NEGOTIATIONS
PROCESS
KEY DOCUMENTS
|
|
Adaptation Fund: Chronology
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
24-27 March, Bonn, Germany
|
|
2008
|
15-17 December, Bonn, Germany
4th meeting of the
Adaptation Fund Board
1-12 December, Poznan, Poland
At CMP 4/ SBI 29, which was held in Poznań, Poland from
1-12 December 2008, Parties considered the report of the Adaptation Fund Board and adopted a
decision (
1/CMP.4) putting the necessary administrative and legal arrangements in place to
allow for the full operationalization of the Adaptation Fund. In particular,
Parties adopted:
Parties also considered how to ensure that developing countries can directly access
resources under the Adaptation Fund. To this effect, Tuvalu submitted a proposal to
convey legal personality and authority to sell CERs upon the Adaptation Fund Board.
After deliberations, Parties agreed that the AFB be conferred with such legal
capacity as necessary for the discharge of its functions with regard to direct
access. Following from that decision, such legal capacity would have to be
recognized in some domestic jurisdiction and a Party to the Kyoto Protocol would
need to take the necessary legal measures for that to occur.
15-18 September, Bonn, Germany
3rd meeting of the
Adaptation Fund Board
16-19 June, Bonn, Germany
2nd meeting of the Adaptation
Fund Board
7-18 May, Bonn, Germany
At SBI 28 under agenda item " Other
matters", the Group of 77 and China requested information on the status of the
operationalization of the Adaptation Fund. The SBI Chair invited Mr. Richard
Muyungi (Tanzania), Chair of the Adaptation Fund Board, to report on the work of the
board to implement decision 1/CMP.3. The SBI took note of, and expressed its
appreciation for, the oral report of the Chair of the Adaptation Fund Board. It
also confirmed its support to the board for its work.
26-28 March, Bonn, Germany
1st meeting of the Adaptation
Fund Board
|
|
2007
|
3-14 December, Bali, Indonesia
At CMP 3/ SBI 27, Parties in
decision 1/CMP.3 decided to establish the Adaptation
Fund Board (AFB) as the operating entity to supervise and manage the
Adaptation Fund, under the authority and guidance of the CMP. Parties invited
the Global Environment Facility (GEF) to provide secretariat services to the AFB and
the World Bank to serve as trustee of the Adaptation Fund on an interim
basis. These interim institutional arrangements will be reviewed in
2011.
The CMP further decided that eligible Parties shall be able to submit their project
proposals directly to the AFB and that implementing or executing entities chosen by
governments that are able to implement the projects funded under the Adaptation Fund may
also approach the AFB directly.
29-30 November, Bali, Indonesia
Prior to CMP 3, Parties, in accordance with decision 5/CMP.2, paragraph 7, met for
informal consultations to exchange views and proposals on, inter alia, institutional
arrangements for the Adaptation Fund.
7-18 May, Bonn, Germany
At SBI 26, Parties noted the submission of the
GEF on how it would operationalize decision 5/CMP.2. The SBI considered
views from Parties on eligibility criteria, priority areas and monetization of the share
of proceeds for the Adaptation Fund, and agreed on a negotiating text for
a draft decision to be completed with, inter alia, elements on institutional
arrangements. The SBI noted a paper prepared by the co-chairs of the contact group
convened on the Adaptation Fund containing some points for
discussion on institutional arrangements for further consideration by SBI 27.
|
|
2006
|
Nairobi, Kenya
At CMP 2/ SBI 25, Parties considered submissions from
relevant international institutions and adopted a decision (
5/CMP2), which lays out the guiding principles and modalities with which the
Adaptation Fund shall operate. The decision requested the SBI to develop
recommendations to CMP 3 with the aim of adopting a decision on the following
issues:
- Eligibility criteria
- Priority areas
- Monetizing the share of proceeds
- Institutional arrangements.
It further invited interested institutions to submit their views on how they would
operationalize this decision.
18-26 May, Bonn, Germany
At SBI 24, Parties considered the submissions from Parties and
intergovernmental organizations as well as the report of the workshop on the Adaptation
Fund. The SBI prepared a compilation
document containing possible elements for a draft decision on the Adaptation
Fund,without prejudice to further input by
Parties.
The SBI invited relevant international institutions, without prejudice to any
institution, to submit further proposals.
3-5 May, Edmonton, Canada
Responding to a request contained in decision 28/CMP.1, a workshop on the
Adaptation Fund was held to promote an exchange of views on further guidance
for the operation of the Adaptation Fund. Following discussions based on submissions from
Parties (
Addendum) and submissions from intergovernmental organizations, presentations and
background papers, participants discussed various options in detail in break-out groups
focusing on institutional arrangements for the management of the Adaptation Fund, share
of proceeds and other funding, eligibility and disbursement requirements, and priority
areas.
The
workshop report fed into deliberations of th SBI on further guidance for the
operation of the Adaptation Fund.
|
|
2005
|
28 November - 10 December, Montréal, Canada
At CMP 1/ SBI 23, Parties in
decision 28/CMP.1 provided initial guidance to an entity entrusted with the operation
of the financial mechanism of the Convention, for the operation of the Adaptation Fund.
The decision invited Parties to submit their views on specific policies, programme
priorities and eligibility criteria for consideration by SBI 24 and Parties and relevant
international organizations to submit their views on possible arrangements for the
management of the Adaptation Fund for consideration by SBI 24. It also requested the
secretariat to organize, before SBI 24, a workshop to promote an exchange of views on
further guidance for the operation of the Adaptation Fund.
|
|
2001
|
29 October - 9 November, Marrakech, Morocco
At COP 7/ SBI 15, Parties adopted the Marrakech Accords, which include
decision 5/CP.7 on enhancing the implementation of adaptation and
decision 10/CP.7 on funding under the Kyoto Protocol.
In decision 10/CP,7, the COP decided that
- An adaptation fund shall be established to finance concrete adaptation projects and
programmes in developing country Parties that are Parties to the Protocol, as well as
activities identified in paragraph 8 of decision 5/CP.7
- The adaptation fund shall be financed from the share of proceeds on the clean
development mechanism project activities and other sources of funding.
Paragraph 8 of decision 10/CP.7 spells out the activities to be
funded from the Adaptation Fund:
- Starting to implement adaptation activities promptly where sufficient information is
available to warrant such activities, inter alia, in the areas of water resources
management, land management, agriculture, health, infrastructure development, fragile
ecosystems, including mountainous ecosystems, and integrated coastal zone management
- Improving the monitoring of diseases and vectors affected by climate change, and
related forecasting and early-warning systems, and in this context improving disease
control and prevention
- Supporting capacity building, including institutional capacity, for preventive
measures, planning, preparedness and management of disasters relating to climate change,
including contingency planning, in particular, for droughts and floods in areas prone to
extreme weather events
- Strengthening existing and, where needed, establishing national and regional centres
and information networks for rapid response to extreme weather events, utilizing
information technology as much as possible.
|
|
|
|
Reports of the Adaptation Fund Board to the CMP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|