioned is reported under
section A.2 above.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance,
approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be
shown as follows:
(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one
participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached
letters issued by the relevant national authorities;
(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national
authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been
received from all participating Parties.
1) For the activity:
* First report and joint reporting
2) This report is a joint report:
Yes,
3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
Cf. Annex II, section B
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio economic and
environment priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national
economic development and socio economic and environment priorities and strategies
|
|
The project meets with a o the following objectives in the Lithuanian energy sector:
- to reduce the energy intensity
- to create and improve energy infrastructure based on indigenous energy resources
- to utilize the existing energy production capacity efficiently
- to develop cooperation between Baltic, Nordic and other Central European countries
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
Annual emissions reduction
4400 ton CO2
68 ton SO2
2.7 ton NOx
Sawmill waste will be used
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
Yes.
|
|
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:
|
More stable energy supplay.
Improved working conditions, increased motivation
Improved trade balance.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?
|
Yes.
|
|
Describe economic benefits in detail:
|
Decreased fuel costs
Through cooperation with swedish company the Kazlu Rudos Metalas has started boiler/prefurnace
production which stands for about 50% for their income.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?
|
Yes.
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real,
measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not
have occurred in the absence of such activities
1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:
The reference scenario represents at status quo situation. The decrease in energy consumption that followed
after 1990 is assumed to have reached full impact, meaning a stable heat consumption over the life-time of
the project. Loan from NUTEK is so far one of the very few sources to finance this type of investments for
municipalities in Lithuania. As this would imply that an alternative investment would not have taken place,
neither the consequence of another investment, nor the consequence of an alternative technical solutions
are considered.î
2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:
Cf. E.1. above.
Fill in the following tables as applicable:
Summary table: Projected emission reduction s:
|
GHG
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year 10
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
4400
|
4400
|
|
4400
|
|
CH4
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
0
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
CH4
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
- 4 400
|
- 4 400
|
|
- 4 400
|
|
CH4
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
- 4 400
|
- 8 800
|
|
- 44 000
|
|
CH4
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
0
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
Summary table: Actual emission reductions :
|
GHG
|
Year 1
= 1995
|
Year 2
=1996
|
...
|
Year X
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
1393
|
1877
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
other
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
other
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
-1393
|
-1877
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
-1393
|
-3270
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
F. Additionality to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the
framework of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows
Please indicate all sources of project funding.
|
Category of funding
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(US dollars)
|
|
Loan from NUTEK
|
335.000
|
|
Grant from NUTEK for technical assistance
|
65.000
|
1 USD = 7.50 SEK
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to
other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the
Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of
endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties
|
Transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how
|
Describe briefly
|
|
Schematically, the transfer of knowledge involves the following activities over time:
i) Technology transfer through NUTEKs technical specialist during the implementation of the
project.
ii) Technology transfer through cooperation between foreign supplier and local partner
iii) Conferences, seminars, documentation and training.
iv) Stimulate înet-workingî for the exchange or experience between plant owners with
similar problems, e g îbio-clubsî
|
technology transfer has taken place through
i) NUTEKs technical specialist support to the local project leader and municipality.
ii) Tecnology transfer through coopration between Swedish company HOTAB and kazlu Rudos Metalas
during NUTEK financed projects in Baltic countries and Russia, even locally financed projects in
Lithuania
iii) personal from boilerplant has been invited to different seminars and work-shops, documentation
for training has been handed ower
iv) boilerplant has been visited by specialist of other boilerplants, the staff has an exchange of
experience with other boilerplants and is active in îbio-clubî .
|
Endogenous capacity supported or enhanced:
|
Endogenous capacity
(Name of organization1)
|
Development (DEV) /
enhancement (ENH)
|
Describe briefly
|
|
Kazlu Rudos Metalas
|
(DEV)
|
New biofuel firing technology has been developped. Experience in installation and exploitation of
modern western technology.
|
1) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations listed is reported under section
A.2 above .
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties,
effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered
Fill in as appropriate:
1) Any practical experience gained: KRM have started a co-operation with the Swedish company Hotab,
working with boiler reconstruction.
KRM is working with information and development of new technique in the bio fuel area.
2) Technical difficulties:
3) Effects encountered:
4) Impacts encountered:
5) Other obstacles encountered: Some customers have disconnected from the district heating net.
Restrictions from the municipal council to deliver heat ( heat will not be delivered when medium temp is
over 10 C ).
6) Other: There is a possibility to increase the load for the boilerhouse in the future.
