Distr.
GENERAL
FCCC/SBSTA/1996/16
14 November 1996
Original: ENGLISH
SUBSIDIARY BODY FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE
Fourth session
Geneva, 16-18 December 1996
Item 4 (a) of the provisional agenda
Paragraphs Page
I. INTRODUCTION 1 - 10 2
A. Mandate 1 - 4 2
B. Scope of the note 5 - 9 3
C. Possible actions by the Subsidiary Body for
Scientific and Technological Advice 10 4
II. BACKGROUND 11 - 13 4
III. METHODOLOGICAL WORK BY INTERNATIONAL
ORGANIZATIONS 14 - 19 6
IV. ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE SUBSIDIARY BODY
FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ADVICE 20 -28 8
Attendance 12
GE.96-
1. The Convention recognizes the importance of methodologies in several places, namely, in Articles 4.1(a), 4.1(f), 4.2(c), 7.2(d), 9.2(e) and 12.1(a). Moreover, the experience with preparing and reviewing national communications underlines the importance of adequate and comparable methodologies (FCCC/CP/1996/12 and Add.1 and 2).
2. At its first session, the Conference of the Parties (COP 1), by
its decision 4/CP.1, decided "that the Subsidiary Body for Scientific
and Technological Advice, drawing upon existing competent
international bodies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, ... should ... consider the methodological issues
arising from the review of national communications, including those
identified in the compilation and synthesis of national
communications and in available in-depth review reports, and make
recommendations thereon to the Conference of the Parties at its
second session" and "propose a work plan and timetable for
longer-term activities relating to methodological questions
(including inventory methodologies and methodologies for analysing
impacts and mitigation options) and the establishment of working
relationships with other bodies (in particular, the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change and its working groups and programmes)"
(FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1).
3. At its third session, the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (SBSTA) took note of a summary report by the secretariat of a meeting on methodologies
(as discussed below), held with relevant international
organizations. It requested the secretariat to prepare a report on
the matter for the fourth session (FCCC/SBSTA/1996/13).
4. Furthermore, in anticipation of the budget for the 1998-1999
biennium being debated by the Conference of the Parties at its third
session, the secretariat has to prepare a budget proposal in early
1997. In order to prepare this, the secretariat needs guidance on the
activities it should undertake to support the needs of the Convention
bodies for work on methodologies.
5. This note has been prepared in response to the above requests.
The purpose of the note is to provide the SBSTA with an overview of
current methodological programmes, to identify important gaps and to
define options for consideration that would ensure that methods are
available in the future.
6. The note is based on information provided by a number of United
Nations bodies and specialized agencies as well as other
intergovernmental organizations on current and future programmes to
develop and disseminate methodologies relevant to the Convention. It
is also based on the secretariat's experience in the review process
for national communications and the preparation of compilation and
synthesis reports on national communications (FCCC/CP/1996/12 and
Add.1 and 2) and in assisting other organizations to provide their
support for national studies. The activities of national governments
have not been specifically addressed in this document.
7. In order to prepare this note, the Executive Secretary convened
a meeting of representatives from competent international
organizations, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) (see attendance list in the annex below). The meeting
was held in Geneva from 4 to 5 July 1996. The representatives
provided the secretariat with information on their current and
planned activities as described in document FCCC/SBSTA/1996/16/Add.1.
A preliminary draft of the present note was subsequently circulated
to the representatives who attended the meeting to determine the
accuracy of the information reported therein. During this preliminary
review process, the IPCC secretariat provided a special note
indicating that it felt that it should not comment on section C of
the present document.
8. The secretariat has focused on practical tools and products,
including models, that can assist Parties in meeting their
commitments, such as preparing national communications, assessing
impacts, evaluating technologies and assessing policies and measures.
Activities that contribute to the general improvement and development
of methodologies, although not to specific products, are identified
in some cases, but given less emphasis. This document does not
address training activities. Yet, the secretariat is aware that these
activities could be looked upon as an inherent step in the process of
developing methods and can provide important information for the
process of revising methods. Training is a component of some
bilateral support programmes and multilateral enabling
activities.
9. Also at its third session, the SBSTA considered the issue of communications from Parties included in Annex I to the Convention, including methodological issues identified in documents FCCC/SBSTA/1996/9/Add.1 and 2. The issues referred to in these documents, namely, electricity trades, international emissions associated with bunker fuels, the use of global warming potentials, land-use change and forestry, and temperature adjustments, are primarily concerned with methods needed in the near term for calculating, allocating and reporting emission inventory information. The SBSTA invited Parties to submit comments on these issues for consideration at the fourth session of the SBSTA
(see FCCC/SBSTA/1996/MISC.5). They are not treated in this
document but will be considered separately under this agenda
item.
10. The SBSTA may wish to consider the issues in section IV below
and, on that basis:
(a) Give a preliminary indication of the areas of methodological
work that should be given the highest priority in the context of the
needs of the Convention, taking account of the suggestions in
paragraph 23 below;
(b) Invite the Joint Working Group of officers of the IPCC and the
Convention (JWG) to advise on an appropriate division of
methodological tasks between the IPCC and the Convention bodies,
particularly on methods for emission inventories, assessing impacts
of climate change and assessing mitigation and adaptation options,
taking account of the need for sustainable financing of these tasks
and of work under way by other international organizations (see
document FCCC/SBSTA/1996/16/Add.1);
(c) Review, at its fifth session, the advice of the JWG and on
that basis decide what should be done by the Convention bodies and,
as appropriate, express its views to the IPCC;
(d) Review, at its fifth session, the methodological component of
the secretariat's outline of the Convention budget for the biennium
1998-1999, in the light of, inter alia, the advice of the
JWG, and advise the SBI thereon;
(e) Invite the SBI to consider whether future policy guidance from the COP to the Global Environment Facility (GEF) could highlight the importance of securing adequate financial support from the GEF for the priority methodological work needed by the Convention, ensuring that such work corresponds to the programme priorities established by the COP and the resultant operational programmes of the GEF and that it is done in a
cost-effective and non-duplicative manner;
(f) Keep under review, at one session each year, the progress of work on methodological questions and its financing and, in support of this review, request its
Vice-Chairman to convene informal open-ended consultations on these questions, in conjunction with its sessions.
11. The secretariat has identified a preliminary list of
methodologies, with relevance to the Convention, as listed in
paragraph 13 below. For the purpose of this paper, a methodology is
defined as a method, procedure, model, or similar tool needed by the
Parties to support the implementation of their commitments under the
Convention. Methods needed for scientific purposes, such as for the
systematic observation of the atmosphere or the oceans, while clearly
relevant to the Convention, have not been
included.(1)
12. The activities undertaken by international organizations to
produce methods include:
Development of methodologies
Preparation of documentation
Testing at the national level
Revision
Peer review
Dissemination
Training (2)
13. The following is a list of areas relevant to implementation of
the Convention where methodologies need to be developed or revised
over time.
Examples of national/regional level
methodologies
Inventorying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions - methods to
estimate GHG emissions from sources or sequestration by
sinks
Projecting national GHG emissions - methods to estimate
future GHG emissions or removals by sinks, for example,
extrapolation, expert judgement, linear programmes and macroeconomic
models
Evaluating national technology needs and financial requirements - procedures for determining the types of technologies needed by a country to achieve its national climate change goals, including the related financial requirements, in the context of its economic and social objectives
Assessing technology transfer activities - procedures for identifying and evaluating the impacts and effectiveness of technologies that have been transferred from one Party to another
Assessing mitigation and adaptation technologies - methods for evaluating different technologies by determining, for example, performance, costs, and environmental impacts over time (3)
Assessing mitigation measures and policies - methods for
estimating the potential emission reductions, costs and other
operational requirements of a single measure or combination of
measures and policies over some period of time
Evaluating the effectiveness of policies and measures to limit
emissions or enhance removals of GHG or to adapt to climate
change - methods to determine whether or to what extent a
measure or policy achieved its intended objective
Evaluating activities implemented jointly and developing methodologies relevant for joint implementation - procedures for determining the effectiveness of AIJ programmes and projects identified by Parties and further development of the concept of joint implementation
Assessing the impacts of climate change - methods for
projecting the impacts of climate change on a geographical region,
economic sector, human health, food production, or ecological system
(4)
Evaluating adaptation options - methods for comparing
different technologies and practices to adapt to climate change by
determining, for example, costs and impacts over time
Examples of global level methodologies
Projecting global GHG emissions - methods to estimate
future global GHG emissions or removals by sinks
Assessing the aggregate effects of policies and measures
- methods for estimating combined effects of different measures
(economic instruments, voluntary agreements, and regulation)
initiated by all Parties on global emissions
Financial investment flows - procedures for estimating
current and future investment flows likely to affect GHG emissions
and removals by sinks
What is being done or planned by international
organizations
14. A review indicates that two topics have received or are
receiving particular attention by the IPCC, namely, methods to
inventory GHG emissions and methods to assess the impacts of climate
change. In addition, the IPCC has developed methods to assess
mitigation measures and policies (options).
15. The IPCC, with the cooperation of the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the International
Energy Agency (IEA), has led efforts to develop and improve national
GHG inventory methods. Recently, the IPCC at its twelfth plenary
session, held from 11 to 13 September 1996 in Mexico City, approved
Revised 1996 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas
Inventories (FCCC/SBSTA/1996/18/Add.1). Plans for additional
work on this topic are identified in the report of the twelfth
plenary of the IPCC and are summarized in FCCC/SBSTA/1996/18. The
IPCC's GHG inventory programme, which aims at publishing the
Revised 1996 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas
Inventories and assessing a number of special topics, will cost
approximately SwF1 million in 1997 and will be paid for from the IPCC
budget.
16. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), in
collaboration with the University of Amsterdam, is identifying
methods to assess impacts of climate change for the following
sectors: water resources, coastal zones, agriculture, human health,
energy and industry, human settlements, forests, wildlife and
biodiversity and fisheries. A draft handbook has been developed and
is undergoing testing in eight developing countries. The handbook
does not contain "software", but identifies where Parties may obtain
software for their use. After revisions, UNEP will submit an advanced
version of the handbook for peer review and approval by the IPCC in
late 1997. UNEP is also working on methodologies to assess mitigation
measures and policies in collaboration with the Centre on Energy and
the Environment (Riso). The objective is to develop a methodological
framework for climate change mitigation analysis. The completion date
for the project is April 1998. The above-mentioned projects are being
primarily funded by the GEF and national governments.
17. The United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)
is developing a methodology for assessing options in the industrial
sector. The development of the methodology will be completed in
December 1996 and field testing, dissemination and training will be
undertaken in 1997.
18. Other international organizations are developing methods and
data of a general nature that might have potential applicability in
the long term. In some cases, they support basic work to develop
databases that Parties might have access to. In other cases, they
conduct workshops to assess methodological issues. The relevance of
these activities and the applicability of the products that emerge
vary widely.
19. Financial support for the development, distribution and
training associated with methods is precarious at best. Most
organizations' resources for the development of methods to support
the Convention are declining. However, the current COP 1 guidance to
GEF and the GEF guidelines limit the prospects for resources to
support further work on methodologies. With regard to the GEF
mandate, it should be noted that the development of methodologies is
different from the conduct of research. Both of these topics are
under consideration by the STAP.
FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL
ADVICE
20. The SBSTA may wish to give consideration to the following
substantive, institutional and financial issues.
Topics to be given priority
21. The SBSTA will need to determine firstly which methods listed
in this paper warrant attention at the international level and
secondly which topics should be given priority. Bearing in mind the
limited financial and personnel resources available for additional
activities, the following criteria for determining priorities of
future work appear to be relevant (in random order):
Would the method contribute to understanding the magnitude of the
global problem?
Would the method enable Parties to understand the damages and
benefits of climate change?
Is the method necessary for the preparation of national
communications by Parties included in Annex I to the Convention
(Annex I Parties) and/or Parties not included in Annex I to the
Convention (non-Annex I Parties)?
Would the method support the review of communications, build
confidence among Parties and encourage transparency and consistency
in reporting?
Would the method improve decision making and lower programme
implementation costs?
Would the method enable Parties to attract investment capital for
technology to limit GHGs or adapt to climate change?
Is the method technically feasible? Could it be produced at a
reasonable cost and on time?
22. In addition, the following factors may need to be
weighed:
(a) Whether greater use could be made of methods developed for use at the national level. Often these could gain acceptance by the international community, if they are modified to account for varying circumstances, but such revisions require additional funding;
(b) Whether the Convention process needs to be involved in the development, dissemination and training of all methods. For example, there are currently several technical teams that are supported by national governments, developing methods to project global emissions. While the products of such activities need synthesis and peer review, it may not be necessary for a single "standard" method (5) to be agreed upon and distributed to all Parties;
(c) Whether the needs of Annex I and non-Annex I Parties for
methodologies are significantly different and, if so, how these needs
should be reflected in priorities that the Parties may wish to
consider.
Methodological topics that may warrant special
consideration
23. Recognizing the programme of work of the IPCC and other
organizations, particularly in the areas of inventories, impacts and
mitigation methods, and considering the experience from the review
process, the secretariat suggests that the following topics are among
those that warrant additional special considerations at the
international level:
Methods for assessing mitigation measures and policies
- Often Parties have not identified in their national
communications the projected effects of measures on national GHG
emissions. In other cases, the possible interactive effects of
measures are not clearly presented. Methods are needed in order to
determine whether policies will be cost-effective and to provide
information to other Parties in a transparent manner
Methods for projecting emissions - In many cases
Parties have not included projections of emissions for all important
sources of GHGs in their national communications; for example,
projections of emissions and removals of GHGs were often omitted for
the land-use change and forestry sector
Methods for evaluating and monitoring the effectiveness of
specific policies and measures to limit or enhance removals of
GHGs - While many measures are just in the process of being
implemented, it should be possible in the near future to evaluate how
effective certain measures have been in reducing emissions. In other
words, have they performed as anticipated? This would enable Parties
to track the performance of measures and to learn from the success or
failure of other Parties
Methods to assess mitigation technologies - The
secretariat has identified several types of software that might be
used by Parties, particularly developing country Parties, to evaluate
technologies (FCCC/SBSTA/1996/4/Add.2). The availability of such
software does not suggest that it can be readily used by analysts in
many developing countries. Further work may be required to test,
revise and/or train personnel in developing countries. Also note
project 16 in document FCCC/SBSTA/1996/16/Add.1
Methods to evaluate activities implemented jointly and to
develop the concept of joint implementation - The
secretariat has suggested a list of methodological issues that
require additional work, for example, methods to develop uniform
baselines and to calculate emission reductions (FCCC/CP/1996/14,
para. 27). It will conduct an experts meeting to identify a list of
methodological issues (FCCC/SBSTA/1996/19)
In addition, the secretariat suggests that there is a need to
analyse how methods have been applied by the Parties in national
communications. For example, there has been no assessment of how the
Parties have used the Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas
Inventories (1995) or optional methods. This type of analysis
would be useful prior to revising existing methods. It would help to
determine the comparability of national inventories.
