UNIFORM REPORTING FORMAT:
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY
UNDER THE PILOT PHASE
UNIFORM REPORTING FORMAT:
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY UNDER THE PILOT PHASE
The uniform reporting format contained below is to be used in reporting on activities implemented jointly
under the pilot phase. It is noted that the reporting should be consistent with decision 5/CP.1 and 8/CP.2
(reproduced in annexes I and II to this reporting format). The SBSTA notes that the uniform reporting
format could possibly require revision in the light of experience gained and methodological work conducted
under the pilot phase.
List of
Projects
A. Description of project
A. 1) Title of project:
Energy efficiency improvement by Hungarian municipalities and utilities
A. 2) Participants/actors:
Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item
AFunction within activity".
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Novem b.v.
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Novem b.v.
|
|
Department:
|
International Coordination
|
|
Acronym:
|
NOVEM/EC/COE
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
NOVEM/IC/CEE
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Project management/transfer of know-how
|
|
Street:
|
Catharijnesingel 59
PO Box 8242
|
|
Post code:
|
3503 RE
|
|
City:
|
Utrecht
|
|
Country:
|
The Netherlands
|
|
Telephone:
|
+ 31 30 239 3493
|
|
Fax:
|
+ 31 30 231 6491
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
//www.novem.nl
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Luken
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Eppe
|
|
Job title:
|
Program manager Central & Eastern Europe
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+ 31 30 239 3427
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+ 31 30 231 6491
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
NLNOVEM@IBMMAIL.COM
|
a) Organization includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organizations,
etc. involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government
agency closely following the activity.
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
EGI/GEA Contracting/Engineering Company Ltd
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
EGI/GEA Contracting/Engineering Company Ltd
|
|
Department:
|
EGI
|
|
Acronym:
|
EGI
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
EGI
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Consultant
|
|
Street:
|
BEM Rakpart 33-34
|
|
Post code:
|
H-1027
|
|
City:
|
Budapest
|
|
Country:
|
Hungary
|
|
Telephone:
|
+ 36 1 201 8652
|
|
Fax:
|
+ 36 1 201 9216
|
|
E-mail:
|
EEE@EGI.HU
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Kovacsics
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Istv<>
|
|
Job title:
|
Senior consultant
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+ 36 1 201 8652
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+ 36 1 201 9216
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
EEE@EGI.HU
|
A. 3) Activity:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Energy efficiency improvement
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
Energy efficiency, fuel switch
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region,
state):
|
Various Hungarian municipalities
(Emod, S< Budakal
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
1994
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
1997
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
in progress
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
20 years (average)
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
|
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy
efficiency; renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation;
afforestation; fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker
fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum
data requirements are.
A. 4) Cost (to the extent possible):
|
Item
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year X
|
|
Cost of the project in US$:
|
|
|
|
4.08
|
|
AIJ component in US$:
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:
|
|
|
|
17.1
|
Describe briefly how costs are determined:
Total project costs include an accumulation (over the project period) of audit costs, monitoring equipment
costs, investments and annual monitoring costs
The AIJ component represents the contribution of the Netherlands to these total costs.
A. 5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involved):
|
|
Municipalties involved in the project collect performance data directly from proved metering and
from monitoring equipment installed
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations mentioned is reported
under
section A.2 above.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance,
approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be
shown as follows:
(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one
participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached
letters issued by the relevant national authorities;
(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national
authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been
received from all participating Parties.
B. 1) For the activity:
* First report and joint reporting: please add copies of letters of endorsement by each designated national
authority of Parties involved in the activity.
* Subsequent reports:
Activity was: _
_ suspended
_ terminated earlier
Describe:
B. 2) This report is a joint report:
X -Yes, forward copy of agreement/endorsement by the
designated national authorities involved
_ -No
B. 3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio-economic and
environment priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national
economic development and socio-economic and environment priorities and strategies
|
|
The project contributes to and supports Hungarian energy and environmental policies
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
Enhancement of energy saving
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
Yes
|
|
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:
|
Safety and aesthetic effects
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?
|
No, data could be collected but are not available now
|
|
Describe economic benefits in detail:
|
Lower energy costs for municipalities
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?
|
Yes
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real,
measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not
have occurred in the absence of such activities
E. 1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:
Situation before the project is implemented with the assumption that existing installations would not have
been replaced during the technical lifetime of the new equipment
E. 2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:
Energy savings are calculated using constant energy demand (for lightning and heating) data and energy
efficiency data for new equipment. The conversion from electric energy use (in kWh) to CO2
emissions is carried out using standard IPCC methodology.
Fill in the following tables as applicable:
E.2.1) Summary table: Projected emission reduction s (in tons):
|
GHG
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year 20
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
30.800
|
30.800
|
...
|
30.800
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
18.800
|
18.800
|
...
|
18.800
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
12.000
|
12.000
|
...
|
12.000
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
12.000
|
24.000
|
...
|
240.000
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
E.2.2) Summary table: Actual emission reductions (not yet known):
|
GHG
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year 20
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
*
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity dataa)
|
CO2
|
*
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
*
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
*
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
*) Determination under processing
F. Bearing in mind that the financing of activities implemented jointly shall be additional to financial
obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the framework of the financial
mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows , please indicate
|
Source of project funding
including pre-feasibility phase
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(US dollars)
|
|
Netherlands Government
|
0.17 million
|
|
Hungarian Municipalities
|
2.93 million
|
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to
other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the
Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of
endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties
Describe briefly the transfer of environmenally sound technology and know-how including where appropriate
the type of technology, terms, education, capactity building etc.
The technology transferred to municipalities is mainly made in Hungaria. An exception is the new heat
recovery equipment installed, which is of Swedish origin. The project strengthens the in-country transfer
of know-how.
Local energy officers of municipalities are trained by the Hungarian partner, EGI.
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties,
effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered
Fill in as appropriate:
H. 1) Any practical experience gained:
H. 2) Technical difficulties:
H. 3) negative impacts and/or effects encountered:
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
Not to be expected from this project
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental negative impacts/effects?
|
Not relevant
|
|
Describe social/cultural negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
Not to be expected from this project
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social negative impacts/effects?
|
Not relevant
|
|
Describe economic negative impacts/effects in detail:
|
Not to be expected from this project
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic negative impacts/effects?
|
Yes
|
H. 4) Other obstacles encountered:
H. 5) Other:
