Annex I
UNIFORM REPORTING FORMAT:
ACTIVITIES IMPLEMENTED JOINTLY UNDER THE PILOT PHASE
List of
Projects
A. Description of project
1) Title of project:
Haabneeme Boiler Conversion
2) Participants/actors:
Please fill in one table for each participant/actor. For individuals fill in as from item Function
within activity".
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Närings- och Teknikutvecklingsverket
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Swedish National Board for Industrial and Technical Development
|
|
Department:
|
Environmentally Adapted Energy System in the Baltic Region and Eastern Europe.
|
|
Acronym:
|
NUTEK
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
NUTEK
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Assigned by the Swedish Government for Implementation including financing arrangements.
|
|
Street:
|
Liljeholmsvägen 32
|
|
Post code:
|
S-117 86
|
|
City:
|
Stockholm
|
|
Country:
|
Sweden
|
|
Telephone:
|
+46-8-681 96 07
|
|
Fax:
|
+46-8-681 96 67
|
|
E-mail:
|
gudrun.knutsson@nutek.se
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
http://www.nutek.se
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Liib
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Aili
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+46-8-681 96 72
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+46-8-681 96 67
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
aili.liib@nutek.se
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Estonian co-reporter
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
(standard classifiers to be developed)
|
|
Street:
|
|
|
Post code:
|
|
|
City:
|
|
|
Country:
|
ESTONIA
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel:
|
|
|
Direct fax:
|
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
A/S Tamult Ltd
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Plant owner
|
|
Street:
|
Harjumaa
|
|
Post code:
|
EE 3006
|
|
City:
|
Haabneeme
|
|
Country:
|
ESTONIA
|
|
Telephone:
|
+372-2-79 07 18
|
|
Fax:
|
+372-2-79 00 21
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Taal
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Jüri
|
|
Job title:
|
Director
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+372-2-79 07 18
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+372-2-79 00 21
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
Institute of Energy Research
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Project evaluator
|
|
Street:
|
Paldiski road 1
|
|
Post code:
|
EE 0001
|
|
City:
|
Tallinn
|
|
Country:
|
ESTONIA
|
|
Telephone:
|
+372-2-45 03 03
|
|
Fax:
|
+372-2-45 24 35
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Vares
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Villu
|
|
Job title:
|
Professor
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+372-2-23 71 30 (home)
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+372-2-23 71 30 (home)
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
ÅF Energikonsult Syd AB
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
Technical Support
|
|
Street:
|
Stensjögatan 3
|
|
Post code:
|
S- 217 65
|
|
City:
|
MALMÖ
|
|
Country:
|
SWEDEN
|
|
Telephone:
|
+46-40-37 50 00
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
Mårtensson
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
Roland
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel:
|
+46-40-37 51 04
|
|
Direct fax:
|
+46-40-13 03 69
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
roland.martenssonens.af.se
|
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
Name of organization(a):
|
Estonian organisation for follow-up of climate effects.
|
|
Name of organization (English):
|
|
|
Department:
|
|
|
Acronym:
|
|
|
Acronym (English):
|
|
|
Function within activity:
|
(standard classifiers to be developed)
|
|
Street:
|
|
|
Post code:
|
|
|
City:
|
|
|
Country:
|
ESTONIA
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
|
Fax:
|
|
|
E-mail:
|
|
|
WWW-URL:
|
|
|
Contact person (for this activity):
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
Surname:
|
|
|
First name, middle name:
|
|
|
Job title:
|
|
|
Direct tel:
|
|
|
Direct fax:
|
|
|
Direct E-mail:
|
|
a) Organization includes: institutions, ministries, companies, non-governmental organizations, etc.
involved in the activity, i.e. research institutes associated with the project, auditors, government agency
closely following the activity.
3) Activity:
|
Item
|
Please fill in if applicable
|
|
General description:
|
Haabneeme, an area with private houses and fishing industry is about two km. outside of Tallinn.
The district gets heat from privately owned Haabneeme boiler plant. There are two oilfired DKVR
10/13 and two DE 25 -14 boilers in boilerhouse. One of the DKVR boilers has been converted to
firing biofuel.
|
|
Type of project:a)
|
conversion from fossile fuels to biofuels
|
|
Location (exact, e.g. city, region,
state):
|
Haabneeme
Harju County
Estonia
|
|
Activity starting date:
|
10. January 1994 (Letter of Intent)
|
|
Expected activity ending date:
|
30. September 20044
|
|
Stage of activity:b)
|
completed
|
|
Lifetime of activity if different from ending date:c)
|
|
|
Technical data:d)
|
An existing DKVR 10-13 boiler has been converted to biofuels firing through installation of a
movable inclined grate. Furthermore, automatic fuel storage, wood chipper and flue gas cleaning are
included in the project. The plant is dimensioned for 6 MW. The annual heat production in the
converted boiler is estimated at around 38 000 MWh.
|
a) For example, using Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) classification: energy efficiency;
renewable energy; fuel switching; forest preservation, restoration or reforestation; afforestation;
fugitive gas capture; industrial processes; solvents; agriculture; waste disposal or bunker fuels.
b) Circle the appropriate option.
c) Methodological work will be required to define lifetime of activities.
d) Methodological work will be required to determine for each type of activity what the minimum data
requirements are.