Relationships between the Convention bodies and other international organizations,
for example, UNEP, WHO, UNIDO, and OECD?
24. Such working arrangements could take many forms. First, the
SBSTA may wish to determine whether it wants to simply monitor
activities, to promote their coordination, and/or, after
consultations, to assign 'lead' responsibilities for specific
activities to particular international organizations. With regard to
monitoring, the secretariat could be requested to track and assess
the work of other organizations and report to the SBSTA. If the SBSTA
wishes to promote greater coordination, mechanisms could be developed
individually or collectively with international organizations, along
the lines of the Joint Working Group with the IPCC. Should the SBSTA
prefer to request that a single international organization be
responsible for the development and coordination of a particular
method, specific arrangements may be needed.
25. In the near term, the SBSTA may wish to encourage UNEP to work
in cooperation with the IPCC to expeditiously test, revise and peer
review the handbook on methods to assess impacts of climate change
and the OECD and IEA to continue their support to the IPCC for
methods development activities. Also, given the relationship of these
activities to national communications, these activities could benefit
from the feedback which occurs during the review process. The
secretariat could be asked to strengthen coordination with these and
other international organizations so as to enhance the relevance of
their work to the Convention.
Role of the IPCC in support of the Convention
26. The IPCC, in collaboration with other international
organizations, has played a unique role in supporting the Convention,
particularly the development of guidelines on national GHG
inventories, impact assessments of climate change and methods to
assess mitigation options. It has published documents and
collaborated in training in some cases and has an expert and
governmental review process that helps to ensure suitability of
particular options.(6) On the other
hand, many methodological issues are closely tied to policy
considerations which need to be addressed directly by the Convention
bodies. In some cases the emphasis is now shifting from developing
methods to improving them based on the experience in applying them in
national communications. The SBSTA may wish to consider which methods
the IPCC should focus on and whether the IPCC should be encouraged to
play a more expansive role in the coordination and development of
methods.
Activities of the SBSTA
27. Heretofore, the SBSTA has not determined which methodologies
should be considered and what role it wishes to play. Given the
importance of methodologies to the work of the Convention, the need
to set priorities and the need to address complex institutional
issues, it may wish to define its role in this respect and consider
appropriate organizational arrangements.
Financing methodological activities
28. The development, testing and diffusion of methods will be likely to require additional financial support, although the needs will depend on the extensiveness of the effort. Several options may be considered, such as: (a) encouraging governments to provide greater support to national, regional and international institutions; (b) requesting the governing bodies of international organizations to give a high priority to work in support of the UNFCCC process; (c) revising the guidance to the GEF so as to encourage support for specific methodological issues; and (d) providing for additions to the secretariat budget and/or contributions to the supplementary fund for the period 1998-1999.
The meeting on methodologies hosted by the secretariat on 4 to 5
July 1996 (see paragraph 7 above) was attended by representatives of
the following organizations:
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (UNESCO/IOC)
World Health Organization (WHO)
World Meteorological Organization (WMO)
Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel (STAP) of the Global Environment Facility (GEF)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
International Energy Agency (IEA)
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD)
The following organizations were unable to attend the
meeting:
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
Economic Commission for Europe (ECE)
Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP)
World Bank
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU)
1. For example, the World Meteorological Organization Technical Commission for Climatology is examining data and methods to detect global climate change.
2. Identified for completeness, but not treated in this document.
3. Parties may wish to refer to document FCC/SBSTA/1996/4 for a definition of technology.
4. It should be noted that many methods to assess the impacts of climate change are the same as methods to assess the impacts of climate and its normal variability on natural ecosystems and socio-economic activities.
5. Each such method should be transparent enough to be understood by a third party.
6. Other international organizations also have at a minimum scientific review processes. Generally, these are focused on ensuring that the needs of the parent organization are met.