Your location: Home

ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY (AIJ)
 
UNIFORM REPORTING FORMAT:
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY
UNDER THE PILOT PHASE

UNIFORM REPORTING FORMAT:

ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY UNDER THE PILOT PHASE

The uniform reporting format contained below is to be used in reporting on activities implemented jointly under the pilot phase. It is noted that the reporting should be consistent with decision 5/CP.1 and 8/CP.2 (reproduced in annexes I and II to this reporting format). The SBSTA notes that the uniform reporting format could possibly require revision in the light of experience gained and methodological work conducted under the pilot phase.

List of Projects

A. Description of project

A. 1) Title of project:

Energy efficiency improvement by Hungarian municipalities and utilities

A. 2) Participants/actors:

Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item AFunction within activity".

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organization(a):

Novem b.v.

Name of organization (English):

Novem b.v.

Department:

International Coordination

Acronym:

NOVEM/EC/COE

Acronym (English):

NOVEM/IC/CEE

Function within activity:

Project management/transfer of know-how

Street:

Catharijnesingel 59

PO Box 8242

Post code:

3503 RE

City:

Utrecht

Country:

The Netherlands

Telephone:

+ 31 30 239 3493

Fax:

+ 31 30 231 6491

E-mail:

WWW-URL:

//www.novem.nl

Contact person (for this activity):

------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Luken

First name, middle name:

Eppe

Job title:

Program manager Central & Eastern Europe

Direct tel:

+ 31 30 239 3427

Direct fax:

+ 31 30 231 6491

Direct E-mail:

NLNOVEM@IBMMAIL.COM

a) Organization includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organizations, etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency closely following the activity.

Item

Please fill in if applicable

Name of organization(a):

EGI/GEA Contracting/Engineering Company Ltd

Name of organization (English):

EGI/GEA Contracting/Engineering Company Ltd

Department:

EGI

Acronym:

EGI

Acronym (English):

EGI

Function within activity:

Consultant

Street:

BEM Rakpart 33-34

Post code:

H-1027

City:

Budapest

Country:

Hungary

Telephone:

+ 36 1 201 8652

Fax:

+ 36 1 201 9216

E-mail:

EEE@EGI.HU

WWW-URL:

Contact person (for this activity):

------------------------------------------------------------

Surname:

Kovacsics

First name, middle name:

Istv<>

Job title:

Senior consultant

Direct tel:

+ 36 1 201 8652

Direct fax:

+ 36 1 201 9216

Direct E-mail:

EEE@EGI.HU

A. 3) Activity:

Item

Please fill in if applicable

General description:

Energy efficiency improvement

Type of project:a)

Energy efficiency, fuel switch

Location (exact, e.g. city, region,

state):

Various Hungarian municipalities

(Emod, S< Budakal

Activity starting date:

1994

Expected activity ending date:

1997

Stage of activity:b)

in progress

Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)

20 years (average)

Technical data:d)

a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.

b) Circle the appropriate option.

c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.

d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data requirements are.

A. 4) Cost (to the extent possible):

Item

Year 1

Year 2

...

Year X

Cost of the project in US$:

4.08

AIJ component in US$:

0.15

US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:

17.1

Describe briefly how costs are determined:

Total project costs include an accumulation (over the project period) of audit costs, monitoring equipment costs, investments and annual monitoring costs

The AIJ component represents the contribution of the Netherlands to these total costs.

A. 5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:

Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involved):

Municipalties involved in the project collect performance data directly from proved metering and from monitoring equipment installed

a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations mentioned is reported under

section A.2 above.

B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement

Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance, approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be shown as follows:

(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached letters issued by the relevant national authorities;

(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been received from all participating Parties.

B. 1) For the activity:

* First report and joint reporting: please add copies of letters of endorsement by each designated national authority of Parties involved in the activity.

* Subsequent reports:

Activity was: _

_ suspended

_ terminated earlier

Describe:

B. 2) This report is a joint report:
X -Yes, forward copy of agreement/endorsement by the designated national authorities involved

_ -No

B. 3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:

C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies

Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies

The project contributes to and supports Hungarian energy and environmental policies

D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project

Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of quantative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)

Item

Please fill in

Describe environmental benefits in detail:

Enhancement of energy saving

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?

Yes

Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:

Safety and aesthetic effects

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?

No, data could be collected but are not available now

Describe economic benefits in detail:

Lower energy costs for municipalities

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?

Yes

E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real, measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not have occurred in the absence of such activities

E. 1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):

Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:

Situation before the project is implemented with the assumption that existing installations would not have been replaced during the technical lifetime of the new equipment

E. 2) Estimated emissions with the activity:

Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:

Energy savings are calculated using constant energy demand (for lightning and heating) data and energy efficiency data for new equipment. The conversion from electric energy use (in kWh) to CO2 emissions is carried out using standard IPCC methodology.

Fill in the following tables as applicable:

E.2.1) Summary table: Projected emission reduction s (in tons):

GHG

Year 1

Year 2

...

Year 20

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

30.800

30.800

...

30.800

CH4

N2O

other

B) Project activity scenarioa)

CO2

18.800

18.800

...

18.800

CH4

N2O

other

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

12.000

12.000

...

12.000

CH4

N2O

Other

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

12.000

24.000

...

240.000

CH4

N2O

Other

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

E.2.2) Summary table: Actual emission reductions (not yet known):

GHG

Year 1

Year 2

...

Year 20

A) Project baseline scenario

CO2

*

*

*

CH4

N2O

other

B) Project activity dataa)

CO2

*

*

*

CH4

N2O

other

C) Effect ( B-A )

CO2

*

*

*

CH4

N2O

Other

D) Cumulative effect

CO2

*

*

*

CH4

N2O

Other

a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.

*) Determination under processing

F. Bearing in mind that the financing of activities implemented jointly shall be additional to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows , please indicate

Source of project funding

including pre-feasibility phase

(For each source one line)

Amount

(US dollars)

Netherlands Government

0.17 million

Hungarian Municipalities

2.93 million

G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties

Describe briefly the transfer of environmenally sound technology and know-how including where appropriate the type of technology, terms, education, capactity building etc.

The technology transferred to municipalities is mainly made in Hungaria. An exception is the new heat recovery equipment installed, which is of Swedish origin. The project strengthens the in-country transfer of know-how.

Local energy officers of municipalities are trained by the Hungarian partner, EGI.

H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties, effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered

Fill in as appropriate:

H. 1) Any practical experience gained:

H. 2) Technical difficulties:

H. 3) negative impacts and/or effects encountered:

Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s). (If the amount of quantative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)

Item

Please fill in

Describe environmental negative impacts/effects in detail:

Not to be expected from this project

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental negative impacts/effects?

Not relevant

Describe social/cultural negative impacts/effects in detail:

Not to be expected from this project

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social negative impacts/effects?

Not relevant

Describe economic negative impacts/effects in detail:

Not to be expected from this project

Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic negative impacts/effects?

Yes

H. 4) Other obstacles encountered:

H. 5) Other:


Ready for some Climate Change News?

Visit the
NEWSROOM