4) Cost (to the extent possible):
|
Item
|
Year 0
= 1994
|
Year 1
= 1995
|
Year 2
= 1996
|
Year
2 -9
|
Year 10
|
|
Cost of the project in US$:
|
704594
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIJ component in US$:
|
704594
|
6.700
|
6700
|
|
|
|
US$ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent:
|
5,68
|
9,08
|
9,08
|
|
|
Describe briefly how costs are determined:
The investment proper is calculated to be 623.987 USD and technical support 80.607 USD.
The lifetime or the project is foreseen to be minimum 10 years (corresponding to the maturity period of the
loan). The reference scenario is a status quo situation, assuming that no invest-ment would have been made
for the replaced technology. The following definitions are used:
Cost for the project in year 0:
Costs for investment (= loan from NUTEK) and technical assistance (= grant from NUTEK) are summarized over
the investment period (up to the time for commissioning) and stated for year 0, being the year of the date
for commissioning.
Cost for the project in consequtive years:
Costs (i e possible costs for investment and costs of AIJ component character) are shown per calender year.
Year 1 represents part of the calender year after the date of commissioning.
AIJ component in year 0:
The costs for technical assistance up to commissioning have a clear character of AIJ component. The costs
for the investment can also be maintained to have the an AIJ character, as the loan is a cost for the host
country, and as the loan represents a business risk for the financier, NUTEK.
AIJ component in consequtive years:
Encompasses in this report only one cost item - Costs for follow-up after the date of commissioning
(information exchange to secure a high utilisation of the investment + costs for measuring and reporting to
FCCC). The cost for follow-up for the years up to and including 1996 is calculated by dividing NUTEKs total
costs for follow-up by the total years of operation of all NUTEK-financed projects.
Other cost items, like difference between a market interest rate and the favourable interest rate (STIBOR)
which NUTEK applies and financial risk, may be considered at the next reporting occasion.
US $ per avoided ton of CO2 equivalent equals:
- at year 0 the cost of the project/AIJ component cost divided by the projected decrease in CO2
emission over the 10 year lifetime of the project
- for consequtive years the cost of the project/AIJ component divided by actual figure for decrease of
CO2 emission for each of the years 1 - 10.
5) Mutually agreed assessment procedures:
|
Describe the procedures, including name of organizations involveda):
|
|
It is intended that upon agreement with a central Estonian authority on reporting of JI-projects,
this authority will assign a local organisation, which will be involved in the evaluation of the
climate effects of this project. After an initial work in cooperation with NUTEKís assigned
consultant, this local organisation will take the main responsibility the continued measuring for
JI-reporting.
|
a) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations mentioned is reported under
section A.2 above.
B. Governmental acceptance, approval or endorsement
Bearing in mind that all activities implemented jointly under this pilot phase require prior acceptance,
approval or endorsement by the Governments of the Parties participating in these activities, which shall be
shown as follows:
(a) In the case of joint reporting, the report is submitted by the designated national authority of one
participating Party with the concurrence of all other participating Parties as evidenced by attached
letters issued by the relevant national authorities;
(b) In the case of separate reporting, the reports are submitted separately by the designated national
authority of each and every participating Party. Information will only be compiled once reports have been
received from all participating Parties.
1) For the activity:
* First report and joint reporting
2) This report is a joint report:
Yes,
3) General short comment by the government(s) if applicable:
Cf. Annex II, section B
C. Compatibility with and supportiveness of national economic development and socio economic and
environment priorities and strategies
|
Describe (to the extent possible) how the activity is compatible with and supportive of national
economic development and socio economic and environment priorities and strategies
|
|
The project meets the following objectives in the Estonian Energy Law:
- efficient use of energy resources;
- creation and usage of energy efficient technologies, fuel/energy consuming and diagnostic
equipment, construction and insulation materials; energy flow metering and control devices,
automated energy consumption control systems;
|
D. Benefits derived from the activities implemented jointly project
Whenever possible, quantitative information should be provided. Failing that, a qualitative description
should be given. If quantitative information becomes available, it could be submitted using the update(s).
(If the amount of quantative information is too large, the source could be indicated.)
|
Item
|
Please fill in
|
|
Describe environmental benefits in detail:
|
Annual emissions reduction
12400 ton CO2
189 ton SO2
1,1 ton NOx
Improved silviculture
Lower pollution in district
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of environmental benefits?
|
Yes. Some measurements have been has been carried out in 1994.
|
|
Describe social/cultural benefits in detail:
|
More stable energy supply
Improved working conditions, increased motivation
More employment (fuel companies)
Improved trade balance
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of social benefits?
|
Yes . Some reports have been produced
|
|
Describe economic benefits in detail:
|
Decreased fuel costs approx. 3 USD/MWh
The company Tamult has started to produce boiler equipment and install it for Estonian and Baltic
market together with swedish company Saxlund (Saxlund supplied equipment for Haabneeme project.)
30% from Tamult incomes comes from this activities.
|
|
Do quantitative data exist for evaluation of economic benefits?
|
Yes. Several reports have been produced.
|
E. Calculation of the contribution of activities implemented jointly projects that bring about real,
measurable and long-term environmental benefits related to the mitigation of climate change that would not
have occurred in the absence of such activities
1) Estimated emissions without the activity (project baseline):
Description of the baseline or reference scenario, including methodologies applied:
The reference scenario represents at status quo situation. The decrease in energy consumption that followed
after 1990 is assumed to have reached full impact, meaning a stable heat consumption over the life-time of
the project. Loan from NUTEK is so far the only source to finance this type of investments in Estonia. As
this would imply that an alternative investment would not have taken place, neither the consequence of
another investment, nor the consequence of an alternative technical solutions are considered.
2) Estimated emissions with the activity:
Description of the scenario, including methodologies applied:
Cf. E.1. above.
Fill in the following tables as applicable:
Summary table: Projected emission reduction s:
|
GHG
|
Year 1
|
Year 2
|
...
|
Year 10
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
12400
|
12400
|
|
12400
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
0
|
0
|
|
0
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
-12400
|
-12400
|
|
-12400
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
-12400
|
-24800
|
|
-124000
|
|
CH4
|
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
Summary table: Actual emission reductions :
|
GHG
|
Year 1
= 1995
|
Year 2
= 1996
|
...
|
Year X
|
|
A) Project baseline scenario
|
CO2
|
8500
|
8500
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
B) Project activity scenarioa)
|
CO2
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
C) Effect ( B-A )
|
CO2
|
-8500
|
-8500
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
D) Cumulative effect
|
CO2
|
-8500
|
-17000
|
|
|
|
CH4
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
N2O
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
-
|
|
|
|
a) Includes indirect GHG leakages.
F. Additionality to financial obligations of Parties included in Annex II to the Convention within the
framework of the financial mechanism as well as to current official development assistance flows
Please indicate all sources of project funding.
|
Category of funding
(For each source one line)
|
Amount
(US dollars)
|
|
Loan from NUTEK
|
623987 USD
|
|
Grant from NUTEK for technical assistans
|
80607 USD
|
1 USD = 7.50 SEK
G. Contribution to capacity building, transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how to
other Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to enable them to implement the provisions of the
Convention. In this process, the developed country Parties shall support the development and enhancement of
endogenous capacities and technologies of developing country Parties
|
Transfer of environmentally sound technologies and know-how
|
Describe briefly
|
|
Schematically, the transfer of knowledge involves the following activities over time:
i) Technology transfer through NUTEKs technical specialist during the implementation of the
project.
ii) Technology transfer through cooperation between foreign supplier and local partner
iii) Conferences, seminars, documentation and training.
iv) Stimulate înet-workingî for the exchange of experience between plant owners with
similar problems, e g îbio-clubsî
|
technology transfer has taken place through
i) NUTEKs technical specialist support to the local project leader and municipality.
ii) together with swedish supplier Tamult company has started up the production and installation of
biofuel firing equipment for Baltic and Russian market
iii) personal from boilerplant has been invited to different seminars and work-shops, documentation
for training has been handed ower
iv) boilerplant has been visited by specialist of other boilerplants, the staff has an exchange of
experience with other boilerplants and is active in îbio-clubî .
|
Endogenous capacity supported or enhanced:
|
Endogenous capacity
(Name of organization1)
|
Development (DEV) /
enhancement (ENH)
|
Describe briefly
|
|
Tamult
|
DEV
|
Boilerplant staff has developped the biofuel firing equipment for smaller boilers
|
1) Please ensure that detailed contact information for all organizations listed is reported under section
A.2 above .
H. Additional comments, if any, including any practical experience gained or technical difficulties,
effects, impacts or other obstacles encountered
Fill in as appropriate:
|
1) Any practical experience gained:
2) Technical difficulties:
3) Effects encountered:
4) Impacts encountered:
5) Other obstacles encountered:
6) Other:
|
Will be dealt with at next reporting occasion
|
